Complex Analysis
Complex Analysis
CHAPTER 13
Complex Numbers
and Functions. Complex
Differentiation
The transition from “real calculus” to “complex calculus” starts with a discussion of
complex numbers and their geometric representation in the complex plane. We then
progress to analytic functions in Sec. 13.3. We desire functions to be analytic because
these are the “useful functions” in the sense that they are differentiable in some domain
and operations of complex analysis can be applied to them. The most important equations
are therefore the Cauchy–Riemann equations in Sec. 13.4 because they allow a test of
analyticity of such functions. Moreover, we show how the Cauchy–Riemann equations
are related to the important Laplace equation.
The remaining sections of the chapter are devoted to elementary complex functions
(exponential, trigonometric, hyperbolic, and logarithmic functions). These generalize the
familiar real functions of calculus. Detailed knowledge of them is an absolute necessity
in practical work, just as that of their real counterparts is in calculus.
Prerequisite: Elementary calculus.
References and Answers to Problems: App. 1 Part D, App. 2.
z ⫽ (x, y).
1
First to use complex numbers for this purpose was the Italian mathematician GIROLAMO CARDANO
(1501–1576), who found the formula for solving cubic equations. The term “complex number” was introduced
by CARL FRIEDRICH GAUSS (see the footnote in Sec. 5.4), who also paved the way for a general use of
complex numbers.
608
[Link] 10/30/10 2:14 PM Page 609
x ⫽ Re z, y ⫽ Im z.
By definition, two complex numbers are equal if and only if their real parts are equal
and their imaginary parts are equal.
(0, 1) is called the imaginary unit and is denoted by i,
Multiplication is defined by
(x 1, 0) ⫹ (x 2, 0) ⫽ (x 1 ⫹ x 2, 0)
and
(x 1, 0)(x 2, 0) ⫽ (x 1x 2, 0)
as for real numbers x 1, x 2. Hence the complex numbers “extend” the real numbers. We
can thus write
(4) z ⫽ x ⫹ iy
(5) i 2 ⫽ ⫺1
For multiplication the standard notation gives the following very simple recipe. Multiply
each term by each other term and use i 2 ⫽ ⫺1 when it occurs [see (3)]:
This agrees with (3). And it shows that x ⫹ iy is a more practical notation for complex
numbers than (x, y).
If you know vectors, you see that (2) is vector addition, whereas the multiplication (3)
has no counterpart in the usual vector algebra.
EXAMPLE 1 Real Part, Imaginary Part, Sum and Product of Complex Numbers
Let z 1 ⫽ 8 ⫹ 3i and z 2 ⫽ 9 ⫺ 2i. Then Re z 1 ⫽ 8, Im z 1 ⫽ 3, Re z 2 ⫽ 9, Im z 2 ⫽ ⫺2 and
z 1 ⫹ z 2 ⫽ (8 ⫹ 3i) ⫹ (9 ⫺ 2i) ⫽ 17 ⫹ i,
Subtraction, Division
Subtraction and division are defined as the inverse operations of addition and multipli-
cation, respectively. Thus the difference z ⫽ z 1 ⫺ z 2 is the complex number z for which
z 1 ⫽ z ⫹ z 2. Hence by (2),
(6) z 1 ⫺ z 2 ⫽ (x 1 ⫺ x 2) ⫹ i ( y1 ⫺ y2).
z1 x 1x 2 ⫹ y1 y2 x 2 y1 ⫺ x 1 y2
(7*) z ⫽ z ⫽ x ⫹ iy, x⫽ , y⫽ .
2 x 22 ⫹ y 22 x 22 ⫹ y 22
The practical rule used to get this is by multiplying numerator and denominator of z 1>z 2
by x 2 ⫺ iy2 and simplifying:
Complex numbers satisfy the same commutative, associative, and distributive laws as real
numbers (see the problem set).
Complex Plane
So far we discussed the algebraic manipulation of complex numbers. Consider the
geometric representation of complex numbers, which is of great practical importance. We
choose two perpendicular coordinate axes, the horizontal x-axis, called the real axis, and
the vertical y-axis, called the imaginary axis. On both axes we choose the same unit of
length (Fig. 318). This is called a Cartesian coordinate system.
(Imaginary y
axis)
y 1
P 5 x
z = x + iy
–1
1
(Real
1 x axis) –3 4 – 3i
We now plot a given complex number z ⫽ (x, y) ⫽ x ⫹ iy as the point P with coordinates
x, y. The xy-plane in which the complex numbers are represented in this way is called the
complex plane.2 Figure 319 shows an example.
Instead of saying “the point represented by z in the complex plane” we say briefly and
simply “the point z in the complex plane.” This will cause no misunderstanding.
Addition and subtraction can now be visualized as illustrated in Figs. 320 and 321.
z2
y
z1
z1 + z2
z2
x
z1– z2
z1
– z2
x
Fig. 320. Addition of complex numbers Fig. 321. Subtraction of complex numbers
2
Sometimes called the Argand diagram, after the French mathematician JEAN ROBERT ARGAND
(1768–1822), born in Geneva and later librarian in Paris. His paper on the complex plane appeared in 1806,
nine years after a similar memoir by the Norwegian mathematician CASPAR WESSEL (1745–1818), a surveyor
of the Danish Academy of Science.
[Link] 10/30/10 2:14 PM Page 612
z ⫽ x ⫺ iy.
It is obtained geometrically by reflecting the point z in the real axis. Figure 322 shows
this for z ⫽ 5 ⫹ 2i and its conjugate z ⫽ 5 ⫺ 2i.
2 z = x + iy = 5 + 2i
5 x
–2 z = x – iy = 5 – 2i
1
(8) Re z ⫽ x ⫽ 12 (z ⫹ z), Im z ⫽ y ⫽ (z ⫺ z).
2i
(z 1 ⫹ z 2) ⫽ z1 ⫹ z 2, (z 1 ⫺ z 2) ⫽ z 1 ⫺ z 2,
(9)
az b ⫽
z1 z1
(z 1z 2) ⫽ z1z 2, .
2 z2
1 3i ⫹ 3i
Im z 1 ⫽ [(4 ⫹ 3i) ⫺ (4 ⫺ 3i)] ⫽ ⫽ 3.
2i 2i
SEC. 13.2 Polar Form of Complex Numbers. Powers and Roots 613
4. Law for conjugates. Verify (9) for z 1 ⫽ ⫺11 ⫹ 10i, 8–15 COMPLEX ARITHMETIC
z 2 ⫽ ⫺1 ⫹ 4i. Let z 1 ⫽ ⫺2 ⫹ 11i, z 2 ⫽ 2 ⫺ i. Showing the details of
5. Pure imaginary number. Show that z ⫽ x ⫹ iy is your work, find, in the form x ⫹ iy:
pure imaginary if and only if z ⫽ ⫺z. 8. z 1z 2, (z 1z 2) 9. Re (z 21), (Re z 1)2
6. Multiplication. If the product of two complex numbers 2
10. Re (1>z 2), 1>Re (z 2) 2
(3) ƒ z ƒ ⫽ r ⫽ 2x 2 ⫹ y 2 ⫽ 1zz.
Geometrically, ƒ z ƒ is the distance of the point z from the origin (Fig. 323). Similarly,
ƒ z 1 ⫺ z 2 ƒ is the distance between z 1 and z 2 (Fig. 324).
u is called the argument of z and is denoted by arg z. Thus u ⫽ arg z and (Fig. 323)
y
(4) tan u ⫽ x (z ⫽ 0).
Geometrically, u is the directed angle from the positive x-axis to OP in Fig. 323. Here, as
in calculus, all angles are measured in radians and positive in the counterclockwise sense.
[Link] 10/30/10 2:14 PM Page 614
(5) ⫺p ⬍ Arg z ⬉ p.
Then we have Arg z ⫽ 0 for positive real z ⫽ x, which is practical, and Arg z ⫽ p (not
⫺p!) for negative real z, e.g., for z ⫽ ⫺4. The principal value (5) will be important in
connection with roots, the complex logarithm (Sec. 13.7), and certain integrals. Obviously,
for a given z ⫽ 0, the other values of arg z are arg z ⫽ Arg z ⫾ 2np (n ⫽ ⫾1, ⫾2, Á ).
Imaginary
axis
y
z2
y
P
z = x + iy | z1 – z
2 | z1
|
| z2
r
|=
|z
θ
Real |z 1|
O x axis x
Fig. 323. Complex plane, polar form Fig. 324. Distance between two
of a complex number points in the complex plane
䊏
2
1 CAUTION! In using (4), we must pay attention to the quadrant in which z lies, since
x
tan u has period p, so that the arguments of z and ⫺z have the same tangent. Example:
Fig. 325. Example 1
for u1 ⫽ arg (1 ⫹ i) and u2 ⫽ arg (⫺1 ⫺ i) we have tan u1 ⫽ tan u2 ⫽ 1.
Triangle Inequality
Inequalities such as x 1 ⬍ x 2 make sense for real numbers, but not in complex because there
is no natural way of ordering complex numbers. However, inequalities between absolute values
(which are real!), such as ƒ z 1 ƒ ⬍ ƒ z 2 ƒ (meaning that z 1 is closer to the origin than z 2) are of
great importance. The daily bread of the complex analyst is the triangle inequality
which we shall use quite frequently. This inequality follows by noting that the three
points 0, z 1, and z 1 ⫹ z 2 are the vertices of a triangle (Fig. 326) with sides ƒ z 1 ƒ , ƒ z 2 ƒ , and
ƒ z 1 ⫹ z 2 ƒ , and one side cannot exceed the sum of the other two sides. A formal proof is
left to the reader (Prob. 33). (The triangle degenerates if z 1 and z 2 lie on the same straight
line through the origin.)
[Link] 10/30/10 2:14 PM Page 615
SEC. 13.2 Polar Form of Complex Numbers. Powers and Roots 615
y
z1 + z2
z2
z1
(6*) ƒ z1 ⫹ z2 ⫹ Á ⫹ zn ƒ ⬉ ƒ z1 ƒ ⫹ ƒ z2 ƒ ⫹ Á ⫹ ƒ zn ƒ ;
that is, the absolute value of a sum cannot exceed the sum of the absolute values of the terms.
z 1z 2 ⫽ r1r2 [(cos u1 cos u2 ⫺ sin u1 sin u2) ⫹ i(sin u1 cos u2 ⫹ cos u1 sin u2)].
The addition rules for the sine and cosine [(6) in App. A3.1] now yield
Taking absolute values on both sides of (7), we see that the absolute value of a product
equals the product of the absolute values of the factors,
(8) ƒ z 1z 2 ƒ ⫽ ƒ z 1 ƒ ƒ z 2 ƒ .
Taking arguments in (7) shows that the argument of a product equals the sum of the
arguments of the factors,
` ` ⫽
z1 ƒ z1 ƒ
(10) (z 2 ⫽ 0).
z2 ƒ z2 ƒ
[Link] 10/30/10 2:14 PM Page 616
Similarly, arg z 1 ⫽ arg [(z 1>z 2)z 2] ⫽ arg (z 1>z 2) ⫹ arg z 2 and by subtraction of arg z 2
z1
(11) arg z ⫽ arg z 1 ⫺ arg z 2 (up to multiples of 2p).
2
z1 r1
(12) z 2 ⫽ r2 [cos (u1 ⫺ u2) ⫹ i sin (u1 ⫺ u2)].
To comprehend this formula, note that it is the polar form of a complex number of absolute
value r1>r2 and argument u1 ⫺ u2. But these are the absolute value and argument of z 1>z 2,
as we can see from (10), (11), and the polar forms of z 1 and z 2.
z1
Arg a b ⫽ ⫽ Arg z 1 ⫺ Arg z 2.
3p p
Arg (z 1z 2) ⫽ ⫺ ⫽ Arg z 1 ⫹ Arg z 2 ⫺ 2p,
z2
䊏
4 4
Similarly, (12) with z 1 ⫽ 1 and z 2 ⫽ z n gives (13) for n ⫽ ⫺1, ⫺2, Á . For ƒ z ƒ ⫽ r ⫽ 1, formula (13) becomes
De Moivre’s formula3
We can use this to express cos nu and sin nu in terms of powers of cos u and sin u. For instance, for n ⫽ 2 we
have on the left cos2 u ⫹ 2i cos u sin u ⫺ sin2 u. Taking the real and imaginary parts on both sides of (13*)
with n ⫽ 2 gives the familiar formulas
This shows that complex methods often simplify the derivation of real formulas. Try n ⫽ 3. 䊏
Roots
If z ⫽ w n (n ⫽ 1, 2, Á ), then to each value of w there corresponds one value of z. We
shall immediately see that, conversely, to a given z ⫽ 0 there correspond precisely n
distinct values of w. Each of these values is called an nth root of z, and we write
3
ABRAHAM DE MOIVRE (1667–1754), French mathematician, who pioneered the use of complex numbers
in trigonometry and also contributed to probability theory (see Sec. 24.8).
[Link] 10/30/10 2:14 PM Page 617
SEC. 13.2 Polar Form of Complex Numbers. Powers and Roots 617
n
(14) w ⫽ 1z .
n
Hence this symbol is multivalued, namely, n-valued. The n values of 1 z can be obtained
as follows. We write z and w in polar form
u ⫹ 2kp u ⫹ 2kp
1 z ⫽ 1 r acos ⫹ i sin b
n n
(15) n n
n
where k ⫽ 0, 1, Á , n ⫺ 1. These n values lie on a circle of radius 1 r with center at the
n
origin and constitute the vertices of a regular polygon of n sides. The value of 1 z obtained
by taking the principal value of arg z and k ⫽ 0 in (15) is called the principal value of
n
w ⫽ 1z.
Taking z ⫽ 1 in (15), we have ƒ z ƒ ⫽ r ⫽ 1 and Arg z ⫽ 0. Then (15) gives
n 2kp 2kp
(16) 2 1 ⫽ cos n ⫹ i sin n , k ⫽ 0, 1, Á , n ⫺ 1.
These n values are called the nth roots of unity. They lie on the circle of radius 1 and
center 0, briefly called the unit circle (and used quite frequently!). Figures 327–329 show
1 1
21 ⫽ 1, ⫺2 ⫾ 2 23i, 21 ⫽ ⫾1, ⫾i, and 21.
3 4 5
y y y
ω ω
ω
ω2
ω2
1 x 1 x 1 x
ω3
ω2 ω3 ω4
3 4 5
Fig. 327. 2 1 Fig. 328. 2 1 Fig. 329. 2 1
[Link] 10/30/10 2:14 PM Page 618
n
If v denotes the value corresponding to k ⫽ 1 in (16), then the n values of 2 1 can be
written as
1, v, v2, Á , vnⴚ1.
More generally, if w1 is any nth root of an arbitrary complex number z (⫽ 0), then the n
n
values of 1 z in (15) are