0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views2 pages

Science Project Evaluation Rubric

The rubric describes three categories for evaluating school science projects: introduction, quality of information, and demonstration/results. The work is assessed as excellent, good, or acceptable. To be excellent, the introduction must clearly explain the purpose, hypothesis, and relevance of the project. The quality of information requires a complete understanding of the topic with evidence to support each point. The demonstration/results must clearly accept or reject the hypothesis with justification.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views2 pages

Science Project Evaluation Rubric

The rubric describes three categories for evaluating school science projects: introduction, quality of information, and demonstration/results. The work is assessed as excellent, good, or acceptable. To be excellent, the introduction must clearly explain the purpose, hypothesis, and relevance of the project. The quality of information requires a complete understanding of the topic with evidence to support each point. The demonstration/results must clearly accept or reject the hypothesis with justification.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Rubric for evaluating school science project

CATEGORY EXCELLENT GOOD JOB ACCEPTABLE

Introduction It clearly and detailed explains the purpose, hypothesis It explains the purpose, hypothesis, and relevance of the project. It generally explains only one or two of the
and the relevance of the project. ambiguous manner. following elements:
Title.
Hypothesis.
Relevance of the project.
Quality of Complete understanding of the topic. Good understanding of certain parts of the subject. Limited understanding of the topic
the information Each main point supported by relevant facts, Each main point supported by relevant facts, Main points without support.
statistics or examples. statistics or examples, but dubious relevance of Inaccuracy in answering the questions
Accuracy in answering all the questions posed some. posed on the subject.
about the topic. Accuracy in answering certain questions posed about
the topic.
Demonstrate clearly and Clearly and attractively demonstrate a Does not demonstrate the concepts of
Demonstration attract one or more scientific concepts. scientific concept. Physics or the physical representation of some
of the prototype or It is original and creative in its development and application. It has reasonable originality and creativity in law.
It has representativeness and complies with the its development and application. It is little original and creative in its development.
experiment purposes for which it was conceived. It has reasonable representation and fulfills and application.
The contribution or solution provided to the problem is clear. with the purposes for which it was conceived. It has limited representativeness and complies
The contribution is reasonably clear or with the purposes for which it was
solution that addresses the problem.
conceived.

Their contribution or solution is not very clear.


give to the problem.
Results and The acceptance or the The acceptance or the expression is stated reasonably. The acceptance is expressed with little clarity.
conclusions rejection of the hypothesis. rejection of the hypothesis. or the rejection of the
The justification for the decision made is given. The justification for the decision made is given. hypothesis.
regarding the hypothesis, taking as regarding the hypothesis, taking as The justification of the decision made is given.
reference all obtained data. reference the majority of the obtained data. regarding the hypothesis
Describe the benefits that it could have Reasonably describe the benefits that taking as a reference some
contribution that it proposes. I could have the contribution that you propose. data obtained.
Describe what was learned in the development of the Reasonably describe what was learned in the Describe a little the benefits that it could
project based on the level of understanding project development based on the degree to have the contribution that is proposed.
of problem-solving tools of understanding the tools of Describe a little of what you learned in the
and the modeling. problem solving and modeling. development of the project based on the
degree of comprehension of the
solution tools
problems and modeling

Rubric for evaluating school science project


CATEGORY EXCELENTE GOOD JOB ACCEPTABLE

Introduction It clearly and detailed explains the purpose, The purpose, hypothesis, and relevance of the project are explained. Only one or two of them is explained in general.
hypothesis and the relevance of the project. ambiguously. the following elements:
Title.
Hypothesis.
Relevance of the project.
Quality of Complete understanding of the topic. Good understanding of certain parts of the topic. Limited understanding of the topic
the information Each main point supported by facts Each main point supported by relevant facts, Main points without support.
relevant statistics or examples. statistics or examples, but questionable relevance of Inaccuracy in answering the questions
Accuracy in answering all questions some. posed on the topic.
posed on the topic. Accuracy in answering certain questions posed
on the topic.
Clearly demonstrate and Clearly and attractively demonstrate a No demuestra los conceptos de
Demonstration attractive one or more scientific concepts. scientific concept. Physics or the physical representation of some
of the prototype or It is original and creative in its development and application. It has reasonable originality and creativity in to the law.
experiment It has representativeness and meets the its development and application. It is not very original and creative in its
purposes for which it was conceived. Has reasonable representativeness and complies development and application.
The contribution or solution she provides is clear to the with the purposes for which it was conceived. It has limited representativeness and
problem. The contribution is reasonably clear or meets the goals for the
solution that solves the problem. what was conceived.
Their contribution or solution is somewhat unclear.
what gives the problem.
Results and The acceptance or the expression is made clear. The acceptance or the expression is stated in a reasonable manner. It is expressed with little clarity.
conclusions rejection of the hypothesis. rejection of the hypothesis. acceptance or rejection of the
The justification for the decision made is given. The justification for the decision made is given. hypothesis.
regarding the hypothesis, taking as regarding the hypothesis, taking as The justification for the decision taken is given.
reference all obtained data. reference the majority of the obtained data. regarding the hypothesis
Describe the benefits that it could have Reasonably describe the benefits that taking as a reference some
contribution that it proposes. I could have the contribution that you propose. data obtained.
Describe what you learned in the development of the Reasonably describe what was learned in the Describe a little the benefits that
project based on the degree of understanding project development based on the degree I could have the contribution you propose.
of problem-solving tools understanding of the tools of Describe a little what was learned in the
and modeling. problem solving and modeling. project development based on the
degree of understanding of the
solution tools
problems and modeling

You might also like