Annexure J2
POST ASSESSMENT MODERATION TOOL
NAME OF SCHOOL
Meadowlands Secondary School
DISTRICT
Johannesburg West
LEVEL AND PHASE OF
MODERATION
SUBJECT
English First Additional Language
GRADE 11
TASK MODERATED Cycle Test
NAME OF MODERATOR Ms Zamisa
TECHNICAL ASPECTS
Quality Indicators Comment in FULL sentence
1. The question paper is complete with Yes.
the marking guideline and
assessment grid analysis.
2. The cover page has all the relevant Page numbers are missing.
details such as subject, grade,
duration, date, marks allocation, and
number of pages.
3. Instructions to candidates are clearly Yes.
specified and unambiguous
4. Mark allocation is clearly indicated Yes.
per question.
5. The mark allocation on the question Yes.
paper is the same as on the marking
guideline.
6. The quality of illustration, pictures, Yes
graphs, diagrams.
7. The marking guideline is efficient in Yes.
terms of sufficient alternatives and
allows consistent marking.
1
STANDARD OF THE TEST
1. The task assesses all specific core Yes.
content and skills that should be
covered in this term as per the ATP.
2. The distribution of different cognitive Yes.
levels as per policy. Indicate the
distribution.
3. Different types of questions used Yes.
(Multiple choice, matching type,
missing words, open-ended, etc.)
4. The correct terminology of the Yes.
subject was used to design the test
5. The language used is appropriate Yes.
for the level of learners.
MARKING
1. Quality of marking by the teacher.
(Consistency, accountability of ticks, Yes
relevance of marking tool)
2. Marking of all sections of the task.
Signature and dating of the tasks during Yes
marking
3. Compliance to marking standards as Yes.
outlined in the marking guideline (e.g.,
writing of subtotals)
4. Evidence of extended opportunities to None
learners who did not submit tasks due to
valid reason
5. Accuracy of calculation of marks on each
learner’s task. Yes.
6. Incidence of lenient marking, global None.
marking, or unmarked questions but
marks awarded to learners (specify)
7. Correlation between the awarding of Yes.
marks by the teacher and learner
responses
8. Performance analysis of each task by the None
teacher.
9. Evidence of feedback to learners by the Yes.
teacher and its possible impact on the
improvement of learner performance.
10. Any other comment on marking. Yes.
2
RECORDING
1. The use of correct SA SAMS working Yes.
marksheets and the patch
2. Accuracy of transference of marks from Yes.
learner evidence of work to the SA SAMS
marksheet.
3. Evidence of learners who missed SBA task None.
is provided in the teacher file.
LEARNER PERFORMANCE
1. The quality and standard of learner Learners struggle with summary writing.
responses to each question type.
2. The influence of standard of the test on The examination is fair.
the performance of the learners.
3. Do you think the style of marking and Marking was fair and consistent.
recording may have had impact on the
performance of learners? Elaborate
4. The learner performance in the task is Yes.
comparable to performance in other formal
tasks (consult the SASAMS working
marksheets)
Questions which were not attempted/poorly answered by learners and possible
causes.
Poorly answered Nature of the Possible reasons Recommendations
questions challenge/Type of
question
Question 2: summary Learners lack reading Learners cannot read for
writing skills. meaning.
3
SCHOOL BASED MODERATION
1. Evidence of pre- and post-assessment Yes.
moderation of the test? Elaborate
2. Quality of moderation at each level.
Use of relevant colour pens.
3. Feedback provided to the teacher by the Yes.
Departmental Head/Teacher
Moderator/Subject Advisor?
4. Implementation of recommendations None.
suggested by the moderator at each level.
5. Evidence of HISTORY of the task provided. Yes.
6. SA SAMS marksheet signed by the teacher, Yes.
departmental head, and the subject specialist.
COMPUTER GENERATED MARKSHEETS (For the last phase of grade 12 moderation only)
1. Transfer of marks from the SA SAMS working Yes.
mark sheet to the copy of computerized
marksheet
2. Correct code awarded for blanks and “0” mark
on the marksheet
3. Copy of computerized marksheet signed off by Yes.
DH and Principal.
OVERALL IMPRESSION BY THE MODERATOR
Areas of Good Practice Challenges Recommendations
Learners seem to understand
visual literacy
4
Name of learners whose files were moderated in each level of moderation.
Name and surname of Educator Mark Moderated Mark
learner
1. Mpanza avela 42/60 42/60
2. Dlamini Sanele 23/60 23/60
3. Hlomla Colelo 37/60 37/60
4. Mokhgathi Tshegofatso 27/60 27/60
5. Kwanele Mogama 28/60 28/60
6. Karabo mokoena 26/60 26/60
MODERATORS NAME SIGNATURES DATE
School Moderator
Departmental Head Ms Zamisa 28/03/2024
Cluster Moderator
District Moderator
Provincial Moderator
