0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views38 pages

Understanding Deconstructivism in Architecture

Uploaded by

Akshada Tapkir
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views38 pages

Understanding Deconstructivism in Architecture

Uploaded by

Akshada Tapkir
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

HOA- V

DECONSTRUCTIVISM

GROUP MEMBERS:
20122005 ABHAY KUSHWAHA
20122011 ANKIT KHOTEL
20122020 DEVENDRA MAHOBE
20122077 VISHAL MURMU
INTRODUCTION
Deconstructivism:- An architectural movement or style influenced by
deconstruction that encourages radical freedom of form and the open manifestation
of complexity in a building rather than strict attention to functional concerns and
conventional design elements (such as right angles or grids).
JACQUES DERRIDA (FATHER OF DECONSTRUCTIVISM)
Theory of Deconstructivism:- The point of the
deconstructive analysis is to restructure or “displace,”
the opposition, not simply to reverse it.

HOW JACQUES DERRIDA THEORY INSPIRED


DECONSTRUCTIVISM
It is a movement that appeared in the 1980s as a
response to Modernism and Postmodernism. It is
characterized by the absence of unity, harmony, and
symmetry and is denoted commonly through distorted
geometry or fragmentation of constructed building.
DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS
● No physically pure basic volume.
● Fragmented Mass.
● New Material (Metals, Glass, Concrete).
● Complicated Structure, and thus advanced structural systems.
● Relatively high Void percentage.
● Open Plan.
● Distinguishing from Context.
TIMELINE OF IMPORTANT BUILDING THAT
BROUGHT FOCUS ON
DECONSTRUCTION
EVENT

1978-88 1982 1985 1987


1982
1987
1982-85

The city edge project ‚Daniel libeskind


An office and residential development
Blocenter for the university of
for district in berlin. It is a Colossal bar
frankfurt, Peter Elsenman
Parc de La Villete paris, Bernard Tschumi angle 1987
Apartment building and observation This project is a public Park
This project is a public Park populated by from the ground so that one end floats
tower by Rem koolhaas populated by an array of
10 stories. The wall for the being
It is enigmatically poised between being an array of scattered structures link by a scattered structures link by a
broken into pieces which are then is
complex series of Garden galleries and complex series of Garden
essentially a single slab a homogeneous galleries and meandering
twisted against each other, the wall
monolith but distorted by a number of meandering [Link] simple [Link] simple
need to cross over itself many times
towers and being essentially a row of geometric shapes circle square and in a way that conflict with its stability
geometric shapes circle
triangle are superimposed and produced to simply define enclosure.
discrete towers, distorted by slab. square and triangle are
distortion superimposed and produced
distortion

The peak hong kong by Zaha M Hadid


This is artificial topography for huge beams, turned over onto their sides and driven into the
Hillside to form horizontal skyscraper. Project's force comes from the violent intersection Rooftop remodeling vienna, Coop himmelblau
between these linear beams and the volumes of the artificial topography It is a renovation of Attic space of a traditional Apartment block the
stable form has been infected by unstable biomorphic structure of
The Gehry house, Frank Gehry skeletal wind organism which distorts the form that houses it yet, new
It is composed of cubes and bars in disturbed form but the internal volume of bar structure is highly strung a metallic structure, it is not only a wing a
is not disturbed pure form is integrated in a way that it reveals its twisted and means of flight, a source of lift but also a leading edge, a cutting edge
splintered structure etc.
CHANGES
FORMS ARE MORE
FRAGMENTED WITH TIME
GAP

Parc de la Villette (1982) Walt Disney Concert Hall


(1999-2003)

CCTV Headquarters (2004)

Dancing House (1992)


ANALYSIS
WHY VISUAL ANALYSIS

Through Visual Analysis we observe the


relation between function and form of
building on visually analysing a plan we are
able to segregate the form and function of
building with its fragmented shapes.

HOW WE ANALYSE
As we can taking two building of
deconstructivism which have similarities in
designing of form as well as material but there is
a difference in planning aspects, as we know
elements of design (Repetition, circulation,
void, focal points, asymmetry, Hierarchy). On
observing these elements of design on both
plane we can visualize it.
GUGGENHEIM MUSEUM IN BILBAO

● Guggenheim museum is located


in Abando Bilbao, Spain.
● The building is a Art museum.
● Juan Ignacio Vidarte is the
director of the museum.
● It is a museum of modern and
contemporary art designed by
Canadian - American architect
FRANK GEHRY
● The museum was inaugurated
on 18th October 1997
GUGGENHEIM MUSEUM IN BILBAO (PLAN) It is situated on a plot of
32,500 square meters, of
which 24,000 square
meters are occupied by
building. 9,066 square
meters are devoted to
exhibition spaces
1. GALLERY
2. WATER GARDEN
3. CAFE/BOOKSTORE
4. LOADING
DOCK/RECEIVING
5. ENTRY
6. STORAGE
7. ATRIUM
8. AUDITORIUM
9. PARKING
10. RETAIL
11. RETAIL STORAGE
12. CRATE STORAGE
REPETITION:- Although the shapes of the
rooms are not the same, not of any real
defined geometric shape, they are very
similar conceptually.
CIRCULATION:- The central
atrium serves as the point of
convergence and the galleries
branch off from it.
FOCALPOINT:- All sections of
the building seem to converge
somewhere in the center, like a
lotus flower. The long gallery
rooms in particular seem to
create a radial design.
ASYMMETRY:- There is no
clear pattern or definition of
symmetry on ary axis and the
design is freely executed.
HIERARCHY:- Each room is placed at a different
height and none are exactly the same shape or size.
VOID:- The inner lighting of building highlighting the inside portion of building which
creates a Accentuation.
WALT DISNEY CONCERT HALL

● Walt disney concert hall is


located in Los angeles united
state.
● The building is a The music
center.
● Designed by architect American
architect FRANK GEHRY .
● The project was initiated in 1987.
WALT DISNEY CONCERT HALL(PLAN)
The Hall consists of
approximately 27870.912
square meter of building
8 area over a footprint of
4
14585.7 square meter
6
1. MAIN ENTRANCE
2. BOX OFFICE
10 9 3. GIFT SHOP
4. GARDEN
5. PARKING
5 6. CHILDREN AMPHITHEATRE
7
1 7. DINING AREA
8. REDCAT THEATER
2 9. RECEPTION AREA
3 10. AUDITORIUM
REPETITION:- The shapes of the rooms are
not the same but the placement is connecting
the visual concept of designing and merging
the form shapes.
CIRCULATION:-
The central
portion is main,
and circulation is
from all sides
serves as the
point of
converging to
people from all
sides.
ASYMMETRY:-
There is no clear
pattern or
definition of
symmetry on ary
axis and the
design is freely
executed.
VOID:- The facade created by
windows on some of the galleries
which creates Accentuation.

ELEVATION
ASYMMETRY:- There is Asymmetry in plan as well as in elevation, but in elevation there is
balance which creates proper visibility to building not converging to one point.

ELEVATION
COMPARISON OF BUILDINGS
COMPARISON OF VISUAL ANALYSIS OF BOTH BUILDING

VISUAL ANALYSIS GUGGENHEIM MUSEUM IN WALT DISNEY CONCERT HALL


BILBAO

● REPETITION BOTH HAVE REPETITION REPETITION

● CIRCULATION CONVERGING ALL AREAS TO CENTRAL CONVERGING PEOPLE FROM ALL


ATRIUM SIDES TO CENTRAL HALL

● FOCAL POINT IT CREATES A RADIAL DESIGN NO FOCAL POINT

● ASYMMETRY ASYMMETRY IN PLAN AND ELEVATION ASYMMETRY IN PLAN AND ELEVATION,


BOTH BUT HAVE BALANCED ELEVATION

● HIERARCHY EACH ROOMS HAVE DIFFERENT SHAPES, SOME HAVE SAME SHAPE BUT
SIZES AND HEIGHT DIFFERENCE IN HEIGHT

● VOID BOTH CREATES ACCENTUATION FROM VOIDS


VISUAL ANALYSIS
OF
SOME OTHER BUILDINGS
1. DANCING HOUSE, CZECH REPUBLIC (1992)
● Architect - Frank Gehry
● Location- Prague Czechia

REPETITION CURVES AND BOXES

CIRCULATION ZONE WISE

FOCAL POINT NO FOCAL POINT

ASYMMETRY YES BUT BALANCED

VOID PUNCTURES (WINDOWS)


2. NORTON HOUSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION

● Architects: Frank Gehry


● Location: 2509 Ocean Front Walk, Los Angeles,
Venice Beach, United State

REPETITION NO

CIRCULATION NON FOCUSED LINEAR


CIRCULATION

FOCAL POINT NO FOCAL POINT

ASYMMETRY SYMMETRY THROUGH PLAN NOT


AS ELEVATION

VOID TO MUCH WINDOWS WHICH


CREATES VOID
3. PHARAOH DENTAL CLINIC
● Architect - Shin Takamatsu
● Location- Kyoto, Japan

REPETITION SO MUCH

CIRCULATION NON FOCUSED LINEAR


CIRCULATION

FOCAL POINT FOCUSED ON ELEVATION DUE TO


VOID

ASYMMETRY BALANCED THROUGH


ELEVATION

VOID IT CREATES A FRAME FROM


CENTRAL VOID
4. ART AND SCIENCE MUSEUM
● Architect - Moshe Safdie
● Location- 6 Bayfront Ave, Singapore
018974

REPETITION YES

CIRCULATION CONVERGING

FOCAL POINT FOCUSED AT CENTRE

ASYMMETRY YES

VOID YES AT END OF LEAVES


5. FONDATION LOUIS VUITTON
● Architect- Frank Gehry
● Location- 8 Av. Du Mahatma Gandhi,
Paris, France

REPETITION YES

CIRCULATION CONVERGING AT DIFFERENT


ZONES

FOCAL POINT NO

ASYMMETRY YES BUT BALANCED THROUGH


ELEVATION

VOID ACCENTUATION FROM VOID


6. HAVENHUIS
● Architect- Zaha Hadid
● Location- Belgium

REPETITION YES

CIRCULATION CONVERGING AT DIFFERENT


ZONES

FOCAL POINT NO

ASYMMETRY YES

VOID ACCENTUATION FROM VOID


[Link] CLINIC LOU RUVO
Architect- Frank Gehry
Location- 888 W Bonneville Ave, Las Vegas,
Nv 89106, Usa

REPETITION BOXES SHAPE

CIRCULATION ZONE WISE

FOCAL POINT NO

ASYMMETRY YES BUT BALANCED

VOID PUNCTURES (WINDOW)


8. NEUER ZOLLHOF
Architect- Frank Gehry
Location- Neuer Zollhof 2-6, 40221
Düsseldorf, Germany

REPETITION REPETITIVE PATTERNS

CIRCULATION ZONE WISE

FOCAL POINT NO

ASYMMETRY YES BUT BALANCED

VOID PUNCTURES (WINDOW)


THREE BUILDINGS ARE SHOWING SIMILARITIES ON
VISUAL ANALYSIS

VISUAL CLEVELAND CLINIC DANCING HOUSE, CZECH


NEUER ZOLLHOF
ANALYSIS LOU RUVO REPUBLIC (1992)

•REPETITION BOXES SHAPE BOTH HAVE REPETITION REPETITIVE PATTERNS

•CIRCULATION ZONE WISE ZONE WISE ZONE WISE

•FOCAL POINT NO NO NO

ASYMMETRY BUT ASYMMETRY BUT BALANCED ASYMMETRY BUT BALANCED


•ASYMMETRY
BALANCED

PUNCTURES (WINDOW) PUNCTURES (WINDOW) PUNCTURES (WINDOW)


•VOID
UNDERSTANDING
By visually analysing the plan we understand how the relation between function and form works
in which one building shows function follows form and the other building shows form follows
function which gives an analysis to change the function of plan if it is in fragmented shape to
make it properly planned and use it in our plan form these observation we conclude that in a
deconstructivism style with fragmented shapes proper planning aspects according to
building types are maintained.
BIBLIOGRAPHY

● [Link]
● [Link]
nk-o-gehry-associates
● [Link]
● [Link]
● [Link]
THANK YOU

You might also like