0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views1 page

Polluter Pays Principle

The document discusses the Polluter Pays Principle (PPP) within the context of Indian environmental jurisprudence, highlighting its legal framework, judicial cases, and enforcement challenges. It emphasizes the principle's evolution, key court rulings, and the economic implications of pollution liability, while also addressing issues such as weak enforcement, legal disparities, and the impact on marginalized communities. The document critiques the effectiveness of PPP in achieving environmental justice and accountability in India.

Uploaded by

riya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views1 page

Polluter Pays Principle

The document discusses the Polluter Pays Principle (PPP) within the context of Indian environmental jurisprudence, highlighting its legal framework, judicial cases, and enforcement challenges. It emphasizes the principle's evolution, key court rulings, and the economic implications of pollution liability, while also addressing issues such as weak enforcement, legal disparities, and the impact on marginalized communities. The document critiques the effectiveness of PPP in achieving environmental justice and accountability in India.

Uploaded by

riya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

06/04/2025, 22:40 Polluter Pays Principle - A look at Indian Environmental Jurisprudence.

The link provided next to the "polluter pays principle"


will lead you to a drive link which will also have the pdf
enclosed below. after downloading the pdf, by just a tap
on the topic from Chart on the second page will direct you
to the respective topic. (For Example, if you click on
introduction of the topic given in the chart on 2nd page,
you'll be directed to the introduction in the same pdf.)

RP Riya Pimple

➤ OECD (1972) + Rio Declaration (1992)


➤ Adopted via: Liability Laws + Emissions Trading + Global Origin + Evolution Polluter → Pays, not Public nor Govt
Pollution Tax (EU, US)
NGT's Formula: Guesswork + Company Size + Project Cost
= Compensation
Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. UOI
Court: Polluter = Pay Compensation 💰 + Restore Restorative Justice + Punitive Action
(1996) Introduction
Environment 🌿
Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. UOI (1996)
Samir Mehta: Oil spill → ₹100 Cr compensation.
Economic and Financial aspect of polluter pays
Cases
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 → Sec 3(3), 5, 15 principle Gurpreet Singh Bagga: Illegal mining → ₹50 Cr per miner.
➤ Water Act, 1974 → Sec 17, 25, 33A
➤ Air Act, 1981 → Sec 21, 22, 31A Uncertain Damage → Still Responsible
➤ Power to Penalize + Shut Polluters 🚫

PPP = Stockholm (1972) 🌍 + EPA (1986) 🛡️ + SC Verdicts ​ 2024 Rules = Polluter Pays → If Unknown, ERF Pays
⚖️
Judicial Goal= Deter Pollution + Restore Nature
Union Carbide/Bhopal Gas Leak – $470M "pittance", PPP Bhopal Case Failure
undermined. Govt 💼 + Weak Deal 🤝 = Victims Ignored + PPP ⛔ Legal empowerment: S14 (Jurisdiction) + S15 (Relief &
Restoration) + S17 (Liability) + S20 (Env. Principles)
Strict Liability Laid the Ground
Dangerous Acts → Foreseeable Damage → Strict Implementation in Practice : Fines + Clean-up Orders +
Case: Rylands v. Fletcher Constitutional aspect and legal basis in India
Liability Shutdowns

Damage Assessment by NGT: Science + Fair


No Escape with Care: Absolute Liability Rules Compensation + Smart Fund Use
MC Mehta v. UOI (Oleum Gas Case) – Introduced Absolute
Hazardous Activity → Harm → Full Liability (Even with National Green Tribunal
Liability in India.
Care) case M.C. Mehta v. UOI 1986

M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath – Pollution = Civil Wrong. Pay for the Mess You Made Impact of PPP Enforcement
Pollution Deterrence + Accountability Boost + Real
Restoration
Pollution + Non-compliance ➝ Authority Action (Sec 3, Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
5) ➝ Penalties + Cost Recovery (Sec 15)
PPP ≠ Instant Justice
Delays + Defiance + Deadlock = Weak Enforcement
Effluent Discharge + No Consent (Sec 25) ➝ Shutdown Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974
Orders (Sec 33A) ➝ Financial Liability
Polluter Pays Principle (PPP) ➤ Hard to trace diffuse/historic/cross-border polluters
Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 Legislative Framework Implementation Issues ➤ Cost valuation = complex 🧮
Emissions > Standards ➝ Closure Orders (Sec 31A) +
Emissions > Standards ➝ Closure Orders (Sec 31A) + ➤ Weak enforcement + corruption + legal disparity
Fines
Fines
➤ Global South = heavier burden 🌍⬇️
Hazardous Waste Rules, 2016 Economic & Equity Concerns ➤ Costs ➝ consumers ➝ hits poor hardest
Hazardous Waste + Unsafe Disposal ➝ Generator Liable
Hazardous Waste + Unsafe Disposal ➝ Generator Liable ➤ SMEs struggle, big players dominate 🏢
+ EPR Applied ➝ Cost Recovery by Govt.
+ EPR Applied ➝ Cost Recovery by Govt.
➤ Violates CBDR principle
Jan Chetna v. MoEF Ethical & Moral Criticism ➤ Treated as "license to pollute" 🧾
PPP + Sustainable Development ➝ Judicial Validation ➤ Neglects intergenerational equity 🧒🌳

Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages v. WBPCB ➤ Weak global control (e.g., Paris Agreement limits)
Industry Pollution ➝ PPP Enforced ➝ Cost Assessment Global Governance Gaps ➤ MNCs exploit loopholes 🔍
by WBPCB (Not Court) ➤ Industrial lobbying slows PPP enforcement

Vanashakti v. MPCB Legal & Judicial Framework Supporting PPP in ➤ No uniform PPP law
River Pollution by CETPs + Industries ➝ INR 760M India Legal + Institutional Gaps ➤ Overlaps: CPCB vs SPCBs vs NGT
Compensation (Restitution + Rehab) ➤ Boards = underfunded & powerless
Criticism and Challenges
NGT Bar Assoc. (SZ) v. Tamil Nadu ➤ Big industries escape (e.g., Vedanta)
Illegal Tank Collapse ➝ Suo Motu Action ➝ INR 7.5M ➤ Public enterprises = leniently treated
(Victims + Environment) Selective Enforcement
➤ Informal polluters = ignored
Judicial Framework
Perma Nand Khanta v. Himachal Pradesh
Tourism-Linked Pollution ➝ Green Tax on Vehicles ➝ ➤ Fines = too low (e.g., LG Polymers)
State’s Environmental Fund Compensation & Remediation Issues ➤ Restoration funds = misused/unspent
India-Specific Challenges
➤ Communities = left out 😞
Vardhaman Kaushik v. UOI
Vehicular Pollution ➝ Environmental Compensation ➤ PPP = case-based, not systemic
Charge ➝ SC Upheld with Hike Long-Term Harm Ignored
➤ Climate change = rarely addressed

amuna River Case – NGT (General Order) ➤ Civil society = excluded


Diffuse Pollution + No Clear Polluter ➝ Citizens Pay Transparency + Public Role ➤ No open access to pollution data 📉
Environmental Compensation ➤ PILs = delayed + less impactful

Volkswagen Emission Scandal (2019) ➤ Development > Environment (e.g., EIA 2020)
Cheat Device + Emission Manipulation ➝ ₹500 Cr Fine Policy Conflicts
➤ Poor EPR (e.g., PepsiCo/Coca-Cola non-compliance )
by NGT

https://whimsical.com/polluter-pays-principle-a-look-at-indian-environmental-jurisprud-G4DziK32jBpPEuaxixE7vw 1/1

You might also like