Offshore Wind Technology Overview
Offshore Wind Technology Overview
Contents
Nomenclature .......................................................................................................................................... 2
Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 3
1. Introduction- ................................................................................................................................... 3
1.1 Evaluation of wind power and Offshore wind forms ......................................................... 4
1.2 Current status of offshore wind Technology ........................................................................... 6
1.3 Sustainable Siting of Offshore Wind Farms............................................................................ 6
2 Introduction to Wind Turbine Plants ............................................................................................... 7
2.1 Wind Turbine and its Types .................................................................................................... 7
2.1.1 Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines....................................................................................... 8
2.1.2 Vertical Axis Wind Turbines ........................................................................................... 9
2.2 Key Components of Wind Turbine ......................................................................................... 9
2.2.1 Turbine ............................................................................................................................ 9
2.2.2 Tower .............................................................................................................................. 9
2.2.3 Nacelle .......................................................................................................................... 10
2.2.4 Control Mechanism ....................................................................................................... 10
3 Basic Principle of Offshore Wind ................................................................................................. 10
3.1 Wind Energy Conversion process for Offshore wind turbine ............................................... 10
3.2 Strategic framework for Offshore Wind Energy Project development in India .................... 11
4 Comparison with Onshore Wind Turbines .................................................................................... 12
4.1 Onshore versus Offshore wind energy development ............................................................ 12
4.2 Power capacity factor of Onshore and Offshore wind energy system .................................. 13
4.3 Recent trends of Onshore and Offshore wind power generation .......................................... 13
4.4 Levelized cost of onshore and offshore wind energy systems .............................................. 14
5 Installation Techniques and Foundations ...................................................................................... 14
5.1 Overview of Offshore wind turbine installation ................................................................... 14
5.1.1 Installation vessels Equipments and methods ............................................................... 15
5.1.2 Standards and Guidelines .............................................................................................. 17
5.2 Types of Offshore Wind Turbine Foundations ...................................................................... 17
5.2.1 Gravity base foundations .............................................................................................. 18
5.2.2 Monopile foundations ................................................................................................... 18
5.2.3 Multipod (Tripod + Jackets) types foundations ............................................................ 18
5.2.4 Floating foundations ..................................................................................................... 19
1
6 Connection to the Power Grid....................................................................................................... 19
6.1 Key Design Considerations for Offshore Grids .................................................................... 20
6.2 Components of the Offshore Grid ......................................................................................... 20
6.2.1 Offshore Wind Turbines ................................................................................................ 20
6.2.2 Offshore Array Cables................................................................................................... 20
6.2.3 Offshore High Voltage Alternating Current (HVAC) Substations................................. 21
6.2.4 Offshore High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) Converter Stations............................. 21
6.2.5 Submarine Export Cables.............................................................................................. 21
6.2.6 Landfall & Onshore Cables........................................................................................... 22
6.2.7 Onshore HVDC Converter Stations .............................................................................. 22
6.2.8 Onshore HVAC Substations .......................................................................................... 22
6.3 Connection Type ................................................................................................................... 22
7 Environmental and Economic Benefits......................................................................................... 23
7.1 Environmental benefits of offshore wind power ................................................................... 23
7.2 Economic Opportunities: Jobs, Local Development, and Industry Growth ......................... 24
7.3 Role of Offshore wind in facilitating low carbon development ............................................ 24
8 Challenges and Environmental Impacts ........................................................................................ 25
8.1 Environmental impacts of offshore wind power ................................................................... 25
8.1.1 Noise Emissions and Vibrations.................................................................................... 25
8.1.2 Impact on birds.............................................................................................................. 25
8.1.3 Magnetic and Electric field ........................................................................................... 25
8.2 Recommendations for mitigation of environmental impacts ................................................ 26
8.3 Challenges for offshore wind ................................................................................................ 26
9 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 26
References ......................................................................................................................................... 27
Nomenclature
HVAC High Voltage Alternating current
HVDC High Voltage Direct Current
GOWA Global Offshore Wind Alliance
GWEC Global Wind Energy Council
IRENA International Renewable Energy Agency
MNRE Ministry of New and Renewable Energy
OWF Offshore Wind Farms
OWT Offshore Wind Technology
EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone
NIWE National Institute of Wind Energy
2
OM Operation and Maintenance
VGA Viability Gap Funding
OWEC Offshore Wind Energy Converters
HAWT Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine
VAWT Vertical Axis Wind Turbine
MVAC Medium Voltage Alternating Current
WT Wind Turbine
EPR Ethylene Propylene Rubber
XLPE Cross-linked Polyethylene
HV High Voltage
DFIG Doubly Fed Induction Generator
Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of offshore wind technology, focusing on its importance,
development, and potential on a global scale. It starts by examining wind power, particularly
offshore wind farms, and their distribution worldwide. The chapter also highlights critical
factors for choosing suitable sites for wind turbines. It covers the different types and
components of wind turbines, how offshore wind energy is converted into power, and the
development framework for offshore wind projects, with a particular focus on India. A
comparison with onshore wind systems examines their power capacity, economic aspects, and
costs. Installation methods, turbine foundations, and relevant standards and guidelines are also
discussed.
The chapter further explores how offshore wind farms are connected to the grid, considering
systems like HVAC and HVDC, and addresses the challenges specific to offshore
environments. It also examines the environmental and economic advantages of offshore wind
energy, especially its role in reducing carbon emissions, while acknowledging the challenges
it poses to marine life and birds. Finally, the chapter looks at the latest trends, innovations, and
future prospects for offshore wind energy.
This analysis is intended as a helpful resource for policymakers, engineers, and researchers
who aim to develop offshore wind energy as a sustainable solution for the future.
1. Introduction-
In recent decades, the global push toward cleaner renewable energy sources has driven
significant advantages in wind energy technology, with offshore wind emerging as one of the
most promising solutions. Offshore wind farms capitalize on stronger, more consistent wind
resources found over the ocean, where wind speed is typically higher and turbulence is lower
than onshore. This promising renewable energy source holds the potential to power entire
coastal regions, significantly reducing dependence on fossil fuels and lowering greenhouse gas
emissions.
Offshore wind energy has experienced substantial growth in recent years, with installed
capacity now exceeding 35 GW. Projected annual growth rates are expected to remain above
30 % through 2025[1].The addition of 8.8 GW in new installations has raised the global
3
offshore wind power capacity to 64.3 GW, reflecting a y-o-y (year-on-year) growth rate of 16
%. This expansion accounts for 7 % of cumulative global offshore wind installations [2].Fig. 1
displays the global offshore wind installation between 2023 to 2032.
In September 2022, Denmark's government, along with IRENA and GWEC, founded the
Global Offshore Wind Alliance (GOWA) to promote global offshore wind adoption through
political engagement and the formation of a global network of practitioners. GOWA's
objectives include achieving at least 380 GW of global offshore wind capacity by 2030 and
2,000 GW by 2050, with an average annual deployment of 35 GW throughout the 2020s and a
minimum of 70 GW per year starting in 2030[3].GOWA envisions offshore wind playing a key
role in energy transition and advancing sustainable development goals by generating large-
scale renewable power. This shift will benefit regions, nations and critical sectors like industry
and transport.
Fig. 1 Total Global Offshore wind added between 2023 and 2032 [2]
From 2019 to 2023, global installed offshore wind capacity surged by 157 %, increasing from
28.29 GW to 72.66 GW. This growth is largely concentrated in Asia and Europe with China ,
United Kingdom and Germany leading the way, holding 37.29 GW, 14.74 GW and 8.41 GW
of capacity respectively [4].India’s Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) recently
set a target of achieving 5 GW of offshore wind capacity by 2022 and 30 GW by 2030. With a
7,600 km coastline, India has the potential to generate up to 127 GW of offshore wind energy
[5].
4
This ancient windmill represents an early adaptation of wind power for mechanical work,
showcasing humanity’s long-standing ingenuity in harnessing natural forces for daily needs.
Offshore wind energy is generated by harnessing wind over the sea. Wind results from the sun's
uneven heating of the earth’s surface. A wind turbine converts the wind’s kinetic energy into
mechanical or electrical energy, which can be used for practical purposes. As wind flows across
the rotor blades, it causes them to spin, which drives a shaft connected to the rotor hub,
ultimately producing usable energy[7].
Offshore wind energy development has progressed from modest beginnings to a vital
component of global renewable energy strategies. Initiated in the 1990s, Denmark pioneered
offshore wind with its Vindeby wind farm in 1991, using small turbines in shallow waters [9].
By the 2000s, European countries like the United Kingdom, Germany, and the Netherlands
started scaling up offshore wind farms, deploying larger turbines, and developing foundation
technologies like monopiles to reach deeper waters. Turbine sizes increased, allowing more
power to be generated per unit. In the 2010s, offshore wind became increasingly cost-effective
due to technological improvements, economies of scale, and government incentives. This
period also saw the initial development of floating wind technology designed for deep-water
installations. Since 2020, offshore wind has grown substantially, with China now leading in
global capacity, followed by Europe and the UK. The United States, though a late entrant, is
accelerating its offshore wind expansion with initiatives under the Inflation Reduction Act.
Floating wind farms have gained traction, enabling installations in deep waters like Japan and
the U.S. West Coast.
5
1.2 Current status of offshore wind Technology
The current status of offshore wind technology highlights rapid global advancements and
increasing contributions to renewable energy goals. Since the installation of the world's first
offshore wind power plant in Denmark in 1991, the offshore wind industry has experienced
significant growth, with expectations for even faster expansion in the coming years[11] . At
present, there exist 112 offshore wind farms that are actively functioning across the globe,
alongside 53 initiatives that are either in the pre-construction phase or currently under
construction, as illustrated in Fig. 3. Additionally, there are 712 more projects that are at varying
stages of planning and development, underscoring the sector's substantial pipeline and its vital
importance in the worldwide transition towards renewable energy sources[12].
Future offshore are primarily being developed in countries with existing experience and
infrastructure for this technology. Europe remains a leader in offshore wind development,
notably the United Kingdom, Germany, and the Netherlands. Meanwhile, China has emerged
as the largest market, with the most installations completed in 2023[13]. Nevertheless,
numerous additional countries, such as India, Greece, Finland, Norway, Brazil, Canada,
Australia, Croatia, Sri Lanka, Poland, and Cyprus, are commencing active participation in the
development of offshore wind energy. This increasing engagement reflects a more extensive
international dedication to utilizing offshore wind energy within the framework of renewable
energy initiatives.
Fig. 3 Offshore Wind Farms at pre, post and future construction phase
Offshore wind energy gained growing appeal due to its vast available offshore spaces and
significant energy potential. The turbulence in Offshore wind farms (OWF) is less than
onshore, leading to much higher wind speed and generating a huge amount of electricity.
Offshore wind energy was first introduced in northern Europe. European offshore wind farms
6
are mainly located in the North-sea and Baltic Sea, particularly in Denmark, Sweden, Germany,
and the Netherlands. The region’s consistent seabed depth and strong winds enable the
installation of offshore wind turbines for efficient wind power generation[15].The choice of
site is crucial to the technical, social, economic, and environmental success of OWF projects.
Many nations are currently facing increasing limitations in assessing the best locations for
offshore wind generation. Energy companies now place greater emphasis on the factors that
influence investment and the acceptability of offshore wind farm site selection[16].
Research on OWF site selection has enhanced our understanding of the factors that will shape
the future of OWFs. Numerous criteria have been identified for site selection, including
weather conditions, operational profitability, environmental impact, social factors (such as
community and local acceptance), power network accessibility (grid integration), shipping
density, incentives, and regional characteristics and so on[17].
In 2022, wind power generation saw a record increase of 265 TWh, a 14% rise, bringing the
total to over 210 TWh. This marked the second-largest growth among all renewable energy
sources, trailing only solar PV. However, to align with the Net Zero Emissions by 2050 scenario
which projects wind power generation at roughly 7400 TWh by 2030, the annual growth rate
must rise to around 17%. This means that annual capacity additions need to surge from 75 GW
in 2022 to 350 GW by 2030. Achieving this ambitious target will require significant efforts
from both policymakers and the private sector, particularly in improving processes for onshore
wind and reducing costs for offshore wind projects[18].
7
Where, Pw is the power output from the wind.𝜌, 𝐴 and 𝑣 are the air density, swept area of the
wind turbine blades, and wind speed respectively. The formula provides the power available in
the wind passing through the area swept by the turbine blades. The actual power that can be
captured by the turbine is less than this value due to efficiency losses and the Betz limit, which
states that no turbine can capture more than 59.3% of the kinetic energy in the wind[21].
Wind turbines come in a wide range of sizes. The primary determinant of a wind turbine's
capacity to produce power is the length of its blades. A single home could be powered by a
small wind turbine with a 10kW electric-generating capability. The largest wind turbines
currently in operation can generate roughly 15,000 kilowatts (15 megawatts) of electricity.
There are plans to construct larger turbines. In order to generate electricity for electric power
systems, wind turbines are frequently placed together to form wind farms[22].The fig. 4 depicts
the various kinds offshore wind technology.
Fig.4 (a) Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine (HAWT), (b) Vertical Axis Wind Turbine (VAWT),
(c) Domestic (small scale) HAWTs, (d) Domestic (small scale) VAWT (Savonius type), (e)
Domestic (small scale) VAWT (Darrius type) [23]
8
and farm mills, which have an efficiency of 15 %. It is suitable for areas with wind shear and
placement on uneven land or in offshore locations.
Low-speed rotors or turbines usually have two to six blades, with three-blade designs being the
most common. Three-blade turbines are more stable, efficient, and lightweight. Turbines can
range in size, from a few kilowatts (used in standalone remote areas) to several megawatts for
large-scale power generation. The blades are aerodynamic and designed to be as lightweight as
possible.
2.2.2 Tower
Most modern wind turbine towers are made of round tubular steel, with a diameter of 3–4
meters (10–13 feet) and a height of 75–110 meters (250–370 feet). The height of the tower
depends on the size of the turbine and its location. A general rule is that the tower's height is
about the same as the diameter of the circle made by the rotating blades.
9
2.2.3 Nacelle
A nacelle is a wind turbine part containing essential components like the generator, shafts,
gearbox, brake, and control mechanism. It’s attached to the tower using a yaw control
mechanism, which helps it to rotate to face the wind. Inside the nacelle, there are two shafts: a
low-speed shaft and a high-speed shaft. The rotor turns the low-speed shaft at 30 to 60 rpm. A
gearbox increases the speed of this rotation, transferring it to the high-speed shaft, which spins
at 1200 to 1800 rpm, the speed the generator needs to produce electricity.
2.2.4 Control Mechanism
The control mechanism in a wind turbine helps keep it working safely and efficiently within
certain limits. It can operate either actively or passively, depending on the needs. The system
monitors wind speed, rotor performance and electrical and mechanical values to adjust when
needed. The main goal is to generate the maximum power with the best efficiency, regardless
of changing wind conditions.
OWT uses wind to generate electricity. When the wind blows, it turns the blade. The blades are
connected to a rotor, which turns a shaft connected to a generator. The generator produces
electricity.
• Wind Strength:
10
OWT gets stronger and more consistent winds than onshore turbines, which makes them more
effective at producing electricity.
• Location
These turbines are placed in the water, usually far from the shore. This avoids disrupting
shipping routes and takes advantage of stronger winds over the sea.
• Structure
OWT are supported by special structures designed to survive rough sea conditions. These
structures include floating platforms, large poles (monopiles) sunk into the seabed, or steel
frameworks (jackets).
• Electrical Transmission
The electricity generated by the turbines is sent to shore through underwater cables, where it
connects to the power grid and is used by homes and business.
OWT are far from the land hence maintenance requires special equipments. However, their
location helps keep them out of sight and reduces noise, which is less disruptive for the people
living nearby. OWTs generate electricity by using strong winds at sea, supported by special
structures, and sending power to the grid.
To promote the development of offshore wind farms in the country and speed up the process,
three models have been proposed [26]:
• Model-A (VGF Model) - This approach will apply to specific offshore wind zones
where MNRE/NIWE has conducted or plans to conduct detailed studies. Currently, part
of Zone B3 (365 sq. km) off the coast of Gujarat and a similar area off the Tamil Nadu
coast will be included in the first phase of this plan, totaling 1 GW of capacity. MNRE,
through its agencies, will issue bids to buy offshore wind power under this model.
Financial support will be provided through Viability Gap Funding (VGF) to help
achieve a set power tariff. This support will make it easier for developers to set up wind
farms in these areas.
11
• Model- B (Non-VGF but with exclusivity over seabed during the study/survey
period) - This approach applies to offshore wind sites identified by NIWE, which will
be leased to developers for a fixed period through a bidding process. Developers will
build projects without financial support from the government. The power generated can
be used for the developer's own needs, sold through agreements, or traded on power
exchanges. The government may also seek bids to buy power for distribution companies
after two years, offering benefits like infrastructure support, transmission charge
waivers, renewable energy credits, and carbon credit benefits.
• Model- C (Non-VGF and without exclusivity over seabed during the study/survey
period) - In this model, the developer can choose any offshore wind site within the
EEZ, except the sites already included in Model-A and Model-B. The developer will
conduct studies and surveys for the site. The government will then issue a bid for the
development of the project and allocation of the seabed.
The share of wind energy in India's total renewable energy capacity will grow significantly
with the development of offshore wind power. Regulatory authorities should create policies
and support programs that attract investors, researchers, and public sectors. Policymakers can
consider making an Energy Standard policy that includes special provisions for offshore wind
energy. These provisions can provide direct support to the emerging offshore wind market,
encouraging investment in this area[27].
Offshore wind energy systems need to be built under the sea, which requires stronger support
structures, special cables for power transmission, and special ships and equipment for
installation and maintenance. These extra requirements make offshore wind power much more
expensive compared to onshore wind power. Offshore wind turbines are currently about 1.5
times more expensive than onshore turbines of the same size[29].Offshore wind energy systems
are less noticeable than onshore ones because their size and noise are reduced or eliminated by
being located far out at sea. Offshore wind turbines benefit from more robust and more
consistent winds, which help them produce more electricity than onshore turbines. However,
factors like water depth, distance from shore, shipping routes, and protected nature areas must
be considered when building them. Offshore wind farms face challenges from saltwater, waves,
and intense storms. Access to the sites is also limited by weather conditions, so the turbines
need to be very strong and reliable. However, compared to onshore wind farms, offshore
turbines cause less noise and visual impact[30].
Offshore wind farms have turbines that are more spread out, use bigger equipment, and
generate much more power than onshore wind farms. Offshore wind energy development
introduces new technologies to improve the building and integration of wind systems to the
power grid. It also advances logistics for transporting, installing, operating, and maintaining
12
these systems. This has led to more interest in combining different areas of research to improve
offshore wind energy[31].
4.2 Power capacity factor of Onshore and Offshore wind energy system
The capacity factor is the ratio of the average power a wind farm produces to its maximum
possible power output. Onshore wind farms usually have lower capacity factors because of
their location compared to offshore wind farms. Wind speeds and power across onshore
locations can be affected by natural features like forests and hills and human-made structures
like buildings and towers. These obstacles can block or change the wind, making it less
consistent and not ideal for onshore wind farms, which reduces their power output. Offshore
wind farms, however, don't face these problems because the ocean surface is clear of obstacles,
allowing for more steady wind flows. This makes offshore wind power more reliable than
onshore wind power.
The average capacity factor for new onshore wind power plants has increased from 27% in
2010 to 34 % in 2018, and it is expected to continue growing over the next 30 years. By 2030,
onshore wind farms are projected to have a maximum capacity factor of 55 %, a minimum of
30%, and an average of 42.5%. By 2050, these figures are expected to rise to a maximum of
58%, a minimum of 32, and an average of 45%. Over the next 30 years, the average capacity
factor of offshore wind power facilities is predicted to rise from 38% in 2010 to 43% in 2018.
It is anticipated that offshore wind farms will have an average capacity factor of 47%, a
minimum capacity factor of 36%, and a maximum capacity factor of 58% by 2030. These
figures are expected to increase to an average of 51.5%, a minimum of 43%, and a maximum
of 60% by 2050[32].
Both onshore and offshore wind power are growing rapidly but at different rates. Offshore wind
power is showing strong growth, and its share in global electricity generation is becoming more
noticeable. Currently, onshore wind energy makes up about 95% of global wind power
capacity. However, by 2030, offshore wind is expected to reach a total capacity of 228 GW,
and by 2050, it could grow to 1000 GW, up from the current 55.7 GW. The projected growth
of onshore wind energy, reaching a total capacity of 1787 GW by 2030 and 5044 GW by 2050,
marks significant progress toward transitioning to fully electric power[32].
TABLE- I Global cumulative installed and projected capacities of onshore and offshore wind
power (2018-2050)
13
4.4 Levelized cost of onshore and offshore wind energy systems
The cost is the main factor in deciding whether onshore and offshore wind power can be
successfully developed. Because wind power is cost-effective, it has increased in recent years,
especially when compared to other types of renewable energy. The levelized cost of energy
(LCOE) is commonly used to compare the costs of different energy sources. It represents the
total cost of generating electricity from a power plant, including wind energy, over the plant's
entire lifetime. This helps standardize costs across various energy systems. As compared to
onshore wind power plants, the LCOE of offshore wind power plants is mainly influenced by
factors such as the distance from the shore, load factor, and availability. Additionally, offshore
wind farms incur higher costs for installing mooring systems and long transmission cables.
By 2030, onshore wind power is expected to become entirely cost-effective, with prices
dropping below the lowest cost of fossil fuels (0.05 USD/kWh), ranging from 0.03 USD/kWh
to 0.05 USD/kWh, with an average of around 0.04 USD/kWh. By 2050, the cost is predicted
to fall even further, reaching between 0.02 USD/kWh and 0.03 USD/kWh, with an average of
about 0.025 USD/kWh. As the world moves towards a complete transition, the average global
LCOE for offshore wind power will drop further. By 2030, it is predicted to range from 0.05
USD/kWh to 0.09 USD/kWh. By 2050, the cost is expected to decrease even more, with prices
ranging from 0.03 USD/kWh to 0.07 USD/kWh[34].
Installing OWTs is a complex process involving several key steps, from planning and site
preparation to assembly and connecting to the power grid. It usually begins with designing the
wind farm and selecting suitable locations offshore. Next, the seabed is prepared, which might
involve dredging or installing foundations to support the turbines. The installation involves
assembling various wind turbine components and eventually linking them to the grid. Since
this work happens at sea, it’s considered a marine operation and faces challenges like weather
conditions, safety risks during lifting, and the availability of specialized equipment [35]. The
fig. 6. shows the process involved in installation of integrated offshore wind structures
including foundation, Tower and WT [Link] wind installation is essential for
increasing the amount of renewable energy we use, as it has great potential to generate clean
power. As technology improves and costs decrease, offshore wind energy is expected to
become a more critical part of the world’s energy supply. Developing offshore wind farms is
14
crucial for achieving climate goals, reducing reliance on fossil fuels, and promoting sustainable
energy.
Heavy lift cargo vessels are equipped with spacious cargo holds that allow them to transport
large, heavy modular components tailored to meet the specific needs of a project. During
15
installation, pre-assembled wind turbines or support structures are often lifted with the help of
crane barges and jack-up barges because these lifting tasks require cranes with strong lifting
power. Fig. 7. shows the different vessels used in the OWT installation. An example of a vessel
is the Heavy Lift Cargo vessel used in the Veja Mate offshore wind farm (OWF) project[37],
where it was used to transport 67 transition pieces from Denmark to the Netherlands wind farm
site.
16
5.1.2 Standards and Guidelines
The installation of offshore wind turbines (OWTs), like any other offshore activities, must
follow the guidelines set by regulatory authorities to ensure safety. The planning and execution
of OWT installations should address various aspects, including risk management, operational
criteria, weather forecasts, and structural integrity, as required by the offshore oil and gas
industry. Standards and guidelines for installing offshore wind turbines (OWTs) are important
to ensure safety, efficiency, and environmental protection. These rules cover different parts of
offshore wind farm projects, including planning, design, construction, operation, and
decommissioning. They are created by government authorities, industry groups, and global
organizations to make sure everything is done correctly and safely.
Table III Standards and guidelines for offshore wind turbine installation[39]
STANDARDS TITLE
DNVGL-ST-N001 Marine operations and marine warranty
DNVGL-ST-0378 Standard for offshore and platform lifting appliances
DNVGL-ST-0437 Loads and site conditions for wind turbines
DNV-RP-H103 Modelling and analysis of marine operations
ISO 29400:2015 Ships and marine technology – Offshore wind energy – Port and
marine operations
A few standards relevant to OWT installations are listed in Table III. Among these, the outdated
DNV–OS–H series standards have been replaced by the unified DNVGL-ST-N001 standard.
This new standard provides guidelines for maritime operations related to various offshore
structures. Another comprehensive standard with a similar scope is ISO 29400:2015, which is
relevant to port and marine operations for offshore constructions, including subsea templates,
foundations, and OWTs.
For planning and executing marine operations, DNVGL-RP-H103 offers simplified methods
for determining design loads. Platform cranes and offshore cranes must comply with the
DNVGL-ST-0378 standard. A newer standard, DNVGL-ST-0054, provides safety guidelines
and principles for installing and transporting OWTs and onshore vessels. DNVGL-ST-0437
offers guidelines for wind turbine loads and site conditions[40].
Sea depth is generally divided into three categories: shallow waters (0–30 m), transitional
waters (30–50 m), and deep waters (50–200 m). The depth of the sea is the most important
factor influencing the feasibility of offshore wind farms, as the cost of foundations increases
significantly with depth. As a result, various types of foundations have already been developed,
and others are being designed, considering sea depth and other factors.
17
The most common foundation types for commercial offshore wind energy converters (OWECs)
are shown in the fig. 9. Monopile and gravity-type foundations are the most widely used in
shallow waters. These two types were chosen for the first offshore wind farms due to their
proven reliability in shallow waters. The water depth at potential farm locations and the
capacity of the installed OWECs make monopile foundations particularly popular. For OWECs
larger than 3 MW, gravity-type foundations are not used, as they would be extremely costly
and heavy to construct in deeper waters (over 10 meters), where they must withstand significant
aerodynamic and hydrodynamic loads from large-capacity wind turbines. Test floating OWEC
foundations are designed for very deep sites (e.g., 100–200 meters) and have a high rated
capacity (e.g., 5–6 MW)[41]. Table 4 describes the merits and demerits of different types of
foundations of OWT.
The original foundation type used for OWECs was traditionally a gravity-type foundation,
consisting of a large circular pile with a concrete plate structure resting on the seabed. This
type of foundation was used near shore to build Denmark's first offshore wind farms, where
the water is very shallow. Additionally, because this established construction and installation
method helps reduce risk, it was used in several demonstration projects, including the Avedøre
Holme, Breitling, and Thornton Bank (Phase I) offshore wind farms[43].
The majority of OWECs, particularly offshore wind farms in Europe, use these types of
foundations. Given the conditions of the European seabed, this method is currently the most
cost-effective option. In 2014, 91% of offshore wind farms that were fully grid-connected also
used this type of foundation[44].
To reduce construction costs for transitional water depths, different substructure approaches
are required. Tripods and jacket structures are examples of space-frame substructures that
18
provide the necessary rigidity and strength. With relatively short penetration lengths, tripod
and jacket structures offer adequate bearing capacity at transitional water depths. Additionally,
the economic viability is enhanced by the relatively light weight of tripods and jackets.
Gravity Easy construction process with reliable stability. Requires specific geological
conditions.
Monopile Straightforward manufacturing and robust structural Limited structural rigidity, susceptible
support. to scouring, and needs an extremely
large pile.
Jacket Provides excellent structural stiffness and stability, Complex forces can lead to fatigue,
suitable for deeper waters. with high installation and maintenance
costs.
Tripod High load-bearing capacity, suitable for greater Expensive and challenging to install.
water depths.
Floating Versatile design, suitable for deep waters and areas High dynamic loads and significant
with strong underwater currents. operational costs.
The offshore wind sector is expanding globally, and as of 2023, Hornsea II, the largest AC-
connected offshore wind power plant in the world, is completely operational in the United
19
Kingdom with a total of 1.386 GW, powering 1.3 million homes[46]. The connection of
offshore wind farms to the grid involves several critical steps and technologies to ensure
efficient and reliable integration into modern power systems.
• Capital Cost: The capital cost of installing and connecting offshore wind farms to the
grid is high, with transmission costs accounting for 20% of the total cost.
• Electrical Losses: Depending on the export voltage and offshore distance,
transmission losses typically range between 2% and 5%. The location of the meters
and the distribution of transmission losses among various stakeholders influence their
valuation.
• Grid Code Compliance: Ensure that the offshore grid complies with national and
regional grid codes, including requirements for frequency regulation, reactive power
support, and fault-ride-through capabilities.
• System redundancy and Resilience: The risk exposure to single points-of-failure
(such as underwater transmission cables) must be carefully examined and reduced in
design and specification because offshore transmission systems are typically not fully
redundant due to the high construction expenditures.
• System Stability and Control: Incorporate advanced control systems to manage
power flow, voltage, and frequency fluctuations caused by variable wind generation.
The offshore grid architecture can be significantly influenced by the electrical rating and
performance of offshore wind turbines. Currently, 8 MW offshore wind turbines are available,
with 9 MW versions awaiting final qualification[48]. All offshore wind turbines currently
available on the market operate based on Type 3 or Type 4 designs, which correspond to the
electrical generator and power converter configurations, specifically the Doubly Fed Induction
Generator (DFIG) and Full Converter, respectively. These designs incorporate power
electronics, enabling them to support grid stability by meeting current grid code requirements
for voltage management and fault ride-through. Among these, the highly adaptable full-
converter (Type 4) design constitutes the majority of offshore wind turbines on the market
today[49].
20
into a single cable. They use extruded insulation materials, such as cross-linked polyethylene
(XLPE) or ethylene propylene rubber (EPR), and are of a wet or semi-wet type. This means
they lack an extruded, water-blocking metallic sheath, making them lighter and more cost-
effective than offshore high-voltage cables.
The dimensions of array cables are typically specified by the conductor's cross-sectional area
(CSA), with 630 mm² generally considered the maximum practicable size for handling in an
offshore wind farm and connection to 33 kV wind turbine switchgear. In this configuration, a
single array cable can carry a maximum power of approximately 35–40 MW.
For transmitting power over longer distances, an HVDC transmission system is used. The
HVDC converter station converts HVAC to HVDC for power transmission to shore. This
conversion takes place at the HVDC converter stations and is more complex and expensive
than HVAC substations. Currently, offshore HVDC converter stations with ratings of up to
800-900 MW are in use, with 1000 MW being the realistic maximum for a single system. These
stations typically operate at +-20 kV and above however, newer designs tend to focus on +-
300 to 320 kV DC[50].
Extruded insulation is also commonly used in HVDC cables for VSC applications. These cables
typically consist of two single-core cables with positive and negative polarity and operate at up
to 400 kV. The cable voltage must match that of the offshore HVDC converter station, and they
are often installed in the same underwater trench.
21
Fig. 10 HVAC and HVDC submarine cables [51]
In contrast to their offshore counterparts, onshore HVDC converter stations convert HVDC
power back to HVAC and adjust it to the appropriate voltage for injection into the onshore
grid. Each manufacturer has its own unique design for these massive facilities, which house
complex electrical and control technologies.
• High-voltage switchgear
• Harmonic filters, which may be needed based on grid code requirements and the
specific characteristics of the local grid.
The connections of offshore wind farms can be classified into the following types: Medium
Voltage AC (MVAC), High Voltage AC (HVAC), and High Voltage DC (HVDC). MVAC is
22
typically used within the wind farm to link individual turbines to an offshore substation,
operating at 33 or 66 kV. HVAC connections transmit power from the offshore substation to
the onshore grid over short to moderate distances, ranging from 110 kV to 400 kV. HVDC
connections are preferred for long-distance transmission due to their efficiency and lower
power losses, utilizing voltage levels of ±200 kV to ±400 kV or higher. The choice of
connection type depends on factors such as distance to shore, efficiency requirements, and
project costs.[52].
As clean energy projects, the construction and operation of offshore wind farms have limited
environmental pollution. In parallel, large-scale development and construction of wind power
equipment typically occupy habitats to a certain extent and cause disturbances to the marine
ecological environment, which could alter marine life behavior. There are also positive
examples, however. One study suggests that offshore wind foundation structures have positive
23
and long-term effects on aquatic species because they provide new habitats in artificial reefs
and because fishing – mainly trawling – tends to be restricted in their vicinity[54].
25
cables heat the surrounding sediments, attracting species that prefer warmer conditions or
driving away those sensitive to heat.[58]
9 Conclusion
The chapter highlights the crucial role of offshore wind technology in the global move toward
sustainable and low-carbon energy. Offshore wind energy uses the strong and steady winds at
sea to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions and fight climate change. With
improvements in turbine technology, grid connections, and installation methods, offshore wind
farms are becoming more efficient and cost-effective, making them a key part of renewable
energy plans.
26
The future of offshore wind involves increasing its capacity, upgrading infrastructure, and
adopting new technologies like green hydrogen production and energy storage. Innovations
such as floating wind farms open up opportunities to use wind energy in deeper waters, making
offshore wind possible in areas that were previously unsuitable. While challenges like high
costs, environmental effects, and complex regulations remain, advancements in technology,
better planning, and improved logistics will help address these issues.
References
[1] D. Rowell, D. McMillan, and J. Carroll, “Offshore wind H&S: A review and analysis,”
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 189, p. 113928, Jan. 2024, doi:
10.1016/[Link].2023.113928.
[2] “GWEC-Global-Offshore-Wind-Report-2023.”
[3] “Fostering a blue economy: Offshore renewable energy”.
[4] “Renewable Energy Statistics 2024”.
[5] “Roadmap for India’s Offshore Wind Energy,” Drishti IAS. Accessed: Nov. 12, 2024.
[Online]. Available: [Link]
offshore-wind-energy
[6] G. Müller, M. Chavushoglu, M. Kerri, and T. Tsuzaki, “A resistance type vertical axis wind
turbine for building integration,” Renew. Energy, vol. 111, pp. 803–814, Oct. 2017, doi:
10.1016/[Link].2017.05.017.
[7] “Chapter 2. Offshore renewable energy options.”
[8] “Wind Energy Timeline – From Persian Windmills Crushing Grains to Vesta’s Wind
Turbines Churning out 8 MW of Output | AltEnergyMag.” Accessed: Nov. 15, 2024.
[Online]. Available: [Link]
timeline-%E2%80%93-from-persian-windmills-crushing-grains-to-vesta%E2%80%99s-
wind-turbines-churning-out-8-mw-of-output/19496
[9] “Offshore Wind | MINISTRY OF NEW AND RENEWABLE ENERGY | India.” Accessed:
Nov. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: [Link]
[10] S. P. Neill and M. R. Hashemi, “Chapter 4 - Offshore Wind,” in Fundamentals of Ocean
Renewable Energy, S. P. Neill and M. R. Hashemi, Eds., in E-Business Solutions. ,
Academic Press, 2018, pp. 83–106. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-810448-4.00004-5.
[11] “(PDF) Study of indicators on regulation for offshore wind energy exploitation in
Brazil.” Accessed: Nov. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available:
[Link]
_for_offshore_wind_energy_exploitation_in_Brazil
[12] H. Díaz and C. Guedes Soares, “Review of the current status, technology and future
trends of offshore wind farms,” Ocean Eng., vol. 209, p. 107381, Aug. 2020, doi:
10.1016/[Link].2020.107381.
[13] A. McCoy et al., “Offshore Wind Market Report: 2024 Edition (Executive Summary),”
NREL/TP--5000-90921, 2434295, MainId:92699, Aug. 2024. doi: 10.2172/2434295.
[14] P. Gkeka-Serpetsidaki, G. Skiniti, S. Tournaki, and T. Tsoutsos, “A Review of the
Sustainable Siting of Offshore Wind Farms,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 14, Art. no. 14,
Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16146036.
27
[15] “A study on offshore wind farm siting criteria using a novel interval-valued fuzzy-rough
based Delphi method,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 270, p. 110916, Sep. 2020, doi:
10.1016/[Link].2020.110916.
[16] L.-W. Ho, T.-T. Lie, P. T. Leong, and T. Clear, “Developing offshore wind farm siting
criteria by using an international Delphi method,” Energy Policy, vol. 113, pp. 53–67, Feb.
2018, doi: 10.1016/[Link].2017.10.049.
[17] M. Deveci, E. Özcan, and R. John, “Offshore Wind Farms: A Fuzzy Approach to Site
Selection in a Black Sea Region,” in 2020 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference
(TPEC), Feb. 2020, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/TPEC48276.2020.9042530.
[18] “Wind - IEA.” Accessed: Nov. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available:
[Link]
[19] S. C. Bhatia, “8 - Wind energy,” in Advanced Renewable Energy Systems, S. C. Bhatia,
Ed., Woodhead Publishing India, 2014, pp. 184–222. doi: 10.1016/B978-1-78242-269-
3.50008-5.
[20] S. K. Singh, S. Singh, and R. Sharma, “Dynamic Performance Analysis of Grid-
Connected Wind-DFIG System using STATCOM-SESS,” in 2022 IEEE 9th Uttar Pradesh
Section International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering
(UPCON), Dec. 2022, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/UPCON56432.2022.9986443.
[21] “Wind Turbine Market 2014-2020 Latin America Most Lucrative Region According to
Fmi Research Paper.” Accessed: Nov. 22, 2024. [Online]. Available:
[Link]
America/116864/
[22] “Types of wind - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).” Accessed: Nov. 23,
2024. [Online]. Available: [Link]
[Link]
[23] F. Alam and Y. Jin, “The Utilisation of Small Wind Turbines in Built-Up Areas:
Prospects and Challenges,” Wind, vol. 3, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Dec. 2023, doi:
10.3390/wind3040024.
[24] A. Faizan, “Wind Turbine Parts and Functions,” Electrical Academia. Accessed: Nov.
23, 2024. [Online]. Available: [Link]
turbine-parts-functions/
[25] G. Nagababu, S. S. Kachhwaha, and V. Savsani, “Estimation of technical and economic
potential of offshore wind along the coast of India,” Energy, vol. 138, pp. 79–91, Nov.
2017, doi: 10.1016/[Link].2017.07.032.
[26] “Microsoft Word - Offshore_strategy paper _Revised 250923.”
[27] P. K. Chaurasiya, V. Warudkar, and S. Ahmed, “Wind energy development and policy
in India: A review,” Energy Strategy Rev., vol. 24, pp. 342–357, Apr. 2019, doi:
10.1016/[Link].2019.04.010.
[28] B. Desalegn, D. Gebeyehu, B. Tamrat, T. Tadiwose, and A. Lata, “Onshore versus
offshore wind power trends and recent study practices in modeling of wind turbines’ life-
cycle impact assessments,” Clean. Eng. Technol., vol. 17, p. 100691, Dec. 2023, doi:
10.1016/[Link].2023.100691.
[29] “Offshore wind power development in Europe and its comparison with onshore
counterpart - ScienceDirect.” Accessed: Nov. 27, 2024. [Online]. Available:
[Link]
[30] J. Markard and R. Petersen, “The offshore trend: Structural changes in the wind power
sector,” Energy Policy, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 3545–3556, Sep. 2009, doi:
10.1016/[Link].2009.04.015.
28
[31] A. Fernández-Guillamón, K. Das, N. A. Cutululis, and Á. Molina-García, “Offshore
Wind Power Integration into Future Power Systems: Overview and Trends,” J. Mar. Sci.
Eng., vol. 7, no. 11, Art. no. 11, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.3390/jmse7110399.
[32] “Future of wind.” Accessed: Nov. 28, 2024. [Online]. Available:
[Link]
[33] “Global Wind Report 2022 - Global Wind Energy Council.” Accessed: Nov. 28, 2024.
[Online]. Available: [Link]
[34] “Expert elicitation survey predicts 37% to 49% declines in wind energy costs by 2050
| Nature Energy.” Accessed: Nov. 28, 2024. [Online]. Available:
[Link]
[35] F. Devoy McAuliffe, F. M. Judge, and J. Murphy, “Modelling the installation of next
generation floating offshore wind farms,” Appl. Energy, vol. 374, p. 124001, Nov. 2024,
doi: 10.1016/[Link].2024.124001.
[36] “Heavy lift semi-submersible ships utilization in offshore wind turbines industry -
ScienceDirect.” Accessed: Nov. 30, 2024. [Online]. Available:
[Link]
[37] “Veja Mate Offshore Wind Farm Project, German North Sea.” Accessed: Nov. 30, 2024.
[Online]. Available: [Link]
wind-farm-project/
[38] “Turkish tugboats deliver big bollard pull on trials - Marine Log.” Accessed: Nov. 30,
2024. [Online]. Available: [Link]
bollard-pull-on-trials/
[39] Z. Jiang, “Installation of offshore wind turbines: A technical review,” Renew. Sustain.
Energy Rev., vol. 139, p. 110576, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/[Link].2020.110576.
[40] “[Link].” Accessed: Nov. 30, 2024. [Online]. Available:
[Link]
[Link]
[41] A. Subbulakshmi, M. Verma, M. Keerthana, S. Sasmal, P. Harikrishna, and S. Kapuria,
“Recent advances in experimental and numerical methods for dynamic analysis of floating
offshore wind turbines — An integrated review,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 164, p.
112525, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/[Link].2022.112525.
[42] “(PDF) Wind turbines: current status, obstacles, trends and technologies.” Accessed:
Nov. 30, 2024. [Online]. Available:
[Link]
acles_trends_and_technologies
[43] “Construction of Absolute Gravity Benchmark Offshore With an Atomic Gravimeter |
IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore.” Accessed: Dec. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available:
[Link]
[44] M. Lara, F. Vázquez, I. Sandua-Fernández, and J. Garrido, “Adaptive Active Generator
Torque Controller Design Using Multi-Objective Optimization for Tower Lateral Load
Reduction in Monopile Offshore Wind Turbines,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 115894–
115910, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3325840.
[45] J. Li and H. Geng, “Platform Pitch Motion Suppression for Floating Offshore Wind
Turbine in Above-Rated Wind Speed Region,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 15, no.
3, pp. 1994–2005, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2024.3392882.
[46] “Making green energy affordable How the offshore wind energy industry matured –
and what we can learn from it.” Accessed: Dec. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available:
[Link]
affordable/executive-summary
29
[47] D. Wu et al., “Grid Integration of Offshore Wind Power: Standards, Control, Power
Quality and Transmission,” IEEE Open J. Power Electron., vol. 5, pp. 583–604, 2024, doi:
10.1109/OJPEL.2024.3390417.
[48] “mhi-vestas-unveils-9mw-giant - reNews - Renewable Energy News.” Accessed: Dec.
01, 2024. [Online]. Available: [Link]
[49] A. Gabash and P. Li, “On Variable Reverse Power Flow-Part II: An Electricity Market
Model Considering Wind Station Size and Location,” Energies, vol. 9, no. 4, Art. no. 4,
Apr. 2016, doi: 10.3390/en9040235.
[50]
“FOWIND_Report_on_Grid_Integration_for_Offshore_Wind_Farm_Development_in
_Gujarat_and_Tamil_Nadu (1).”
[51] “1/35KV XLPE Insulated Submarine Power Cable.” Accessed: Dec. 01, 2024.
[Online]. Available: [Link]
[52] H. Shao, R. Henriques, H. Morais, and E. Tedeschi, “Power quality monitoring in
electric grid integrating offshore wind energy: A review,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol.
191, p. 114094, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/[Link].2023.114094.
[53] “How can offshore wind be a nature positive climate solution? | World Economic
Forum.” Accessed: Dec. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available:
[Link]
and-contribute-to-a-nature-positive-transition/
[54] “Renewable Energy Benefits: Leveraging Local Capacity for Offshore Wind.”
Accessed: Dec. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available:
[Link]
Wind
[55] A. L. G. Pires, P. Rotella Junior, S. N. Morioka, L. C. S. Rocha, and I. Bolis, “Main
Trends and Criteria Adopted in Economic Feasibility Studies of Offshore Wind Energy: A
Systematic Literature Review,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 12, Dec. 2021, doi:
10.3390/en15010012.
[56] S. Tegen, D. Keyser, F. Flores-Espino, J. Miles, D. Zammit, and D. Loomis, “Offshore
Wind Jobs and Economic Development Impacts in the United States: Four Regional
Scenarios,” NREL/TP--5000-61315, 1171787, Feb. 2015. doi: 10.2172/1171787.
[57] M. M. Lozer dos Reis, B. Mitsuo Mazetto, and E. Costa Malateaux da Silva, “Economic
analysis for implantation of an offshore wind farm in the Brazilian coast,” Sustain. Energy
Technol. Assess., vol. 43, p. 100955, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/[Link].2020.100955.
[58] “FOWIND,” Global Wind Energy Council. Accessed: Dec. 01, 2024. [Online].
Available: [Link]
[59] “Denmark’s Largest Offshore Wind Power Procurement Procedure Launched.”
Accessed: Dec. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: [Link]
largest-offshore-wind-power-procurement-procedure-launched
[60] S. C. L. Watson et al., “The global impact of offshore wind farms on ecosystem
services,” Ocean Coast. Manag., vol. 249, p. 107023, Mar. 2024, doi:
10.1016/[Link].2024.107023.
[61] S. Adumene and H. Ikue-John, “Offshore system safety and operational challenges in
harsh Arctic operations,” J. Saf. Sci. Resil., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 153–168, Jun. 2022, doi:
10.1016/[Link].2022.02.001.
[62] P. Rajagopalan, “Challenges in grid integration of offshore wind in Tamil Nadu and
Gujarat for policy makers and transmission planners,” in 2017 7th International
Conference on Power Systems (ICPS), Dec. 2017, pp. 206–211. doi:
10.1109/ICPES.2017.8387294.
30
[63] R. Poudineh, C. Brown, and B. Foley, Economics of Offshore Wind Power: Challenges
and Policy Considerations. Springer, 2017.
31