0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes) 19 views 10 pages Rosenberg - basicRD
Private firms engage in basic research primarily to generate long-term economic benefits, despite the challenges of appropriating the knowledge produced. The document discusses how market incentives are often insufficient to encourage investment in basic research due to high risks and uncertainties, leading to a concentration of such research in a few large firms. Additionally, firms that successfully conduct basic research often have strong market positions, allowing them to capitalize on the benefits of their investments over time.
AI-enhanced title and description
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Go to previous items Go to next items
Save 2. Rosenberg_basicRD For Later
Why do firms do basic research
(with their own money
‘Nathan ROSENBERG
hes
apace, Sued aay, Sd C4 O00, USA
“The question to be addressed i: Why do private
Sins perform baie tsearch with thee we o>
ney? Interet nth question derives from both
{naiycal and wtltaran considerations. There is
mii! evidence ithe United Stites, which
‘Provides the main eomext fr this paper, support
Jeg the view that base research makes a sigii-
cant contribution to the productivity growth of
the economy [47-1 8 widely beld thar social
returns from basic eacarch ate significant and
bigher than private ets adie fr this reason
nba most such actvids continue 1 be financed
by the taxpayer This alo plies that measures
simed at increasing sie research by the pevate
Sector will be wellare improving I the United
States, the federal gorerament inthe years since
‘he Stcond World War ft provided the vart,
Inajrty of all funds devoted to basic research
[Although the feral sare ha been deslining in
recent years and alvough that share is at its
lowest ievel in about 20 years, it sil constitutes
shout two-thirds of the total [10
the goa sto ensourage the private sector to
spend maze money or basi esearch, its neces
sary to sat out By asking why they would want
{oso inthe frst place: Suppese itis taken as
niomati tha private ndusty im basines solely
to make money. and therefore that fem are ot
[Sins More Mare Clue, Dood Nien, Ea
Teas ig Pa
prepared to spend money for merely sentimental
‘or humanitarian purposes, Let us assume that they
‘will sped their own money on basic research only
‘when they are reasonably confident that wil
Yield rate of return on thi investnent in the
{generation of knowiedge that is atleast compare
‘Ble wo therate of return that they would expeet on
some other form of investment in more tangibe
capital
Tis important to think of baie research hy
private industry ae a form of investment, and
fore wil be sai aboot Uus later But it may be
‘seal to anticipate some of that later discussion
here by pointing oat that basic research, from 8
‘rvate fms pint of wew, i not only aves
‘ent. Is more precisely. aod really By deini-
tho, a Tonglerm fnvestment. There piety.
ro resonable expectation that these expenditures
‘vl begin wo genevate a eash ow inthe next few
yess or so
‘Why, then should private industry be wing to
make sich expenditures? The question fe cual
(ne for the academe economist a4 well a¢ for
Policymakers in both the public and private see-
{ors Since the seminal papes by Avtow and Nel-
son 2.11] thar been scapes by moa economists
tha private enterprise economy fis wo provide
sdaquate incentives for investment in knowledge
production. ‘There are several reasoas for this
serton. Firat, theres inerently a high degre of
Saintrable risk and uncersity tha noes 4
‘we move along the base research end of te
esearch spectrum. Secondly ~ and this specie
to knowledge asa commodity itis beeved that
aowledge one produce isn some meaning
sense “onthe shel”, Asa Smsequencs, noclat
al/melnstream economics eld that once pro-
sled Knowledge was freny avaiable to ali
4723/0 /550 © Wa Eee Sc Pubs BY. ang)eluding tote fms that may hate made no conti-
bution whatever to the prducion of the know
ge” A clase “tee sider” siuation, la eorain
fase, one could counteract ths by creating
propery rights in knowledge: bu at all kinds of
Enowiedge are patentable in rich a way as (0
preclude a competitor from expoting that knowl
bilge, For these resons i hasbeen held th
Sint seous problem of apprypiaili
Tins Rinaeeing. the resereh save no adequate
ig the be
‘he result of insffcent or impstect competion
[sithough i ist fer charge apaiast the main
(tadion of snodemn mirosconamies that I tends
to attsbute almost any problem in resource isle
Teeation to inefficient competion. hiss no: ene
Of thove caves. It has boo posted out thatthe
markt for knowledge is inereally imperfect and
thin becuse in order to detrnne the value of
information, it would be necessary. a general, 19
enon the information. This o° course creates &
feodamentaldifclty because, once the buyer
Koows the information, ste tas Bo incentive to
ay fori
"ae has pone out that society would ins
‘st insfiiem resources in research even under
pevetly competitive conditions (2) He als argued
{hat « monopolst'spreanvention monopoly Prof
its weaken th insentve to invent as compared
fo the compaitive situation (2. p. 198-173
Indeed, in one sens contpetion even exacerbates
the problem, The lkethood that compeitors wil
{Guickly exploit the ureful new tnowledge weakens
‘hen further the incentives on the pat of compet
te firme to vest in Howe production in the
fis place The only way 10 seagihen thse
inceativs iby offering the fim that conduct the
‘esearch s proprietary contol over the valuable
Findings thatthe research generates But such cone
{tol ecg in the frm of past Fights ~ puts os
nthe other horn of te effiseney lenm. This
FS besaue, once knowledge hasbeen produce. it
is covey avilable fr odher fms to ule as
tell Any restriction of sul uses socially subop:
ima) beesse it would depie some firms. of
‘pportenites to aise their producti by making
tke of knowledge that is already produced and
therefore avaiable to society at no incremental
ost To deprive Gems af rly costes opportan=
tiesto improve thee efficiency is obviouysubop-
‘al
“This is the major conclusion of economic the
ony: Market inentives ae insufficiently strong 10
fsenerate the sovally optimal amount of invest
‘ent in research — because of nonappropritbile
fier and uncertainties. However, attempts 10 al>
levate that problem ~ by allowing firms tap
propriate the findings of research ~ create a3,
‘huey serous problem Because they impose ce:
‘ction upon the use of valuable knowlege that
Ih aleady toc produced
“Tipe economist’ onelosion that nermal market
forces do not provide suong incentives forthe
performance of research, expecially basic research,
Jeauite consistent with obserations of the real
‘word. The obvious empirical acti that the over=
‘wheling majority of private fems do ot finance
the performance of any basic research. Basic te-
scare fat highly concentrated in two sens
{the gest bok of al sch esate is petormed
ina very small numberof industrial sectors, and
(Gy within these sectors there isa handel of firms,
‘ypialy large firms, that dominate che basic r=
search picture
‘Only lnted data are availabe with respect to
‘company spending on basic rereatch, With respect
to sectoral concenation, incomplete dati pub-
lished bythe Nationa Sience Foundation (10. p
53} indicate tht, in 1984, 61 persantof company
financed base research was in four sectors
Chemicals ‘$67 milion
Electra! equipment 450
Aircraft & Missin 288
Machinery 209
subtotal $1584 /52578~ 61 8!
2
“The question persists: Why do the Firms that do
Dosierscerh doi? Alternatively, why do some
the ta eae fr af emp nded RAD
Sota SOT A058‘ns find it profitable (or expectedly profiable)
Economists, 25 we have seen, have stressed the
problems asocated wth appropriability as the
Iain deerteat to base reteareh ~ the dificliy.
Under normal market conditions, of appropriating
the enelite generated by the reearch findings
But it shoold be sotced, fist ofall thar tus
requires an important qualification Even if firm's
bse reearch generted many benefits that it
‘ould nor appropriate the mere existence of such
‘onapproprablie is never an adequate explana~
to forthe reluctance to pecform base research,
So long asthe perforing firm can eapiae some
ofthe Benefits, that might be sufficient for ito 20
Some research, Tes nt necessary to expire al of
the benefits ~ indeed it would be wndesable fit
id. Research soil deseable precisely be-
fase often generates soch widespread andi
‘scriminate benefits All shat is necessary is th
‘markt fores allow te frm to capture enough Of
{here benefits to yield a igh at of rtm on its
‘own investment in baie rerereh
“Thus, the exsence of spillovers and nonap-
propriate that low competitors a tree de is
ot 2 decisive case against the performance of
R&D (or specially bac tesearchy by private
fms IF he production of ew knowledge sen
‘mtes commercial oprortunites to the performer.
the relevant caelationsavalves, aot the size of
the spillover bot whether the performing. fm
in capt enough cf the benefits genecated 10
‘eld a high rate of rou on is investment Even
Inthe exreme case of base research, where there
‘i no prospect of establishing proprictary contre,
‘over the research Tidings commercial benefits
ray neverthciews be wey gre
“These potential beseits largely tke the Form
of what er called “int mover advantage" Tas
{s 4 big subject that wil not be addressed ere
beyond indicating the eateries into which such
advantages may fall. They include a vanety of
Tearing expences Firms that move dow Such
learning curves fit - whether these curves pet
tain 10 ‘cost reductions or performance improve-
sents may be able subsequently to exploit the
‘ivantagas conferred asa barier tothe entty of
tow firms, irtmoves may be able to acquire
Saluable assets - ef. of «geographic location oF 3
rinral deposit whose commercial worth will be
‘vorsbly alfcied by new research findings. To
‘he extent thatthe fading of base research can
De eranlatedinta patentable asoetsfethr dos
cam, fisiimovers may be able 10 consolidate
{heir market portion through patent protection.
Furthermore, buyer switching cove may be sige
ifcant and may comutue significant form of
protection agaist competes for fis that are
First to enter the new produ line
‘Althoush frsemover advantages may thus be
sutstatal, there may also be subsantil fst
mover disadvantages as well as latomover ade
wantager If there are spnieant spillovers of
[Knowledge between firms then a ltepover could
‘ain the same knowledge at a lower cost while at
the same time, avoiding the major mistakes that
the Gstimover made en route Neverthe, for
present purposes 1 wish merely to aber that
Fratmover advantages may fequently survive the
‘otfeting disadvantages and Seve asa sigafiant
incentive for the peformance of basic research
6
One fly obviows, but nonetbelssinpertant
statement about base secarch in privat industry
ie that mont fem that have engaged int have Bad
faidy. strong and. wellentenched postions of
‘market power. Precisely because the potential paj-
ff to basi research & 50 long tem. only tras
that were reasonably confident of being around in
the lang term would be likly to consider the
possibilty of king such commitments. Ths
the most succesful basic research labs have been
in Tems with stong musket postions: Bell Labs
(Gspecialybetore divestiture IBM, DuPont, Dos
Chemical. Eastman Kodak, etc. GM is reputed 19
have done quite bit af baie research Some ears
‘ag, bot the commitment to base research i aid
to have devined along withthe deine in GM's
‘market sire inthe automobile industry (GM has
had the largest total RED budget of any povate
American fom $3.5 billion i T986. What peo
postion of that amount is basic research is aot,
public information, But itis probably very smal
Another obvious reason why small firms bard
‘vee basie research is tha i research dings
fre dificolt co patent and hence she Now of
payols cannot be capitalise, then these pavofts
bust be appropsated Ma the means mentionedcaer — escatilly through incorporating the
Enowiedge in the form of improved goods of
proceses, This means of couse, that a larger
farket share wil offer the prospect of a higher
pavot
"A separate but related points that itis nt size
sone or market power that ater. Large Fens
may be more wiling to undevake basic research
then they bave a clvese range of products and
rong marketing ae dlsribtion networks chat
igereme ther confidence that they wil eventually
De able to put the findings of base research 10
Some good commercial se In view of the high
Segre of uncerainty tat surounds the outcome
patents have, in general. provided more effective
Protection to proprietary knowledge inthe phar-
Imaceaticl industry than in ms Ube? indus.
Ta dhs respect the innovative “output” of sm
Biotechnology Firms is likely to be more realy
sppropriable than ie the case for stall em i
other iadustnes
The venture capital industry sems toe tet
Ing biotechnology a4 a kind of lotery. The vast
"jority of firme wil almost certaily Be losers
Svhen the eventual "shake-out™ takes place. but
‘Mane suse innoeaions say eld very Big
‘eumn ~ a5 Genentech bopes wil be the case wih
thsve plasminogen activator (TPA) for heart
Df hasc research its probably very important to attach vitims
{firm #0 have the confidence that i will know
how 1 exploit new knowledge at may turn up in
tinexpested places and that wl have the come
Plementary ses tha will enable ito do so. For
fh iluminaing treatment of related issues see
‘ese
“The considerable number of small botechnal>
cay finns appears to contact the view that
Investment in Basic reach regutes a tong
‘marker positon. Iti certainly true that, i the
dtug industry proper, the mest active research
Dros seen! to be concentrated in the large
firms = Merc, Sohason and Johnsen. Lilly, Pie,
Upon et, But nthe biotechnology field good
all base research coreaty beg petormed
by sal companies such a2 Gevente. The relly
furious aspect of these small companies that
‘many ofthe have no markeable products at all
Sd haraly any have more thar jst fe
‘What seems to be happening here i tha the
somal botesoology frm are engaged. basic
Fevearch that bebeved to be closet the ome
tmeralation stage. AL the same time, i a
‘hiv speculative pame tha is bing financed by
‘venture eaptline. as well a see large ems upd
‘wealthy individuals who are red by the pes
Tivo avery high pao
‘What appears to be driving he sal firms that
perform basic research in biotechnology is the
Frstmover advan
that fst mover advantages maybe etal. Mock
‘tthe investment in ths basic esearch took place
before the resent changes ia ne patent lw tha
steed patent protection to Bve organisms. But
“is extension ofthe law mast cers steeagien
the incentives to do bese reves, Furthermore
In understanding why some private firms do
Isic reeareh iti ocessary 10 recognize th
businewes do not live in ueat. orderly world
sere causal relationships are always clealy de-
fined and swhere causality always works in One
Section only. The business environment is much
‘more Interactive, fll of "Feedbacks" where some
“downstream” development reacts back ypon and
ere behavior “"upateam’- Perhaps woos im
portant, it is fll of unplanned, or seudentl
Sevelopments that then tm out 10 have an tm
poruant set of consequences oftheir own,
Tis essential to emphasize the unexpected and
the unplanned, even if — of especally if =
renders serious quantification impossible Fact
the dificalie in precisely idenying and reas
ing the benefits of hase rewarch are hard 10
‘raggeate. White this might seem to be just an
Interesting academic point about the lis of
Certain methodologies it hab imporant de-
‘Getonmaking consequences. The post hat been
fexpresed suscinctye "Project selection methodol
‘opis of formal, quantiatve aatare reduce the
tendency to perozr basic research” [8
‘art, but only» par. of the problem i that he
‘vipat of asi researc is never some final prod
srt which the market place ean atich a Price
tap. Rather. the output is some form of new
owledge that har no lear dimensionality. The
‘ovipul ia pocular kind of intermediate god that
say be used, 04 to produce a final good but
{perbaps) to play some farther role i fe invenion of # new final giod. Those connections are,
howsurreutrneinariyeificlt tnce wih ay
fonfidenc, even expat But even if these eiffiut-
‘es coll be overome, he problems of evaluating
the Knowledge. and ef providing an appropiate
incentive syrem to veward the knowledge pro
ders, would appear to be insuperable,
“Thus, it is doubt that busines decision
makers often st down and askin an abstract
sways Should we do basic eeseaich? How much
basic reearch shovld we 40? Obvious. private
firs fot no obligation to advance the frombers of
basi cence at sch, remamably, they ae alway
asking themselves how they can make the mest
profitable rate of eeturn on thei investment.
Ta this context. my own emphasis on the unes-
pected and the unplanned is deliberate, because
{he history of base research in Americas industry
suggests that every lage part of this researc has
been usitentional, Tosti to ay, base research
findings of major signieance have emerged a the
Unplanned byproduct of the atempt to slve some
‘ery sperifie mdasril problem. The fet is that
the dtnctionbetwoen basic research and appli
research is highly artical and arbitrary, The ds
Uinedon is usualy made to turn upon the motives,
for goals, of the persca performing the research
thoupht he was doing back around 1870, e would
have replied that he was ying to solve some very
pracetl problems ceansced with fermentation
End puttefaction in te French wine industy. He
felved the practical prcbloms ~ but along the
‘way he invented the meder science of bacteril-
‘gy. Simul if tha other great Frenchman, Sack
rao had been aed. some ity yen earn,
what he thought he was doina, ie answer would
fave been that he was tying to improve the
cfcency of seam engines." As a byproduct of
that pariclar practi interest he created the
‘modem sence Of themmodynamics,
ROK Reo ure tne mare ef 1 27
‘che mes aks eee
Buti isnot necesary to go back 1 nineteenth
century France Tho two spectacular sientie
‘breakthroughs are cited simply because they were
so spectacular. We could, stead, lok at Bell
abe in the twentieth century. ack a the end of
the 19205, when vansatanie. radiotelephone
service wat first exabihed, the service was poor
‘besaute there was lots of ttc. Bll Labe asked a
young, man, Karl Jansky, 10 determine the source
[Of the noise £0 that it coud be reduced oF
iminated. He was given ¢ rotatable antenna
‘work with: Jansky published a paper in 1932 in
‘which he feported thre sourtes of noise: Local
Thunderstorms, more dstast thunderstorms nd 3
{Girdsource, which identified as "a steady ies
stale, the oxgin of whichis ot known". It was
this star noite”. as he labelled it which marke
the birth of radio astronomy 12)
Sanskys experience (as well asthe eater ex
perience of Carnot and Paster) underlines cae
Of the reasons why the atlempt to distinguish
‘beeen banc research and applied research it
cexremely dificult to cary out in practice. Funda
‘mental breaktvoughs often cceur wile dealing
sith very applied or pret problems. Attempt:
dng to draw that neon the bats of te mouives of
the parton performing the resarch — whether
theresa concern with acquiring useful knowledge
(applied) as opposed to a purely disinterested
search for new knowledge (basic) ~ is in my
‘opinion, 2 hopeless quest: Whatever the ex ante
Intention in undertaking reearch, the hind. of
Knowledge actually acquired i highly wapredic-
able. Historizally, some ofthe most fundamental
Seintie breakthroughs have come from people
Ike Carnot, Paster and Jansky, who hough they
were doing very applied research, and who would
Undoubtedly have sad 40 they had been asked
atthe time.
[But the distinction breaks down in ancther way
as well We have to ditngush between the mo-
tives ofthe individual cenit and the matives of
the fim that employs them. Many scent in
Deva industry could honesty say that they are
Etiempting to advance te trots of ase ses
‘ie Knowledge, without any interest in possible
pplication At the same time the motivation of
the research managers who decide fo finance Te
earch in seme base fell of cince, may be
‘Mrongly motivated by expectations of eventually
‘etal tindngs Ths, Bell Lape decied toport base research in astrophysics Because of its
lationship to the whole fle of problems and
possiblities in micowave trantmason, and espe
lly the use of eommanication stelites for soch
purposes It tered out tht tery hgh fequen
en ain and other atmosphere conditions be
‘ame major soarees of intrleace in transmis:
Sion. This sour of signal lst was a continuing
oncom inthe development of stelite eomman=
‘htons I was out of such patel concerns that
Bell Labs desided 10 employ Amo Penzas and
Rober Win, Pencar and Wien would ae
‘oubtely have been ignant if anyone had su
fested that they were doing ayihing cher than
hse reeurch, They fir observed the cosmic
Ickground radiation, which sow taken a cone
Firmation ofthe "big bang” theory of the forma
thom ofthe uivese, while they were attempting ©
Idenaty and measure the vargas sours of alse
inher anteana and inthe atmosphere. Although
Ponzias and Wikon didnot now atthe Sie
the character of the background radiation that
they discovered war jest what ha been postlaed
fart by couologits favoring the "big bang™
theory, Pena and Wilson appropeately shared &
Nobel Prize for this fining. The finding was
Shout as bate as bate sience can get, and isin
‘no wey diminished by observing thatthe fez that
ployed them did s0 because they hoped to
improve the quality of satelite tansmision (12)
‘The pales between the fundamental ds:
coves of Jans and Pensis and Wilson i ery
have deliberately examine thse instances of
bse resentch emerging out 9 praca and op
plied concerns because they provide valuable
nr fnto the question of how busi essarch pets
{ be card aut in private indus. Te is often
‘Grd out unintentionally. Its, moreover dif
Fie to understand if one insists on drawing
‘sharp distinctions between base and applied re
Sarch om the bess of the motivations of those
fevocing te esearch, ff, T would go much
ferters When bavi research fp industry is io
Inte from the ext of the firm. whether organiza
tionally or geographical, it key to bevome
rie and unproductive, The story of base re
search in industry suggests that iis hel to be
Inoststective when Hi highly interac with
the work. or the concerns. of applied sien
td engineer. This i baause the high technology
industries are continually throwing up problems,
Gifiulies and anomalous observations that te
‘most unlikely o aseur outside of high technol
‘gy content. High techacogy industries provide &
Sight vantage point for the conduct of basic
‘een, but in order for ssendsts to expt she
potential of the industrial environment ts neces
intracion with other components of the ine
Austad word. Bel Labs Before divestiture s
probably the best example of place where the
Frsituional environment was most hospitable for
‘asi esearch
“The emphasis on interactions and feedbacks
sogpists 4 way of thinking about basic research
that T boot. is potentially fruitful. That i, the
performance of basic esearch may be thought of
sa ticket of admission to an ifoeration net-
trork Ths network includes a variety of ions
tion flows with no. parcular attempt 10 di
tinguish or eluify nto asic or applied cate
tones, Thote iss high degre of interact, even
fmbracing work that goes oo within the reat of
Development as well at Research
tis worth obuerving thatthe attempt cas:
sity coeur into asie and applied categories i
paricly hard to take seriously in some areas
nd disciplines. eg. in the realms of heal
‘medicine and aprcuire. A strict application of
the tat common criterion for basi research —
research that undertaken withost» concern for
rata applications = eocld easily lead 10 the
onclsion thatthe National Institutes of Health
[re not deeply involved im base research, or tha
current university and industrial research in the
Feil of biotechnology contin ao basic rsarch
‘which i beard
To conducting ie resource surveys the NSF
defines basic rveach ay esearch tha has 35
Ghjecve "a fuller knowledge or understanding of
(he subject understudy. eater than a practical
pplication thereof” By contrast. applied research
iS research drested toward pining “knowledge oF
findestanding necessary for determining he
meane by which a recognized and specif need
nay be met 9}. These definitions appeat to mean
{hats ifthe Nationa Institutes of Heals dzeted 3ranjr research thrust into cellar biology to pro-
‘de the enonladgs necesay forthe development
‘ofa vaccine again AIDS, ora cre for 8 pectic
form of cance, that none of the resulting esearch
could be classed at asi, Ht dificult to se
Snhy the doerminaticn to eal witha paricalar
dscase cannot give the to rsecch that provides
fuller knowledge ct understanding of the sub-
jet understudy" even hen there i praca!
pplication” in mind. Here again the inteodwcton
‘of motives, or goal, ees than useful athe NSF
Js ford to acknowledge with respect specfcally
‘to research in private dustry Thus the NSF ads
{o is definition of Easie research the following
‘qualification
"To sake into account industrial goals, NSF
‘modifies this definition for the indy sector
Wo indicate that Be research advances sein
tie knowledge not having specific commercial
objectives. although such investigations may be
In fields of present or potenti interest to the
‘eponing company” (9,
‘A furher point that needs tobe eaphasized is
that there afe a munber of actives that ae
essential tothe suces of business firms in high
technology industes that depend heavily vpon 8
bse research capability, even i that cup
oes not play a direc fle in solving industrial
problems. For one thag, fies often need to do
Basic research in oeda to understand better how
and where to conduct resaren of a more applied
[Link] that rust be # major reauon for
‘he performance of basic teseaech in private in
dusty. Many firs need to have a basi research
‘apablity Decne that capability i eseatial 10
making efecve dcisons about their applied re
Search settles, For another thing. a basic re
Search capability is essential for evaluating the
‘outcome of much applied reverch and for perce:
Ing it pose implestions,
Tn providing a depe level of understanding of
natural phenomens, asi research can provide
‘alunble guidance 1 the deco which there
is. high probably of payoifs to more applied
research, [a this sent, William Shoekle's educe
thon in old state physes during the 1980+ may
Ihave been exteal to be dexslon at Bell Labs 10
"ook for subatitute for the vacuum tube in the
realm of sesicoaductr materials ~a search that
Tea avecoy to the invention of the ttnsisor. fp
this eapct a basic research capability is extential
product line of the fim an the kinds of process
technologies that ought to be adopted. I ean aso
be thought of, therefore as providing some defen:
sive eapbily ~ ofeing protection agaist the
possibilty of = mex, competitive prod intro:
‘ced fom an unexpected direction
Tm an even more geneal sense, asi research
capably i offen indispensable in order to moai=
{or and 10 evaluate Teseach being conducted
‘leewhere, Mont baie research in the Unite Sates
's conducted within the wiversty community. bt
in order to“ plugin” to there esearch center and
to exploit th knowledge that generated there, 8
fim must ave some in-house capability. A fim is
rmoch less likely to bene fom universiy te
Search unless it so performs sme basi rerarch,
"Ths point is Important aio in identifying &
serious limitation in the way economiss fison
bout scone knowledge and research in gene
fal As T suggested eater, such knowledge is
‘garded by economists at beng “on the hell”
nd costly avalale to all comers once it has
been produced. But this models seriously flawed
because it feguenily requires a evbetaial ce
search capably to understand, interpret and to
pprane knowledge that has Been placed upon
the shelf - whether baie at sppied. The cot of
maintaining this expabiity is high, beaute It is
"ely to require a enre of in howte sees who
fan do these things. And, in cede to maintain
{ach cadres the lm mus be willing to let them
perform basic research. The mont effective way #0
femain effectively plugged into the scenic net.
work to bea participant in the research process
"These assertions require some qulieston ard
shading Moch san be acoomplihed in monitoring
tnd evaluating many Mind of rvearch etnies
Conducted clewhere by inhouse persoanel who
fare strongly motivated and who place a high valve
‘upon such activities, The Japanese have tfestivsly
‘demonstrated these possibile in the las 390 years
for so. Neverteless, the sues of tht monitoring
apabiity wil often be determned by the sophie
Ueation of the in-hoase staff in eating the
signtcance of baie reearsh findings. Moteoves,
Japan's monitoring achievements Were cated out
Drimaaly with respect to technological rome
While fsa was stil in “eaten” mode, rather
than with respect to research that wa at oF nearthe sions rontirs. Foran iesghful eatmeat
of elated ives see Abramov (I
A final factor tha influences the wlingnes of
private firms to finance basi euch isthe role
EF the federal procurement proces, particularly
tniiary procurement. The eusence of this ence
fous market sbviouly iftoenes the REED dei
‘Sons of private firs that want to improve tir
“bit and ther eligi for goverment ale
tary procorement contracts An obvious way 10.40
tha b to signal ons capabilites by peforming
RED of the relevant sore This practice ie drelly
encouraged hy government sponsorship of design
Sd echnical competion in whic potential con-
tenetorsparipate, a lest parily at eis Fn
frpense. According t© ove se. of estimates in
{OBA about 30 pereen of RED expenditures by
private industry was stimulated by the prospect of
Securing. government. proeutement "conracts
(primarily éefence) [5] There are 2 number of
froblems wih thete eximates. Furthermore. for
Sur preset purpoves, they do not disagrepate
{otal R&D ito separate comporents such as sie
researc, Nevenhels. they suggest that Tage
Shae of private RAD may ot 3e directed toward
poral comnercial markets where they might
‘outnbue ie to productivity growth and in
proved compettivenes in domestic or intern
Tonal markets ater, hey mar be shaped by the
tems toe federal goverameat. Tp adtion. the
reporting of RED expenditure inevitably cone
tains certain amount of subjesive judgment, and
the numbers reported wil undoubtedly be in-
‘acne bythe dese to redex bites. The
harp increases ip reporied RAD expenditures
‘that have ovnsonall fllowe quickly pon the
Introduction of new tax incanives for R&D in
‘several counties may have bana more apparent
than real
“The growing role of defense R&D inthe federal
budget suggest that these concerns are of neess-
‘ne sigiieance, During the 198s there hasbeen 8
Inajorinereas in the relative importance of m=
tary R&D. In 1980 defense RAD consited 30
percent of all Tederal RAD expendicres
“Thereafter
petoent in 1986 (9. p. 226) Although its not
Enlil clas what the impact of this growth has
rose steadily 19 an (estimated) 72
fof use sesareh spending withia the feseal
Sedge. This is because defense R&D expend
‘res are very highly development-intensive com
‘ited to nondefense R&D expentures, Weapons
Stems involve immense developmen costs ahd
Skew the federal R&D budeet heavily in that
‘selon as the following date ivote (3
Dries eps
Benton Be 3
Thus, the growing role of military procurement
plus the ising share of defense in the federal
RED budget may be exercising major indiret
cifects pon the performance ofthe evi eson-
‘ny, It is obviously esoaial to examine mare
Carefully the effete of lage mullay purchases
Upon the composition of all R&D activities ine
‘lading those in what are regarded a the civilian
Stor It ie alko important fo erame the range of
seis within the huge defense R&D budget
For example, even though only 32 percent of
defense RAD is cased as basi, that is 32
peroet ofa extremely large suber. and i
Constitutes a sgaficant fraction of all basic re-
earch hats fnaneed bythe federal government.
iow can these base research actives be char-
setrzed? On what categorie of problems are
thay concentrated? What connections do they have
‘wih company-finded R&D? Where are. they
Complements and where are they sabsuttes? What
rete prospects thatthe outpt of miltary R&D
tray bene technologies of vale tothe iin 38
irall at to the military sector? Tt seems apparent
that these questions do not admit of categorical oF
general answers Thee ae reasons to beleve that
the valve of spillovers from the mlitry 10 the
ciuitian seater has changed substantially over the
pst 40 years or 30. These spillovers may very
Considerably. depending upon the specific come
Potion of research proects inthe defense R&D
portfolio. It is especially important 19 krow whataxe the prospects for he emergence of genuinely
wal sar” technologies from delanse R&D
spending
Tn the past there have beon specific eviian
technological systems that have relied sobtan-
tal benefits trom miliary REED. At onetime of
nother inthe past fony years, military and space
R&D have made major contnbutons to commer-
ial jet aieraft Gnsting airframes, jet engines
‘snd avons) to computers to semiconductors. t0
emmunication atellies, aad 10 nuclear power,
‘Although tis relatively eaey wo identity specific
technologies where mutary R&D has generat
important evan benefits, measuring the size of
‘eve benefits i far moe diffe. Even so, hare
fare szong resons to believe thatthe aatre of
‘hess silver is changing ove ie and ha, i
‘many ofthe industries mentioned the connection
between mibtary and commercial research pro
fas has grown move tenuous. Ar the reqe
‘ments of miliary RAD have become concerned
sith an increasingly arcane set of seeds of modern
‘weapons system, they have moved further apart
from he roquirements of evilian markets. fo some
rity technologies seems thatthe song em
Dass om product perlormance and improvement
nd he neglect of cost considerations. has erated
2 gap that has drastically reduced the possibltes
of significant splloves to the civilian economy.
For a further decusicn of spillovers, se (3)
Atthough this pape isnot primarily concerned
with questions of poley, it may nevertheless be
Spproprate to make a final observation of direct,
felevance to policy. Tat i that base research i
in very ral sens, 5 long-term investment and
needs to be thought aboot in such tenns. Basi
‘esearch represents a commitment of resoures to
Certain present ses tat may eventually have &
fGeancial payoll, but thee isan unusually High
degre of uncertainty stached to this possibly.
‘Wha is clea is that the payoff it comes. is zy
unlikely to come inthe ner term.
‘Although thinking about basic research in the
same way that an cccaomist thinks about long
{erm investment in tangible goods does not ex
aust what can usefuly be suid about basic Ye-
imteteeuat exercise. The point is that ve have
heen considering that portion of basic research
that it financed by private industry. where des
Sons are expected to be made in terms of cael
tions of present cose 4nd prospective benefits,
‘Thos, anything that strengthens the prosper for
contua!Tnancil retues is Ukely 19 stengthen
‘he wilingnesst0 perform basic research All the
sual forces that Would strenghen the willigness
to commit nancial resources to longterm pro-
jects become direc relevant to dessins com
(coming basi research Ia fact T would suggest
that the limas tein thinking about how 12
influence base research deiions theough gover-
rent pois ist ask: Doss this action improve
the prospect for deriving financil return (veo
tually) fom any useful products that may de
generated by the hase research? From this polat
Sf view, all goverment macroeconomic polices
fat improved’ the economic environment for
long-term basnes investment would alo ineease
‘he willingness of busines to spend more on base
research Basie research, [n eder1 be success
quires the making of stable. longterm commit
‘ents. Put negatively. itis Wkly tobe discouraged
by enti and unexpected changes in the busioss
environment. It i favored by the reduction of
‘inceraimes, by inereasng business confidence
land by the sense of sable foture prospect, includ
ing the confidence tha government polices them
selves wil not be subject to fequent change, Not
least important, iis favored by Tow interest cates
and reductions inthe cost of capital. Is iet=
enily Vue of al long-term investirens
Finally, a grester confidence in the strength of
one's downstream commerciabzation capabilites
Should increase the willingness to peform babe
ressarsh, by irengthening the prospect that the
fim will capture a larger share of the potential
downstream benefits that may be generated by
suc research
1 Mos Arann, Cane Up Fron Ate, sd
ating Behn, Yun of tora Ho hoe 8)
1 Kenta, Pomona Wore a Alcano
Resour iv The Rat ed Dereon of
1 Cepia Bain, ral Sepa AD1M 2 nites Prodan, RAD até Bae Rech
‘oe Pm tae ne Re arama
15) Pk cher, Poe ei RAD Spa
‘iin Prem Canc ers opt
1 eta Br non, Sat
(mn Siin Mast’ Bese Reser an run
fn ci Aor Eos Re Be
(0 Brat Non, ncn een Be md Apt
ins Roce ees Romp
1 ew ene Fm, Soe Ins ms
1 Nat Sen Faden, Nano Pts See
are Rac Wat
(01 Ret Neon he Sale coor ae ene
[euch Jaret ate enone ane 939,
(na Nae Renee. Jee the ik Bor (Cape
Urey Pe Cine 9 ch
tnx Naan eine Spe rm nary 2
D Spreng the US Ege ne Nata Wer
Sof Tat and Randy ito es) Sonne
Bi etn tne OE St dC
114 Bow Tene ratng fm Tahoe anonate,
ibe tity ah Po yn) 8-8