TERM PAPER TITLE :

The Challenges of Governance and Leadership on Social Transformation:

Looking at Women and Their Coping Techniques

SUBMITTED BY

MANYO MIRACLE NYEN

DEPARTMENT: SOCIOLOGY AND SOCIAL WORK, OBONG UNIVERSITY, ETIM-

EKPO L.G.A, AKWA-IBOM STATE.

REG NO: U2SSW2303

COURSE CODE: SOC 227

COURSE TITLE: WOMEN IN SOCIETY

SUBMITTED TO

LECTURER: DR. WILLIE CLEMENT.

DATE: 11TH AUGUST, 2025.

ABSTRACT:

Social transformation is the process by which societies move from one state of social, economic,
or political arrangement to another. It is shaped decisively by governance and leadership. This
paper examines the challenges that governance and leadership pose to social transformation, with
a particular focus on how these challenges affect women and the coping techniques women
employ. Drawing on theoretical insights from political sociology and leadership studies, and
synthesizing empirical observations from gender and development literature, the paper argues
that while governance failures and leadership gaps can impede inclusive transformation, women
continuously deploy adaptive strategies to navigate, resist, and influence change. The paper ends
with policy recommendations for more gender-responsive governance and leadership.

INTRODUCTION:

Social transformation involves structural shifts in institutions, norms, resource distribution, and
power relations. Governance is the institutions, rules, and processes by which collective
decisions are made. The individuals and groups that drive agendas are central to how
transformation unfolds. For women, who frequently occupy disadvantaged positions in social
hierarchies, the stakes are especially high: governance choices and leadership styles determine
access to resources, participation in public life, and the reshaping of gender norms. This paper
explores the primary governance and leadership challenges that hinder progressive social
transformation and details the coping techniques women use to survive and reshape these
processes.

CONCEPTUAL AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK:

Governance is understood here as the ensemble of formal institutions (state, local government,
bureaucracy), informal institutions (patriarchal norms, community structures), and processes
(policy-making, implementation, accountability mechanisms) that regulate collective life.
Leadership refers to the agents political leaders, civil society actors, community elders, and
movement organizers whose visions and actions influence governance outcomes.
The draws on two complementary theoretical lenses:

i. Political-sociological perspectives on power and institutions: Institutions both enable

and constrain social actors. Historical institutionalism helps explain why certain
governance structures persist and how path dependency can lock in unequal gender
relations (Thelen, 1999).

ii. Leadership theory (transformational vs transactional): Transformational leadership

seeks systemic change by inspiring followers to transcend self-interest; transactional
leadership focuses on exchanges and short-term gains (Burns, 1978). Both styles have
implications for social transformation: transformational leaders can mobilize change but
may be limited by institutional inertia; transactional leaders may preserve stability at the
expense of reform.

A gender-sensitive reading overlays both lenses, highlighting how formal rules and informal
practices interact to produce gendered outcomes (Kabeer, 1999).

MAJOR CHALLENGES OF GOVERNANCE AND LEADERSHIP FOR SOCIAL

TRANSFORMATION

1. Institutional Rigidity and Path Dependence

Many governance systems are anchored in long-standing legal codes, bureaucratic

practices, and informal customs that resist rapid change. This rigidity creates barriers to
reforms aimed at gender equality—laws may be slow to change, and administrative
procedures may reproduce exclusionary practices. Path dependency makes incremental
adaptation more likely than radical transformation (Pierson, 2000).

2. Weak Accountability and Corruption

Where accountability mechanisms are weak and corruption is widespread, public

resources are diverted and policies fail to reach intended beneficiaries. For women—
particularly those who are poor, rural, or otherwise marginalized—this reduces the
 effectiveness of programs designed to improve health, education, or economic
participation (Transparency International, 2022).

3. Leadership Capture and Elite Interests

Leadership positions are often dominated by privileged elites who prioritize their
interests. Elite capture undermines participatory governance, marginalizes women’s
voices, and shapes policy outcomes in ways that maintain existing gender hierarchies
(Acemoglu & Robinson, 2012).

4. Normative and Cultural Barriers

Social norms and cultural beliefs often limit women’s participation in public life and
constrain leaders who might pursue gender-progressive policies. Political actors may
avoid contentious gender reforms for fear of backlash, and governance institutions may
selectively enforce norms that disadvantage women (Cornwall & Rivas, 2015).

5. Fragmentation and Policy Incoherence

Effective transformation requires cross-sectoral coordination. Fragmented bureaucracies,

overlapping mandates, and incoherent policy frameworks produce gaps in service
delivery and limit the ability to implement holistic gender-responsive reforms (UN
Women, 2020).

6. Leadership Style Mismatch

A prevalence of transactional leadership focused on patronage and short-term deal-

making can stall long-term projects for social transformation. Conversely, charismatic or
transformational leaders may face institutional pushback if they lack coalition-building
skills or if institutions are unreceptive to rapid change (Burns, 1978).

7. Resource Constraints and Prioritization

Limited public budgets and competing priorities force governments to make choices.
When gender concerns are not politically prioritized, programs that would accelerate
women’s empowerment are underfunded or neglected (World Bank, 2012).
HOW WOMEN EXPERIENCE THESE CHALLENGES

Women experience governance and leadership failures in specific ways:

i. Reduced access to public services: When governance systems fail, services like
maternal health, education, and social protection become unreliable, disproportionately
affecting women (Sen, 1999).

ii. Political exclusion: Formal barriers (e.g., restrictive electoral systems) and informal
barriers (patriarchal social expectations) lower women’s representation in leadership
positions (UN Women, 2020).

iii. Economic vulnerability: Corruption and weak policy implementation can reduce access
to microcredit, land titles, or market opportunities that could economically empower
women (Kabeer, 1999).

iv. Heightened risk of violence: Weak rule of law and unresponsive leadership increase
women’s vulnerability to gender-based violence and limit redress (Cornwall & Rivas,
2015).

COPING TECHNIQUES EMPLOYED BY WOMEN

Women do not merely wait for institutional change; they act. Their coping techniques can be
grouped into survival strategies, adaptive strategies, and transformative strategies.

1. Survival Strategies

i. Informal economic activity: Women often rely on informal trading, small-scale

entrepreneurship, and domestic labour to ensure household survival when formal jobs or
safety nets are absent (Chen, 2012).
 ii. Social networks and mutual aid: Extended kinship networks, savings groups, and
rotating credit associations (ROSCAs) provide crucial financial and emotional support
(Bouman, 1995).

iii. Negotiation within households: Women negotiate resource allocation and decision-
making at the household level to protect children’s welfare and preserve household
stability (Kabeer, 1999).

2. Adaptive Strategies

i. Pragmatic political engagement: Where open contestation is dangerous or costly,

women engage in clientelist politics or patronage networks to secure resources or
protection for their families and communities (Goetz, 2003).

ii. Skill-building and education: Women invest in education and vocational training as a
long-term hedge against structural exclusion (King & Hill, 1993).

iii. Strategic use of formal institutions: Women may use the legal system, where possible,
to claim rights (land inheritance, custody) even when institutions are imperfect, thereby
creating precedents (Tripp et al., 2009).

3. Transformative Strategies

i. Collective organizing and social movements: Women’s movements, grassroots

associations, and community-based organizations mobilize around issues such as land
rights, violence prevention, and political representation (Tripp et al., 2009).

ii. Leadership from the margins: Women often take on leadership roles in local
governance structures (school boards, cooperatives), building leadership capacity and
demonstrating alternatives to male-dominated leadership (Cornwall & Rivas, 2015).

iii. Innovative policy entrepreneurship: Women civil servants, politicians, or activists act
as policy entrepreneurs introducing gender-sensitive policies, pilot programs, and new
norms within institutions (Kingdon, 2011).
CASE ILLUSTRATIONS

1. Community Savings Group as Alternative Governance: In many settings where state

services are weak, women form savings and loan groups that manage local credit, support
education fees, and provide social insurance. These groups function as parallel
governance structures that redistribute resources and build women’s collective agency
(Bouman, 1995).

2. Women’s Political Caucuses: Women in legislative bodies sometimes form cross-party

caucuses to push for gender-responsive budgeting or anti-violence legislation. These
caucuses illustrate how women navigate elite institutions to create incremental reform
(Tripp et al., 2009).

3. Legal Test Cases: Strategic litigation initiated by women’s groups can force policy
change or create legal precedents, particularly around property rights and gender-based
violence (Goetz, 2003).

DISCUSSIONS: Limits and Potentials of Women’s Coping Techniques

Women’s strategies are creative and resilient, but they face limits. Survival tactics often have
limited spill over into systemic change; informal economic activity can relieve poverty but may
reinforce precariousness. Adaptive strategies can secure incremental gains but risk reinforcing
clientelist relations. Transformative actions hold the greatest potential for structural change but
require sustained resources, alliances, and favourable political windows.

The capacity of women to convert coping into transformation depends on several enabling
conditions: supportive legal frameworks, civic spaces for organizing, access to resources
(financial, informational, human), and leadership allies who can amplify change within formal
institutions (Kabeer, 1999).

POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
 1. Strengthen Gender-Responsive Institutions: Reform bureaucratic procedures to
remove barriers to women’s access (e.g., simplify land registration, protect maternity
benefits) and institutionalize gender audits.

2. Invest in Women’s Leadership Development: Provide training, mentoring, and funding

for women leaders at local and national levels to expand the pipeline of transformational
leaders.

3. Enhance Accountability and Transparency: Combat corruption and strengthen

participatory accountability (citizen report cards, gender-sensitive budgeting) so
resources intended for women are delivered.

4. Protect Civic Space: Ensure legal protections that allow women’s movements and civil
society to organize, litigate, and advocate without undue repression.

5. Support Hybrid Governance Mechanisms: Recognize and partner with women-led

informal institutions (savings groups, cooperatives) rather than trying to displace them.

6. Adopt Intersectional Policies: Design programs that recognize diversity among women
(class, ethnicity, rural/urban) so interventions do not benefit only the already-advantaged.

CONCLUSION

Governance and leadership are decisive determinants of social transformation. While

institutional rigidities, elite capture, weak accountability, and cultural norms pose substantial
challenges especially for women. Women’s coping techniques show remarkable resourcefulness.
From informal mutual aid to political organizing and policy entrepreneurship, women both
mitigate the harm of governance failures and actively shape possibilities for transformation. For
durable change, policy-makers and leaders must create enabling institutional environments that
elevate women’s voices, reduce barriers, and transform coping strategies into sustained structural
gains.

REFERENCES
• Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power,
prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business.

• Bouman, F. J. A. (1995). ROSCA: On the origin of the species. Savings and

Development, 19(2), 117–148.

• Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.

• Chen, M. A. (2012). The informal economy: Definitions, theories and policies. WIEGO
Working Paper, (1).

• Cornwall, A., & Rivas, A. (2015). From gender equality and women’s empowerment to
global justice: Reclaiming a transformative agenda for gender and development. Third
World Quarterly, 36(2), 396–415.

• Goetz, A. M. (2003). Women’s political effectiveness: A conceptual framework. In No

shortcuts to power: African women in politics and policy making (pp. 29–80). Zed
Books.

• Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of

women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464.

• King, E., & Hill, M. A. (1993). Women’s education in developing countries: Barriers,
benefits, and policies. World Bank.

• Kingdon, J. W. (2011). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (Updated 2nd ed.).
Longman.

• Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics.
American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.

• Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of

Political Science, 2, 369–404.

• Transparency International. (2022). Corruption perceptions index 2022.

[Link]
• Tripp, A. M., Casimiro, I., Kwesiga, J., & Mungwa, A. (2009). African women’s
movements: Transforming political landscapes. Cambridge University Press.

• UN Women. (2020). Women’s full and effective participation and decision-making in

public life. [Link]

• World Bank. (2012). World development report 2012: Gender equality and development.
World Bank.