2.

1 Introduction
2.1.1 Scope and Purpose

Dawood et al. (2021) emphasizes the importance of distinguishing

between firms engaged in international markets and those limited
to domestic operations. Their findings show that exposure to
global markets shapes valuation differently than purely local
firms. This study builds on their insight by comparing Egyptian
firms across both orientations, enabling analysis of how market
positioning interacts with macroeconomic forces to influence firm
value.

A central question of this research is whether Egyptian share

prices accurately reflect intrinsic worth, or fair value. Evaluating
such alignment is essential for judging informational efficiency,
particularly in emerging economies. Building on this concern, the
study investigates valuation discrepancies to reveal whether
stock pricing driven by fundamentals or distorted by sentiment
and inefficiencies (Billmeier & Massa, 2007).

2.1.2 Core Research Focus

a. Macroeconomic Factors

The Egyptian market’s sensitivity to macroeconomic indicators is

well recognized. Inflation, GDP growth, and exchange rates exert
measurable influence on share performance, exposing firms to
systemic pressures. By integrating lag effects into the analysis,
this research extends the perspective of earlier work,
acknowledging that economic shocks rarely impact share values
instantly but instead unfold across multiple time horizons (Ayyad,
2023).

Valuation discrepancies often reflect structural inefficiencies in

Egypt’s stock market. This study systematically contrasts market
value with fair value to assess whether investor sentiment and
speculative activity overshadow fundamental firm performance.
In doing so, it directly addresses the concern that mispricing may
1 | Page
be persistent in Egypt, thereby affecting investment decisions and
economic development (Al-Wazier, 2024).

Sectoral resilience is another vital dimension. Industry-specific

conditions influence how firms respond to macroeconomic shocks,
with some sectors proving more adaptive. This study adopts such
a perspective by investigating cross-sectoral variation in Egypt,
clarifying which industries are most vulnerable to inflation, GDP
changes, or currency depreciation, and which demonstrate higher
capacity to withstand volatility (Elazhary, 2024).

b. Time-Lag Effects

The reliability of valuation methods is equally critical. Under

inflationary conditions, the Economic Value-Added (EVA)
framework often understates or overstates firm strength, leading
to misleading signals. This research acknowledges such
limitations and instead applies broader valuation models—
including FCFF and FCFE—that are more resilient under volatile
economic environments like Egypt’s (Zdeněk, 2011).

Performance measures must also fit firm context. As methods like

EVA cannot be applied, organizational characteristics strongly
shape their relevance. This study reinforces the need for adapting
valuation frameworks to Egypt’s corporate and regulatory
environment, with careful tailoring of financial metrics for credible
outcomes (H.M. van der Poll et al., 2011).

Inflation shown to directly reduce profitability and depress share

prices in Egypt. This evidence underscores the importance of
inflation as a determinant of firm value, while raising the question
of whether financial performance metrics—profitability, liquidity,
and solvency—can moderate such impacts to preserve firm
valuation (Eldomiaty et al., 2018).

Macroeconomic dynamics shaped by timing. Inflation, for

example, may initially reduce share value but later enhance it as

2 | Page
sentiment adjusts, producing delayed positive correlations. This
study integrates such insights by explicitly analyzing lag effects,
offering a clearer picture of how shocks reverberate across short-
term and long-term firm valuations (Boons et al., 2019).

Economic shocks are seldom immediate and often vary across

time horizons. This observation directly supports the approach of
investigating both short- and long-term effects of macroeconomic
factors on Egyptian firms. By emphasizing temporal variation, the
analysis deepens understanding of how valuation evolves rather
than focusing only on instantaneous responses (Antonakakis,
2016).

c. Financial Performance as Moderator

Financial resilience can cushion firms against macroeconomic

volatility. Stronger performance metrics reduce vulnerability to
inflation and currency depreciation while amplifying the benefits
of GDP growth. The current study therefore examines financial
performance as a moderator, highlighting how robust internal
health helps Egyptian firms mitigate external shocks, sustain
market, and fair valuations (Suseno, 2020).
d. Firm Valuation in Egypt

Adjustment processes in markets are rarely instantaneous. Delays

in reaction often reflect inefficiencies and behavioral frictions that
slow down responses to shocks. This supports the study’s
emphasis on lagged macroeconomic effects, recognizing that
Egyptian firms and investors often react gradually, which affects
both market and fair value assessments over time (Ahmed, 2025).
Valuation frameworks such as Free Cash Flow to Firm (FCFF) and
Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE) capture intrinsic firm value. These
models are superior to accounting-based measures, as they
incorporate expected performance and financial health. This
study employs FCFF and FCFE to evaluate fair value, enabling

3 | Page
direct comparison with observed market value in Egypt
(Mousanezhad et al., 2020).

2.1.3 Importance of Critically Examining Existing

Literature to Frame the Study’s Contribution

Critically reviewing the literature highlights gaps that this

research addresses by aligning with three key objectives.
a. Specific Conditions and Scenarios

Existing studies often neglect to distinguish between international

and domestic market orientations, despite evidence that these
contexts shape how macroeconomic shocks affect firm valuation.
By focusing on such conditions, this research provides a more
granular view of macroeconomic threats in Egypt.
b. Sector Resilience

Prior analyses rarely examine cross-sectoral resilience in detail,

overlooking how industry-specific structures moderate exposure
to inflation, currency depreciation, and GDP fluctuations. This
study fills that gap by identifying which sectors in Egypt withstand
volatility most effectively, adding a practical dimension to the
valuation debate.
c. Market Value and Fair Value Assessment

A critical gap in the literature is the lack of comparative analysis

between market value and fair value in Egypt. While studies
recognize informational inefficiencies, few systematically evaluate
whether market pricing reflects underlying fundamentals. This
research addresses this shortfall by applying FCFF and FCFE
models alongside market data to assess alignment.

4 | Page
By addressing these objectives, the study contributes a multi-
dimensional framework that integrates macroeconomic factors,
time-lagged effects, and firm-level financial performance. This
represented in Figure 1, which demonstrates how external shocks,
internal financial health, and sectoral context interact to shape
both market and fair value.

Figure 1 the schematic for research methodology for the proposed

study.

By addressing its objectives, this research seeks to provide a

comprehensive understanding of how macroeconomic factors,
sector performance, and stock value interact within the Egyptian
context. Establishing a clear grasp of the core variables—
macroeconomic conditions, market and fair value, and financial
performance—creates the foundation for examining their
interrelationships. Analyzing these elements individually before
integrating them ensures a structured approach that enhances
analytical clarity and depth. Such a framework is essential for
capturing the complexities of Egypt’s financial environment and
prepares the ground for exploring interactions, time-lag effects,
and sectoral variations that shape valuation dynamics and
investment decision-making.

5 | Page
 2.2 Theoretical Framework

This study anchor in a dual-theoretical framework that examines

how macroeconomic conditions and internal financial
performance influence stock value. By incorporating both market
value and fair value metrics, the research distinguishes between
observed investor sentiment and intrinsic firm valuation. This
comparison enables a deeper understanding of whether pricing
reflects fundamental value, offering insights into the informational
efficiency of the Egyptian stock market (Purkayastha and Filatotchev, 2023).
The theoretical foundation facilitates interpretation of firm
responses to macroeconomic shifts and performance signals. It
also guides the exploration of valuation mismatches and market
reactions, helping to characterize the type of market structure—
efficient, speculative, or sentiment-driven—prevailing in Egypt
(Khalil, 2015).
The theoretical framework anchors this study in the Efficient
Market Hypothesis (EMH) and Signaling Theory, both of which
provide insight into how stock values reflect economic information
(SARAOĞLU, 2017). Additionally, Agency Theory considered to
explain how conflicts between managers and shareholders—
arising from divergent interests and information asymmetry—can
influence financial decisions and stock valuation. In markets with
weak governance structures (Sukendri et al, 2024)
This study applies EMH, Signaling, and Agency theories to explain
valuation dynamics in Egypt’s weak-form market. EMH highlights
inefficiencies where macroeconomic shocks distort market value
from fair value, while Signaling shows how financial metrics
moderate this gap by conveying firm resilience. Agency theory
adds that governance and performance mitigate managerial
distortions under volatility. Together, these frameworks
underscore the need to correlate market value with fair value,

6 | Page
ensuring a clearer understanding of macroeconomic effects
moderated by financial performance.
2.2.1. Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH):
a. Weak vs. Semi-Strong Form in Emerging Markets

Sharma and Thaker (2015) explain that the Efficient Market

Hypothesis (EMH) asserts stock prices reflect all available
information, preventing consistent abnormal returns. They
highlight that EMH exists in weak, semi-strong, and strong forms,
which vary in the degree of informational incorporation. This
distinction provides a useful framework for assessing whether
observed prices reflect intrinsic value or distorted by
inefficiencies, particularly in emerging economies where
transparency and disclosure practices may lag developed
markets.
Yuliana et al. (2024) expand on this classification by emphasizing
that weak-form EMH reflects only past trading data, semi-strong
form integrates all publicly available information, and strong form
incorporates both public and insider data. Their findings highlight
that while mature markets may approach semi-strong or strong
efficiency, emerging markets typically remain closer to weak-form
efficiency due to gaps in governance, limited investor
sophistication, and uneven access to financial data.
Nyakurukwa and Seetharam (2023) emphasize the role of signals
under each efficiency form. In weak-form markets, signals such as
dividends or profitability disclosures may still influence investor
behavior because past data dominate price formation. In contrast,
under semi-strong efficiency, such signals absorbed instantly,
leaving no room for abnormal returns. This contrast is critical in
examining Egypt’s stock market, where signaling retains
importance given the weak incorporation of public information.
Yalçın (2010) further explores how investor rationality underlies
EMH. Weak-form assumes investors cannot profit from historical

7 | Page
patterns; semi-strong assumes rapid adjustment to public
information; and strong-form assumes even insider knowledge is
priced in. However, Egypt’s market demonstrates features of
weak efficiency, where investor behavior, market sentiment, and
delayed absorption of macroeconomic factors leave space for
discrepancies between market value and fair value. This study
leverages that gap to assess valuation accuracy.
b. Application in the Egyptian Stock Market Context

In practice, EMH provides a foundation for evaluating whether

stock prices in Egypt reflect intrinsic value or distorted by
informational frictions. Evidence suggests that Egypt’s stock
market demonstrates weak-form efficiency, where past prices
dominate and macroeconomic signals—such as inflation, GDP
growth, or currency depreciation—are not fully priced in.
This inefficiency has direct implications for the study’s objectives.
The divergence between market value and fair value becomes
particularly relevant under macroeconomic shocks, as market
prices may lag firms’ underlying performance. By incorporating
financial performance as a moderator, the study examines how
firm-specific resilience interacts with weak market efficiency,
providing insight into valuation mismatches and investor behavior
in Egypt’s evolving capital market.
2.2.2. Signaling Theory
[Link]. Weak vs. Semi-Strong Form in Emerging
Markets

Eldomiaty et al. (2024) highlight that signaling theory plays a

significant role in emerging markets, where transparency often
limited, and market participants rely heavily on managerial
actions to fill informational gaps. In such contexts, signals like
dividends or changes in capital structure become essential tools
for shaping investor perceptions. This reliance underscores the

8 | Page
limitations of semi-strong EMH in weak-form environments, where
signals continue to influence asset pricing and valuation accuracy.
Choudhury (2024) explains that signaling arises from asymmetric
information between insiders and investors, where managers use
observable financial or strategic actions—such as issuing
dividends, adjusting debt levels, or disclosing profitability trends—
to communicate hidden firm quality. In emerging markets, these
signals not absorbed instantly, as semi-strong EMH suggests, but
rather influence valuation over time. This gradual market
adjustment demonstrates why signaling retains critical
explanatory power under weak efficiency.
Puspitaningtyas (2019) further develops this by noting that
investors in such environments are not fully rational and often
depend on signals as proxies for unavailable internal information.
Because market prices in weak-form conditions lag fundamentals,
managerial actions can meaningfully alter investor sentiment.
This delayed response underscores the persistence of valuation
discrepancies between market and fair value, particularly in less
transparent economies, where signals bridge the information gap
more effectively than market pricing mechanisms.
[Link]. Application in the Egyptian Stock Market
Context

In Egypt’s asymmetric information environment, firms’ financial

performance metrics serve as signals to investors about resilience
against macroeconomic shocks. Linking to the research objective,
signaling explains how profitability, liquidity, and solvency
indicators moderate the relationship between inflation, GDP, or
currency volatility and valuation outcomes, thereby influencing
whether stock prices converge toward or deviate from fair value.
2.2.3. Agency Theory
[Link]. Conflicts between Management and
Shareholders in Weak Governance Environments

9 | Page
Yusof (2016) emphasizes that agency theory primarily examines
conflicts of interest between managers and shareholders when
managerial goals deviate from shareholder wealth maximization.
In weak governance environments, such as many emerging
markets, oversight structures are fragile, giving managers room
to manipulate profits, pursue risky strategies, or withhold critical
information. These misalignments distort valuation accuracy, with
market value potentially diverging from fair value. The Egyptian
market, characterized by limited enforcement of governance
standards, exemplifies how unchecked agency problems weaken
investor trust and amplify inefficiencies in asset pricing.
ElMosalamy and Gamal (2024) note that analyses of agency
conflicts in Egypt are further complicated by external factors.
Their study highlights that the sample period may not fully
account for concurrent political events, regime changes, or the
lagged effects of repeated currency devaluations, all of which
intensify agency challenges. In such contexts, managers may
exploit uncertainty to prioritize short-term gains, leaving long-
term shareholder interests neglected. These structural
weaknesses illustrate why agency theory is especially relevant to
understanding Egypt’s evolving market conditions.
Elgayar (2024) reinforces this by discussing how weak
governance structures and limited regulatory oversight in Egypt
exacerbate agency conflicts. Earnings manipulation, excessive
executive compensation, and opaque disclosure practices
undermine valuation reliability and hinder fair value assessment.
In a market with weak minority shareholder protections, such
practices further depress confidence and distort investor
perception of firm quality. The study suggests that enhancing
corporate governance and transparency is essential to reduce
agency costs and create conditions for market value to better
reflect fair value in Egypt.

10 | P a g e
 [Link]. Implication for Financial Decisions and Firm
Value

Elgayar (2025) suggests that the Adaptive Market Hypothesis

(AMH) may better explain investor behavior in emerging markets
like Egypt compared to the Efficient Market Hypothesis. The weak-
form efficiency of Egypt’s market allows behavioral biases, low
financial literacy, and managerial opportunism to significantly
influence stock valuation. Under agency theory, this inefficiency
enables managers to exploit information asymmetries, further
widening the gap between market value and fair value.
Addressing these limitations requires better governance and
stronger investor awareness to reduce the mispricing effects of
agency conflicts.
Abdelzaher (2020) emphasizes that weak regulatory enforcement
and limited market discipline allow speculative trading, insider
manipulation, and herd behavior to distort firm valuation. Agency
problems intensify under such conditions, as managers may
exploit lax oversight to conceal deficient performance or prioritize
personal gains. This weakens the accuracy of market pricing and
undermines fair value assessments. The study argues for policy
reforms—such as stricter monitoring, curbing insider trading, and
promoting financial literacy—to realign managerial incentives with
shareholder value and enhance Egypt’s market efficiency.
Agency theory also links directly to this study’s objective by
emphasizing how financial performance can moderate the costs
of agency conflicts. Strong liquidity, profitability, and solvency
serve as internal governance mechanisms that reduce managers’
ability to distort firm value. In Egypt’s volatile macroeconomic
context, such financial strength signals resilience, helping align
market value more closely with fair value. This underscores how
agency theory, when integrated with financial performance
measures, offers a lens to evaluating corporate decision-making
and valuation integrity under economic stress.

11 | P a g e
In my view, the dual-theoretical framework employed in this study
is essential, particularly due to the structural inefficiencies of the
Egyptian market. By leveraging both market and fair value
metrics, the study smartly assesses the actual efficiency of price
discovery mechanisms. The summarized forms of EMH—weak,
semi-strong, and strong—offer a useful lens to assess how
information absorb. Egypt’s market behavior aligns more with the
weak-form efficiency, where historical data and public disclosures
only partially affect pricing. This mismatch justifies the need for
fair value analysis to uncover whether pricing reflects investor
sentiment or intrinsic firm performance, supporting deeper
evaluations of market rationality.
Given Egypt's status as an emerging economy, Signaling Theory
presents a more realistic understanding of how market
participants interpret firm behavior. In a context where disclosure
delay or incomplete, observable managerial actions like dividend
announcements or changes in capital structure become key
indicators for investors seeking clarity. Unlike EMH’s assumption
of rational pricing, Signaling Theory accounts for the information
asymmetry and behavioral influences that dominate the Egyptian
stock market. Hence, this theoretical inclusion adds practical
depth, helping to explain how stock valuations shaped by both
internal signals and external market noise.

Concept Assumption Role of Practical Use

on Info Signaling in Egypt
Signaling Asymmetric Central (used Applicable
Theory to bridge info
12 | P a g e
 gap)
Weak-form Prices reflect Signals Partially
EMH past data only ignored applies
Semi-strong Prices reflect Signals priced
Rarely applies
EMH public info immediately
Strong-form Prices reflect Signals
Not applicable
EMH all info irrelevant
Comparative Role of Signaling and Market Efficiency in the
Egyptian Context
This table compares Signaling Theory and the different forms of
the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) in terms of their
assumptions about information, the relevance of signaling, and
their practical applicability in Egypt. It highlights how asymmetric
information makes signaling central in Egypt’s weak-form efficient
market, whereas semi-strong and strong-form EMH rarely or do
not apply due to limited transparency and informational
inefficiencies.
The proposed research investigates Egyptian market performance
by comparing market value and fair value, offering a practical test
of the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). If prices closely track
fair value, it will support semi-strong EMH; however, consistent
mismatches suggest weak-form efficiency or inefficiency.
Analyzing how quickly and accurately prices adjust to
macroeconomic changes and public disclosures provides insight
into the market’s informational efficiency. By assessing lag times
and valuation gaps, the study highlights whether Egypt’s stock
market truly reflects available economic information or driven by
noise and speculation.
Signaling Theory complements this by exploring how firm-level
financial actions—such as profitability changes or dividend
announcements—influence market perception. In Egypt’s
environment of asymmetric information, such signals often fill
gaps left by weak transparency and delayed disclosures. If these
signals cause market value to converge toward fair value, it
13 | P a g e
confirms investor reliance on managerial cues. The research,
therefore, sheds light on how investors interpret firm behavior in a
low-efficiency setting, revealing the real drivers of pricing and
providing deeper insight into behavioral patterns and sentiment
dynamics within the Egyptian stock market.
Incorporating Agency Theory enriches the analytical depth of this
study by addressing why observed market prices may diverge
from intrinsic valuations. While EMH and Signaling Theory explain
how information processed and interpreted by investors, Agency
Theory focuses on the managerial behaviors that distort that
information. In Egypt’s capital market—characterized by opaque
disclosures, limited regulatory enforcement, and frequent insider
influence—agency conflicts are not just theoretical but observable
in pricing inefficiencies. This theory helps clarify why fair value
may deviate from market value, supporting the need for a dual-
perspective valuation approach in such an environment.
Sectoral differences addressed by comparing firms focused on
domestic markets with those exposed to international markets.
Insights from the Efficient Market Hypothesis, Signaling Theory,
and Agency Theory applied to interpret deviations between
observed stock prices and intrinsic value, providing a broader
understanding of pricing behavior in low-efficiency environments
like Egypt.
2.3 Macroeconomic Determinants of Firm Value

Macroeconomic variables represent the external environment

within which firms operate and investors form valuation
expectations. In emerging markets like Egypt, where
inefficiencies, weak governance, and recurring shocks dominate,
these determinants exert amplified effects on firm value. Inflation,
GDP growth, interest rates, and currency depreciation not only
shape corporate earnings and financing conditions but also
influence investor sentiment, capital flows, and risk perception.

14 | P a g e
Understanding these macroeconomic forces is therefore central to
explaining the divergence between market value and intrinsic fair
value, particularly in contexts where pricing distortions and
volatility are structural features rather than temporary anomalies.
2.3.1 Key Macroeconomic Forces Shaping Firm Value

Pacini (2017) underscores that macroeconomic indicators such as

inflation, GDP growth, interest rates, and exchange rate
movements define the economic conditions under which firms
operate. Their role extends beyond corporate performance to
shape aggregate market behavior, as they influence investor risk
perceptions, capital flows, and overall valuation sentiment. In
Egypt, where frequent external shocks destabilize financial
systems, understanding these indicators provides context for
interpreting both firm-level and market-level valuation patterns.
This highlights why a systematic review of each macro
determinant is necessary before assessing their combined and
lagged effects on firm value.
M. Sakr et al. (2022) emphasize that macroeconomic variables
function as foundational building blocks of the business
environment. GDP expansion stimulates consumer demand,
inflation alters cost structures, and currency depreciation
reshapes competitiveness and liability burdens. These macro
forces extend beyond firm operations to influence liquidity,
profitability, and investor confidence, making them central to both
market and fair value assessments. In Egypt, where macro
volatility is structural rather than episodic, recognizing their
foundational role is crucial for anticipating valuation dynamics
across sectors and distinguishing fragile firms from resilient ones.
Macroeconomic factors—such as inflation, interest rates, GDP
growth, and currency depreciation—play a critical role in shaping
stock market behavior, particularly in emerging economies like
Egypt where markets are sensitive to external shocks. These

15 | P a g e
indicators directly influence investor sentiment, corporate
earnings, and overall market valuation. In Egypt’s structurally
inefficient and low-transparency environment, such shifts often
lead to pricing distortions and volatility. As external forces, they
define the broader environment in which firms operate and
contribute to persistent valuation discrepancies between market
and fair value. This section examines how these key indicators
impact stock market value.
Macroeconomic conditions exert a decisive influence on firm
valuation in emerging markets, particularly in Egypt where
structural inefficiencies, asymmetric information, and persistent
volatility amplify their effects. Inflation, currency depreciation,
GDP growth, and interest rates directly impact earnings, financing
costs, and investor sentiment, often with lagged effects that
unfold over different time horizons. Shamma (2024) argues that
these forces must analyze holistically, since their combined
interactions shape how firms absorb shocks and how markets
adjust perceptions. Integrating them into a unified framework
allows researchers to distinguish short-lived market fluctuations
from more fundamental shifts in intrinsic worth.
According to Aorere (2025), macroeconomic conditions in Egypt
continue to exert a decisive influence on stock market valuation,
with each variable contributing uniquely to investor sentiment
and pricing dynamics. Inflation, while projected to ease in
FY2024/2025, remains a major concern as elevated prices erode
household purchasing power and corporate margins. GDP growth,
forecast at 3.5% in FY2024/2025 and improving to 4.2% in
FY2025/2026, signals gradual recovery supported by
consumption, tourism, and Gulf-financed infrastructure projects.
By contrast, persistent currency depreciation continues to
pressure profitability and trigger capital outflows, underscoring
Egypt’s vulnerability to both domestic and global shocks.
2.3.2 Inflation

16 | P a g e
Höflmayr (2022) defines inflation as the sustained rise in prices
eroding purchasing power, a central challenge for valuation in
emerging markets. For Egyptian firms, inflation directly raises
input costs and reduces consumer demand, compressing
profitability. This weakens earnings and depresses fair value
measures such as FCFF and FCFE. High inflation also destabilizes
investor expectations, reinforcing speculation and widening the
gap between market value and intrinsic worth. Thus, inflation
represents both a financial and behavioral driver of valuation
discrepancies.
[Link] Global Perspectives on Inflationary Dynamics

Based on the insights from Sinéad Carew and Elizabeth (2025),

inflation continues to exert a complex influence on stock market
value, even in advanced economies. U.S. producer price index
(PPI) data showed no monthly change in June, yet tariff impacts
and fluctuating inventories created uncertainty. Such ambiguity
heightened volatility in inflation-sensitive sectors and shaped
central bank decisions on interest rates. These dynamics mirror
Egypt’s challenges, were inflation compounds valuation risks
under weak informational efficiency.
In Europe, inflationary pressures have been particularly severe,
with consumer prices reaching record highs in 2022, driven by
surging energy and food costs. The European Central Bank
responded by raising interest rates for the first time in over a
decade and introducing the Transmission Protection Instrument to
safeguard financial stability. These measures highlight how
persistent inflation, and geopolitical uncertainty can prompt
unconventional policy tools to mitigate valuation risks across
markets (Höflmayr, 2022).
[Link] Mechanisms Linking Inflation and Firm Performance

High and uncertain inflation raises input costs, squeezes real

margins, and depresses investment, directly weighing on firm

17 | P a g e
earnings. At the firm level, inflation uncertainty elevates risk
premia and curbs capital expenditures, delaying projects and
dampening productivity growth. Evidence from emerging markets
supports this pattern, showing weaker investment and profitability
in high-inflation episodes (Ha and So, 2024). Moreover, profit
margin adjustments are often uneven and temporary; while some
firms initially pass costs to consumers, this effect diminishes as
demand softens. Central bank analysis highlights sectoral
differences and limited cost pass-through, illustrating inflation’s
uneven but direct imprint on earnings (Farooq et al., 2023).
[Link] Evidence from Egypt

Eldomiaty et al. (2018) empirically demonstrate that rising

inflation in Egypt significantly reduces profitability and stock
prices. However, effects differ across firms: those with stronger
liquidity and profitability metrics withstand cost shocks more
effectively, underscoring the moderating role of financial
performance. Similarly, Elmoghany (2024) provides evidence that
inflation exerts both short-run and asymmetric effects on equity
performance. Using ARDL and NARDL methods, the study shows
that while inflation shocks depress returns, responses vary across
indices. For example, the EGX30 and T-bills register symmetric
negative impacts, while the HFI index reveals asymmetric
responses. These results highlight sectoral sensitivity and
heterogeneous investor behavior in Egypt.
[Link] Research Gap

Most existing studies on Egypt primarily focus on nominal returns,

emphasizing market value while overlooking intrinsic valuation
measures. A clear research gap exists in examining how inflation
affects fair value metrics—such as FCFF or FCFE—particularly
under conditions of volatility. This study seeks to address that gap
by estimating fair values and comparing them with market values
during inflationary episodes. Such an approach may reveal
whether inflation drives systematic deviations between

18 | P a g e
fundamental valuations and observed prices, providing deeper
insight into Egypt’s valuation dynamics.
2.3.3 Currency Depreciation (EGP)

Currency depreciation, defined as a decline in the domestic

currency’s value within a floating exchange rate system, directly
affects import costs and export competitiveness (Ca’ Zorzi et al.,
2007). Core economic fundamentals—such as weak GDP growth,
persistent inflation, and rising unemployment—erode investor
confidence, reducing demand for the domestic currency and
driving depreciation (Thomas, 1994). In Egypt, these
macroeconomic pressures have periodically deteriorated, creating
episodes of currency weakening that reflect not only external
shocks but also domestic imbalances.
[Link] Political and Institutional Factors

Political instability amplifies currency depreciation by increasing

perceived risk and discouraging foreign capital inflows. When
investors view a country as uncertain, capital flight accelerates,
raising depreciation and macroeconomic volatility (Maraoui et al.,
2021). In Egypt, historical periods of political uncertainty have
coincided with economic downturns, highlighting the critical role
of institutional stability in maintaining exchange rate resilience
and supporting firm-level financial performance.
[Link] Impacts on Firms and Valuation

Depreciation has a dual impact on corporate operations, shaping

both costs and revenues. Import-dependent firms are heavily
exposed, as rising input and financing costs erode profit margins
and weaken financial stability (Ca’ Zorzi et al., 2007). Conversely,
exporters benefit from improved competitiveness in global
markets, particularly when revenues are dollar-denominated
(Khalid et al., 2025). This dynamic creates an uneven playing field
across sectors, amplifying vulnerability in firms with high foreign-
currency liabilities regardless of revenue base.

19 | P a g e
For Egyptian listed firms, exchange-rate exposure demonstrates
this asymmetry clearly. Depreciation can simultaneously
compress importer profitability while boosting exporter margins,
particularly in industries with significant dollar revenues (Khalid et
al., 2025). Moreover, firms borrowing in foreign currencies at
lower costs may incentive to expand investment and hiring.
However, as Ozcan et al. (2021) caution, these gains are
conditional on limited financial frictions and the avoidance of
capital flight, making the overall valuation impact highly context
dependent.
[Link] Evidence from Emerging Markets

Studies from other emerging markets reinforce the destabilizing

effect of depreciation on equity performance. Fang and Miller
(2002) show that currency depreciation during the 1997 East
Asian fiscal crisis negatively impacted stock returns through rising
import costs and balance sheet stress. While the context differs,
the findings suggest that emerging markets, including Egypt, are
sensitive to depreciation shocks, emphasizing the need for robust
econometric analyses, such as VAR and NARDL, to capture causal
dynamics.
[Link] Sectoral and Macroeconomic Interactions

Research on Egypt’s real estate sector confirms that depreciation

reduces stock values, especially for import-dependent firms or
those with foreign-currency debt. Interest rates also moderate
these effects, producing bidirectional impacts when considered
alongside currency movements (Rady et al., 2024). These results
illustrate that depreciation’s influence cannot isolate from broader
macro-financial interactions, reinforcing the importance of
analyzing firm value under varying economic conditions.
[Link] Implications for Firm Valuation

Currency depreciation affects both market and fair value

measures. Using Tobin’s Q as a proxy, Abd El-Aziz et al. (2024)

20 | P a g e
find that exchange rate changes significantly influence firm
valuation, though Tobin’s Q may blur the distinction between
sentiment-driven market swings and intrinsic fundamentals. Post-
2016 float depreciation episodes in Egypt often inflated liabilities
and distorted asset replacement values, highlighting the need for
more robust valuation methods such as FCFF and FCFE to
accurately assess firm value.
[Link] Practical and Theoretical Significance

Understanding currency depreciation provides practical guidance

for investors and policymakers by emphasizing portfolio
diversification and initiative-taking monitoring of exchange rates.
Theoretically, integrating interest rate moderation and firm-level
exposures contributes to the limited literature on Egypt’s dynamic
exchange rate–stock price relationship, offering a more nuanced
perspective on valuation under macroeconomic volatility (Rady et
al., 2024). Expanding analyses into sectoral comparisons or panel
data could further strengthen policy recommendations and
market-wide insights.
2.3.4 GDP Growth

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) recognized as the primary indicator

of a country’s economic health, influencing corporate earnings
and stock prices (U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2015).
Economic expansion boosts consumer demand and business
profitability, raising both market and fair value. Conversely,
downturns depress revenues and investor sentiment, particularly
in consumption-driven industries. In Egypt, GDP fluctuations serve
as both a signal of long-term valuation potential and a barometer
of investor confidence, linking macroeconomic performance
directly to firm-level outcomes.
[Link] GDP and Firm Profitability

GDP growth drives firm profitability by expanding sales volumes

and enhancing operating leverage, allowing companies to spread

21 | P a g e
fixed costs across higher output (Dawid, 2024). Empirical
evidence shows that top-line expansion during economic
upswings improves profit margins and net income, thereby
strengthening market and fair valuations. Firm-level data in Egypt
confirm that revenues and utilization co-move with
macroeconomic growth, while downturns reduce earnings via
weaker demand and tighter financial conditions (Ibrahimov et al.,
2025). Sustained GDP growth provides a vital signal of demand
stability, enhancing investor confidence and reinforcing valuation
fundamentals.
[Link] Historical GDP Shocks in Egypt

Historical events—such as the 2008 monetary crisis, the 2011

revolution, and the 2016 currency float—demonstrate GDP’s
critical influence on equity markets. Declines triggered capital
flight, inflation, and currency depreciation, eroding market value,
whereas stabilization post-2016 reforms boosted GDP and
supported EGX recovery (Ayyad, 2023). This evidence
underscores how macroeconomic reforms, and transitional
dynamics can materially affect investor confidence and firm
valuations.
[Link] GDP in Modern Valuation Models

Despite its importance, some studies underemphasize GDP’s role

in valuation. Gendy et al. (2025) focus more on inflation, interest
rates, and foreign trade, overlooking GDP’s forward-looking
dimensions, such as expectations and nonlinear effects. Touny
and Abdelaziz (2025) further highlight that excluding GDP from
valuation models reduces explanatory power, as GDP growth
drives over half the variation in firm fair value. Incorporating GDP
into FCFF and FCFE models is therefore essential to capture both
earnings potential and investor sentiment accurately.
[Link] Cautionary Perspectives from Global Evidence

22 | P a g e
While GDP is a key driver, its link to stock markets is not always
stable. Fichtner and Joebges (2023) find limited evidence of a
consistent long-run relationship between GDP growth and stock
market performance across G7 economies, affected by
globalization, financialization, and speculative trading. Market
structure also matters market-based systems show stronger,
asymmetric reactions compared to bank-based systems. These
findings caution that GDP should consider alongside structural,
sectoral, and market-specific factors when assessing firm value in
emerging markets like Egypt.
[Link] Integrating GDP with Market Metrics

Excluding GDP from models risks misinterpreting relationships

between volume, turnover, and capitalization. Positive
capitalization effects may reflect broader economic expansion
rather than firm efficiency, while negative volume effects may
stem from speculative activity. Incorporating GDP as a control
variable enhances explanatory precision, anchoring models in real
economic behavior and clarifying the true drivers of valuation
gains.
2.3.5 Interest Rates

Sjövall (2023) highlights the significant role of interest rates as

monetary policy tools, particularly in inflationary environments. In
Egypt, higher rates raise borrowing costs, reduce investment, and
depress equity valuations. This transmission mechanism directly
affects firm value through the cost of capital, with interest rates
influencing WACC calculations in FCFF models. Thus, interest rate
shifts critically mediate the link between macroeconomic
conditions and fair value estimations.
Bruno et al. (2018) show that narrowing interest rate differentials
between emerging and developed economies triggers capital
outflows, weakening domestic currencies. For Egypt, such capital
flight compounds devaluation risks, raising import costs and debt

23 | P a g e
burdens. This demonstrates that interest rates not only shape
investment domestically but also influence currency stability and,
by extension, firm valuation. Their findings emphasize the
interconnected nature of macroeconomic determinants in
emerging markets.
2.3.6 Author’s opinion

Taken together, inflation, currency depreciation, GDP growth, and

interest rates exert interdependent effects on firm value in Egypt.
Inflation often fuels devaluation, which magnifies cost pressures;
high interest rates aimed at curbing inflation may suppress
investment and GDP growth. These interactions create complex
valuation dynamics where shocks rarely occur in isolation.
Moreover, the delayed and uneven absorption of these shocks—
reflecting Egypt’s weak-form efficiency—explains persistent
volatility in both market and fair values. Yet, much of the existing
literature emphasizes only market value, overlooking how intrinsic
or fair value shaped by these forces. Addressing this gap requires
analytical frameworks that extend beyond price trends and
incorporate fundamental valuation methods.
2.4 Concept of Firm Value

Understanding firm value requires distinguishing between market

value, which reflects investor sentiment and trading dynamics,
and fair value, which captures intrinsic worth based on
fundamentals. In emerging markets such as Egypt, market value
distorted by inefficiencies, speculation, and information
asymmetries. This creates persistent gaps between share prices
and fair value, undermining investment efficiency. Employing
robust valuation models—such as Free Cash Flow to Firm (FCFF),
Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE), and Economic Value Added (EVA)
—provides a clearer basis for comparison and allows a deeper
analysis of whether Egyptian market prices reflect intrinsic
fundamentals or speculative behavior.

24 | P a g e
He (2023) emphasizes that stock value represents a dual lens for
evaluating firms: market value shows how investors price
companies under current sentiment, while fair value captures
their long-term economic worth. This distinction is particularly
useful for interpreting investor behavior, as reliance on market
signals alone may misrepresent fundamentals. In Egypt, where
macroeconomic shocks and weak informational efficiency
influence pricing, applying both measures clarifies whether stock
prices converge toward or deviate from intrinsic valuation.
2.4.1 Market Value

Nissim and Penman (2008) define market value as the trading

price of a company’s shares, shaped by investor expectations,
risk perceptions, and external shocks. In efficient markets, market
value converges toward intrinsic worth, but in Egypt, weak-form
efficiency and high volatility prevent such alignment. Abd
Almegied and Sobhy (2015) highlight that Egyptian stock prices
influenced by sentiment, political events, and liquidity cycles,
creating short-term distortions. This undermines reliability for
long-term valuation and highlights why fair value comparisons are
critical in emerging market research.
2.4.2 Fair Value

Fair value reflects the intrinsic worth of a company, independent

of speculative swings, by discounting expected future cash flows
or measuring economic profit. By focusing on fundamentals, it
provides a benchmark for assessing whether market prices
accurately capture firm performance. Mousanezhad et al. (2020)
emphasize that fair value is especially relevant in volatile and
inefficient markets, where investors cannot rely solely on trading
data. In Egypt, comparing fair value with market value reveals
persistent mispricing, offering insight into how macroeconomic
shocks and investor behavior shape valuation discrepancies.
2.4.3 Valuation Models Used

25 | P a g e
Valuation models are essential tools in financial analysis that help
estimate the value of assets and companies. They provide
insights into whether a stock overvalued, undervalued, or fairly
valued, aiding investors in making informed decisions. Common
valuation models include the Dividend Discount Model (DDM),
which values a stock based on future dividend payments
discounted to the present, and the Comparable Valuation Model,
which compares valuation multiples of similar companies. These
models are particularly valuable in emerging markets like Egypt,
where economic volatility and diverse capital structures
necessitate robust valuation frameworks (Abuamsha, 2021).
[Link] FCFF (Free Cash Flow to Firm).

Free Cash Flow to Firm (FCFF) represents the cash generated by a

company that is available to all capital providers before
accounting for debt payments (Brealey, Myers, & Allen, 2020).
This capital-structure-neutral perspective ensures that valuation
not distorted by differences in leverage, making FCFF particularly
effective for comparing firms with heterogeneous capital
structures in emerging markets such as Egypt (Miranda, 2024).
Integration with Discounting Frameworks

FCFF aligns naturally with the Weighted Average Cost of Capital

(WACC), providing a consistent and coherent discounting
framework (Vrbka & Vitková, 2021). By linking operational cash
flows to the blended cost of financing, the model allows analysts
to assess intrinsic firm value without the distortions caused by
financing decisions, refinancing cycles, or temporary leverage
fluctuations.

Application in Cyclical and High-Leverage Industries

While FCFF widely used, its reliability depends on accurate

forecasts of capital expenditures and working capital
requirements (Damodaran, 2012). In cyclical industries—common
26 | P a g e
in Egypt, such as construction and energy—temporary surges in
cash flow can overstate firm value if reinvestment needs
underestimated (Koller et al., 2020). Conversely, in highly
leveraged environments, FCFF isolates operational performance
from financing noise, providing a clearer assessment of business
fundamentals (Berk et al., 2019).
Relevance to Emerging Markets

In emerging markets like Egypt, where firms often experience

volatile debt levels and heterogeneous financing structures,
FCFF’s focus on cash generated prior to debt servicing enhances
valuation robustness (Miranda, 2024). By emphasizing operational
cash generation, FCFF serves as a stable benchmark for cross-
industry comparison and investor decision-making, offering a
reliable measure of intrinsic firm value despite economic or
financial fluctuations.
[Link] FCFE (Free Cash Flow to Equity).

Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE) represents the residual cash

available to shareholders after accounting for expenses, taxes,
interest, and debt obligations (Damodaran, 2012). Unlike
accounting profits, FCFE directly measures shareholder value
creation, providing a clearer picture of the cash that can distribute
or reinvested. This makes it particularly relevant for capital-
intensive industries, where accrual earnings may obscure the true
cash position (Alawneh & Daraghma, 2020).
Practical Applications and Signaling Value

FCFE serves as a key indicator of financial resilience and

shareholder value. Companies consistently generating substantial
FCFE can finance growth initiatives internally while returning
capital to shareholders through buybacks or dividends, reinforcing
investor confidence (Apple, 2023). In emerging markets like
Egypt, where external financing is costly or volatile, FCFE provides
a clear signal of operational and financial stability.

27 | P a g e
Limitations and Volatility Considerations

Despite its advantages, FCFE is sensitive to leverage and short-

term capital fluctuations. Negative or highly volatile FCFE may
reflect financial strain or aggressive reinvestment strategies,
complicating sustainability assessments (European Central Bank,
2022). Moreover, differences in industry capital intensity,
financing structures, and reinvestment needs can reduce
comparability across sectors, necessitating complementary
measures such as profitability and solvency indicators for
accurate valuation (Victoria et al., 2012).
Contextual Use in Emerging Markets

The choice between FCFF and FCFE depends on the firm’s capital
structure and valuation context. FCFE is preferable for firms with
stable financing where equity-specific value prioritize, while FCFF
is more suitable in high-leverage or volatile debt environments
(Penman, 2013). In Egypt, where firms often shift between debt-
heavy and equity-focused financing, selecting the appropriate
measure ensures that valuations reflect true financial
performance rather than capital structure distortions.
[Link] EVA (Economic Value Added).

Economic Value Added (EVA) is a value-based management

metric that emphasizes economic profit rather than traditional
accounting earnings. It defines as net operating profit after tax
minus the cost of capital, a concept first formalized by Stewart
(1991, cited in Fabozzi, 2004). Unlike conventional measures, EVA
directly incorporates the cost of capital, making it a more rigorous
tool for assessing financial performance.
By adjusting for capital costs, EVA identifies whether firms
genuinely generate value for shareholders. This metric minimizes
distortions from leverage effects or accounting practices, offering
a clearer and more consistent picture of economic performance
(Sabol & Sverer, 2017). Furthermore, Fernández (2019)

28 | P a g e
emphasizes EVA’s role in bridging the gap between reported
profits and shareholder value creation, positioning it as a critical
tool for managers and investors seeking to evaluate long-term
performance.
Applications and Advantages

EVA is particularly useful for evaluating capital efficiency and

profitability, making it an effective complement to FCFF and FCFE
in markets prone to accounting distortions, such as Egypt (Sabol
& Sverer, 2017). By focusing on net operating profit after tax
minus the cost of capital, it provides a stronger indication of
whether firms are creating or eroding value in environments
where traditional measures can be misleading.
Moreover, EVA helps mitigate earnings manipulation by
concentrating on true economic profit, thus improving the
reliability of performance assessments (Liu & Wang, 2017).
Empirical evidence further supports its strength: Mostafa (2021)
found that EVA outperforms other indicators such as revenue,
EBITDA, ROE, and EPS in reflecting genuine value creation,
underlining its relevance in guiding strategic decision-making and
operational evaluation.
Limitations and Considerations

Despite its advantages, EVA has limitations. Its reliance on

accounting adjustments—such as capitalizing R&D—introduces
subjectivity and complicates cross-firm comparisons, particularly
in markets with uneven disclosure practices (Zenzerović, 2023).
Furthermore, in high-growth firms, large investments and
associated cash outflows can temporarily distort EVA, requiring
complementary evaluation methods, including fair value
assessments, to accurately capture performance and guide
investment decisions (Tortella & Brusco, 2003).
Relevance in Emerging Markets

29 | P a g e
In Egypt, EVA offers investors and managers a robust framework
for assessing firm value by integrating both profitability and
capital efficiency. When used alongside FCFF and FCFE, it provides
a comprehensive perspective that accommodates the country’s
financial and reporting volatility, ensuring more reliable valuation
and performance insights.
[Link] Author’s Perspective on Valuation Models.

Comparative Overview of Valuation Methods

This study evaluates three primary valuation methods: FCFF,

FCFE, and EVA, each offering distinct advantages. FCFF provides a
capital-structure-neutral assessment of firm value, capturing cash
generated by operations before debt obligations. FCFE, in
contrast, focuses on cash available to equity holders, offering a
shareholder-centric view of financial performance. Both methods
are rooted in the discounted cash flow (DCF) framework and are
effective for assessing long-term financial health if reinvestment
needs and financing assumptions forecasted.
Role of EVA in Performance Assessment

EVA measures economic profit by deducting the cost of capital

from operating earnings. It is particularly useful for evaluating
value creation in mature firms and for analyzing the efficiency of
capital utilization. However, in high-growth companies, negative
EVA may result from strategic investments rather than deficient
performance. Additionally, accounting adjustments, such as R&D
capitalization, can reduce cross-firm comparability, making EVA
more suitable as a supplementary tool rather than a standalone
measure.
Preferred Models for Long-Term Valuation

Given the study’s focus on long-term firm valuation, FCFF and

FCFE prioritize their stability and alignment with cash flow-based
principles. FCFF is especially relevant for firms with high leverage
or undergoing acquisitions, while FCFE is more suitable for low-

30 | P a g e
debt firms where equity cash flows are the primary concern. EVA
can complement these analyses by providing insight into interim
value creation and capital efficiency in firms with stable
structures.

Table 2.1 Comparison of Valuation Models

Mode Applicability in
Definition Strengths Limitations
l Egypt

Effective for firms

Cash Capital-structure Forecasting
with high leverage
available to neutral; CapEx and
and acquisitions;
FCFF all investors compatible with working capital is
suitable for Egypt’s
before debt WACC; useful for difficult; cyclical
capital-intensive
service leveraged firms sensitivity
sectors

Residual cash Directly

Useful for
to equity measures Highly sensitive
evaluating equity
after shareholder to debt changes;
FCFE returns but distorted
expenses, value; reflects volatile under
by debt surges
interest, and dividend and financing shifts
common in Egypt
debt buyback capacity

EVA Economic Focuses on true Requires Resolute for mature

profit after economic profit; subjective Egyptian firms with
deducting discourages accounting stable capital
cost of earnings adjustments; structures, less

31 | P a g e
Mode Applicability in
Definition Strengths Limitations
l Egypt

limited useful for high-

capital manipulation
comparability growth companies

2.5 Financial Performance as a Moderating Factor

Macroeconomic shocks alone do not determine firm value; a

company’s internal financial health shapes how such shocks
absorbed or amplified. Profitability, liquidity, and solvency serve
as buffers that influence whether firms can sustain operations
under inflation, currency depreciation, or high interest rates. Kuttu
(2024) emphasizes that these performance metrics not only
signal a firm’s ability to meet obligations but also its capacity to
seize opportunities in favorable conditions. In Egypt, where
volatility and external risks are persistent, financial indicators help
investors distinguish resilient firms from vulnerable ones, thereby
moderating the impact of external shocks on both market and fair
value.
Fitri and Pramono (2023) highlight the moderating role of financial
performance in shaping how macroeconomic variables—such as
inflation, exchange rates, and interest rates—affect stock returns.
Their study shows that firms with stronger profitability, liquidity,
and operational efficiency are less sensitive to external shocks,
while weaker firms experience amplified volatility. Metrics such as
return on assets (ROA) and liquidity ratios function as buffers,
absorbing part of the negative impact of economic downturns.
These findings reinforce the importance of incorporating multi-
dimensional financial indicators, including Z-scores, into valuation
studies. For Egypt, this perspective is particularly relevant, as
internal financial health can significantly influence how firms
navigate persistent currency depreciation and inflationary
pressures.
2.5.1 Profitability

32 | P a g e
A company’s ability to efficiently generate earnings relative to its
revenue, assets, or equity. It reveals how well a firm converts
resources into net income, reflecting both operational
performance and financial sustainability. This measure is crucial
for assessing long-term value and investment potential.
Profitability evaluates using financial ratios that offer insight into a
firm's efficiency and competitive strength (Pangesti and Siddiq,
2023).
[Link] Profitability Ratios as Measurement Tools

Gross profit margin reflects production efficiency, particularly

important in manufacturing sectors were maintaining minimum
thresholds signals competitiveness and long-term sustainability
(Gulo & Sembiring, 2024). At the same time, studies show that
variations in gross margin can highlight sectoral strengths and
weaknesses, making it a vital indicator for cross-firm comparisons
(ZHANG, 2024).
Operating margin provides insight into cost efficiency after
accounting for operating expenses, allowing firms to benchmark
performance beyond top-line revenue (Park, 2017). By linking
operational efficiency to profitability, operating margin serves as
a reliable measure of managerial effectiveness and cost-control
strategies (Harrington et al., 2022).
Net profit margin captures a company’s overall profitability by
incorporating all expenses, from operations to financing, and
reflects its capacity to deliver shareholder value (SAMSUNG
Business Report, 2023). In emerging markets, where volatility is
high, a strong net margin indicates resilience and efficiency in
managing both operational and macroeconomic pressures
(Jayathilaka, 2020).
[Link] Capital Efficiency and Shareholder-Focused Metrics

Return on assets (ROA) is a widely used metric for capital

efficiency, showing how effectively firms convert total resources

33 | P a g e
into earnings. A higher ROA reflects strong asset utilization and
sustainable performance, particularly in competitive industries.
Nurpratiwi et al. (2022) highlight ROA’s role in assessing
operational efficiency across sectors, while Supriyadi & Terbuka
(2021) emphasize its value in comparing firms with different asset
bases, making it a central tool for evaluating long-term
profitability and management effectiveness.
Return on invested capital (ROIC) isolates the returns generated
from operational investments, excluding the impact of non-
operating assets. This ensures the focus remains on value
creation from a firm’s core business activities. Mauboussin (2022)
notes that ROIC is particularly effective in distinguishing firms
with strong reinvestment strategies, while Murtala et al. (2018)
argue that it offers sharper insights in capital-intensive industries,
where efficiency in employing long-term funds determines
competitive advantage and overall shareholder value creation.
From an ownership perspective, return on equity (ROE) evaluates
the profitability earned on shareholders invested capital,
providing a direct benchmark for investor returns. Sinurat et al.
(2025) emphasize ROE’s importance for gauging investor
confidence in volatile markets. Meanwhile, Werner & Jarvis (2025)
highlight return on common equity (ROCE) as a refinement,
narrowing attention to the value generated for common
shareholders after accounting for preferred dividends. Together,
these ratios provide a comprehensive view of equity-focused
performance and capital efficiency.
[Link] Profitability as a Strategic Buffer

Profitability, measured through return on invested capital (ROIC)

and net margins, enhances firms’ resilience to inflation, interest
rate shocks, and currency depreciation. Profitable companies
maintain investment, service debt, and deliver returns during
downturns, stabilizing both market and fair value (Pervan & Visic,
2012). In Egypt, profitability also acts as a signaling tool,
34 | P a g e
conveying managerial efficiency and long-term sustainability to
investors (Al-Jafari & Al Samman, 2015).
[Link] Profitability under Macroeconomic Shocks

High earnings quality reduces the negative influence of inflation

on firm value, enabling companies to sustain operations and
investor confidence (Isma et al., 2023). Profitability further
strengthens the relationship between GDP growth and valuation,
as strong margins enhance access to capital and capture
expansionary opportunities (Gunardi et al., 2024). Together, these
findings establish profitability as both a stabilizer in downturns
and an amplifier of growth effects.
[Link] Profitability and Exchange Rate Volatility

Strong profitability provides firms with a financial cushion to

absorb depreciation-driven cost increases, sustaining fair value
even under volatile exchange rates. Companies with foreign-
denominated revenues may partially offset local currency
weakness, protecting shareholder value (Hussain et al., 2024).
This moderating role is particularly important in Egypt’s highly
exposed, import-dependent economy, where currency shocks
frequently erode margins (Pazarceviren et al., 2015).
[Link] Research Gaps and Future Directions

Despite its significant role, profitability research remains limited in

its integration with valuation models. K. & T. Laitinen (2018) note
that most studies emphasize accounting performance rather than
discounted cash flow (DCF)-based measures such as FCFF or
FCFE. Direct testing of profitability’s moderating effect on
inflation, GDP cycles, or currency shocks through intrinsic
valuation remains rare. As Santoso & Nurhidayati (2022) suggest,
future work should apply cash flow–based approaches to clarify
how profitability shields firm fair value in emerging markets.
2.5.2 Liquidity

35 | P a g e
firm’s ability to convert short-term assets into cash in a timely
manner to meet obligations as they fall due. It is a key indicator of
financial health and working capital efficiency, helping firms
sustain operations and manage short-term obligations without
distress (Nam and Tuyen, 2024).
[Link] Liquidity Ratios in Practice

Liquidity assessed using three core ratios, each providing a

different dimension of short-term solvency. The current ratio
measures the ability to cover liabilities with current assets, but
Halim (2024) highlights that acceptable benchmarks differ
significantly across industries. To refine this, the quick ratio
excludes inventory, as emphasized by Aniyah et al. (2020),
acknowledging that stock may be harder to liquidate during
periods of financial stress.
The most conservative perspective comes from the cash ratio,
which considers only cash and cash equivalents, as discussed by
Pazarceviren et al. (2015). When applied collectively, these ratios
provide a layered understanding of liquidity by balancing
flexibility, conservatism, and asset composition. However,
effective interpretation requires careful attention to sectoral
context and macroeconomic conditions since resilience can vary
widely across industries and economic cycles.
[Link] Streamlined Financial Metrics

Maurer (2025) suggests simplifying financial performance

indicators to enhance clarity. For liquidity, the quick ratio
preferred over the current and cash ratios, offering a balanced yet
rigorous measure of short-term solvency. For profitability, net
profit margin and ROIC provide comprehensive insights by
capturing overall efficiency and excluding distortions from
leverage or non-operating assets. These streamlined metrics
improve comparability and effectiveness in valuation models.
[Link] Liquidity as a Foundation of Stability

36 | P a g e
Liquidity ratios provide a critical measure of a firm’s ability to
meet short-term obligations, reflecting working capital
management efficiency. Sulastri et al. (2024) highlight that
indicators such as the current and quick ratios reveal a firm’s
ability to sustain operations under stress, while Zygala and
Włodarczyk (2021) emphasize their importance in maintaining
cash flow without costly borrowing. In Egypt’s volatile financing
environment, liquidity buffers stabilize fair value and strengthen
investor confidence.
[Link] Interaction with Profitability and Inflation

Liquidity does not act in isolation but amplifies profitability’s

impact on valuation. Al-Tamimi (2010) notes that profitable firms
may still face distress if illiquid, while Michelle and Chusnah
(2023) show that liquidity buffers firms against inflationary
shocks. In Egypt, where depreciation raises import costs and
inflation compresses margins, liquidity enables firms to maintain
solvency and reduce reliance on debt. This dual role highlights
liquidity’s moderating function in both profitability and inflation
contexts.
[Link] Liquidity and Economic Growth Cycles

Firms with strong liquidity can capitalize on expansion or buffer

against contractions. Nowicki et al. (2024) note that during
downturns, liquidity sustains operations and avoids distress sales,
while in periods of growth, it allows rapid investment responses.
In Egypt, where GDP fluctuations are frequent, liquidity provides
resilience, stabilizing both market and fair value. Despite this,
limited studies directly evaluate liquidity–GDP interactions in
valuation models, presenting a key research gap for emerging
markets.
[Link] Liquidity under Currency Depreciation

During currency shocks, liquidity helps firms manage rising import

costs and service foreign-denominated liabilities. Coppola et al.

37 | P a g e
(2023) observe that liquid firms in emerging markets access
dominant currency markets, such as USD debt pools, to reduce
refinancing risks. In Egypt, where exchange rate instability raises
working capital needs, liquidity reserves mitigate valuation losses
by maintaining continuity and enabling hedging strategies.
2.5.3 Solvency and Z-Score Models

Z-score models are statistical tools that assess a company's

financial health and bankruptcy risk by combining multiple
financial ratios into a single predictive score. Three prominent
variations of Z-score analysis—Altman Z-Score, Kida Z-Score, and
Sherrod Z-Score—developed to address different industries and
market contexts. This section discusses their formulations,
applications, and comparative strengths (Medjoub and Houas,
2020).
[Link] Altman (1968)

Developed a widely used bankruptcy prediction model that

combines five financial ratios to assess a company's financial
health. Originally designed for manufacturing firms, it evaluates
liquidity, profitability, leverage, and efficiency, classifying firms
into safe, grey, or distress zones based on their score. While
highly effective for public manufacturing companies, its reliance
on market value and fixed weightings limits its accuracy for
private firms and non-manufacturing sectors. (Elewa, 2022).
[Link] Kida Z-Score

Modifies Altman’s model by adjusting coefficients or substituting

variables to better fit different industries and economic
environments. This adaptation is particularly useful for service-
based or privately held companies, where traditional financial
metrics may not apply. However, since the model requires
recalibration for each sector, its results are less standardized than
the original Altman Z-score, making cross-industry comparisons
challenging (Babela and Renas Mohammed, 2016).
38 | P a g e
 [Link] Sherrod Z-Score

Tailored for emerging markets like Egypt, where financial

conditions differ from developed economies. It adjusts weightings
to account for higher leverage tolerance, currency volatility, and
local regulatory frameworks. This version improves bankruptcy
prediction accuracy in regions with informal financing practices
but remains region-specific, limiting its broader applicability
(Babela and Renas Mohammed, 2016).
[Link] Role of Financial Performance as a Moderator

Financial performance serves as a key internal moderator that

shapes how macroeconomic factors influence firm value. Strong
liquidity, profitability, and high Z-scores—such as those calculated
by Altman, Kida, or Sherrod—signal financial stability and lower
default risk. These firms equipped to withstand inflation, currency
depreciation, or GDP volatility, thereby sustaining investor
confidence and maintaining fair valuation. In contrast, weak Z-
scores indicate distress, leaving firms highly exposed to
macroeconomic pressures.
[Link] Complementary Dimensions of Financial Health

Profitability enhances resilience by generating earnings capacity,

liquidity provides short-term solvency, and solvency indicators
such as the Z-score ensure long-term sustainability. In Egypt’s
volatile environment, these metrics function as signals of financial
strength, reducing the gap between market and fair value.
However, excessive reliance on multiple correlated ratios risks
introducing multicollinearity, complicating empirical models.
Focusing on distinct, representative indicators allows a more
accurate assessment of firm-level resilience without redundancy.
[Link] Evidence from Composite Indicators

39 | P a g e
The Altman Emerging Market Z-score widely used to capture
vulnerabilities under exchange rate shocks and GDP volatility.
Jiang and Sedik (2019) demonstrate that firms with strong Z-
scores mitigate refinancing risks during downturns, while weaker
firms—especially those with high foreign-currency leverage—
experience amplified depreciation shocks. Such evidence
supports the role of composite financial health indicators as
buffers, though direct testing of Z-score interactions with
valuation outcomes such as discounted cash flow (DCF) or Tobin’s
Q remains scarce.
[Link] Research Gaps and Future Directions

Despite its relevance, little research integrates Z-score

frameworks into intrinsic valuation models. No study explicitly
evaluates how Z-scores moderate GDP, inflation, or exchange rate
effects on firm fair value using DCF or Tobin’s Q. Addressing this
gap requires adapting macro–finance approaches, such as the
IMF’s interaction-term models, to assess Z-score ×
macroeconomic variable effects on valuation. Future work should
clarify how financial resilience shields firms from macroeconomic
shocks, particularly in emerging markets where volatility is
systemic.
2.6 Time-Lag Effects in Economic–Market Dynamics

Madurapperuma (2022) defines a time lag as the delay between

macroeconomic shocks and their full transmission to earnings,
investor sentiment, and prices. Such lags arise from rigid
contracts, disclosure delays, financing cycles, and behavioral
adjustment. In emerging markets like Egypt, weaker institutions
and slower reporting extend these delays. Ignoring time lags risks
mismeasuring exposure and mis-specifying policy responses,
resulting in biased valuation outcomes and misleading forecasts.
2.6.1 Empirical Evidence from Inflation Dynamics

40 | P a g e
Elmahgop and Sayed (2020) show that inflation negatively affects
Sudan’s stock market in both short and long horizons using ARDL,
highlighting persistence across periods. Similarly, Elmoghany
(2024) finds that inflation in Egypt produces asymmetric effects:
short-run shocks depress indices, while longer-term adjustments
emerge through repricing and policy actions. These findings
emphasize that inflation impacts are horizon-dependent, sector-
specific, and must reflecte in valuation models like FCFF and FCFE
through phased macroeconomic scenarios rather than single-
period assumptions.

2.6.2 2.6.2 GDP Lags

Mauro (2000) demonstrates that GDP effects on stock markets

delay and vary depending on institutional structures and data
frequency. Annual measures may mask intra-year fluctuations,
while cross-country pooling risks overlooking country-specific lag
patterns. For Egypt, this implies that quarterly or monthly GDP
indicators—and models that allow heterogeneous lag structures—
are necessary to capture the timing of earnings responses and
investor revaluation within fair-value models such as FCFF and
FCFE.

2.6.3 2.6.3 Exchange Rate Lags

Javangwe and Takawira (2022) find that currency depreciation in

South Africa creates asymmetric lag effects: exporters initially
benefit, while indebted firms suffer balance-sheet deterioration.
Similarly, Helmy (2024) shows that in Egypt, depreciation has
prolonged and stronger impacts than appreciation, with sectoral
timing differences shaping market performance. These insights
highlight the need for Egyptian valuation models to incorporate
phased cash-flow impacts from currency shocks, recognizing that
exchange rate dynamics exert heterogeneous and time-
dependent influences on firm value.

41 | P a g e
 2.6.4 Moderating Role of Financial Performance

Evidence on how financial performance moderates lagged

macroeconomic effects remains limited. Liquidity is particularly
important, as it cushions depreciation shocks by providing
operational flexibility and ensuring firms can continue meeting
short-term obligations. Guerron and Jinnai (2022) emphasize that
strong liquidity positions allow companies to adapt more
effectively to external volatility, reducing the risk of immediate
financial distress.
Profitability also strengthens resilience by sustaining earnings
capacity during adverse conditions. Pratama and Akhmadi (2024)
show that in Indonesia, higher profitability enhances firms’ ability
to absorb shocks, supporting valuation stability. However, Tantawy
and Abdel-Aziz (2024) confirm the negative effects of currency
depreciation in Egypt but overlook profitability is buffering role,
leaving a gap in understanding how financial strength moderates
these shocks locally.
Solvency metrics, particularly Z-scores, provide another lens for
understanding these dynamics. Jiang and Sedik (2019) emphasize
that Z-scores capture vulnerabilities tied to solvency and foreign-
currency exposure, offering potential to mitigate lagged GDP and
exchange rate shocks. However, applications linking Z-scores to
intrinsic valuation methods remain absent, underscoring the need
for research that integrates liquidity, profitability, and solvency
into fair value frameworks for volatile markets like Egypt.
2.6.5 Methodological Approaches

Lag analysis relies heavily on ARDL, NARDL, VAR, and Granger

causality. ARDL/NARDL manage small samples and asymmetric
adjustments, while VARs capture dynamic interactions across
variables. For fair-value research, combining these with scenario-
based DCF projections allows translation of shocks into phased
cash-flow impacts. This integration ensures valuation models

42 | P a g e
account for dynamic macroeconomic effects, improving risk
assessment and forecasting accuracy.
2.6.6 Research Gaps and Implications

Globally, most lag-focused research targets stock returns, rarely

intrinsic fair value from FCFF, FCFE, or EVA. Studies in Egypt
similarly overlook how delayed inflation, GDP, or depreciation
shocks affect fundamental valuations. No evidence directly
evaluates Z-score, liquidity, or profitability as moderators in fair-
value contexts. Addressing this gap can align Egyptian valuation
studies with Adaptive Market Hypothesis perspectives, improve
forecasting reliability, and yield more policy-relevant insights for
investors.
2.7 Sectoral and Market Orientation Variations

Sectoral dynamics and market orientation significantly shape how

firms in Egypt respond to macroeconomic shocks. Industries differ
in cost structures, revenue sources, and foreign exposure, while
firms’ geographic focus—domestic vs. international—further
moderates valuation outcomes. By reviewing sectoral evidence,
this section shows that aggregate analyses risk oversimplification,
as Egypt’s stock market exhibits heterogeneous responses across
industries and firm types.
2.7.1 Sectoral Sensitivity

Macroeconomic shocks influence Egyptian sectors in markedly

separate ways. El-Masry and El-Fouly (2018) show that the real
estate sector is particularly vulnerable to exchange rate
depreciation and interest rate hikes, largely because of its
reliance on imported inputs and credit financing. By contrast,
energy and telecom sectors demonstrate relative resilience,
supported by foreign revenue streams and hedging mechanisms.
Aly et al. (2010) further illustrate that manufacturing industries
react heterogeneously to inflation and GDP growth. Consumer

43 | P a g e
goods producers tend to benefit from GDP expansion, while
capital-intensive industries face heightened exposure to rising
interest rates and currency volatility. Complementing this, Rady et
al. (2024) confirms that depreciation exerts long-term negative
effects on real estate but provides gains for exporters such as
fertilizers and textiles, underscoring the need for sector-specific
valuation approaches.
2.7.2 Domestic vs. International Orientation

Market orientation also moderates responses to shocks. Elsayed

and El-Masry (2019) find internationally diversified firms
outperform domestically focused peers under currency
depreciation, as exporters gain revenue advantages while local
firms face higher costs. Post-2016 float, exporters thrived while
import-heavy sectors such as real estate and automotive
struggled. Abdallah and El-Shamy (2021) add that multinational
firms enjoy greater valuation stability by accessing foreign
financing and operating in stronger informational environments,
while domestic firms remain more exposed to Egypt’s weak-form
market efficiency.

2.7.3 Behavioral and Regulatory Differences

Regulatory and institutional frameworks further shape outcomes.

Elgayar (2024) notes that domestic firms in heavily regulated
sectors such as banking and utilities face rigid oversight, limiting
adaptability during shocks. In contrast, internationally exposed
firms often operate under more liberal regimes abroad, reinforcing
their resilience. These structural and regulatory asymmetries
deepen valuation divergence across sectors and orientations.
2.7.4 Synthesis

44 | P a g e
Sectoral and orientation-based variations reveal that
macroeconomic shocks in Egypt unevenly distributed. Real estate,
manufacturing, and domestic-focused firms remain highly
exposed to inflation, depreciation, and interest rate hikes, while
exporters and internationally diversified firms benefit from foreign
revenues and hedging mechanisms. For this study, sectoral and
market orientation distinctions integrated into empirical models,
ensuring that lagged macroeconomic impacts on both fair and
market values evaluated across Egypt’s diverse industrial
landscape.
References

1) Abd Almegeid, N.S. (2015) Impact of value relevance of financial

performance information and corporate governance of capital structure:
Evidence from Egyptian manufacturing firms. Ain Shams University -
Faculty of Commerce - Department of Accounting and Auditing, 19(1),
pp.73–108.
2) Abdelzaher, M.A. (2021) Study the efficiency hypothesis in the Egyptian
stock market. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues,
11(1), pp. 18-25.
3) Abuamsha, M.K. (2021) Valuation methods in emerging financial markets:
literature review study. Academy of Strategic Management Journal,
20(S6).
4) Ahmed, M.S., Youssef, A. and Mahrous, M.S. (2022) Measuring stock
returns after controlling inflation effect and foreign currency fluctuations:
evidence from Egypt. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies
Journal, 25(7), pp.1-12.
5) Ahmed, W.M.A. (2025) US clean energy stocks and macroeconomic
fundamentals: A quantile-on-quantile connectedness approach. Journal of
Sustainable Finance and Accounting, 7, 100024.
6) Ahmed Elgayar (2024) Investor loss aversion and stock market
performance: An empirical study on the Egyptian stock
market. Contemporary Business Studies Group, Faculty of Commerce -
Kafr El-Sheikh University, 10(18), pp.1-25.
7) Ahmed Hassan Elgayar (2025) Efficiency puzzle of stock and mutual fund
markets (A comprehensive evaluation of the weak form in
Egypt). Scientific Journal for Financial and Commercial Studies and
Research (SJFCSR), 6(2), pp.1-25.
8) Ahmed Rady, Farah Essam, Habiba Yahia, and Maram Shalaby (2024) The
dynamic relationship between exchange rate volatility and stock prices in
the Egyptian real estate market and the moderating effect of interest
rates. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 9(5).

45 | P a g e
9) Ahmed Sayed Tokhy Abd El-Aziz, Monzer Mohamed Ali Mohamed and
Mahmoud Mohamed Hassaneen Ahmed (2024) The impact of foreign
currency exchange rate changes on firm value (An applied study on
companies listed on the Egyptian Stock Exchange). Scientific Journal of
Financial and Administrative Studies and Research, 16(Special Issue),
pp.409-436.
10) Alawneh, R. and Daraghma, Z. (2020) Competing indicators of free
cash flows and the usefulness: Evidence from Palestine
Exchange. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 24(3).
11) Altman, E.I. (1968) Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the
prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), pp.589-
609.
12) Al-Wazier, R.A.H. (2024) Testing weak form efficiency of the Egyptian
and Saudi stock markets. Scientific Journal for Financial and Commercial
Studies and Research (SJFCSR), 5(1), pp. 1-25.
13) Anggraeni, S.S., Nurpratiwi, A.U., Ernawati, A., Latifah, M., Nurmala, M.
and Syakiran, N. (2023) The effect of return on asset (ROA) and return on
equity (ROE) on company value in cigarette companies listed on the
Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2021–2023. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen dan
Akuntansi, 9(1), pp.1–15.
14) Anghelache, G.V., Negru (Ciobanu), A. and Lepădatu, G. (2012) Models
for evaluating the company on FCFE and FCFF basis. Romanian Statistical
Journal – Supplement, Quarter IV, pp.70-80.
15) Aniyah, Supriyanto, Kumoro, D.F.C., Novitasari, D., Yuwono, T. and
Asbari, M. (2020) Analysis of the effect of quick ratio (QR), total assets
turn over (TATO), and debt to equity ratio (DER) on return on equity (ROE)
at PT. XYZ. Journal Industrial Engineering & Management Research
(JIEMAR), 1(3).
16) Antonakakis, N., Gupta, R. and Tiwari, A.K. (2016) Time-varying
correlations between inflation and stock prices in the United States over
the last two centuries. University of Pretoria Department of Economics
Working Paper Series, 2016-05.
17) Aorere, M. (2025) Egypt economic update 2025. New Zealand foreign
affairs market intelligence report.
18) Apple Inc. (2023) Annual report for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2023. Washington, D.C.: United States Securities and Exchange
Commission.
19) Ayyad, M.M.R.M. (2023) The impact of macroeconomic variables on
stock market performance in Egypt. Master's Degree in Economics. Benha
University.
20) Babela, I.S.T. and Mohammed, R.I. (2016) Business Failure Prediction
using Sherrod and Kida Models: Evidence from Banks Listed on Iraqi Stock
Exchange (2011 - 2014). Humanities Journal of University of Zakho
(HJUOZ), 4(2), pp. 35–47.
21) Berk, J., DeMarzo, P. and Harford, J. (2019) Fundamentals of corporate
finance. 4th edn. Harlow, England: Pearson.

46 | P a g e
22) Billmeier, A. and Massa, I. (2007) Go long or short in pyramids? News
from the Egyptian stock market. IMF Working Paper, No. WP/07/171.
23) Boons, M., Duarte, F.M., de Roon, F. and Szymanowska, M.
(2013) Time-varying inflation risk and stock returns. Federal Reserve Bank
of New York Staff Reports, No. 621.
24) Brealey, R.A., Myers, S.C. and Allen, F. (2020) Principles of corporate
finance. 12th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
25) Bruno, V. and Shin, H.S. (2018) Currency depreciation and emerging
market corporate distress. BIS Working Papers, No. 753.
26) Ca' Zorzi, M., Hahn, E. and Sánchez, M. (2007) Exchange rate pass-
through in emerging markets. European Central Bank Working Paper
Series, No. 739.
27) Carew, S. and Howcroft, E. (2025) Equities rise, dollar down with
Treasury yields as volatility eases. Reuters, [online] 17 July. Available at:
[URL] (Accessed: 17 July 2025).
28) Choudhury, M.M. (2024) Signaling theory: An approach to
organizational behavior research. Journal of Accounting, Business and
Management (JABM), 31(2), pp. 98-120.
29) Coppola, A., Krishnamurthy, A. and Xu, C. (2023) Liquidity, debt
denomination, and currency dominance. National Bureau of Economic
Research Working Paper, 30984.
30) Dawood, A.S.M., Akkad, M., Samir, N., Hussein, M., Ibrahim, A. and
Mohamed, B. (2021) The impact of macroeconomic variables on stock
price change percentage for the ESG listed companies in
Egypt. International Journal of Science and Management Studies, 4(6),
pp.1-12.
31) Dunkle Werner, K. and Jarvis, S. (2025) Rate of return regulation
revisited. Energy Institute at Haas Working Paper, 329R.
32) Elazhary, R.H., Amer, N.S. and Amer, G.M. (2024) Stock market
influence on domestic savings in Egypt: Structural modelling
dynamics. Journal of Business Research Faculty of Commerce -Zagazig
University, 46(2).
33) Eldomiaty, T., Azzam, I., Afifi, K.T.H. and Rashwan, M.H. (2024) An
alignment of financial signaling and stock return synchronicity. Journal of
Risk and Financial Management, 17(4), 162.
34) Eldomiaty, T., Saeed, Y. and Hammam, R. (2020) The associations
between stock prices, inflation rates, interest rates are still persistent:
Empirical evidence from stock duration model. Journal of Economics,
Finance and Administrative Science, 25(49), pp. 149-161.
35) Elewa, M.M. (2022) Using Altman Z-score models for predicting
financial distress for companies – the case of Egypt panel data
analysis. Alexandria Journal of Accounting Research, 6(1).
36) Elkahky, Y.A., Richter, C. and Yousri, D.M. (2024) Dynamic interrelation
between stock market index, exchange rate, T-Bills and policy rate: The
case of Egypt 2010-2020. Socialis Series in Social Science, 7, pp.86-106.

47 | P a g e
37) Elmahgop, F.O. and Sayed, O.A. (2020) The effect of inflation rates on
stock market returns in Sudan: The linear autoregressive distributed lag
model. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 10(7), pp.808-815. DOI:
10.18488/[Link].2020.107.808.815.
38) Elmoghany, H.A. (2024) Inflation hedge abilities of stock returns
compared to government debt securities in Egypt: Evidence from ARDL
and NARDL frameworks. Journal of Alexandria University for
Administrative Sciences, 61(5).
39) ElMosalamy, D. and Gamal, N. (2024) Efficient market hypothesis
revisited: Evidence from Egypt. MSA-Management Science Journal, 3(2),
pp.1-27.
40) European Central Bank (2022) Financial stability review. Frankfurt:
ECB, May.
41) Fabozzi, F.J. (2004) Short selling strategies, risks, and rewards.
Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
42) Fang, W. and Miller, S.M. (2002) Dynamic effects of currency
depreciation on stock market returns during the Asian financial crisis.
University of Connecticut Department of Economics Working Paper Series,
Working Paper 2002-31.
43) Farooq, U., Tabash, M.I., Hamouri, B., Daniel, L.N. and Saf, S.K. (2023)
Nexus between macroeconomic factors and corporate investment:
Empirical evidence from GCC markets. International Journal of Financial
Studies, 11(1), 35.
44) Fernandez, P. (2019) EVA and cash value added do NOT measure
shareholder value creation. IESE Business School Working Paper.
45) Fichtner, F. and Joebges, H. (2023) Stock market returns and GDP
growth. Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK) Study, No. 90.
46) Fitri, N. and Pramono, S.E. (2023) The role of financial performance in
moderating capital structure and macroeconomic uncertainty on stock
returns (Study on the Trade and Services Sector of the Indonesia Sharia
Stock Index). Postgraduated Journal of Islamic Economics, Finances and
Accounting Studies, 2(1), pp. 122-142.
47) Gendy, S., El siefy, E.S. and Fadaly, D. (2025) The effect of
macroeconomic factors on the performance of the Egyptian stock
market. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 8(6),
pp. 4822-4841. DOI: 10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i6-89.
48) Gulo, J. and Sembiring, J.C. (2024) The influence of gross profit margin,
net profit margin, company size, and sales growth on profit growth (in
manufacturing companies registered on bei in 2019-2022). Jurnal
Manajemen, 15(1), pp. 77-86.
49) Guerrón-Quintana, P.A. and Jinnai, R. (2022) On liquidity shocks and
asset prices. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 54(8), pp. 2289-2321.
50) Haa, J. and So, I. (2024) The economic effects of global inflation
uncertainty. International Journal of Central Banking, 20(2).

48 | P a g e
51) Halim, K.I. (2024) The effect of retention, debt to equity ratio, and
current ratio on company sustainable growth rate. InFestasi, 20(2), pp.
106-116.
52) Harrington, J.P., Nunes, C.S., Aboulamer, A. and Grabowski, R.J.
(2022) VALUATION HANDBOOK — INTERNATIONAL GUIDE TO COST OF
CAPITAL 2022 SUMMARY EDITION. CFA Institute Research Foundation.
53) He, L., Shen, C.H. and Shiu, C.Y. (2023) Mark-to-market or mark-to-
sentiment – the sensitivity of fair value measurement to investor
sentiment. Paper presented at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Accounting
and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand (AFAANZ).
54) Helmy, H.E. (2024) Are exchange rate, interest rate, and price level
pass-through to stock prices in Egypt symmetric or asymmetric? African
Review of Economics and Finance, 16(1).
55) Höflmayr, M. (2022) Inflation explained: What lies behind and what is
ahead? European Parliamentary Research Service, PE 729.352.
56) Hussain, S., Ali, R., Abdul Latiff, A.R., Fahlevi, M., Aljuaid, M. and
Saniuk, S. (2024) Moderating effects of net export and exchange rate on
profitability of firms: a two-step system generalized method of moments
approach. Cogent Economics & Finance, 12(1), 2302638. DOI:
10.1080/23322039.2024.2302638.
57) Ibrahimov, O., Vancsura, L. and Parádi-Dolgos, A. (2025) The impact of
macroeconomic factors on the firm's performance—Empirical analysis
from Türkiye. Economies, 13(4), 111.
58) Javangwe, K.Z. and Takawira, O. (2022) Exchange rate movement and
stock market performance: An application of the ARDL model. Economics
& Finance, 10, 2075520.
59) Jayathilaka, A.K.K.R. (2020) Operating profit and net profit:
Measurements of profitability. Open Access Library Journal, 7, e7011.
60) Jiang, G. and Sedik, T.S. (2019) Facing the Tides: Managing Capital
Flows in Asia Annex 1. Corporate Vulnerability in Asian Firms.
International Monetary Fund.
61) Khalid, F., Mukthar, N. and Abbass, J. (2025) The impact of firm growth
on firm performance with the moderating role of economic policy
uncertainty. Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review, 3(1).
62) Khalil, H.M. (2015) Investor trading behavior: empirical evidence from
the Egyptian stock exchange. Master's Thesis. American University in
Cairo.
63) Koller, T., Goedhart, M. and Wessels, D. (2020) Valuation: Measuring
and managing the value of companies. 7th edn. Hoboken, New Jersey:
John Wiley & Sons.
64) Konečný, Z. (2011) Economic value added as a dependence on the
corporate- and market-life cycle. Journal of Competitiveness, 3(2), pp. 88-
97.
65) Kuttu, K. (2024) Financial performance metrics: Assessing and
improving organizational health. Academy of Accounting and Financial
Studies Journal, 28(3), pp. 1-3.

49 | P a g e
66) Laitinen, E.K. and Laitinen, T. (2018) Financial reporting: profitability
ratios in the different stages of life cycle. Archives of Business Research,
6(11), pp.1-22.
67) Liu, Z.J. and Wang, Y.S. (2017) Effect of earnings management on
economic value added: G20 and African countries study. South African
Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 20(1).
68) Madurapperuma, W. (2023) The dynamic relationship between
economic crisis, macroeconomic variables and stock prices in Sri
Lanka. Journal of Money and Business, 3(1), pp. 25-42.
69) Maraoui, N., Amor, T.H., Khefacha, I. and Rault, C. (2021) How do
economic, political, and institutional factors influence the choice of
exchange rate regimes? New evidence from selected MENA countries.
Economic Research Forum Working Paper, No. 1498.
70) Maurer, M. (2025) In 2025, accounting rulemaker to explore non-GAAP
and R&D spending. The Wall Street Journal, [online] 17 July. Available
at: [Link]
explore-non-gaap-and-r-d-spending-419f0a1 (Accessed: 17 July 2025).
71) Mauro, P. (2000) Stock returns and output growth in emerging and
advanced economies. IMF Working Paper, WP/00/89.
72) Mauboussin, M.J. and Callahan, D. (2022) Counterpoint Global Insights
Return on Invested Capital How to Calculate ROIC and Manage Common
Issues. Morgan Stanley Investment Management.
73) Medjoub, A. and Houas, A. (2020) A comparative study between
Altman, Kida and Sherrod's model in predicting the financial failure of
listed companies in Amman Stock Exchange. Economic and Management
Research Journal, 14(3), pp.87-106.
74) Miranda, B.B. (2024) Equity valuation: Iberdrola, S.A. Master's thesis.
ISCTE Business School.
75) Mohammed, A.A.M. (2020) Analytical analysis for the impact of fair
value accounting on audit quality practices. Journal of Commercial and
Environmental Studies (JCES), 11(4).
76) Mousanezhad, S., Mohammadi, E., Sabzalipour, F. and Mohamadipor, R.
(2021) Using contingency approach to improve firms' financial
performance forecasts. Advances in Mathematical Finance & Applications,
6(2), pp. 357-376. DOI: 10.22034/amfa.2020.1886008.1345.
77) Murtala, S., Ibrahim, M., Lawal, S. and Abdullahi, B.B. (2018) Capital
structure and return on capital employed of construction companies in
Nigeria. African Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 6(1).
78) Nam, N.H.P. and Tuyen, T.T.M. (2024) Impact of liquidity on capital
structure and financial performance of non financial listed companies in
the vietnam stock market. Future Business Journal, 10(1), 126.
79) Nissim, D. and Penman, S. (2008) Principles for the application of fair
value accounting. Center for Excellence in Accounting & Security Analysis
White Paper, Number Two.

50 | P a g e
80) Nowicki, J., Ratajczak, P. and Szutowski, D. (2024) Impact of
Macroeconomic Factors on Financial Liquidity of Companies: A Moderation
Analysis. Sustainability, 16(11), 4483.
81) Nyakurukwa, K. and Seetharam, Y. (2023) Alternatives to the efficient
market hypothesis: an overview. Journal of Capital Markets Studies, 7(2),
pp. 111-124.
82) Ozcan, S.K., Liu, X. and Shim, I. (2021) Exchange rate fluctuations and
firm leverage. IMF Economic Review, 69, pp. 90–121.
83) Pacini, K., Mayer, P., Attar, S. and Azam, J. (2017) Macroeconomic
factors and firm performance in the United Kingdom. Journal of Smart
Economic Growth, 2(3).
84) Pangesti, M.D. and Siddiq, S.F.R. (2023) The effect of leverage,
profitability, and profit growth on earnings quality. Journal of Business and
Information Systems, 5(2), pp. 123-135.
85) Park, H.U. (2017) Changes in operating margins during a sales decline
and abnormal returns. PhD thesis. Temple University.
86) Pratama, D.T. and Akhmadi (2024) Profitability and capital structure on
firm value with currency exchange rate as moderation. International
Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 7(7), pp.4581-4590. DOI:
10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i07-07.
87) Purkayastha, A. and Filatotchev, I. (2023) Foreign equity valuations of
emerging market firms: The effects of institutional distance and
information spillovers. Management International Review, 63, pp.1021–
1062.
88) Puspitasari, E., Sudiyatno, B., Masdjojo, G. and Meiranto, W. (2023)
Profiling intellectual capital performance and return on invested capital:
Evidence from industrial Indonesian banking. International Journal of
Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 7(2).
89) Puspitaningtyas, Z. (2019) Empirical evidence of market reactions
based on signaling theory in Indonesia stock exchange. Investment
Management and Financial Innovations, 16(2), pp. 66-77.
90) Sabol, A. and Sverer, F. (2016) A review of the economic value added
literature and application. UTMS Journal of Economics, 8(1), pp.19–27.
91) Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (2024) *2023 business report for the
year ended December 31, 2023*. South Korea: Samsung Electronics.
92) Santoso, A. and Nurhidayati (2022) Ownership of management as a
moderating of impact profitability to firm value. Jurnal Konsep Bisnis dan
Manajemen, 9(1). DOI: 10.31289/jkbm.v9i1.8314.
93) Saraoğlu, A.C. (2017) Stock price reactions to dividend changes: A
comparative test of signalling theory and market efficiency in the
emerging EMEA stock markets. PhD thesis. Kadir Has University.
94) Shamma, E. (2024) The impact of internal and external factors on
financial performance during periods of economic instability: An empirical
study of non-financial firms listed in Egypt. Journal of Commercial and
Environmental Studies, 15(4), pp.677–720.

51 | P a g e
95) Sinurat, B., Abdullah, A.E.A., Musri'ah, Hakim, L. and Wildan, M.A.
(2025) The influence of return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE)
on stock prices in banking companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange
for the 2023-2024 period. International Journal of Economics and
Management Research, [online] Available at: [URL if available].
96) Sjövall, H. (2023) INFLATION AND INTEREST What does high inflation
imply? Master's thesis. Umeå School of Business and Economics.
97) Soliman, M.T. (2007) The use of DuPont analysis by market
participants. The Accounting Review, 83(3), pp. 823-853.
98) Sukendri, N., Muktiyanto, A., Geraldina, I. and Safitri, J. (2024) Agency
theory in banking: Balancing incentives and mitigating moral hazard in
the principal-agent dilemma. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences,
22(2), pp. 22877-22887.
99) Sulastri, Isnurhadi, Widiyanti, M. and Saftiana, Y. (2023) Working
capital behavior, risk and profitability: Empirical study of manufacturing
companies in Indonesia. Sultanist: Journal of Economics and Business,
7(4), pp. 321-342. DOI: 10.29259/sijdeb.v7i4.321-342.
100) Supriyadi, T. (2021) Effect of return on assets (ROA), return on equity
(ROE), and net profit margin (NPM) on the company's value in
manufacturing companies listed on the exchange Indonesia securities
year 2016-2019. International Journal of Economics, Business and
Management Research, 5(4).
101) Suseno, M.A. (2020) Financial performance, macroeconomic factors
and company characteristics in consumer goods company in
Indonesia. International Journal of Economics, Business, and Accounting
Research (IJEBAR), 4(3).
102) Suteja, J., Gunardi, A., Alghifari, E.S., Susiadi, A.A., Yulianti, A.S. and
Lestari, A. (2022) Investment Decision and Firm Value: Moderating Effects
of Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability of Non-Financial Sector
Companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Journal of Risk and Financial
Management, 16(1), 40.
103) Szutowski, D. (2024) The impact of macroeconomic factors on the
profitability of companies. Analysis using neural networks. Scientific
Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and
Management Series, (193), pp.[page range].
104) Thomas, A.H. (1994) Expected devaluation and economic
fundamentals. IMF Staff Papers, 41(2), pp.262-285.
105) Touny, M.A. and Abdelaziz, N.M. (2025) The impact of market efficiency
on stock fair value: Evidence from Arab markets. Scientific Journal of
Business Research and Studies, 39(1).
106) U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (2015) Measuring the economy: A
primer on GDP and the national income and product accounts.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
107) van der Poll, H.M., Booyse, N.J., Pienaar, A.J., Büchner, S. and Foot, J.
(2011) An overview of the implementation of Economic Value Added

52 | P a g e
 (EVA™) performance measures in South Africa. Southern African Business
Review, 15(3), pp. 1-23.
108) Vrbka, J. and Vitková, P. (2021) The applicability of FCFF method
evaluating an enterprise of Real Estate segment. SHS Web of
Conferences, 91, 01042.
109) Yalçın, K.C. (2010) Market rationality: Efficient market hypothesis
versus market anomalies. European Journal of Economic and Political
Studies, 3(2), pp. 123-138.
110) Yuliana, M., Maknun, A.B.A., Habbe, A.H. and Nagu, N. (2024)
Systematic literature review of market efficiency in emerging
markets. Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani (MUDIMA), 4(7), pp. 919-927. DOI:
10.55927/mudima.v4i7.10131.
111) Yuksel, S., Ugur, P. and Dede, O.B. (2015) A model suggestion for cash
conversion of inventory and basement of model financial ratios
analysis. European Scientific Journal, 1, pp. 185-201.
112) Yusof, N.Z.M. (2016) Corporate governance research in emerging
economies: The need for alternative perspectives. The European
Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, [online] Available at: [URL if
available].
113) Zenzerović, R. (2021) Do companies that generate profits make
economic value added? e-mentor, 2(99), pp. 83–88.
114) Zhang, J. (2024) Manufacturing enterprises' gross margins and
performance: A study on the moderating effect of management expenses
and R&D expenses. Master's thesis. Singapore Management University.

53 | P a g e