JSTOR Citation List

@comment{{ These records have been provided through JSTOR. [Link] }}

@inbook{10.2307/j.ctt18z4hg5.1,
ISBN = {9781626162433},
URL = {[Link]
author = {Jason Reimer Greig},
booktitle = {Reconsidering Intellectual Disability: L'Arche, Medical Ethics, and
Christian Friendship},
pages = {[i]--[vi]},
publisher = {Georgetown University Press},
title = {Front Matter},
urldate = {2025-08-21},
year = {2015}
}

@inbook{10.2307/j.ctt18z4hg5.2,
ISBN = {9781626162433},
URL = {[Link]
author = {Jason Reimer Greig},
booktitle = {Reconsidering Intellectual Disability: L'Arche, Medical Ethics, and
Christian Friendship},
pages = {[vii]--[viii]},
publisher = {Georgetown University Press},
title = {Table of Contents},
urldate = {2025-08-21},
year = {2015}
}

@inbook{10.2307/j.ctt18z4hg5.3,
ISBN = {9781626162433},
URL = {[Link]
abstract = {In early 2004 the parents of six-year-old Ashley X were faced with the
prospect of her early puberty. Because Ashley’s embodiment includes profound
intellectual and physical impairments, along with the continual use of a
wheelchair, she remained highly dependent on her parents for all personal care.
Thus Ashley’s parents chose to implement therapy for their daughter that would
prematurely stop her physical growth. They decided on this treatment in
consultation with her medical specialists and the ethics committee of the Seattle
Children’s Hospital. In addition to attenuation therapy to restrict her growth,
further treatments included the surgical removal of her},
author = {Jason Reimer Greig},
booktitle = {Reconsidering Intellectual Disability: L'Arche, Medical Ethics, and
Christian Friendship},
pages = {1--18},
publisher = {Georgetown University Press},
title = {INTRODUCTION},
urldate = {2025-08-21},
year = {2015}
}
@inbook{10.2307/j.ctt18z4hg5.4,
ISBN = {9781626162433},
URL = {[Link]
abstract = {Although Ashley’s parents may have felt that their allowing the
various procedures she received was an “easy decision,” the plethora of responses
for and against the Ashley Treatment (AT) point to the fact that many others do not
agree. Responses and analyses have come from the mainstream media, bioethicists,
disability advocates, legal theorists, medical professionals, and parents of
children with disabilities. The variety of people who have been involved in
discussing the Ashley case reveal its relevance across disciplines and social
worlds, and the sometimes strong reactions it has engendered show how much is at
stake for many [Link]},
author = {Jason Reimer Greig},
booktitle = {Reconsidering Intellectual Disability: L'Arche, Medical Ethics, and
Christian Friendship},
pages = {19--48},
publisher = {Georgetown University Press},
title = {A NEW APPROACH TO AN OLD DILEMMA: The Ashley Treatment and Its
Respondents},
urldate = {2025-08-21},
year = {2015}
}

@inbook{10.2307/j.ctt18z4hg5.5,
ISBN = {9781626162433},
URL = {[Link]
abstract = {Modern medicine has given people with disabilities much to be thankful
for. It has prolonged life for many; people with Down syndrome now routinely live
into their fifties and sixties. The use of technology through prostheses and
assistive devices has enabled and empowered individuals to participate in social
life in ways previously considered unthinkable. And the benefits of medical
technology also extend to people with intellectual disabilities. Many persons with
cognitive impairments born today most likely would never have survived more than a
few months only a century [Link] people with disabilities also discern a shadow
side in the},
author = {Jason Reimer Greig},
booktitle = {Reconsidering Intellectual Disability: L'Arche, Medical Ethics, and
Christian Friendship},
pages = {49--81},
publisher = {Georgetown University Press},
title = {EXPOSING THE POWER OF MEDICINE THROUGH A CHRISTIAN BODY POLITICS},
urldate = {2025-08-21},
year = {2015}
}

@inbook{10.2307/j.ctt18z4hg5.6,
ISBN = {9781626162433},
URL = {[Link]
abstract = {Baconian medicine, as one of the “powers,” has proven to be a
discursive force in forming Western society’s views about the impaired body. The
medical model of disability that sprang from this vision of the human good pervades
vast domains in modernity, including health care institutions, social service
bureaucracies, and popular culture. Even much of the church and its praxis have
succumbed to the power of technological medicine’s pathologizing and
instrumentalizing of the disabled body. The church’s and society’s lack of
theorizing and comfort about disability too often have meant that they can only
fall back on the medical model},
author = {Jason Reimer Greig},
booktitle = {Reconsidering Intellectual Disability: L'Arche, Medical Ethics, and
Christian Friendship},
pages = {82--113},
publisher = {Georgetown University Press},
title = {DISABILITY, SOCIETY, AND THEOLOGY: The Benefits and Limitations of the
Social Model of Disability},
urldate = {2025-08-21},
year = {2015}
}

@inbook{10.2307/j.ctt18z4hg5.7,
ISBN = {9781626162433},
URL = {[Link]
abstract = {“No one would choose to live without friends, even if he had all other
goods.”¹ So speaks Aristotle from the distant past—as well as to late modern
society. Friendship in late modernity seems pervasive through the ubiquitous forms
of social media, yet profoundly fleeting when it comes to actual people’s lives.
This is particularly the case for people with intellectual disabilities, whose
situations of relational poverty strike at the heart of Aristotle’s maxim. For the
most part, people with cognitive impairments either remain confined within the
bioethical discourse of pathology and cure or exist as “clients” and “residents”
within},
author = {Jason Reimer Greig},
booktitle = {Reconsidering Intellectual Disability: L'Arche, Medical Ethics, and
Christian Friendship},
pages = {114--157},
publisher = {Georgetown University Press},
title = {NO LONGER SLAVES BUT FRIENDS: Social Recognition and the Power of
Friendship},
urldate = {2025-08-21},
year = {2015}
}

@inbook{10.2307/j.ctt18z4hg5.8,
ISBN = {9781626162433},
URL = {[Link]
abstract = {Christ offers to all the gift of God’s friendship through the power of
the Holy Spirit. In receiving this gift, the Christian becomes recognized as a
friend of Jesus and summoned into a relationship of mutuality. Concomitantly,
Christ’s friendship also calls Christians to extend this recognition to others. The
gift of God’s friendship cannot be hoarded or kept to oneself but must be passed on
to others, especially those most rejected and despised. God’sphiliahas an
inherently ecstatic nature, desiring to bring ever more people into the divine life
[Link], an essential corollary of the Trinity’s vision},
author = {Jason Reimer Greig},
booktitle = {Reconsidering Intellectual Disability: L'Arche, Medical Ethics, and
Christian Friendship},
pages = {158--200},
publisher = {Georgetown University Press},
title = {THE CHURCH AS A COMMUNITY OF FRIENDS: Embodying the Strange Politics of
the Kingdom},
urldate = {2025-08-21},
year = {2015}
}

@inbook{10.2307/j.ctt18z4hg5.9,
ISBN = {9781626162433},
URL = {[Link]
abstract = {As an embodied faith, Christianity must be seen to be believed.
Authentic Christianity can never be content with mere intellectual affirmations; it
needs models to provoke and inspire the moral imagination. Hence the truth of faith
comes first and foremost through a community of enfleshed believers who are
realizing a compelling (even if strange) vision of human life and social relations.
If the Church wants to offer an alternative to procedures such as the Ashley
Treatment (AT), it must not only deconstruct the “power” of Baconian medicine but
must also witness to a more compelling vision in its common life.},
author = {Jason Reimer Greig},
booktitle = {Reconsidering Intellectual Disability: L'Arche, Medical Ethics, and
Christian Friendship},
pages = {201--244},
publisher = {Georgetown University Press},
title = {BEHOLDING THE POLITICS OF THE IMPOSSIBLE: L’Arche as an Embodiment of the
Church as a Community of Friends},
urldate = {2025-08-21},
year = {2015}
}

@inbook{10.2307/j.ctt18z4hg5.10,
ISBN = {9781626162433},
URL = {[Link]
abstract = {This book has argued against the moral acceptability of the Ashley
Treatment. Although some could argue that the treatment’s medical procedures
violate Ashley’s human dignity, more fundamentally it misrecognizes Ashley as a
static object to be technologically modified.¹ In a way that is fully consistent
with Baconian medicine’s reductionist and instrumentalist tendencies, framing
Ashley as a pathological body in need of fixing appears legitimate in a late modern
politics of autonomy and self-representation. Yet in a Christian theological
politics of dependence, where even radical bodily limitations signal not gross
anomaly but commonality, the bodies of people with profound cognitive impairments},
author = {Jason Reimer Greig},
booktitle = {Reconsidering Intellectual Disability: L'Arche, Medical Ethics, and
Christian Friendship},
pages = {245--258},
publisher = {Georgetown University Press},
title = {CONCLUSION},
urldate = {2025-08-21},
year = {2015}
}
@inbook{10.2307/j.ctt18z4hg5.11,
ISBN = {9781626162433},
URL = {[Link]
author = {Jason Reimer Greig},
booktitle = {Reconsidering Intellectual Disability: L'Arche, Medical Ethics, and
Christian Friendship},
pages = {259--278},
publisher = {Georgetown University Press},
title = {BIBLIOGRAPHY},
urldate = {2025-08-21},
year = {2015}
}

@inbook{10.2307/j.ctt18z4hg5.12,
ISBN = {9781626162433},
URL = {[Link]
author = {Jason Reimer Greig},
booktitle = {Reconsidering Intellectual Disability: L'Arche, Medical Ethics, and
Christian Friendship},
pages = {279--294},
publisher = {Georgetown University Press},
title = {INDEX},
urldate = {2025-08-21},
year = {2015}
}

@inbook{10.2307/j.ctt18z4hg5.13,
ISBN = {9781626162433},
URL = {[Link]
author = {Jason Reimer Greig},
booktitle = {Reconsidering Intellectual Disability: L'Arche, Medical Ethics, and
Christian Friendship},
pages = {295--295},
publisher = {Georgetown University Press},
title = {Back Matter},
urldate = {2025-08-21},
year = {2015}
}