Court Cases Related to Students’ Rights and Responsibilities
Pierce v. Society of the
Plaintiff: Society of the Sisters
Defendant: Governor of Oregon (Pierce)
Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Sisters of the Holy Names
Facts: Oregon law required all children to attend public schools, threatening private education.
Main Issue: Can a state compel public school attendance only?
Decision: No; it violated parental rights under the 14th Amendment.
of Jesus and Mary (1925) Appeals: Affirmed.
Plaintiff: State of New Jersey
Defendant: Mr. and Mrs. Massa
New Jersey v. Massa Court: New Jersey Superior Court
Facts: Parents homeschooled their daughter using equivalent instruction.
(1967)
Main Issue: Does home instruction meet compulsory education standards?
Decision: Yes.
Appeals: Conviction reversed.
Plaintiff: Kuhlmeier (student)
Defendant: Hazelwood School District
Hazelwood School District Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Facts: Principal removed articles from a school-sponsored newspaper.
v. Kuhlmeier (1988)
Main Issue: Can schools censor student publications?
Decision: Yes, if related to educational concerns.
Appeals: Reversed Court of Appeals decision.
Plaintiff: State of New Jersey
Defendant: T.L.O. (student)
Court: U.S. Supreme Court
New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985) Facts: Student searched by a vice principal led to drug evidence.
Main Issue: Are school searches constitutional without probable cause?
Decision: Yes, with reasonable suspicion.
Appeals: Reversed state Supreme Court.
Tinker v. Des Moines
Plaintiff: Tinker (student)
Defendant: Des Moines School District
Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Independent Community Facts: Students wore black armbands to protest the Vietnam War.
Main Issue: Are peaceful student protests protected by the First Amendment?
Decision: Yes.
School District (1969) Appeals: Ruling reversed in favor of students.
Plaintiff: Lopez and other students
Defendant: Goss (school superintendent)
Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Goss v. Lopez (1975) Facts: Students were suspended without a hearing.
Main Issue: Are students entitled to due process for suspensions?
Decision: Yes.
Appeals: Affirmed lower court decision for students.
Owasso Independent
Plaintiff: Kristja Falvo (parent)
Defendant: Owasso School District
Court: U.S. Supreme Court
School District No. I-011 v.
Facts: Parent challenged peer grading as a FERPA violation.
Main Issue: Are peer-graded assignments protected under FERPA?
Decision: No.
Falvo (2002) Appeals: Supreme Court ruled for district.
Plaintiff: Jane Doe (student)
Defendant: Knox County Board of Education
Doe v. Knox County Board Court: U.S. District Court (E.D. Kentucky)
Facts: School disclosed a student’s private medical info to the media.
of Education (1996)
Main Issue: Does FERPA allow a §1983 claim for such disclosures?
Decision: Yes, if info is personally identifiable.
Appeals: Jury to determine liability.
The School Board of Palm
Plaintiff: William Anderson (parent)
Defendant: Palm Beach County School Board
Court: Florida Appellate Court
Beach County v. Anderson Facts: Student shot on campus after previous violent incidents.
Main Issue: Does a school owe a duty to prevent foreseeable harm?
Decision: Yes.
(1982) Appeals: Affirmed jury verdict for plaintiff.
Plaintiff: Darlene Logan (student)
Logan v. City of New York Defendant: City of New York
Court: New York Supreme Court
(1989)
Facts: Student assaulted on school grounds while unsupervised.
Main Issue: Was the school negligent?
Decision: Yes; schools must act as a prudent parent would.
Appeals: Supreme Court reinstated summary judgment for the school.
Plaintiff: J.S. (student)
Defendant: Bethlehem Area School District
J.S. v. Bethlehem Area Court: Pennsylvania Supreme Court
Facts: Student made a threatening website off-campus.
School District (2002)
Main Issue: Can off-campus speech be disciplined by the school?
Decision: Yes, due to school disruption.
Appeals: All levels ruled for the school district.