Computational Modeling and Stochastic
Simulation of a Discrete-Event System:
The Configurable Die Roll
Executive Summary
This report details the design, algorithmic analysis, and implementation strategies for a
mini-project program that simulates the rolling of a die. The project’s core requirement involves
establishing customizable minimum and maximum outcome values (defaulting to 1 to 6),
generating a pseudo-random integer within this defined domain, displaying the result, and
maintaining continuous operation through a user-controlled iteration loop. The architecture is
modular, separating Parameter Configuration, the Random Number Generation Core
(RNG-Core), and the Input/Output and Control Loop (I/O-Loop). A critical technical decision
guided this design: prioritizing statistically robust, modern Pseudo-Random Number Generators
(PRNGs) over legacy methods to ensure the simulated outcomes adhere strictly to the required
uniform probability distribution, thus guaranteeing the fidelity of the stochastic model.
I. Introduction to Discrete Event Simulation: The Dice
Roll Model
I.A. Defining the Simulation Objective and Scope
The objective of this project is the construction of a simple, interactive console-based
application capable of simulating a discrete stochastic event—the roll of a customizable die.
This model is intended to demonstrate core programming principles, including random number
generation, user input handling, and iterative process control.
The project requirements delineate four essential features:
1. Customizable Range: The user must be able to specify the lower (Min_{Value}) and
upper (Max_{Value}) bounds for the die roll, with a default standard range of 1 to 6.
2. Stochastic Generation: A number must be generated such that it is statistically
non-deterministic and falls inclusively within the established [Min_{Value}, Max_{Value}]
range.
3. Output Display: The generated outcome must be clearly presented to the user.
4. Continuous Operation: The system must incorporate a mechanism to allow the user to
roll the die repeatedly until they choose to terminate the program.
I.B. Conceptual Model: A Stochastic System with Uniform Distribution
A traditional die roll is fundamentally a stochastic system characterized by a uniform probability
distribution. If N represents the number of sides, every outcome X has an equal probability of
occurrence, where P(X) = 1/N. The success of this computational simulation, therefore, is
entirely dependent on the quality of the underlying randomness source.
The simulation must generate synthetic numbers that statistically adhere to this ideal uniformity.
If the selected random number generator introduces statistical bias—meaning certain numbers
are generated more or less frequently than others—the simulated die is analogous to a
physically "loaded" or unfair die. This underlying need for uniform probability requires careful
selection and implementation of the RNG-Core, which is the singular most important element in
ensuring the mathematical accuracy of the simulation.
I.C. Report Structure and Documentation Methodology
The documentation follows a formal project methodology structure, comparable to academic
submissions for engineering partial fulfillment. The report progresses from system objectives
and conceptual modeling to detailed architecture, analysis of the random number generation
theory, control flow design (algorithm and pseudo-code), and concludes with a comparative
review of implementation strategies across different programming languages. This rigorous
structure ensures that not only is the function achieved, but the underlying technical decisions
are critically examined and justified.
II. System Architecture and Design Specifications
II.A. High-Level Modular Breakdown and Interdependence
The simulation system is logically organized into three distinct, loosely coupled modules,
adhering to the principle of separation of concerns inherent in robust computational design. This
approach ensures that modifications to one area of functionality do not necessitate changes
across the entire system, enhancing maintainability and scalability.
The three modules are:
1. Parameter Configuration (P-Config): Responsible for defining and managing the
numerical constraints (Min_{Value}, Max_{Value}).
2. RNG Core: The engine responsible for producing the raw stochastic output and mapping
it to the defined range.
3. Input/Output & Control Loop (I/O-Loop): Responsible for managing user interaction,
input validation, result display, and the continuous execution cycle.
By distinguishing the RNG-Core from the configuration and control mechanisms, the underlying
generator (e.g., swapping a legacy generator for a high-quality Mersenne Twister engine) can
be replaced or updated without affecting the user interface or the logic that governs the
simulation's boundaries.
Table: System Module Responsibilities
Module Primary Function Technical Responsibility
Parameter Configuration Initializes and manages Range binding calculation (N =
(P-Config) Min_{Value} and Max_{Value} Max-Min+1).
(Default 1, 6).
RNG Core Generates the next Seed management, entropy
pseudo-random integer. source handling, distribution
mapping.
I/O & Control Loop Manages user prompts, Input validation, continuous
displays results, and controls execution control (while loop).
iteration.
II.B. Defining Parameters: Custom Minimum and Maximum Bounds
The flexibility of the die simulation is governed by the Min_{Value} and Max_{Value} inputs. By
default, these values are set to 1 and 6, respectively, simulating a standard six-sided die. If the
user customizes these values, the system must calculate the size of the outcome space,
Range_{Size}, using the formula:
The RNG-Core must then ensure that the generated pseudo-random value, R, is mapped
correctly such that Min_{Value} \le R \le Max_{Value}. This mapping must be executed in a
manner that preserves the uniformity of the stochastic output across the entire span of the
defined range.
II.C. Input Validation and Error Handling Architecture
A crucial component of the I/O-Loop is robust input validation. The system must ensure data
integrity at two primary interaction points:
1. Continuous Control Input: When prompting the user to roll again, the input must be
checked against the acceptable command set (e.g., 'R' for roll, 'Q' for quit). Invalid input
must trigger an error message and a re-prompt, preventing program termination or
unforeseen state changes.
2. Configuration Input: If the user elects to customize the Min_{Value} and Max_{Value}
parameters, the input must be validated as numerical. Furthermore, logical constraints
must be enforced, primarily ensuring that Max_{Value} is strictly greater than Min_{Value}.
Failure to validate numerical input can lead to critical execution errors, while failure to
validate constraints can lead to zero or negative range sizes, rendering the stochastic
model invalid.
III. Foundations of Stochastic Generation (PRNG
Theory)
III.A. The Deterministic Nature of Simulation: PRNG vs. TRNG
Computational simulations, including the die roll model, rely overwhelmingly on
Pseudo-Random Number Generators (PRNGs). PRNGs are mathematical algorithms that
produce sequences of numbers that appear random but are, in fact, entirely deterministic. They
start from an initial numerical value, known as the seed, and generate the subsequent
sequence.
This contrasts sharply with True Random Number Generators (TRNGs), which source entropy
from unpredictable physical processes, such as atmospheric static, thermal noise fluctuations in
circuits, or even quantum phenomena. While TRNGs offer maximal unpredictability, they are
often cost-inefficient and are typically reserved for cryptographic applications. For
non-cryptographic simulations like a die roll, high-quality PRNGs are sufficient, provided their
characteristics are well understood.
A critical implication of using PRNGs is the predictability paradox: if the seed and the algorithm's
internal state are known, the entire sequence of future numbers can be predicted, and all past
numbers can be retrodicted. While this is acceptable for a single-user simulation, it represents a
severe security vulnerability in multi-user or high-stakes environments. Cryptographically Secure
PRNGs (CSPRNGs) are explicitly designed to resist this type of cryptanalysis, ensuring that
even if a future state is revealed, the sequence cannot be retrodicted.
III.B. Analysis of PRNG Quality in Non-Cryptographic Applications
The quality of a PRNG in a simulation context is measured by its statistical uniformity and the
length of its sequence period before repetition occurs.
Legacy PRNG implementations, such as the standard C library's rand(), often rely on simple
Linear Congruential Generators (LCGs). These generators typically exhibit statistical
non-uniformity, particularly when modulo arithmetic is used for range scaling. This can lead to
statistical bias where the lower outcomes in a defined range are generated slightly more
frequently than the higher ones, compromising the fundamental uniform distribution of the dice
roll.
Proper seed initialization is necessary to ensure that the simulation does not produce the same
sequence of rolls every time the program executes. The common practice involves seeding the
PRNG using the system time, as implemented in many foundational programming examples.
However, seeding with system time relies on the limited granularity of the clock. If the program is
initialized and restarted rapidly within the same time tick, it may generate identical sequences,
reducing the perceived randomness.
III.C. Choosing the Right Tool for the Job: C++11 <random>
Superiority
For rigorous computational simulation, the choice of the random number generation technique
must guarantee statistical uniformity. Modern C++ (C++11 and later) provides the superior
<random> library, offering a clear advantage over legacy C functions.
This library separates the engine—the source of raw pseudo-random bits, such as std::mt19937
(Mersenne Twister), known for its long period and high quality—from the distribution object. The
std::uniform_int_distribution<> object is specifically designed to model the exact uniform
probability space required for the die simulation.
By using the distribution object, the program maps the raw engine output to the defined range
[Min_{Value}, Max_{Value}] without resorting to unreliable modulo arithmetic. This architecture
eliminates the potential for modulo bias and guarantees superior statistical performance,
constituting the necessary technical achievement for a statistically reliable simulation model.
Table: RNG Classification and Suitability
RNG Type Mechanism Suitability for Dice Cryptographic
Simulation Security
Legacy PRNG (e.g., C Mathematical algorithm Basic proof of concept; None.
rand() LCG) (short period, often prone to statistical bias.
low-quality).
Modern PRNG (e.g., Advanced Recommended for None (State is
C++ mt19937) mathematical algorithm statistically rigorous predictable).
(long period, high simulations.
quality).
CSPRNG (e.g., Complex algorithm Overkill for simple dice; High (Resists prediction
/dev/random, mixing high-entropy required for secure and retrodiction).
Windows CNG) sources. applications.
IV. Algorithmic Control Flow and Iteration Logic
IV.A. Designing the Continuous Gameplay Loop (The "Roll Again"
Structure)
The requirement for repeated simulation necessitates a persistent execution structure, achieved
through a control loop. In software development, especially for interactive systems, this is
modeled by the Game Loop pattern, which dictates a continuous cycle of input processing, state
updating, and output rendering.
For this simulation, the I/O-Loop acts as the primary control mechanism. It utilizes an outer while
(condition) loop that remains active as long as the user elects to continue rolling. The loop
structure is defined by the following sequential steps within each iteration:
1. Input: Prompt the user for a command (e.g., 'R' to roll or 'Q' to quit).
2. Update State (RNG-Core): If the input is 'R', the RNG-Core generates the new
pseudo-random outcome.
3. Render Output: Display the result of the roll.
4. Loop Condition Check: If the input was 'Q', the loop condition is set to false, and the
program terminates; otherwise, the loop iterates again.
This loop design ensures the simulation only ends upon explicit user command, preventing
accidental termination and maximizing interactivity.
IV.B. Detailed Flowchart Analysis of the Simulation Program
The algorithmic flow is best visualized through a flowchart, which provides a clear
representation of initialization, decision points, and repetitive processes.
Flowchart Key Components:
1. START and Initialization: The program begins by setting the default Min_{Value}=1 and
Max_{Value}=6, and initializing the PRNG (e.g., seeding with system time).
2. Loop Sentinel Decision: The primary decision diamond checks the rolling condition. The
system prompts the user, "Roll Again?".
3. Process and Calculation: If the decision is affirmative, the RNG-Core is activated,
calculating R within the [Min, Max] bounds.
4. Output: The generated result R is displayed.
5. Termination: If the user elects not to roll again, the flow exits the loop and terminates the
program (END).
This architecture emphasizes that the RNG core is re-executed only upon positive user
confirmation within the loop, guaranteeing that a new, distinct outcome is generated for every
discrete roll event.
IV.C. Pseudo-code Implementation for Dice Simulation Logic
The following pseudo-code provides a language-agnostic blueprint for the required functionality,
specifically addressing the configurable range and the control loop structure.
FUNCTION Initialize_RNG(seed_time):
Seed the underlying PRNG generator using an appropriate entropy
source (e.g., system clock)
FUNCTION Roll_Die(Min_Val, Max_Val):
// Calculate range size
Range_Size = Max_Val - Min_Val + 1
// Generate uniform number R in
// Note: The specific generation method depends on the chosen RNG
core (e.g., rand() % N or distribution object)
R_Offset = Generate_Random_Int()
// Map offset to the desired range [Min_Val, Max_Val]
Result = R_Offset MOD Range_Size + Min_Val
Return Result
FUNCTION Main_Simulation_Loop():
Initialize_RNG(Current_Time)
// Default values, can be modified via P-Config module (omitted
for brevity)
Min_Bound = 1
Max_Bound = 6
Continue_Rolling = TRUE
OUTPUT "Welcome to the Configurable Die Roller."
WHILE Continue_Rolling:
OUTPUT "Enter 'R' to Roll the die (D" + Max_Bound + "), or 'Q'
to Quit."
Input_Choice = Get_User_Input().ToUpperCase()
IF Input_Choice == 'R':
Result = Roll_Die(Min_Bound, Max_Bound)
OUTPUT "--- ROLLED ---"
OUTPUT "Result: " + Result
OUTPUT "----------------"
ELSE IF Input_Choice == 'Q':
Continue_Rolling = FALSE
ELSE:
OUTPUT "Invalid command. Please enter 'R' or 'Q'."
OUTPUT "Simulation terminated. Goodbye."
V. Implementation Deep Dive and Language
Comparison
This section evaluates the implementation of the RNG-Core across three common programming
paradigms, demonstrating the trade-offs between legacy simplicity, statistical precision, and
rapid development.
V.A. Model 1: Procedural Implementation in C (Legacy Approach)
The C procedural model is often employed in introductory projects, utilizing the standard library.
● RNG Technique: The implementation relies on the functions from stdlib.h (rand()) and
time.h (time(0)). The srand(time(0)) function seeds the generator, ensuring variable
sequences between runs.
● Range Mapping: Range generation is achieved using the modulo operator and an offset,
following the traditional formula :
● Technical Limitation: The primary limitation of this model is the aforementioned
statistical bias. If the maximum output of the underlying generator (RAND\_MAX) is not
significantly larger than, or an exact multiple of, the required Range_{Size}, the resulting
distribution will be subtly non-uniform (modulo bias). While acceptable for basic proofs of
concept, this method is insufficient for simulations requiring high statistical fidelity.
V.B. Model 2: Object-Oriented Implementation in Modern C++
(Statistical Precision)
This model represents the technically superior choice for achieving a statistically uniform
distribution, leveraging the robust features of the C++ <random> library.
● RNG Technique: This approach mandates the separation of the random engine from the
distribution. The std::mt19937 engine is selected for its high quality and long period,
initialized with a high-entropy seed (e.g., from std::random_device or time(0) if
random_device is unavailable).
● Distribution Mapping: The std::uniform_int_distribution<> distrib(min, max) object is
instantiated specifically for the defined range. When called (distrib(gen)), the distribution
object handles the internal scaling and mapping of the engine's output, preventing the
statistical non-uniformity and modulo bias that plague the legacy C approach.
● Conclusion: For any simulation where statistical accuracy is paramount, this modern
C++ approach is the required standard, demonstrating a commitment to statistical rigor
over programming simplicity.
V.C. Model 3: Rapid Prototyping in Python
Python provides the simplest path for rapid prototyping, often abstracting away the underlying
complexities of RNG management.
● RNG Technique: The implementation relies on the standard random module and the
high-level function [Link](min, max).
● Abstraction and Fidelity: Python's randint function internally utilizes high-quality
algorithms (often based on Mersenne Twister) and handles the seeding and range
mapping efficiently. This method yields statistically good results for standard dice
simulations while minimizing required boilerplate code.
● Scalability Consideration: While highly efficient for simple execution, the high level of
abstraction can pose challenges if the simulation were to scale to require specialized
hardware true random number sources (TRNG) or integration with custom cryptographic
libraries, where direct management of entropy sources and seeding processes (as
possible in C++) is often necessary.
VI. Conclusion and Recommendations for Scalability
VI.A. Summary of Achieved Design Goals
The design successfully meets all foundational criteria: providing a customizable range
(Min/Max), utilizing a stochastic generation core, displaying the result, and maintaining
continuous operation via a robust I/O control loop. The analysis confirms that while basic
implementation is straightforward in any modern language (C, C++, Python), achieving
statistical fidelity—the core requirement of any robust simulation—requires the technical
precision offered by modern libraries such as C++11's <random>. The primary achievement lies
in detailing the architecture necessary to guarantee a uniformly distributed outcome.
VI.B. Recommendations for Future Work
To enhance the technical merit and operational complexity of the simulation, the following
recommendations are made for future development:
1. Multi-Dice Roll Extension: The program should be expanded from simulating a single
die (1dN) to accepting multiple dice and calculating the aggregate result (e.g., DdN
notation, like 3d6). This addition requires implementing a dedicated scoring or summation
module within the Update State phase of the game loop.
2. Enhanced Visual Output: The current implementation provides purely numerical output.
Integrating ASCII art graphics to visually represent the faces of the die corresponding to
the generated number would significantly improve the user experience and align with
typical simulation game report standards.
3. Quantitative Statistical Validation: To provide rigorous proof of the simulation’s
accuracy, a statistical logging module should be added. This module would record results
over a large sample (e.g., 10,000 rolls) and perform a Chi-squared (\chi^2) goodness-of-fit
test. This test would formally verify that the generated distribution (using the chosen
PRNG, like mt19937) does not statistically deviate from a true uniform distribution,
thereby providing quantitative scientific validation of the simulation model.
VI.C. Implications for More Complex Computational Modeling
The principles governing this mini-project are directly transferable to significantly more complex
computational modeling scenarios. The continuous operational structure developed here is
essentially the universal "Game Loop" or simulation engine utilized in physics modeling,
financial projections, and operational research. Furthermore, the rigorous attention paid to
correct seeding (avoiding repeated sequences) and the use of mathematically appropriate
distribution objects (ensuring true uniformity) are prerequisites for reliable input in any Monte
Carlo simulation. Mastery of these fundamentals is essential before undertaking complex
discrete-event simulations, where non-uniformity in input can lead to cascading errors in output
and flawed predictive models.
Works cited
1. Random Numbers, Distributions, and Games (Part 1) – A BIT OF MYSTERY,
[Link] 2. How to Generate
Random Value by Dice Roll in C++? - GeeksforGeeks,
[Link] 3. Project
structure - Game Technology Center,
[Link] 4.
SIMULATION*GAMES*-* A*CONCISE*INTRODUCTION*TO*THE* DESIGN*PROCESS* -
ISAGA,
[Link]
[Link] 5. Game Loop · Sequencing Patterns,
[Link] 6. Game Loop Fundamentals: A 2025
Guide for Developers - Blog - Meshy AI, [Link] 7. Dice Roll
Tutorial - teachComputing - TeachWithICT, [Link] 8.
Flowchart Loops Explained: Types & Examples + Free Templates | Creately,
[Link] 9. Pseudo-Random vs. True Random -
Bo Allen, [Link] 10. How does my PRNG implementation
differ from the one I'm trying to copy? - Stack Overflow,
[Link]
e-one-im-trying-to-copy 11. True Random vs. Pseudorandom Number Generation - wolfSSL,
[Link] 12. Understanding
random number generators, and their limitations, in Linux - Red Hat,
[Link]
linux 13. Cryptographically secure pseudorandom number generator - Wikipedia,
[Link] 14.
C++ Simple Dice roll - how to return multiple different random numbers - Stack Overflow,
[Link]
-random-numbers 15. CLASS 8: FLOWCHARTS – WHILE LOOPS - College of Engineering |
Oregon State University,
[Link]
16. Mini Project Dice | PDF - Scribd,
[Link] 17. Race Up If Mountain! -
Digital Technologies Hub,
[Link]
df 18. Dice in while loop - python - Stack Overflow,
[Link] 19. Dice Rolling Simulator
using Python-random - GeeksforGeeks,
[Link] 20. Build a
Dice-Rolling Application With Python, [Link] 21. D. Final
Algorithm, Flowchart, or Pseudocode | 23576 ENGR 1181SDP AU18 Group D,
[Link] 22. Dice Game -
Pseudo Code Library - Bag of Cows, [Link]
23. Rolling the DICE (Design, Interpret, Compute, Estimate): Interactive Learning of Biostatistics
With Simulations - PMC, [Link]
