0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views2 pages

SD Exam

The document outlines various building environmental assessment methods, including BEAM Plus, BCA Green Mark, CASBEE, Pearl Rating System, BREEAM, and BERDE, each tailored to specific regional needs and sustainability goals. Key similarities among these systems include a focus on environmental sustainability, energy and water conservation, and indoor environmental quality, while also offering tiered certification levels to encourage higher performance. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, reflecting their unique contexts and objectives in promoting sustainable building practices.

Uploaded by

Helen Guzman
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views2 pages

SD Exam

The document outlines various building environmental assessment methods, including BEAM Plus, BCA Green Mark, CASBEE, Pearl Rating System, BREEAM, and BERDE, each tailored to specific regional needs and sustainability goals. Key similarities among these systems include a focus on environmental sustainability, energy and water conservation, and indoor environmental quality, while also offering tiered certification levels to encourage higher performance. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, reflecting their unique contexts and objectives in promoting sustainable building practices.

Uploaded by

Helen Guzman
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

BEAM Plus (Building Environmental Assessment Method) Innovation in green practices, such as vertical greening (BEAM Plus)

Location: Predominantly used in Hong Kong for evaluating the environmental and advanced green strategies (BCA Green Mark), is encouraged to
performance of existing buildings. push beyond basic sustainability standards.
Case Study: EMSD Headquarters, which transformed an air cargo terminal into Certification Tiers:
a sustainable facility, achieving BEAM Platinum Rating. Both schemes use tiered rating levels (such as Platinum, Gold) to
Key Improvements: incentivize higher levels of sustainability, with stricter requirements for
Energy Efficiency: Large solar PV system with over 2,300 panels, higher certification levels.
renewable energy features (solar trees, rainwater harvesting).
Waste Management: Recycling initiatives, waste audit, food waste
decomposer.
Water Conservation: Rainwater recycling, low-flow fixtures.
Eco-Friendly Operations: Green purchasing, pest control, ISO50001 for
energy efficiency. CASBEE (Comprehensive Assessment System for Building
BCA Green Mark Environmental Efficiency)
Location: Singapore, assessing environmental sustainability in buildings.  Origin: Japan, developed by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport,
Example: Guoco Midtown in Singapore’s CBD achieved BCA Green Mark and Tourism.
Platinum Award (2020).  Goal: Evaluates building environmental performance across the entire
Key Criteria for Certification: lifecycle, focusing on sustainable building practices.
Climatic Responsive Design: Minimizes energy needs by aligning with  Criteria:
climate conditions. o Ecology: Assesses energy use, water consumption, and waste.
Resource Stewardship: Responsible natural resource use and waste o Human Environment: Indoor air quality, daylight, and thermal
reduction.
comfort.
Smart and Healthy Building: Uses technology for enhanced indoor
environmental quality. o Economic Efficiency: Focuses on construction and operating
Building Energy Performance: Reduces energy consumption and costs.
increases comfort. o Operation & Management: Looks at energy, water use, and
Advanced Green Efforts: Encourages innovative green strategies. waste management.
Integrated Design and Construction Management o Community & Society: Considers local materials, job creation,
This concise overview highlights key aspects of both BEAM Plus and BCA Green and accessibility.
Mark, providing foundational insights into sustainable building certification.  Advantages: Comprehensive assessment, tailored for Asian climates, high
Here are the similarities between the BEAM Plus and BCA Green Mark focus on environmental and human factors.
certification schemes:  Disadvantages: Complex and costly certification limited global
Focus on Environmental Sustainability: recognition.
Both BEAM Plus and BCA Green Mark emphasize reducing the Pearl Rating System (PRS) for Estidama
environmental impact of buildings by evaluating their energy
efficiency, water conservation, and waste management.
 Origin: United Arab Emirates, designed by Abu Dhabi Urban Planning
Council.
Energy Efficiency:
Both systems prioritize energy savings, encouraging renewable energy  Goal: Enhances sustainability in construction and quality of life, addressing
sources, efficient lighting, and equipment. For instance, the BEAM- environmental, economic, and social factors.
certified EMSD Headquarters has solar PV systems, and BCA Green  Categories:
Mark buildings incorporate climatic responsive designs to minimize o Integrated Development: Synergy between project systems for
energy demands. high performance.
Water Conservation: o Natural Systems: Protects surrounding natural assets and
Water management is central to both schemes, which promote low- habitats.
flow fixtures, rainwater harvesting, and efficient plumbing systems to o Outdoor Buildings: Promotes comfortable, active urban outdoor
reduce water usage in buildings.
spaces.
Indoor Environmental Quality:
Ensuring a healthy indoor environment is a shared goal. BEAM Plus and o Indoor Buildings: Focuses on indoor air quality, thermal comfort,
BCA Green Mark assess factors like indoor air quality (IAQ), thermal and daylight.
comfort, and use of non-toxic materials to enhance occupant health o Water & Energy Conservation: Efficient use of water and
and well-being. renewable energy.
Resource and Material Stewardship: o Resourceful Energy: Emphasizes energy efficiency and
Both frameworks encourage the responsible sourcing and use of renewable sources.
materials, recycling, and waste reduction throughout the building o Material Stewardship: Reduces long-term environmental
lifecycle. impacts.
Innovative and Sustainable Design:
o Innovation: Encourages sustainable, cost-beneficial solutions.
 Advantages: Tailored to UAE's climate and culture, straightforward criteria,  Origin: Created in the Philippines in 2010, tailored for the tropical climate
strong government support. and local needs.
 Disadvantages: Limited to energy and water efficiency, over-reliant on  Objective: Promote eco-friendly practices, improve indoor quality, and
local standards. advance disaster resilience.
Comparison Summary  Sustainable Features:
 CASBEE is broad, covering social and economic aspects with flexible 1. Energy Efficiency: High-performance glazing, energy-efficient
applications, suited for various building types and life cycle stages. It lighting.
incorporates the UN Sustainable Development Goals but places less 2. Water Conservation: Rainwater harvesting, low-flow fixtures,
emphasis on water and energy as individual categories. greywater recycling.
 Pearl Rating System focuses on environmental factors, particularly water 3. Indoor Environmental Quality: Use of low-VOC materials,
and energy, and uses a tiered certification system for increasing natural lighting.
performance levels. It is more specialized for the UAE context and less 4. Materials: Emphasis on recycled and locally sourced materials.
adaptable to other regions. 5. Waste Management: Construction waste recycling and
Similarities: management programs.
1. Focus on Environmental Sustainability: 6. Sustainable Site Development: Green roofs and native
2. Life Cycle Approach: landscaping.
3. Energy and Water Conservation: 7. Transportation: Access to public transport and bicycle facilities.
4. Indoor Environmental Quality:  Benefits:
5. community and Social Impact: o Market Competitiveness: Enhances project sustainability and
6. Encouragement of Innovation: transparency.
7. Tiered Certification Levels: o Regulatory Compliance: Guides policies in line with
8. Both systems have multiple certification levels (e.g., CASBEE’s "S environmental standards.
Rank" to "C" and PRS’s 1 to 5 Pearls), incentivizing higher levels of o Health and Well-being: Promotes indoor air quality and natural
sustainability performance. light.
o Climate Change Mitigation: Reduces greenhouse gas emissions.
 Key Similarities
Environmental Focus:
Comprehensive Rating:
Voluntary Certification:
BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Performance-Based:
Method) Adaptability: Differences
 Origin: Developed in the UK in 1990; one of the first green building rating Regional Focus:
systems. o BREEAM: UK-based, applicable worldwide; focuses on
 Objective: Reduce environmental impact, enhance occupant well-being, technological innovations.
and support global ESG and net-zero goals. o BERDE: Philippines-based, focusing on tropical climate resilience
 Assessment Categories: and disaster preparedness.
1. Energy Use: Promotes renewable energy, efficient heating, and
lighting systems.
 Economic Impact:
2. Health and Well-being: Focuses on air quality, temperature, o BREEAM: International marketability, attracting global investors.
lighting, and acoustics. o BERDE: Aligns with local priorities, supporting the Filipino
3. Pollution: Reduces emissions from building operations. economy and resilience to local challenges.
4. Transport: Encourages public transport access and bicycle
facilities.
5. Materials: Uses sustainable, non-toxic, responsibly sourced
materials.
6. Waste: Emphasizes waste minimization and recycling.
7. Water: Efficient water management and low-flow fixtures.
8. Land Use and Ecology: Preserves biodiversity and green spaces.
 Benefits:
o Environmental: Reduced carbon emissions, resource
conservation, biodiversity protection.
o Economic: Lower operational costs, increased property value,
market competitiveness.
o Social: Enhanced indoor air quality, improved occupant well-
being, positive brand image.
BERDE (Building for Ecologically Responsive Design Excellence)

You might also like