College of Education, Arts and Sciences
RUBRIC FOR DEMONSTRATION
Program: _________ Group No.: ______ Date:_________ Score: _______
Criteria 5 – Excellent 4 – Very Good 3 – Satisfactory 2 – Needs Improvement 1 – Poor
Accurate, in-
Mostly accurate; Basic Major gaps in Very limited
1. Content depth content;
shows strong understanding; understanding; several or incorrect
Mastery exceeds
understanding minor errors inaccuracies content
expectations
Mostly
Clear, logical, Some No clear
2. Organization organized; Disorganized in parts;
well-structured organization; structure or
& Flow transitions are ideas are jumbled
presentation few transitions logic
present
Confident,
Clear and Very poor
engaging, with Sometimes
3. Presentation audible; some Monotonous or hard to delivery;
proper volume, unclear; needs
Skills variation in hear inaudible or
tone, and more confidence
delivery distracting
posture
Creative, No visual
Relevant and Some visuals
4. Visual Aids / professional, Visuals unclear or poorly aids or
clear visuals used but basic
Media enhances the designed completely
used or inconsistent
presentation ineffective
All members Uneven
Most members No evident
5. Teamwork & are equally participation; One or two active
contributed teamwork or
Participation involved and some did most members only
actively collaboration
cooperative work
Encourages Accepts and
No
discussion or answers Accepts
6. Engagement / Avoids or struggles to interaction
questions; audience questions but
Interaction answer questions with
responds questions answers briefly
audience
insightfully clearly
Uncontrolled
Right on time; Slightly off-time; Minor pacing time;
7. Time Poor pacing; rushed or
content is well- mostly well- issues; slight presentation
Management too long
paced paced overruns cut or
incomplete
College of Education, Arts and Sciences
Criteria 5 – Excellent 4 – Very Good 3 – Satisfactory 2 – Needs Improvement 1 – Poor
Explains ideas Very
Ideas explained Basic
8. Clarity of clearly with Unclear explanations; confusing or
well; a few explanation;
Explanation examples and limited examples vague
examples lacks depth
depth explanations
Well-prepared,
Minor issues in Some Appears unprepared; Disrespectful
9. respectful, uses
preparation or informality; lacks unprofessional language or clearly
Professionalism formal
delivery polish or behavior unprepared
language
Cites multiple
No sources
credible Cites some Few sources;
10. Use of Incomplete or vague or
academic sources; mostly citation style
Sources sources plagiarized
sources credible needs work
content
properly
Score Range Descriptive Rating: 45–50-Outstanding; 40–44-Very Good; 35–39-Satisfactory; 30–
34-Needs Improvement; Below 30-Poor
Feedback:
Strength/s Weakness/es
Evaluated by:
______________________________________
