Indian Economy: Trade Policy & FDI Insights
Indian Economy: Trade Policy & FDI Insights
Economic growth refers to the increase in a country's actual national and per capita income over time, typically measured quantitatively in output. Economic development encompasses not just growth but also qualitative improvements in social, cultural, and political structures, aimed at ensuring equitable income distribution and reducing poverty. While growth is a component of development, development includes broader societal advancements .
FIIs and FPIs are pivotal in India's capital market, providing liquidity and access to a broader investor base, which can boost market confidence and valuation. However, their volatile nature can destabilize markets during economic or political disruptions. In FY 2021-22, net FPIs showed a negative outflow of $11.97 billion, a stark contrast to the net inflow of $36.14 billion in the previous year, reflecting their volatility and sensitivity to changing market conditions .
Elements contributing to economic development include changes in resource availability, capital formation, technology adoption, skills and efficiency improvements, and organizational and institutional reforms. These factors together aim to achieve sustained material well-being, equitable income distribution, and employment generation, marking broader socio-economic progress .
During the 1990s, India's foreign trade policy underwent significant liberalization, transitioning from a highly protected economy with high tariffs and no foreign investment to one with more competitive domestic markets internationally. The primary objectives were to globalize the Indian economy, boost industry competitiveness, and improve the balance of payments situation by addressing inherent concerns .
The Indian Foreign Trade Policy of 2015-2020 introduced the 'Merchandise Exports India Scheme (MEIS)' and the 'Services Exports India Scheme (SEIS)'. MEIS aimed to promote the export of specified products to designated destinations, while SEIS focused on promoting exports of specified services provided by Indian service providers. These schemes merged previous reward schemes and were designed to simplify the export process and provide incentives for products and services with strong domestic content .
FDI is prohibited in specific sectors including gambling and betting, lottery businesses, and activities not open to private sector investment like atomic energy and railways. These restrictions are due to strategic, socio-political, or ethical considerations, aiming to protect national interests, maintain strategic industries under government control, and prevent socio-economic issues .
FII refers to short-term capital in Indian stock markets that is highly volatile and susceptible to rapid withdrawal, affecting market stability. In contrast, FDI involves long-term investment in physical assets and industries, thus contributing to stable economic development by enhancing productivity, job creation, and technology transfer. FIIs are typically driven by market opportunities, whereas FDIs are often strategic investments .
FDIs are structurally categorized into Greenfield FDI, Brownfield FDI, and Joint Ventures. Greenfield FDI involves a parent company establishing a subsidiary from scratch in a foreign country, such as McDonald's and Hyundai India. Brownfield FDI occurs when a foreign company purchases an existing company in the host country, exemplified by Daiichi Sankyo's acquisition of Ranbaxy India. Joint Ventures involve shared investments and cooperative agreements between foreign and local firms, like Tata Motors partnering with foreign investors .
FDIs serve as a critical engine for economic growth in India by maintaining high growth rates, enhancing productivity, and generating employment. They also bring in capital and technology, boost competitiveness, and help integrate domestic industries into the global market, which is essential for sustaining economic development .
Investments via the automatic route do not require prior government or RBI approval and are limited to sectors specified in the consolidated FDI policy. In contrast, foreign investment proposals in sectors not covered by the automatic route must seek government approval, involving more scrutiny and administrative processes. This distinction facilitates ease of doing business while maintaining regulatory oversight in strategic or sensitive sectors .