0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views1 page

AOS2 Oral Presentation Criteria Guide

stuff

Uploaded by

Callum Mahon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views1 page

AOS2 Oral Presentation Criteria Guide

stuff

Uploaded by

Callum Mahon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

UNIT 4 ENGLISH: AOS2 PRESENTING ARGUMENT POINT OF VIEW ORAL PRESENTATION

NAME: ISSUE: Plan  References 


Criteria Comment
KNOWLEDGE and IDEAS Presentation shows an accurate Presentation shows an accurate Presentation shows a Presentation shows a Presentation shows little
 Knowledge of the issue. and complex understanding of the and detailed understanding of generally accurate and superficial understanding understanding of the
 Contention. chosen issue with a contention that chosen issue with a sustained appropriate understanding of the chosen issue. issue. Contention and

Not shown
 Main points. is sustained throughout. All ideas contention. All ideas are clearly of chosen issue with a clear Contention is suggested if main ideas are unclear.
are highly relevant, clearly stated, stated and explained. contention. Most ideas are not clearly stated. Some
and thoroughly explained. clearly stated with some main ideas are clear.
explanation.

5 4 3 2 1 0
EVIDENCE and PERSUASION All arguments are supported by All arguments are supported by Most arguments are Some attempts are made Little or no evidence.
 Use of evidence. highly relevant evidence. A variety relevant evidence. Persuasive supported by appropriate to support arguments Little or no persuasive
 Use of a variety of persuasive of persuasive techniques and techniques and language evidence. Some persuasive with evidence. Some language. Weak or no
language features have been features have been purposefully techniques and language attempts are made to use visual aids are used.

Not Shown
techniques and language
features. seamlessly and purposefully used used to engage the audience. features have been clearly persuasive language. Little or no reference to
 Use of visual aids. to engage the audience. Engaging Appropriate visual aids used. Visual aids support Visual aids are used but sources is provided.
visual aids are fluently incorporated complement ideas. some ideas. not directly relevant to
 Acknowledgement of sources.
into argument. Accurate and Acknowledgement of sources is Acknowledgement of some speech. Limited
detailed acknowledgement of provided. sources is provided. acknowledgement of
sources is provided. sources is provided.
5 4 3 2 1 0
STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENT Highly effective argument which is Effective argument which is Clear argument which is Superficial argument. Little sense of argument
 Reasoning and sustainability of sustained throughout the sustained throughout the generally sustained Some arguments are and unclear ideas. Little
argument. presentation. Arguments are presentation. Arguments are throughout the presented coherently, or no rebuttal of
 presented logically and coherently, presented logically and presentation. Arguments with limited linking of opposing views is given.

Not Shown
Logical flow of argument and
linking of ideas. with fluent linking of ideas. coherently, with evident linking are mostly presented ideas. Limited rebuttal of
 Coherence and effectiveness of Opposing views are acknowledged of ideas. Opposing views are coherently, with some opposing views.
argument. and effectively and respectfully acknowledged and respectfully linking of ideas. Rebuttal of
rebutted, with a focus on the rebutted, with a focus on the opposing views is
 Rebuttal.
arguments. arguments. attempted.

5 4 3 2 1 0
ORAL LANGUAGE USE Skilful use of highly appropriate Uses appropriate oral language Uses some appropriate oral Variable use of oral Limited use of oral
 Expressive, coherent, and oral language conventions to conventions that mostly engage language conventions to language conventions to language conventions to
fluent delivery. consistently engage the audience, the audience, including fluent engage the audience, such engage the audience, engage the audience,
 Use of vocabulary. including expressive and fluent delivery; consistently use of as: attempts at fluency; such as: disrupted such as: stilted delivery;

Not Shown
 Use of voice to engage and delivery; effective and engaging use pace, pitch and pauses; some use of pace, pitch and delivery; attempts to vary little or no use of voice,
communicate. of pace, pitch and pauses; meaningful use of tone and pauses; meaningful use of voice; attempts at body language, or eye
 Use of body language, gestures, meaningful use of tone and emphasis; varied body language, tone and emphasis; body appropriate body contact; mostly reads
eye contact. emphasis; body language, gestures gestures and eye contact; some language, gestures and eye language, gestures and from notes/slides.
and eye contact are genuine and reading from notes/slides. contact attempt to engage; eye contact; mostly reads
varied; little reading from too reliant on notes/slides. from notes/slides.
notes/slides.
5 4 3 2 1 0

Assessed by: _________________________________________ Moderated by: _________________________________________

Total:
/20

You might also like