Part 1
Part 1
Wen Jiang
Lin Wang
Solved
Problems in
Nonlinear
Oscillations
A Sourcebook for Scientists and
Engineers
Solved Problems in Nonlinear Oscillations
Zeng He · Wen Jiang · Lin Wang
Solved Problems
in Nonlinear Oscillations
A Sourcebook for Scientists and Engineers
Zeng He Wen Jiang
Department of Mechanics Department of Mechanics
Huazhong University of Science Huazhong University of Science
and Technology and Technology
Wuhan, China Wuhan, China
Lin Wang
Department of Mechanics
Huazhong University of Science
and Technology
Wuhan, China
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (12325201, 12072119).
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2025. This book is an open access publication.
Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribu-
tion and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original
author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were
made.
The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons license,
unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative
Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted
use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication
does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant
protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book
are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or
the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any
errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional
claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
The registered company address is: 152 Beach Road, #21-01/04 Gateway East, Singapore 189721,
Singapore
This handbook contains about 200 fully solved problems in analytical and numerical
methods for nonlinear oscillations. These comprise all the end-of-chapter problems
in Prof. Nayfeh and Prof. Mook’s famous book (Ali H. Nayfeh and Dean T. Mook.
Nonlinear Oscillations, Wiley-Interscience, 1979). Mathematical software is adopted
to make those solutions more accessible from a graphical point of view. This book
can be adopted as a supplement to course work study for graduates or senior under-
graduates. Since many exercise problems are adapted from scientific research papers,
this book also has a good reference value for scientists and engineers who work in
the area of nonlinear vibration.
We wish to express our appreciation to Jiabiao Yi and Yefeng Pu for their great help
in documentation editing and drafting, and to Springer Nature for the opportunity to
make available this supplement to Nonlinear Oscillations.
v
Contents
1 Problem List . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Chapter 2 Conservative Single-Degree-Of-Freedom Systems . . . . 1
1.2 Chapter 3 Nonconservative Single-Degree-Of-Freedom
Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3 Chapter 4 Forced Oscillations of Systems Having a Single
Degree of Freedom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.4 Chapter 5 Parametrically Excited Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.5 Chapter 6 Systems Having Finite Degrees of Freedom . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.6 Chapter 7 Continuous Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.7 Chapter 8 Traveling Waves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.1 Exercise 2.1 (Determine Solution Trajectories from Potential
Energy Curves of Conservative 1D Systems) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.2 Exercise 2.2 (Solving Conservative Systems by the Method
of Multiple Scales or Straightforward Expansion Combined
with Reformulation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.3 Exercise 2.3 (Show the System Transformation
and the Method of Multiple Scales) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.4 Exercise 2.4 (Show the Method of Averaging) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
2.5 Exercise 2.5 (Show the Effect of a Change in the Equilibrium
Point of a Nonlinear Spring on the Frequency-Amplitude
Relationship) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
2.6 Exercise 2.6 (Rods Sliding on the Smooth Walls) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
2.7 Exercise 2.7 (Period of the Osscillation Motion of a Single
Pendulum-Type System Along Separatrices) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
2.8 Exercise 2.8 (Particle on a Rotating Parabola) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
2.9 Exercise 2.9 (A Single Pendulum Rotating Uniformly
Around a Plumb Axis) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
2.10 Exercise 2.10 (A Single Pendulum Rotating Freely Around
a Plumb Axis) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
vii
viii Contents
To make it easier for the reader to access exercise problems, we have listed all
problems in this chapter and added a short description for each problem. In addition, in
the following chapters, “the Book” refers to “Nonlinear Oscillations. Ali H. Nayfeh &
Dean T. Mook, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1995, ISBN 0–471-12,142–8”). The
solutions are arranged according to the chapter names question-numbering in the
Book, and our handbook should be viewed as a supplement to the Book.
• Exercise 3.6 (Plotting phase trajectories and limit cycle(s) for a given equation)
• Exercise 3.7 (Plotting singularity and phase trajectories for a given planar system)
• Exercise 3.8 (Plot the trajectory of a singularity for a given planar system and
determine the stability of the singularity)
• Exercise 3.9 (The method of multiple scales for solving a single pendulum with
a Coulomb friction torque)
• Exercise 3.10 (Singularities and their stability of a linearly damped pendulum
under a constant torque)
• Exercise 3.11 (Singularities and their stability for a single pendulum with a
quadratic damping)
• Exercise 3.12 (Analysis of Rayleigh equation singularities, method of averaging
of solution)
• Exercise 3.13 (Singularity analysis of the restricted three-body exercise)
• Exercise 3.14 (Singularity analysis of amplitude and phase equations limiting the
resonance response of the three-body problem)
• Exercise 3.15 (Modeling of a single pendulum with a damper attached, solving
by the method of multiple scales)
• Exercise 3.16 (The method of multiple scales for solving van der Pol oscillators
with delay amplitude limiting)
• Exercise 3.17 (Averaging to solve for an oscillator with both Coulomb and viscous
damping)
• Exercise 3.18 (Averaging to solve for oscillators with both Coulomb and square
damping)
• Exercise 3.19 (Averaging to solve for oscillators with both viscous and square
damping)
• Exercise 3.20 (Averaging to solve for an oscillator with both viscous and negative
Coulomb damping)
• Exercise 3.21 (Averaging to solve for an oscillator with both squared damping
and negative Coulomb damping)
• Exercise 3.22 (Oscillators with simultaneous negative viscous damping, square
damping, and cubic nonlinearity)
• Exercise 3.23 (Method of averaging for solving oscillators with simultaneous
viscous, quadratic and cubic damping nonlinearities)
• Exercise 3.24 (Averaging to solve and analyze nonlinear vibrations of a pendulum)
• Exercise 3.25 (Viscous damping, negative stiffness, and cubic nonlinear systems)
• Exercise 3.26 (Transformations of variables and three-level number expansion
methods for solving a cubic nonlinear system)
• Exercise 3.27 (Application of elliptic functions to represent Solutions of a single
pendulum system with a general weak damping function)
• Exercise 3.28 (Masses bounded in definite orbits, analyzing singularities and their
bifurcations)
• Exercise 3.29 (Non-autonomous systems with slowly varying functions)
4 1 Problem List
• Exercise 4.1 (The method of multiple scales for analyzing primary resonances of
Coulomb-damped systems with cubic nonlinearities)
• Exercise 4.2 (The method of multiple scales for analyzing primary resonances of
cubic nonlinear, quadratic-damped systems)
• Exercise 4.3 (The method of multiple scales for analyzing primary resonances of
linear spring and hysteresis damped systems)
• Exercise 4.4 (The method of multiple scales for analyzing primary resonances of
linear spring, hysteresis and Coulomb damped systems)
• Exercise 4.5 (The method of multiple scales for analyzing primary resonances of
linear springs, hysteresis and linearly damped systems)
• Exercise 4.6 (The method of multiple scales for analyzing primary resonances of
linear spring, hysteresis and quadratic damped systems)
• Exercise 4.7 (The method of multiple scales for analyzing primary resonances of
quadraticd spring force and quadraticd damped systems)
• Exercise 4.8 (Primary, superharmonic, and subharmonic resonances of cubic
nonlinear and cubic damped systems)
• Exercise 4.9 (Method of averaging for analyzing primary resonances of alternating
damped systems)
• Exercise 4.10 (Primary, superharmonic, and subharmonic resonances of quadratic
and cubic nonlinear systems)
• Exercise 4.11 (Primary and secondary resonances of five nonlinear, linearly
damped systems)
• Exercise 4.12 (An iterative method for general undamped nonlinear systems)
• Exercise 4.13 (The method of harmonic balance to analyze viscous damping and
primary resonances of cubic nonlinear systems)
• Exercise 4.14 (The method of harmonic balance to analyze the primary resonance
of an undamped nonlinear system)
• Exercise 4.15 (Combination resonance for cubic nonlinear systems)
• Exercise 4.16 (The response of cubic nonlinear systems with primary resonance
and non-resonance excitation)
• Exercise 4.17 (Primary and combined resonance for cubic nonlinear systems I)
• Exercise 4.18 (Combined primary, subharmonic, and superharmonic resonances
of a cubic nonlinear system)
• Exercise 4.19 (Primary and combined resonance for cubic nonlinear systems II)
• Exercise 4.20 (Primary and combined resonance of a cubic nonlinear system)
• Exercise 4.21 (Primary resonance of the system with Coulomb friction and
quadratic nonlinearity)
• Exercise 4.22 (Primary resonance problem for the system with quadratic damp
and quadratic nonlinear terms)
• Exercise 4.23 (Combined resonance problem for quadratic nonlinear systems)
1.4 Chapter 5 Parametrically Excited Systems 5
• Exercise 5.1 (The method of strained parameters to determine the transition curves
for a Hill equation)
• Exercise 5.2 (The method of strained parameters to determine the transition curves
of the Hill’s equation for LRC circuits with sinusoidally varying resistance)
• Exercise 5.3 (Stability analysis of a supported movable pendulum)
• Exercise 5.4 (Analyze the linear and nonlinear stability of a rotating pendulum
using the method of strained parameters and the method of multiple scales)
• Exercise 5.5 (Parametric excitation of a particle-string system subjected to axial
forces at both ends)
• Exercise 5.6 (Linear and nonlinear stability analysis of a pendulum with varying
length)
6 1 Problem List
• Exercise 8.17 (Exact solution of the one-dimensional wave equation for an inviscid
isentropic gas)
• Exercise 8.18 (Approximate solutions of the one-dimensional wave equation for
a viscous isentropic gas and its Fourier expansion)
• Exercise 8.19 (Derivation of the Eulerian form of the one-dimensional wave
equation for an inviscid isentropic gas)
• Exercise 8.20 (Derivation of linear inviscid acoustic waves in a hardwalled duct)
• Exercise 8.21 (Analysis on the linear waves propagating on the surface of an
inviscid liquid of finite depth)
• Exercise 8.22 (The method of multiple scales for wave group propagation
governed by Klein–Gordon equation)
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing,
adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate
credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and
indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative
Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not
included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by
statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from
the copyright holder.
Chapter 2
Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom
Systems
Solution: (a) Let v = u̇, , then the differential equation for the solution trajectory of
(a) is given by
dv u
=− (2.1.1)
du v
The general solution of (2.1.1) is
v2 + u2 = 2E (2.1.2)
where E is the constant of integration, which is the total mechanical energy of the
mechanical system. Therefore, the phase trajectories of (a) are a set of concentric
circles centered at the origin (Fig. 2.1a).
(b) Let v = u̇, then the differential equation for the solution trajectory of (b) is
dv −u + u3
= (2.1.3)
du v
1
After integration, v2 + u2 − u4 = 2E (2.1.4)
2
The equation of the solution trajectory of (b) can be obtained from (2.1.4)
1
v = ± 2E − u2 + u4 (2.1.5)
2
The phase trajectories can be sketched directly or from the potential energy, V, of
the system:
u
1 2 1 4
f (u) = u − u , V (u) =
3
f (u)du = u − u (2.1.6)
2 4
0
One can obtain the singular points of the system s1 : (0,0), s2 : (1,0), s3 :
(−1,0) from Eq. (2.1.3), which, together with Eq. (2.1.5), can be adopted to sketch
the potential energy curve and phase trajectories of the system (Fig. 2.1b).
dv u − u3
(c) = (2.1.7)
du v
(a)
(b) (c)
Fig. 2.1 Potential energy curves and solution trajectories for Exercise 2.1 a–g
2.1 Exercise 2.1 (Determine Solution Trajectories from Potential Energy … 13
(d) (e)
(f) (g)
1
v2 − u2 + u4 = 2E (2.1.8)
2
1
v = ± 2E + u2 − u4 (2.1.9)
2
u
1 1
f (u) = −u + u , V (u) =
3
f (u)du = − u2 + u4 (2.1.10)
2 4
0
The potential energy curve and phase trajectories of the system are shown in
Fig. 2.1c.
dv −u − u3
(d) = (2.1.11)
du v
1
v2 + u2 + u4 = 2E (2.1.12)
2
1
v = ± 2E − u2 − u4 (2.1.13)
2
u
1 2 1 4
f (u) = u + u3 , V (u) = f (u)du = u + u (2.1.14)
2 4
0
s : (0,0)
The potential energy curve and phase trajectories of the system are shown in
Fig. 2.1d.
dv u + u3
(e) = (2.1.15)
du v
1
v2 − u2 − u4 = 2E (2.1.16)
2
1
v = ± 2E + u2 + u4 (2.1.17)
2
u
1 1
f (u) = −u − u , V (u) =
3
f (u)du = − u2 − u4 (2.1.18)
2 4
0
s : (0,0)
The potential energy curve and phase trajectories of the system are shown in
Fig. 2.1e.
2.1 Exercise 2.1 (Determine Solution Trajectories from Potential Energy … 15
dv −u3
(f) = (2.1.19)
du v
1
v2 + u4 = 2E (2.1.20)
2
1
v = ± 2E − u4 (2.1.21)
2
u
1 4
f (u) = −u + u , V (u) =
3
f (u)du = u (2.1.22)
4
0
s : (0,0)
The potential energy curve and phase trajectories of the system are shown in
Fig. 2.1f.
λ
dv −u − u−a
(g) = (2.1.23)
du v
This yields that the singular points of the system are
√ √
a+ a2 − 4λ a − a2 − 4λ
s1 : , 0 , s2 : ,0 (2.1.24)
2 2
u
λ
f (u) = u + , V (u) = f (u)du
u−a
0
1 2
u + λln(u − a), u−a >0
= 21 2 (2.1.28)
2
u − λln(a − u), u − a < 0
16 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
√
Let a = 8, λ = 1, then
√ √
s1 : ( 2 + 1, 0), s2 : ( 2 − 1, 0) (2.1.29)
√ √
v = ± 2E − u2 − 2ln(u − 8), u − 8 > 0
√ √
v = ± 2E − u2 + 2ln( 8 − u), u − 8 < 0 (2.1.30)
1 √ √
u2 + ln(u
√− 8), u − √8 > 0
V (u) = 2 (2.1.31)
1 2
2
u − ln( 8 − u), u − 8 < 0
The potential energy curve and phase trajectories of the system are shown in
Fig. 2.1g.
u + u3 − u3 u5
ü + ω02 = ü + ω 2
(u − u 3
+ ) ≈ ü + ω02 u − ω02 u3 = 0
1 + u2 0
1 + u2
u = εv
The method of multiple scales. We first solve the Eq. (2.2.2) using the the method
of multiple scales. Let the expansion of the solution be
where Tn = εn t. Consider
d
dt2
= D0 + εD1 + ε2 D2 + · · ·
d
dt 2
= (D0 + εD1 + ε2 D2 + · · · )2 = D02 + 2εD0 D1 + ε2 (D12 + 2D0 D2 ) + · · ·
(2.2.4)
0 = v̈ + ω02 v − εω02 v3
= [D02 + 2εD0 D1 + ε2 (D12 + 2D0 D2 )](v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 )
+ ω02 (v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 ) − ε2 ω02 (v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 )3 + · · ·
= D02 v0 + ω02 v0 + ε(D02 v1 + ω02 v1 + 2D0 D1 v0 )
+ ε2 [D02 v2 + ω02 v2 + 2D0 D1 v1 + (D12 + 2D0 D2 )v0 − ω02 v03 ] + · · · (2.2.5)
where cc denotes the complex conjugate of the preceding terms. In order to eliminate
the secular terms from the above equation, there must be
D1 A = 0 ⇒ A = A(T2 ) (2.2.11)
v1 = 0 (2.2.12)
where NST denotes terms which do not generate secular terms. In order to eliminate
the secular term from the above equation, there must be
1 iβ
Let A= ae (2.2.15)
2
and put (2.2.15) into (2.2.14), we obtain
3
i − a + aβ + ω0 a3 = 0 (2.2.16)
8
Separating the result into real and imaginary parts, we obtain
3
a = 0, aβ + ω0 a3 = 0 (2.2.17)
8
Therefore,
3
a = constant, β = − ω0 a2 t + β0 (2.2.18)
8
From the above results, the two-term approximation of the solution can be obtained
as
3
v = acos[(1 − a2 )ω0 t + β0 ] + · · · (2.2.19)
8
Therefore, the frequency-amplitude relationship of the oscillation is
3
ω = (1 − a2 )ω0 (2.2.20)
8
where ε = ε2 . Substitute (2.2.21) into the Eq. (2.2.2) and equate the coefficients of
the same power of ε in the result, giving
v0 = acos(ω0 t + β) (2.2.24)
3 1
v1 = ω0 a3 tsin(ω0 t + β) − a3 cos(3ω0 t + 3β) (2.2.26)
8 32
Therefore, the solution of Eq. (2.2.2) is
3 1
v = acos(ω0 t + β) + ε [ ω0 a3 tsin(ω0 t + β) − a3 cos(3ω0 t + 3β)] + · · ·
8 32
(2.2.27)
ε1
τ = t = (ω0 + ε1 + · · · )t ⇒ ω0 t = (1 − + · · · )τ (2.2.28)
ω0
put (2.2.28) into (2.2.27), and collect the result according to the power of ε:
lv = acos(τ + β)
1 a 3 1
+ ε̂[ τ sin(τ + β) + a3 τ sin(τ + β) − a3 cos(3τ + 3β)] + · · ·
ω0 8 32
(2.2.29)
We select 1 to eliminate secular terms of the Eq. (2.2.29) and this gives us
3
1 = − a2 ω0 (2.2.30)
8
Therefore, the two-term approximation of the solution of Eq. (2.2.1) is
20 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
3
u = εacos(τ + β) + · · · = εacos[(1 − ε2 a2 )ω0 t + β] + · · · (2.2.31)
8
3
ω = (1 − a2 )ω0 (2.2.33)
8
This result is the same as that of the multiscale method.
(b) Straightforward expansion combined with reformulation. Let
u = ελ v
If we take λ = 41 , then the coefficients of the nonlinear term are of order ε and
the Eq. (2.2.34) becomes
Then we substitute (2.2.36) into the Eq. (2.2.35) and set the coefficient of each
power of ε equal to zero. This leads to the following set of equations
v0 = acos(ω0 t + β) (2.2.39)
5 5
= − αa5 cos(ω0 t + β) − αa5 cos(3ω0 t + 3β)
8 16
1
− αa cos(5ω0 t + 5β)
5
(2.2.40)
16
The particular solution of the above equation is
5
u = ε1/4 acos(ω0 t + β) + ε5/4 [− αa5 tsin(ω0 t + β)
16ω0
5 1
+ αa5 cos(3ω0 t + 3β) + αa5 cos(5ω0 t + 5β)] (2.2.41)
128 384
Therefore, the solution of the original equation is
5
u = ε1/4 acos(ω0 t + β) + ε5/4 [− αa5 tsin(ω0 t + β)
16ω0
5 1
+ αa5 cos(3ω0 t + 3β) + αa5 cos(5ω0 t + 5β)] (2.2.42)
128 384
5 αa 5 1 a
u = ε1/4 acos(τ + β) + ε5/4 [− 16 ω2
τ sin(τ + β) + ω0
τ sin(τ + β)
0 (2.2.44)
+ 128
5
αa5 cos(3τ + 3β) + 1
384
αa5 cos(5τ + 5β) + · · · ]
5
1 = αa4 (2.2.45)
16ω0
5
u = u = ε1/4 acos(τ + β) + · · · = ε1/4 acos[(ω0 + αεa4 )t + β] + · · ·
16ω0
(2.2.46)
u = acos(ωt + β) (2.2.47)
22 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
5
ω = (ω0 + αa4 ) (2.2.48)
16ω0
(c) The method of multiple scales. The system described by Exercise 2.1(c) has three
singularities (0,0), (−1,0), (1,0), of which (0,0) is the saddle point and the remaining
two are the centers. The motion is oscillatory in the neighborhood of a center. Here
we discuss the oscillatory motion near the singularity (1,0). It is convenient to shift
the origin to the location of the center, u = 1. Thus, we let x = u − 1, then the
equation in Exercise 2.1(c) can be written as
ẍ + 2x + 3x2 + x3 = 0 (2.2.49)
Let
u = ελ v
where cc denotes the complex conjugate of the preceding terms. To eliminate the
secular terms in the above equation, we need D1 A = 0, so A = A(T2 ). The particular
solution of Eq. (2.2.59) is
Substituting (2.2.58) and (2.2.60) into (2.2.57), and taking A = A(T2 ) into
account, we obtain
where cc denotes the complex conjugate of the preceding terms and NST denotes
terms which do notgenerate secular terms. In order to eliminate the secular terms in
the above equation, we need
10δ 2
2iω0 D2 A − ( − 3α)A2 A = 0 (2.2.62)
3ω02
1 iβ
Let A = ae (2.2.63)
2
Substituting (2.2.63) into (2.2.62) leads to
1 10δ 2
iω0 D2 a − ω0 aD2 β − ( 2 − 3α)a3 = 0 (2.2.64)
8 3ω0
24 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
Separate the above equation into real and imaginary parts and yield
D2 a = 0 (2.2.65)
1 10δ 2
D2 β + ( − 3α)a2 = 0 (2.2.66)
8ω0 3ω02
1 10δ 2
β=− ( − 3α)a2 T2 + β0 (2.2.67)
8ω0 3ω02
1 10δ 2
u = εacos[ω0 t − ( − 3α)a2 ε2 t + β0 ] + · · · (2.2.68)
8ω0 3ω02
Let ε = 1 yield
1 10δ 2
u = acos[ω0 t − ( − 3α)a2 t + β0 ] + · · · (2.2.69)
8ω0 3ω02
Therefore, the relation between the oscillation frequency ω and the amplitude a
is
1 10δ 2
ω = ω0 − ( − 3α)a2 (2.2.70)
8ω0 3ω02
3 5 2 2
or ω2 = ω02 + αa2 − δ a (2.2.71)
4 6ω02
ω2 = 2 − 3a2 (2.2.72)
(d) Let
v
u= √ (2.2.73)
α
3
v = acos[(1 − a2 )ω0 t + β] (2.2.75)
8
where
3
ω = (1 − a2 )ω0 (2.2.76)
8
Solution: Since
(1 − u̇/c2 )3/2
ü + ω02 u =0 (2.3.2)
1 − 21 u̇/c2
√
where ω02 = k/m0 . We make a Taylor expansion of (1 − u̇/c2 )3/2 /(1 − 21 u̇/c2 ) and
yield
(1 − u̇/c2 )3/2 u̇ 1 u̇
= 1 − 2 − ( 2 )2 + · · · (2.3.3)
1 − 2 u̇/c
1 2 c 8 c
ω02 ω2
ü + ω02 u − 2
uu̇ − 04 uu̇2 = 0 (2.3.4)
c 8c
Let
u = ελ v
26 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
ω02 λ ω02 2λ 2
v̈ + ω02 v − ε vv̇ − ε vv̇ = 0 (2.3.5)
c2 8c4
Let λ = 1, then the Eq. (2.3.5) becomes
iα1 A2 2iω0 T0
v1 = − e + cc (2.3.14)
3ω0
Substituting (2.3.12) and (2.3.14) into (2.3.11), and taking A = A(T2 ) into
account, we obtain
α12
D02 v2 + ω02 v2 = [−2iω0 D2 A + ( + α2 ω02 )A2 A]eiω0 T0 + cc + NST (2.3.15)
3
where cc denotes the complex conjugate of its preceding terms and NST denotes
terms which do not generate secular terms. In order to eliminate secular terms, we
need
α12
2iω0 D2 A − ( + α2 ω02 )A2 A = 0 (2.3.16)
3
1 iβ
Let A= ae (2.3.17)
2
Substituting (2.3.17) into (2.3.16) leads to
α12
8iω0 D2 a − 8ω0 σ D2 β − ( + α2 ω02 )σ 3 = 0 (2.3.18)
3
Separate the above equation into real and imaginary parts and yield
D2 a = 0 (2.3.19)
α12
−8ω0 aD2 β − ( + α2 ω02 )a3 = 0 (2.3.20)
3
So a is a constant and
1 α12
β=− ( + α2 ω02 )a2 T2 + β0 (2.3.21)
8ω0 3
1 α12
u = εacos{[ω0 − ( + α2 ω02 )ε2 a2 ]t + β0 } + · · · (2.3.22)
8ω0 3
28 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
u = acos(ωt + β0 ) + · · · (2.3.23)
where
1 α12
ω = ω0 − ( + α2 ω02 )a2 (2.3.24)
8ω0 3
Substituting α1 = ω02 /c2 , α2 = ω02 /8c4 into the above equation, we obtain
11 ω03 2
ω = ω0 − a (2.3.25)
192 c4
√
where ω0 = k/m0 .
Solution: We use the pending power ελ , λ > 0 of the small parameter ε to measure
the magnitude of u, i.e.,
u = ελ v (2.4.2)
Here we use the method of averaging to solve the Eq. (2.4.4). When ε = 0,
v = acos(ω0 t + β) (2.4.5)
here a, β is a constant.
2.4 Exercise 2.4 (Show the Method of Averaging) 29
The principle of the method of averaging: when ε = 0, the solution of (2.4.4) can
still be expressed in the form (2.4.5) and (2.4.6) provided that aandβ are considered
to be functions of time t rather than constants. Thus, the Eqs. (2.4.5) and (2.4.6) can
be viewed as a transformation of v(t) and v̇(t) into the dependent variables a(t) and
β(t). Differentiating the Eq. (2.4.5) with respect to t gives
εa2
ȧ = sinϕcosϕ|cosϕ| (2.4.11)
ω0
εa
β̇ = cos2 ϕ|cosϕ| (2.4.12)
ω0
Averaging (2.4.11) and (2.4.12) over the period 2π/ω0 and considering a, β, ȧ and
β̇ to be constants while performing the averaging, we obtain the following equations
describing the slow variations of a and β:
2π
1 εa2
ȧ = sinφcosφ|cosφ|d φ
2π ω0
0
π/2 π
εa2
= [ sinφcos φd φ −
2
sinφcos2 φd φ]
π ω0
0 π/2
0 −1
εa2
=− [ x2 dx − x2 dx] = 0 (2.4.13)
π ω0
1 0
30 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
2π
1 εa
β̇ = cos2 φ|cosφ|d φ
2π ω0
0
π/2 π
εa
= [ cos φd φ −
3
cos3 φd φ]
π ω0
0 π/2
1 0
εa
= [ (1 − x2 )dx − (1 − x2 )dx]
π ω0
0 1
1
2εa 4εa
= (1 − x2 )dx = (2.4.14)
π ω0 3π ω0
0
4εa
β= t + β0 (2.4.15)
3π ω0
4εa
u = εacos[(ω0 + )t + β0 ] (2.4.16)
3π ω0
4a
u = acos[(ω0 + )t + β0 ] (2.4.17)
3π ω0
4a
ω = ω0 + (2.4.18)
3π ω0
Solution: (a) Select the position of the mass m when the spring is at rest as the origin
of the coordinate, we can obtain the governing equation of the system
2.5 Exercise 2.5 (Show the Effect of a Change in the Equilibrium Point … 31
Let
x = ελ v (2.5.3)
(2.5.1) changes to
We use the the method of multiple scales to solve the Eq. (2.5.5). Assume the
solution of the above equation can be represented by an expansion having the form
0 = v̈ + ω02 v + αε2 v3
= [D02 + 2εD0 D1 + ε2 (D12 + 2D0 D2 ) + · · · ](v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 + · · · )
+ ω02 (v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 + · · · ) + αε2 (v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 + · · · )3
= D02 v0 + ω02 v0 + ε(D02 v1 + 2D0 D1 v0 + ω02 v1 )
+ ε2 [D02 v2 + (D12 + 2D0 D2 )v0 + 2D0 D1 v1 + ω02 v2 + αv03 ] + · · · (2.5.7)
v1 = 0 (2.5.13)
Substituting (2.5.11) and (2.5.13) into (2.5.10), and taking A = A(T2 ) into
account, we can obtain
where cc denotes the complex conjugate term of its preceding terms and NST denotes
terms which do not generate secular terms. To eliminate the secular term, we need
1 iβ
Let A= ae (2.5.16)
2
and put (2.5.16) into (2.5.15), we can obtain
Separates the real and imaginary parts of the above equation yields
D2 a = 0 (2.5.18)
So a is a constant and
3αa2
β= T2 + β0 (2.5.20)
8ω0
3αε2 a2
x = εacos(ω0 t + t + β0 ) + · · · (2.5.21)
8ω0
2.5 Exercise 2.5 (Show the Effect of a Change in the Equilibrium Point … 33
3αa2
x = acos(ω0 t + t + β0 ) + · · · (2.5.22)
8ω0
3αa2
ω = ω0 + (2.5.23)
8ω0
k1 x + k3 (x)3 − mg = 0 (2.5.25)
Let x = y + x (2.5.26)
∼2
i.e ÿ + ω0 y + δy2 + αy3 = 0 (2.5.28)
Equation (2.5.28) can be changed to the Eq. (2.2.51) in Exercise 2.2(c), the
Eq. (2.2.51) the frequency-amplitude relationship of the oscillation is can be obtained
from (2.2.70), i.e.,
∼ 1 4δ 2
ω = ω0 − ∼ ( − 3α)a2 (2.5.30)
∼2
8ω0 3ω 0
The difference between (2.5.30) and (2.5.23) is caused by the different equilibria
of the nonlinear spring in two cases.
34 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
Solution: Considering the principle of angular impulse and momentum of the rod
about the axis of symmetry of the column wall, we can obtain
4l 2
[m + m(R2 − l 2 )]θ̈ = −mg R2 − l 2 sinθ (2.6.1)
12
g(R2 − l 2 )1/2
i.e. θ̈ + sinθ = 0 (2.6.2)
R2 − 23 l 2
When the angle θ is very small, the rod oscillates slightly around the equilibrium
position and the Eq. (2.6.2) becomes linear:
g(R2 − l 2 )1/2
θ̈ + θ =0 (2.6.3)
R2 − 23 l 2
g(R2 − l 2 )1/2
ω0 = (2.6.4)
R2 − 23 l 2
Expanding sinθ in (2.6.2) about θ = 0 and retaining to the third order term, we
can obtain
θ̈ + ω02 θ + αθ 3 = 0 (2.6.5)
where α = −ω02 /6. This equation is exactly the same as (2.5.1) in Exercise 2.5(a).
According to (2.5.23), the frequency-amplitude relationship of the oscillation is
3αa2 a2
ω = ω0 + = (1 − )ω0 (2.6.6)
8ω0 16
It can be seen that for a fixed amplitude a, the natural frequency ω of the nonlinear
osscillation is proportional to the natural frequency ω0 of the corresponding linear
oscillation. Therefore, the effect of the rod length l on ω can be reflected by the
ω0 ∼ l relationship, shown in Fig. 2.2. Here we rewrite (2.6.4) as
ω0 [1 − (l/R)2 ]1/2
√ = (2.6.7)
g/R 1 − 23 (l/R)2
It is shown that the natural frequency increases slowly with the increase of the
rod length l, and then decreases sharply after reaching the maximum value.
2.7 Exercise 2.7 (Period of the Osscillation Motion of a Single … 35
1 1 1 2 (R − r) 2
K= m[(R − r)θ̇]2 + mr [ θ̇ ]
2 22 r
13
= m(R − r)2 θ̇ 2 (2.7.1)
22
The kinetic energy of the cylinder, V , is
Substituting them into Lagrange’s equation, we can write the differential equation
of motion of the cylinder as follows
3
m(R − r)2 θ̈ + mg(R − r)sinθ = 0
2
2g
θ̈ + sinθ = 0 (2.7.3)
3(R − r)
1 2 2g
θ̇ − cosθ = E (2.7.4)
2 3(R − r)
36 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
where E is the total energy of the cylinder. The minimum angular velocity of the
cylinder at point A is θ̇ (π ) = 0, then
2g
E= (2.7.5)
3(R − r)
1 2 2g 2g
θ̇ − cos θ = (2.7.6)
2 3(R − r) 3(R − r)
Then the angular velocity of the cylinder at the bottom (θ = 0) can be obtained
from the above equation
8g
θ̇ = (2.7.7)
3(R − r)
(c) The motion of the cylinder is controlled by the Eq. (2.7.6), i.e.,
4g
θ̇ = (1 + cosθ ) (2.7.8)
3(R − r)
Therefore, the time required for the cylinder to travel around the circular orbit, T ,
is
π π
dθ 4g
T =2 =2 [ (1 + cosθ )]−1/2 d θ
θ̇ 3(R − r)
0 0
π
3(R − r) dθ 3(R − r) θ π
= = tan
g 1 + cosθ g 2 0
0
=∞ (2.7.9)
which is infinite because the highest point A of the circular orbit is the saddle point
of the cylinder’s motion and the cylinder needs to take infinite time to approach the
saddle point.
1 1
T= m(ẋ2 + ż 2 + 2 x2 ) = m[(1 + 4p2 x2 )ẋ2 + ψ̇ 2 x2 ] (2.8.1)
2 2
The differential equation of the motion of the system can be obtained by using
Lagrange’s equation:
mψ̈x2 + 2mψ̇ ẋx = 0
m(1 + 4p2 x2 )ẍ + 4mp2 xẋ2 − mψ̇ 2 x = −2mgpx
˙
i.e.x + 2ẋ = 0 (2.8.3)
√
x2 = H (2.8.5)
The left side of the above equation represents the angular momentum of the
system about the z-axis, so the above equation actually implies the conservation
of the angular momentum of the system. Solving from the above equation and
substituting it into (2.8.4), we can obtain the governing equation of the system
H
(1 + 4p2 x2 )ẍ + 4p2 xẋ2 + (2pg − )x = 0 (2.8.6)
x4
H
ẍ = −[4p2 xẋ2 + (2pg − )x]/(1 + 4p2 x2 ) (2.8.7)
x4
Let v = ẋ (2.8.8)
H
then v̇ = ẍ = −[4p2 xv2 + (2pg − )x]/(1 + 4p2 x2 ) (2.8.9)
x4
from which it follows immediately that
38 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
Now we can discuss the motion of the particle with initial condition H = H0 and
h = h0 .
(1) H0 = 0
Now Eq. (2.8.11) can be written as
h0 − 2pgx2
v2 = (2.8.12)
1 + 4p2 x2
h0
h0 − 2pgx2 ≥ 0 ⇒ |x| ≤ (2.8.13)
2pg
So v2 ≤ h0 (2.8.14)
(2) H0 = 0
Now the Eq. (2.8.11) can be written as
h0 − 2pgx2 − H0 x−2
v2 = (2.8.15)
1 + 4p2 x2
i.e.,
h0 − h20 − 8pgH0 h0 + h20 − 8pgH0
≤ x2 ≤ (2.8.17)
4pg 4pg
(d) Let p = 1, g = 32.2, h = 1000, H = 12, we can write the Eq. (2.8.11) as
1
T= m(r 2 θ̇ 2 + 2 r 2 sin2 θ ) (2.9.1)
2
The potential energy of the system V is
The differential equation of the motion of the pendulum can be obtained by using
Lagrange’s equation:
d 2θ
mr 2 − m2 r 2 sinθ cosθ = −mgrsinθ
dt 2
d 2θ g
i.e. − 2 sinθ cosθ + sinθ = 0 (2.9.3)
dt 2 r
(2.9.3) changes to
1 2 1
E= θ̇ − (1 − )
2 0 2
1 1
Let F(θ ) = 1 − − (1 − cosθ )cosθ (2.9.7)
2 2
1 1
then θ̇ 2 = θ̇02 − F(θ ) (2.9.8)
2 2
From the Eq. (2.9.5) it is known that the equilibrium point of the system is
≤ 1; θ = 0, π (or − π ) (2.9.9)
where θ = arccos(1/).
2.9 Exercise 2.9 (A Single Pendulum Rotating Uniformly Around a Plumb … 41
The potential energy curve and phase trajectories when ≤ 1 are shown in
Fig. 2.4a and b. The equilibrium point θ = 0 is the center, while θ = π (or − π ) is
the saddle point. The potential curve and phase trajectories when > 1 are shown
in Fig. 2.4c. The equilibrium points θ = 0 and θ = π (or − π ) are the saddle points,
while the equilibrium point θ = ±θ = ±arccos(1/) is the center. From above
results, it is clear that = 1 is the bifurcation point.
(c) Assuming > 1, the center of the system is
(a) (b)
(c)
Fig. 2.4 a Potential energy curve and phase trajectories when = 0.5. b Potential energy curve
and phase trajectories when = 1 c Potential energy curve and phase trajectories when = 3 for
Exercise 2.9
42 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
0 = θ̈ + [1 − cos(θ + θ )]sin(θ + θ )
= θ̈ + sinθ + θ cosθ − 21 θ 2 sinθ − 16 θ 3 cosθ
− 21 [sin2θ + 2θ cos2θ − 21 (2θ )2 sin2θ − 16 (2θ )3 cos2θ ] (2.9.12)
= θ + (sin2 θ )θ + (sin2θ − 21 sinθ )θ 2
+( 23 cos2θ − 16 cosθ )θ 3
1 2 1
Let ω02 = sin2 θ , α = sin2θ − sinθ , δ = cos2θ − cosθ
2 3 6
(2.9.13)
(2.9.14) becomes
θ̈ + ω02 θ + αθ 2 + δθ 3 = 0 (2.9.14)
Let
θ = ελ v (2.9.15)
1 4δ 2
ω = ω0 − ( − 3α)a2 (2.9.17)
8ω0 3ω02
(d) Assuming < 1, the center of the system is the origin. We carry out the expansion
of the Eq. (2.9.5) about the origin to O( 3 ) and obtain
1 1
θ̈ + [1 − (1 − θ 2 + · · · )](θ − θ 3 ) = 0
2 6
¨ + (1 − )θ + ( 2 − 1 )θ 3 = 0
i.e.θ (2.9.18)
3 6
2 1
let ω20 = 1 − , α1 = − (2.9.19)
3 6
2.10 Exercise 2.10 (A Single Pendulum Rotating Freely Around a Plumb Axis) 43
3α1 a2
ω = ω0 + (2.9.20)
8ω0
1
T= m(r 2 θ̇ 2 + 2 r 2 sin2 θ ) (2.10.1)
2
V = −mgrcosθ (2.10.2)
The differential equations of the motion of the pendulum can be obtained by using
Lagrange’s equation:
r 2 sin2 θ
˙ + 2r 2 sinθ cosθ θ̇ = 0
(2.10.3)
θ̈ + ( gr − 2 cosθ )sinθ = 0
g
θ̈ + ( − 2 cosθ )sinθ = 0 (2.10.6)
r
g cotθ
θ̈ + (sinθ − 2 ) = 0 (2.10.7)
r sin θ
44 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
where = H /(gr 3 ).
This result is different from the one the question asks us to prove! Therefore, this
question is not solved furthermore.
Solution: (a) Let the instantaneous position coordinates of the mass m2 be y, then
there is a constraint relation
x2 + y2 = l 2 (2.11.1)
x
So ẏ = − ẋ (2.11.2)
y
1 1 1 1 x2
T= m1 ẋ2 + m2 ẏ2 = m1 ẋ2 + m2 2 ẋ2
2 2 2 2 y
2
1 1 x
= m1 ẋ2 + m2 ẋ2 (2.11.3)
2 2 l 2 − x2
1 1
V = m2 gy + kx2 = m2 g l 2 − x2 + kx2 (2.11.4)
2 2
Then the governing equation of the system can be obtained by using Lagrange’s
equation
m2 x2 m2 l 2 xẋ2 x
(m1 + )ẍ + + kx + m2 g =0 (2.11.5)
l 2 − x2 (l − x )
2 2 2
(l − x2 )1/2
2
(b) Let R = m2 /m1 and u = x/l, from the Eq. (2.11.5), we obtain
For |u| << 1, expanding the last term on the left side of the above equation and
retaining it to the third-order yields
Rg 3
(1 + Ru2 )ü + Ruu̇2 + ω02 u + u =0 (2.11.7)
2l
where
k Rg
ω02 = +
m1 l
(c) Let
u = εv (2.11.8)
Rg 3
v̈ + ω02 v + ε2 (Rv2 v̈ + Rvv̇2 + v )=0 (2.11.9)
2l
We seek an expansion of the solution with the following form
Rg 3
0 = v̈ + ω02 v + ε2 (Rv2 v̈ + Rvv̇2 +
v )
2l
= [D0 + 2εD0 D1 + ε (D1 + 2D0 D2 ) + · · · ](v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 + · · · )
2 2 2
v1 = 0 (2.11.17)
Substituting (2.11.15) and (2.11.17) into (2.11.14), and taking A = A(T2 ) into
account, we obtain
3Rg 2
D02 v2 + ω02 v2 = −2iω0 D2 A + 2Rω02 A2 Aeiω0 T0 − 2l
A Aeiω0 T0
(2.11.18)
+cc + NST
where cc denotes the complex conjugate term of its preceding terms and NST denotes
terms which do not generate secular terms. In order to eliminate the secular term, we
need
3g 2
2iω0 D2 A − R(2ω02 − )A A = 0 (2.11.19)
2l
1 iβ
Let A = ae (2.11.20)
2
Substitute (2.11.20) into (2.11.19), we obtain
R 3g 3
iω0 D2 a − ω0 aD2 β − (2ω02 − )a = 0 (2.11.21)
8 2l
Separates the real and imaginary parts of the above equation yields
D2 a = 0 (2.11.22)
R 3g 2
D2 β + (2ω02 − )a = 0 (2.11.23)
8ω0 2l
R 3g 2
β=− (2ω02 − )a T2 + β0 (2.11.24)
8ω0 2l
R 3g 2 2
u = εacos[ω0 t − (2ω02 − )a ε t + β0 ] + · · · (2.11.25)
8ω0 2l
Let ε = 1,
R 3g 2
u = acos[ω0 t − (2ω02 − )a t + β0 ] + · · · (2.11.26)
8ω0 2l
R 3g 2
ω = ω0 − (2ω02 − )a (2.11.27)
8ω0 2l
Solution: (a) Let the length of the oblique segment of the rope hanging mass m1 is
x, then there is a constraint
x2 = l 2 + y2 (2.12.1)
y
ẋ = ẏ (2.12.2)
x
The kinetic energy of the system, T , is
1 1 1 y2
T = 2 × m1 ẋ2 + m2 ẏ2 = (2m1 2 + m2 )ẏ2
2 2 2 x
1 2m1 y2 2
= (m2 + 2 )ẏ (2.12.3)
2 l + y2
Then calculate the generalized force of the system. For a given virtual displace-
ment δy, we can obtain from (2.12.1) that
y
δx = δy (2.12.4)
x
The virtual work of the system is
48 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
2m1 gy
δW = −2m1 gδx + m2 gδy = (− + m2 g)δy
x
Therefore, the generalized force of the system is
2m1 gy 2m1 gy
Q=− + m2 g = m2 g − (2.12.5)
x (l + y2 )1/2
2
Substitute (2.12.3) and (2.12.5) into Lagrange’s equation, we can obtain the
governing equation of the system
(b) The equilibria of the system can be obtained from (2.12.6) by letting ẏ = ÿ = 0,
i.e.,
2m1 gy
m2 g − =0 (2.12.7)
(l 2+ y2 )1/2
then
lm2
ye = , (assume )2m1 > m2 (2.12.8)
4m21 − m22
(d) Let
ye ye
u= + ηor u = ue + η, where ue = (2.12.10)
l l
Substituting this into (2.12.9) and taking (2.12.7) into account, we can obtain
2Rg
− η[1 + (ue + η)2 ]3/2 = η̈[1 + (ue + η)2 ]2
l
Expanding
the left side of the equation for the small and finite |η|, retaining to
O η3 yields
where b2 = 1 + ue2 . Expanding the right-hand side of the equation and retaining to
O η3 , we obtain
η̈[1 + (ue + η)2 ]2 + 2R(ue + η){[1 + (ue + η)2 ](ue + η)η̈ + η̇2 }
= η̈(b2 + 2ue η + η2 )2 + 2R(ue + η)[(b2 + 2ue η + η2 )(ue + η)η̈ + η̇2 ]
= η̈(b4 + 4b2 ue η + 4ue2 η2 + 2b2 η2 )
+ 2R(ue + η)(b2 ue η̈ + 2ue2 ηη̈ + ue η2 η̈ + b2 ηη̈ + 2ue η2 η̈ + η̇2 )
= b4 η̈ + 4b2 ue ηη̈ + 4ue2 η2 η̈ + 2b2 η2 η̈
+ 2Rb2 ue2 η̈ + 4Rue3 ηη̈ + 2Rue2 η2 η̈ + 2Rb2 ue ηη̈ + 4Rue2 η2 η̈ + 2Rue η̇2
+ 2Rb2 ue η̈η + 4Rue2 η2 η̈ + 2Rb2 η̈η2 + 2Rη̇2 η
= (b4 + 2Rb2 ue2 )η̈ + (4b2 ue + 4Rue3 + 4Rb2 ue )η̈η + 2Rue η̇2
+ (2b2 + 4ue2 + 10Rue2 + 2Rb2 )η̈η2 + 2Rη̇2 η
2Rb3 g 6Rbue g
η̈ + η+ η2
+ 2Rb ue )
l(b4 2 2 l(b + 2Rb2 ue2 )
4
2Rue 3Rbg
+ 4 η̇2 + (1 + b−2 ue2 )η3
(b + 2Rb ue )
2 2 l(b + 2Rb2 ue2 )
4
where
3
ω02 = l(b42Rb g
+2Rb2 ue2 )
6Rbue g
α1 = l(b4 +2Rb2 u2 )
e
α2 = (b4 +2Rb
2Rue
2 u2 )
e
(4b2 ue +4Rue3 +4Rb2 ue )
α3 = (b4 +2Rb2 ue2 )
(2.12.13)
α4 = 3Rbg
l(b +2Rb2 ue2 )
4 (1 + b−2 ue2 )
α5 = 2R
(b4 +2Rb2 ue2 )
(2b +4ue2 +10Rue2 +2Rb2 )
2
α6 = (b4 +2Rb2 ue2 )
Let
η = εv (2.12.14)
× (v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 + · · · )
+ ε2 α6 {[D02 + 2εD0 D1 + ε2 (D12 + 2D0 D2 ) + · · · ](v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 + · · · )}
× (v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 + · · · )2
= D02 v0 + ω02 v0
+ ε[D02 v1 + 2D0 D1 v0 + ω02 v1 + α1 v02 + α2 (D0 v0 )2 + α3 v0 D02 v0 ]
+ ε2 [D02 v2 + 2D0 D1 v1 + (D12 + 2D0 D2 )v0 + ω02 v2 + 2α1 v0 v1
+ α2 D0 v0 (D0 v1 + D1 v0 ) + α3 v0 (D12 v1 + 2D0 D2 v0 )
+ α4 v03 + α5 v0 (D0 v0 )2 + α6 v02 D02 v0 ] + · · · (2.12.17)
v1 = B1 AA + B2 A2 e2iω0 T0 + cc (2.12.23)
Substituting (2.12.21) and (2.12.23) into (2.12.20) and taking A = A(T2 ) into
account, we can obtain
52 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
where cc denotes the complex conjugate term of its preceding terms and NST denotes
terms which do not generate secular terms. In order to eliminate secular terms, it is
necessary to have
2iω0 D2 A + (2α1 B1 + 2α1 B2 + 2α2 ω02 B2 + 3α4 + α5 ω02 − 3α6 ω02 )A2 A = 0
(2.12.26)
1 iβ
Let A= ae (2.12.27)
2
Substitute (2.12.27) into (2.12.26), we obtain
iω0 D2 a − ω0 aD2 β
1
+ (2α1 B1 + 2α1 B2 + 2α2 ω02 B2 + 3α4 + α5 ω02 − 3α6 ω02 )a3 = 0 (2.12.28)
8
Separate the real and imaginary parts of the above equation yields
D2 a = 0 (2.12.29)
1
−ω0 aD2 β + (2α1 B1 + 2α1 B2 + 2α2 ω02 B2 + 3α4 + α5 ω02 − 3α6 ω02 )a3 = 0
8
(2.12.30)
D 2
β= a T2 + β0 (2.12.31)
8ω0
where D = 2α1 B1 + 2α1 B2 + 2α2 ω02 B2 + 3α4 + α5 ω02 − 3α6 ω02 (2.12.32)
Combining the above results, the first-order approximation of the solution of the
original equation can be written as
D 2 2
η = εacos(ω0 t + a ε t + β0 ) + · · · (2.12.33)
8ω0
D 2
η = acos(ω0 t + a t + β0 ) + · · · (2.12.34)
8ω0
2.13 Exercise 2.13 (Single Pendulum Attached … 53
D 2
ω = ω0 + a (2.12.35)
8ω0
1 1
T= m(l θ̇ cosθ − θ̇ r)2 + m(l θ̇ sinθ )2
2 2
1
= m(l 2 + r 2 − 2rlcosθ )θ̇ 2 (2.13.1)
2
The potential energy of the system is
V = −mglcosθ (2.13.2)
gl rl rl gl
θ̈ + θ+ θ 2 θ̈ + θ̇ 2 θ − θ3 = 0 (2.13.4)
(l − r) 2
(l − r)2
(l − r) 2
6(l − r)2
gl rl
Let ω02 = , α= (2.13.5)
(l − r)2
(l − r)2
ω02 3
then θ̈ + ω02 θ + αθ 2 θ̈ + α θ̇ 2 θ − θ =0 (2.13.6)
6
Let
θ = εv (2.13.7)
ω02 3
v̈ + ω02 v + ε2 αv2 v̈ + ε2 α v̇2 v − ε2 v =0 (2.13.8)
6
We seek an expansion of the following form for the solution of (2.13.8)
ω02 3
0 = v̈ + ω02 v + ε2 αv2 v̈ + ε2 α v̇2 v − ε2
v
6
= [D02 + 2εD0 D1 + ε2 (D12 + 2D0 D2 ) + · · · ](v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 + · · · )
+ ω02 (v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 + · · · )
ω02 3
+ ε2 [αv02 D02 v0 + αv0 (D0 v0 )2 − v + ···]
6 0
= D02 v0 + ω02 v0 + ε(D02 v1 + 2D0 D1 v0 + ω02 v1 )
+ ε2 [D02 v2 + 2D0 D1 v1 + (D12 + 2D0 D2 )v0 + ω02 v2
ω02 3
+ αv02 D02 v0 + αv0 (D0 v0 )2 − v ] + ··· (2.13.10)
6 0
Let the coefficients of the same power of ε be zeros to obtain
v1 = 0 (2.13.16)
2.13 Exercise 2.13 (Single Pendulum Attached … 55
Substituting (2.11.15) and (2.11.17) into (2.11.14), and taking A = A(T2 ) into
account, we can obtain
1
−2iω0 D2 A + 2αω02 A2 A + ω02 A2 A = 0 (2.13.18)
2
1 iβ
Let A = ae (2.13.19)
2
Substitute (2.11.20) into (2.11.19), we obtain
1
iω0 D2 a − ω0 aD2 β − ω02 ( α + 4)a3 = 0 (2.13.20)
4
Separate the real and imaginary parts of the above equation yields
D2 a = 0 (2.13.21)
1
D2 β − ω0 ( α + 4)a2 = 0 (2.13.22)
4
So a is a constant. By integrating (2.11.23), we can obtain
1
β = ω0 ( α + 4)a2 T2 + β0 (2.13.23)
4
Combining the above results, the first-order approximate Solution is obtained as
1
u = εacos[ω0 t + ω0 ( α + 4)a2 ε2 t + β0 ] + · · · (2.13.24)
4
Let ε = 1, we can obtain
1
u = acos[ω0 t + ω0 ( α + 4)a2 t + β0 ] + · · · (2.13.25)
4
Then the frequency-amplitude relationship of the oscillation is
56 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
1
ω = ω0 + ω0 ( α + 4)a2 (2.13.26)
4
1 1
T= m(l θ̇ cosθ − θ̇ r)2 + m(l θ̇ sinθ )2
2 2
1
= m(l 2 + r 2 − 2rlcosθ )θ̇ 2 (2.14.1)
2
The potential energy of the system is
1
V = −mglcosθ + k(rθ )2 (2.14.2)
2
Using Lagrange’s equation, we can obtain the differential equation of the motion
of the system
gl + kr 2 /m rl rl gl
θ̈ + θ+ θ 2 θ̈ + θ̇ 2 θ − θ3 = 0 (2.14.4)
(l − r)2 (l − r)2 (l − r)2 6(l − r)2
gl + kr 2 /m rl
Let ω02 = , α= (2.14.5)
(l − r) 2
(l − r)2
¨ + ω02 θ + αθ 2 θ̈ + α θ̇ 2 θ − 1 ω02 θ 3 = 0
thenθ (2.14.6)
6
This equation is the same as the governing equation in Exercise 2.13, except that
the value of ω02 is taken differently. Therefore, the relationship between the oscillation
frequency ω and the amplitude a is the same as in Exercise 2.13, i.e.,
1
ω = ω0 + ω0 ( α + 4)a2 (2.14.7)
4
2.16 Exercise 2.16 (Simplified Model for Buckling Analysis of Columns) 57
Solution: (a) When there is no collision, the whole motion of the system is controlled
by the equation θ + θ = 0, so that its energy equation is
θ ‘2 + θ 2 = 2E (2.15.1)
where E is the total energy. Therefore, the trajectories in the θ ∼ θ̇ phase plane are
a family of circles with different initial conditions (E).
(b) When there is an inelastic collision, let the coefficient of restitution be μ < 1,
then the governing equation of the system is
θ = α : θ “ + sin θ = 0
θ ‘ (α) (2.15.2)
θ = α, θ̇ (α) < 0 : −θ2 ‘ (α) = μ
1
where θ1 , θ2 associated with the angular velocity of the pendulum before and after
the collision, respectively. Then the trajectories of the system are governed by
√
θ = α : θ ‘ = ± 2(E + cos θ )
(2.15.3)
θ = α, θ̇ (α) < 0 : θ2‘ (α) = −μθ1‘ (α)
Figure 2.5a–c present the trajectories of the sysstem for (1) α > 0, (2) α = 0 and
(3) α < 0, respectively.
Figure 2.5a and b (α ≥ 0): the ball will always impact the wall with energy loss
and velocity decreasing, and finally rest against the wall.
Figure 2.5c (α < 0): the ball will impact the wall at the beginning, then the speed
will decrease and the energy will be lost, finally the speed will be zero when the ball
reaches the wall.
1 2
T= mẋ (2.16.1)
2
The potential energy of the system is
58 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
(a) (b)
(c)
Fig. 2.5 a Phase trajectories of the ball at α > 15◦ (θ0 = 30◦ , θ0 = 0, μ = 0.8). b Phase
◦
trajectories of the ball at α = 0 (θ0 = 30◦ , θ0 = 0, μ = 0.8). c Phase trajectories of the ball at
◦ ◦
α > −15 (θ0 = 30 , θ0 = 0, μ = 0.8) for Exercise 2.16
x
V = Fspring dx − 2 × P(l − l 2 − x2 )
0
x
= Fspring dx + 2P l 2 − x2 − 2Pl (2.16.2)
0
Substituting the kinetic energy and potential energy into the Lagrange’s equation,
we obtain
∂V 2Px
mẍ = − = −Fspring + √
∂x l 2 − x2
2Px
i.e. mẍ + k1 x + k3 x3 − √ + ··· = 0 (2.16.3)
l 2 − x2
Expanding the fourth term on the left-hand side of (2.16.4) and keeping it to O(x 3 ),
we obtain
2P P
mẍ + k1 x + k3 x3 − ( x + 3 x3 ) = 0
l l
2P P
i.e. mẍ + (k1 − )x + (k3 − 3 )x3 = 0 (2.16.4)
l l
1 2P 1 P
Let α1 = (k1 − ), α3 = (k3 − 3 ) (2.16.5)
m l m l
then (2.16.4) becomes
ẍ + α1 x + α3 x3 = 0 (2.16.6)
α1 < 0 : u − u + αu3 = 0 (2.16.9)
After integration, the energy equation and the phase trajectories are obtained as
1
u‘2 + V (u) = E, where V (u) = 21 u2 + 41 αu4
α1 ≥ 0 : 2 √ (2.16.10)
u‘ = ± 2(E − V (u))
1
u‘2 + V (u) = E, where V (u) = − 21 u2 + 41 αu4
α1 < 0 : 2 √ (2.16.11)
u‘ = ± 2(E − V (u))
From (2.16.10) and (2.16.11) the potential energy curve V (u) ∼ u and the phase
trajectories can be calculated and plotted, as shown in Fig. 2.6a and b. The equilibrium
point x = 0 is the center when α1 > 0 while the saddle point when α1 < 0. Therefore,
α1 = 0 is the bifurcation point of the system, i.e., the column is buckled under this
condition. Thus, the buckling load Pb can be obtained from Eq. (2.16.5)
60 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
(a) (b)
Fig. 2.6 a Potential energy curve and phase trajectories (α1 > 0, α = 0.2). b Potential energy
curve and phase trajectories (α1 < 0, α = 0.2) for Exercise 2.16
1
Pb = k1 l (2.16.12)
2
Solution: (a) Assume that the rod is balanced at the vertex of the cylindrical surface.
The kinetic energy of the rod is
1 1 2
T= ( ml + mr 2 θ 2 )θ̇ 2 (2.17.1)
2 12
The potential energy of the rod is
Substituting the kinetic energy and potential energy into the Lagrange’s equation,
we obtain
1 2
( ml + mr 2 θ 2 )θ̈ + mr 2 θ θ̇ 2 = −mgrθ cosθ
12
That is, the differential equation of motion of the rod is
2.17 Exercise 2.17 (Rods for Pure Rolling on a Fixed Cylindrical Surface) 61
1 2
( l + r 2 θ 2 )θ̈ + r 2 θ θ̇ 2 + grθ cosθ = 0 (2.17.3)
12
(b) We expand the Eq. (2.17.3) around the equilibrium point θ = 0 and expand it,
retaining to O(θ 3 ), to obtain
1 2 1
( l + r 2 θ 2 )θ̈ + r 2 θ θ̇ 2 + grθ − grθ 3 = 0 (2.17.4)
12 2
1
¨
well sorted θ + ω02 θ + αθ 2 θ̈ + αθ θ̇ 2 − ω02 θ 3 = 0 (2.17.5)
2
12rg 12r 2
where ω02 = , α = (2.17.6)
l2 l2
Let
θ = εv (2.17.7)
ω02 3
v̈ + ω02 v + ε2 αv2 v̈ + ε2 α v̇2 v − ε2 v =0 (2.17.8)
2
We seek an expansion of solution with the following form near the singularity
v=0
ω02 3
0 = v̈ + ω02 v + ε2 αv2 v̈ + ε2 α v̇2 v − ε2
v
2
= [D02 + 2εD0 D1 + ε2 (D12 + 2D0 D2 ) + · · · ](v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 + · · · )
+ ω02 (v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 + · · · )
ω02 3
+ ε2 [αv02 D02 v0 + αv0 (D0 v0 )2 − v + ···]
2 0
= D02 v0 + ω02 v0 + ε(D02 v1 + 2D0 D1 v0 + ω02 v1 )
+ ε2 [D02 v2 + 2D0 D1 v1 + (D12 + 2D0 D2 )v0 + ω02 v2
ω02 3
+ αv02 D02 v0 + αv0 (D0 v0 )2 − v ] + ··· (2.17.10)
2 0
Retaining the equation to O(ε2 ) and equate the coefficients of the same power of
ε to be zero gives
62 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
where A = A(T1 , T2 ). Substituting the above equation into the Eq. (2.17.12), we
obtain
v1 = 0 (2.17.16)
Substitute (2.17.14) and (2.17.16) into (2.17.13), and take A = A(T2 ) into account,
we obtain
3ω02 2
−2iω0 D2 A + 2αω02 A2 A + A A=0 (2.17.18)
2
1 iβ
Let A= ae (2.17.19)
2
Put (2.17.19) into (2.17.18), we obtain
1
iω0 D2 a − ω0 aD2 β − ω02 ( α + 12)a3 = 0 (2.17.20)
4
2.18 Exercise 2.18 (Geometrically Nonlinear System Formed by a Linear … 63
Separate the real and imaginary parts of the above equation yields
D2 a = 0 (2.17.21)
1
D2 β − ω0 ( α + 12)a2 = 0 (2.17.22)
4
So a is a constant. Integrate (2.17.22) directly, we obtain
1
β = ω0 ( α + 12)a2 T2 + β0 (2.17.23)
4
Combining the above results, the first-order approximation of the solution is
obtained as
1
u = εacos[ω0 t + ω0 ( α + 12)a2 ε2 t + β0 ] + · · · (2.17.24)
4
Let ε = 1, we can obtain
1
u = acos[ω0 t + ω0 ( α + 12)a2 t + β0 ] + · · · (2.17.25)
4
Therefore, the frequency-amplitude relationship of the oscillation is
1
ω = ω0 + ω0 ( α + 12)a2 (2.17.26)
4
1 2
T= mẋ (2.18.1)
2
The potential energy of the system is
1
V = k[(x2 + l 2 )1/2 − l ]2 (2.18.2)
2
Substituting the kinetic energy and potential energy into the Lagrange’s equation,
the differential equation of motion of the system is
64 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
ẍ k x x2 x2 l
+ (1 + 2 )−1/2 [(1 + 2 )1/2 − ] = 0
l ml l l l
Let
k x l
2ω2 = , u = , L = , τ = ωt
m l l
The equation becomes
2Lu
or ü + 2u − √ =0 (2.18.5)
1 + u2
Note that the derivatives are obtained for the dimensionless time variable τ , i.e.
u̇ = du/d τ .
(b) Integrate the Eq. (2.18.5), we can obtain the energy equation
1 2
u̇ + V (u) = E, V (u) = u2 − 2L 1 + u2 (2.18.6)
2
Sou̇ = ± 2[E − V (u)] (2.18.7)
The potential energy curve and the phase trajectories are shown in Fig. 2.7a–c.
The equilibrium point u = 0 is a center when L ≤ 1 while a saddle point when L > 1
is unstable; two new equilibrium points are created at the same time.
(c) Expand the Eq. (2.18.5), retaining to O(u3 ), to obtain
1
ü + 2u − 2Lu(1 − u2 + · · · ) = 0
2
For L = 1,
ü + u3 = 0 when L = 1 (2.18.9)
(a) (b)
(c)
Fig. 2.7 Potential energy curves and solution trajectories when a L = 0.5, b L = 1 and c L = 1.5
for Exercise 2.18(b)
d u̇ 1 2 1 4
dτ = − , u̇ + u = E (2.18.10)
u3 2 4
If the movement starts at −u0 ,
1 4 √ u3 du
E= u0 , d u̇ = − 2
4 (u4 − u4 )
0
√
u
du
τ= 2 (2.18.11)
−u0 (u04 − u4 )
√ θ θ
2 sinϕd ϕ 1 dϕ 1 1
τ= = F( , θ ) (2.18.13)
u0 1 − cos ϕ
4 u0 1 − 21 sin2 ϕ u0 2
0 0
where cosθ = −u/u0 ;F(κ, θ ) are the first class of elliptic integrals defined as
θ
dϕ
F(κ, θ ) =
1 − κ 2 sin2 ϕ
0
4 1 π 4 7.4448
T= F( , ) = × 1.8612 ≈ (2.18.14)
u0 2 2 u0 u0
u = u0 cos(ωτ + β) u0 cosψ
2π 4π 7.2552
T= = √ ≈ (2.19.1)
ω u0 3 u0
7.4448 − 7.2552
error = = 2.5%
7.4448
(b) By expanding the integrand integrating term by term, refer to (f) in Exercise 2.18,
we obtain
1 1 1 3 1 5 1
= 1 + ( sin2 φ) + ( sin2 φ)2 + ( sin2 φ)3 + · · ·
(1 − 1
2
sin2 φ)1/2 2 2 8 2 16 2
1 3 5
= 1 + sin2 φ + sin4 φ + sin6 φ + · · ·
4 32 128
Substituting this into the equation (f) in Exercise 2.18, the period of oscillation
of the system can be obtained as
π/2
4 1 3 5
T= (1 + sin2 ϕ + sin4 ϕ + sin6 ϕ + · · · )d ϕ (2.19.2)
u0 4 32 128
0
π/2
T= 4
u0
(1 + 41 sin2 φ + 3
32
sin4 φ)d φ
0
4 π π (2.19.3)
= ( + 41
u0 2
· 4
+ 3
32
· 3π
16
) = 297π
128u0
≈ 7.2895
u0
u = acos(ωt + β) acosψ
Solution: The average of integrated square of the error over a time interval T is given
by
T
1
e= (λx − x3 )2 d τ < (λx − x3 )2 ≥ λ2 x2 − 2λ x4 + x6
T
0
de
= 2λ < x2 > −2 < x4 > = 0
dλ
T
2π
cos4 (ωτ +β)d τ cos4 ψd ψ
<x4 >
λ= <x2 >
= u02 0T = u02 2π
0
cos2 (ωτ +β)d τ cos2 ψd ψ
0 0
Solution: (a) Substituting the hypothetical solution (b) into (a), the residual can be
obtained as
2π/ω
1 3
R = {( u03 − ω2 u0 )2
2
cos2 (ωτ + β)d τ
T 4
0
2π/ω
1 3
+ u03 ( u03 − ω2 u0 ) cos(ωτ + β)cos(3ωτ + 3β)d τ
2 4
0
2π/ω
1 6
+ u cos2 (3ωτ + 3β)d τ }
16 0
0
1 3 1
= ( u03 − ω2 u0 )2 + u06 (2.22.1)
2 4 32
d <R2 >
du0
= ( 43 u03 − ω2 u0 )( 49 u02 − ω2 ) + 3 5
u
16 0
= 16 u0 − 49 ω2 u03 − 43 ω2 u03 + ω4 u0 +
27 5 3 5
u
16 0
= 15 u5 − 3ω2 u03 + ω4 u0 = 0
8 0
So
1 √
ω= ( 6 ± 6)u0
2
The root with the positive sign maximizes < R2 > and must be discarded. The
other root is not in agreement with the result obtained by the method of harmonic
balance and equivalent linearization in Exercises 2.20 & 2.21.
70 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
(b) Instead of minimizing < R2 > with respect to u0 , if < R2 > is minimized with
respect to ω, we have
d < R2 > 3
= −2ωu0 ( u03 − ω2 ) = 0
dω 4
So
√
3
ω= u0
2
(c) Instead of minimizing < R2 >, R is made orthogonal to the assumed solution,
i.e.,
T
0 =< Ru0 cos(ωτ + β) >= 1
T
Ru0 cos(ωτ + β)d τ
0
2π 2π
= 1
[u ( 3 u3
Tω 0 4 0
− ω2 u0 ) cos2 ψd ψ + 41 u04 cosψcos3ψd ψ
0 0
= 21 ( 43 u03 − ω2 u0 )
√
So ω = 23 u0
This result is identical to that obtained by the harmonic balance method and the
equivalent linearization method shown in Exercises 2.20, 2.21. This method is the
Galerkin method.
Solution: Let
u = εv
The equation u + u3 = 0 changes to
v + ε2 v3 = 0 (2.23.1)
We seek an expansion of the solution with the following form near the singularity
v=0
0 = v̈ + ε2 v3
= [D02 + 2εD0 D1 + ε2 (D12 + 2D0 D2 ) + · · · ](v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 + · · · )
+ ε2 (v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 + · · · )3
= D02 v0 + ε(D02 v1 + 2D0 D1 v0 )
+ ε2 [D02 v2 + 2D0 D1 v1 + (D12 + 2D0 D2 )v0 + v03 ] + · · · (2.23.3)
Retaining the above equation to the order of ε2 and equating coefficients of the
same power of ε gives
D02 v0 = 0 (2.23.4)
In order not to generate secular terms, this set of equations has only zero solutions.
Therefore, we do not get the expression for v. The reason is that, according
to the above scheme, the ε0 order in Eq. (2.23.4) is not an oscillational equation,
and therefore, the final oscillational solution of v cannot be formed. Therefore, the
equation u + u3 = 0 cannot be solved by the the method of multiple scales.
Solution: (a) As known from Exercise 2.18, the differential equation of motion of
the system is
u + 2u(1 + u2 )−1/2 [(1 + u2 )1/2 − L] = 0
And from the answer to Exercise 2.18(c), the above equation has been expanded
to O(u3 ) as
u + 2(1 − L)u + Lu3 = 0
1 1
u + u + u3 = 0, when L = (2.24.1)
2 2
72 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
1 ‘2 1 2 1 4
u + u + u =E
2 2 8
When the initial condition is u = −u0 , u = 0
1 2 1 4
E= u + u
2 0 8 0
1 1
So u =
‘
(u02 − u2 ) + (u04 − u4 ) = (u02 − u2 )(4 + u02 + u2 ) (2.24.2)
4 2
u u
du du
τ= =2 (2.24.3)
u‘ (u02 − u2 )(4 + u02 + u2 )
−u0 −u0
θ θ
u0 sinϕd ϕ dϕ
τ =2 =2
0 u02 (1 − cos2 ϕ)(4 + u02 + u02 cos2 ϕ) 0 (4 + 2u02 − u02 sin2 ϕ)
θ
2 dϕ
=
4 + 2u02 (1 − k 2 sin2 ϕ)
0
θ
2 dϕ
i.e. τ = (2.24.4)
4 + 2u02 (1 − k 2 sin2 ϕ)
0
where k 2 = u02 /(4 + 2u02 ). Therefore, the period of oscillation of the system is
π/2
8 dϕ
T= (2.24.5)
4 + 2u02 (1 − k 2 sin2 ϕ)
0
R = α1 x + α3 x3 − λx
T
1
R2 = (α1 x + α3 x3 − λx)2 dt
T
0
= (α1 − λ)2 x2 + 2α3 (α1 − λ) x4 + α32 x6
d < R2 >
= −2(α1 − λ) < x2 > −2α3 < x4 > = 0
dλ
So
T 2π
1 a2 a2
<x > =
2 a cos (ωt + β)dt =
2 2
cos2 ψd ψ =
T 2π 2
0 0
T 2π
1 a4 3a4
< x4 > = a4 cos4 (ωt + β)dt = cos4 ψd ψ =
T 2π 8
0 0
3
So λ = α1 + α3 a2 (2.25.1)
4
In Exercise 2.5(a), the Eq. (2.5.1) is the same as the nonlinear equation in this
Exercise, where the the method of multiple scales has been used to find√the frequency-
√
amplitude relationship as in the Eq. (2.5.23). In the equation, let ω = λ, ω1 = α1 ,
α = α3 , we can obtain (2.25.1), i.e., the results are the same as those obtained by the
the method of multiple scales.
(b) The residual is
R = α1 x + α2 x2 + α3 x3 − λx
T
1
R =2
[(α1 − λ)x + α2 x2 + α3 x3 )2 dt
T
0
= (α1 − λ)2 x2 + 2α2 (α1 − λ) x3 + 2α3 (α1 − λ) x4
+ α2 α3 x5 + α22 x4 + α32 x6
d < R2 >
= −2(α1 − λ) < x2 > −2α2 < x3 > −2α3 < x4 > = 0
dλ
So
T 2π
1 a2 a2
<x > =
2 a cos (ωt + β)dt =
2 2
cos2 ψd ψ =
T 2π 2
0 0
2.26 Exercise 2.26 (Comparison of the Galerkin Method with the the Method … 75
T 2π
1 a4 3a4
<x > =
4 a cos (ωt + β)dt =
4 4
cos4 ψd ψ =
T 2π 8
0 0
T
1
< x3 > = a3 cos3 (ωt + β)dt = 0
T
0
3
So λ = α1 + α3 a2 (2.25.2)
4
Let u = εv, we obtain
3 5
ω2 = α1 + α3 a2 − α1−1 α22 a2 (2.25.4)
4 6
It can be seen that the result obtained by the equivalent linearization method
(2.25.2) is different from that obtained by the the method of multiple scales (2.25.4).
The reason is that in the equivalent linearization method, the quadratic nonlinear term
has no effect on the mean square error and therefore does not affect the linearization
parameter λ; whereas in the the method of multiple scales, the quadratic nonlinear
term appears in the equation to eliminate secular terms and thus corrects for the
relationship between the frequency and amplitude in nonlinear oscillation.
T
< Racos(ωt + β) > = 1
T
Racos(ωt + β)dt
0
= 21 a(−aω2 + α1 a + 43 α3 a ) = 0
3
3
So ω2 = α1 + α3 a2 (2.26.1)
4
we obtain
T
< R[acos(ωt + β) + B] > = 1
T
R[acos(ωt + β) + B]dt
0
= 21 a[−aω2 + α1 a + 2α2 aB + 43 α3 a3 + 3α3 aB3 ] = 0
3
i.e. −aω2 + α1 a + 2α2 aB + α3 a3 + 3α3 aB3 = 0 (2.26.2)
4
< RB > = 0
we obtain
T
1
< RB > = RBdt
T
0
2.27 Exercise 2.27 (Equations Containing Second, Third and Fourth Order … 77
1 3
= B α1 B + α2 a2 + B2 + α3 B3 + a2 B =0
2 2
1 3
i.e. α1 B + α2 ( a2 + B2 ) + α3 (B3 + a2 B) = 0 (2.26.3)
2 2
From the Eqs. (2.26.2) and (2.26.3), we obtain
1
B = − α2 α1−1 a2 + · · ·
2
3 5
and ω2 = α1 + α3 a2 − α22 α1−1 a2 (2.26.4)
4 6
(e) Compare these results with (2.25.4), we can find that the success of the application
of Galerkin procedure depends on the hypothetical solution. In order to obtain the
effect of all nonlineat terms on the frequency-amplitude relationship of a nonlinear
oscillation, we should choose the hypothetical solution to include all nonlinear
coefficients appearing in the odd harmonic terms of the residual R.
Solution: (a) At the singularity point of the system, there is ü = u̇ = 0, which gives
−u + u4 = 0
1 1
V (u) = − u2 + u5
2 5
Since .V (u = 1) = [−1 + 4u3 ]u=1 = 3 > 0
the singularity u = 1 is the center.
Let x = u − 1, which gives
ẍ − (x + 1) + (x + 1)4 = 0
Let
78 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
x = εv (2.27.2)
(b) We seek an expansion of the following form for the above equation around the
singularity v = 0
0 = v̈ + ω02 v + εα2 v2 + ε2 α3 v3 + ε3 α4 v4
= [D02 + 2εD0 D1 + ε2 (D12 + 2D0 D2 ) + · · · ](v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 + · · · )
+ω02 (v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 + · · · ) + εα2 (v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 + · · · )2
+ε2 α3 (v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 + · · · )3 + ε3 α4 (v0 + εv1 + ε2 v2 + · · · )4
= D02 v0 + ω02 v0 + ε(D02 v1 + 2D0 D1 v0 + ω02 v1 + α2 v02 )
+ε2 [D02 v2 + 2D0 D1 v1 + (D12 + 2D0 D2 )v0 + ω02 v2 + 2α2 v0 v1 + α3 v03 ] + · · ·
(2.27.6)
2α2 AA α2 A2 2iω0 T0
v1 = − + e + cc (2.27.12)
ω02 3ω02
Substitute (2.27.10) and (2.27.12) into (2.27.9), and take A = A(T2 ) into account,
we obtain
where cc denotes the complex conjugate term of its preceding terms and NST denotes
terms which do not generate secular terms. In order to eliminate the secular term, we
need
10α22
2iω0 D2 A − ( − 3α3 )A2 A = 0 (2.27.14)
3ω02
1 iβ
Let A= ae (2.27.15)
2
Substitute (2.27.15) into (2.27.14), we obtain
1 10α22
iω0 D2 a − ω0 aD2 β − ( − 3α3 )a3 = 0 (2.27.16)
8 3ω02
Separate the real and imaginary parts of the above equation yields
1 10α22
D2 a = 0, D2 β + ( − 3α3 )a2 = 0 (2.27.17)
8ω0 3ω02
1 10α22
β=− ( − 3α3 )a2 T2 + β0 (2.27.18)
8ω0 3ω02
Combining the above results, the first-order approximate solution of the Exercise
can be written as
1 10α22
u = εacos[ω0 t − ( − 3α3 )a2 ε2 t + β0 ] + · · · (2.27.19)
8ω0 3ω02
Let ε = 1 yields
80 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
1 10α22
u = acos[ω0 t − ( − 3α3 )a2 t + β0 ] + · · · (2.27.20)
8ω0 3ω02
Therefore, the relationship between the frequency and the amplitude of the
oscillation is
1 10α22
ω = ω0 − ( − 3α3 )a2 (2.27.21)
8ω0 3ω02
3 5 2 2
or ω2 = ω02 + α3 a2 − α a (2.27.22)
4 6ω02 2
ω2 = 3 − 7a2 (2.27.23)
Solution: Cases (a) and (b) are special cases of (c), therefore, we solve for case (c).
As seen from the Fig. 2.9a–c, F(u) is an odd function of u, so this Exercise can be
solved by harmonic balance method, equivalent linearization method and Galerkin
method. Here, we use the Galerkin method.
Let
u = acos(ωt + β)
T
1
0 = Racos(ωt + β) = Racos(ωt + β)dt
T
0
T
ω2 a2 1
=− + acos(ωt + β)F[acos(ωt + β)]dt
2 T
0
2π
ω2 a2 1
=− + acosψF[acosψ]d ψ
2 2π
0
2.28 Exercise 2.28 (Solving Nonlinear Equations with Segmentation Functions) 81
(a) (b)
(c)
Fig. 2.9 F(u) for three different cases (a)–(c) in Exercise 2.28
π/2
ω2 a2 2
=− + acosψF[acosψ]d ψ
2 π
0
√
Since d ψ = −du/(asinψ) = −du/ a2 − u2 , the above equation can be changed
to
The two integrals on the right-hand side of Eq. (2.28.1) are calculated as follows:
82 2 Conservative Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
ac
= k1 (−u a2 − u2 a0c + a2 − u2 du)
0
u 2 a2 u
= k1 (−u a2 − u2 a − u2 a0c + sin−1
ac
0 + ac
0 )
2 2 a
u 2 a2 u
= k1 (− a − u2 a0c + sin−1 a0c )
2 2 a
k1 ac 2 k a 2
a
sin−1
1 c
=− a − ac2 +
2 2 a
a a a
uF(u)du uF(u) [k1 ac + k2 (u − ac )]u
√ = √ du = √ du
a 2 − u2 a 2 − u2 a 2 − u2
ac ac ac
a a
(k1 ac − k2 ac )u k2 u2
= √ du + √ du
a 2 − u2 a 2 − u2
ac ac
k2 u 2 k2 a2 −1 u
= −(k1 ac − k2 ac ) a2 − u2 a
ac − a − u2 a
ac + sin a
ac
2 2 a
k2 ac 2 π k2 a2 k2 a2 −1 ac
= (k1 ac − k2 ac ) a2 − ac2 + a − ac2 + − sin
2 4 2 a
Substituting these two results into (2.28.1), we obtain
ω2 a2 2 k1 ac 2 k1 a2 −1 ac
− + [− a − ac2 + sin
2 π 2 2 a
k a
2 c
+ (k1 ac − k2 ac ) a2 − ac2 + a2 − ac2
2
π k2 a2 k2 a2 −1 ac
+ − sin ]=0 (2.28.2)
4 2 a
2 ac ac ac2
So ω = k2 − (k2 − k1 )[sin−1 +
2
1− ] (2.28.3)
π a a a2
u = acos(ωt + β)
cosn ψ = b1 cosψ + · · ·
where
2π
π/2
b1 = 1
π
cosψcos n
ψd ψ = 4
π
cosn+1 ψd ψ
√ 0 0
4 π [ 2 (n+2)] [ 1 (n+2)]
1
= π 2 [ 21 (n+3)]
= √2π [ 21 (n+3)]
2
The second equal sign of the above equation holds because n is an odd integer.
Substituting this to (2.29.1), we obtain
2 [ 21 (n + 2)]
−ω2 cosψ + kan−1 √ cosψ + · · · = 0
π [ 21 (n + 3)]
So
2k [ 1 (n + 2)]
ω2 = √ an−1 21 (2.29.2)
π [ 2 (n + 3)]