BDC Recording Procedure: Sap Sm35
Uploaded by
vidyadhar_kBDC Recording Procedure: Sap Sm35
Uploaded by
vidyadhar_k- BDC Recording Procedure
- Procedure of Writing a BDC
- Procedure of Transfer BDC Using Batch Input
- BDC Concept and Methods
- Method of Doing BDC
- BDCDATA Structure & Sample
- Procedure to Write a Data Transfer Program
Common questions
Powered by AIPreparing a data transfer program for BDC involves several strategic steps within SAP. Firstly, a thorough analysis of the existing data structure is crucial, identifying necessary mappings and conversions to conform to SAP data structures . This involves generating the required SAP data structures using tools like the ABAP Dictionary, ensuring that field types and lengths align between systems . The next step is to write the actual data transfer program, either in ABAP or as an external program, with focus on correct data reading and conversion logic . Creating a sequential file to facilitate batch input processing is essential, focusing on correct logical formatting, typically in ASCII or EBCDIC format . Error-checking mechanisms must be ingrained in the program to validate data entries and handle exceptions. Finally, after loading the data, validation against processing logs or messages is necessary to ensure all data is successfully integrated . These steps ensure a structured approach to data integration, addressing both data integrity and process efficiency challenges inherent in BDC operations.
The classical batch input method creates a batch input session where transaction data is recorded and processed. It supports session management, detailed logging, and error correction through interactive correction sessions. Each session must be closed before another is opened . This method is more robust in terms of error handling as it allows for the correction of data errors post-processing . In contrast, the CALL TRANSACTION method processes transactions immediately without creating a session, which is faster but offers limited error recovery options . There is no detailed logging or interactive correction available, making it less suitable for complex transactions where error recovery is critical . The implications are that classical batch input is more suitable for transactions requiring detailed monitoring and error handling, whereas CALL TRANSACTION is preferable for scenarios demanding higher speed and lower overhead without extensive error management .
The choice of CALL DIALOG for BDC over BATCH INPUT SESSION or CALL TRANSACTION comes with certain implications. CALL DIALOG is characterized by synchronous processing and the lack of a separate batch input processing log, making it less suitable for scenarios requiring detailed audit trails and error tracking . Unlike BATCH INPUT SESSION, which provides robust error handling and transaction replay capabilities, CALL DIALOG lacks these features, limiting error correction and auditing . Also, it doesn’t allow for batch processing, as it deals with direct transaction screens and updates occur only when the calling program executes a commit operation . Despite these limitations, CALL DIALOG might be suitable in use cases involving limited transactions, requiring immediate processing without the need for detailed logging or manual error rectification, such as one-off, urgent data entry tasks . Its synchronous nature allows for real-time transaction processing, making it useful where immediate application feedback is necessary, but the complexity and volume of data do not justify the use of other methods .
Writing a batch input program in ABAP poses several challenges. Primarily, ensuring accurate data mapping from source to SAP structures can be complex, requiring thorough analysis of both source data and target SAP data structures . Addressing these challenges involves leveraging the ABAP Dictionary to generate necessary data structures and accurately mapping each field . Error handling is another significant challenge, with the need to anticipate data conversion issues and implement comprehensive validation mechanisms within the program . This necessitates integrating robust error-checking routines and testing the BDC program extensively to identify potential data discrepancies or transaction failures prior to live execution. Additionally, performance can be a concern when processing large volumes of data. Optimizing loops, leveraging efficient data structures, and utilizing parallel processing where possible can mitigate performance issues . These strategies, coupled with detailed planning and testing, ensure the successful implementation of an ABAP-based batch input program.
Pre-defined batch input programs in SAP are designed to handle standard data transfer needs, simplifying the implementation process by providing ready-to-use templates and structures for common transactions . They ensure compliance with SAP standard practices and reduce the programming effort required for basic data uploads. However, custom BDC programs become necessary when specific business requirements or unique transaction scenarios are not adequately addressed by these standard solutions. Situations requiring customized error handling, complex data transformations, or integration with non-standard SAP modules can necessitate bespoke programs, as the pre-defined options may lack flexibility to adapt to unique field mappings, data conversions, or business logic that specific organizational processes demand . Moreover, when performance optimizations or tailored logging and reporting are required, custom solutions provide the necessary adaptability that standard programs may not offer .
The NODATA character in BDC programs plays a critical role in handling fields that are not intended to be modified during transaction execution. Its primary function is to signal that a specific field in the transaction should remain unchanged when there is no corresponding input value provided in the BDCDATA structure . Its use is essential to avoid unintentional overwriting or alteration of existing data in the SAP system. By initializing fields with the NODATA character, BDC programs effectively differentiate between empty fields meant for data entry and those that should preserve their current state . The consequence of this setup is to maintain data integrity, ensuring that only specified fields are impacted by the batch input process, thus preventing data corruption or loss during the execution of BDC sessions . This approach facilitates more precise data management, especially when dealing with large datasets where certain transactional fields must remain static across multiple records.
Transaction code SM35 is crucial in SAP for managing and executing BDC sessions. It provides a comprehensive interface to view, process, and handle batch input sessions . The key steps involved include initially navigating to SM35 where existing sessions can be reviewed. Users can then select a specific session, allowing for detailed insight into recorded data, cursor movements, and changes made during the session. Execution can proceed in batch mode or in the foreground, depending on user preference . SM35 allows users to handle sessions interactively, providing options to correct and reprocess erroneous data directly. Additionally, it supports the generation of detailed logs for troubleshooting purposes, thereby serving as an all-in-one tool for overseeing BDC operations . The execution flexibility and detailed logging features of SM35 make it an essential part of the BDC workflow for ensuring successful data transfers and transaction executions.
The BDCDATA structure in SAP systems is crucial for executing and managing BDC processes, serving as a blueprint for data entry and transaction automation. Its components include fields such as PROGRAM, DYNPRO, DYNBEGIN, FNAM, and FVAL . PROGRAM stores the name of the SAP application program, DYNPRO denotes the screen number, and DYNBEGIN indicates the start of a screen within BDC data processing. FNAM identifies the specific screen field to be populated, while FVAL contains the value to be entered into the field . These elements collectively allow for structured and systematic data input, ensuring each screen and field in a transaction is handled as per predefined instructions. BDCDATA facilitates converting conceptual data structures into actionable steps that a BDC program can execute, supporting batch input sessions or CALL TRANSACTION methods by accurately populating and managing data fields .
In a BDC program, the MOVE and APPEND statements are fundamental for constructing the BDCDATA structure. MOVE is utilized to assign values from source fields to the corresponding target fields within the BDCDATA record. This step is crucial for setting screen identifiers, field names, and input values appropriately . APPEND is then used to add this fully prepared record to the BDCDATA internal table. It signals the end of setting values for a single record and stores the record into the BDCDATA structure for batch input processing . The interaction between MOVE and APPEND allows a BDC program to systematically build each piece of the BDCDATA one transaction at a time, line-by-line. This method ensures that all necessary details for data entry, such as screen fields and values, are correctly placed in sequence, facilitating accurate batch processing. This systematic filling and appending ensure the data is structured correctly, enabling seamless execution of the BDC procedure across the designated transaction screens .
In the context of BDC batch job management, the function BACKGROUND PROCESSING JOBVARIANT SCHEDULE is used for scheduling a job for execution. It requires specifying an ABAP program, a variant, and a start time to execute the program . This function is focused on planning and ensuring that batch jobs are executed according to a predefined schedule. In contrast, JOBVARIANT_OVERVIEW provides management capabilities for the job after it has been scheduled and executed. It allows users to display job logs, view spool output, and manage inactive jobs, offering a more retrospective and administrative function compared to the scheduling focus of JOBVARIANT SCHEDULE . Thus, while the former is primarily concerned with job initiation, the latter deals with ongoing job management and monitoring post-scheduling.
