0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views67 pages

Solar Rooftop OPEX Models in Asia

The document outlines the role of GIZ in supporting the German Government's international cooperation for sustainable development, focusing on the renewable energy sector in Bangladesh. It analyzes the potential of rooftop solar (RTS) models, particularly the OPEX model, and compares it with the more common CAPEX model, highlighting challenges and recommendations for promoting RTS in Bangladesh. The report emphasizes the need for innovative business models, regulatory support, and a robust data logging system to enhance the growth and efficiency of rooftop solar installations.

Uploaded by

Taisir Jibian
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views67 pages

Solar Rooftop OPEX Models in Asia

The document outlines the role of GIZ in supporting the German Government's international cooperation for sustainable development, focusing on the renewable energy sector in Bangladesh. It analyzes the potential of rooftop solar (RTS) models, particularly the OPEX model, and compares it with the more common CAPEX model, highlighting challenges and recommendations for promoting RTS in Bangladesh. The report emphasizes the need for innovative business models, regulatory support, and a robust data logging system to enhance the growth and efficiency of rooftop solar installations.

Uploaded by

Taisir Jibian
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

As a federally owned enterprise, GIZ supports the German Government

in achieving its objectives in the field of international cooperation for


sustainable development.

Published by:
Deutsche Gesellschaft für
Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH

Registered offices
Bonn and Eschborn, Germany

GIZ Bangladesh
PO Box 6091, Gulshan 1
T + 880 2 5506 8746-52
F + 880 2 5506 8753

E giz-bangladesh@[Link]
I [Link]/bangladesh

Project:
Policy Advisory for Promoting Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Authors:
Sebastian Groh, Renewable Energy Business Expert and Independent Consultant

Review and Input:


Tobias März, Senior Solar Power Expert, 8.2 Renewable Energy Experts Hamburg GmbH
Md Abdul Gaffar, Energy Advisor, PAP, GIZ Bangladesh

On behalf of
German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ)

Distribution:
April 2024, Bangladesh
A Comparative Analysis of Enabling
Environment for Solar Rooftop OPEX Models
in Bangladesh, China, India, and Vietnam

April 2024

1
Contents
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 8
1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................11
1.1 Background of the study ..........................................................................................11
1.2 What is rooftop solar (RTS) .....................................................................................13
1.3 RTS characteristics based on type of energy off-taker and type of business model .16
1.3.1 Off-taker of energy ....................................................................................16
1.3.2 Business models .......................................................................................19
2 RTS OPEX models ................................................................................................................20
2.1 Characteristics of the OPEX model..........................................................................20
2.2 Step by Step Process Diagram of an OPEX model..................................................23
2.3 RTS in Bangladesh: Current market and trends.......................................................24
2.4 Stakeholders and Regulatory Setup ........................................................................28
2.4.1 Stakeholders .............................................................................................28
2.4.2 Regulatory Setup ......................................................................................30
3. Challenges of the OPEX Model and Potential Risk Mitigation ....................................31
3.1 Challenges of the OPEX model ...............................................................................31
3.2 Risk Mitigation .........................................................................................................34
4 RTS environment in selected countries ..................................................................................36
4.1 RTS market and trends............................................................................................36
4.1.1 India ..........................................................................................................36
4.1.2 Vietnam.....................................................................................................37
4.1.3 China ........................................................................................................39
4.2 Stakeholders and regulatory environment................................................................42
4.2.1 India ..........................................................................................................42
4.2.2 Vietnam.....................................................................................................43
4.2.3 China ........................................................................................................45
5 Case Studies..........................................................................................................................48
5.1 India ........................................................................................................................48
5.2 Vietnam ...................................................................................................................49
5.3 China .......................................................................................................................50
5.4 Bangladesh .............................................................................................................51
5.5 Comparison of Bangladesh RTS OPEX market to India, Vietnam, and China .........55
6 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................57

2
6.1 General remarks ......................................................................................................57
6.4 Specific Recommendations for Bangladesh.............................................................59
7 Bibliography ...........................................................................................................................62

Figures
Figure 1: Financing Model Comparison for RTS (Source: Author’s depiction) ...........................12
Figure 2: Annual global solar installations by system type (Source: PV Magazine, 2022) .........13
Figure 3: C&I solar installations per continent (Source: PV Magazine, 2022) ............................14
Figure 4: Step by step process diagram of an OPEX model ......................................................23
Figure 5: Expected growth of the solar energy market in Bangladesh (Source: Mordor Intelligence,
2023) ........................................................................................................................................24
Figure 6: Growth of PV installations in Bangladesh ...................................................................25
Figure 7: Bangladesh Solar System overview ...........................................................................26
Figure 8: Market segmentation Bangladesh ..............................................................................27
Figure 9: State-wise share rooftop solar installations (as of July 2023) (Source: Gulia et al., 2023)
.................................................................................................................................................37
Figure 10: RTS capacity by customer segment until Dec 2020 (Source: UNICEF, 2022) ..........38
Figure 11: Cumulative solar PV installed capacity by Province (GW) 2021 (GIZ, 2022) ............40
Figure 12: China PV market scenarios 2023 – 2030 (Source: CPIA, 2023) ...............................41
Figure 13: World's largest C&I installation, Jining, Shandong, China (Source: Hill, 2021) .........41
Figure 14: China's Feed-in Tariff and Subsidy for PV projects, 2013 - 2020 (RMB/kWh, including
tax) (Source: Martinot et al., 2020) ............................................................................................47
Figure 15: Project implementation process ...............................................................................53

3
List of Abbreviations

AC Alternating Current

ADB Asian Development Bank

BDT Bangladeshi Taka

BERC Bangladesh Energy Regulatory Commission

BET Birla Education Trust

BJMC Bangladesh Jute Mills Corporation

BTM Behind-the-Meter

C-PPA Corporate Power Purchase Agreement

C&I Commercial & Industrial

CAGR Compound Annual Growth Rate

CAPEX Capital Expenditure

CFA Central Financial Assistance

COD Commercial Operation Date

DISCOM Distribution Companies

DoE Department of Energy

DPDC Dhaka Power Distribution Company

DPPA Direct Power Purchase Agreement

EPC Engineering, Procurement, and Construction

ESCO Energy Service Company

4
EVN Vietnam Electricity

EZ Economic Zone

FDR Fixed Deposit Receipt

FIT Feed-in Tariffs

FOREX Foreign Exchange

FPV Floating Solar Photovoltaic

FY Financial Year

GDP Gross Domestic Production

GHG Greenhouse Gas(es)

GIZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale


Zusammenarbeit

GMPV Ground Mounted Photovoltaic

GWM Great Wall Motor

GWp Gigawatt-peak

HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning

IDCOL Infrastructure Development Company Limited

IEA International Energy Agency

IPG International Partners Group

IPPs Independent Power Projects

IRENA International Renewable Energy Agency

IRR Internal Rate of Return

JETP Just Energy Transition Partnership

JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency

5
kWh Kilowatt-hour

kWp Kilowatt-peak

LC Letter of Credit

LCOE Levelized Cost of Electricity

LEED Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design

MNRE Ministry of New and Renewable Energy

MOIT Ministry of Industry and Trade

MW Megawatt

NBR National Board of Revenue

NDCs Nationally Determined Contributions

NDRC National Development and Reform Commission

NEA National Energy Administration

NEM Net Metering

O&M Operation & Maintenance

OA Open Access

OPEX Operating Expenditure

PBP Payback Period

PDP Project Development Programme

PE Project Engineer

PGCB Power Grid Company of Bangladesh

PPA Power Purchase Agreement

PPP Public Private Partnership

6
PV Photovoltaic

QC Quality Control

R&D Research & Development

REB Rural Electrification Board

RESCO Renewable Energy Service Company

RMB Chinese Currency- Renminbi

RMG Ready-made Garments

ROI Return on Investment

RTS Rooftop Solar

SHS Solar Home System

SREDA Sustainable and Renewable Energy Development


Authority

UPS Uninterrupted Power Supply

USD US Dollar

VAT Value Added Tax

VND Vietnamese Dong

WBS Work Breakdown Structure

7
Executive Summary
The Government of Bangladesh embarked on advancing the Renewable Energy Sector through
a phased strategy, marked by the enactment of the "Renewable Energy Policy of Bangladesh,
2008”. This policy is designed to bolster the integration of renewable energy technologies.
Bangladesh is guided by strategic imperatives, including ensuring energy security, enhancing the
reliability and availability of modern electricity, championing environmental protection, fostering
sustainable development, promoting social equity, addressing climate change, and tackling
related challenges. Notably, renewables, particularly in solar PV and wind energy, have witnessed
substantial growth worldwide over the past decade, characterized by increased deployment,
technological advancements, and improved cost competitiveness. Bangladesh has installed 1.2
GW of renewable energy as of January 2024, out of which 1 GW comes from solar PV. This
represents less than 5% of the country’s installed capacity, against a goal of reaching 10% by
2021, 30% by 2030, and 40% by 2041.

Due to a postulated scarcity of available land for utility-scale solar installations, rooftop solar has
emerged as a promising technology that can be scaled up rapidly to advance against the goals
set. Most of the uptake to date is via a model where commerce and industry owners invest into
the assets and the engineering, procurement and construction is handled by a dedicated rooftop
solar provider, generally in South Asia referred to as CAPEX model. Less prevalent to date is the
third-party or “OPEX” model, where the rooftop solar provider acts as an energy service company
and invests itself into the assets against a power purchase agreement with the off-taker.

The report walks the reader through the steps of a typical OPEX project flow, runs a comparative
assessment against the more prevalent CAPEX model and draws out challenges and potential
mitigation steps. Key challenges include the ongoing USD crisis that prohibit any party without
access to foreign currency to open a letter of credit and with that the ability to import the required
resources, such as PV panels and inverters, a (perceived) high degree of off-taker risk combined
with limited mitigation option given the weak rule of law in the country, concerns over roof integrity
against a 20 year long power purchase agreement, and lastly a lack of regulatory freedom and/
or action to install rooftop solar in special economic zones or on public infrastructure.

The report also draws insights via international rooftop solar case studies. It infers that the Indian
state of Gujarat clearly stands out here with its successful residential policy and the favorable
stance of its DISCOMs towards rooftop solar. For developing rooftop solar, Bangladesh can look
at Delhi for its policy design and emulate Gujarat for its effective implementation. To improve the

8
accessibility and reach of rooftop solar solutions, Bangladesh must actively promote innovative
business models.

Reducing GHG emissions in supply chains is becoming a key factor in the sourcing strategies for
global fashion brands. Here, increased levels of RTS installations are a key enabler for
decarbonization, and therefore also for retaining the competitiveness of Bangladesh’s vital RMG
sector. However, even under a scenario of increased RTS installations on the premises of the
supply factories, global fashion brands will not be able to make good on their global commitments
in scope 3 emission reductions1. Therefore, Corporate Power Purchase Agreements would
present a possible solution and deserve further investigation.

The report extracts further recommendations to promote and accelerate the growth of rooftop
solar, in particular via the OPEX modality in Bangladesh, such as divisional/ district wise
renewable energy targets along with a strict timeline in synch with the Mujib Prosperity Plan, to
liaison with the National Board of Revenue to waive customs duty and vat for all RE equipment
and machinery (not restricted to independent power producers holding a power purchasing
agreement with the Government), to provide incentives for the use of storage in combination with
RTS and in the EV sector for charging stations, to provide private developers with government
PPAs for projects on public infrastructures, such as airports, metro stations, other larger public
buildings, etc., to provide private developers with government PPAs for RTS installation on C&I
factories, and create a national guarantee fund to give financial players more comfort and bring
down the hurdle of bank guarantee requirements, among several others.

To fortify the monitoring and enhance the data-driven financial forecasting capabilities and quality
assurance of solar rooftop implementations in Bangladesh, it is strongly recommended to
establish a robust national data logging system. The recent advancements in the solar rooftop
sector have laid the foundation for significant progress. However, to date, the sector operates
largely on feasibility assessments and long-term yield projections based on theoretical values.
Through technical assistance, SREDA should be empowered to encompass real-time project
yield tracking and benchmarking, aggregate tracking of national renewable energy impact and
emission savings, as well as smart features for stable grid operation. This should result in a
dynamic national database that should be open to the public and be accessible to the key
stakeholders, such as the C&I owners, EPC providers and financiers. dynamic national database.

1 “Scope 3“: Purchased goods and services. Many companies worldwide have set themselves emission
reduction targets under the „sciencebased climate change targets“ (SBTs).
9
This database will enable more detailed grid stability assessments, empowering grid operators to
fine-tune dispatch strategies, issue curtailment orders, and optimize renewable energy utilization,
thereby ensuring a highly reliable grid service. Such meticulous monitoring is essential for
garnering public and private sector support, bolstering visibility, and fostering continued growth in
the solar rooftop sector in Bangladesh.

10
1 Introduction

1.1 Background of the study

The Government of Bangladesh (GoB) launched the development of the Renewable Energy
Sector through a progressive approach, enacting the "Renewable Energy Policy of Bangladesh,
2008." This policy aims to enhance the adoption of renewable energy (RE) technologies. The
GoB is driven by strategic goals such as ensuring energy security, fostering reliability and
availability of modern electricity, promoting environmental protection, supporting sustainable
development, ensuring social equity, addressing climate change mitigation, and addressing other
pertinent issues. Given the challenges of global warming and the dependence on fossil fuels,
there is a concerted effort to gradually replace existing conventional power generation capacities
with renewable alternatives. This shift is crucial for securing a stable and economically viable
energy supply. Notably, renewables particularly solar PV and wind energy, have experienced
significant growth worldwide over the last decade in terms of deployment, technological
advancements, and cost competitiveness, and are also slowly picking up in Bangladesh.

The country has emerged as a promising player in the renewable energy sector hosting the
world's largest solar home system program with over six million connections. However, since grid
electrification has been reported to reach the entire country, these systems are no longer the
people's primary energy supply option. Commercial & Residential (C&I) rooftop solar (RTS) has
experienced increased growth, accelerated by the energy price shocks in the aftermath of the
Russian invasion of the Ukraine. Most of the uptake to date is via a model where the C&I owner
invests into the assets and the engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) is handled by a
dedicated RTS provider, generally in South Asia referred to as CAPEX model. Less prevalent to
date is the OPEX model, where the RTS provider acts as an energy service company (ESCO)
and invests itself into the assets against designing of a power purchase agreement (PPA). A
graphical comparison of the two models is depicted under Figure 1.

11
Figure 1: Financing Model Comparison for RTS (Source: Author’s depiction)

When considering rooftop solar deployment, choosing between CAPEX and OPEX models
involves a careful evaluation of risks and benefits. The OPEX model, relying on third-party
providers, offers a more accessible entry point with reduced upfront costs. However, it comes with
drawbacks such as limited control and flexibility, as the system is owned and operated by an
external entity. Additionally, committing to a long-term financial agreement may pose risks, and
concerns about performance and efficiency could arise. At present, Bangladesh does not offer
tax incentives or subsidies for RTS. Nevertheless, implementing these kinds of incentives could
greatly accelerate the development of RTS projects in the nation.

On the other hand, the CAPEX model demands an initial investment, providing greater control
and ownership. Yet, uncertainties related to system performance and maintenance, as well as
potential financial risks, accompany this model. Regulatory and policy changes can impact the
returns for both CAPEX and OPEX models, introducing an element of unpredictability. Hence,
careful consideration of these factors is essential for stakeholders navigating the dynamic
landscape of rooftop solar investments. This report focuses on the OPEX modality.

Under these innovative OPEX-driven initiatives, the burden of upfront capital costs on the
government is significantly alleviated, paving the way for a greener, more sustainable future. A
As of January 2024, Bangladesh installed 1.2 GW worth of renewable energy, of which 1 GW is
solar (SREDA, 2024) It is expected that the RTS sector could experience exponential growth
with a much larger uptake of OPEX-based projects. However, there are still several bottlenecks
that prevent a larger uptake to date, such as uncertainty of future cash flow streams, long-term
12
roof integrity, trust in the ability and willingness to pay off the off-taker, complex access to local
debt and in combination with a foreign exchange crisis. These challenges are discussed in further
detail in this report, mitigation measures are being presented.

Furthermore, the objective of this report is to analyse the regulatory and economic enabling
environment of OPEX projects within the energy industry, focusing on Bangladesh and learning
from neighboring countries such as India, Vietnam, and China. The report ends by providing
select recommendations to public stakeholders, such as the Sustainable and Renewable Energy
Development Authority (SREDA), development partners, financiers, such as IDCOL, among
others.

1.2 What is rooftop solar (RTS)

RTS refers to the installation of solar photovoltaic (PV) panels on the rooftops of buildings or other
structures to harness solar energy and convert it into electricity. RTS can be categorized into: i)
residential small-scale solar systems (e.g., mini-grids, solar home systems), and ii) commercial
and industrial (C&I) solar installations on distribution buildings, manufacturing plants, industrial
estates, and retail stores. This report focuses on RTS for C&I purposes.

Figure 2: Annual global solar installations by system type (Source: PV Magazine, 2022)

13
Figure 3: C&I solar installations per continent (Source: PV Magazine, 2022)

In the past decade (see Figure 2), RTS grew remarkably globally, driven by a combination of
environmental awareness, favorable government policies, and advancements in technology. The
International Energy Agency (IEA) predicts a substantial increase in the global installed capacity
of rooftop solar, reaching 1,900 GWp by 2040, with China, the United States, and Europe leading
this expansion (IEA, 2020). This decentralized approach to energy generation has increased its
market penetration for its:

• environmental sustainability: By generating electricity from a renewable source, rooftop


solar helps reduce dependence on fossil fuels, mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and
combating climate change. According to the International Renewable Energy Agency
(IRENA), solar PV systems could avoid up to 4.6 gigatons of CO2 emissions globally by
2050 (IRENA, 2019). The ready-made garment (RMG) sector in Bangladesh represents
by far the strongest industry player, being responsible for more than 80% of the country’s
exports (Uddin, 2022). With over 200,000 industrial factories nationwide, including 7,000
Ready-Made Garment (RMG) factories, of which only 150 are LEED-certified, and a vast
untapped potential of 5,000MWp solar power achievable from industrial rooftops, along
with 42 million sq. ft of available solar rooftop space in the textile industry alone (GIZ-PEP,
2023). The RMG sector is strongly influenced by its buyers, majorly from Europe and the
US, who in turn have strong binding commitments for their net-zero strategies. The
pressure from the brands on the supply factories has recently been significantly increasing
to bring down their CO2 footprint as much as possible. This solution can potentially provide
greater self-sufficiency for C&I consumers. However, to meet global commitments, global

14
brands need to be able to avail corporate PPAs (C-PPAs) which are so far not considered
under the present rules and regulations (with a few exceptions).

• potential cost savings: RTS offers long-term cost savings. The decreasing cost of solar
panels and various government incentives have made solar energy more accessible to
homeowners and businesses. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) notes that the cost
of solar photovoltaic systems has dropped by about 70% over the past decade (Feldman
et al., 2023). The economics favouring solar uptake are based on the retail electricity price
versus the LCOE of RTS and the government incentives to incentivize renewables.

• flexible power supply: RTS energy storage has many benefits for businesses of different
sectors and sizes. The main ones are:

- Peak shaving: C&I energy storage can reduce the peak demand charges that
businesses pay to the grid operator by discharging stored energy during
periods of high electricity consumption. This can lower the electricity bills and
improve the profitability of the business.
- Energy arbitrage: C&I energy storage can take advantage of variable electricity
tariffs by charging the battery when electricity prices are low and discharging it
when prices are high. This can generate additional revenue for the business
and optimize its energy management.
- Renewable energy integration: C&I energy storage can increase the self-
consumption of renewable energy generated on-site, such as solar
photovoltaic (PV), by storing excess energy during periods of high generation
and using it during periods of low generation or high demand. This can reduce
the reliance on grid electricity, lower the carbon footprint and enhance the
sustainability of the business.
- Backup power: C&I energy storage can provide uninterrupted power supply
(UPS) to critical loads in case of grid outages or power quality issues. This can
ensure the continuity of operations, protect sensitive equipment and avoid
losses due to downtime.
- Grid services: C&I energy storage can provide various services to the grid
operator or utility, such as frequency regulation, voltage support, demand
response and congestion relief. This can improve the stability and reliability of
the grid, facilitate the integration of more renewable energy sources and create
new revenue streams for the business.
15
1.3 RTS characteristics based on type of energy off-taker and type of business model

1.3.1 Off-taker of energy

Governmental segment
Government organisations, whether directly or indirectly owned, exhibit a willingness to
incorporate renewable energy, particularly in newly established buildings with high electricity
consumption. These are prospective locations for Operational Expenditure (OPEX) projects due
to their usage of power-intensive appliances and systems. Initiatives by entities like the Power
Grid Company of Bangladesh (PGCB) and the Bangladesh Jute Mills Corporation (BJMC)
underscore the potential of utilizing rooftop spaces for solar parks, contributing over 90 MWp to
the national grid (Islam, 2023).

The Infrastructure Development Company Limited (IDCOL) plays a crucial role in financing
renewable infrastructure, having refinanced a large majority of the existing RTS installations.
IDCOL covers 80% of rooftop solar costs at a low interest rate of 5% - 5.5%. While the government
has revised policies to encourage increased stakes in domestic Independent Power Producers
(IPPs) for renewable projects, the focus extends to educational institutions. Despite recognizing
the solar potential in over 175,000 primary and secondary schools, real initiatives are yet to
materialize. Public-private partnerships with Energy Service Companies (ESCOs) are considered
suitable for government organizations, offering technical expertise and meeting project feasibility
requirements for OPEX. However, administrative complexities pose challenges to ESCO entities
in reaching the installation phase, impacting project timelines (Ayan & Pritha, 2021; TFE
Consulting GmbH, 2017).

Industrial segment
These are the biggest consumer facilities in the nation (primarily manufacturing facilities with
sufficient space up to 4,800 square meters and peak loads between 2 and 5 MWp, along with the
highest power per unit rate). The majority operate for 12 hours per day, six days per week.
Additionally, manufacturing companies that focus on exports frequently have regulatory
obligations for integrating renewable energy, making them ideal OPEX clients.

The Ready-Made Garment (RMG) industry is one of the largest industries and the largest exporter

for Bangladesh (80%), with over 4,000 factories operating across the country to produce world-
class apparel. RMG and textile factories have a combined roof space potential of over 5,000 MWp

16
of solar electricity (GIZ-PEP, 2023). Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters
Association (BGMEA), the trade association responsible for representing the garment industry,
has recently entered a deal to outfit the enlisted garment factories of Bangladesh with over 2 GWp
of solar rooftop systems, under both OPEX and CAPEX models. Under this initiative, the RMG
factories will have an annual generation of 2,600 GWh of solar electricity (The Business Standard,
2022).

Commercial segment
Many businesses are eager to use renewable energy and strive to run green or sustainable
operations. With moderate-to-heavy machinery and electrical systems like elevators, HVACs, and
servers (air conditioning is needed more when solar regeneration is higher), their operating times
are comparable to those of industrial systems. Additionally, tariffs are higher than for typical
homes.

Commercial buildings are mostly co-owned, and roof spaces are not as spacious, making the
OPEX installation process difficult. Billings are unsecured, and shifting tenants can drastically
reduce revenues. Also, for singular-user commercial buildings, CAPEX models might be more
feasible.

Economic Zones (EZs)


With 88 EZs currently and a government initiative to reach 100 EZs, the cumulative rooftop space
is projected to be around 650 square kilometers, presenting an extensive opportunity for solar
installations. EZs are expected to outpace other segments in energy usage, theoretically offering
a technical potential of up to 10 GWp of rooftop solar PV. The strategic advantage lies in the high
consumption rate of EZs, leading to a balanced consumption-to-export ratio. This equilibrium
opens the door for the implementation of long-term (20–25 year) rooftop solar projects. Notably,
the largest economic zone, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Shilpa Nagar, covering over 33,000
acres, plans to integrate various solar technologies, including floating solar on lakes, PV on
rooftops, and solar parks. The government's proactive measures to harness the 328 MWp solar
generation capacity of this economic zone further signify the commitment to sustainable energy
practices. Till date, a marginal aggregate of only 454 kW of solar panels has been installed in
different EZs run by BEPZA (BEPZA, 2023).

For these EZs, BEZA and BEPZA are the main responsible government authorities in charge.
These authorities also provide the electric power to the industries in these zones, effectively
becoming the DISCOMs for those zones. It is therefore important to consider BEZA, BEPZA and
other similar authorities in the same way as the DISCOMs for the solar rooftop rollout process,
17
e.g. through having them participate relevant stakeholder meetings and events and through
assigning them governmental targets of solar rooftop installations in the same way as official
targets for solar rooftop are in place for DISCOMs.

Although the potential for these EZs is high, the interest of BEZA and BEPZA in solar power so
far seems to depend on the initiative of individual officers at those authorities, as no official targets
or frameworks are in place here. Furthermore, BEZA and BEPZA are allowed to charge an
additional 15% on their electricity sales to their industry customers inside the EZs (compared to
normal tariffs in Bangladesh) so they can cover their costs for supplying electricity in these areas;
so with this guaranteed cashflow, they don’t have much of an incentive to explore other options
for power supply. Consequently, they also seem to so far have restricted the installation of NEM
in their zones (partly also based on concerns like land lease contracts). In order to bring these
authorities on board for solar rooftop, the above discussed “OPEX model” seems to be the easiest
option where they themselves to invest into solar and be part of the business. This option should
be discussed and implemented with BEPZA and the other authorities.

Another reason for the EZs being slow in implementing solar power is the unfavourable economic
situation worldwide since early 2022; the development in the EZs has been slow in general and
developed areas are lying idle.

Options for BEZA/BEPZA to implement solar rooftop in their EZs:

1. Grid export: The authority can install PV on its areas (including rooftops), invest itself and
sell to the grid through a negotiated tariff. This allows the authority to have a cashflow and
create revenue – however, it first has to negotiate a tariff with the respective DISCOM
which supposes time and the resulting tariff might be relatively low.
2. Individual solar: The authority can allow/encourage its local industry clients to go for solar
rooftop themselves – however, thereby losing its own revenues on electricity sales.
3. OPEX model: The authority can install PV on its areas (including rooftops) and sell the
electricity to its industry clients as part of its (already existing) electricity supply, allowing
for additional cashflow without relying on the DISCOMs and grid export. As the LCOE of
solar power is below the grid tariff, it can earn an additional margin (part of which would
be passed on to the client). The authority needs to ensure the investment (e.g. through
IDCOL) once for large quantities (MW) of solar power. It could also enter a PPP with a
private investor in order to reduce its own equity requirements and share or outsource the
technical responsibility and maintenance of the solar plants.

18
The OPEX model would therefore be an attractive option for BEZA/BEPZA to scale up solar power
in their Ezs.

Residential Housing
Regardless of holidays, energy is utilized continuously in this area throughout the day. However,
residential rooftops are mostly used by their tenants, and given that most residential buildings
have multiple tenants, there will be confusion in terms of the division of savings. Thus, a scarcity
of usable rooftop space areas coupled with issues of shadowed areas make solar energy
prospects challenging for residential housing.

1.3.2 Business models

There are a variety of business models that enable city governments, local businesses,
households, and large corporations to deploy rooftop solar. These business models have
emerged in response to a mix of factors, including price reductions in solar PV modules,
supportive incentives and policies, new digital technologies, and changes in consumer awareness
towards climate change. These models can be categorized as provided below:

Table 1: RTS business models


Business Description Remarks
Model
CAPEX • The entire investment for procurement, • Low transaction costs, lower payment
construction and commissioning of the risks and sole ownership of the rooftop
rooftop solar plant is borne upfront by plant
the power consumer
• However, requirement of upfront
• The consumer hires a solar EPC capital, high interest rates on the
company, which provides turnkey money borrowed, are few of the
installation of the entire solar power challenges in implementing this model.
system. In addition, the EPC player
may also carry out annual operation
and maintenance (O&M) of the plant on
mutually agreed commercial terms
OPEX (or • An investor or project developer (also • The technological risk is mitigated by
RESCO) called Renewable Energy Service choosing a qualified RESCO, capable
Company – RESCO) invests the of ensuring performance guarantee of
upfront capital expenditure for setting the rooftop solar plant
up the rooftop plant and sells energy to
the consumer at a per unit price under • Prevents customers from locking up
a PPA. significant capital in terms of upfront
investments.
• The terms and conditions (such as
tenure, tariff) of the power purchase are • A major disadvantage of this model is
governed by a power purchase payment risks because the long-term
agreement signed between RESCO PPAs signed between RESCO and
19
Business Description Remarks
Model
and the consumer. consumers generally lack provision of
termination compensation. Due to this,
consumer is not legally bound to
remain in the contract
Lease • In this model, the customer leases the • Prevents customers from locking up
model system from a developer and pays a significant capital in terms of upfront
rental amount over time. The model of investments and will help in meeting
lease may be either a financial lease or their short-term financial demands
an operating lease.
• The lease model is not popular in India
• At the end of the lease tenure, the asset because of limited tax benefits
is fully transferred to the customer. available to lessors and thus reduced
returns to equity.
• Other risks involved in this business
model are payment default issues and
ownership issues

Aggregator • Under this model, the third party/ • Helps the aggregator to gain scale and
model RESCO, aggregates the demand of offer resulting in low transaction cost.
various consumers and installs rooftop Financial institutions save considerable
solar captive power plants up to the time and resources.
total capacity of the cumulative
• To gain a complete line of credit for
contracted load of the selected group of
rooftop financing, developers
customers connected with the same
aggregate the portfolio of projects so
distribution transformer.
that the project financing cost can be
• This model is now picking up pace in significantly reduced. Hence, the end
India and has been tried by various consumer is offered competitive tariffs.
DISCOMs and banks.
• This model assists in better risk
management due to lower risk of
project failure arising from any one
individual buyer.

2 RTS OPEX models

2.1 Characteristics of the OPEX model

Globally, RTS energy businesses have followed two broad routes for development. The first route
has been focused on consumers, who develop small decentralized distributed solar projects,
mostly on their rooftops. Such small projects range from a few kilowatts to megawatts in case of
industry and commercial (C&I) consumers, and are developed under facilitating policy and
regulatory framework, with the role of utility being limited to granting permissions and facilitating
interconnection with the grid. Facilitative policies, incentives, tax rebates, capital subsidies, feed-
in tariffs and net metering have been key drivers of such business models. Customer-focused

20
routes — or business models — can also involve a third-party, rooftop developer, known as a
RESCO (Rooftop Energy Service Company). RESCOs often facilitate financing for the systems
they install, service and maintain on behalf of the consumers, against payment for energy
generation.

A second route for decentralized solar energy involves direct involvement by the utility, which
plays an active role in developing rooftop solar projects, including investment, facilitation, or
development with third-party developers. Utilities have an inherent advantage because they act
as the interface between the customer and the grid. Declining cost of solar and simultaneous
increase in the costs of conventional power has resulted in an increased interest in decentralized
distributed solar models from utilities. Table 2 summarizes both customer-centric and utility-
centric business models.

Table 2: Customer-centric and utility-centric business models (Source: PACE-D, 2023)

Utility-focused solar business models Customer-focused solar business models

Utility-owned, on customer or utility premises Consumer (rooftop owner)-owned (CAPEX)

Community-owned and utility-facilitated RESCO (third-party)-owned (OPEX)

Utility-financed

The operating costs model, often known as the OPEX model, is a scheme in which the developer
owns the solar project, and the consumer just pays for the energy produced. The OPEX model
requires users to commit to a long-term, legally enforceable agreement for the roof on which the
solar system is installed. In addition, they must sign a long-term Power Purchase Agreement
(PPA) for the supply of power. The PPAs can last for a period of up to 25 years, with the consumer
agreeing to pay a predetermined rate over that time. Any extra electricity produced can be fed
into the grid. In this arrangement, the developer is responsible for all capital costs and risks. The
developer owns the system for the rest of its life and is responsible for its operation and
maintenance throughout its lifetime. A major advantage of the OPEX approach is that it allows
the consumer to go solar without a huge upfront expenditure (Mercom, 2020).

The OPEX model is appropriate for individual consumers who are skeptical about making long-
term capital investments in technology they have less understanding about. After a five-year trial
period, they can choose to exercise the buy-back provision on their PPAs. It is also ideal for
21
smaller companies aiming to meet their green goals as they expand. Depending on the tariffs set
by their various state distribution firms (DISCOMs), they can save roughly 30-40% on their
electricity bills (ISR, 2021).

However, not all installers may be willing to offer rooftop installations in the 5 kWp range using
the OPEX model. To make it profitable, they’ll need a minimum capacity of 500 kWp or more. As
a result, the commercial and industrial (C&I) sector is the key consumer for developers.
Ownership of the rooftop project will be transferred to the consumer once the PPA expires.
Companies, on the other hand, incorporate a clause that allows them to acquire back the project
before the PPA expires. This permits the consumer to return the product to the creator at a
predetermined rate after five years.

22
2.2 Step by Step Process Diagram of an OPEX model

Figure 4: Step by step process diagram of an OPEX model

23
2.3 RTS in Bangladesh: Current market and trends

In recent years, Bangladesh has witnessed a significant surge in the adoption of RTS energy
solutions, driven by a combination of factors such as increasing energy demand, cost of energy,
environmental concerns, and load shedding which causes frequent power outages. This shift
towards solar energy is particularly prominent in the C&I sector, where businesses are
recognizing the economic and environmental benefits of rooftop solar installations. The solar
energy market in Bangladesh is expected to grow from 0.4 GWp in 2023 to 2.05 GWp by 2028,
at a CAGR of 38.60% during the forecast period (2023-2028) as shown in Figure 5 (Mordor
Intelligence, 2023):

Figure 5: Expected growth of the solar energy market in Bangladesh (Source: Mordor
Intelligence, 2023)

The market experienced adverse effects from the COVID-19 outbreak, characterized by regional
lockdowns and disruptions in ongoing and upcoming projects. However, it has recovered to levels
comparable to those before the pandemic. Bangladesh has set an ambitious target to install over
4,100 MW of electricity from renewable sources by 2030 (Hasan & Rahman, 2021). About half of
this power is expected to come from solar energy, presenting a substantial opportunity for the
country's solar energy market. According to the International Renewable Energy Agency,
Bangladesh's solar PV capacity reached approximately 537 MWp in 2022, marking an increase
from 480 MWp in 2021 (IRENA, 2023; Mordor Intelligence, 2023). And in 2023, Bangladesh

24
approved over 1.5 GW of solar installation projects (PV Magazine, 2023). This growth was driven
by significant deployments of solar PV installations in the country, especially in utility projects.
The Ministry of Energy and Power in Bangladesh aims to further increase the installed capacity
of solar PV by 2023.

Figure 6: Growth of PV installations in Bangladesh

Both governmental authorities and public sector utilities acknowledge the significance of RTS in
the country's energy mix. Solar energy is gaining attention as the country shifts its energy mix
away from natural gas, given shortages. Despite discussions surrounding the implementation of
a policy for RTS, there is currently a lack of it. While the Bangladesh Energy Regulatory
Commission (BERC) has shown interest in RTS by releasing a draft policy guideline in March
2017 titled 'Terms and Conditions for Determination of RE Tariff,' it primarily focuses on a net
metering framework (TFE Consulting GmbH, 2017). The draft outlines details such as capacity
limits, system types, and associated costs but does not include a tariff for excess energy injected
into the grid (see Table 3). Instead, it establishes a methodology and parameters for determining
a potential tariff in the future. Consequently, the draft does not offer clear guidance to market
participants on the direction of net metering support and lacks any indication of potential power
evacuation compensation, which could serve as an additional revenue stream for C&I customers.

25
Table 3: Regulation parameters for PV systems

Parameter Applicable Regulation Implications / Comments


Capacity Limits Applicable to rooftop and land-based Different capacity limits are
systems of less than 1 MW (AC)
required since rooftop solar system
classified into two categories:
costs are extremely sensitive to
1. Less than 10kW
scale.
2. Between 10kW and 1 MW
Capacity Utilization 18% Indicates the quantum of energy
Factor generated by the system.
Approved System BDT 130,000 per kWp (less than 10 Actual system prices can be much
Price kWp) lesser than these indicative prices. On
BDT 120,000 per kWp (Between 10 ground discussions indicate that
kWp and 1 MWp) prices are closer to BDT 70,000 per
kWp
Normative Operation 1.4% of capital cost (annually) This number is highly specific. Remote
and Maintenance sites tend to have higher service costs
Expenses compared to urban locations.

Net Metering is a billing arrangement/ policy that gained popularity in 2018 following the
introduction of the Net Metering Guidelines in July of that year (Net Metering Guidelines, 2018).
This also boosted the installation of industrial rooftop solar systems on a large scale. This
technology enables prosumers to earn credits in the form of energy or money by connecting their
renewable energy sources to distribution grids. CAPEX and OPEX are the two financing models
that are currently being offered in Bangladesh. The government of Bangladesh faced challenges
in increasing the share of renewable energy for limited space for large-scale renewable energy
power facilities. However, net metering emerged as a pivotal measure to alleviate this challenge.

Figure 7: Bangladesh Solar System overview

26
In 2021, the chairman of SREDA announced 500 MWp of rooftop solar projects for industrial and
commercial establishments powered by the net metering system and solar parks with over 1,000
MWp capacity to be in operation soon (The Daily Star, 2022).

In October 2023, the Bangladesh government mandated the installation of net-metered solar
systems in newly constructed residential, educational, medical, industrial, and commercial
buildings as a prerequisite for new grid connections. This move is expected to increase rooftop
PV generation in the country (Islam, 2023). There is also a growing interest among industry
owners, small to large scales, of installing solar projects on the rooftops of their factories,
especially garments, textiles, and jute mills considering their cost-effectiveness (Khan, 2023).

With a focus on the C&I sector consumer segment, the RTS market in Bangladesh can be
categorized into three types of consumers: government, industrial, and commercial (TFE
Consulting GmbH, 2017).

Figure 8: Market segmentation Bangladesh

Government
The government plays a pivotal role as a substantial demand source in the current early stage of
the market. The government's interest in implementing rooftop solar on various structures,
including electrical substations, university rooftops, and offices. The primary motivation behind
these initiatives was to contribute to the country's objective of achieving 10% of electricity
generation from renewable sources by 2021 (Nabi, 2019). Additionally, the government aims to
enhance the familiarity of government officials and public utilities with solar PV and catalyze the
development of a rooftop solar Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) and financing
[Link] evaluating this segment, the load factor is not a significant consideration. This is
attributed to the fact that, for government projects, a utility entity typically procures the energy for
27
integration into its electricity system. The government building itself does not directly consume
the generated power, and consequently, is not billed for it. This operational model mandates that
all government projects be situated in proximity to a high-voltage power evacuation line owned
by a utility such as DPDC. As the DPDC procures the electricity, the entirety of the energy
generated by rooftop systems installed on government buildings can be fully utilized. Therefore,
in this specific segment, load considerations do not impact the sizing of the systems.

Industrial
Industrial consumers, particularly manufacturing industries, are pivotal to Bangladesh's economy,
contributing nearly 20% to the GDP (The World Bank, 2023). This sector, with its demand for
cost-effective and uninterrupted electricity, currently propels the rooftop solar market in the
country. Noteworthy industrial segments include large textile manufacturers, other large
manufacturers (such as glass and ceramics), medium manufacturers (including ready-made
garments and battery manufacturing), and small industries (e.g., poultry and agro-processing
companies). The diversity of economic activity (length of operations, load profile) in this segment
influences the total capacity installed, rooftop layouts, and system design.

Commercial
This category typically comprises offices, malls, and shopping areas, with electricity loads often
exceeding 1 MWh. In developing countries like India, RTS for the same type of consumers range
between 100-200 kWh. However, market insights indicate that the level of commercial
development in Bangladesh is comparatively lower than in India. Consequently, only a limited
number of commercial buildings are suitable for rooftop solar installation.

Moreover, due to the high population density and limited land availability, commercial buildings in
Bangladesh tend to have smaller areas, resulting in roof spaces more suitable for solar systems
ranging from 10-20 kWp. According to feedback from EPC companies, this makes the commercial
segment less attractive to them, leading to a lack of noteworthy market activity in this area.

2.4 Stakeholders and Regulatory Setup

2.4.1 Stakeholders

The key stakeholders for rooftop solar in Bangladesh include:

Industrial Consumers
These are the driving force behind the exploration of rooftop solar systems, particularly in the size
range of 100-1,000 kWp. Described as 'early adopters,' industrial players aim to maximize roof
28
space to mitigate the impact of power cuts and rising grid electricity costs. Their interest lies in
reducing energy expenses and enhancing supply security.

EPC Companies
A small but emerging EPC ecosystem is playing a crucial role in implementing rooftop solar
installations in Bangladesh. These companies are technically competent, have executed high-
quality installations, and present financially attractive proposals to potential customers. They are
instrumental in advancing the adoption of rooftop solar.

Infrastructure Development Company Limited (IDCOL)


IDCOL plays a key role in facilitating the rooftop solar market by bringing together installers and
customers. Despite not being explicitly mandated for such activities, IDCOL representatives assist
companies with quick pre-feasibility checks and promote their financial lending terms to potential
customers.

Government Stakeholders
The Power Division, Ministry of Power, Bangladesh, Sustainable and Renewable Energy
Development Authority (SREDA), and Dhaka Power Distribution Company Limited (DPDC),
Bangladesh Rural Electrificaiton Board (BREB), Dhaka Electric Supply Company (DESCO),
Bangladesh Power Devcelopment Board (BPDB), West Zone Power Development Company
(WZPDCL) are government entities involved. Despite government support, the process of
finalizing rooftop solar policies is slow due to concerns about the relatively high cost of solar PV
electricity compared to current utility power procurement rates.

These stakeholders, including industrial consumers, EPC companies, and IDCOL, and
Government Stakeholders express confidence in the growth potential of rooftop solar in
Bangladesh. They emphasize the necessity of policy support to expedite adoption and fully realize
the market's potential.

Development Partners
Development partners like the Asian Development Bank (ADB), World Bank, GIZ (German
Agency for International Cooperation), and JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency) are
playing a pivotal role in advancing rooftop solar initiatives in Bangladesh to expedite infrastructure
development projects. Recognizing the importance of sustainable and clean energy sources,
these organizations are collaborating with the Bangladeshi government and local stakeholders to
promote the widespread adoption of rooftop solar technology. Their support includes financial
assistance, technical expertise, and capacity building programs aimed at enhancing the country's

29
ability to implement and manage solar projects. One notable example is the G310 Project
Development Programme (PDP) by GIZ, which is part of the German Energy Solutions Initiative.
The PDP specifically aims to promote the use of rooftop solar in Bangladesh by providing
technical support to humanitarian agencies for renewable energy exploration, including feasibility
studies and project development. Moreover, the PDP actively participates in the selection of
suitable contractors to ensure the effective implementation of rooftop solar projects, contributing
significantly to Bangladesh's sustainable and resilient future.

2.4.2 Regulatory Setup

The regulatory setup for the Rooftop Solar sector in Bangladesh faces significant challenges.
Policies primarily originate from top-level authorities, but there is a noticeable gap between
policymakers and industry stakeholders, including professionals, producers, consumers, and
engineers. Limited citizen involvement in rural areas, coupled with a lack of consideration for
diverse viewpoints during policy formulation, contributes to the existing constraints. Policymakers
often perceive renewable energy, particularly solar, as intermittent and not a significant
alternative.

The 2018 introduction of a net metering policy aimed to encourage energy contribution to the grid,
but the lack of specific guidelines for different projects has impeded widespread adoption. Despite
a 2010 mandate for solar panels on all buildings, the initiative faced challenges like low
awareness, leading to the installation of low-quality panels. The current grid setup is not
conducive to various renewable energy solutions, and outdated infrastructure hampers the
integration of variable renewable energy. Many remote areas lack grid access, excluding captive
power plants from net metering benefits.

Although Bangladesh aspires to achieve 40% of its electricity from renewables by 2041, it has
already been falling short of this 10% target by 2020, scratching only the 3% mark (The Daily
Star, 2023). Land scarcity and with that a limited potential for utility-scale solar is often made the
main culprit. The current shift toward rooftop solar in the C&I sector is a promising development,
coupled with a very promising Renewable Energy Policy 2023 draft, as issued by SREDA on Nov
20, [Link]/ once implemented, this could/ will be a key enabler for a larger uptake of renewables
in Bangladesh in general.

Foreign companies express interest, but they encounter obstacles due to evolving regulations
and the need for clear guidelines. The government provides incentives such as waived import
duties and VAT exemptions for solar-related goods, especially for registered Solar Panel

30
Manufacturing Plants. Bangladesh Bank supports solar projects through refinancing schemes and
a fund for technological development.

Challenges persist, including the high initial investment, limited information, and public
awareness, technical knowledge gaps, and regulatory uncertainties. The use of low-quality panel
modules further impacts the durability and efficiency of installed solar panels. Addressing these
challenges is crucial for enhancing the effectiveness of solar panel systems in Bangladesh.

3. Challenges of the OPEX Model and Potential Risk Mitigation

3.1 Challenges of the OPEX model

Uncertainty in Revenue Streams


The revenue streams from renewable energy projects can be uncertain, at least in a nascent
market with little to no historical data, as they are dependent on factors such as the weather and
the price of electricity. This can make it difficult for developers to predict their future cash flows
and make informed investment decisions. Moreover, the usual PPA (Power Purchase Agreement)
term is 20 years which exposes the ESCO company to several risks such as payment risk,
bankruptcy risk, etc. as cash flow management is extremely critical.

Foreign Exchange Risk


Many of the components used in renewable energy projects in Bangladesh are imported from
foreign countries, which exposes developers to foreign exchange risk. This can increase the cost
of projects and make it more difficult to predict their profitability. Additionally, the current inflation
rates coupled with the rapid currency devaluation trends in the domestic economy pose a threat
to commissioning solar OPEX projects by destabilizing project budgets. Moreover, financing
through foreign loans is not a feasible option given the return on investment (ROI) for the service
provider comes in Bangladeshi Taka (BDT) which has historically devalued considerably against
the USD.

Lack of access to finance: Bangladesh's renewable energy developers face challenges in


obtaining financing from conventional lenders. This is caused by several things, such as the
unpredictability of revenue streams, and the lack of collateral. Moreover, the weak Taka makes
borrowing in FOREX extremely risky. As the Bangladesh Bank is providing the Taka an artificial
floor price, and faces increasing pressure to stabilize the Taka, significant devaluation can be
expected in 2024. Since PPAs are not available in US$, the only option for debt financing is in
local currency.

31
Access to Local Debt
Private organizations such as ESCOs and EPCs find it difficult to satisfy the financial institutions'
requirements when it comes to domestic funding choices. One of the main lenders of solar
installations, for example, is IDCOL, which offers financing facilities that cover 80% of the
installation costs. But to meet IDCOL's lending requirements, borrowers must secure the loan
amount by giving IDCOL collateral in the form of a bank guarantee, land mortgage, or lien on
FDR. The bulk of private companies in the energy sector, however, lack land that may be
mortgaged to IDCOL, whilst bank guarantees, often at 100% margin, come with costs because
the guarantor banks need to pay quarterly margin fees. For most commercial service providers,
it is not practical to supply such collateral for every project during the quick rollout of OPEX
projects. Also, the process of obtaining a loan can easily take nine months, which means that the
project financing often has to be upfronted, and then the IDCOL loan might be rolled over for
consecutive projects.

The Bangladesh Bank's refinancing initiatives, which offer refinancing for financial institutions to
provide loans for green projects at comparatively lower interest rates than the commercial banks,
are another important domestic financing option for solar OPEX in Bangladesh. After that, ESCOs
receive funding from financial institutions to start eco-friendly projects. The refinancing plan
presents a hurdle because it necessitates Bangladesh Bank's approval of the borrower's project.
Therefore, a borrower runs the risk of the project's failure to materialize if they obtain funding from
a financial institution under the program but their project is rejected. Also, comparing the
refinancing plan to standard finance, however, various bureaucratic problems, such as the
channeling through commercial banks that prefer to finance larger and simpler energy efficiency
projects, have led to almost no deployment.

High Tax, VAT & Customs Duty


Solar OPEX providers have to import the items at a high tax rate which makes it difficult to manage
capital expenditures. Unlike the IPPs who benefit from exemption as their business relationship
is through a governmental PPA, rooftop solar projects do not have access to or incentives of
capital benefits, customs exemption, or tax holidays spanning up to 15 years, thus rendering it
expensive and its prospects less lucrative.

US Dollar Crisis and L/C Opening Issues


The persisting dollar crisis on one hand influences the possibility of securing foreign loans and on
the other exerts an impact on the initiation of Letters of Credit (L/C), consequently impeding the
process of importing essential equipment and components for renewable energy projects,

32
notwithstanding the availability of sufficient funds in the local currency. Effectively, at present an
EPC needs to bring one USD into the country before being able to open an LC worth one USD.

Roof Integrity Concerns


One of the significant challenges associated with the OPEX model of rooftop solar in Bangladesh
revolves around uncertainties regarding roof integrity. Assessing whether a roof will remain
structurally sound and unchanged for the typical lifespan of a solar installation, which often spans
20 years or more, poses a considerable hurdle. In the event that a roof does require replacement
or repair within this timeframe, additional deinstallation and reinstallation costs become a pressing
concern. Moreover, even with legal indemnification clauses in place, the potential for leaks or
damages to the roof can lead to disputes between solar service providers and property owners.
These disputes not only entail financial implications but also raise questions about the practicality
and effectiveness of long-term solar leasing agreements, necessitating careful consideration and
risk mitigation strategies for both parties involved in the OPEX model.

Limited Scope-3 Emission Reduction Potential


Reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions within supply chains is increasingly pivotal in the
sourcing strategies of global fashion brands. The proliferation of renewable energy technologies,
especially (RTS), plays a crucial role in decarbonization efforts, thereby bolstering the
competitiveness of Bangladesh's essential Ready-Made Garments (RMG) sector. Yet, even with
a surge in RTS installations at supply factories, these brands may struggle to fulfill their global
commitments for reducing scope 3 emissions. Corporate Power Purchase Agreements (C-PPAs)
emerge as a potential solution: C-PPAs involve an agreement between a business and a
renewable energy generator, wherein the business commits to purchasing a designated amount
of electricity at a fixed price over a set period – however, contrary to establishing a PPA project
on the off-taker’s premises, the energy is generated at another location and routed to the off-taker
via the existing grid (“wheeling”). This arrangement offers businesses a reliable energy supply
while concurrently diminishing their carbon footprint and advancing the nation's sustainable
development objectives, while eliminating the space limitation on the off-taker’s site premises.
Regrettably, the current net metering policy overlooks the possibility of incorporating C-PPAs and
wheeling, while in principle part of the original Renewable Energy Policy, has not yet been
implemented, mostly due to the concerns of the DISCOMs.

Data availability
Currently, technical data availability on solar rooftop is very low in Bangladesh. There is a list of
all approved rooftop plants on the SREDA website, but there is no performance data or even an

33
updated registry of plants still in operation. Local solar irradiation measurement data to estimate
the output of a plant in a certain location is not available; the only available datasets are satellite
data. For the electric grids, granular and real-time data, such as grid outages, grid voltage, grid
frequency, and reactive power injection are not available or hard to achieve from DISCOMs. All
of this hampers a standardized, informed decision-making from an investor’s point of view or
makes it impossible to benchmark projects between different suppliers.

3.2 Risk Mitigation

Uncertainty in Revenue Streams


Revenue streams should be diversified through the use of Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs)
with fixed tariffs. Hedging strategies concerning foreign currency should be implemented to
minimize the impact of market volatility. Furthermore, it is recommended that bank guarantees,
spanning 12 months of electricity bills, be demanded to mitigate this risk concerning off-takers.
When it comes to OPEX projects, government entities, as off-takers, can easily comply with the
National Net Metering Regulations like the Tripartite Power Purchase Agreement (PPA). A
Tripartite PPA involves three parties—the power producer, the power purchaser, and a
government entity or regulatory body—providing a framework for renewable energy projects with
added assurances and support mechanisms. However, the case is different for private off-takers.
For private off-takers, the practice of these tripartite agreements and selling bulk electricity to the
REB upon failure of payment is not as effective as it is for the government off-takers. This creates
a compliance risk for the private entities with OPEX projects on the ground. Therefore, a specified
and clarified set of directions needs to be set in this regard, tailored for private off-takers.

Access to Local Debt


It might be necessary to finance first projects with 100% equity to create a track-record and in
parallel pursue local debt which can then be used to finance consecutive projects. This approach
requires careful cash flow management.

Foreign Exchange Risk


Diversification of equipment and component suppliers is necessary to reduce reliance on a single
currency if possible. Foreign currency hedging options should be explored to mitigate exchange
rate risk. A foreign currency reserve should be maintained to cover short-term currency
fluctuations.

34
Tax Exemption
Engaging in discussions with relevant authorities like SREDA, NBR, etc. to explore potential tax
exemption for renewable energy projects is crucial. Tax considerations should be included in
financial modeling to accurately assess project costs.

US Dollar Crisis and L/C Opening Issues


Diversification of sources for equipment and components to reduce reliance on a single currency
is advisable. This can be achieved by establishing partnerships with multiple suppliers across
diverse regions, mitigating the impact of currency fluctuations on procurement costs. Exploration
of alternative trade financing options, such as trade credit insurance and export financing, is
necessary. Companies can actively seek out partnerships with financial institutions specializing
in renewable energy projects to secure favorable trade credit insurance terms. Additionally,
engaging in discussions with both financial institutions and regulators to address concerns related
to Letter of Credit (L/C) availability is essential. Proactive measures, such as negotiating flexible
L/C terms or exploring digital and blockchain-based financing solutions, can streamline
transaction processes. By implementing these practical and targeted risk mitigation strategies,
the renewable energy sector in Bangladesh can navigate the intricate financial landscape with
greater agility, enhancing the resilience of projects and ensuring their long-term success and
sustainability.

Data availability
To fortify the monitoring and enhance the data-driven financial forecasting capabilities and quality
assurance of solar rooftop implementations in Bangladesh, it is imperative to establish a robust
system. The recent advancements in the solar rooftop sector have laid the foundation for
significant progress. This solution encompasses real-time project yield tracking and
benchmarking, aggregate tracking of national renewable energy impact and emission savings, as
well as smart features for stable grid operation. Currently operational in a testing environment
across the country, the implementation is closely monitored by the Sustainable and Renewable
Energy Development Authority (SREDA), which acts as the central regulatory entity holding
project owners accountable for data availability. The initial data collection focuses on daily yield
and hourly average generation power. The expansion of the program to include more granular
and real-time data, such as grid voltage, grid frequency, and reactive power injection, will
contribute to a dynamic national database. This comprehensive dataset enables more detailed
grid stability assessments, empowering grid operators to fine-tune dispatch strategies, issue
curtailment orders, and optimize renewable energy utilization, thereby ensuring a highly reliable

35
grid service. Such meticulous monitoring is essential for garnering public and private sector
support, bolstering visibility, and fostering continued growth in the solar rooftop sector in
Bangladesh.

4 RTS environment in selected countries

4.1 RTS market and trends

4.1.1 India

RTS is an important market segment of India’s solar sector. It comprises on-site solar installations
connected in a behind-the-meter (BTM) configuration on the consumer’s premises. It provides
buyers a viable option to green their electricity consumption by procuring on-site cheaper and
cleaner renewable energy. According to the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE), as
of July 2023, the cumulative installed capacity of rooftop solar in India was 10.9 gigawatts (GWp).
This represents a share of around 15% of the total solar installations in India. Until fiscal year (FY)
2019, RTS in India was only 1.8 GWp. Since then, the RTS market has consistently grown by
around 1.9-2.2 GWp annually. According to industry estimates, FY2024 will see the largest
installations to date of about 4 GWp. Out of this, 2 GWp has already been installed between April
and July 2023. States like Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, and the union territory of Delhi,
have the most favorable ecosystems for setting up rooftop solar projects. Conducive net metering
policies, ease of regulatory approvals, and potential monetary savings that a C&I consumer can
realize by adopting rooftop solar influence a state's attractiveness. States like Tamil Nadu and
Uttar Pradesh continue to discourage their high-paying C&I consumers from shifting to rooftop
solar-based solutions.

In terms of consumer segments, commercial and industrial (C&I) consumers added the bulk
(~66%) of rooftop solar capacity in India. The other 34% of rooftop solar installations are in
residential and government buildings. The lack of consumer awareness, the dearth of suitable
financing options, and regulatory issues around net metering have hindered the uptake of rooftop
solar in the residential segment. Regarding the split by different business models, the capital
expenditure (CAPEX) model is more prevalent, with around 70% additions. The primary reasons
for the smaller operating expenditure (OPEX) share are the substantial contractual and payment
risks that project developers encounter because of a lack of creditworthy C&I consumers.

As part of India’s overarching National Solar Mission, the government envisioned the installation
of 100 GWp of solar capacity by 2022. Out of this, 40 GWp was assigned to rooftop solar. To
36
achieve the 40 GWp target, the central government launched two phases (in 2015 and 2019) of
the Grid-Connected Rooftop and Small Solar Power Plants Programme. The program provided
incentives through central financial assistance (CFA) to install rooftop solar plants. Despite the
government’s efforts, by the end of 2022, only 8.1 GWp had been installed, according to data
from the MNRE. The prevailing practices of RTS implementation is observed to be complex,
repetitive, tedious, and time-consuming for potential consumers and there is a lack of coordination
among implementing agencies. Therefore, even with vast potential, supportive measures,
dedicated policies, and regulations the penetration of RTS systems is far below their respective
potential. This massive shortfall (around 80%) in the target forced the MNRE to extend the timeline
of Phase-ll of the program by more than three years to March 2026.

Figure 9: State-wise share rooftop solar installations (as of July 2023) (Source: Gulia et al.,
2023)

4.1.2 Vietnam

By the end of 2022, around 19.38 GWp of solar generation capacity has been installed in Vietnam.
RTS has been the rising star which has seen a skyrocketing increase of installations in 2020
before a deadline for the FITs scheme, with a total capacity of 9.73 GWp installed by the end of
December 2020. RTS installations grew by more than 25 times, rising from the capacity of 378
MWp at the end of 2019 and spread across almost 105,000 RTS systems throughout 2020.

37
In terms of average capacity size of RTS systems by sector, the industrial sector has the biggest
size of 482 KWp/system, 4.6 times bigger than the commercial size (105 KWp/system), 3.5 times
bigger than the administrative sector (137 KWp/system) and 30 times bigger than the household
sector (16 KWp/system). The administrative sector includes Hospital, Nursery, Kindergartens,
Schools, Public buildings, and public lighting and has an average capacity of 137 KWp/system.
There is no specific data on the number of systems and total capacity for schools.

Figure 10: RTS capacity by customer segment until Dec 2020 (Source: UNICEF, 2022)

The exploding growth of the solar power sector, including the rooftop solar segment, has put
significant strain on the national distribution network because the existing network cannot absorb
such a sharp increase in electricity generated by solar energy. As a result, there has been forced
electricity output cut due to an overloaded transmission system. For example, the solar output of
some major solar plants in the central and southern regions was cut by up to 50% during the long
Tet holiday, otherwise known as the Vietnamese New Year holiday, causing a loss of VND200-
250 million per day. In the same way, many rooftops solar owners were forced to cut output by
as much as 80%, which was a drastic cut. Other than the overheating development of solar power
that outpaces the limited transmission capacity, the solar power sector is also faced with other
obstacles including uncertainty of legal framework, non-bankability of the Power Purchase
Agreement due to EVN’s monopoly, lengthy and complicated investment procedure, and limited
access to project financing.

On May 15, 2023, the Prime Minister of Vietnam finally approved the National Power
Development Plan VIII (PDP 8) for the period of 2021–2030, with a vision to 2050. Solar capacity
targets until 2030 account for a total of 12.84 GW and until 2050 to 189.3 GW. All RE targets are
subject to funding provision under the Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP) agreement with
the International Partners Group (IPG) entered on December 14, 2022. The PDP 8 further

38
includes a 50% target by 2030 for rooftop solar self-consumption for residential and office
buildings.

4.1.3 China

In 2022, China’s newly installed PV capacity exceeded 87.4 GWp, an increase of 59.3% year-on-
year. New solar installations reached a new record high, becoming the largest and fastest-growing
power source in terms of new installations. From the amount of installed capacity, it is evident
that the rate of new PV installations in China continues to accelerate. By the end of 2022, the
cumulative PV capacity reached 392.6 GWp, close to the 400 GWp milestone, becoming the third
largest installed power source. In 2022, PV annual power generation reached 425 TWh,
exceeding 400 TWh for the first time, and added about 100 TWh of new power generation. This
accounted for 30% of all new power generation (REGlobal, 2023). In April 2023, the National
Energy Administration issued the “Guidance on Energy Work in 2023”, guiding the deployment of
energy work in addition to development targets. The document highlights a 160 GW target for the
annual installed capacity of solar and wind for 2023, with the share of electricity generated by
solar and wind power reaching 15.3% of the country’s total electricity consumption.

In 2022, centralized PV installed capacity reached 36.3 GWp, accounting for 41.5% of all
installations. The distributed PV annual installed capacity hit 51.1 GW, providing the remaining
58.5% share. Distributed PV has, thus, become the main driver behind the country’s newly
installed PV capacity. The residential segment installed 25.3 GWp, accounting for 49.4% of
installations, while the C&I segment added 25.9 GWp, accounting for 50.6% of installations.
Residential installations grew by 17.3% from 2021.

39
Figure 11: Cumulative solar PV installed capacity by Province (GW) 2021 (GIZ, 2022)

China’s 2022 PV market was well-balanced, and each market segment – centralized, C&I, and
residential – accounted for about one-third of the total market.

2022 marked the installation of the world’s largest commercial & industrial rooftop solar PV plant
in China. The newly completed rooftop solar project stretches across 43 rooftops with a total
capacity of 120 MWp, generating as much as 110 GWh per year – powering the industrial park
itself but also feeding excess electricity into the grid.

40
Figure 12: China PV market scenarios 2023 – 2030 (Source: CPIA, 2023)

Figure 13: World's largest C&I installation, Jining, Shandong, China (Source: Hill, 2021)

41
4.2 Stakeholders and regulatory environment

4.2.1 India

In India, the RTS regulations and factors vary widely across states. There are few states where
the attractiveness across influencing parameters is favourable for rooftop solar market growth.

• Gujarat, Delhi, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have the most favourable ecosystems
for setting up C&I rooftop solar projects. In Maharashtra, due to its high grid tariffs for
C&I consumers, cost savings will be highest by adopting rooftop solar. However, its
unfavorable regulations when it comes to approvals and net metering restrictions
negate some of the favourable parameters.
• Some states do not provide compensation for excess injection of solar electricity into
the grid, while in others, the surplus injection compensation is not attractive enough.
Compensation is very low compared to the current corporate power purchase
agreement (PPA) rates of around US¢6/kWh.
• Even the implementation of net metering has been slow, and some states set arbitrary
constraints and limits. For example, some states do not allow net metering for high
voltage power consumers, i.e., large off-takers of power.
• In most states, there is a cap on the size of the solar plant linked to the distribution
transformer's capacity or connected load capacity under net metering.
• Karnataka has revised its period of compensation for surplus electricity from annual to
monthly, even though most other major states currently have an annual compensation
period for surplus injections of electricity.

A study conducted in 2023 by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis and JMK
Research on the RTS market in India concluded in the following overview the attractiveness of
RTS installations:

Table 4: RTS attractiveness by state, India


SN State Net metering for % Savings for Ease of Surplus Other remarks
C&I C&I customers approvals for compensation
net metering payable
1 Chhattisgarh Allowed with 30 - 35% Moderate Rs 5.51/kWh
restrictions (US¢ 4.2/kWh)

2 Odisha Allowed 10 - 15% Moderate Excess


generation
lapsed

42
3 Punjab Net metering and 25 - 30% Moderate Excess
net billing allowed generation
lapsed
4 Bihar Allowed 40-45% Low Excess
generation
lapsed
5 Gujarat Allowed 10-15% High Rs. 1.75/kWh
(US c2.1/kWh)
6 Rajasthan Net metering and 30-35% Moderate Excess Levied grid
net billing allowed generation charges
with restrictions lapsed
7 Haryana Allowed with 40-45% Moderate Excess Net metering
restrictions generation connectivity is
lapsed denied to
consumers
availing open
access
8 Uttar Net metering not 40-45% Low Not applicable
Pradesh allowed
9 Delhi Allowed 35 - 40% High Rs. 4.51/kWh
(US c. 5.5/kWh)
10 Telangana Allowed 30-35% Moderate Rs. 4.36/kWh
(US¢ 5.3/kWh)
11 Andra Allowed 30 - 35% High Rs. 4.32/kWh
Pradesh (US c. 5.2/kWh)
2
12 Karnataka Allowed with 45 - 50% Moderate Rs. 2.84/kWh
restrictions (US c. 3.4/kWh)
13 Tamil Nadu Net billing allowed 30-35% Low Based on Network charges
preferential tariff are levied on all
types of
consumers
3
14 Maharashtra Allowed with 50 - 55% Moderate Rs. 3.05/kWh
restrictions (US c.3.7/kWh)
15 Madhya Allowed with 30-35% Moderate Rs. 3.63/kWh
Pradesh restrictions (US c. 4.4/kWh)

4.2.2 Vietnam

While the New National Development Plan (PDP 8) lays out more ambitious long-term goals for
RE, including solar energy, the implementation remains rather slow, with the Direct Power
Purchase Agreement (DPPA) program regulations still pending, solar (and wind) projects
receiving tariffs making project profitability challenging, and further negatively perceived
adjustments of the PPA template. While the bidding law has been updated, specific prospects for

2 Net metering connectivity is denied to consumers availing open access; restricts net metering availability
to CAPEX - based systems
3 Same.
43
utility-scale solar remain vague, also due to the ongoing required national grid updates. The C&I
market continues to be one of the steadier growing segments in the solar energy market.

• Direct PPA (DPPA) program: The new PDP 8 emphasizes the need for regulations for the
pending DPPA program. In August 2023, the Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT)
submitted a report to the Prime Minister with two options for the DPPA program, the first
option without going through Vietnam Electricity’s (EVN) grid. In this case, which the
ministry recommended for implementation, the sales of electricity would be conducted via
privately invested transmission lines, hence mitigating capacity, voltage level, and
electricity use restrictions. Applicable tariff would be the electricity retail prices for large
users regulated under Decision No. 1062, dated May 4, 2023, with an average price at
1,920.37 VND/kWh (around 0.081 USD/kWh). The second option would be going through
EVN’s grid, requiring a minimum capacity of 10 MW, and selling at voltage levels > 22 kV.
The tariff for the second option would be governed by the Prime Minister’s Decision No
24/2017 about the average electricity retail prices and Decision No 28/2014 about the
electricity price bracket until the Law on Price would come into effect, which would base
tariff on production costs plus service fee.

• Transitional solar (and wind) project mechanism: On October 3, 2022 the MOIT issued
Circular 15/2022/TT-BCT describing the method for formulating tariff ranges for
transitional solar (and wind) power plants. On January 19 2023, the MOIT issued Circular
No. 01/2023/TT-BCT which annulled certain provisions regarding the implementation and
development of solar (and wind) projects, including annulment of FIT references, USD
indexation, 20-year PPA tenure, and rooftop solar capacity limits. On January 7, 2023, the
MOIT issued Decision No. 21/QD-BCT setting ceiling prices (EVN to negotiate tariffs per
project) tariff for transitional solar (and wind) power plants, with ground-mounted solar at
1,184.9 VND/kWh (around 0.049 USD/kWh) and floating solar at 1,508.27 VND/kWh
(around 0.063 USD/kWh). On the 24/25th of May 2023 the MOIT issued documents to
EVN regarding the urgency to negotiate temporary tariffs for operational projects and
submit to MOIT for approval and issue PPAs for projects with MOIT-approved tariffs.
Meanwhile most affected projects have entered PPAs with temporary tariffs equal to 50%
of ceiling price under Decision No 21/QD-BCT with EVN.

44
• Updated bidding law: On July 23, 2023 a new bidding law was passed by the National
Assembly, coming into effect on January 1, 2024, which also is applicable to power
generation and transmission projects. The new bidding law clarifies when bidding for
investor selection is applicable and adds five new inclusions – a new approach to the
scope of application of international bidding, new criteria to assess bids and select winning
investors, new detailed regulations on the list of key provisions of project contracts, new
requirements regarding contract performance security, and new conditions for project
transfers.
• Commercial & industrial (C&I): The C&I segment shows steady growth and given the
prioritization of rooftop solar in Vietnam’s PDP 8, is expected to be a major market
segment with a broad mix of international and local players developing projects.

4.2.3 China

The Renewable Energy Law is a framework policy that lays out the general conditions for
renewable energy to become a more important energy source in the People's Republic of China.
It covers all modern forms of renewable energy, i.e., wind, solar, water, biomass, geothermal and
ocean energy, but not low-efficiency burning of straw, firewood and dejecta. Renewable energy
becomes the preferential area for energy development under this law. Furthermore, research and
development and the industrial development of renewable energy are listed as the preferential
area for hi-tech industrial development in the national program. According to the renewable
energy law, the State Council is responsible for the overall implementation, management,
development, and utilization of renewable energy at the national level. It sets middle- and long-
term targets for the total volume of renewable energy development, and, on the basis of this, will
prepare national plans for the implementation of these targets. In drawing up these targets and
plans, it will cooperate with the regional and local peoples’ governments to reflect regional
differences in the final plans. Renewable power generation projects will have to obtain an
administrative permit to proceed with project development; should there be more than one
application for the same project license, an open tendering process will be held. Project
developers that have obtained an administrative permit will be guaranteed a connection to the
power and gas grid. All output can be sold at guaranteed prices to the grid company, where prices
will be determined by the price authorities of the State Council. Grid operators will be able to
recover extra costs associated with this regime through their own selling prices. Energy authorities
of local peoples’ governments shall prepare renewable energy development plans specifically for
rural areas with specific financial support. Standards for renewable energy technologies will be
45
set by the standardization authorities of the State Council. In case of breaches of the law by
government entities, or grid, gas pipeline or fuel companies, penalties can be imposed by the
relevant superior government authority.

China's National Energy Administration (NEA) has attempted to move the dial on small scale PV
in the nation by asking its provincial offices to nominate counties where a trial program to push
blanket rooftop solar can be carried out. The state entity wants selected counties to have at least
20% of all residential rooftops equipped with solar, as well as at least 30% of commercial and
industrial structures; 40% of non-government public buildings, such as hospitals and schools; and
half of the roofs on the government estate.

Although research suggests that incentive policies such as solar subsidies and investment tax
credits are crucial in driving RTS penetration, the Chinese government has been reducing state-
level solar subsidies year by year, while the growth rate of RTS has significantly accelerated (Xu
et al., 2023). Over these years, the subsidy for RTS power generation has been reduced several
times from USD 0.059 per kWh (tax included) in 2013 to USD 0.0042 per kWh in 2021, and 2021
is the last year of this national-level financial subsidy (NDRC, 2021). Interestingly, the adoption of
RTS did not slow down even with the withdrawal of subsidies. In fact, the growth of RTS reached
its highest point in 2021. Notably, this was the same year when subsidies were scheduled for
elimination. FITs and subsidies were greatly reduced and capacity caps and budget controls
became stricter—not only for centralized (utility-scale) solar PV as before but also for distributed
PV projects, which were capped at no more than 10 GW for the first time. In 2019, capacity caps
and subsidy budget control became stricter still. The total budget for PV projects was RMB 3
billion, including RMB 0.75 billion for household distributed PV (about 3.5 GWp) and RMB 2.25
billion for large-scale PV projects and wholesale distributed PV projects.

46
Figure 14: China's Feed-in Tariff and Subsidy for PV projects, 2013 - 2020 (RMB/kWh, including
tax) (Source: Martinot et al., 2020)

The existing forms of policy support are ending, including both the feed-in tariff policy and
production subsidies. As this happens, distributed energy is gravitating toward market-oriented
and competitive models. At the same time, new policies are emerging that will indirectly support
distributed energy, remove barriers, and provide a favorable environment for distributed energy
to continue to grow. For example, new policies encourage that additional energy demand in cities
be met, in full or mostly, by distributed energy generation. The small residential subsidy may still
prove effective because the residential retail tariff is low. A possible new policy and market
mechanism will allow “peer-to-peer” sales and exchanges of distributed power on a local
distributed system, with distribution wheeling fees to be paid to the grid utility. And Chinese cities
are faced with reducing and stabilizing carbon emissions by 2030 and will be enacting a wide
range of urban planning strategies and investments to meet those goals, including distributed
energy.

4.2.4 Bangladesh

Bangladesh’s RTS sector is in a way similar to Vietnam’s, in terms of regulatory predictability and
share of responsibility among public stakeholders. Numerous regulations relating to the RTS
projects are still too general and incomprehensive, leading to difference and inconsistency in
interpreting and applying the laws amongst competent authorities. This, in turns, creates
difficulties to the developers/investors to carry out their generation of electricity. In Vietnam, the
current laws provide that the rooftop solar power developers can sell the remaining electricity,
47
after generated for onsite consumption, to EVN or another off taker. However, due to the lack of
specific guidance on connection of such excess electricity to the grid at the moment, the excess
electricity may not be conveyed back to the national grid for selling to EVN or another off taker.
China represents an outlier when it comes to RTS due to its manufacturing force and economies
of scale, so much so that subsidies for solar PV panels have been eliminated. After the Renewable
Energy Law took effect in 2006, PV penetration was accelerated. Capital subsidies and feed-in
tariffs, which were still in a trial stage, public bidding and the cooperation among relevant
Ministries played important roles. A series of public R&D projects provided elemental technologies
and meanwhile the preferential tax policies encouraged PV R&D nationwide. From the China RTS
experience, Bangladesh can establish a clearer framework for capital subsidies, create an
enabling environment for R&D projects, and encourage local manufacturing. Local manufacturing
would not be a novelty in Bangladesh, as proven during the IDCOL SHS program, where local
supply chains for batteries and PV panels had been created.

India might represent Bangladesh’s peer in terms of RTS journey. India’s early experience with
its RTS market has revealed two significant barriers to market growth, which can be seen today
in Bangladesh, and that are directly linked to (i) equity and political economy factors and (ii)
institutional factors in the electricity distribution sector. The electricity distribution tariffs in Indian
states are used as an income redistribution tool. The political economy of this aspect is very
sensitive, and the central government’s role is limited since the electricity distribution sector is
controlled by the elected governments in each of the 28 states. Furthermore, distribution
companies (DISCOMS) are bundled meaning that in addition to owning and operating distribution
grids, they are retailers responsible for customer service delivery and payment collection. As the
growth of grid-connected solar rooftops could affect the financial viability of these companies, they
have a tendency to resist or slow down penetration of RTS PV, unless incentives are provided,
enabling DISCOMS also to benefit from the deployment of these resources.

5 Case Studies

5.1 India

Birla Education Trust - GSE Renewables (EPC)


One of the oldest education trusts in the country, running five schools and the country’s first
science and technology museum under their roof. BET campus primarily consists of historic
buildings with old electric system arrangements and a lack of stairway access to roofs. There was

48
one transformer present for a widespread system, and cable routing was a major challenge. Also,
because Rajasthan is an area with high wind speeds, higher structural stability was needed. Non
availability of a proper ladder to the roof was also one of the challenges. To ensure the safety of
the long cable routing, after every inverter, one breaker was installed. A stronger structure was
installed to withstand heavy wind loads. The client is saving on electricity costs by 30%.

Table 5: Project information India

Key Information

Type of Project OPEX – Boot

Generation Capacity (kWp) 237

Site Plani, Rajasthan

Carbon Emission Saved 194 metric tons

Client Savings (in INR) 26 Lakhs

Date of Commissioning January 2019

Trees Saved 7584 (115 annually)

Type of Project Rooftop RCC behind the meter

5.2 Vietnam

Nhon Trach Industrial Zone - Dien Xanh 365 (EPC) (GoodWe, 2021)
Dong Nai is considered a province of great development potential in rooftop solar energy. The
province is rich in solar resources with an average yearly irradiation reaching 1850 kWh / m2 and
average total sunshine hours at approximately 2500 hours / year. Dong Nai presents many
advantages for solar energy projects, especially in industrial zones and industrial clusters. The
project owner chose Dien Xanh 365, an outstanding EPC provider in Vietnam, for the installation.
To maximize cost efficiency, Dien Xanh 365 proposed 410Wp JA solar panels to be paired with
Good We GW120K-HT and form a 5MWp solar system which is expected to earn over 565k USD
per year and minimize O&M costs.

49
Table 6: Project information Vietnam

Key Information
Type of Project OPEX
System Capacity 5 MWp
Technology JA Solar 410W * 12,300 units - solar PV
GW120K-HT * 37 units - inverter
Electricity generation 7 GWh/year
Site Nhon Trach, Dong Nai
Carbon Emission Saved 5,667 tons
Client Savings 565,000 USD per year
Date of Commissioning November 2020
Type of Project Rooftop RCC behind the meter

5.3 China

Great Wall Motor - Trina Solar (EPC)


GWM is one of the largest automobile manufacturers in China, with over 4% of the market share
within China and supply operations across the Eurasian region. The combined annual savings in
CO2 and other gasses is equivalent to planting 962,600 trees each year, helping enterprises
achieve the ambitious goal of “becoming the first zero-carbon factory in 2023". Design and Layout:
The grid uses Trina Solar's 210 Vertex 670W series ultra-high-power modules.

Table 7: Project information China

Key Information
Type of Project CAPEX

Generation Capacity (in MW) 18

Annual average power generation capacity 20,825,500


(kWh)
Annual saving of coal 6,350 tons

Average annual saving of carbon dioxide 17,326 tons

Annual saving sulfur dioxide 3.332 tons

Annual saving of Nitrogen oxides 3.728 tons

50
5.4 Bangladesh

Greener Garments Initiative – Project 1


The RMG Company I , a pivotal location in Kabirpur, Savar exemplifies a commitment to
cutting-edge practices with its deployment of a special model designed to mitigate moral hazard
and adverse selection under Operational Expenditure (OPEX) parameters. This distinctive
approach not only enhances operational efficiency but also highlights the organization's
dedication to fostering a risk-conscious environment.

Moreover, the RMG Company I project, seamlessly integrated into the Bangladesh Rural
Electrification Board (BREB) grid connection, operates with a phase 3 connection type, aligning
perfectly with the national Net Energy Metering (NEM) guidelines. The utilization of phase 3
connection is particularly noteworthy, as it is considered ideal for rooftop solar installations,
showcasing the company's strategic alignment with sustainable energy practices.

Table 8: Project information Bangladesh Project 1

Key Information

Type of Project OPEX


Per panel Capacity (Wp) 660
Total no. of Panels Used 809
Total No of building/shed used 2
Capacity (kWp) 534
Project Cost in BDT 3,25,26,595.93
Energy Generation 635,247 kWh/year
CO2 saved in kg/ per year 437,855
Electricity Bill Savings in BDT 1,100,000
Commission Date 17th January, 2024
Operation period 20 years

Greener Garments Initiative – Project 2


The RMG Company II ), located in Sreepur, Gazipur, sets a benchmark for innovative practices
with its implementation of a specialized model aimed at addressing moral hazard and adverse
selection within Operational Expenditure (OPEX) parameters.

51
The RMG Company II project also integrates into the BREB grid connection, utilizing a phase-
3 connection type that aligns with the NEM guidelines and is optiomal for rooftop solar
installations.

Table 9: Project information Bangladesh Project 2

Key Information

Type of Project OPEX


Per panel Capacity (Wp) 660
Total no. of Panels Used 792
Total No of building/shed used 2
Capacity (kWp) 523
Project Cost in BDT 24,942,517.69
Energy Generation (kWh) 642,694
CO2 Saved in kg/ Per Year 294,273
Electricity Bill Savings in BDT 659,538
Commission Date 28th November, 2023
Operation Period 20 years

Greener Garments Initiative – Project 3

The RMG Company III ) located in Jamgora, Ashulia, serves as a prime example within
Operational Expenditure (OPEX) parameters. Despite its relatively smaller capacities compared
to previous OPEX models, The RMG Comapny III seamlessly integrates into the Bangladesh
Rural Electrification Board (BREB) grid connection. Operating with a phase 3 connection type, it
aligns perfectly with national Net Energy Metering (NEM) guidelines. This choice of phase 3
connection is particularly noteworthy, as it is deemed optimal for rooftop solar installations,
showcasing the company's strategic commitment to sustainable energy practices.

The company of the author has effectively installed three OPEX projects, yielding valuable
insights. From this experience, it has become evident that the implementation of EPC must
adhere to a rigorous process. Effective communication between the off-taker is also paramount
for successful execution. Otherwise, the project remains prone to delays and additional (often
unforeseen) cost. To ensure a seamless implementation, we propose the following process flow
Figure 15).

52
Table 10: Project information Bangladesh Project 3

Key Information

Type of Project OPEX


Per panel Capacity (Wp) 660
Total no. of Panels Used 432
Total No of building/shed used 2 buildings, 1 shed
Capacity (kWp) 285.12
Project Cost in BDT 13,905,656
Energy Generation (kWh) 360,185
CO2 Saved in kg/ Per Year 165,647
Electricity Bill Savings in BDT 316,769
Commission Date 3rd December, 2023
Operation Period 20 years

Figure 15: Project implementation process

53
Transformative Potential of Bangladesh’s Tea Estates under net-metering & public PPAs
There is a transformative potential for Bangladesh’s Tea Estates through the adoption of
renewable energy solutions. Beyond operational enhancements and core business outcomes,
this shift embodies a dedication to environmental stewardship, economic efficiency, and a leading
role in fostering sustainable practices within the broader agricultural landscape. Tea estates
represent another promising sector for distributed solar, serving as a logical progression following
the RMG sector. With a vast total land area dedicated to tea cultivation in Bangladesh amounting
to 280,000 acres, of which approximately 50% (140,000 acres) is actively used for tea farming,
tea estates hold significant potential for solar integration. The remaining land, characterized by
low-lying terrain, flooding, and poor soil conditions, presents opportunities for sustainable solar
projects.

Tea cultivation is a substantial contributor to Bangladesh's economy, employing four million


individuals and standing as the second-largest cash crop in the country. This sector's entry into
distributed solar initiatives could further diversify and strengthen the renewable energy landscape,
contributing to both economic and environmental sustainability. The following short case
consolidates findings and recommendations based on an extensive analysis of present energy
consumption patterns at a representative Tea Estate introducing three potential components
under the OPEX modality: Rooftop Solar (RTS) on existing sheds mechanically suitable for PV
panel installations, Floating Solar PV (FPV) on the tea estates’ own lake, and Ground Mounted
PV (GMPV) for areas not suitable to grow tea on. Detailed energy consumption analysis, followed
by a practical design of a 127 kWp RTS system, indicates a required investment of BDT8.12M
with a 7-year Payback Period (PBP) and a 16.5% Return on Investment (ROI). This is in
combination with a high-level estimation of an FPV Plant with a capacity of 4.2MWp on the lake
of the Tea Estate requires an approximate investment of $4.93M, with a projected tariff of $0.16
per kWh under a public PPA. This investment yields an attractive Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of
28.77% over a 20-year PPA tenure (SOLshare, 2023). Similarly, a high-level estimation of a
GMPV plant with a capacity of 1 MWp on the land area adjacent to the lake of the Tea Estate
requires an approximate investment of $0.436M, with a projected tariff of $0.12 per kWh. This
investment results in an attractive IRR of 19.91% over a 20-year PPA tenure.

54
5.5 Comparison of Bangladesh RTS OPEX market to India, Vietnam, and China

Table 11: RTS OPEX comparison between countries

Topic Bangladesh China India Vietnam

Operationalization

Net metering for Allowed, but lacks Allowed, with power Allowed, with certain FiT and Solar
C&I power evacuation evacuation restrictions based Policies expired in
compensation compensation on state 2020
Ease of approvals Easy Easy Moderate Low due to absent
for net metering regulations

% Savings for 10-17.5% 10% - 30% 10% - 55% 10% -


Customers (C&I) 20%(McKinsey,
2023)
Financing

Access to Limited to IDCOL & Green loans and Limited Low; recent
financing Bangladesh Bank non-recourse project international
instruments and Green financing (re- financing financing
institutions financing) agreements (ADB
loan)
Market appetite High due to High due to national Market reached High during the 3
consecutive energy solar targets and saturation for C&I year FiT
tariff hikes governmental
incentives
Investment trends Foreign investments High, increased Flows towards open Early-stage market
are slow due to appetite due to access and utility- entry of international
effective risk decarbonization scale market banks
mitigation protection targets and low cost
measures of technology
Regulatory setup

Overall regulatory The government is Supportive and Restrictive net Lack of incentive
perception encouraging. comprehensive metering provisions, policies
stringent conditions
on the maximum
Requires solar size system
installations of
approved
components

Intricacies of Clear set up in the Clear setup Clear setup, state by Unclear
stakeholders’ private sector. state basis responsibilities
constellation/setup However, it is between national
unclear how the and municipal
structure and authorities
policies are defined
for government
entities.
Predictability of Low Predictable and Consistent Low
regulations consistent

55
Governmental incentives

Tax exemptions No exemptions in A three-year Exempt from paying Draft proposal from
general. exemption and income tax on all MOIT on tax
three-year 50% project earnings for exemption for solar
reduction in the first ten years of components
An exemption exists corporate income their existence and
for IPPs which are taxes. Additional operation, and
selling power to the fiscal and taxation accelerated
government utility support. depreciation (AD)
allows solar energy
producers to recover
40% of their costs in
the first year.
Subsidies No Subsidy Declining due to Capital subsidies + Draft proposal from
reduced CAPEX Subsidies for the MOIT on reduced
costs (market pull) residential sector of lending rates via
40% up to 3 kW, State Bank of
20% for capacity Vietnam
between 3 and 10
kW.
Public financing Limited to IDCOL For RTS for public Renewable Energy Draft regulation on
institutions Certificates (RECs) exemption from
predominant. power operation
licenses and
electricity business
registration
certificates

Legend:

Lack of incentives and supporting policies, unpredictable setup

Moderately enabling setup

Enabling and clear setup for RTS, easiness of doing business, transparent and predictable

56
6 Conclusion

6.1 General remarks

Rooftop Solar (RTS) stands as an example of sustainable energy, providing environmental,


economic, and social benefits. As the world continues to grapple with the challenges of climate
change and the transition to renewable energy, RTS could become a pivotal player in shaping a
greener and more sustainable future. With further increasing utility prices and increased
awareness, rooftop solar will play an increasingly important role in Bangladesh’s energy mix.
The C&I RTS segment has its challenges, such as system ownership, maintenance
responsibilities and distribution of benefits between building owners and tenants, but as
Bangladesh aims to achieve its Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), the country will
strive to make the economics stack up for this energy-hungry sector.

6.2 Learnings from other countries


In India, the RTS market is yet to truly pick up. Regulatory uncertainties and lack of support from
local DISCOMs have forced prominent developers to either shift their focus to other segments or
exit the market by selling their rooftop solar business vertical. Several states are moving away
from net metering to less beneficial gross metering and net billing arrangements. The realized
revenue and associated benefits for consumers under gross metering and net billing are
significantly less than under net metering, leading to C&I consumers shifting focus to other
greening options, such as Open Access (OA). Delhi has the best RTS policy framework, with
clear official policy directives on innovative business models, such as group net metering, virtual
net metering, P2P trading, etc. Gujarat has long been leading the way in RTS installations, mainly
due to its successful residential policy and the favourable stance of its DISCOMs towards rooftop
solar (The Print, 2022). For developing RTS, Bangladesh can look at Delhi for its policy design
and emulate Gujarat for its effective implementation. To improve the accessibility and reach of
RTS solutions, Bangladesh must actively promote innovative business models.

Despite the evolution of the policy framework with attractive incentives and explosion of RTS in
the last years in Vietnam, RTS does not seem to develop evenly across sectors. There exists
potential policy barriers and lack of initiatives to promote development of RTS, taking into account
differences in infrastructure of buildings, technology awareness and availability of capital
resources. Attractive Feed-in tariffs and financial incentives over time for promotion of solar power
project development can be key drivers towards this achievement.

57
According to Bloomberg 2023, one in five solar panels installed worldwide last year were mounted
on a Chinese rooftop, putting China at the forefront of the energy transition efforts (Bloomberg
News, 2023). Most of that rooftop solar has been added in the past two years, as China offered
support for local governments to boost installations, and raised power rates to businesses, making
generating their own electricity more attractive. The resulting renewables boom saw China build
more small-scale solar last year than the total new clean power capacity in any other country.
Ambitious in terms of local deployment in the years and decades to come, China plans to ensure
that its carbon commitments will be met in the future. Approved multiple GW-large project
pipelines, a strong focus on distributed generated power, industry specific carbon reduction plans,
an upgrading/transforming of former major coal bases, and a massive enlargement of its national
grid infrastructure among other measures, will drive demand for RTS to new heights (Haugwitz,
2022).

6.3 Hurdles in Bangladesh


In Bangladesh, the net metering regulations are not as flexible in comparison to other countries.
Consumers are only allowed to install solar capacity up to 70% of their sanctioned load, meaning
they still have to pay the utility for the remaining electricity consumption. Any production that
exceeds consumption is only paid at the significantly lower bulk tariff which is close to at par with
the LCOE of an RTS. There is also no similar facility of gross metering available in Bangladesh’s
solar energy market. Additionally, Indian state regulations for the PPA are relatively more
comprehensive as well as specific in nature and they are well implemented through state-
mandated maintenance and control mechanisms even long after the project is completed,
ensuring stability for the OPEX projects. The Bangladeshi reality is far more troublesome, as
PPAs are not often practically implemented and often risk the project’s stability and future
prospects. Indian regulations provide for an inflation-adjusted rate for the solar electricity buy-
back pricings, whereas the rates are fixed in the Bangladeshi market. Bangladesh, on the other
hand, has strict market regulations requiring EPCs and ESCOs to source a set percentage of the
components locally when commissioning a project, in addition to lacking any particular financial
incentives for the solar or renewable energy sector. Additionally, there is the burden of high tax
and import duties on the foreign-sourced components.

Reducing GHG emissions in supply chains is becoming a key factor in the sourcing strategies for
global fashion brands. Here, increased levels of RTS installations are a key enabler for
decarbonization, and therefore also for retaining the competitiveness of Bangladesh’s vital RMG
sector. However, even under a scenario of increased RTS installations on the premises of the

58
supply factories, global fashion brands will not be able to make good on their global commitments
in scope 3 emission reductions. Therefore, Corporate Power Purchase Agreements (C-PPAs),
allowing the generation or RE on another premise through wheeling, would present a possible
solution (see chapter 3). This enables businesses to secure a stable and predictable energy
supply while reducing their carbon footprint and contributing to the country's sustainable
development goals and could strongly increase the number and size of C&I PV projects. However,
to date there is no consideration of a C-PPA under the net metering policy.

6.4 Specific Recommendations for Bangladesh

To promote and accelerate the growth of RTS, and particularly OPEX RTS in Bangladesh,
based on the comparative analysis between Bangladesh, India, China, and Vietnam, along with
the collective knowledge and work of the consultant’s team of experts, the following
recommendations are proposed:

For the public actors and the development sector, especially SREDA in collaboration with
the Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resource:

• Establish a framework for C-PPAs and wheeling: allowing for C-PPAs could enable the
quick and efficient development of areas which are suitable for PV installations (ground-
mounted or roof spaces) by RESCOs and would allow companies, e.g. from the RMG
sector, to meet their RE targets. A fair wheeling charge would ensure that DISCOMs don’t
suffer losses from increased wheeling.
• Promote a simplified grid-connection process for RTS: the smoother the official
processes for connecting an RTS plant, the quicker the sector can develop.
• Establish a framework to provide private developers with governmental PPAs for
projects on public infrastructures, such as airports, metro stations, other larger public
buildings, etc. There are large quantities of spaces that could be utilized for this purpose
(e.g. on multiple metro stations currently under construction in Dhaka), however, the
absence of an overall framework which urges the responsible government agencies to
tender these spaces out for solar power leads to these spaces being unutilized on a large
scale.
A similar construct would work for C&I buildings where the owner is (for whatever reason)
not interested to set up a solar plant for his own consumption or the ownership structure
is such that the on-site consumer is not the same as the building owner (e.g. for the EPZs
where many buildings are leased by e.g. BEPZA out to the individual companies): Here,

59
the GoB could offer to purchase that power through a PPAs if the project developer is able
to come up with an agreement with the site owner to lease the necessary rooftop space.
• Create a national guarantee fund to give financial players more comfort and bring
down the hurdle of bank guarantee requirements: For India, for example, such an option
was proposed in the study “Credit Support Pathways for Rooftop Solar Projects in India”
by the Climate Policy Initiative (October 2018). The study states that “We find that under
Credit Guarantee Mechanism, one million dollars of donor grant capital invested in the
facility enables US$14 million of capital mobilization, and a capacity installation of 18 MW
in the rooftop solar sector.” The MW number would be even higher with today’s decreased
PV prices.4
• Fund or subsidize the piloting of new business and finance models that are not widely
adopted but show great potential for scale-up;
• Implement systematic data collection to enable data-driven financial forecasting and
benchmarking between suppliers (see chapter 3.2) through SREDA
• Provide incentives for foreign direct investments and ease the repatriation of funds
processes. This would make it easier for local developers to attract foreign investment
which is crucial for these kinds of projects, especially as most of the components for PV
plants are imported.
• Fund local market studies that allow public decision-makers to measure market maturity,
business outlooks, potential sites and development opportunities. Such studies could be
implemented via the Solar Help Desk at SREDA, for example. The focus of a study could
e.g. be the public buildings that fall under the ownership of a specific national ministry and
assess the potential roofs and PV sizes that could be installed on those premises; these
could then be tendered out together under the OPEX model, allowing the government to
save on electricity costs without investing. Another example could be solar thermal
collectors for thermal processes in RMG factories which are currently powered by gas;
example cases of these have been implemented in China and, to a pilot stage, in Vietnam.

For the industry and the financiers, especially IDCOL:


• Reducing the administrative effort and timeline from the currently approximately 9
months of average processing time to get a loan. Such long lead time makes it almost

4 In the Net Metering Gap Report (GIZ, 2023), it has also been proposed that the Bangladesh Bank could
give such payment guarantees to RESCOs or, alternatively, that the DISCOMs could guarantee the off-
take of electricity from stranded projects at the national bulk purchase rate to ensure some safe cashflow
for these cases.
60
impossible to sustain on a market where a customer wants a project implemented as
quickly as possible.

• Reduce the bank guarantee requirement, ranging currently between 50% and 100%:
Requiring the same (or half) the amount of the loan itself as a guarantee renders the whole
idea of the loan leverage impossible, as the loanee needs to provide the same (or half)
the amount as guarantee from its assets. IDCOL could also help to develop other, new
forms of third-party risk-sharing.

• IDCOL could also identify and finance new business models and share the results
and metrics with the industry to develop the market.

61
7 Bibliography

1. Ayan, M Ashique Hassan and Pritha, Durdana Hassin. (2021). OPEX Model: Challenges
and Prospects in Bangladesh. Meghna Printer’s, Dhaka. TFE Consulting GmbH,
“BUSINESS CASE FOR COMMERCIAL-SCALEROOFTOP PV INSTALLATIONS IN
BANGLADESH,” Munich: 2017.

2. Eco-friendly zones. (2023). BEPZA. [Link]

3. China Takes Its Climate Fight to the Rooftops. (2023). Bloomberg News.
[Link]
leads-world-on-clean-energy-capacity?leadSource=uverify%20wall

4. Chowdhury, Shahriar. Where is Bangladesh in the global race towards renewable


energy? (April 14, 2023). The Daily Star
[Link]
towards-renewable-energy-3297006

5. Deffarges, J., Delteil, B., Hata, T., Pham, V., Sengupta, S., Tara, K., & Vu, H. (2023,
October 2). Putting renewable energy within reach: Vietnam's high-stakes pivot.
McKinsey & Company. [Link]
gas/our-insights/putting-renewable-energy-within-reach-vietnams-high-stakes-pivot

6. Garg, V., Gulia, J., Gupta, K., & Sharma, P. (2023). The rooftop solar commercial &
industrial market in India. Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis.
[Link]

7. Gielen, D., Gorini, R., Wagner, N., Leme, R., Gutierrez, L., Prakash, G., ... & Renner, M.
(2019). Global energy transformation: a roadmap to 2050.
[Link]
to-2050-2019Edition

8. GIZ PDP (2023): German Energy Solutions - Solar energy for trade and industry in
Bangladesh. Webinar. Project Development Programme (PDP). Aug 30, 02023.

9. GoodWe (2021). 5MW Solar Rooftop System In the Sunny South of Vietnam. [Online].
Retrieved from:
[Link]
Vietnam_GW120K-HT_5MW_EN.pdf
62
10. Hasan, M., & Rahman, A. (2021, October 31). Target to generate 4,100MW by 2030.
The Daily Star. [Link]
4100mw-2030-2210291

11. Hassan, Md. A., & Pritha, D. H. (2023, September 28). Does renewable energy have a
future in Bangladesh? The Daily Star.
[Link]
bangladesh-3181761

12. Haugwitz, F. (2022, October 31). 2022: another record year for the Chinese solar
market. Apricum - The Cleantech Advisory. [Link]
record-year-for-the-chinese-solar-market/

13. Hill, J. S. (2021, July 23). World's largest C&I rooftop solar PV plant, 120MW, installed in
China. One Step Off The Grid. [Link]
rooftop-solar-pv-plant-120mw-installed-in-china/

14. IEA. (2020). Renewables 2020 Analysis and forecast to 2025.


[Link]

15. Islam, S. (2023, October 12). Bangladesh introduces rooftop PV requirement for big,
new buildings. pv magazine International. [Link]
[Link]/2023/10/12/bangladesh-introduces-rooftop-pv-requirement-for-big-
buildings/

16. Islam, Sayful. (2023, September 11). Bangladesh Jute Mills Corp. signs PPAs for 90
MW of rooftop PV. pv magazine International. [Link]
[Link]/2023/09/11/bangladesh-jute-mills-corp-signs-ppas-for-90-mw-of-rooftop-
pv/

17. Islam, Syful. (2023, December 8). Bangladesh approves 1.5 GW of solar. PV Magazine
International.

18. Jyoti Gulia, Gabrielle Kuiper, Akhil Thayillam, Vibhuti Garg, Ayush Jadhav. (2021).
Emerging Technology Trends in the C&I Rooftop Solar Market in India. Institute of
Energy Economics & Financial Analysis. [Link]
technology-trends-ci-rooftop-solar-market-india

19. Khan, Ahammad Parvej. 2023. Power from rooftop solar projects. Bangladesh Post.
[Link]

63
20. MARTINOT, E., HONG, M., RUNQING, H., MOFAN, Z., & MIN, Y. (2020). Distributed
energy in China: review and perspective 2020–2025. World Resources Institute Working
Paper, [Link] wri. org.
cn/en/working_paper/2020/10/DISTRIBUTED_ENERGY_IN_CHINA_REVIEW_AND_PE
RSPECTIVE_2020_2025_EN.

21. Prasad, Nithin.(2020). CAPEX VS OPEX- Ways to finance Rooftop Solar Systems and
Realize Huge Savings.
[Link]

22. Mordor Intelligence Research & Advisory. (2023). Solar Energy Market in Bangladesh
Size, Share & Industry Analysis. Retrieved November 25, 2023, from
[Link]

23. National development and Reform Commission China. (2021). Notice on matters related
to new energy on-grid tariff policy.
[Link]

24. National Database of Renewable Energy. (2024). SREDA.

25. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. (2023). Guide to Chinese Climate Policy. Retrieved
from [Link]
policies/renewable-power/solar-power/

26. PV Magazine. (2022, June 2). C&I rooftops turn toward the sun. pv magazine
International. [Link]

27. REGLOBAL. (2023). Outlook for solar power growth in China and Japan. (n.d.).
Retrieved from [Link]

28. The World Bank. (2023, September 12). CPIA 2023: Top Highlights in Five Charts.
[Link]
c2910bb6548e

29. Sirur, Simrin. (2022. December 20). Gujarat is scripting the biggest solar power
revolution in India. Other states can catch up. The Print.

64
30. Uddin, Mahfuz. (2022). Future bright for RMG sector after record year. The Daily Star.
[Link]
tomorrow/news/future-bright-rmg-sector-after-record-year-2960541

31. U.S. Department of Energy. (2023, August 3). Quarterly Solar Industry Update.
Retrieved from [Link]

32. UNICEF Viet Nam, Ministry of Education and Training, & Global Green Growth Institute.
(2022). Rooftop solar power: A potential solution in clean energy for climate-smart
schools in Viet Nam. [Report]. UNICEF Viet Nam.
[Link]

33. USAID. (2018). PACE-D Technical Assistance Program - Utility-Centric Business


Models for Scaling Rooftop Solar [Link]. Utility Centric Business Models for
Rooftop Solar Projects. [Report]. [Link]

34. Xu, K., Ding, Y., & Wang, Z. (2023). What drives residential rooftop solar growth in
China? A spatial analysis using city-level data. Ecological Indicators, 154, 110778.
[Link]

35. Yan, J., Yang, Y., Elia Campana, P., & He, J. (2019). City-level analysis of subsidy-free
solar photovoltaic electricity price, profits and grid parity in China. Nature Energy, 4(8),
709-717. [Link]
level_analysis_of_subsidy-
free_solar_photovoltaic_electricity_price_profits_and_grid_parity_in_China

36. Zhu, L., Xu, Y., & Pan, Y. (2019). Enabled comparative advantage strategy in China's
solar PV development. Energy Policy, 133, 110880.
[Link]

65

You might also like