WISMUN

DELEGATE
TRAINING
 Rules of Conduct For the Event
Delegates must arrive at the allocated time or earlier on both days of the event to reach their
committees on time. Delegates arriving after the allocated time, delegates will not be allowed to
enter school premises. Their absence during roll calls & voting procedures will lead to automatic
expulsion from the conference.

All delegates will leave after 07:00 p.m. on the second day of the event following the closing
ceremony.

Delegates must dress in Indian Formals on the first day and Western Business -Formals during
the second day. Dress code should be maintained during all committee sessions and delegates
should follow the dress code for the post-committee events as well. If a delegate’s attire is deemed
inappropriate by the WISMUN officials, the delegate will be asked to leave the session and return
with the appropriate attire.
 Rules of Conduct For the Event
Eating during committee proceedings inside the conference room is not permitted. Delegates can
only eat during breakfast, lunch and tea breaks. It is strictly forbidden to throw waste out of the
places indicated for it. It will be a punishable offense if caught doing so.

Electronic telecommunications devices that interfere with the debate, mainly cell phones, laptops,
tablets, among others, may not be used during the committee’s proceedings unless it is used as a
tool to conduct research or to create working papers. Any other use is strictly forbidden and if
caught, may lead to confiscation of such devices for the whole duration of the event and/or maybe
barred from an award, at the discretion of the Secretariat and/or the Executive Board.

Direct communication between delegates during the formal debatewithin the conference room is
prohibited. Only written messages may be delivered via chits through the Logistics staff about the
committee’s proceedings, as long as the dias allows it.
 Rules of Conduct For the Event
If there is suspicion of any illegal substances being brought to the event, the WISMUN
secretariat and/or school faculty have complete authority to check the delegate’s belongings and
take appropriate action.

Conference staff, school faculty and fellow delegates should be treated with the highest level of
courtesy and respect. It is recommended that delegates carry a printout (or an e- copy) of the
RoP’s & Glossary mentioned below to help during the conference.

Delegates should keep in mind the strong anti-plagiarism policy adhered to at WISMUN using
advanced software. Any delegates found plagiarizing content for paperwork may be barred from
an award, at the discretion of the Secretariat and/or the Executive Board.
 Rules of Conduct For the Event
Delegates must independently research the information and not steal it from other delegates. Only
official sources of information like UN charters or World Bank data must be used and not from
third-party websites like Wikipedia as the legitimacy may be questioned and/or it may violate the
anti-plagiarism policy.

Delegates must speak in English throughout the event. Any other languages spoken during
committee proceedings will not be tolerated and at the discretion of the Secretariat and/or the
Executive Board, may be barred from an award and/or ejected from the conference.

WISMUN will not tolerate any instances of harassment or discrimination based on race, gender,
sexual orientation, nationality, religion, age, or disability.
Considering we are an environmentally friendly conference; we would request the delegates to
limit the usage and/or wastage of papers throughout the conference.
 Rules of Procedures - for crisis
Points:
They are tools for delegates to ask questions about the committees, its proceedings and the debate.
Point of Personal Privilege: Used where you experience some discomfort that hinders you from participating
fully in the committee proceedings.
Point of Information: Used to ask a question about the contents of a delegate’s speech. (logical fallacy and
factual inaccuracy).
Point of Order: Used where you believe a mistake of procedure has been made, (ex: where someone was skipped
on the General Speaker's list, or the wrong voting procedure was used for a matter).
Point of Parliamentary Inquiry: Used to ask a question about the committee's procedure. (Can only be used
after a speech is over and when the floor is open for points)
Right to Reply: Response to comments that have disparaged the sovereign integrity of a delegate’s state.
 Rules of Procedures - for crisis
Motions:
They are raised to introduce an action to be done in the committee.
Motion to set the agenda and the freeze date (if specified as a part of agenda)
“Motion to set the crisis agenda to ‘The bombings of Hiroshima with the freeze date 6th august 1945.”
Motion to begin with round robins
“Motion to being with round robins”
Motion to start with the moderated caucus
“Motion to enter into a moderated caucus, with the topic being ‘eradication of poverty from small island
nations’, total time being 15 minutes and the per speaker time being 1 minute.”
Motion for Trial Procedure
“Motion to initiate trial procedure against country/minister xyz”
Motion for Timed Crisis
“Motion to start a timed crisis on the aftermath of Hiroshima bombing for 15 mins”
Motion for Unmoderated caucus
“Motion to move into an unmoderated caucus for 20 mins”
 Committee Documents
A
Directives: Directives serve as swift responses to crisis updates in committee simulations. They
are more concise than traditional resolutions, omitting preambulatory clauses. A directive
typically comprises just a few clauses, focusing on action items. Delegates may motion to
introduce directives, which are then debated and voted upon. Directives may also be sent via chit
and passed with chair’s discretion. Unmoderated caucuses may be used to merge similar
directives, optimizing efficiency. They maybe used for a range of reasons including negotiations,
information and spying.
 Committee Documents
Personal directives are communications shared only between you and the crisis backroom. No other delegates can
view them (unless someone is covertly monitoring your actions), and only you will receive the outcomes. These
directives can advance your own agenda, support your cabinet’s objectives, or serve both purposes.
Example: Ordering a spy to gather blackmail material on a rival minister to gain leverage.

Joint directives are submitted by a small group of characters, though typically written by one. These directives are
useful when combining assets, coordinating cross-cabinet missions, or pursuing shared interests. Characters from
different cabinets may also collaborate on a joint directive if there's a compelling reason — such as seeking
influence in a mutual area or planning a defection. These usually align with cabinet interests, but can also serve
individual ambitions.
Example: A general and a foreign minister co-authoring a plan to smuggle weapons to a rebel group abroad.

Cabinet directives represent the coordinated actions of the entire cabinet and usually require the chair’s approval.
These are broad, strategic decisions intended to fulfil the cabinet’s official goals. They often involve major
operations, legislation, or diplomatic initiatives.
Example: Implementing a new conscription law to expand the national army, or launching a nationwide
infrastructure project.
 Committee Documents
B
Communique: Formal message or announcement sent by your character or cabinet to another
party within the crisis — this could be another cabinet, a specific character, a non-player actor
(like a rebel group, foreign power, or corporation), or even the general public. It may only be sent
via chit.

C
Press Release: A press release in a crisis committee is a type of public communiqué intended to
shape public perception, broadcast your cabinet’s stance, or control a narrative.
 Committee Documents
D
A. Presidential Statement: A formal, authoritative declaration made by the President (or a head of
state/government) — often more personal or symbolic than a generic press release, but still
carrying political weight.

E
[Link] Directive: Much like a draft resolution, this is a final and a very long directive. It
will contain all the solutions of the crisis committee to impactfully solve it at the end. The passing
of this directive will determine if the committee has failed or passed. Usually, cannot be passed via
chair’s discretion.
 Structure and Flow of the debate
Roll Call:
Within Model United Nations, the Roll Call is normally used to check who is attending, and how
many people are attending at the start of the day to calculate the number of votes needed. When
you hear your country’s name, you can reply with “Present” or “Present and Voting”. If you
choose ‘present’, you are not obligated to support or oppose any document when it’s time to vote
later on during the committees’ proceedings and can choose to remain neutral. This is a popular
choice for weaker and developing nations that don’t want to offend any of the bigger countries.
Likewise, larger nations may choose ‘present and voting’ to make clear their stances on a
particular issue.
 Structure and Flow of the debate
Setting the Agenda and the freeze date:
Once the roll call is taken, the delegates must set the agenda and the freeze date by proposing a
motion to set the already provided agenda. Once a motion has been raised, the chairs will call for
a procedural voting process, meaning that delegates are unable to abstain from and MUST vote
for or against the motion. Only a simple majority is needed and is usually passed without
hesitation.
Remember to Always speak as an ambassador of your Country. No “I’s” allowed! It’s “we”, your
country’s name, or “as the representative of Country Name.”
 Structure and Flow of the debate
Round Robins:
A round robin is a structured format used in meetings or discussions where participants speak in
turn. It is used at the start of the committee sessions and is mandatory. The speaking order
typically follows the seating arrangement. The time allocated for each speaker is usually brief,
often not exceeding one minute. This format is beneficial for initial meetings to establish positions
and priorities. It is also effective following significant updates or crises to gather a range of
responses.
 Structure and Flow of the debate
Moderated caucus:
A common procedure in crisis committees to facilitate focused debate. Proposal by Delegate:
Delegates propose a moderated caucus with a specific topic, duration, and speaking time.
Typically, chairs do not entertain moderated caucuses longer than 20 minutes. Delegates are
called upon individually to speak; may speak twice due to the small size of the committee. Crisis
committees often use a series of rolling moderated caucuses for continuous debate.
 Structure and Flow of the debate
Unmoderated caucus:
An Unmoderated Caucus is another one of the motions which can be raised when the floor is
open. When it is passed, the committee will temporarily depart to a period of discussion where a
purpose isn’t required. During an Unmoderated Caucus, no formal procedures are followed, in
other words, delegates can freely communicate with multiple other delegates informally within the
Rules of conduct. Usually, during this time delegates may form blocs and work on their various
committee documents such as the resolutory directive.
 Structure and Flow of the debate
Timed Crisis:
Timed crises are designed to replicate real-world urgency and challenge delegates to act quickly
and decisively. During these scenarios, the Chair may modify standard parliamentary procedures
to suit the fast-paced nature of the situation. This can include suspending formal requirements—
such as written proposals—in favour of more immediate verbal directives. The focus shifts to
rapid decision-making, efficient collaboration, and prioritizing actions under pressure. Delegates
must be ready to work together swiftly and adapt to the limited structure, aiming to resolve the
crisis effectively within the constrained timeframe while addressing the most critical issues at
hand. They may be raised at any point of time in the committee.
 Structure and Flow of the debate
Trial Procedure:
In crisis committees, trials may be initiated to address serious offenses committed by delegates.
Once a trial is called, specific roles are assigned—usually with one delegate serving as the
prosecutor and another as the defence counsel. The Chair has full authority over the structure
and rules of the trial and may allow further arguments or evidence to be presented as needed.
After the proceedings, delegates vote on the guilt or innocence of the accused, typically requiring
a two-thirds majority for conviction. If found guilty, the delegate may face penalties such as
censure or the loss of privileges, as determined by the Chair.
 Structure and Flow of the debate
Resolutory Directive:
It is usually worked upon during final few unmoderated caucuses and sent to the Dias for
ratification. It follows a specific format and is passed via substantive voting. It serves as the final
solution for the crisis.

Sponsors and Signatories: Draft resolutions and working papers must have a certain number of
sponsors and signatories. Sponsors are the delegates who wrote the working paper, or whose ideas
are substantially represented in the paper. Signatories are delegates who would like the working
paper to be discussed and debated. Signatories need not agree with the content of the resolution
they are signing; they must only agree that it is worthy of discussion. Sponsors count towards the
total number of signatories.
 Structure and Flow of the debate
Voting procedure:
Delegates may motion to enter the voting procedure, if no motions on the floor, then the
committee will directly proceed with substantive voting for the amendment. When entering the
substantive voting procedure, each delegate votes individually (“roll- call vote”). Delegates may
choose to vote “Yes”, “No”, “Yes with rights”, “No with rights”, “Pass” and/or “Abstain” (Abstain
only possible if they didn’t choose “Present and voting” in the initial roll call).
 Stages of a resolutory directive
A resolutory directive is the final piece of committee document that the crisis committee passes.
A crisis committee may accept more than 1 directive but the chair may recommend to merge it.
It shall contain all the possible solutions required for the crisis to subside; it must answer to all
the crisis breaks.

If delegates wish to improve a resolutory directive, they may pass an amendment. Amendments
must first be written down on a chit and sent to the Dias (Chair), Amendments may be
introduced by Dias (Chair) or the delegate via motion to introduce the amendment.
If all sponsors of the draft resolution agree that the amendment should be added, it is considered
a “friendly amendment,” meaning it can be added without debate. If at least one sponsor does not
agree with the amendment, it is considered an “unfriendly amendment” and needs support from
a majority (2/3 majority) of the committee.
 Stages of a resolutory directive
A motion can be passed for 2v2 debate over the amendment with for and against the amendment.
Ex: “Motion to debate “Resolutory Directive HCC/3/v1.1/2025” with two speakers on each side,
each speaker allotted 60 seconds.” (If per speaker time is not mentioned then the default time per
speaker time is 60 secs). After the debate, delegates may motion to enter the voting procedure, if
no motions on the floor, then the committee will directly proceed with substantive voting for the
amendment.

After all changes are made to the resolutory directive. Delegates will then move into substantive
voting for the resolutory directives. Delegates may not pass two resolutory directives resolutions
that have conflicting clauses. Once a resolutory directive passes, it becomes a solution and the
crisis is successfully solved.
 Sample Committee documents
Directives
Example of Information Request
(First Crusade crisis)
“Scout Establishment
We direct our scouts to find out where the Byzantium and Crusader armies are and how many of them are
currently present. The sultan orders them to provide him with information about their numbers, equipment,
cavalry, infantry ratio, where they are located, and where they are headed. If possible, they should also try and see
who is leading the force.
If possible, several of our most stealthy soldiers should infiltrate inside the enemy camps and wait as sleeping
agents. Until further orders, they will be spotting the ones who are willing to return to their homeland, the ones
who are open to being bribed, and the ones who are willing to pursue their personal interests over Crusader
interests. (quick reminder, please remember that they have a poison that will enable them to kill themselves rather
than being exposed). The scouts should take special care to check the current Seljuk areas between Nicaea and
Ankara/Konya, but also venture into Byzantine territory and find out where the Crusader and Byzantine forces are
assembling and rallying. They are to be very careful not to be captured, and if they are captured they should
commit suicide to avoid leaking information.
 Sample Committee documents
Directives
Example of Correspondence Between Characters
(Second Schleswig War crisis)
“Send this message to Vladimir:
My dearest Vladimir,
Thank you for your service.
Next I will ask you to send this reply to Mehmet the Spymaster
The message shall say: “Be patient, it will be of great benefit to you. I will need a guarantee that my agents won’t
be disturbed. I shall send them into the battlefield of Mohacs to recover the bodies of the fallen nobles, as it would
secure me trust within the Habsburg cabinet, which will be of great benefit until we can launch the destruction
from within.
Thank you in advance,
John Zapolya”
 Sample Committee documents
Directives
Example of a Negotiation Directive
(Second Schleswig War crisis)
“The Prussian Government proposes integrating the Unionist United States of America to the Prussian/German
Customs Union. This would hallmark a historic step forward of global economic integration in an age of
industrialization. The proposed Economic Treaty of Costumes Unification between the Prussian Government and
the United States will create an area of common economic policy between the two nation-states and would create a
protectionist costumes union which would ensure our close economic alliance, whilst simultaneously protecting us
from unfair competition from the likes of France. Within this Economic Union, the two states would engage in
tariff-free trade, without any barriers to the exchange of goods, people or ideas. This exchange would involve the
exchange of military weapons (ONLY WEAPONS, NOT SOLDIERS) too, highlighting that both nations are allied
in their fight against the evil of Imperial hegemons worldwide, and are prepared to protect themselves against any
threats, thereof. We would exchange research and development funds, and even personnel in our common aim of
modernizing our states and our militaristic capabilities.
*THESE NEGOTIATIONS ARE STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL BETWEEN THE TWO NATIONS*”
 Sample Committee documents
Directives
Example of a Spying Directive
(Aztec Civil War Crisis)
Creating a Spy School
“I send instructions to start a school of elite sports and dancing. The purpose of this school is to produce spies but
it needs to be concealed from the public and any other interested parties. The opening of this school is to be public
but, its purpose is to remain hidden. All who wish to join are to be invited in.
Once worthy recruits have been found, they will train in espionage, stealth, assassinations, and information
gathering. Every once in a while, a few kids are to actually be taught dancing and sports to avoid suspicion. These
spies will be referred to as An’givare from now on in letters and communication. This is to confuse anyone who
happens to intercept my letters or messengers.
Once a few An’givare are trained, send them to Tizatlan disguised as cocoa bean merchants. Their goal is to try and
gather as much information as possible on Xicotencal I and Xicotencal II. Whilst they are gathering information,
they are to maintain their cover as cocoa bean traders and not ask too many questions regarding the targets. Also,
they should try and see if the two targets are recruiting bodyguards or have any bodyguards. They should report
back to me as soon as possible but they are to be stationed in Tizatlan from now on and will remain there with their
cover until I instruct otherwise.”
 Sample Committee documents
Directives
Assassination Request Example
(Aztec Civil War crisis)
“I proceed to invite Cuitláhuac to my palace for a dinner as I wish to discuss the future of Mexica and how the military of
Mexica will take part. The dinner starts off as normal, we talk about affairs and whatnot. The main course is to be a large
piece of meat that should be enough for both of us to eat.
Regarding the rosary peas collected earlier, I take their seeds and crush them to create a toxic liquid substance. I take a knife
and very carefully rub one side of the knife with mixture then set it aside and leave it to dry. I make sure it is only one side of
the knife which is poisoned and mark the poisoned by inscribing a rune on the handle.
When the main course arrives, I pay attention to which side of the knife is poisoned and cut the meat from the middle. I
offer Cuitláhuac the meat cut from the side which was exposed to the poison and take the normal cut myself. I then proceed
to eat the food myself to gain his trust, at which point Cuitláhuac will assume I am not poisoning him and carry on with the
dinner. Keep in mind, this is a slow acting poison so will not kill him immediately. After the main, I start coughing slightly
and proceed to end the dinner and thank Cuitláhuac for joining me.
A few days later, he will die and I will feign to be very ill. I then interrogate the chef and announce my chef was blackmailed
by Tangaxuan II to try and poison myself and Cuitláhuac and make this information public.
After Cuitláhuac has died, I put myself forward as being the new leader of Tenochtitlan and claim war is the only way we
can fight for our honour.”
 Sample Committee documents
Press release
“Today begins a new era for the People of France. Eighty years after the first French Revolution of 1789, a new
outburst of freedom and pride has wiped out the illegitimate bonapartist institutions. The Republican
Revolutionary army has won a decisive battle against oppression and obscurantism, thus paving the way for a new
brighter future for our Nation.
As a consequence, the Republican government will put an end to the war against Prussia by signing an armistice
with the Prussian government and withdrawing the brave French soldiers from the German soil. Our new Prussian
allies will support the rightful popular movement with 80,000 troops. This additional help will reinforce the French
and American soldiers already engaging in this war for freedom and equality. Nations all over the world are backing
our revolution against the treacherous Bonapartist government.
Moreover, Léon Gambetta and the French Republican Party strongly urge their fellow citizens to revolt and capture
members of the former Bonapartist government, including the tyran Napoléon III himself.
Today, you have fought for your freedom.
Today, you have the power to choose your future and that of your children.
Today, you shall rally the Republican movement for the greater good of your Nation.
Vive la République et vive la France!
 Sample Committee documents
Communique
Communiqué from the Tlatoani’s Council – Aztec Empire:

To: All Provincial Governors, Warrior Societies, and Allied City-States

Date: Year 3 Rabbit, Month of Tlacaxipehualiztli
Subject: Emergency Military Mobilization and Diplomatic Position on Spanish Incursion

In light of the increasing aggression by the foreign invaders from across the sea — known as the Castilians or
Spaniards — and the betrayal of several allied city-states, the Tlatoani’s Council issues the following directives:
 Sample Committee documents
Communique
Military Mobilization:

All Eagle and Jaguar warrior houses are to be placed on high alert.

Troop reinforcements are to be dispatched immediately to the eastern frontier near Tlaxcala and Veracruz.

Barricades and supply routes are to be fortified in and around Tenochtitlan.

 Sample Committee documents
Communique
Alliances and Diplomacy:

Envoys are to be sent to the leaders of Texcoco and Tlacopan to reaffirm the Triple Alliance.

A conditional amnesty is offered to Tlaxcala if they agree to sever ties with the Castilans and rejoin the Mexica
under shared religious rites and tribute.

No further diplomatic contact with the Castilan leader "Cortés" will be entertained unless under flag of truce.

We, the stewards of the Mexica Empire, reaffirm our sovereignty, the supremacy of the gods, and our refusal to
submit to foreign domination. We call upon all children of the Sun to rise in defense of Tenochtitlan and our sacred
ways.
 Sample Committee documents
Communique
In service to the Tlatoani and the will of the gods,

Council of the Huey Tlatoani

Tenochtitlan, Aztec Empire

 Sample Committee documents
Resolutory directive
Resolutory Directive: {Title}
Sponsor: Maréchal Jourdan
Signatories: Maréchal Marmont, Maréchal Soult, King Joseph Bonaparte
Addresses the Historic Crisis Committee,
Recognizing the disastrous defeat of the French troops under the command of Maréchal Marmont at the Battle of
Arapiles,
1. Immediately orders a retreat of French forces and officials from Madrid, to be conducted as swiftly as possible,
to the city of Valencia. During the retreat French forces will,
a. Not engage with locals in any unnecessary conflict.
b. Take any major city without approval from the council.
c. Engage in looting or otherwise uncouth behaviour (to be punished accordingly).
d. Defend civilians from the looting of guerillas.
2. Advises Maréchal Soult to swiftly abandon the siege of Cádiz, recommending that he, a. Destroy the muzzles of
the cannons that cannot be taken with the troops under his command.
3. Reallocates 7,500 troops to bolster the rear-guard of the forces under Jourdan’s Command.