0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views7 pages

Pix4D Quality Report Analysis 4.5.6

The quality report for the project 'iglesia2' processed on June 9, 2025, indicates that all 60 images were calibrated successfully with an average ground sampling distance of 2.37 cm. The report details the calibration, georeferencing, and processing times, highlighting a mean reprojection error of 0.158 pixels and a total of 6,168,730 3D points generated. The report also includes information on the processing system, coordinate systems, and the results of DSM and orthomosaic generation.

Uploaded by

genesth
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Topics covered

  • Noise Filtering,
  • System Information,
  • Processing Options,
  • Dataset Calibration,
  • Image Sampling,
  • Initial Processing,
  • Geolocation Details,
  • Contour Lines,
  • Keypoints,
  • Data Visualization
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views7 pages

Pix4D Quality Report Analysis 4.5.6

The quality report for the project 'iglesia2' processed on June 9, 2025, indicates that all 60 images were calibrated successfully with an average ground sampling distance of 2.37 cm. The report details the calibration, georeferencing, and processing times, highlighting a mean reprojection error of 0.158 pixels and a total of 6,168,730 3D points generated. The report also includes information on the processing system, coordinate systems, and the results of DSM and orthomosaic generation.

Uploaded by

genesth
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Topics covered

  • Noise Filtering,
  • System Information,
  • Processing Options,
  • Dataset Calibration,
  • Image Sampling,
  • Initial Processing,
  • Geolocation Details,
  • Contour Lines,
  • Keypoints,
  • Data Visualization

Quality Report

Generated with Pix4Denterprise version 4.5.6

Important: Click on the different icons for:

Help to analyze the results in the Quality Report

Additional information about the sections

Click here for additional tips to analyze the Quality Report

Summary

Project iglesia2
Processed 2025-06-09 [Link]
Camera Model Name(s) FC6310_8.8_5472x3648 (RGB)
Average Ground Sampling Distance (GSD) 2.37 cm / 0.93 in
Time for Initial Processing (without report) 21m:38s

Quality Check

Images median of 48390 keypoints per image

Dataset 60 out of 60 images calibrated (100%), all images enabled

Camera Optimization 0.78% relative difference between initial and optimized internal camera parameters

Matching median of 21648.1 matches per calibrated image

Georeferencing yes, no 3D GCP

Calibration Details
Number of Calibrated Images 60 out of 60
Number of Geolocated Images 60 out of 60

Initial Image Positions

Figure 2: Top view of the initial image position. The green line follows the position of the images in time starting from the large blue dot.
Computed Image/GCPs/Manual Tie Points Positions

Uncertainty ellipses 10x magnified

Figure 3: Offset between initial (blue dots) and computed (green dots) image positions as well as the offset between the GCPs initial positions (blue crosses) and
their computed positions (green crosses) in the top-view (XY plane), front-view (XZ plane), and side-view (YZ plane). Dark green ellipses indicate the absolute
position uncertainty of the bundle block adjustment result.

Absolute camera position and orientation uncertainties

X [m] Y [m] Z [m] Omega [degree] Phi [degree] Kappa [degree]


Mean 0.108 0.107 0.177 0.095 0.069 0.103
Sigma 0.009 0.008 0.004 0.018 0.010 0.032

Bundle Block Adjustment Details


Number of 2D Keypoint Observations for Bundle Block Adjustment 1236275
Number of 3D Points for Bundle Block Adjustment 456533
Mean Reprojection Error [pixels] 0.158
Internal Camera Parameters

FC6310_8.8_5472x3648 (RGB). Sensor Dimensions: 12.833 [mm] x 8.556 [mm]

EXIF ID: FC6310S_8.8_5472x3648

Focal Principal Principal R1 R2 R3 T1 T2


Length Point x Point y
Initial Values 3668.759 [pixel] 2736.001 [pixel] 1823.999 [pixel] 0.003 -0.008 0.008 -0.000 0.000
8.604 [mm] 6.417 [mm] 4.278 [mm]
Optimized Values 3697.391 [pixel] 2705.939 [pixel] 1802.373 [pixel] -0.014 0.003 0.006 -0.003 -0.002
8.671 [mm] 6.346 [mm] 4.227 [mm]
Uncertainties (Sigma) 0.317 [pixel] 0.143 [pixel] 0.416 [pixel] 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.001 [mm] 0.000 [mm] 0.001 [mm]
Correlated

F
C0x

C0y
The correlation between camera internal parameters
R1 determined by the bundle adjustment. White indicates a full
correlation between the parameters, ie. any change in one can
be fully compensated by the other. Black indicates that the
R2 parameter is completely independent, and is not affected by
other parameters.

R3
Independent

T1

T2

The number of Automatic Tie Points (ATPs) per pixel, averaged over all images of the camera model,
is color coded between black and white. White indicates that, on average, more than 16 ATPs have
been extracted at the pixel location. Black indicates that, on average, 0 ATPs have been extracted at
the pixel location. Click on the image to the see the average direction and magnitude of the re-
projection error for each pixel. Note that the vectors are scaled for better visualization. The scale bar
indicates the magnitude of 1 pixel error.

2D Keypoints Table

Number of 2D Keypoints per Image Number of Matched 2D Keypoints per Image


Median 48390 21648
Min 39654 12980
Max 54117 26384
Mean 47731 20605

3D Points from 2D Keypoint Matches

Number of 3D Points Observed


In 2 Images 308258
In 3 Images 77918
In 4 Images 32258
In 5 Images 15466
In 6 Images 8470
In 7 Images 4971
In 8 Images 3034
In 9 Images 1953
In 10 Images 1277
In 11 Images 848
In 12 Images 582
In 13 Images 429
In 14 Images 307
In 15 Images 261
In 16 Images 145
In 17 Images 104
In 18 Images 61
In 19 Images 47
In 20 Images 42
In 21 Images 27
In 22 Images 27
In 23 Images 9
In 24 Images 12
In 25 Images 11
In 26 Images 3
In 27 Images 1
In 28 Images 6
In 29 Images 2
In 31 Images 4

2D Keypoint Matches
Uncertainty ellipses 5000x magnified
Number of matches
25 222 444 666 888 1111 1333 1555 1777 2000
Figure 5: Computed image positions with links between matched images. The darkness of the links indicates the number of matched 2D keypoints between the
images. Bright links indicate weak links and require manual tie points or more images. Dark green ellipses indicate the relative camera position uncertainty of the
bundle block adjustment result.

Relative camera position and orientation uncertainties

X [m] Y [m] Z [m] Omega [degree] Phi [degree] Kappa [degree]


Mean 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.006 0.003 0.005
Sigma 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.003

Geolocation Details

Absolute Geolocation Variance

Min Error [m] Max Error [m] Geolocation Error X [%] Geolocation Error Y [%] Geolocation Error Z [%]
- -15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-15.00 -12.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-12.00 -9.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-9.00 -6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-6.00 -3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-3.00 0.00 50.00 58.33 48.33
0.00 3.00 50.00 41.67 51.67
3.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.00 9.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
9.00 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
12.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
15.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mean [m] -0.000000 -0.000000 -0.000000
Sigma [m] 0.288493 0.184319 0.343953
RMS Error [m] 0.288493 0.184319 0.343953

Min Error and Max Error represent geolocation error intervals between -1.5 and 1.5 times the maximum accuracy of all the images. Columns X, Y, Z show the
percentage of images with geolocation errors within the predefined error intervals. The geolocation error is the difference between the initial and computed image
positions. Note that the image geolocation errors do not correspond to the accuracy of the observed 3D points.

Relative Geolocation Variance

Relative Geolocation Error Images X [%] Images Y [%] Images Z [%]


[-1.00, 1.00] 100.00 100.00 100.00
[-2.00, 2.00] 100.00 100.00 100.00
[-3.00, 3.00] 100.00 100.00 100.00
Mean of Geolocation Accuracy [m] 5.000000 5.000000 10.000000
Sigma of Geolocation Accuracy [m] 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000

Images X, Y, Z represent the percentage of images with a relative geolocation error in X, Y, Z.

Geolocation Orientational Variance RMS [degree]


Omega 1.100
Phi 1.056
Kappa 0.995

Geolocation RMS error of the orientation angles given by the difference between the initial and computed image orientation angles.

Initial Processing Details

System Information

CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7500T CPU @ 2.70GHz


Hardware RAM: 32GB
GPU: Intel(R) HD Graphics 630 (Driver: 31.0.101.2115)
Operating System Windows 10 Pro, 64-bit

Coordinate Systems

Image Coordinate System WGS 84 (EGM 96 Geoid)


Output Coordinate System WGS 84 / UTM zone 19S (EGM 96 Geoid)

Processing Options

Detected Template 3D Models


Keypoints Image Scale Full, Image Scale: 1
Advanced: Matching Image Pairs Free Flight or Terrestrial
Advanced: Matching Strategy Use Geometrically Verified Matching: no
Advanced: Keypoint Extraction Targeted Number of Keypoints: Automatic
Calibration Method: Standard
Advanced: Calibration Internal Parameters Optimization: All
External Parameters Optimization: All
Rematch: Auto, yes

Point Cloud Densification details

Processing Options

Image Scale 1/2 (Half image size, Default)


Point Density Optimal
Minimum Number of Matches 3
3D Textured Mesh Generation yes
3D Textured Mesh Settings: Resolution: Medium Resolution (default)
Color Balancing: yes
LOD Generated: no
Advanced: 3D Textured Mesh Settings Sample Density Divider: 1
Advanced: Image Groups group1
Advanced: Use Processing Area yes
Advanced: Use Annotations yes
Time for Point Cloud Densification 25m:23s
Time for Point Cloud Classification 01m:35s
Time for 3D Textured Mesh Generation 09m:07s

Results

Number of Generated Tiles 1


Number of 3D Densified Points 6168730
Average Density (per m3) 530.48
DSM, Orthomosaic and Index Details

Processing Options

DSM and Orthomosaic Resolution 1 x GSD (2.37 [cm/pixel])


DSM Filters Noise Filtering: yes
Surface Smoothing: yes, Type: Sharp
Generated: yes
Raster DSM Method: Inverse Distance Weighting
Merge Tiles: yes
Generated: yes
Orthomosaic Merge Tiles: yes
GeoTIFF Without Transparency: no
Google Maps Tiles and KML: no
Raster DTM Generated: yes
Merge Tiles: yes
DTM Resolution 5 x GSD (2.37 [cm/pixel])
Generated: yes
Contour Base [m]: 0
Contour Lines Generation Elevation Interval [m]: 1
Resolution [cm]: 100
Minimum Line Size [vertices]: 20
Time for DSM Generation 09m:30s
Time for Orthomosaic Generation 17m:12s
Time for DTM Generation 04m:14s
Time for Contour Lines Generation 01s
Time for Reflectance Map Generation 00s
Time for Index Map Generation 00s

You might also like