Supervised Community Experience for CHEWs
Supervised Community Experience for CHEWs
LECTURE NOTE
ON
FOR
COMPILED BY:
EKU, OMOM OBAJI
(RCHEW, RCHO, PHCT, [Link] PUBLIC HEALTH, BSCEDHE, [Link] COMMUNITY HEALTH IN
VIEW.)
2
INTRODUCTION
Community Mobilization has been defined as a capacity building process through which
community individuals, groups, or organization’s plan, carry out and evaluate activities on
a participatory and sustained basis to improve health and other needs on their own
initiative or stimulated by others. This process must involve the whole community, not just
the specific actors who are directly involved in the intervention programme.
A community could be considered “mobilized” when all members feel as though the issue
is important to them and worthy of action and support. Community mobilization inherently
involves community engagement and partnership which are the universally-identified key
components to success. These key components include recruiting community members to
participate in needs assessments, convening advisory boards comprised of multiple
constituencies within a community, empowering community members to carry out chosen
intervention strategies and evaluation endeavors, and recruiting community members to
occupy leadership positions within the prevention effort.
Definition of a Community
The World Health Organization (1978) stated that a community consists of people living
together in some form of social organization and cohesion. Its members share in varying
degree political, economic, social and cultural characteristics, as well as interests and
aspirations including health. Communities vary widely in size and socio-economic
profile, ranging from clusters of isolated homesteads to more organized villages, towns
and cities. Olise (2007) defined a community as a group of people living in a defined
area and sharing some common interest. Examples are towns and villages.
A community can be homogenous that is consisting of people sharing the same culture
e.g villages or heterogeneous that is consisting of people sharing different culture e.g
urban cities.
You can see the different ways a community is defined. Each of these definitions
expresses the idea of living together in a specified area and sharing things in common.
"Community" is important within a public health context. Research demonstrates that:
• locus
• sharing
• action
• ties, and
• diversity
Formal Leaders
These are the first class individuals otherwise known as ceremonial leaders in the
community who are elected, appointed or chosen to rule the community e.g. traditional
rulers namely Chiefs, Ezes, Obas, Emirs, Districts heads and village heads. They are
entitled to remuneration from government.
Informal Leaders
These leaders are unofficially installed but nominated and recognized by members of
the community to lead them in their day to day activities. For example women leaders,
market women leaders, youth leaders, men leaders etc.
4
Opinion Leaders
These are persons authorized and recognized by constituted authorities to give opinions
on various matters concerning the community. They are appointed to hold offices
especially in public bodies and organizations. For example; chairmen of councils,
councilors, pastors, Imams etc. Opinion leaders constitute the leadership composition of
a community. They represent a cross-section of the community in matters of decision
making.
Rationale for community mobilization
Rationale for community mobilization simply means the fundamental reasons or ideas
behind community mobilization. Since community mobilization is an important activity
in health care delivery it must have some rationale behind it. In this unit, we are going to
be discussing the importance of community mobilization and its key elements.
Community mobilization has been defined as a capacity building process through which
community individuals, groups, or organizations plan, carry out and evaluate activities on
a participatory and sustained basis to improve health and other needs on their own
initiative or stimulated by others (Howard-Graham, 2005).Mobilization increases the
participatory decision-making processes by bringing diverse stakeholders to the table. It
enables those people who may not normally be involved in the decision making process to
be a part of the project. Mobilization also fosters strong relationships between Federal
governments, local governments, businesses and community members.
together to achieve goals that are important for that community. Community mobilization
is not something that is done over night, but it is a process that requires time and
commitment from all parties involved. The key to successful mobilisation efforts is
making sure that communities are in the driver’s seat during the process. Mobilisation is
not something that happens to the community rather it is something that the community
does. One of the primary goals of mobilization is to make sure mobilization efforts are
community driven. This allows a community to solve its problems through its own efforts
which is the key to having sustained outcomes within a community.
Goals of Community Mobilisation
• Increase community, individual, and group capacity to identify and satisfy needs
• Increase community level decision-making
• Increase community ownership of programs
• Bring additional resources to the community
• Build on social networks to spread support, commitment and changes in
social norms and behaviours
The rationale is that when people are actively mobilized and committed in taking part in
matters concerning them and their health right from the planning stage, they will take part
in the implementation and evaluation processes.
It has been proved that when health projects are initiated from outside, nobody is interested
in taking good care of such facilities but when the people are involved in such projects
greater care is taken by the community.
One of the rationales for community mobilisation is that it establishes cordial relationship
6
and understanding between the health workers and the community in areas of traditional
beliefs and cultural values.
Community mobilization enables the com munity to develop link with different
organisations. This inter-sectoral collaboration assists the community in times of need. The
rationale for community mobilisation also include the idea of teaching the community how
to solve some of their health development programmes within themselves and not always
waiting for Government to do everything for them.
From the above stated facts you can understand the rationale or the idea behind community
mobilisation in health care delivery as it is pre-requisite for community involvement and
commitment towards health programmes in the community.
You must have at this juncture understood the concept of community Mobilisation.
Consequently, in order to mobilise communities there are steps that should be taken to gain
entry into a community. It should be noted that no one can develop a model of community
Mobilisation steps that would have rigid application in all parts of a country as large and
diverse as Nigeria. However, the following steps represent a minimum that could be
adapted for communities irrespective of whatever setting one finds oneself.
7
There are some critical questions about the community mobilisation strategy that need
to be answered (based on the results of the formative research) before proceeding with a
mobilisation effort. Planning and implementing successful community mobilisation
initiatives requires answering some important questions: These questions include:
Community gets where it wants to be, how will the community be measurably better?
5. What strategies and activities will move the community from where it is to where it
wants to be? What resources can be Mobilised to address these priorities?
6. How will results be assessed?
7. Who is stimulating the process? (Outside of or inside the community)
8. Who will be facilitating the process? (Community member? Community Based
Organisation (CBO) staff/volunteer? Health system worker? Local NGO staff?
International Private Voluntary Organisation (PVO) staff? Government worker outside
health system?)
9. What support structure exists for facilitators? (Training, facilitation materials,
monitoring/supervision, logistics and transport)
10. What external and internal resources are potentially available to contribute to the
effort?
11. What laws, policies, and governance structures are in place to support or limit CM
efforts?
12. To what extent do people have experience participating in community action? Who is
included? Who is left out? Why?
13. If the effort is externally supported, how long is the donor’s time frame? Is it
realistic? What is the potential for longer-term community ownership and sustainability?
With out answers to these strategic questions, community mobilisation is likely to involve
many activities, but not meet community needs or achieve important results.
Success Factors
A review of the programs that have been implemented to date suggests that the primary
ingredients of a successful community mobilisation program using maternal and new born
health as an example consist of the following:
i. program staff including: a program manager, team of facilitators (one or two selected
from a community, or more likely, a team of two to cover approximately 10 communities);
ii. trainer(s)
[Link] budget, depending on where facilitators and managers are based and may
include means of transport (e.g., bicycles or motorcycles) if facilitators need to travel
longer distances
[Link] for developing training and educational materials (e.g., training manuals, picture
cards, booklets, audio-video aids)
v. media budget (for radio shows, street drama, and other media)
10
vi. training budget (depends on distance to training site, number of days, and number
of participants and existing skills/knowledge of trainees); and
vii. Other direct costs associated with office expenses.
The Dos
i. Do it with the community help
ii. Use community expertise
iii. Understand ethnic and cultural differences of communities and build on ethnic and
cultural diversities
iv. Include others in the planning process
v. Develop community partnerships
The Don’ts
i. Do it all for the community
ii. See professionals as the experts
iii. Deny ethnic and cultural differences of a community
iv. Plan mobilization efforts alone
v. Focus solely on individual efforts
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
INTRODUCTION
Community participation is a proven approach to addressing health care issues and has
been very useful in HIV prevention in the United States and in development globally, in
projects ranging from sanitation to child survival, clean water, and health infrastructure.
However, the quality of participation varies from project to project. Moreover, despite the
failure of many health programs designed without the participation of target communities,
some professionals continue to question the value of community members' participating in
program design, implementation, and evaluation.
One of the fundamental Principles of Primary Health Care is the participation of the
community at all stages of development. For communities to be intelligently involved,
they need to have easy access to the right kind of information concerning their health
situation and how they themselves can help to improve some of them.
11
Fig.4.1
• Participation as contribution,
• As organization and
• As empowerment.
WHO (1978) defined community participation as “the process by which individuals and
families assume responsibility for their own health and welfare and develop the capacity to
contribute to their and community’s development” By knowing (understanding) their
circumstances better, they are then motivated to solve their common problems because
they will therefore become agents (participants) of their own development. The role of the
Health Agencies therefore is to explain relevant health issues, advice and provide
necessary information and technology to find solutions to the problems.
12
You will realise that this definition is quite explicit because of the components that make
community participation expedient and a necessary tool for health development in the
community.
Community participation has many direct beneficiaries when carried out with a high
degree of community input and responsibility. Everyone benefits when participating in the
activities. For example, adults and youth might participate in village committees to
improve services. Everyone might watch a play or video and learn from presentations
about local programs. Youth benefit from improved knowledge about contraception and
HIV/AIDS or from increased skill in negotiating condom use, and other community
members’ benefit, too. A truly participatory program involves and benefits the entire
community, including youth, young children, parents, teachers and schools, community
leaders, health care providers, local government officials, and agency administrators.
Programs also benefit because trends in many nations towards decentralization and
democratization also require increased decision making at the community level.
Community participation also poses important challenges. The two major challenges are as
follows:
i. Evaluating Participation
ii. Scaling up Participatory Models
i. Evaluating Participation
A challenge for program planners is how to evaluate community participation. For
example, what should be evaluated (health outcomes, participation levels, improved
capacities, or some combination of these) and how will they be evaluated? While
measuring health outcomes (such as birth rates or sexual health knowledge, attitudes, and
behaviors in a particular age group) may be fairly straight forward, it will be important for
community participation programs also to identify and measure indicators of participation
(Cheetham, 2002).
INTRODUCTION
Since you have acquired an overview of the concept of community participation, let us
at this juncture take a look at the rationale for community participation in health care
delivery. Rationale for community participation in health care delivery simply means
the basic reasons or ideas behind community participation. The need for community
participation cannot be over emphasised. Community mobilisation will be more
sustainable than external solutions that do not fit well with the local situation, culture
and practices. When communities define the problem, set common goals and work
together on their own programs, to achieve the goals, the communities change in ways
that will last after the project ends.
Mobilisation strengthens and enhances the ability of communities to work together to
achieve goals that are important for that community.
Community mobilisation is not something that is done overnight, but it is a process that
14
requires time and commitment from all parties involved. The key to successful
mobilisation efforts is making sure that communities are in the driver’s seat during the
process. Mobilisation is not something that happens to the community; it is something
that the community does. One of the primary goals of mobilisation is to make sure
mobilisation efforts are community driven. This allows a community to solve its
problems through its own efforts which is the key to having sustained outcomes within a
community.
In planning health programmes, the following steps are taken into consideration:
i. Need Assessments
ii. Identification of target audience
iii. Definition of the objectives and desired outcome
iv. Content and subject matter
v. Identification of training tools, activities and outpost
vi. Budget and inputs
vii. Publicity
viii. Implementation
ix. Evaluation and assessment
x. Reporting
Community mobilisation or participation is ensured before the above steps are taken. It is
required especially for the first stage which is the needs assessment.
You can adduce from the facts above that community participation is important in the
achievement of health services coverage and objectives.
Even though some authors have contested that participation makes no difference, the
15
Policies that are sensitive to local circumstances will be more likely to be successful in their
implementation through the involvement of the local community (Curry (1993). Again,
communities that have a say in the development of policies for their locality are much
more likely to be enthusiastic about their implementation (Curry, 1993). It has been found
that participation has a role in enhancing civic consciousness and political maturity that
makes those in office accountable (Golooba- Mutebi, 2004).
Importance of Using Community Participation Approaches in Adolescent Reproductive and
Sexual Health Programming
Programs that ignore the influence of community and family in the lives of young people are,
in fact, creating a nearly impossible situation i.e. asking young people to change their
world on their own. It is unfair to ask youth to change their beliefs and behaviours without
also providing community support for these changes. Especially when reproductive and
sexual health issues are controversial and/or taboo, it is critical to bring other community
members into the process so that they, too, can support healthy change (Cheetham, 2002).
Titles of Committees
per day;
xv. Establish a village health post, where there is none already;
xvi. Ensure that VHW/TBA Kits are stocked to top-up level for drugs.
xvii. Liaise with other officials living in the village to provide healthcare and other
development activities;
xviii. Provide necessary support to VHW for the provision of healthcare services;
xix. Forward local community health plan to ward level.
c. Operational Guidelines
Wards head or Autonomous Clan head (Chairman), but where no such person exists, the most
respectable village head or any other person selected may serve as Committee Chairman.
In such a case, the appointment o Chairman should be left entirely in the hands of
Committee members;
The committee can where necessary co-opt members of health related sectors such as
Secondary School Principals and Primary School Headmasters Agric-Extension Workers
PHCN/Water Works Staff, NGOs. At least 20% of membership will be women and they
should be given effective post such as Head of Health facilities in the area.
[Link] for health /community development plans (village, facility and Wards levels) to
LGA.
v. Mobilise and stimulate active involvement of prominent and other local people in the
planning, implementation and evaluation of projects.
[Link] active role in the supervision and monitoring of the Wards Drug Revolving Fund/B.I.
vii. Raise funds for community programmes when necessary at village,
facilities and Wards levels.
viii. Provide feedback to the rest of the community on how funds raised
are disbursed.
ix. Liaise with government and other voluntary agencies in finding solutions to health, social
and other related problems in the Wards.
x. Supervise the activities of the VHWs/TBAs, CHEWs;
xi. Monitor activities at both the health facilities and village levels;
xii. Oversee the functioning of the Health facilities in the Wards;
xiii. Provide necessary support to VHWs/TBAs;
xiv. Ensure that a Bank account is opened with is liable bank. The signatories will be
as given by the NPHCDA guidelines on the Ward Health Systems document.
xv. Monitoring equipment and inventory of monthly intervals.
xvi. Ensure the proper functioning of the Health Facility using a maintenance plan.
i. Meet monthly;
ii. Record minutes of meetings;
[Link] that minutes of meetings be signed by the Chairman and Secretary after
approval at the next meeting;
iv. Monitor drug revolving at the Ward/Facility level;
v. Ensure that NHMIS forms are correctly filled and submitted on time;
vi. Give feed back of data collected at LGAPHC Management Development Committee
meetings;
vii. Comply with the quorum of members set for starting the meeting;
viii. Authorise the Treasurer to record and keep all monies;
ix. Authorise the Treasurer to spend money only after approval by Committee;
x. Instruct the Treasurer to record all expenditure;
xi. Chose where applicable, the ward referral centre to serve as the meeting venue and
xii. Secretariat of the Ward Development Committee;
xiii. Advise, where there is a Bank Account, signatories to be the Committee
Chairman and Treasurer and if necessary, the Secretary;
xiv. Send minutes of meetings to Local Government Area Committee. The LGA Primary
Health Care Management Committee
The objective of this committee is to provide an overall direction for Primary Health Care in
the LGA.
20
b. Terms of Reference
The Terms of Reference of the LGA PHC Management Development Committee shall be to:
a. Composition
[Link] Coordinator–Chairman
ii. All Assistant PHC Coordinators
[Link] Managers in the LGA.
b. Roles and Responsibilities
i) Plan and budget for implementation of activities of PHC department and present same to
the LGA PHC Management Development Committee;
ii) Identify training needs for Health Workers and make proposals to the LGA PHC
Management Development Committee;
iii) Design minimum acceptable performance standard for monitoring LGA PHC
Services and develop monitoring indicators.
iv)Monitor activities of health workers;
21
c. Operational Guidelines
i) Meet monthly;
ii) Record minutes of meetings;
iii) Adopt minutes of meetings and ensure that the Chairman and Secretary sign them;
iv)Comply with the quorum set for starting meetings.
3. The State PHC Implementation Committee
a. Composition
b. Terms of Reference
of Health and National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA) for
necessary support and assistance ;and
vii. Monitor and evaluate LGA activities at all levels in conjunction
with the NPHCDA.
Here, we want to use maternal and newborn health as an example to illustrate the role of
donors and policymakers in community mobilisation. The role of donors and
policymakers in community mobilisation for maternal and new born health is to ensure
that programs:
i. Integrate community mobilisation into the broader national or regional health plan.
ii. Prioritise communities with the highest mortality and that could benefit most.
[Link] implementing organisations with proven experience and expertise in community
mobilisation and maternal and newborn health.
iv. Engage communities as full partnersinp lanning, implementation, and evaluation.
v. Have sufficient financial support; have realistic timelines; are supported by policies that
promote community participation.
vi. Establish links to external assistance within the health and other sectors.
vii. Establish mechanisms to coordinate the work of all implementing agencies and
communities to ensure that perspectives at all levels are taken into account as strategies
and materials are developed, to maximise program learning and use of resources.
External assistance is most effective when it starts from where people are and facilitates a
process through which interested community members, especially the most vulnerable,
identify and implement strategies and approaches that will reduce mortality within their
local context. Additionally, external facilitators may share valuable information with
community members on effective strategies, practices, and experiences to complement
Local knowledge, making for better informed community decision-making and planning
(Howard-Graham, 2005).
To play these roles successfully, external organisations must establish relationships with
communities built on respect and trust, with faith in the ability of community members to
identify and resolve their challenges in the most appropriate way in the local cultural
setting. Ideally, community mobilisation will work together with other, complementary
program strategies (mass media, services strengthening, and policy advocacy) rather than
on its own. For example, Home Based Life Saving Skills (HBLSS) training may be offered
to interested communities that have limited access to health services; community members
may participate in the development and dissemination of educational messages and
materials; and community members may help design health facilities and health protocols
that take into account their perspectives on quality care (Howard-Graham, 2005).
In order to provide the necessary health services for a community, health care providers
must be able to identify the prevailing health issues or problems and determine their
priorities. In spite of the fact that health care facility is available, it is advisable to continue
to reassess the health situation in the community and plan services that are appropriate to
the priority health problems of the community health workers must possess the requisite
skills for diagnosing the health problems of the community.
23
Meaning of Diagnosis
Diagnosis simply means to determine the nature of something e.g. disease .It is a statement
of the result of findings. Family Medical Compassion defined diagnosis as the process
whereby a particular disease or condition is identified after analysis and consideration of
the relevant parameter ie. symptoms, physical manifestation, results of laboratory tests etc.
Parker (1985) stated that the diagnosis of a disease in an individual patient is a
fundamental idea in medicine. It is based on signs and symptoms and the making of
inferences from them. When this is applied to a community it is known as community
diagnosis.
Kyari (2002) defined community diagnosis as a process of finding out about the health
needs of the community. The focus of community diagnosis is on the identification of the
basic health needs of the community. FMOH (2004) defined community diagnosis as an
organised process involving identified needs, resources, wants, constraints, problems, and
disease patterns, physical, social, cultural and demographic characteristics of the
community. In community diagnosis, the entire community is regarded as a patient
requiring community diagnosis and treatment. Community diagnosis generally refers to the
identification and quantification of health problems in a community as a whole in terms of
mortality and morbidity rates and ratios, and identification of their correlates for the
purpose of defining those at risk or those in need of health care.
The Community Diagnosis Process
[Link] Needs
These needs are those identified by the community itself which require solutions for
example shortage of water supply, poor roads etc.
Community analysis is the process of examining data to define needs strengths, barriers,
opportunities, readiness, and resources. The product of analysis is the community
profile. To analyse assessment data is helpful to categorise the data.
[Link]
ii. Environmental
iii. Health resources and services
iv. Health policies
v. Socioeconomic
vi. Study of target groups.
Community is diagnosed using health indicators. Indicators of health are variables used
for the assessment of community health.
[Link]: they should actually measure what they are supposed to measure.
ii. Reliability and objectivity: the answers should be the same if
measured by different people in similar circumstances.
iii. Sensitivity: they should be sensitive to changes in the situation
concerned.
iv. Specificity: they should reflect changes only in the situation
concerned.
v. Feasibility: they should have the ability to obtain data needed
vi. Relevant: they should contribute to the understanding of the
phenomenon of interest.
1. Mortality indicators
2. Morbidity indicators
3. Disability rates
4. Nutritional status indicators
5. Health care delivery indicators
6. Utilisation rates
7. Indicators of social and mental health
8. Environmental indicators
9. Socio-economic indicators
10. Health policy indicators
11. Indicators of quality of life
12. Other indicators
1. Mortality Indicators
Mortality or death rates are the traditional measures of health status. They are widely used
because there are ready available. For example, death certificate is a legal requirement in
many countries.
Morbidity indicators are morbidity rates or disease rates. Data on morbidity are preferable,
although often difficult to obtain.
3. Disability Indicators
4. Nutritional Indicators
[Link] measurements
ii. Height of children at school entry
iii. Prevalence of low birth weight
iv. Clinical surveys: Anaemia, Hypothyroidism, Night blindness
5. HealthCareDeliveryIndicators
Health care delivery indicators reflect the equity and provision of health care.
[Link]/Population ratio
ii. Doctor/Nurse ratio
iii. Population/Bed ratio
iv. Population/per health center
6. Utilisation Indicators
Utilisation indicators are health care utilisation rates which show the extent of use of
26
health services. It indicates the proportion of people in need of service who actually
receive it in a given period or year.
[Link] of infants who are fully immunised in the 1st year of life
ii. immunisation coverage.
iii. Proportion of pregnant women who receive antenatal care(ANC).
iv. Hospital-beds occupancy rate.
27
Indicators of social and mental health are indirect measures of health status. Often, valid
positive indicators do not often exist so in direct measures are commonly used. Examples
are as follows:
8. Environmental Indicators
[Link] of Pollution
ii. The proportion of people having access to safe water and sanitationfacilities
iii. Vectors density
9. Socio-economic Indicators
Socio-economic indicators are not direct measures of health status. They are used for the
interpretation of health care indicators. Examples are as follows:
Health Policy Indicators assesses the allocation of adequate resources. Examples are:
v. Make a list of cultural practices and attitudes affecting health e.g. those that are useful,
harmful and harmless.
vi. Describe social customs and important festivals of the community.
vii. Make a list of infrastructures in the community, e.g. electricity,
water supply, means of transportation etc.
viii. Collate information from the community.
ix. Conduct interviews and survey of social groups in the
community.
x. Write report using Federal Ministry of Health format.
xi. Give feed back to the LGA/State/FMOH.
Assessment, planning models and frameworks, identifies ten steps in the community health
assessment development process (Department of health, (DOH, 2006)). They are:
Every activity has methods of achieving its goals. There are different ways of gathering
information for community diagnosis.
These includes:
i. Observation,
ii. Interviews,
iii. Group discussion and
iv. Review of existing records.
Observation
It is very important to determine the disease that affect the community through observation
and physical examination, because some diseases are not easily recognised in the
community e.g. Anaemia, dental caries malnutrition, diabetes. In observation you observe
their surroundings, living conditions ,eating habits and life pattern to avoid wrong
impression. In observation also you are to use your eyes to see and also hear some relevant
information with your ears.
30
Interview
The act of interviewing, involves communicating with somebody e.g. household heads,
mothers. These are people who play important role in the community in decision making
on health matters or issues. You should create a good rapport with the person so that
he/she will feel free to talk with you and give you the correct information about what you
need. The interview maybe face to face (verbally) or through questionnaire (filling a
prepared form).
Focused group discussion, unlike interview, is held with groups of people and not an
individual. It is useful in getting information on health needs of the community that is what
they feel as their most pressing problems.
Useful information can be obtained by reviewing existing records particularly when trying
to determine the population of a community, the health facilities sand the health personnel
as well as disease pattern in the area. This information can be obtained from existing
records. These records maybe found in the:
The major aspects that relate to this idea are mainly based on them of the area, which will
also include major settlements, seasons, type of vegetation and location in relation to
other communities.
In order to carry out community diagnosis in a Community or Local Government Area the
use of maps is necessary. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary 6th Edition defined
Map as a drawing or plan of the earth’s surface or part of it, showing countries, towns
etc.
seasons etc. It also ensures the identification of target areas, shows distances to various
facilities and settlements as well as to locate population, and proximity of one settlement
to another. The Local Government Area map including that of towns and villages could
be obtained from the Chairman or the Local Government Council Area office. If such a
map is not available efforts should be made to initiate the drawing of such a map. Using
the characteristics of a map.
Akinsola, (1993) defines Epidemiology as the study of the pattern of distribution of disease
in human populations and the factors which influence the distribution. The information
required in this context will include types of diseases and infections prevalent in the
community, their magnitude and distribution by sex, age, ethnicity, seasonal variations
and other dynamics.
Below are some of the necessary Epidemiological factors to take cognisance of:
Demographic information required for community diagnosis will involve the distribution of
the population by sex, age, ethnic and religious groups as this will determine how many
people that will later require specific adequate and effective services. The basic
information about the demographic profile of the committee is as follows:
These are as include occupations, income level, housing types, and living conditions,
educational level, source and nature of water supply and others. These aspects of the
Socio-economic status of the community will be explored for community diagnosis to be
carried out.
There are certain factors in the community that are detrimental to the health status of the
members of the community such as environmental sanitation, personal hygiene,
attitudinal and behavioral factors, customs and beliefs.
Obionu, (2001) defined environmental sanitation as the process of taming the environment
so that it does not constitute hazard to man. When the environment is not kept dirty, it
becomes hazardous to man and affect the health status of the community.
Ibet-Iragunima, (2006) defined Personal hygiene as all those personal factors which
influence the health and wellbeing of an individual. The factors include lack of
cleanliness, exercise, diet, alcoholism, smoking and others influence the health of man.
The way of life of the people (culture) and their inclination to certain things (beliefs)
also affect them even their lifestyles. The areas of food, female circumcision and
perceptions about the values of health as well as illness behavior should be given
priority attention.
INTRODUCTION
In order to determine the ability of the health services to respond to the problems existing
in the area a careful assessment of the health situation in the community is important.
Information is collected from various sources in the Wards/Local Government Areas to
be covered. Thus, situation analysis will determine the actual status of health in a given
community.
Situation Analysis consists of a comprehensive inventory of health facilities in the LGA, their
distribution, the category of personnel and other existing infrastructure. No health program
can be adequate and effective without the personnel in the system carrying inventory of
what is on ground. Therefore, Situation Analysis is a pre-requisite for effective health
services in the any area. The idea is to tackle the problems identified during community
diagnosis.
FMOH (1996) defined Situation Analysis as the process of finding out the actual status of
health in a given community.
Ransome-Kuti, (1993) defined Situation Analysis as the process of determining the ability of
the health services to respond to the problems identified through community diagnosis.
Ibet–Iragunima, (2006) defined Situation Analysis as the ability to find out the health status
of the community and the available personnel and infrastructure to meet their needs.
The above definitions have emphasised on the health status of the community in which case
certain structure will be in existence or will be required for them to maintain good health
status.
Rationale for situation analysis simply means the fundamental reasons or ideas behind the
process of Situation Analysis. Since Situation Analysis is a necessary condition for
adequate health intervention in the communities, it must have rationale. This unit will help
you to understand as well as state the rationale for situation analysis.
1. To determine the effectiveness of the health services and to respond to the problems found
in the Community or Local Government Area.
2. To provide complete inventory of health facilities in the Local Government Area or
Community.
3. To identify the distribution of health facilities in the Community.
4. To identify category and number of personnel in the facilities.
5. To provide information on the type and adequacy of services provided in all the facilities.
6. To provide information on the number of settlements in each Community or Local
Government Area.
7. To identify the availability of certain basic infrastructure that affect health e.g. roads,
electricity, telephones, portable water supply, schools etc.
8. To provide a complete overview of health services, their strength and weaknesses,
health-related problems and infrastructure.
In an attempt to conduct situation analysis certain steps are required for easy
access to the local government areas and communities.
There are specific instruments designed for this exercise. They include Form
H for household, Form C for children and Form F for married women
under 50years and women who have never been pregnant.
Explanation of Form H
Form H: This is called household questionnaire. These forms contain the list of all
members of the household – their demographic characteristics and also documented
illness episode for the past months.
Discussion on Form C
35
Explanation of Form F
Form F: This is the female questionnaire for female, married or unmarried under fifty (50)
years and women who have never been pregnant. This questionnaire probes into the
number of children each woman in the household had dead or alive. It also inquires into
what material health services the woman had during her last pregnancy.
CONCEPT OF ADVOCACY
Definition of Advocacy
INTRODUCTION
In view of the facts stated above one can adduce that Advocacy is necessary
for the implementation of any health programme or any other programme.
Steps in Advocacy
1. The Chairman
2. The Secretary
3. The Supervisory Councilor for Health
Make initial visit to the governor and other policy makers and discuss intentions and
objectives of the programme as well as for them to launch the programme.
1. The President
2. Members of the National Assembly
3. Chief Executives of Federal Government Agencies and
Parastatals.
Make initial visit to the President, Ministers and members of the National Assembly as
well as other important in the system. Solicit for the launching of the programmes as
well as expatiating on the objectives of the programmes and its relationship to the
national Policy.
PROCESSES AND METHODS FOR THE DESIGN OF ADVOCACY
MESSAGES
The processes of designing Advocacy messages involve a series of things that are done
in order to achieve results of advocacy. Since advocacy is a means of seeking support to
ideas, the methods to be used should be in the mainstream of activities. It will be
necessary for individuals, groups or organisations to formulate concrete action plans to
enable advocacy yield results. This unit will help you understand the processes and
methods for the design of advocacy messages. Before we do this, let us have a view of
what you should learn in this unit, as stated in the objectives
Identification of the Processes and Methods for the Design Advocacy Messages
The most likely processes and methods to be used by individuals, groups or organisations to
design advocacy messages are as follows:
Discussions on the Processes and Methods for the Design of Advocacy Messages
Methods for the design of advocacy message are synonymous with methods used in health
education. These methods are strategies and/or processes through which information is
presented to the target during advocacy.
2. Strategic Alliances among Like-Minded Initiatives: In line with the overall advocacy
strategy and for results to be achieved, strategic alliances among like-minded initiatives
should be encouraged. This alliance which involves people of like-minds could form a
growing alliance especially when it involves members of the target group. This will create
a greater impact too.
3. Joint/Collaborative Activities: Joint activities with members of the target audience could
enhance Advocacy through a working process. In collaborative activities, ideas of the
advocates gradually become cleaver to all involved, ensuring deeper knowledge of the
programme by the target audience. To convince senior officials in government, NGOs, and
other relevant organisations of approaches behind any programme, there need to
participate in interesting programme activities
4. Media (TV, Print, Electronic, Radio) the use of various media, experiences and other
programmes can be shared with members of the target audience. When the main target
audience consist so factors in policy making the media will probably be printed material
and electronic media to enable policy makers understand the ideas behind the intended
programme.
5. Field Visits: This involves the target group being taken out to visit some
programmes/events that need to be carried out concerning the intended
[Link] is ideal for developing policy makers’ attitudes and decision making
on the intended programme.
6. Brainstorming: This is a critical examination of ideas, problems, situations and appraisal
of issues between the campaigners/advocates and the target audience or policy makers
7. Lecture: This involves a straight forward discussion, a pre- planned structured scheme
delivered as a topic in a session. Here, the Advocates talk to the target audience about
the intended programme including its objectives
8. Symposium: This involves presentation of papers on relevant facts about the intended
programme to the target audience in a venue. The idea is to express the full aspects of
the intended, programme for the public to buy the idea and support its implementation.
In order for effective Advocacy to take place, some materials including information,
communication and audio–visual aids are necessary. These materials are essential because,
in order for an individual to accept or adopt a new behaviour he must pass through some
stages which the materials must address.
39
1. Creating awareness
2. Motivating people and promote desired changes in behaviour of the target audience
3. Advocacy materials educate and inform people
4. They explain the need for change
5. Advocacy materials carry information that is easily understood, remembered and retained
for future use.
The operational guidelines for enhancing primary health care delivery through community participation vary across different administrative levels. For instance, Ward Development Committees (WDCs) involve local representatives and health officials working to identify needs, plan, implement, and evaluate community health programs. They coordinate with government agencies, NGOs, and other stakeholders. At the Local Government Area (LGA) level, Management and Technical Committees compose of health officials, representatives from various sectors, and community leaders who provide strategic direction, facilitate training, and manage resources. These committees meet regularly, document their proceedings, and ensure that health initiatives are transparent and accountable .
Community participation contributes to the sustainability of health programs by ensuring that they are locally relevant and culturally appropriate, which in turn encourages community ownership and responsibility. When communities define their problems, set goals, and work towards solutions, the resulting changes are more likely to be sustained even after the program ends. This participatory approach also enhances the effectiveness of health programs by fostering a sense of ownership and responsibility, thus sparking ongoing engagement and support from the community .
The roles and responsibilities of Ward Development Committees (WDCs) align with the principles of community-based health care through their focus on local needs assessment, planning, and implementation of health initiatives in collaboration with community members and other stakeholders. They oversee health program execution, resource mobilization, and evaluation while seeking community feedback, ensuring that services are relevant and responsive to local conditions. This alignment promotes community ownership, accountability, and active involvement, which are central to effective, sustainable community-based health care .
The evaluation of community participation in health programs involves determining what should be evaluated, such as health outcomes, participation levels, or improved capacities, and how these should be measured. This process is challenging as it requires identifying and measuring indicators not only of health outcomes but also of the level and quality of participation. Evaluating participation is complicated by factors such as the local and specific nature of participatory efforts and the difficulty in capturing the nuanced impacts of participatory processes .
Effective integration of community participation into health care program planning and execution requires active engagement of community members from the outset, including in need assessments and setting objectives. Programs should be designed to leverage local knowledge and resources and prioritize communication and feedback between program planners and the community to ensure relevance and adaptability. Clear roles and responsibilities should be established for community members, and training should be provided to enhance their capacity to participate effectively. This approach helps build trust, fosters local ownership, and enhances the program's responsiveness to community needs, leading to more sustainable outcomes .
Successful community mobilization in health care delivery should be guided by principles such as active involvement of community members, acknowledgment, and utilization of local expertise, and sensitivity to ethnic and cultural diversities. It should also include planning with and not merely for the community, thereby fostering partnerships and collaborations. Avoiding seeing professionals as the sole experts and instead building on community strengths ensures relevant and effective mobilization efforts, leading to sustainable health improvements .
The challenges of scaling up community participation models can be addressed by finding a balance between maintaining the intensity of local participation and achieving broader impact across regions. This can involve adapting participatory techniques to be replicable across different contexts, ensuring that essential elements of participation are retained while broadening their scope. Solutions might include developing scalable frameworks that allow for local customization, enhancing communication networks between different community groups to share best practices, and maintaining local leadership in decision-making processes to preserve participatory principles .
The benefits of involving village health workers (VHWs) in community health programs include enhanced access to health services for remote areas, improved health knowledge among community members, and tailored health interventions that address local needs. VHWs can effectively bridge cultural and communication gaps between health services and community members due to their familiarity with the community's context. However, challenges include the need for adequate training and support, potential over-reliance on these workers leading to burnout, and ensuring equitable remuneration and recognition for their contributions to sustain their motivation and commitment .
To enhance the capacity of community members in health program decision-making, strategic approaches such as providing education and training on health issues, decision-making processes, and leadership skills can be adopted. Facilitating access to relevant information and resources, ensuring inclusive participation regardless of age, gender, or social status, and creating structures that empower community members to take leadership roles are also crucial. Moreover, fostering a supportive environment through mentorship and partnerships with local and external stakeholders can significantly boost the decision-making capacities of community members .
Community participation can foster multi-sectoral collaboration by encouraging the involvement of various sectors that influence health outcomes, such as education, agriculture, and local governance, in the planning and implementation of health programs. By doing so, it aligns different sectors towards a common goal of improving community health and resource management. Community-driven initiatives typically lead to better utilization of local resources, reduce redundancy in service delivery, and facilitate more coherent and comprehensive health strategies .