0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views16 pages

Gains from Trade and Specialization

The document discusses the concept of gains from trade, emphasizing the importance of economic interdependence among individuals and nations. It explains absolute and comparative advantage through a hypothetical scenario involving a farmer and a rancher, illustrating how specialization and trade can enhance overall production and consumption. The key takeaway is that trade benefits all parties by allowing them to focus on their comparative advantages.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views16 pages

Gains from Trade and Specialization

The document discusses the concept of gains from trade, emphasizing the importance of economic interdependence among individuals and nations. It explains absolute and comparative advantage through a hypothetical scenario involving a farmer and a rancher, illustrating how specialization and trade can enhance overall production and consumption. The key takeaway is that trade benefits all parties by allowing them to focus on their comparative advantages.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Gains From Trade

Reference: Chapter 3, Principles of Economics, G. Mankiw, 10th edition

Md. Nazmul Hossain


Assistant Professor of Economics, University of Dhaka
Going to cover
• Why do people – and nations – chose to be economically
interdependent?
• How can trade make everyone better off?
• What is absolute advantage?
• What is comparative advantage?
• The answers to these questions are key to understanding the
global economy.
• Most countries today import from abroad many of the goods and services
they consume, and they export to foreign customers much of what they
produce.
Assumptions
• Two People:
• Farmer (Frank) and Rancher (Ruby)
• Two goods:
• Potato and Meat
• Each works 8 hours per day.
• Poduce potato or meat or combination of both.
• Assume that opportunity costs for each individual remain same
for all levels of production.
• So, PPF will be linear/straight line.
Assumptions

• Farmer
• produces an ounce of meat in 60 minutes and
• an ounce of potatoes in 15 minutes.
• Rancher
• can produce an ounce of meat in 20 minutes and
• an ounce of potatoes in 10 minutes.
• Who is better at chicken production and who is better at potato production?
Production Possibility Frontier

• Farmer
• can produce 8 ounces of meat in 8 hours (and no potatoes).
• can produce 32 ounces of potatoes in 8 hours (and no meat).
• Rancher
• can produce 24 ounces of meat in 8 hours (and no potatoes).
• can produce 48 ounces of potatoes in 8 hours (and no meat).
Production Possibility Frontier
Production Possibility Frontier
No Trade

• Frank and Ruby remain self-


sufficient instead of trading
with each other.
• Each consumes exactly what
he or she produces.
• Frank decides to produce and
consume 16 ounces of
potatoes and 4 ounces of
meat.
• Ruby decides to produce and
consume 24 ounces of
potatoes and 12 ounces of
meat.
Negotiation for Trade
• Farmer will produce only potatoes.
• So, 32 ounces of potatoes (in 8 hours).
• Rancher will produce
• 18 ounces of chicken (in 6 hours).
• 12 ounces of potatoes (in 2 hours).
• Farmer will give 15 ounces of potatoes to Rancher.
• Rancher will give 5 ounces of chicken to Farmer.
After Trade
Gains From Trade
Driving Force for Specialization
• Recall the answer to the question:
• Who is better at meat production and who is better at potato production?
• Answer: Ruby the rancher is better at both goods’ production.
• Puzzle:
• If Ruby is better at both, how can Frank ever specialize in potato
production?
• To solve this puzzle:
• We need to look into the question:
• Who can produce potato at lower cost – Frank or Ruby?
• We can answer the question in TWO ways.
Absolute Advantage
• The ability to produce a good using fewer inputs than another
producer.

• Ruby has aboslute advantage in both meat and potato production.


• For 1 ounce meat, Ruby needs 20 minutes where Frank needs 60 minutes.
• For 1 ounce potato, Ruby needs 10 minutes where Frank needs 15
minutes.
Comparative Advantage
• The ability to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another producer.

• Suppose Ruby wants 1 ounce of meat.


• Ruby needs 60 minutes for 1 ounce of meat.
• In 60 minutes, Ruby can produce 4 ounces of potatoes.
• To get 1 ounce of meat Ruby give up 4 ounces of potatoes.
• Hence, for Ruby, opportunity cost of 1 ounce of meat is 4 ounces of potatoes.
Comparative Advantage

• Ruby has comparative advantage in meat production.


• For meat, Ruby’s opportunity cost is lower
• Frank has comparative advantage in potato production.
• For potato, Frank’s opportunity cost is lower.
• Although it is possible for a person to have an absolute advantage in both
goods (as Ruby does in our example), it is impossible for a person to have a
comparative advantage in both goods.
Gains from Trade and Comparative Advantage
• The gains from specialization and trade are based on comparative
advantage.
• Trade can benefit everyone because it allows people to specialize
in the activities in which they have a comparative advantage.

Should Sakib Al Hasan wash his own clothes?

You might also like