NS Email Address for Mailing Database

Updated: November 6, 2007

[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
NS Email Address for Mailing Database
Updated: November 6, 2007

[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
chris745252gmail.com [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
NS Email Address for Mailing Database
Updated: November 6, 2007

[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
Father: [email protected] or Joann: vatchaj [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
NS Email Address for Mailing Database
Updated: November 6, 2007

[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
jennyheim2yahoo.com [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
NS Email Address for Mailing Database
Updated: November 6, 2007

[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
NS Email Address for Mailing Database
Updated: November 6, 2007

[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
NS Email Address for Mailing Database
Updated: November 6, 2007

[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
sbollinger@@youradvocate.org [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
NS Email Address for Mailing Database
Updated: November 6, 2007

[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007

First Name Last Name Organization Address #1 Add. #2 City State Zip Phone e-mail
Tenet / Saint Louis
University Hospital West
H.C. Abbott Pavillion 3655 Vista Ave. Suite 100 St. Louis MO 63110 577-8019 [email protected]
Missouri Botanical
Glenda Abney Gardens 3617 Grandel Square St. Louis MO 63108 577-0288
Pat Acquisto 6373 Smiley St. Louis MO 63139 781-2129 [email protected]
Marilyn Adaire Porfidio Group LLC 2730 N. Ballas Suite 100 St. Louis MO 63131 239-9191 [email protected]

Joe Adams & Marta Tilney 1848 S. 10th St. St. Louis MO 63104 241-8387 [email protected]
Nancy Adams 2006 S. 11th St. St. Louis MO 63104 776-3298 [email protected]
314-757-
Ishmael Ahmad 3965 Woodcrest Dr. St. Louis MO 63033 5823 [email protected]
Malik and
Deborah Ahmed 724 North Union Suite 301 St. Louis MO 63108
Saced Ahmed 2669 Hickory St. St. Louis MO 63104
Andrew Alaska 2041 Alle Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 773-7257
Andrew Alaska 2041 Allen Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 773-7257

Jeff Albert 393 N. Euclid #300 St. Louis Mo 63108 361-7117 [email protected]
Mary Albert 2858 Missouri Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 772-0263 [email protected]
Bonne
Bob Albrecht 1522 Rue Riviera Terre MO 63628
636-296-
Jeanette Alexander 2279 Cessna Dr. Arnold MO 63010 4055 [email protected]
Uma Alickovic Bolero Café 4718 Gravois Ave. St. Louis MO 63116 353-3620
David Allen 4437 Elembank St. Louis MO 63115 [email protected]
Michael Allen 1312 Sullivan St. Louis MO 63107 421-6474 [email protected]
314-389-
Wilbert Allen 4421 Marcus Ave St. Louis MO 63115 9683
Vern Allmeroth 5606 Arendes St. Louis MO 63116 752-9844 [email protected]
Value STL Associates,
Linda Alsup LP 300 N. 4 St. Louis MO 63102 241-9700 [email protected]
Ann Althoff 211 N. Broadway St. Louis MO 63102 754-4388 [email protected]
314-616-
Toni Amadon 2206 Edwards St. Louis MO 63110 9197 [email protected]
Linda Ameis 8316 Vasel St. Louis MO 63123
Sue Ames & Dave Wolfe 2414 S. 13th St. St. Louis MO 63104 772-6980 [email protected]
Marian Amies 1960 Arsenal st. St. Louis MO 63118 771-9880 [email protected]

Federation of Block
Carol Anderson Units Board of Directors 5029 lotus 63113 St. Louis MO 63113 361-2725
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Jeff Anderson 1852 S. 10th St. Louis MO 63104 231-0537 [email protected]
South Grand
Community 3203A South Grand
Susan Anderson Improvement District Blvd. Suite c St. Louis MO 63118 772-5750 [email protected]
314-845-
Martin Andre Jr. 4941 Tangueray Ln. Apt. E St. Louis MO 63129 9020 [email protected]

Martin Andre, Jr. 4545 Minnesota Ave St. Louis MO 63111 [email protected]
Bob Andrews 6456 Arsenal St. Louis MO 63139
David Androff 515 Clark Ave. St. Louis MO 63119
Robert Arbuthnot 4217 Prairie St. Louis MO 63107 531-3237
314-355-
Jan Arbutti c/o Southern Floral 7400 Michigan St. Louis MO 63111 7400
Rosa Arenoy 3961 Shaw Blvd St. Louis MO 63110
Leef Armontrout 2216 S. 9th St. Louis MO 63104 651-9384
Joann Arpiani 5505 Sugar Ave. St. Louis MO 63110
3726 Loughborough 314-752-
Mary Asaro Ave. St. Louis MO 63116 9772 masaro_53 @msn.com
John & 314-752-
Marge Asbury 5705 Holly Hills Ave. St. Louis MO 63109 3290 [email protected]
Eyosu Asfaw PO Box 4744 St. Louis MO 63108
Matt Ashby & Dennis Hamon 1011 Geyer Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 588-1407 [email protected]
Matthew Ashby 1011 Geyer Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 444-8891 [email protected]
HOPE VI Community &
Supportive Services,
U.S. Dept. of Housing & Washingto
Ron Ashford Urban Development 451 7th Street, N.W. Room 4128 n, D.C. 20410
Larry Atherton 3530 Tenn. St. Louis MO 63118 773-8303
Jarad and 11795 Old Halls Ferry
Seteria Austin rd. Florissant MO 63033 831-5452
Mindy Austin 912 Emmet St. St. Louis MO 63104 421-0260
David Ayres 3185 S. Grand Apt. 205 St. Louis MO 63118

St. Louis Public Schools'

Peter Bailey Facilities and Planning 3416 Cook Avenue St. Louis MO 63106 345-2348
Terry Bainbridge 2348 S. 11th Street St. Louis MO 63104 773-1215
314-544-
Erika Baker 7612 Alabama Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 1811
Erika Baker 7612 Alabama Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 544-1811
314-531-
Ruth Baker 3230 Bailey St. Louis MO 63107 3467
1001 Highlands Plaza 314-621-
Gary Balke Balke Brown Dr. West. Suite 150 St. Louis MO 63110 1414
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Mary Balmer 2011 Edwards St. Louis MO 63110
William &
Doris Baltimore 3113 Norwood Ave. St. Louis MO 63115 382-3311 [email protected]
Eric Banhi 2755 Russell St. Louis MO 63104 [email protected]
128-B Seven Trails 636-230-
Therese Baquiram Dr. Ballwin MO 63011 6067
Teresa Barbaglia 5327 Botanical St. Louis MO 63110
Alderwoma St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
n Donna Baringer Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
Kathy Barkey 2717 S. 11th St. St. Louis MO 63118 776-8045 [email protected]
Kathy Barkley 2717 S. 11th St. St. Louis MO 63118 776-8045
Senator Christopher S. [email protected].
Charles Barnes Bond 7700 Bonhomme Suite 615 Clayton MO 63105 725-4484 gov
314-535-
Mark Barnett 4308 Chouteau Ave. St. Louis MO 63110 2071 [email protected]
Senator Jim Talent's Three City Place [email protected].
Peggy Barnhart Office Drive Suite 1020 St. Louis MO 63141 432-5211 gov
McCormack Baron 314-621-
Richard Baron Salazar 1415 Olive St. Suite 310 St. Louis MO 63103 3400
772-8170 or
Fox Park Neighborhood cell: 314-518-
Chris Barton Assoc. 2735 Russell St. Louis MO 63104 4903 [email protected]
Linda Batek 2247 Jules St. Louis MO 63104 773-1817 [email protected]
McGuire Moving & 1333 North Sixth
Patrick Batson Storage Street St. Louis MO 63106 241-0600
Baumgartne 3134 South Grand ryan.baumgartner@commerce
Ryan r Commerce Bank Blvd. St. Louis MO 63118 746-8230 bank.com
Alexander Beard 4875 Lexington St. Louis MO 63115 385-0698
Annie Beck 1544 McLaran St. Louis MO 63147 389-9297

Brett Beckemeyer 507 N. 13th St. Louis MO 63103 229-2166 [email protected]

314-560-
Aaron Becker 9725 Grantview Dr. St. Louis MO 63123 1806 [email protected]
Joe &
Michelle Becker 2404 S. 11th St. St. Louis MO 63104 773-0680 [email protected]
Roy Becker 920 Allen Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 503-0383 [email protected]

Jane Beckerdite 7705 Murdoch Ave. St. Louis MO 63119 776-6691 [email protected]
314-894-
John Been 453 Fairwick Dr St. Louis MO 63129 8775 [email protected]
Jane Beetem Missouri Department of P.O. Box 176 Jefferson MO 65102 573-522-
Natural Resources City 2401
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007

231-6806 or [email protected]
Stephanie Beks Bank of America CDC 800 Market Street St. Louis MO 63101 466-9158 m
Laura Belarbi 5712 Pennsylvania St. Louis MO 63111 351-6712

Federation of Block 314-382-

Carrie Bell Units Board of Directors 4621 Kossuth 63115 St. Louis MO 63115 4835
Charlene Bell 2512 N. Market St. St. Louis MO 63106 436-2855

Gary Bell 2348 Tennessee Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 865-1995 [email protected]

Jill Belsky Rodemyer - Cristel, Inc. 3630 Grandel Square St. Louis MO 63108 454-0800 [email protected]
Kathy Benazzle 1520 Hebert St. Louis MO 63107 231-3148
Dutchtown North 776-
Neighborhood 2116/622-
Sandy Bender Association 3405 Keokuk St. Louis MO 63118 4610 [email protected]

Herbert Benham 1200 Allen Market ln Apt 209 St. Louis MO 63104 621-9249
Beth Bennett 2624 S 12th St St. Louis MO 63118 772-2517 [email protected]
Harry Bennett SLDC Field Office 7419 S. Broadway St. Louis MO 63111 832-2946

James Bennett 324 Helfenstein Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 962-5217 [email protected]
Olive Roy Bennett 4061 Fillmore St. Louis MO 63116
Walter Berberich 6424 Lavernell Ct. St. Louis MO 63116 832-4916
Kathryn Berger 904 Russell Blvd. Apt A St. Louis MO 63104
Checkerboard
Kasey Bergh Square 2T St. Louis MO 63164 982-3951 [email protected]

Donald Bergmann 4046 Botanical Ave. St. Louis MO 63110 776-4050

Sine Berhanu 7025 Amherst St. Louis MO 63130
Bernard- 314-535-
Shantae Winston 2908 Palm Place St. Louis MO 63107 0499
JH Berra Land 5091 New 314-487-
John Berra, Jr. Development Baumgartner Rd. St. Louis MO 63129 6717
Diane Berry 1225 Warren St. St. Louis MO 63106 621-6507 [email protected]
Tyler Berry 1912 Provenchere St. Louis MO 63104 702-0515
Yeshalem Berza 3620 Dunica, 1st Flr St. Louis MO 63116
Department of Parks,
Gary Bess Recreation & Forestry 5600 Clayton Avenue St. Louis MO 63110 289-5310 [email protected]

Bevo 2001 Community

Improvement
Jennifer Bess Corporation 4705 Ridgewood St. Louis MO 63116 352-0141 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Betts- 314-741-
Mary Douglas 12643 Willow Trail Dr. St. Louis MO 63303 5136
63106-
Bill Bialczak S & H Parking System 1325 N 10th St St. Louis MO 4550 621-1600
Kim Biedscheid 4266 Swan St. Louis MO 63110 534-7317 [email protected]
Bette Bierman 3825 Kosciusko St. St. Louis MO 63118
Don Bierman 3825 Kosciusko St. Louis MO 63118 865-3550
St. Margaret Housing
Viki Bierman Corporation 4067 Shenandoah St. Louis MO 63110 771-4170
Steve Billings Missouri Department of 105 W. Capital P. O. Box Jefferson MO 65102
Transportation 270 City
5342 N. 314-383-
Preston Billingstay Kingshighway St. Louis MO 63115 0632
Talizar Bins 4540 Arco Ave St. Louis Mo 63110 533-4775 [email protected]
Mike Birk 4333 Beethoven St. Louis MO 63116 832-8839

Shirley Birkenmeier 4419 Oscola St. St. Louis MO 63116 353-4759

David &
Lois Birner 2211 S. 10th St. St. Louis MO 63104 773-8229 [email protected]

Eva Bischoff 4227 Cleveland Ave. St. Louis MO 63110 664-5918

Joe Bishop 3214 Indiana St. Louis MO 63118 776-6884
314-721-
Bernie Blackmon 916 Jeanertte Dr. St. Louis MO 63130 1064 [email protected]

East-West Gateway
Jerry Blair Council of Government One Memorial Drive Suite 1600 St. Louis MO 63102 421-4220 [email protected]
Blanton-
Wendy Kuhl 4168 Shaw Blvd St. Louis MO 63110 664-1466
Dan Bledsoe 1048 B. Geyer Ave St. Louis MO 63104
Sarah Bliss 3818 S. Broadway St. Louis MO 63118
Meva Blubaugh 2821 Lemp St. Louis MO 63118 771-4095
Forest Park Southeast
Development
Irving Blue Corporation 4471 Arco St. Louis MO 63110 533-6704 [email protected]
2120 E. Adelaide
Tracy Blue Ave. St. Louis MO 63107 495-6841 [email protected]
Kelly Bock 2118 S. 13th St St. Louis MO 63104 776-0409 [email protected]

Brian Boeckmann 5331 Delor S. Louis MO 63109 [email protected]

Kevin Boker 1719 S. 8th St. St. Louis MO 63104 484-6005 [email protected]
314-973-
Debra Boler 4253 Westminister Pl St. Louis MO 63108 2102 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Joe Bolger 1845 S. 9th St. St. Louis MO 63104 531-1881 [email protected]
Kenneth Schmitt Law 105 Concord Plaza
Sara Bollinger Office Shopping Ctr St. Louis MO 63128 729-1049 sbollinger@@youradvocate.org
Tom Bolman 2113 Menard St. St. Louis MO 63104 772-0708 [email protected]
314-922-
Tim Bolt 6220 Arendes St. Louis MO 63116 6220 [email protected]

Federation of Block 3007 James Cool

Michelle Bolton Units Board of Directors Papa Bell 63106 St. Louis MO 63106 531-7617
Teresal Bommarito 7 McKnight Ln St. Louis MO 63124
Sheryl Bonsett 2038 Geyer Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 260-9221 [email protected]
Betty Borisch 3746 Wisconsin St. Louis MO 63118 773-6118
Alderman
Freeman St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
M. Bosley, Sr. Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
1431 N. Kingsland 333-4490
Amie Bossi Connections to Success Ave. St. Louis MO 63133 x110 [email protected]
[email protected]
Eric Bothe 3503 Louisiana Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 762-0296 m
Maro Bottani 2863 S. 18th St. St. Louis MO 63104 323-3584 [email protected]
314-725-
Bill Boudoures William Boudoures Co. 8029 Clayton Road St. Louis MO 63117 1997
Kristan Bowles 703 N. 13th St. #401 St. Louis MO 63103 [email protected]
Dorothy Boxdorfer 4431 Taft St. Louis MO 63116
Alderman St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
Jeffrey Boyd Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
314-776-
Bill Boyd 2645 Wyoming St. Louis MO 63118 4441 [email protected]

Kenneth Boyd 3780 West Florissant St. Louis MO 63107

314-382-
6567 314-
741-9101 x-
Federation of Block 5642 Pamplin Pl. 29 Cell: 229-
Pamela Boyd Units Board of Directors 63136 St. Louis MO 63136 6567 [email protected]
314-385-
Stephanie Boykin 5269 1/2 Robin St. St. Louis MO 63120 9687 [email protected]

201 West
Capitol
Honorable MO House of Avenue, Jefferson 573-751-
Amber Boykins D-60 Representatives Room 115A City MO 65101 4415 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Tower Grove Heights 3203 S. Grand Blvd.
Daryl Brach Neighborhood Assoc. Suite 103 St. Louis MO 63118 776-7710 [email protected]
Dana Brackeen & Doug Firley 2341 S. 12th St. Louis MO 63104 249-9977 [email protected]
Kathleen Brackeen 2814 Louisiana St. Louis MO 63118 494-0551 [email protected]
314-977-
Kathleen Brady St. Louis University 221 North Grand Blvd Room 211 St. Louis MO 63103 8173 [email protected]
Mary Brake 3915 A Flad St. Louis MO 63110 776-5311
Advantage Funeral 314-638-
Ray Brand Home 7814 S. Broadway St. Louis MO 63111 0111
Todd Brandt 2117 Arsenal St. Louis MO 63118 409-1437 [email protected]

Panattoni Development 314-783-

Mark Branstetter Company 8112 Maryland Ave. Suite 205 St. Louis MO 63105 0023
Gloria Brathornli 1211 Hebert St. Louis MO 63107 421-6038
Gloria Bratkowski 1211 Herbert St. St. Louis MO 61307 421-6038 [email protected]
Eddie Brauer 3420 Missouri Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 558-4083 [email protected]
Honorable
Joan Bray D-24 8420 Delmar Blvd. Suite LL4
St. Louis MO 63124 340-6582 [email protected]
Honorable Jefferson 573-751-
Joan Bray D-24 State Capitol Building Room 434 City MO 65101 2514
Renaissance Grand 314-621-
Robert Bray Hotel 800 Washington Ave St. Louis MO 63101 9600
Almnesh Breka 525 Paddlewheel Florissant MO 63033
Eric Brende 2037 Allen St. Louis MO 63104 773-6227
Eric Brende 2037 Allen Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 773-6227
Ron Brendel 9151 Newby St. Louis MO 63137 869-2432
1021 Washington 314-793- [email protected]
Alicia Brewer Ave. St. Louis MO 63101 2660 x
Mike Brewer 1846 S. 9th St. St. Louis MO 63104 369-7452 [email protected]
Nancy Bridges 2627 Virginia St. Louis MO 63118 577-6386
314-457-
Delmar Brimble 6448 Vermont Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 9289 [email protected]
Missouri Botanical
Paul Brockmann Garden P.O. Box 299 St. Louis MO 63166 577-5129 [email protected]
Paul Brockmann 4344 Shaw St. Louis MO 63110 577-5129 [email protected]
314-577-
Paul Brockmann 4344 Shaw Blvd. St. Louis MO 63110 5129 [email protected]
D.E. Breckenridge
Lynette Broeg Companies 400 South 14th Street St. Louis MO 63103 231-5007
Adrian Brown 3807 Botanical Ave St. Louis MO 63110
Alicia Brown 8072 Benette St. Louis MO 63117 644-4915
501 Clara Ave. Apt.
Barbara Brown 204 St. Louis MO 63112 535-1425
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Candice Brown 1321 Glasgow Ave. St. Louis MO 63106 256-3095
Carrie Brown 4601 Greer Apt A St. Louis MO 63115 389-1461
314-389-
Carrie Brown 4601 Greer Ave St. Louis MO 63115 1461
Ella Brown 2400 McNair St. Louis MO 63104 773-6766
Gail Brown 4709 Delmar St. Louis MO 63108 367-4709 [email protected]
314-771-
Harold Brown PO Box 4552 St. Louis MO 63108 2091 [email protected]
Larry Brown 4422 Beethoven St. Louis MO 63116 [email protected]
Marilyn Brown 4008 Darby St. St. Louis MO 63120 381-8413 [email protected]
Matthew Brown 5052 A Potomac St. St. Louis MO 63139 [email protected]
Michael Brown 3446 Pestalozzi St. Louis MO 63118 776-1917 [email protected]
314-771-
Roy Brown 2117 Ann Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 1722 [email protected]
Shawn Brusatti 5350 Bischoff Ave. St. Louis MO 63110 776-5606 [email protected]

Federation of Block 7863 Milan Ave 314-721-

Loretta Bryant Units Board of Directors Univercity City 63130 St. Louis MO 63136 3178
Ruth Bryant 4200 Connecticut St. Louis MO 63116 776-6955
Charles Bryson Office of the Mayor City Hall Room 200 St. Louis MO 63103 622-4043 [email protected]
1200 Market St. City
Charles Bryson Hall Rm. 401 St. Louis MO 63103 622-3391
Jorge Bucio 4422 Neosho St. St. Louis MO 63116

Carondelet Community
Marie- Betterment Federation 6408 Michigan 752-6339
Charles Buford (CCBF) Avenue St. Louis MO 63111 /481-8800
314-540-
Annie Bullerdieck 3660 Wilmington Ave. St. Louis MO 63116 4495 [email protected]
Emily Burch 2200 S. 12th St. St. Louis MO 63104 616-5664 [email protected]
Betty Burma 4253 Miami St. Louis MO 63116 773-6307
314-773-
Betty Burns 4253 Miami St. Louis MO 63116 6307
Sonny Burnside 1846 S. 9th St. St. Louis MO 63104 588-1619 [email protected]
Old North St. Louis
John Burse Restoration Group 1408 Herbert St. Louis MO 63107 421-1815 [email protected]
John Burse 1408 Hebert St. Louis MO 63107
Barry &
Mary Burton 911 Lami St. St. Louis MO 63104 865-2849 [email protected]
Richard Burton MadCo Printing 1715 S. 11th St. St. Louis MO 63104 [email protected]
E. Bush 4306 Melba St. Louis MO 63101 495-7202
Sarah Buss 3818 S. Broadway St. Louis MO 63118
Jennifer Byers 5216 Bischoff Ave. St. Louis MO 63110 577-0543 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Bill Byrd 2645 Wyoming St. St. Louis MO 63118 [email protected]
Patrick Cacchione 3419 Hawthorne St. Louis MO 63104 664-8256 [email protected]
Roshelle Caldwell 5125 Ashland St. Louis MO 63115 382-4755
314-381-
Lawson Calhoun 3033 N. Euclid Ave. St. Louis MO 63115 3100 x101 [email protected]
Andrew Callahan 2240 Oregon St. Louis MO 63104
Linda Callahan 3939 Dover Place St. Louis MO 63116 481-4885 [email protected]
Flora Calley 4971 Lilburn St. Louis MO 63115 383-4509

800 Market
Street, 15th
Mary Campbell Bank of America MO1-800-15-03 Floor St. Louis MO 63101 466-6991
41 South Central Clayto
John Campisi County Councilman Avenue n MO 63105 (314)615-5442
Annie Canada 3812 Ashland Place St. Louis MO 63107 533-6942
JoAnn Cannon City Hall Room 418 St. Louis MO 613-7165
Marie Capelli 2220 Oregon St. Louis MO 63104
Mattie Carpenter 4744 Plover Ave. St. Louis MO 63120 389-4192
Raul Carranco 6412 Pennsylvania St. Louis MO 63111
Debbi Carroll 3129 Lemp Ave St. Louis MO 63118 664-4009

1232 Washington 504-0050 or

John Carroll Carhill Enterprises, Inc. Ave. Suite 300 St. Louis MO 63103 621-7647 [email protected]
Shirley Carroll 2846 California St. Louis MO 63118 773-2272 [email protected]
Alderman St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
Greg Carter Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
320 E. Ripa St.
Gen Cassani SSND MCU Isaiah Ave. Louis MO 63125 314-633-7009

Randall Cates 6719 Bradley St. Louis MO 63139 314-64-4182

Deanna Cecil 3729 Wisconsin St. Louis MO 63118 865-4234
Deanna Cecil 3729 Wisconsin St. Louis MO 63118 865-4234
Ron Cecil 3729 Wisconsin St. Louis MO 63118
Ronald Cecil 3729 Wisconsin St. Louis MO 63118
Citizens for Modern
Kimberly Cella Transit 911 Washington Ave. Suite 200 St. Louis MO 63101 231-7272 [email protected]
Amy Cervantes 6154 Leona St. St. Louis MO 63116 352-5734
1709 Washington
Eileen Cervantes King Bee Bldg LLC Ave. St. Louis MO 63103 750-0055
Barbara Chandler Gate District 3148 Hickory St. Louis MO 63104 577-6363 [email protected]
Goleather Chandler Gate District 3148 Hickory St. Louis MO 63104 773-8491
TRISTAR Business 390 S. Woods Mill Town & 314-291-
Larry Chapman Communities Rd., Suite 160 Country MO 63107 9999
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Adam Charnack 3868 A Arsenal St. Louis MO 63116 776-2883 [email protected]
314-520-
Adam Charnack 3868 Arsenal St. Louis MO 63116 5664 [email protected]
Kathy Cherer 4515 Tholozan St. Louis MO 63116 865-0795
Robert Cherhoniak 1901 Ann Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 776-4205
2525 South Big Bend pccherryproperties@sbcglobal.
Pam Cherry Cherry Properties Blvd. St. Louis MO 63143 645-7900 net
Nick Chevamce U.S. National Park 601 Riverfront drive Omaha Nebra 68102 402-661-
Service ska 1736
Sarah Christman The Little School 2116 S. 13th St. St. Louis MO 63104
314-436-
JoAnn Church 14 N. 19th St. St. Louis MO 63106 1695
1401 South 314-968-
Joe Ciapciak Pace Properties Brentwood Suite 100 St. Louis MO 63144 9898
Joe Civettini 4112 Flora Place St. Louis MO 63110 664-8993
James Clark 6347 Plymouth Wellston MO 63133
Jason &
Lisa Clark 1116 Sidney St. St. Louis MO 63104 691-6151 [email protected]
Joey Clark 3016 Salena St. Louis MO 63118 773-6152
314-531-
June Clark 4063 Westminister Pl St. Louis MO 63108 9497
Louise Clark 3926 Greer St. St. Louis MO 63107 531-1619

Union Seventy 5391

Michael Clark Clark Properties Center Brown Ave. St. Louis MO 63120 389-8822 [email protected]
Ron Clark 4068 Flad St. Louis MO 63110 477-5608 [email protected]
Ron Claus 1612 Lucas #310 St. Louis MO 63103
HOPE VI Community &
Supportive Services,
U.S. Dept. of Housing & Washingto
Len Clay Urban Development 451
53547th Street,
Martin N.W.
Luther Room 4128 n, D.C. 20410 314-361-
Shirley Clay King St. Louis MO 63112 4983
314-577-
Sheila Clayton 4651 Shaw Suite 142 St. Louis MO 63110 0896 [email protected]
The Ambassador East 1301 North State eclements@theambassadoreas
Eric Clements Hotel Parkway Chicago IL 60610 thotel.com

Federation of Block 2805 Maurer Velda

Vicki Clincy Units Board of Directors City, 63121 St. Louis MO 63121 385-8593
Downtown St. Louis 314-231-
Jim Cloar Partnership 906 Olive Suite 200 St. Louis MO 63101 7272 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007

738 Lemay St.

William J. Cocos Vice President William g. Cocos Ferry Road Louis MO 63125 (314)631-2688
Affordable Commnts. of
Jerry Cohen MO. 415 N. Tucker Blvd. St. Louis MO 63101 436-7777 [email protected]
314-477-
Ioana Cojocaru 3822 fillmore st. St. Louis MO 63116 6517 [email protected]
Neil Coker 2707 Ann St. Louis MO 63104
Andy Cole 1531 S. 8th St. Apt. 304 St. Louis MO 63104 814-4337
Denice Cole 1133 Aubert Ave. St. Louis MO 63113 367-0270 [email protected]
Spring & Delor Park
Community/Business
Kim Cole Group 4745 Spring St. Louis MO 63116 865-5520
Henrietta Coleman 4656 Korte St. Louis MO 63115 383-5266
Honorable
Maida Coleman D-5 P.O. Box 771425 St. Louis MO 63177
Honorable Jefferson 573-571-
Maida Coleman D-5 State Capitol Building Room 220 City MO 65101 2606
Coleman- 1420 North Park
Zerieta Chapman Place St. Louis MO 63107 421-1325
1445-47 North 9th
Melda Collins Street St. Louis MO 63106
636-530- [email protected]
Mike Collins Tyco Mallinckrodt 675 McDonnell Blvd St. Louis MO 63042 9487 m

Commercial 314-835-
Steve Collins Development Company 1650 Des Peres Rd. Suite 303 St. Louis MO 63131 1515
Rick Compton 1829 Lami St. St. Louis MO 63104 771-1542
Beth Conray 2816 Accomac St. Louis MO 63104
Mahmoud Conteh 3647 Liermann Ave St. Louis MO 63116
Alderman St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
Stephen Conway Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
314-865-
Phong Cooc 3818 Chippewa St. Louis MO 63116 0781
4249 Michigan Ave, 314-832-
Mangolia Cooper Apt #901 St. Louis MO 63111 7291
Barak Corbett 6347 Plymouth Wellston MO 63133
Dan Corbin 4185 Manchester St. Louis MO 63110 531-8116
Daniel Corbin 4185 Manchester St. Louis MO 63110 531-8116
Monica Costello 2310 S. 13th St. St. Louis MO 63104 776-2867 [email protected]
Joe Cothern US Environmental Mailcode WWPD 901 N. 5th Kansas KS 66101 913-551-
Protection Agency St. City 7148
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007

Gwendolyn Cotton 902 Iron St. Louis MO 63111

618-235-
Richard Coughlin 205 Bellevue Belleville IL 62226 3627 [email protected]
Juanita Counts 3623 Iowa Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 773-3271
Ann Couper 1525 Sells St. Louis MO 63147 385-3321
Rozya Cour 4627 Ridgewood St. Louis MO 63116
4650 Aspen Hollow
William Courtney Dr. St. Louis MO 63128 845-0588 [email protected]
George Cousins Hub Furniture 1901 S. Broadway St. Louis MO 63104 231-2100 [email protected]
PO Box
One Ameren Plaza, 66149, MC
Otis Cowan Ameren 1901 Chouteau Ave. 100 St. Louis MO 63166 554-4740 [email protected]
Chippewa
Neighborhood
Almus Cox Association (CAN) 2831 Chippewa St. Louis MO 63118 865-2466
Brenda Cox 2348 S. 11th Street St. Louis MO 63104 960-6040
Mt.
Karen Cox 1707 14th St. Vernon IL 62864 [email protected]
314-308-
Liz Cox 3629 A. South Spring St. Louis MO 63116 8102 [email protected]
Robert Cox 2407 S. 13th St. St. Louis MO 63104 721-9292 [email protected]
Nashville Craig 4225 Chouteau St. Louis MO 63110 330-9696 [email protected]
Lemay Housing PO Box
Justine Craig-Meyer Partnership 16356 Lemay MO 63125 314-631-9905
Lance Crain 2013 Chippewa St. Louis MO 63118 664-6579
Lou Crawle 1831 Tenguson St. Louis MO 63133
Mary Crayton 4916 Page St. Louis MO 63113 361-8996
Rev.
Richard Creason 3519 N. 14th Street St. Louis MO 63107
Nancy Crew 2215 Montana St. Louis MO 63118
Nancy Crew 2215 Montana St. Louis MO 63118 752-2092
St. Louis Development
Rodney Crim Corporation 1015 Locust Street Suite 1200 St. Louis MO 63101 259-3441
Michael Crooks 2831 Shenandoah St. Louis MO 63104
Elisa Crouch 900 N. Tucker St. Louis MO 63101 340-8119 [email protected]
Mary Cullins 4147 Oleatha St. Louis MO 63116 446-6471 [email protected]
Carla Cunigan 5307 Pennsylvania S. Louis MO 63111 832-3533 [email protected]
Clara Cunigan 6126 Colorado Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 351-7650
314-457-
Deboroh Cunigan 6117 Idaho Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 0592 [email protected]
Jerry Cunigan 5307 Pennsylvania St. Louis MO 63111 832-3533
Rossevelt Cunigan 6126 Colorado Ave. S. Louis MO 63111 351-7650
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007

SSM Cardinal Glennon

Richard Cunningham Children's Hospital 1465 S. Grand Blvd. St. Louis MO 63104 268-4117
Jamison Memorial
Human Resource & 609 North Leffingwell
Lillian Curlett Development Agency Ave. St. Louis MO 63103 531-9691 [email protected]
St. Louis County 41 South Central
Tom Curran Planning Avenue St. Louis MO 63105 615-2541 [email protected]
41 South
St. Louis County Central St.
Tom Curran Executive Office Avenue Louis MO 63105 314-615-2591
314-962-
Ted Curtis 349 Oakwood Ave St. Louis MO 63119 0853 [email protected]
Kathy Czarnecki 4130 Cleveland St. Louis MO 63110 773-0268
314-497-
Jim Dahlem 6915 Leona St. St. Louis MO 63116 8675 [email protected]
Tom &
Merry Dahms 1525 Missouri St. Louis MO 63104 773-6436
Spanish Lake
Development
Jim Dalton Corporation 32 Hickory Hill Drive O'Fallon MO 63366 [email protected]
Jon Dalton 500 N. Broadway Ste. 2000 St. Louis Mo 63110 444-7769 [email protected]
John &
Kristan Dames 2519 S. 12th St. St. Louis MO 63104 776-4899 [email protected]
Don Dang 3715 Gustine St. Louis MO 63116
314-776-
Vinh Dang 4159 Fairview Ave. St. Louis MO 63116 1599
marc.dangerfield@ewgateway.
Marc Dangerfield One Memorial Dr. St. Louis MO 63108 421-4220 org

Rob Daren 2348 Tennessee Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 865-1995 [email protected]
Joel Dauve 1840 S. 10th St. St. Louis MO 63104 322-9210

SSM Cardinal Glennon

Bob Davidson Children's Hospital 1465 S. Grand Blvd. St. Louis MO 63104 577-5345 [email protected]
Annie Davis 4545 Lexington St. Louis MO 63115 385-9679
Carlene Davis 4948 Maffitt St. Louis MO 63113 361-1302
Danite Davis 1821 Kennett Place St. Louis MO 63104
Garlanda Davis 4174 Botanical St. Louis MO 63110 772-1208

Grand Tower Grove c/o Tower Grove 2710 South

Joe Davis Betterment Association Manor Grand St. Louis MO 63118 664-6660 [email protected]
Joe Davis 3217 Dakota St. St. Louis MO 63111 351-3616 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Lovey Davis 6143 Garesche St. Louis MO 63136 382-7704
Mary Davis 5935 Thekla Ave. St. Louis MO 63136 385-8396 [email protected]
Myrtle Davis 1825 S. Newstead St. Louis MO 63110
Nancy Davis 2350 S. 11th St. St. Louis MO 63104 776-4841 [email protected]
Patricia Davis 3821 A. Sullivan St. Louis MO 63107 533-2566
Sarah Davis The HRI Group, Inc. 1007 Olive Street 3rd Floor St. Louis MO 63101 436-6800 [email protected]
314-489-
Avery Day 4148 Russell St. Louis MO 63110 8979

East-West Gateway
Donna Day Council of Government One Memorial Drive Suite 1600 St. Louis MO 63102 421-4220 [email protected]
Pearley Day 4231 DeSoto St. Louis MO 63107 533-0711
Pearly Day 4231 DeSoto St. Louis MO 63107 533-0053
South Broadway 6721 South
Jaymes Dearing Merchants' Association Broadway St. Louis MO 63111 351-4099 [email protected]
314-481-
Sam Dednam 6405 Virginia Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 2284
Jason Deem 2623 Cherokee St. Louis MO 63118 [email protected]
Joe Degreeff 9338 Fredric Ct. St. Louis MO 63144 479-2129 [email protected]
Joseph DeGregorio 5629 Bischoff St. Louis MO 63110
588-7111
Keith Deisner 1025 Park Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 x206 [email protected]
Roger &
Christie DeJean 2866 Wisconsin St. Louis MO 63118
Marge DelCarlo 3126 Portis Ave. St. Louis MO 63116 771-3402
4414 Morganford
Haris Delic Sana Inc. Road St. Louis MO 63116 481-5356
314-865-
Lyn Demoss 1301 Mackay Place St. Louis MO 63104 5388 [email protected]
James Dennis 2012 Allen St. Louis MO 63104 378-0007
Bobby Denwood 4422 Carter Ave St. Louis MO 63115 381-6793
bderousse@mcgrathconstructi
Bret DeRousse 5440 Daggett Ave. St. Louis MO 63110 on.com
Anne DeSchryver 1225 Lami St. St. Louis MO 63104 495-7454 [email protected]
15932 Woodlet Way Chesterfiel 636-532-
Anthony Devoti Ct. d MO 63017 5225 [email protected]
(314) 345-
Bill DeWitt III Ballpark Village 323 S. Broadway St. Louis MO 63102 9600
Rebecca Diekemper 4424 Gibson Ave. St. Louis MO 63110 531-9325 [email protected]
Robert Dielmann 3841 S. Broadway St. Louis MO 63118 776-5472

Dannette Dietz Pyramid Contruction Co. 906 Olive St. St. Louis MO 63101 621-1100
Audrey Dillon 4541 Anderson St. Louis MO 63115 385-9236
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007

Jay & Julie Dinkelmann 812 Ann Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 776-0734 [email protected]
314-647-
Paul DiRaimondo 2101 Sublette St. Louis MO 63110 3831
Vincent &
Virginia DiRaimondo 2230 Stephen St. Louis MO 63110 781-2432
Muhamed Dizdarevic Dragulj Bosne LLC 4600 Delor St. St. Louis MO 63116 583-2896 [email protected]
St. Louis County 121 S. Meramec, 314-615-
Jim Dobson Economic Council Suite 900 Clayton MO 63105 7624 [email protected]
617-830- sy-Dobson1411@pop-
Jim Dobson 198 Tremont St. #506 Boston MA 2116 0852 hosting.com
Karen and
John Doggette 2854 Indiana Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 802-8938
Libby Dominik 2316 S. 9th St. St. Louis MO 63104 575-7494 [email protected]
Tony Dominquez 4430 Beethoven St. Louis MO 63116
41 South Central Clayto
Charlie Dooley County Executor Avenue n MO 63105 (314)615-7016
Debbie Dornfeld 1844 Russell Blvd. St. Louis MO 63104 239-6328
Donna Dorsey 3453 Oregon St. Louis MO 63118 773-3313 [email protected]
314-580-
Becca doss 4046 Winnebago St. Louis MO 63116 2704 [email protected]
2926 Samuel
Willie Mae Dotson Shepard B St. Louis MO 63103 533-4339
Cliff Doucet & Lisa Otke 1214 Victor St. St. Louis MO 63104 664-4242 [email protected]
Honorable
Pat Dougherty D-4 4031 Parker Avenue St. Louis MO 63116 772-1948
Honorable Jefferson 573-751-
Pat Dougherty D-4 State Capitol Building Room 333 City MO 65101 3599 [email protected]
Frederick Douglas 2452 Fair Acres Rd St. Louis MO 63136 741-3189 [email protected]
Tracey Douglas 2915 Miami St. Louis MO 63118 773-1720
Valerie Dowdy 5914 Clemens St. Louis MO 63112 863-7452 [email protected]
Gregg Doyle 2220 Oregon St. Louis MO 63104
Brenda Drake 5348 Wabada St. Louis MO 63112 383-7252
212-588-
Amy Druckemiller Related Capital 625 Madison Ave. New York NY 10022 2100
Doug Duckworth 5818 Mardel Ave. Apt. A St. Louis MO 63109 566-3465 [email protected]
Jean Duda 3845 Federer Pl St. Louis MO 63116
Tom Duda 3845 Federer Pl St. Louis MO 63116 [email protected]
Tom Duerbusch 2306 S. 12th St. St. Louis MO 63104 776-5523 [email protected]
Mike Duff 3440 Virginia Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 226-9345 [email protected]
Evelyn Duffin 4111 Michigan St. Louis MO 63118 749-7038
Benjamin DuMont 4970 Oakland Ave. St. Louis MO 63110 531-0330 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
314-727-
Roger Duncan 6170 McPherson St. Louis MO 63112 2309
Rick Dungey 1015 Allen Ave. Apt B. St. Louis MO 63104 449-5050 [email protected]
Ella Mae Dunlap 4216 Linton St. Louis MO 63107 371-7198
Ellamae Dunlap 4216 Linton St. Louis MO 63107
314-341-
Barbara Dunn 3503 Lincoln St. Louis MO 63121 3277 [email protected]
314-388-
Arlene Dunnavant 1540 Veronica St. Louis MO 63147 2428

Joyce Dunn-James Kingdom House 1321 South 11th St. St. Louis MO 63104 421-0400 [email protected]
Daniel Dunsford 3236 Gustine St. Louis MO 63116 776-1767
314-261-
Deborah DuPree 4463 San Francisco St. Louis MO 63115 4629
4463 San Francisco
Deborah DuPree Ave. St. Louis MO 63115 261-4629

Federation of Block
Deborah DuPree Units Board of Directors 4463 San Francisco St. Louis MO 63115 261-4629
Deborah Durante 3900 Missouri St. Louis MO 63118 664-1872
John Durnell 1842 S. 9th St. Louis MO 63104 [email protected]
John Durnell 1842 S. 9th St St. Louis MO 63104 621-4460
Rebecca Durst 3118 Texas St. Louis MO 63118 [email protected]
CJ Duvall 7919 Bennett St. Louis MO 63117
5035 Manchester
Kate Early YMCA Ave. St. Louis MO 63110 533-0749 [email protected]
Morganford 4346 Fairview
Charlene Earlywine Neighborhood Assoc. Avenue St. Louis MO 63116 664-2546 [email protected]
314-664-
Charlene Earlywine 4390 Beck St. Louis MO 63116 2546 [email protected]
314-962-
Bob Eastin 8657 Litzsinger Rd St. Louis MO 63144 8744
Dick Eaton 1842 S. 9th St St. Louis MO 63104 621-4460 [email protected]
Ingrid Edmund 4961 Lilburn St. Louis MO 63115 381-6746
Tony Edwards 4848 Sacramento St. Louis MO 63115 385-5837
David Eisenbraun 1409 Sullivan St. Louis MO 63107 241-4202 [email protected]
Honorable
Yaphett El-Amin D-57 5058 Durant St. Louis MO 63115 385-3378

201 West
Capitol
Honorable MO House of Ave., Room Jefferson 573-751- yaphett.el-
Yaphett El-Amin D-57 Representatives 109C City MO 65101 2198 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Mary Eldus 614 Wilmington St. Louis MO 63111 352-5946 [email protected]

Donna Ellebracht 2707 A Shenandoah St. Louis MO 63104 [email protected]

314-436-
Connie Eller 3925 N. 20th St. St. Louis MO 63107 0613 [email protected]
314-889-
Richard Ellis 8235 Forsyth Blvd. #1000 Clayton MO 63105 1533
Bob Elsperman 5500 W. Park Ave St. Louis Mo 63110 633-3300 [email protected]
Chesterfiel
Josephine Emerick 14051 Calcutta Drive d MO 63107 429-0100 [email protected]

Shirley Emerson Neighborhood Council 3808 West Florissant St. Louis MO 63107 533-2030
The Neighborhood
Shirley Emerson Council St. Louis MO 63107 533-2030 [email protected]
Kurt Engel 1049 Lafayette St. Louis MO 63104 971-3410 [email protected]
Erica Enright 2520-A S. 12th St. St. Louis MO 63104 578-8727 [email protected]
Mary Entrup 2925 Russell St. Louis MO 63104 446-6470 [email protected]
Dorothy
and
Samuel Eqeston 3954 Greer St. Louis MO 63107
Steven Erickson 2330 Menard St. St. Louis MO 63104 771-1500 [email protected]
314-772-
Thayne Erney 1445 S. 18th #118 St. Louis MO 63104 7958 [email protected]
Bascilisa Escamilla 6412 Pennsylvania St. Louis MO 63111
Juliett Escobar 5418 Louisiana St. Louis MO 63111
Rich Eskew 7807 Vermont St. Louis MO 63111 544-7743
Robert Wood Realty Co. 645-6033 x
Tim Estepp Devel. 625 N Euclid STE 601 St. Louis MO 63108 226 [email protected]
Mark &
Terry Etling 1820 LaSalle St. Louis MO 63104 621-1437 [email protected]

Sunce Europa Bakery & Grocery 2610 Telegraph Road St. Louis MO 63125 479-5759

Marlon Evans 6000 West Florissant St. Louis MO 63136 381-6999

314-832-
Megan Everding 3864 Federer Pl St. Louis MO 63116 0775 [email protected]
Carol Ezell 5528 Mardel St. Louis MO 62109 351-0221
Carol Ezell 5528 Nardel St. Louis MO 63109
Sheraton St. Louis City 400 South 14th 314/613-
Rob Fagen Center Hotel Street St. Louis MO 63103 6401 [email protected]
2144-4 Village Green [email protected]
Tim Fandray Pkwy. St. Louis MO 63017 v
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
314-352-
Cathie Farroll 4321 Beethoven St. Louis MO 63116 6878 [email protected]
Awes Farus 3754 Minnesota St. Louis MO 63118
Valerie Farwell 3854 Sullivan St. Louis MO 63107 533-0124 [email protected]
Deanna Fasnacht 706A Soulard St. St. Louis MO 63104 644-1234 [email protected]
314-352-
W. Charles Feaman 224 Elwood Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 3822
314-342-
Margorie Feldman 466 Fourwynel Drive St. Louis MO 63141 0792
1001 Highlands Plaza 314-429-
Mark Felton URS Corp. Dr. West Suite 300 St. Louis MO 63110 0100
Stan &
Jackie Ferguson 4424 Ellewood St. Louis MO 63116
Matt Fernandez 5344 Lindenwood St. Louis MO 63109 630-8693 [email protected]
Julia Ferrara 5133 Wilson Ave. St. Louis MO 63110
Real Estate Interests 40900 Woodward Bloomfield 248-554-
Jill Ferrari Group, Inc. Ave. Suite 130 Hills MI 48304 4223
St. Louis Development 314-454-
Gary Filmore Corp. 1015 Locust Street St. Louis MO 63101 1894 [email protected]
Brad Finkeldei 2859 Salena Apt 2F St. Louis MO 63118 776-2898 [email protected]
Carr Sq. Tenant Mgmt.
Shirley Finley Corp. 1521 Carr Dr. St. Louis MO 63106 421-4188 [email protected]
St. Louis Housing
Shirley Finley Authority 4100 Lindell St. Louis MO 63108 421-4188 [email protected]
Mike Finnegan 1230 Russell Blvd. St. Louis MO 63104 330-6167 [email protected]

Catherine Fisher 4215 Cleveland Ave. St. Louis MO 63110 604-7355 [email protected]
Great Rivers Greenway 1000 St. Louis Union 314-436-
David Fisher District Station Suite 102 St. Louis MO 63103 7009 [email protected]
Matt Fisher 1913 A Senate St. Louis MO 63118 [email protected]
Beryl Fitzenrider 2228 Montana St. Louis MO 63118 481-1679

Berkley Fitzenrieder 2243 Montana St. Louis MO 63118 353-2177

Beryl Fitzenrieder 2228 Montana St. Louis MO 63118 481-1679

Joe Fitzgerald 2317C S. 10th St. St. Louis MO 63104 639-0273 [email protected]
Eric Fix 1049 Lafayette St. Louis MO 63104 588-1409 [email protected]

Dick Fleming RCGA One Metropolitan Sq. Suite 1300 St. Louis MO 63102 444-1155
Daniel Flier 3235 Indiana Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 664-2977
Michael Flihry 4108 Louisiana Ave St. Louis MO 63118
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007

Alderwoma St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City

n Jennifer Florida Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
Alderwoma St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
n Dionne Flowers Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
Lura Flowers 6141 A Colorado St. Louis MO 63111 802-7732 [email protected]
Suzanne Fontaine 1226 Victor St. St. Louis MO 63104 773-4225 [email protected]
Cizerine Ford 1537 McLaran St. Louis MO 63147 388-5850
Ida Ford City Hall 1200 Market Street Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103 622-4273
314-647-
Jim Ford 1417 Rankin Drive St. Louis MO 63117 1663 [email protected]
2608 Louisiana, Apt. 314-771-
Mary Ford 35 St. Louis MO 63118 5782
773-4892
Gravois Park Block Link Post Office Box home: 664-
Rita Ford Association 27152 St. Louis MO 63111 3425 [email protected]
Rita Ford 3521 Nebraska St. Louis MO 63118 664-3425
Rita Ford 3521 Nebraska St. Louis MO 63118

Alderwoma St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City 241-1626 or

n April Ford-Griffin Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103 622-3287
Andrew Formenti 3235 Indiana Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 [email protected]
Pamela Forness 7408 Michigan Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 481-4520
Fairground East
Neighborhood
Ira Fowlkes Association 3808 West Florissant St. Louis MO 63107 535-5248
Charles Fox 4126 West Lee Ave. St. Louis MO 63115
Ivan Francisco 3415 Itaska St. Louis MO 63111
Joe Frank 3229-A Oregon Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 771-7036 [email protected]
Darnell &
Tasha Franks 3702 Oregon St. Louis MO 63118 865-1412
Honorable
Barbara Fraser D-83 581 Stratford Avenue St. Louis MO 63130 725-8683

201 West
Capitol
Honorable MO House of Ave., Room Jefferson 573-751-
Barbara Fraser D-83 Representatives 115E City MO 65101 4163 [email protected]
Downtown Residents 1709 Washington
Brad Fratello Association Avenue St. Louis MO 63103 984-7634

Ray Freeman 3608 Montana Apt. 3 West St. Louis MO 63116 752-3877
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
9137 MellowRidge
Yvette Freeman Court St. Louis MO 63136 867-0792 [email protected]

Ross Friedman 9816 Duke Dr. St. Louis MO 63136 388-4779 [email protected]

Raymond Friem Metro 707 North First Street St. Louis MO 63102 982-1553 [email protected]
Dale Friesen 2204 S. 11th St. St. Louis MO 63104 776-0475
314-771-
John Frisella 5136 Bischott St. Louis MO 63110 9888

Mark Frumhoff 3660 Connecticut St. St. Louis MO 63116

barbara.funk@anheuser-
Barbara Funk 7402 S. Grand St. Louis MO 63111 832-7483 busch.com

Joor Fuoss 1136 Wahington Ave. St. Louis MO 63101

314-533-
Regina Furr 4352 Gibson St. Louis MO 63110 2448

Victoria Gadley 808 Josephine Baker St. Louis MO 63106 371-1001 [email protected]
Bob Gaffner United Way of St Louis 910 N. 11th Street St. Louis MO 539-4297
Nancy Galvin 2012 Withnell St. Louis MO 63118 322-3243 [email protected]
Derio Gambaro 5320 Wilson St. Louis MO 63110 776-4808
4303 S.
Greg Gambaro Kingshighway St. Louis MO 63109
3125 N. Spaulding
David Garcia Ave. Apt. 2W Chicago IL 60618 314 7629068 [email protected]
Giuseppe Garibaldi 5307 Shaw Ave. St. Louis MO 63110
LaRhonda Garrett 4400 Norfolk Ave. St. Louis MO 63110 534-9693 [email protected]
972-980-
Printice Gary Carleton Residential 5485 Belt Line Road Suite 290 Dallas TX 75240 9810 [email protected]
Carole Gates PO Box 5012 St. Louis MO 63115
Caroline Gates 1938A Palm St. St. Louis MO 63107 241-1995
Ted Gatlin 5616 Enright Apt. 307 St. Louis MO 63115 584-0657

Annie Gatling 1418A Union St. Louis MO 63113 314361-5458

Bill Gavin 1835 S. 9th St. St. Louis MO 63104 231-3701 [email protected]
Deputy Mayor, City of 200 City 314-622-
Barbara Geisman St. Louis 1200 Market Street Hall St. Louis MO 63103 4792 [email protected]
314-997-
Josh Geltman 15 Crosswinds Dr. Olivette MO 63132 1759 [email protected]
Peter Genovese 1922 Sidney St. St. Louis MO 63104 226-9026
Wilma Gentry 3828 Minnesota St. Louis MO 63118 776-2039 [email protected]
Wilma Gentry 3828 Minnesota St. Louis MO 63118 776-2039
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Wilma Gentry 3828 Missesota St. Louis MO 63118 776-2039 [email protected]
314-352-
Carolyn George 946 Bellerive Blvd. St. Louis MO 63111 8608

Steph George 4068 Magnolia Place St. Louis MO 63110

Stephen Gerrie 7108 Whaley Place St. Louis MO 63116
771-3101 /
Shaw Neighborhood 2211 South 39th home: 773-
Jenny Gerstner Improvement Assoc. Street St. Louis MO 63110 4872 [email protected]
Trudy Gerszewski 3744 Louisiana St. Louis MO 63118 865-0686
Hans Gerwitz 703 N. 13th St. #401 St. Louis MO 63103 [email protected]

Jay & Carla Gibbs 1836 S. 8th St. St. Louis MO 63104 241-3894 [email protected]
Jim Gilbert 3426 Juniata St. Louis MO 63118 435-3476
Laura Gilbert 3503 Crittenden St. St. Louis MO 63118 865-5592 [email protected]
Hannah Gilk 3649 Wisconsin St. Louis MO 63118 [email protected]
Amrit Gill 3701 Lindell St. Louis MO 63108 [email protected]
314-863-
Dan Gillespie 7056 Maryland Ave St. Louis MO 63130 6565 [email protected]
314-452-
Mike Glodeck 3359 S. Jefferson St. Louis MO 63118 4495 [email protected]
Hattie Glover 4967 Lilburn St. Louis MO 63115 385-1894
314-531-
Josh Golden 4548 Fair St. Louis MO 63115 8097 [email protected]
Don & 985-774- [email protected]
Meredith Goldman 3936 Connecticut St. St. Louis MO 63116 4361 m
Chris Goodson Gilded Age 1915 Park Ave. 2nd Floor St. Louis MO 63104 241-0811 [email protected]
Sam Graefe 6305 Peshing St. Louis MO 63130 [email protected]

Chad Graham 1911 S. 11th St. Rear St. Louis MO 63104 421-1746 [email protected]
Clifton Graham 3736 Natural Bridge St. Louis MO 63107 494-6769
690 Osceola Ave. Winter (407) 647-
Fred Grant #605 Park FL 32789 3992 [email protected]
Joella Grant 3958 Miami St. Louis MO 63116 776-2520
Ruby Grant 1130 Penrose St. Louis MO 63107 436-4045
[email protected]
Charles Gray 7101 Minnesota St. Louis MO 63111 749-3750 m
314-772- [email protected]
Dana Gray 4921 Columbia St. Louis MO 63139 6082 g
314-771-
Diana Gray 1619 Missouri Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 5695 [email protected]
Jeff Gray 1010 Pine 21-E-15 St. Louis MO 63101 235-5685
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Martin Luther King 4214 East Dr. Martin
Walter Gray Business Association Luther King Drive St. Louis MO 63113 533-3906
314-241-
Rich Greason 3519 N. 14th St. St. Louis MO 63107 9165 [email protected]
Honorable Comptroller, City of St. 63103-
Darlene Green Louis 1200 Market Street Room 212 St. Louis MO 3201 622-3201
James Green 3618 N. Spring St. Louis MO 63107 531-2284

Barry Greene 1813 Cochran Place St. Louis MO 63106 239-5513

Gail Greene 2215 Menard st. St. Louis MO 63104 865-0706
1445-47 North 9th
Valarie Greer Street St. Louis MO 63106
Alderman St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
Stephen Gregali Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
St. Louis Housing
Quarnette Gregory Authority 4100 Lindell St. Louis MO 63108 436-9598
314-962-
Michael Grewe GJ Grewe, Inc 9109 Watson Road 3rd Floor St. Louis MO 63126 6300
660-665-
Linda Grgurich 900 E. Lattarpe Kirksville MO 63501 1962 [email protected]
Christine Grib 880 Borgia Lane Florissant MO 63031 [email protected]
314-566-
Michael Griewing 1223 Sidney Street St. Louis MO 63104 0674 [email protected]
3248 Country Hollow 314-892-
Susan Griffey Dr. St. Louis MO 63129 0907

Jacqueline Griffin 4946 Maffitt St. Louis MO 63113 367-2291

Federation of Block 8611 Lynhaven

Louise Griffin Units Board of Directors 63147 St. Louis MO 63147 382-5751
Marco Grifford 2240 Machlink St. Louis MO 63110
Kathy Grillo 2605 Pennsylvania St. Louis MO 63118 771-2186 [email protected]
Chesterfiel
Larry Grither MoDOT 1590 Woodlake Dr. d MO 63017 340-4509 [email protected]
Beverly Groaning 3628 Virginia St. Louis MO 63118 771-4670
McGowan Bros Dvlpmt
Jeanne Groaning Corp., LLC 1221 Locust St. Louis MO 63103 231-2005 [email protected]
O. John Groebl 3401 Halliday Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 776-3017
Mark Groth 6405 Ruth Dr. St. Louis MO 63116 [email protected]
George Grove 1842 S. 8th St. St. Louis MO 63104 621-7549 [email protected]
4501
Westminist St.
Gail Gueeker SSND MCU er Palce Louis MO 63108 314-367-3484
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
314-351-
William Gutridge 3647 Blow St. St. Louis MO 63116 7121
Hattie Guydon 4518 San Francisco St. Louis MO 63115 385-7268
314-482-
Troy Guzman 2611 Alfred St. Louis MO 63110 3807

Holly Hills Improvement Post Office Box

Dan Haag Association 22144 St. Louis MO 63116 569-5708 [email protected]
Whitney Haas & James Otto 810 Ann Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 577-6272 [email protected]
314-481-
Kevin Hacker 5736 Milentz Ave. St. Louis MO 63109 3711 [email protected]
Jayson Hagen 5438 Walsh St. St. Louis MO 63109 [email protected]
Judy Hagen 121 Fillmore St. Louis MO 63111 616-3720
Diana Hager 4059 Fairview St. Louis MO 63116 664-4247
Bernie Haggerty & Sally Durbin 2408 S. 18th St. Louis MO 63104 772-0092 [email protected]
Isaiah Hair 1601 Hogan St. Louis MO 63106 378-7294
Near Northside
Isaiah Hair, Jr. Neighborhood Council 1601 Hogan Street St. Louis MO 63106
Saint Louis University
Susan Hakes Hospital 3655 Vista Ave. Suite 100 St. Louis MO 63110 268-5770 [email protected]
Mphamad Hakim 3443 Mcean Ave. St. Louis MO
314-361-
Fred Hale 34 Waterman Place St. Louis MO 63112 7502
314-776-
Julie Hale 3838 Castleman St. Louis MO 63110 6756
City Hall -1200
Kathy Hale Office of the Mayor Market Room 200 St. Louis MO 63103 622-4035 [email protected]

Maggie Hales One S. Memorial Dr. St. Louis MO 63102

417-496-
Andie Hall 22 Beverly Drive Olivette MO 63132 5606 [email protected]
Leslie Hall 6347 Plymouth Wellston MO 63133
Otta Hall 3908 Greer St St. Louis MO 63101 652-6022
Scott Hall 4160 Shaw St. Louis MO 63110 664-2542
314-771-
Suzy & Jeff Hall 2815 Russell Blvd. St. Louis MO 63104 4579
Karen Halliburton 10702 Wheeling Ct. St. Louis MO 63136
2525 Spring Valley 636-447-
Christine Hallowell Dr. St. Peters MO 63376 3554 [email protected]
Caroline Halyburton 1200 Market Rm. 418 St. Louis MO 63103 613-7148 [email protected]
Caroline Halyburton 1200 Market Rm 418 St. Louis MO 63103 613-7148
Jennifer Hamlet 2350 Klemm St. St. Louis MO 63110 771-9922 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Hammersmit
Kent h Gate District 3107 Carocine St. St. Louis MO 63104
Erin Hammond 4158 Shaw St. Louis MO 63110 772-8644
Dennis Hampton 1201 Douglas St. St. Louis MO 62060
Frank Hamsher Fleishman-Hillard 200 N. Broadway St. Louis MO 63102 982-0555 [email protected]
Betty Hancock 3520 Grace St. Louis MO 63116 865-2460
Virginia Hanlon 4351 Osceola St. Louis MO 63116

Alderwoma St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City

n Kathleen Hanrahan Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
630-881-
Brette Hansen & Sean Kelley 1523 S. 8th St. #417 St. Louis MO 63104 4431
Rick Hansen U.S. Fish & Wildlife 101 Park DeVille Suite A Columbia MO 65203 573-234-
Services 2132
314-367-
Davitta Hanson 4501 Westminster St. Louis MO 63108 3484 [email protected]
Eric &
Shannon Hanson 1625 S. 9th St. St. Louis MO 63104 436-9301 [email protected]
Burghoff Development, 338 S. Kirkwood
Jane Harleman LLC Road Suite 103 St. Louis MO 63122 835-0200 [email protected]
Lavon Harper Pyramid Properties 4400 Laclede Ave. St. Louis MO 63108 652-4258 [email protected]
Lucille Harper 1521 Eton Lane St. Louis MO 63147 382-5140

Amos Harris 312 N. 8th Lofts, LLC 906 Olive St. Suite 1212 St. Louis MO 63101 231-0400 [email protected]
1445-47 North 9th
Angela Harris Street St. Louis MO 63106
Darryl Harris 811 Hornsby St. Louis MO 63147 388-0035

Ginger Harris 9932 Litzsinger Road St. Louis MO 63124 994-7106 [email protected]
Jermell Harris 6347 Plymouth Wellston MO 63133
415 N . Tucker, Apt. 314-588-
Marlene Harris 637 St. Louis MO 63101 8846
Marlene Harris 415 N. Tucker #367 St. Louis MO 63103
Webster 314-963-
Todd Harris 469 Algonquin Place Groves MO 63119 3504
Ron harryman 2824 Shenandoah St. Louis MO 63104
William Hart 3319 Indiana Ave. St. Louis MO 63118
Melanie Harvey 4515 Maryland #511 St. Louis MO 63108 367-3098 [email protected]
314-367-
Melanie Harvey 4515 Maryland # 511 St. Louis MO 63108 3098 [email protected]
Susan Harvey 3670 Flora St. Louis MO 63110
West Florissant 5226A West
Eddie Hasan Business Assoc. Florissant St. Louis MO 63115
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Missouri Department of Chesterfiel 314-340-
Ed Hassinger Transportation 1590 Woodlake Drive d MO 63011 4200 [email protected]

Morganford Betterment
Angela Hastings Association 3234 Morganford St. Louis MO 63116
Barbara Hathaway 1510 Veronica St. Louis MO 63147
618-416-
Leslie Hattle 1663 Hartman Lane Apt. 2 St. Louis MO 62221 1391 [email protected]
3614
Lemay Ferry Reavis
Chamber of Barracks St.
Greg Hayden President Commerce Rd Louis MO 63125 314-892-5200
Cliotln Hayes 1909 East Warne St. Louis MO 63107
Honorable Jefferson 573-751-
Rit Heard Days D-14 State Capitol Building Room 427 City MO 65101 4106
314-481-
Ray Hearn 607 N. Grand St. Louis MO 63103 2525 [email protected]
Peggy Heath 3454 Missouri St. Louis MO 63118 773-8458
John Hecht 2331 S. 12th St. St. Louis MO 63104 773-1210 [email protected]
Orchard Development jhederman@orcharddevelopme
Jay Hederman Co. 409 N. 15th St. St. Louis MO 63103 436-7400 ntgroup.com
Steve Hegel 4354 ITaska St. Louis MO 63116 752-5347

Lemay Development 744 Lemay St.

Barbara Hehmeyer Corporation Ferry Louis MO 63125 314-631-2796
314-621-
Llew Heigham 1801 LaSalle St. St. Louis MO 63104 3077 [email protected]
llewellyn Heigham 1801 LaSalle Street St. Louis MO 63104 621-3077 [email protected]
Jenny Heim 4046 Wyoming St St. Louis MO 63116 jennyheim2yahoo.com
314-773-
Jenny Heim 4046 Wyoming St. St. Louis MO 63116 3684

Jenny Heim 4046 Wyoming Street St. Louis MO 63116 773-3684 [email protected]
Beth Heine 1922 Sidney St. St. Louis MO 63104 226-9026
Alderman St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
Fred Heitert Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103

Karen Heitzman 4002 Magnolia Place St. Louis MO 63110 773-0908

100 Chesterfield
Business Pkwy Ste. 636-728-
Mike Hejna Gundaker Commercial 300 St. Louis MO 63005 5100
Craig Heller LoftWorks, LLC 317 N. 11th St. Suite 500 St. Louis MO 63101 241-6702 [email protected]
Stephanie Henderson 1st Ward P.O. Box 150283 St. Louis MO 63115 497-3878 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Stephanie Henderson P.O. Box 150283 St. Louis MO 63115
Kimberly Hendricks 6928 Chippewa #2W St. Louis MO 63109 [email protected]
Dean Henke 2218 Oregon St. Louis MO 63104
Emily Henke 2219 Oregon St. Louis MO 63104
314-722-
Harry Hennemann 2629 Armand Pl. St. Louis MO 63104 6493
121 S. St.
Glenn Henninger South Area Engineer St. Louis Co. H&T Meramec 8th Floor Louis MO 63105 314-615-8597
U.S. Department of
Housing & Urban Room
Rich Herbst Development 1222 Spruce St. 3.207 St. Louis MO 63103 539-6541 [email protected]
Christian Herman 4255 Joniath St. St. Louis MO 63116
314-325-
David Herman 3504 Sorrel Tree Ln St. Louis MO 63127 8482 [email protected]
7055 Lansdowne 314-795-
Justo Herrera Ave. St. Louis MO 63109 8181 [email protected]
City Hall
Dena Hibbard 1200 Market Street Rm 418 St. Louis MO 63103 613-3109
Rochelle Hickman 4035 N. Taylor St. Louis MO 63115 381-7652 [email protected]
Eugene Higgins 3529a Giles St. Louis MO 63116 229-3772 [email protected]
Ron Hill 9737 Mueik Terr. St. Louis MO 63119
James &
Cora Hines 3963 A Lexington St. Louis MO 63107 533-4785
Anthony Hoang 3823 Bingham Ave. St. Louis MO 63116
Colin Hobart Kingdom House 1321 South 11th St. St. Louis MO 63104 421-0400 [email protected]
Patricia Hoffman 1425 Missouri Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 771-4381 [email protected]
314-621- [email protected]
Ben Hoffmann 4172 Russell 1E St. Louis MO 63110 4160 om
154 Buck Creek
Jeanne Hogan Road Silex MO 63377 [email protected]
314-773-
Paul Hohmann 6165 Westminister Pl St. Louis MO 63112 7333 [email protected]
Glenda Holifield 2337 S. 13th St. St. Louis MO 63104 771-8517 [email protected]
Kara Holland 8015 S. Skinlas St. Louis MO 63105 [email protected]
Holloman
Warren Sr. 5433 Vernon St. Louis MO 63112 [email protected]
Virginia Holloran 4029 Miami St. Apt. 2 St. Louis MO 63116
Carrie Holloway 1822 Geyer Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 762-9999 [email protected]
Carrie Holloway 1822 Geyer Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 762-9999
Debbie Holloway 1822 Geyer Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 762-9999 [email protected]
Debbie Holloway 1822 Geyer Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 762-9999
13028 Jamestowne 314-985-
Gail Holmes Ridge Lane St. Louis MO 631033 1756 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Dale &
Theresa Holmstrom 3141 Magnolia Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 664-4555 [email protected]
Tisha Hoofman 1109 Sidney St. St. Louis MO 63104 302-2916 [email protected]

Jacqueline Hooker 3632 Cote Brilliante St. Louis MO 63113 534-9194 [email protected]
Otto Horak 2130 Allen Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 772-5908 [email protected]
Otto Horak 2130 Allen Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 772-5908
Pat Horak 2130 Allen Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 772-5908

East-West Gateway
Brian Horton Council of Government One Memorial Drive Suite 1600 St. Louis MO 63102 421-4220 [email protected]
Keith Houghton 1805 Lasalle St. Louis MO 63104
Jeff Howe 3759 Westminister St. Louis MO 63108
Honorable
Rodney Hubbard D-58 1546 Biddle St. Louis MO 63106 621-3750

201 West
Capitol
Honorable MO House of Ave., Room Jefferson 573-751- [email protected]
Rodney Hubbard D-58 Representatives 109F City MO 65101 2383 ov
Justin Hubbard 4042 Mcree St. Louis MO 63110
K. Huddleston 4333 Patomac St. St. Louis MO 63116 776-2055

Federation of Block
Beatrice Hudson Units Board of Directors 4303 DeSoto St. Louis MO 63107 535-3246
Beatrice Hudson 4303 DeSoto Ave. St. Louis MO 63107 535-3246
Duane Huff 2925 McNair Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 771-7174
Matthew Huff 3300 Magnolia St. Louis MO 63118 488-0007 [email protected]
Marvin Huggins 5732 White Pine Dr. St. Louis MO 63129 [email protected]
Ashley Hughes 1314 Walton St. Louis MO 63113 367-8004
Cheryl Hughes 2634 Russell Blvd St. Louis MO 63104
Lonnie Hughes Gate District 1554 California St. St. Louis MO 63104 771-8728 [email protected]
Paula Hughes 4060 Cora St. Louis MO 63115 382-1095 [email protected]
3800
Howard
Pinnacle Hughes Las
Wade Hundley President Entertainment Parkway Vegas NV 89109 702-784-7777
Kathryn Benton Park
and Neighborhood
Andrew Hurley Association 3001 Salena St. St. Louis MO 63118 776-4683 [email protected]

John Hurt Sigma Capital, Inc. 7560 Reinhold Drive Cincinnati OH 45237
Dave Hutti 4061 Fairview St. Louis MO 63116 664-7663 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Nerlita Hutti 3735 Wisconsin St. Louis MO 63118 773-4392
314-776-
Carol Iglauer 4046 Magnolia Place St. Louis MO 63110 0918 [email protected]
Alex Ihnen 4460 Gibson St. Louis MO 63110 [email protected]
AJ Iovanna 3651 Bowen St. St. Louis MO 63116 353-1008 [email protected]
Carolyn Iovanna 4031 Flora Place St. Louis MO 63110

Dutchtown South
Debbie Irwin Community Corporation 4204 Virginia Avenue St. Louis MO 63111 352-4865 [email protected]

Tom Irwin RCGA One Metropolitan Sq. Suite 1300 St. Louis MO 63102 444-1155
[email protected]
David Jackson 4630 Penrose St. Louis MO 63115 565-9476 m
Linda Jackson 3535 Minnesota St. Louis MO 63118 239-5686
Dianna Jadwin 4510 Arsenal St. Louis MO 63116 773-2802
Bret James 310 W. Schirmer St. Louis MO 63111 544-8803
1445-47 North 9th
Deantta James Street St. Louis MO 63106
Dennis James Gladstones 1800 S. 10th St. St. Louis MO 63104
Katie Jansen 4501 Westminister St. Louis MO 63108 [email protected]
Phil Jarvis 2844 Arsenal St. Louis MO 63118 664-4092 [email protected]
Dan Jay 4388 McPherson St. Louis MO 63108 652-4275 [email protected]
Renee Jeep The Soulard School 1110 Victor St. Louis MO 63104 865-2799
Roberts Brothers shellyj@roberts-
Shelly Jenkins Companies 911 Locust Street St. Louis MO 63101 621-5443 companies.com
Barbara Jennings 6408 Michigan St. Louis MO 63111
206-546-
Scott Jepson Abt Associates 20201 21st Place NW Shoreline WA 98177 0635 [email protected]
Jay Jernigan 4049 Russell Blvd. St. Louis MO 63110 [email protected]
Andria Jimerson United Way of St Louis 910 N. 11th Street St. Louis MO 63103 539-4297 [email protected]
Tezetta Johansen 1223 Partridge St. Louis MO 63130
Rajeev John Grace Hill 2524 Hadley St. Louis MO 63106 814-8755 [email protected]
Barbara Johnson P.O. Box 25803 St. Louis MO 63136 718-8312

771-0803 /
Benton Park West 776-
Chad Johnson Neighborhood Assoc. P.O. Box 18671 St. Louis MO 63118 4447(home) [email protected]
314-772-
Heather Johnson 2835 Accomac Street St. Louis MO 63104 1098
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007

201 West
Capitol
Honorable MO House of Ave., Room Jefferson 573-751- [email protected]
Connie Johnson D-61 Representatives 302-1 City MO 65101 7605 v
314-367-
Jacob Johnson 954 Laurel St. Louis MO 63112 3149 [email protected]
Joe Johnson 4538 Wichita St. Louis MO 63110 [email protected]
Kadi Jo Johnson & Benito Motez 2716 S. 13th St. St. Louis MO 63118 588-9114 [email protected]
Morris Johnson 5600 Oakland St. Louis Mo 63110 644-9743 [email protected]
Martin Luther King West 5515 Dr. Martin
James Joiner Business Assoc. Luther King Drive St. Louis MO 63112 361-7211 [email protected]
Adella Jones Metro 707 1st St. St. Louis MO 63102 982-1552 [email protected]
41 S.
Alderwoma County Executive's St. Louis County Central
n Bennice Jones Office / St. Louis County Executive's Office Ave. St. Louis MO 63105 [email protected]
1200
Market
St. Louis Board of Street --
Brandyn Jones Aldermen City Hall Room 232 St. Louis MO 63103 589-6804 [email protected]
Brian Jones 4462 Floriss St. Louis MO 63115 385-7127
Carl Jones 3320 Michigan Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 664-7872 [email protected]
1445-47 North 9th
Delores Jones Street St. Louis MO 63106
Jary Jones 4822 Sacramento St. Louis MO 63115 389-7384
1045 Kings Mountain
Joshua Jones LN Ranlo NC 28054
Mable Jones 4115 Dryden Ave. St. Louis MO 63115 382-0249
Mable Jones 4115 Dryden Ave. St. Louis MO 63115 382-0249
St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
Bennice Jones-King Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
Bennice Jones-King 4435 Holly Ave. St. Louis MO 63115 385-9553
314-420-
Cheryl Jordan 4398 West Pine #109 St. Louis MO 63108 3984 [email protected]
Vickie Jordan 4444 Wallace St. Louis MO 63116 [email protected]
Jessie Jordon 4512 Bessie Ave. St. Louis MO 63115
Susan Kaim 4340 Taft Ave. St. Louis MO 63116
865-5530
Chris Kalter 4168 Juniata St. Louis MO 63116 x106 [email protected]
Timothy Kaminski 2003 Allen St. Louis MO 63104 772-1970
Kamphoefne Duke Realty 635 Maryland Centre 314-212-
Mark r Corporation Dr. Suite 200 St. Louis MO 63141 8000
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
314-469-
Don Karbay 13818-c Amiot St. Louis MO 63146 5957
Gannon Management
Debbie Kast Co. 11301 Olive Blvd. St. Louis MO 63141 989-9600
Joanne Keay 785 Jamaica Pl Florissant MO 63033 [email protected]

C. Keen 707 Forest Wildwood MO 63011

2611 Arkansas Ave,
Clayton Keeney Apt. A St. Louis MO 63118
Kevin Keller 4034 Phillips Ave. St. Louis MO 63116 771-9975 [email protected]

Bryan Keller, CPA RBG & CO One North Brentwood St. Louis MO 63105 290-3300 [email protected]
Karen Kelly 2835 McNair St. Louis MO 63118 771-3403
618-622-
Christine Kelso 207 Coles County Dr. O'Fallon IL 62269 3035 [email protected]
Samantha Kendall 2800 Olive 18c St. Louis MO 63103 533-6531
Alderman St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
Terry Kennedy Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
St.
Harry Kennedy Senator 4959 Sutherland Louis MO 63109 (314) 481-5857
Honorable
Harry Kennedy D-1 4959 Sutherland St. Louis MO 63109 481-5857
Honorable Jefferson 573-751-
Harry Kennedy D-1 State Capitol Building Room 226 City MO 65101 2126

Lynn Kennedy 1326 Shepard Road Wildwood MO 63038

Ryan Kennedy 3831 Russell St. Louis MO 63110 664-7448

Michael Kennedy, Sr. KAI 211 N. Broadway Suite 1900 St. Louis MO 63102 754-5593
Dodie Kerman 5622 S. Magnolia St. Louis MO 63139

Steve Kidwell 4167 Castleman Ave. St. Louis MO 63110 772-9042 [email protected]

773-8003 or
Kathy Kilkenny 5141 Pattison St. Louis MO 63110 681-8955 [email protected]
Mike Killeen 1909 Sidney St. St. Louis MO 63104
Kimbrough
Willie Jr. 4399 Forest Park Apt. 148 St. Louis MO 63108
Ed Kinder 5346 West Ave. St. Louis MO 63116 832-1083
George Kindler 6408 Michigan St. Louis MO 63111 481-3609
Doug King 5050 Oakland St. Louis Mo 63110 289-4974
Kevin King 808 Ann Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 518-5333 [email protected]
Kimaley King 3714 Oregon St. Louis MO 63118 773-7697 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Patsy King 3625 Flad St. Louis MO 63110 776-6263
King 413-210-
Benjamin McShane 906 Russell Blvd. St. Louis MO 63104 2904 [email protected]
Guy Kingsley 1852 S. 10th St. Louis MO 63104 231-0537 [email protected]
Don &
Jeanne Kirby 2410 S. 18th St. St. Louis MO 63104 577-5018 [email protected]
Finis T. Kirkland 902 iron St. Louis MO 63111

Alderwoma St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City

n Dorothy Kirner Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
Dan Kirner 3754 Taft St. Louis MO 63116 351-5346
Paul Kjorlie 2307 S. 11th St. St. Louis MO 63104 771-6377 [email protected]
Harold Klees 3453 Humphrey St. St. Louis MO 63118 776-6640 [email protected]
1110 Washington Leasing
Kathy Kleinman Landmark Capital, LLC Ave. Office St. Louis MO 63101 588-9992 [email protected]
Jim Klenke 1828 S. 8th St. St. Louis MO 63104 588-1090 [email protected]

Lee Kling 3968 Flora Place St. Louis MO 63110 497-6248 [email protected]

Dean Klinkenberg 3932 Cleveland St. Louis MO 63110

4175 Loughborough
Joanne Kluba Ave. St. Louis MO 63116
314-922-
Ryan Klug PO Box 70 Texas City TX 77592 8878 [email protected]
Jack Knapp 2023 Geyer Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 773-3906 [email protected]
Jack Knapp 2023 Geyer Ave. St. Louis MO 63104
314-982-
Steve Knobbe 707 N. First St. St. Louis MO 63021 1475 [email protected]
Knobbe,
Stephanie P.E. Metro 707 North First St. St. Louis MO 63102 982-1475 [email protected]
Jon Knodel US Environmental Mailcode 901 N. 5th Kansas KS 66101 913-551-
Protection Agency ARTD/APCO St. City 7148
Kelli Knopf Loftworks, LLC 317 N. 11th St. Louis MO 63101 220-0854 [email protected]
314-524-
Elaine Knox 7831 Atherstone Normandy MO 63121 4903
Frederick Koch 3126 Dontis St. Louis MO 63116 496-6467
Helen Koenig 3970 Hartford St. St. Louis MO 63116 776-1985 [email protected]
636-338-
Frank Koeninger 720 Lami St. St. Louis MO 63104 4331 [email protected]
Neighborhood
Brian Kolde Stabilization Tean 1200 Market St. Room 418 St. Louis MO 63103 613-3164 [email protected]
314-727-
Jim Koman Koman Properties 8027 Forsyth Blvd. Suite 100 St. Louis MO 63105 8881
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Bernell Konradi 2848 Arsenal St. St. Louis MO 63118 771-8048

J. Civic Opera Bldg., 20 312-346-

Christopher Kopp Cambridge Systematics North Wacker Dr. Suite 1475 Chicago IL 60606 9907 [email protected]
314-752-
Roman Kordal 5521 Alaska Ave St. Louis MO 63111 2304
1010 St. Charles 636-532-
Judy Korn ReMax Properties Street Apt. #903 St. Louis MO 63101 5900 [email protected]

Judy Korn Welsch Flatness & Lutz 308 N. 21 St. St. Louis MO 63103 283-0572 [email protected]
Roman Koror 5521 Alaska Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 752-2304
steve.kotsines@anheuser-
Steve Kotsines 2331 S. 12th St. St. Louis MO 63104 773-1210 busch.com
Joy Koustatske 1175 Appleseed Ln St. Louis MO 63132
Bob Kraiberg & Kathy Duckworth 1832 S. 8th St. St. Louis MO 63104 436-3603 [email protected]

Bill Krantz 1960 Arsenal st. St. Louis MO 63118 772-1190 [email protected]
Carmella Kranz 1916 Hebert St. Louis MO 63107 496-8061
Honorable
Fred Kratky D-65 6001 Bishops Place St. Louis MO 63109 646-8800

201 West
Capitol
Honorable MO House of Ave., Room Jefferson 573-751-
Fred Kratky D-65 Representatives 101C City MO 65101 4220 [email protected]
Rachel Kraus Loftworks, LLC 317 N. 11th St. Louis MO 63101 575-9978 [email protected]
Cohen-Esrey Real
Shannon Kreader Estate Services 1531 Washington Ave St. Louis MO 63103 436-6545 [email protected]
Alderwoma St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
n Lyda Krewson Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
Brian Kroeller 1705 S. 9th St. A St. Louis MO 63104 330-4106 [email protected]
314-863-
Peter Krombach Grubb Ellis Krombach 7701 Forsyth Blvd Suite 700 St. Louis MO 63105 4888
Mark Kross Missouri Department of 105 W. Capital P. O. Box Jefferson MO 65102 573-751-
Transportation 270 City 4606
Richard Krull 3229 Childress St. Louis MO
Fran Krupp 3157 Sublette St. Louis MO 63139 444-0100 [email protected]
314-353-
Peter Kucharczyk 6021 Michigan Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 7189
5045 Cote Brilliante 314-367-
Joseph Kucieuczyk Ave. St. Louis MO 63113 2658
Jason Kuhl 4168 Shaw St. Louis MO 63110 664-1466
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
314-353-
Dorothy Kundert 6416 Alabama St. Louis MO 63111 6916
Margaret Kvehn 4171 Flad St. Louis MO 63110 773-0612
314.303.823
Gabriel Kveton 3539 Giles St. Louis MO 63116 0 [email protected]
314-303-
Gabriel Kyeton 3539 Giles St. Louis MO 63116 8230 [email protected]
314-422-
John Lacy 2972 Ridgeway Ave St. Louis MO 63114 6104
Georin LaGrant 3421 Oregon St. Louis MO 63118 762-9729
Susan LaGrune 4773 Lexington St. Louis MO 63115 382-1529
Matt LaMartina & Polly Bathe 2352 S. 13th St. St. Louis MO 63104 865-5143 [email protected]
Angela Lamb 3912 Flora Place St. Louis MO 63110 865-0324
Barbara Lambert 4673 Kossath Ave. St. Louis MO 63115 383-5159
Maggie Lampe 5125 Vermont Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 832-7378 [email protected]
1001Highlands Plaza
Don Land Balke Brown & Assoc. Dr. W St. Louis MO 63110 621-1414 [email protected]
Richard Langhans 2116 Sublette Ave. St. Louis MO 63110
314-772-
Pam Lanning 3437 Indiana St. Louis MO 63118 0380 [email protected]
Pamela Lanning 3437 Indiana Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 [email protected]
Barb Lansing 3972 Federer Place St. Louis MO 63116 457-1195 [email protected]
Rich LaPlume 3322 Lemp St. Louis MO 63118

Ann Larson 4207 A Shenandoah St. Louis MO 63110 773-3472

Trajano Latorre 3626 Flora St. Louis MO 63110
Charles Lavazzi & Sherry McCowan 2619 S. 11th St. St. Louis MO 63118 [email protected]
Chippewa/Broadway/Jef
ferson Development 8970 Laclede Station
Frank Lavine Corp. Road St. Louis MO 63123
Chris Lawrence 8101 Roxburgh Dr. Apt. 1W Clayton MO 63105 259-1686 [email protected]
Mary Ann Lawrence 2613 Potomac St. Louis MO 63118 771-3120 [email protected]
Alberta Lawson 4237 DeSoto St. Louis MO 63107 535-0572
Alberta Lawson 4237 DeSoto St. Louis MO 63107 535-0572
Maxine Lax 1819 Bacon St. Louis MO 63106 533-7407 [email protected]
Tony Lazorko & Marge Biddle P.O. Box 1056 Mesilla NM 88046
314-776-
Truc Le 3716 Fairview A St. Louis MO 63116 3063
Leahey- 314-495-
Teresa Johnson 3855 S. Taylor # 615 St. Louis MO 63122 7272
Checkerboard
Cheryl Lee Near Southside Council Square St. Louis MO 63102 982-2468 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
1445 Schulte Hill
Eliot Lee Drive St. Louis MO 63043 514-8807

Joe Leindecker 7170 Delmar St. Louis MO 63130 355-4077 [email protected]

Renee Leisure 2106 Osage St. St. Louis MO 63118 604-3061
Ward Lenz U.S. Army Corps of Regulatory Branch 1222 St. Louis MO 63103 314-331-
Engineers Spruce St. 8186

Leon- St. Louis County 121 S. Meramec

Stephanie Streeter Highways & Traffic Avenue St. Louis MO 63105 615-8119 [email protected]
Howard Leright 3808 N. Florissant St. Louis MO 63107 533-2030 [email protected]
St. Louis County 121 S. St.
Elizabeth Letscher South Sector Specialist Economic Council Meramec Suite 900 Louis MO 63123 314-615-7669
Bruce Levine 3326 Pennsylvania St. Louis MO 63118 664-8545 [email protected]
Marlene Levine 3326 Pennsylvania St. Louis MO 63118 664-8545 [email protected]
McGowan Bros Dvlpmt emily@mcgowanbrothersdevel
Emily Lewis Corp., LLC 1221 Locust St. Louis MO 63103 588-1170 opment.com
John Lewis 1038 Geyer Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 231-4210 [email protected]
Ollie Lewis 3710 Palm St. St. Louis MO 63107
Ollie Lewis 3710 Palm St. St. Louis MO 63107
St. Louis Metropolitan
Lt. Jerry Leyshock Police Department 1200 Clark St. Louis MO 63103 444-2998
Vince Licare 1801 LaSalle Street St. Louis MO 63104
Maplewoo
Karen Lightfoot PO Box 430162 d MO 63143
Dot Lindhurst 2306 Russell Blvd St. Louis MO 63104 776-3047
314-776-
Don Lindsay 2836 Accomac Street St. Louis MO 63104 0949
Donna Lindsay 1918 Destrahan St. Louis MO 63107 421-1246
E.W. Lindsey 4954 Highland St. Louis MO 63113

Rebecca Lindsey 2834-A Victor St. Louis MO 63104 210-9858 [email protected]

Richard Lipski 3511 Illinois St. Louis MO 63118 773-5227
314-552-
Tammy Littrell 6445 Vermont St. Louis MO 63111 8404
314-865-
Luis Llanos 3706 Fairview Ave. St. Louis MO 63116 1191 [email protected]
314-865-
Maria Llanos 3706 Fairview Ave. St. Louis MO 63116 1191
314-335-
Tracey Lober 501 N. Broadway St. Louis MO 63102 4219 [email protected]
314-994-
Eric Lobser 11511 Patty Ann Dr. St. Louis MO 63146 3721 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Downtown St. Louis 436-6500
Laura Lock Partnership 906 Olive St. Suite 200 St. Louis MO 63101 x232 [email protected]
Alan Loehr 1812 Lafayette St. Louis MO 63104 664-6554
Tim Logan 3507 Holliday St. Louis MO 63118 [email protected]
Nick LoGrasso 7120 Virgina St. Louis MO 63111 [email protected]
George Lomack 5128 St. Louis Ave St. Louis MO 63115 383-7773
Wayne &
Joan Long 1804 S. 9th St. St. Louis MO 63104 267-4380 [email protected]
Angelo &
Stella Longoni 5544 Shaw Ave. St. Louis MO 63110
Esperanza Lopez 3624 Hydraulic St. Louis MO 63116
Mary Lopinot 3917 Fillmore St. Louis MO 63116 832-6100 [email protected]
Tim Lorson Mardi Gras Inc 1013 Ann Ave St. Louis MO 63104
314-522-
Faye Love 8608 Jo Court St. Louis MO 63134 2394
Paula Loveland 6141 Colorado St. Louis MO 63111 352-3659
Brandon Lower 403 Kayser St. Louis MO 63125 420-2968
Quinton Lucas 4515 Olive St. Louis MO 63106
Michael &
Kathleen Luck 1712 S. 10th St. St. Louis MO 63104 421-1712
Laura Ludwig 3710 French Ave. St. Louis MO 63116 503-1186 [email protected]
Mr. & Mrs. Luepker 4828 S. Broadway St. Louis MO 63111 353-4828

Norma Lumpford 4244 W. Ashland Ave. St. Louis MO 63115 289-9940 [email protected]
314-865-
Quyen Ly 3818 Chippewa St. Louis MO 63116 0781
Judy Lydon 8456 Edna St. Louis MO 63147 261-5714
Ellen Lyng 322 N. Newstead St. Louis MO 63108 898-3540
Michael Lynskey 4049 Russell St. Louis MO 63110
International Building 231-2489 x
Amy Maberry Corp., LLC 701 N. 15th St. Louis MO 63103 113 [email protected]
Hussein Mada 3509 Cherokee St. Louis MO 63118
[email protected]
Richey Madison 7711 Bonhomme Suite 100 St. Louis MO 63105 725-2927 om
Jim Magnus 6563 Oleatha St. Louis MO 63139 647-8629
Haji Mahamed 3750 Minnesota St. Louis MO 63118
Irene Malinoski 4351 Itaska St. Louis MO 63116 832-9181
Azevad Malkic 4816 Germonia St. St. Louis MO 63116
Matt Mancini 3912 Federer St. Louis MO 63116 752-9011
Thomas Mangogna 2402 Menard Apt. A St. Louis MO 63104 664-9326 [email protected]
Gus Mantia 4120 Parker St. Louis MO 63116 664-0606

Barbara Manzara 3202 N. 19th St. St. Louis MO 63107 238-4032 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
PO Box
One Ameren Plaza, 66149, MC
Richard Mark Ameren UE 1901 Chouteau Ave. 820 St. Louis MO 63166 554-2547 [email protected]
Herb Marlawort 9 Radnor Rd. St. Louis MO 63131 [email protected]
Ivan Martin 4135 Flad Ave. St. Louis MO 63110 664-6472 [email protected]
Ralph Martinez 4471 Arco St. Louis Mo 63110 533-6704 [email protected]
Mary
Robert Davison-
Officer & Officer 2359 S. 12th St. St. Louis MO 63104 772-2849
Norman Marzorati 2910 Dalton St. Louis MO 63139
Missouri Housing
Development Kansas
Dave Maslen Commission 3435 Broadway City MO 64111
Laclede's Landing 710 North Second Suite 200
Dawne Massey Merchants Association Street South St. Louis MO 63102 241-5875
Toad & toad.matsler@anheuser-
Karen Matsler 2628 S. 13th St. St. Louis MO 63118 776-1323 busch.com
Edgar Mauarrle 3624 Hydraulic St. Louis MO 63116
2513 Minnesota 314-750-
Lauren Maul Avenue St. Louis MO 63104 4489 [email protected]
7711 Bonhomme Ave. 314-678-
Ramsey Maune Maune Properties Ste. 310 St. Louis MO 63105 4888 [email protected]
314-385-
Perez Maxwell 1458 Rowan, Apt. A St. Louis MO 63112 8397 [email protected]
4746 McPhearson
Ron Mayberry Rothschild Realty Co. Ave. St. Louis MO 63108 421-1143 [email protected]
Molly McBride 2750 Russell Blvd St. Louis MO 63104 762-9898 [email protected]
Robert McBride 4209 DeSoto Ave. St. Louis MO 63107 533-1203
Hattie McCain 4877 Calvin Ave. St. Louis MO 63115 382-4333
John McCain 8633 Park Lane St. Louis MO 63147 385-6416

Brian McCalpin 8620 Florence Ave. Brentwood MO 63144 918-0769

Integrity Real Estate
Julie McCann Corp. 400 N 4th St. St. Louis MO 63102 231-9117 [email protected]
Larry McCarthy 3546 Halliday Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 664-3336
314-954-
Robert McCaskill 974 Morena ct. Ballwin MO 63011 3297 [email protected]
Rose McClarren 1112 Bellerive St. Louis MO 63111 352-2544 [email protected]
Grand South Grand
Local Development
Dave McCreery Corp. 3109 South Grand St. Louis MO 63118 772-4640
Bessie McDonald 3916 Pemase St. St. Louis MO 63107 533-7936
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
314-454-
Felix McDonald 1362 Semple St. Louis MO 63112 1984
Alloine McFall 1925 Berra Ct. St. Louis MO 63110 781-8472
McGowan/Walsh 314-422- info@mcgowanbrothersdevelop
Kevin McGowan Historic Renovations 1221 Locust Suite 1200 St. Louis MO 63103 1798 ment.com
McGowan Bros Dvlpmt seames@mcgowanbrothersdev
Seames McGowan Corp., LLC 1221 Locust St. Louis MO 63103 324-7326 elopment.com
McGowan Bros Dvlpmt sean@mcgowanbrothersdevelo
Sean McGowan Corp., LLC 1221 Locust St. Louis MO 63103 323-7326 pment.com
McGowan Bros Dvlpmt 1324 Washington tim@mcgowanbrothersdevelop
Tim McGowan Corp., LLC Ave. Suite 630 St. Louis MO 63103 503-5028 ment.com
Regina McGrew 3317 Oregon St. Louis MO 63118 605-5986
6185 Westminister
Dan McGuire Place St. Louis Mo 63112 862-7470 [email protected]
McGuire Moving & 1333 North Sixth
Dan McGuire Storage Street St. Louis MO 63106 241-0600
8764
Senator Russ Mancheste St.
James McHugh Carnahan r Road Suite 203 Louis MO 63144 (314) 962-1523
Kris McKay Lipton Group, LLC 4497 Pershing St. Louis MO 63108 629-6213 [email protected]
1001 Boardwalk 314-432-
Chris McKee McEagle Development Springs Pl. O'Fallon MO 63366 4320
Pat McKindley 4261 Connecticut St. Louis MO 63116 776-7478
Carolyn McKinnie 3456 Texas St. Louis MO 63118 773-8104
Rita McKlotti 2003 Lilly Ave. St. Louis MO 63110
Bradley McMahon Federal Highway 209 Adams Street Jefferson MO 65101 573-638-
Administration City 2608
Garry McMichael 1926 Allen St. Louis MO 63104 773-4112 [email protected]
Alderman St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
Michael McMillan Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
Reginald McMurtry 4538 Natural Bridge St. Louis MO 63115 261-3914
Alanna McNelly 6632 Idaho St. Louis MO 63111 398-4863 [email protected]
STL Housing Authority &
Sandi McRath McCormack Baron 4100 Lindell St. Louis MO 63108 531-4770 [email protected]

Willie Meadows 4046 Botanical Ave. St. Louis MO 63110 776-4050 [email protected]

Mike Meagher 1116 Bellerive Blvd. St. Louis MO 63111 481-3412 [email protected]
cipriano.medina@thelawrenceg
Cipriano Medina 2111 Withall Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 roup.com
Megan Meehan 3316 Illinois Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 771-0277
Mefford- 982-
Jessica Miller Metro/St. Louis St. Louis MO 1400x1630 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Gedhu Melafera 3664 Arsenal St. Louis MO 63110
1200
Market
St. Louis Board of Street -
Marjorie Melton, P.E. Public Service City Hall Room 305 St. Louis MO 63103 622-4143 [email protected]
1287 Garden Circle 314-894-
Susan Menhard Dr. #D St. Louis MO 63125 0074 [email protected]
Eric Meredith 2117 Stansbury St. Louis MO 63118 599-2625
Eric Merle & Robin Smith 2023 S. 8th St. Apt. A St. Louis MO 63104 558-1321 [email protected]
Janet Merlo 5541 Daggett St. Louis MO 63111 664-3424
Pat Merlo 5426 Daggett St. Louis MO 63110 776-7358
Pat Merlo 5426 Daggett Ave. St. Louis MO 63110
Rita Merlotti 2003 Lilly Ave. St. Louis MO 63110
Merriweathe alexismerriweather@sbcglobal.
Alexis r 4032 Cora Ave. St. Louis MO 63115 382-5684 net
314-776-
Gedlu Metafene 3664 Arsenal St. Louis MO 63116 8885
Steve Metherd The HRI Group, Inc. 1007 Olive Street 3rd Floor St. Louis MO 63101 436-8161
314-752-
Ruth Ann Meuser 4824 Penn St. Louis MO 63111 8953 [email protected]
John Meyer 3737 Texas Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 776-7264
314-531-
Ruth Meyer 4304 Manchester St. Louis MO 63110 7023 [email protected]
Valerie Meyer Gate District 1701 S. Jefferson St. Louis MO 63104 771-7040 [email protected]

Jo Meyerkord 4142 Castleman Ave. St. Louis MO 63110 565-6939 [email protected]

Rich Meyers 12987 Pingry Place St. Louis MO 63131 965-6475 [email protected]
Pat & Joe Miano 3936 Fairview St. Louis MO 63116
314-448-
Gre Michaud 3420 Grace Ave. St. Louis MO 63116 7274 [email protected]
636-225-
Mel Millenbrook 1702 Purity Court St. Louis MO 63026 8950
636-225-
Mel Millenbruck 1702 Purity Ct. St. Louis MO 63026 8980 [email protected]
Dan Miller Gate District 3039 Eads Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 772-8334 [email protected]
Edward Miller 7708 Sunray St. Louis MO 63123 843-3706 [email protected]
Genell Miller 2300 S. 11th St. St. Louis MO 63104 322-0057
McGowan-Walsh
Jessie Miller Historic Renovators 1221 Locust St. Louis MO 63103 374-2277 [email protected]
Penny Miller 4048 Flora Place St. Louis MO 63110
Jimmie Miller, JR City Hall Room 418 St. Louis MO 63103 613-7149 [email protected]
Dolan Miriam 5508 Botanical St. Louis MO 63110 645-7781
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
314-645-
Edward Miriani 5508 Botanical St. Louis MO 63110 7781
Leo V. Sterling Lacquer
(John) Mitchell Manufactring Co. 3150 Brannon St. Louis MO 63139 231-3713 NO
314-429-
Don Mjo 1911 Elape Ct. St. Louis MO 63114 7459
John &
Sally Moehle 2501 S. 12th St. St. Louis MO 63104 771-9833 [email protected]
Brenda Mohr 808 Ann St. Louis MO 63104 283-6386 [email protected]
618-628-
Sarah Moll 3785 S. Harbor Way Belleville IL 62221 1631 [email protected]
[email protected]
Debbie Monalo 5200 Wilson St. Louis MO 63110 773-7700 om
Karen Mondale 2211 S. 11th St. St. Louis MO 63104 776-4201 [email protected]

Don Monshausen 2846 Shenandoah St. Louis MO 63104 779-4401 [email protected]

Jacob Development 1232 Washington 314-621-
John Monshausen Group Ave. Suite 210 St. Louis MO 63103 2266 x 102
314-249-
Benito Montez 2716 S. 13th St. St. Louis MO 63118 4022

David Montgomery 7214 Dale St. Louis MO 63117 [email protected]

St. Louis Convention 1 Metropolitan
Carole Moody and Visitor's Bureau Square Suite 1100 St. Louis MO 63102 992-0604
Walter Moody 1929 Hickory St. Louis MO 63104 [email protected]
Chippewa/Broadway
Betty Moore Business Assoc. 2831 Chippewa St. Louis MO 63118 771-5212
Betty Moore 3830 S. Broadway St. Louis MO 63118 771-5212 [email protected]
David Moore 5500 W. Park Ave St. Louis Mo 63110 633-3336 [email protected]
Edna Moore 4507 Mary Ave. St. Louis MO 63107 531-3465
Louis W. Moore Hadley Association 1217 Hadley St. Louis MO 63106 436-2442 NO
Patrick Moore 3526 A. Magnolia St. Louis MO 63118 664-4776
314-229-
Ronald Moore 1549 Knollstone Ferguson MO 63135 3713 [email protected]

1204 Washington 754-5617 or smoore@kwamebuildinggroup.

Sadie Moore Kwame Building Group Avenue St. Louis MO 63103 862-5344 com
Sylvia Moore 6050 Goodfellow St. Louis MO 63147 385-0670
314-448-
Arelis Moran 3500 Arsenal St. Louis MO 63118 6539 [email protected]
Joe Morey 2416 S. 10th St. St. Louis MO 63104 [email protected]
Joseph &
Shay Morey 2416 S. 10th St. St. Louis MO 63104 664-2713
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
36 Four Seasons Chesterfiel
Mark Morley The Morley Group Center d MO 63107

Jay & Vicki Morris 824 Ann Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 771-9393 [email protected]
Marilyn Morris 2622 S. 12th St. St. Louis MO 63104 335-7951 [email protected]
Marilyn Morris 4335 Lee St. Louis MO 63115 389-1831
Shirley Morrison 5928 Arendes Dr. St. Louis MO 63116 752-0365 [email protected]
Cyndee Morton 2101 Cherokee St. Louis MO 63118 651-7410
Bob &
Karen Moske 1828 S. 10th St. St. Louis MO 63104 621-7588 [email protected]
Frank Moskus 3311 S. Jefferson St. Louis MO 63118 [email protected]
Saundra Moss 4303 Chouteau St. Louis MO 63110 531-3013 [email protected]
Sandra Moushey 4255 Louisiana St. Louis MO 63111 [email protected]
Delmar Financial Co.
Bruno Mruckovski Mortgage Bankers 8707 Gravois Road St. Louis MO 63123 583-1112
Darko & 55 Nationalway
Jasna Mruckovski Better House Realty Shopping Center St. Louis MO 63011 680-4647 [email protected]
Gerold Mueller 2820 Shenandoah St. Louis MO 63104
Lillian Mueller 2820 Shenandoah St. Louis MO 63104
Aleligne Mulat 525 Paddlewheel Florissant MO 63033
Eugene Muller 4399 Forest Park Apt. 130 St. Louis MO 63108
Tim Mulligan 3117 Lemp Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 772-9180 [email protected]
16100 Swingley Chesterfiel
Dawn Munaco Remax Properties West Ridge Rd. d MO 63107 761-3760 [email protected]
Ismet Muratovic 4144 Grasso 1A St. Louis MO 63123
7401
Rodgers Group Real Maryland St.
Julie Murphy Governmental Affairs Estate Development Ave. Louis MO 63130 314.862.7921
Richie Murphy & Julia Mittelstadt P.O. Box 12207 St. Louis MO 63104 241-8888 [email protected]
Al Murray 419 Medina St. Louis MO 63122 965-9996 [email protected]
Dyemal Mustie 9983 Casarosa St. Louis MO 63123
12271 Springs
Delfina Myers Shadow St. Louis MO 63043
Sarfraz Nabi 2700 S. Grand St. Louis MO 63118 773-0085
Chesterfiel 636-530-
Ted Naegel 2201 Joyceridge Ct. d MO 63107 1794 [email protected]
Marsha Nash 3809 Indiana St. Louis MO 63118 771-6199
Roosevelt Nelson 3609 Paris Ave. St. Louis MO 63115 261-8452
Judy Nesbit 1213 Sidney St. St. Louis MO 63104 772-3278 [email protected]
[email protected]
Jennifer Nettemeyer 1852 Missouri Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 348-4144 m
314-291-
David Neubauer 1569 Ville Angela Ln St. Louis MO 63042 3928 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
314-436-
Gary Neuhaus 1828 S. 9th St. St. Louis MO 63104 7572 [email protected]
Gary &
Janet Neuhaus 1823 S. 9th St. St. Louis MO 63104 436-7572 [email protected]
Don Neumann Federal Highway 209 Adams Street Jefferson MO 65101 573-636-
Administration City 7104
Khon Ngu 1911 Clare St. Louis MO 63114
314-772-
Anh Nguyen 3659 McDonald St. Louis MO 63116 3288
314-771-
Lieu Nguyen 383 Chippewa St.Louis MO 63116 6816
Minn Nguyen 4006 Gravois St. Louis MO 63116
Tenis Nguyen 701 Westgate St. Louis MO 63120
314-772-
Thanh Nguyen 4351 Potomac St. St. Louis MO 63116 7552
314-457-
Trinh Nguyen 5423 Dewey St. Louis MO 63116 0680
314-865-
Tuan Nguyen 4003 Dunnica Ave. St. Louis MO 63116 1524
Ernestine Nixon 4471 Lee Avenue St. Louis MO 63115 385-8526
314-772-
Janice Noecker 3942 Shenandoah St. Louis MO 63110 1201
Stephanie Noecker Arch City Chronicle 3942 Shenandoah St. Louis MO 63110 537-7404 [email protected]
Jim Nordmann 5143 Pattison Ave. St. Louis MO 63110
3522 Shenandoah
Steven Northrop Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 776-7925

Neil & Tish Norton 2350 Menard St. St. Louis MO 63104 865-2074 [email protected]
Nancy Novak 38 Crestwood Dr. Clayton MO 63105

Claire Novak-Boyd 1312 Sullivan St. Louis MO 63107 621-8016 [email protected]

Hampton-Chippea
Business Association,
Noreen Nutt C/O Comstat Payroll 5840 Macklind ave. St. Louis MO 63109 351-7090 [email protected]
Mike &
Donna Oakes 1814 S. 8th St. St. Louis MO 63104 255-2273 [email protected]
Keri O'Brien 2747 Russell Blvd St. Louis MO 63104 [email protected]
Tino Ochoa 1412 Sullivan Ave St. Louis MO 63107 621-0749 [email protected]
Colleen O'Conner 1924 Pestalozzi St. Louis MO 63118
Missouri Department of Chesterfiel [email protected].
Jeanne Olubogun Transportation 1590 Woodlake Drive d MO 63017 340-4550 gov
Annie O'Neal 4875 Calvin St. Louis MO 63115 383-4399
Charles O'Neal 5317 Vernon St. Louis MO 63112
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Richard Ontiveros 14471 Bantry #14 St. Louis MO 63017
Chesterfiel 636-394-
Richard Ontiveros PO Box 6192 d MO 63006 7706
314-646-
John Openlander 7601 Manchester rd. St. Louis MO 63143 3640
Wise Ora 3219 Indiana Street St. Louis MO 63118
Marian Orangeline 1917 Hebert St. Louis MO 63107 241-0749
Gale Ormiston 2117 Utah St. St. Louis MO 63118 772-7082
314-351-
Pedro Orozco 7516 Knacksted Ct. St.Louis MO 63116 2598
Alderman St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
Kenneth Ortmann Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103 776-0161
Ken Ortmann 1908-A Arsenal St. Louis MO 63104 776-0161
The Regional Business
Kathleen Osborn Council 7701 Forsyth Blvd. Suite 205 St. Louis MO 63105 225-2101 [email protected]

Victoria Osborne 5876 Sunshine Drive St. Louis MO 63109 [email protected]

5600 S. Compton 314-351-
Dr. Ken Osin Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 6308
Kevin Ottomeyer 2852 Victor St. Louis MO 63104
Don Owens 2320 Park Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 600-7799 [email protected]
Ella Owens 339 N Hills Dr St. Louis MO 63121 382-8836 [email protected]
314-421-
Ella Owens 2501 N. 11th Street St. Louis MO 63106 5288
314-231-
Johnnie Owens 1508 Hebert St. Louis MO 63107 0928
Padmanabh
Murugan an P.O. Box 32822 St. Louis MO 63132 393-6266
Jack Painter P.O. Box 50118 Clayton MO 63105
314-588-
Linda Pallmann 2011 Park Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 7625 [email protected]
314-368-
Georgia Palmer 6134 Virginia Ave. #5 St. Louis MO 63111 3261 [email protected]

Willie Palmer 5201 N. Norwood Dr. St. Louis MO 63115 381-3493

John Palos 3739 Wisconsin St. Louis MO 63118 771-8485 [email protected]
314-647-
Sharon Panian 7044 Mardel Ave St. Louis MO 63109 7160 [email protected]
St. Louis Clergy
Coalition / Community 12105 Old Halls Ferry
Rev. Doug Parham Church of God Road Florissant MO 63033
314-605-
Craig Parker 5617 Goodfellow St. Louis MO 63136 0405
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
3115 South Grand
Jeanne Parker City Property Company Ave. Suite 214 St. Louis MO 63118 773-4141 [email protected]
Jesse Parker 4860 Anderson St. Louis MO 63115 389-0293
314-753-
ken Parker 3514 S. Jefferson St. Louis MO 63118 6414 [email protected]
314-355-
Larry Parker 1574 Delcastle Drive Florrisant MO 63034 1693 [email protected]
4550 Montogmery Suite 800 301-634-
Rhae Parkes Abt Associates Avenue North Bethesda MD 20814 1765 [email protected]
Mona Parsley & Sandy Shubert 2418 S. 13th St. St. Louis MO 63104 776-7728 [email protected]

Mona Parsley 2418 S. 13th St. Louis MO 63104 776-7728 [email protected]

Amelia Pate 5093 Ruskin St. Louis MO 63115 382-5122
Bob Patrich 700 Bellerive St. Louis MO 63111 832-1955
Glenn Patterson 4001 Russell Blvd. St. Louis MO 63110 367-9021

Steve Patterson 3101 Mount Pleasant St. Louis MO 63111 479-5023 [email protected]
Steven Patterson Schaller Realty 7419 S. Broadway St. Louis MO 63111 479-5023 [email protected]
314-261-
Earline Patton 4729 Ashland Ct. St. Louis MO 63115 0595
Mary Patton 4115 Miami St. Louis MO 63116
Al Patz 3855 S. Taylor St. Louis MO 63122
Thomas Payton 5975 Laurette St. Louis MO 63135
Dolores Pecaut 3910 Potomac St. Louis MO 63116
John Pendegast 2007 Sidney St. Louis MO 63104 773-0115
Mary Lisa Penilla 3505 Connecticut St. Louis MO 63118 [email protected]
Derrick Perkins 4200 Canal Dr. St. Louis MO 63034 355-0572
Thomas Perl 4035 Parker St. Louis MO 63116 772-2403 [email protected]
Tom Perl 4035 Parker Ave. St. Louis MO 63116 772-2403 [email protected]
314-342-
Dominic Perniciaro 1216 Fernleaf Dr. St. Louis MO 63126 0563 [email protected]

Jeff & Amy Perot 2109 Menard St. St. Louis MO 63104 865-2683 [email protected]
4204 Shenandoah
Brandon Perry Ave. St. Louis MO 63110 664-4849 [email protected]
Ron Perry 2201 A S. 11th St. St. Louis MO 63104 280-3064 [email protected]
Daniela Petkova 4159 Laclede Ave. Rear St. Louis MO 63108
Brian Peura 3420 Halliday Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 [email protected]
Gary Pey 4233 Connecticut St. Louis MO 63116 771-7701
H 361-6969
Federation of Block Cell:
Vincent Phillips Units Board of Directors 5439 Vernon 63112 St. Louis MO 63112 5753943
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
DeSales Community
Thomas Pickel Housing Corporation 2759 Russell St. Louis MO 63104 776-5444 [email protected]
U.S. Department of 1222
Housing & Urban Spruce
Roy Pierce Development Multifamily Housing Street St. Louis MO 63103 539-6560
221 North Grand
Peter Pierotti Saint Louis University Blvd. St. Louis MO 63103 977-8173 [email protected]
U.S. Congressman
Darryl Piggott William Clay's Office 625 N. Euclid Suite 200 St. Louis MO 63108 367-1970
Kathryn Pisoni 3855 Flora St. Louis MO 63110 664-8884
Nicholas &
Kathryn Pisoni 3835 Flora Palce St. Louis MO 63110 413-4936
314-481-
Mary Lou Pleimann 6434 Alabama St. Louis MO 63111 9684
Todd Plesko 331 Bass Drive Troy IL 62294 982-1479 [email protected]
Liz Pointer 2903 Salena #2 St. Louis MO 63118
Bill Pollock 3616 Upton Street St. Louis MO 63116 [email protected]
Bruce Ponman 2710 Virginia Ave. St. Louis MO 63118
Lee Porter 4828 Penn St. Louis MO 63111
William Porter 4553 A Fair St. Louis MO 63115 922-6902 [email protected]
John Posey 5572 Waterman St. Louis MO 63112 454-1954
314-781-
Dale Poss 6040 Marmaduke St. Louis MO 63139 7505
Matt Potter 1313 Missouri St. Louis MO 63104 664-3528 [email protected]

Barb Potts 4965 Columbia Ave. St. Louis MO 63139 664-3416 [email protected]
314-772-
Mario Pozzo 5535 Daggett St. Louis MO 63110 8160
Mario Sr. Pozzo 5535 Daggett St. Louis MO 63110 772-8160
Daniel Prater 2220 S. 12th St. St. Louis MO 63104 664-8020
Ruth Pratt 4345 Itaska St. Louis MO 63116 481-5161

Stirling Presson Pyramid Contruction Co. 906 Olive St. St. Louis MO 63101 446-2900 [email protected]

Ray Preston 2649 Chouteau Ave. St. Louis MO 63103 960-3430

Jim & Julie Price 919 Allen St. Louis MO 63104 621-1928 [email protected]
4216 W. Lexington
Paul Price Ave. St. Louis MO 63115 533-0212
Lou Priesten 1907 Sullivan St. Louis MO 63107
Robert Priesten 1927 Sullivan St. Louis MO 63107 973-2988
Celeste Primeau 4029 Miami St. St. Louis MO 63116
Linda Primer 3rd Ward 2139 East Fair St. Louis MO 63107
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007

Jacob Development 1232 Washington 604-8565 or kendra@jacobdevelopmentgro

Kendra Profit Group Ave. Suite 2100 St. Louis MO 63103 621-2226 up.com

Carol Prombo 6719 Bradley St. Louis MO 63139 314-64-4182

3821 Westminister
Adolphus Pruitt Place St. Louis MO 63108 534-2842 [email protected]
Hazelwoo 314-395-
Marjorie Pulley 315 Chez Paree d MO 63042 9165
Michael Pusateri 3314 Russell St. Louis MO 63104

Janice and
Michael Quinn 4409 Gravois St. Louis MO 63116 457-0781
Zelma Quinn 3861 Ashland St. Louis MO 63107 535-8048
314-353-
Luz Maria Quiroz 4500 Louisiana St. Louis MO 63111 7664
618-806-
Keri Radar 332 Southgate Dr. Apt. 3 Freeburg IL 62243 2147 [email protected]
European Lutherie
Sasha Radicic School 5216 Chippewa St. Louis MO 63109 832-4515 [email protected]
Michael Radmer 2922 McNair Ave St. Louis MO 63118
McCormack Baron
Reagon Management alan.ragan@mccormackbaron.
Alan Ragan Services, Inc 1415 Olive Street Suite 310 St. Louis MO 63103 421-1160 com
Joyce Rainey 2224 Alberta St. St. Louis MO 63118 865-5014
Rainey-
Carrie Boone 2220 Alberta St. St. Louis MO 63118 769-9772
314-600-
Natasha Ramey 1323 Hebert St. Louis MO 63107 7896 [email protected]
314-600-
Natasha Ramey 1323 Hebert St. St. Louis MO 63107 7896 [email protected]
Missouri Housing
Development Kansas
Pete Ramsel Commission 3435 Broadway City MO 64111
Dave Ramsey 3157 Sublette St. Louis MO 63139 941-0620 [email protected]
South County 6204
Chamber of Treeridge St.
Scott Ramshaw Commerce Trl Louis MO 63129 (314)846-8526
Margaret Randazzo 5223 Shaw St. Louis MO 63110 776-7466
Tony Range 1842 S. 8th St. St. Louis MO 63104 621-7549 [email protected]

Rankins- Tucker & rankins-

Jo Ann Cannon Office of the Mayor 418 City Hall Market Sts. St. Louis MO 63103 613-7165 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Doug Rasmussen 1412 Herbert St. St. Louis MO 63107 621-1961 [email protected]
Al Ratz 385 South Taylor Apt. 512 St. Louis MO 63122
314-678-
Ruth Raupp 6400 Minnesota St. Louis MO 63111 0414 [email protected]
Melvin Raymond 5429 Vernon Ave St. Louis MO 63112 361-7020 [email protected]
Don Re 3157 Sublette St. Louis MO 63139 [email protected]
Danielle Reamey 2905 Texas St. Louis MO 63118 773-2471
Washingto 202-585-
Michael Reardon Nixon Peabody 401 9th Street NW Suite 900 n D.C. 20004 8000 [email protected]
Angela Redmond 3943 Pennsylvania St. Louis MO 63118 865-0968
314-353-
Debbie Redmond Carondelet YMCA 600 Loughborough St. Louis MO 63111 0439 [email protected]
Jean Redmond 3943 Pennsylvania St. Louis MO 63118 865-0968
Alderman St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
Lewis F. Reed Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
Gerard Reed 3456 Winnebago St. Louis MO 63118 664-3135
James &
Valerie Reed 2139 Allen Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 865-0425 [email protected]
Mark Reed 2052 Russell St. Louis MO 63104 773-7876
Mark Reed 2052 Russell St. Louis MO 63104 773-7878
Frank Reedy One Memorial Dr. Suite 550 St. Louis MO 63102 231-32 [email protected]
314-401-
Travis Reems 3120 Providence Pl. St. Louis MO 63111 9122 [email protected]

W. Thomas Reeves Downtown Now! 906 Olive St. #225 St. Louis MO 63101 588-0458 [email protected]
Frances Regalia 5665 Bischoff St. Louis MO 63110
314-762-
Kathy Reichbach 2219 Cuggiono St. Louis MO 63110 9481
Ted Reinhart 530 Ridge Ave. St. Louis MO 63119
Lisa Remach 61 York Dr. St. Louis MO 63144 421-0400
Rendon-
Zoila Ochoa 1411 Sullivan Ave St. Louis MO 63107 [email protected]
City Hall -
Luke Reven 1200 Market St. Room 418 St. Louis MO 63103 589-8166 [email protected]
Juanita Rice 4173 Russell Blvd. St. Louis MO 63110 772-2234
Marik Rice 3546 Callfornia St. Louis MO 63118 776-2197
Mark Rice 3546 California St. Louis MO 63118
5464 N.
Clarence Richard Kingshighway St. Louis MO 63115
John Richardson 4208 Linton St. Louis MO 63107 533-2223
Patrick Richmond 531 N. Crescent Kirkwood MO
James Rick & Jackie Torno 2212 S. 9th St. St. Louis MO 63104 772-0202 [email protected]
Linda Rider 3933 Pennsylvania St. Louis MO 63118 664-3457
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
618-222-
Rina Ridgway 3305 Denvershire Dr. Belleville IL 62221 1407 [email protected]
Sonia Riggs 3501-A Louisiana St. Louis MO 63118
Tom Riggs 5605 Delor Street St. Louis MO 63109 481-2296 [email protected]
Kim Riley 3310 Bell Ave. St. Louis MO 63106 334-0247
982-1400
Christopher Rimsky Metro 707 North First St. St. Louis MO 63102 x1880 [email protected]
Maricruz Rivera 5342 Neosho St. St. Louis MO 63109
Ethel Rizzo 2104 Osage St. St. Louis MO 63118 457-9457
William Rizzo 2118 Osage St. St. Louis MO 63118 752-1914
John Roach 721 Olive St. Suite 111 St. Louis MO 63101 621-0800
Austin Roberds 2905 Magnolia St. Louis MO 63118 504-8628 [email protected]
Forest Park Southeast
Development
Jackie Roberson Corporation 4471 Arco St. Louis MO 63110 533-6704 [email protected]
618-257-
Chris Roberts 427 S. 47th St. Belleville IL 62226 8562 croberts2charter.net

John Roberts Civic Progress 800 Market Street Suite 1800 St. Louis MO 63101 862-7427 [email protected]
Roberts Brothers 1408 North 314-256-
Steve Roberts Properties, LLC Kingshighway St. Louis MO 63113 4643
314-776-
Charlie Robin 3829 Russell Blvd St. Louis MO 63110 8777 [email protected]
Jefferson 573-526-
Bill Robinett Modoi-MO City MO 65109 1308 [email protected]
1445-47 North 9th
Djuan Robinson Street St. Louis MO 63106
436-2351 x jennifer.robinson@mccormackb
Jennifer Robinson McCormack Baron 1415 Olive St. St. Louis MO 63103 26 aron.com
Alderman St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
Joseph D. Roddy Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
Ed Rode 3405 Bent St. Louis MO 63116 [email protected]
Lupe Rodriguez 4637 Wilcox Ave St. Louis MO 63116
Urban Design and 622-
Don Roe Planning 1015 Locust Street Suite 1200 St. Louis MO 63101 3400x252
6111 Simpson 314-781-
Linda Roe Terrace St. Louis MO 63139 5857
James Roecke 4415 Bingham St. Louis MO 63116

Roelke (Row-Benton Park West 865-1020 / Father: [email protected] or

Joseph key) Housing Corporation 3014 Oregon St. Louis MO 63118 577-6300 Joann: [email protected]
Blue Brick Renovation & 314.772.364
Bradley Roell Construction, LLC 3434 Pestalozzi St. St. Louis MO 63118 4 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
314-776-
Gary Roller 2608 Iowa St. Louis MO 63118 3348
Geri Romes 4162 Russell Blvd. St. Louis MO 63110 771-7081
Maryann Rose 3822 S. Broadway St. Louis MO 63118
Maryann Rose 3822 S. Broadway St. Louis MO 63118 773-8101
Monica Rose 3824 S. Broadway St. Louis MO 63118
James Roseberry 2232 Nebraska St. Louis MO 63101 771-8806 [email protected]
30 Plaza Square 314-436-
Rick Rosen #304 St. Louis MO 63103 9155
Dan Rositano 5434 Wilson Ave. St. Louis MO 63110 [email protected]
314-577-
Chiffontael Ross 3921 Shenandoah St. Louis MO 63110 6974 [email protected]
314-481-
Jim Ross 4068 Toenges St. Louis MO 63116 7677 [email protected]
314-941-
Ron Ross 5918 Minnesota Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 5933
Robert Rossfeld 2628 Virginia Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 229-2454 [email protected]

Maureen Ross-Lang 3250 California Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 [email protected]

Tom Roth 3815 Holly Hills St. Louis MO 63116 752-4327 [email protected]
Benton Park
Neighborhood 664-1896 /
Chris Rowley Association 2911 Salena St. Louis MO 63118 286-2840 [email protected]
314-664-
Chris Rowley 2130 Victor St. St. Louis MO 63104 1896
Lillian Circle
Neighborhood
Curtis Royston III Development 5019 Alcott St. Louis MO 63120 261-8282
John Rozah 4931 Pershing Pl. St. Louis MO 63108 [email protected]
Joseph Rucievczyk 5045 Cote Brilliante St. Louis MO 63113
Joseph Rucker 1936 N. Hanley Rd. St. Louis MO 63114 721-5536
Sherry Ruebusch 1230 Russell Blvd. St. Louis MO 63104 719-7570 [email protected]
Will Rueter 2901 Wisconsin St. Louis MO 63118 664-2492 [email protected]
Willie Ruie 4542 Natural Bridge St. Louis MO 63115 383-6681
Wallace Rule 4542 Natural Bridge St. Louis MO 63115 383-6681
City of Saint Louis
Stephen Runde, P.E. Department of Streets 1900 Hampton Ave. St. Louis MO 63139 647-3111 [email protected]
Peggy Rustige 10201 Lookaway Dr St. Louis MO 63137 869-2134
Ray Rustige 10201 Lookaway Dr St. Louis MO 63137 869-2134
St. Louis Assoc. of
Community
Gina Ryan Organization 3325 Olive St. Louis MO 63103 533-9104
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
314-727-
3386 or 776-
Norah Ryan Tower Grove East 3504 A Juniata St. St. Louis MO 63118 8432 [email protected]
314-773-
Ann Rynearson 273 Greenbrier St. Louis MO 63122 9090 [email protected]
314-652-
Diana Sain 2927 Natural Bridge St. Louis MO 63107 7959
314-982-
Larry Salci Metro 707 North First Street St. Louis MO 63102 1588 [email protected]
Ahmet Salmovic 8122 South Park Ct. St. Louis MO 63125
314-205-
Mel Sanders 2002 Burlewood Dr. St. Louis MO 63146 1422 [email protected]
Patel Sandip 2700 S. Grand St. Louis MO 63118 773-0085
314-758-
Alicia Sanford 4709 Delmar St. Louis MO 63108 4814 [email protected]
314-727-
Timothy Sansone Sansone Group 120 S. Central Ave. Suite 500 Clayton MO 63105 6664

Cherokee Park 773-6769 or

Mark Sarich Neighborhood Assoc. 3301 Lemp St. Louis MO 63118 771-1096 [email protected]
Saunchegra
Mike w 2101 Cherokee St. Louis MO 63118 651-7410
Bill Sawalich 1213 Allen St. Louis MO 63104 621-8022 [email protected]

Bill Sawalich 1213 Allen Market Ln. St. Louis MO 63104 621-8022 [email protected]
Marie Schaffer 4604 Morganford St. Louis MO 63116
John Schene Shrine of St. Joseph 1200 N. 11th Street St. Louis MO 63101 231--9407
773-9090
Matt Schindler International Institute 3654 S. Grand Blvd. St. Louis MO 63118 x106 [email protected]
Jim Schinsky 3926 Dover place St. Louis MO 63116

Rich Schlattweiler 3700 Michigan St. Louis MO 63118 771-2500 ricksautomotive@sbcglobal

Webster
Gail Schleicher 12 Hammel Ave. Groves MO 63119 [email protected]
Chip Schless 4140 Manchester St. Louis MO 63110 369-3600 [email protected]
Schlichter, Bogard and 100 South Fourth 314-621-
Jerry Schlichter Denton Street Suite 900 St. Louis MO 63102 6115 [email protected]
Alderman St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
Craig Schmid Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
Craig Schmid 2212 Winnebago St. Louis MO 63118 771-5576
Craig Schmid 2212 Winnebago St. Louis MO 63118 771-5576
Craig Schmid 2212 Winnebago St. Louis MO 63118 771-5576 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
314-846-
Frank Schmugai 2558 Baltusrol Dr. St. Louis MO 65129 9721
25 N. Brentwood 314-994-
Mark Schnuck DESCO Group Blvd. St. Louis MO 63105 4098
shad.schoenke@momentumw
James Schoenke 709 Dover Place St. Louis MO 63111 w.com
Lisa Schone 3202 Winnebago St. Louis MO 63118 773-4905 [email protected]
St.
Art Schuermann 65 Kearney St. Louis MO 63125 314-527-8369

Christopher Schwarz 2358 S. 12th St. St. Louis MO 63104 772-3294 [email protected]
Scott-
Dana Person 4601 Pope St. Louis MO 63115 385-4343 [email protected]
4216 W. Lexington
Emmanuel Searcy Ave. St. Louis MO 63115 533-0212
314-615-
Norman Seay 3701 Grandel Square St. Louis MO 63108 3600
Bus: 615-
Federation of Block 3032 James Cool 3605 H 314-
Norman Seay Units Board of Directors Papa Bell St. Louis MO 63106 533-2635
Tom Sehr Metro 707 N. first St. Louis MO 63102 982-1596 [email protected]

Heather Seib 1405 Alice Collinsville IL 62234 [email protected]

314-982-
T. Seir 707 N. First St. Louis MO 63102 1595
Matt Sepic 4237 Botanical St. Louis MO 63110
314-352-
Linda Serafini 4662 Idaho Ave St. Louis MO 63111 8151 [email protected]
Aaron Sewall 2747 Russell Blvd St. Louis MO 63104 [email protected]

Jemal and
Carolyn Seward 6347 Plymouth Wellston MO 63133
Sexton
Mara Steele 3410 Giles St. Louis MO 63116 865-4894 [email protected]
Clark Shafer 1038 Geyer Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 231-4210 [email protected]
314-623-
Sherman Shaw 7015 Invitational Dr St. Louis MO 63129 4153 [email protected]
Peggy Shear 3619 Liermann Ave. St. Louis MO 63116 481-5996 [email protected]
Alderman St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
O.L. Shelton Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
5155 Westminister 314-807-
Reuben Shelton Place St. Louis MO 63108 2077 [email protected]
Susan Sheppard 3445 Missouri Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 776-2969 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Ahmed Sheriff 6347 Plymouth Wellston MO 63133
661 Craigwoods 314-822-
Larry Sherwin Drive Kirkwood MO 63122 9061
1712 Pensacola 314-680-
Sam Shih Drive St. Louis MO 63146 0347

Tim Shillito Pyramid Contruction Co. 906 Olive St. St. Louis MO 63101 773-7333 [email protected]
Eli Shivers 5406 Vernon St. Louis MO 63112
President St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
James Shrewsbury Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
Tom Shrout 911 Washington Suite 200 St. Louis MO 63101 231-7272 [email protected]
314-345- [email protected]
Citizens for Modern 9600 or 231-
Tom Shrout Transit 911 Washington Suite 200 St. Louis MO 63102 7272
Renni Shuter 6240 McPherson St. Louis MO 63130 [email protected]
314-863-
Renni Shuter 6240 McPherson St. Louis MO 63130 0220 [email protected]
Gary &
Kathy Siddens 1850 S. 9th St. St. Louis MO 63104 436-8839 [email protected]
Bill Siedhoff 2105 Menard St. Louis MO 63104 773-6649 [email protected]
Mike Siemens 2329 Ann 2nd Floor St. Louis MO 63104 302-9997 [email protected]
Mike Siemens 2329 Ann 2nd Floor St. Louis MO 63104 [email protected]

Christopher Sievers 2045 Geyer Ave. St. Louis MO 63104

Mia Signorino 5653 Olethea St. Louis MO 63139 [email protected]
Benton Park Housing
Mark Silver Corporation 2033 Sidney St. Louis MO 63104 771-2983 [email protected]
911 Washington
Ron Silverman HRI, Inc. Avenue St. Louis MO 63101 436-8161
Mary Simmons 2337 St. Louis Ave. St. Louis MO 63106 621-0850
Dave Simon 2316 S. 9th St. St. Louis MO 63104 486-5156

Eric Simpson 1824 S. 8th St. Rear St. Louis MO 63104 713-3411 [email protected]
315 Lemay Ferry
Irfan Sinanovic VEGA Transport LLC Road Suite 129 St. Louis MO 63125 544-2233
Mark Siorek & Bill Tomber 904 Soulard St. St. Louis MO 63104 436-0635 [email protected]
Brian Sipe 5329 Vernon Ave St. Louis MO 63112 [email protected]
720 Angenette 314-966-
Andrew Sisk Avenue Kirkwood MO 63122 7789 [email protected]
Jana Sisler 8112 Braddock St. Louis MO 63130 [email protected]
H 261-0082
Federation of Block Cell: 398-
Ernest Sisson Units Board of Directors 3342 York Ct 63115 St. Louis MO 63115 0642
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Professional Cleaning,
Dzevad Sistek LLC 3034 Union Rd. St. Louis MO 63125 487-2235
Steven Skelton 1523 S. 10th St. #106 St. Louis MO 63104 614-9284 [email protected]
2880 Championship
Karen Skidmore Blvd St. Louis MO 63129 241-6014 [email protected]
Yvonne Skinner PO Box 771025 St. Louis MO 63177
PO Box
One Ameren Plaza, 66149, MC
Barbara Skitt Ameren 1901 Chouteau Ave. 700 St. Louis MO 63166 554-2249 [email protected]
715 E. Washington 618-355-
Derek Slay St. Belleville IL 62220 7864 [email protected]
314-647-
Glen Slay Slay Industries 1441 Hampton Ave. St. Louis MO 63139 7529
Missy Slay 1031 Dolman St. St. Louis MO 63104
314-772-
Sue Slusher 4277 Chippewa St. Louis MO 63116 7469

Laurie Smit KAI 211 N. Broadway Suite 1900 St. Louis MO 63102 754-5593 [email protected]
Carolyn Smith 4540 Natural Bridge St. Louis MO 63115 383-7219
Diana Smith 3416 Humphrey St. Louis MO 63118 776-7924

Gary Smith Metro 707 North First Street St. Louis MO 63102
314-838-
Gray Smith 15718 Chaste St. St. Louis MO 63034 2378
Harry Smith 4576 Bessie Ave. St. Louis MO 63115 389-3206
Jane Smith 2800 N 14th St. Louis MO 63107 241-5031
Marion Smith 2411 McNair Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 773-3941
617-507- M_S_3995fzf@fun-email-
Mike Smith 198 Tremont St. #506 Boston MA 2116 5526 online.com
Mitch Smith 3416 Humphrey St. Louis MO 63118 776-7924
Renita Smith 2517 N. Market St. Louis MO 63106 588-8031
Richard Smith 4325 Kossuth Ave. St. Louis MO 63115 314-2034
Maryland Manor
Sharon Smith Condos. 4515 Maryland St. Louis MO 63108 367-5353 [email protected]
314-231-
Steve Smith The Lawrence Group 319 N. 4th St. Suite 222 St. Louis MO 63102 5700
314-389-
Ernest Smoot 21st Ward 4219 Athlone Ave. St. Louis MO 63115 7769 [email protected]
Matt Snelling 4027 Magandie Pl. St. Louis MO 63110 776-4212 [email protected]
Thelma Snipes 4201 John St. Louis MO 63107
Ron Snowden 2938 Foxwood Dr. St. Louis MO 63043 291-6176
Doyle Soess 2123 Victor St. St. Louis MO 63104 610-0112
Cecilia Soibel 3646 Fairview Blvd St. Louis MO 63116
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Rene Sommers & Leslie Nillissen 1869 S. 10th St. St. Louis MO 63104 436-0977 [email protected]
801 Convention
Bruce Somner America's Center Plaza St. Louis MO 63101 342-5036

John Sondag One AT&T Center Suite 4105 St. Louis MO 63101 235-2400 [email protected]

Jim Sonnemaker 2104 Waverly Place St. Louis MO 63104 [email protected]

Jim Sonnemaker 2104 Waverly Place St. Louis MO 63104 [email protected]

Sonnensche
Theresa in 4429 Bingham St. Louis MO 63116
314-588-
Peter Sortino Danforth Foundation 211 North Broadway Suite 2390 St. Louis MO 63102 1900
Jon Soucy 5028 Alexander St. St. Louis MO 63115 771-4598 [email protected]

John Sovar 5636 Old Keebler Rd Collinsville IL 62239

Richard Spangler 1450 Gregg Ave. St. Louis MO 63139 [email protected]
Nicholas & 314-353-
John Spears 6440 Vermont Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 2920 [email protected]
Daniel Spell & Carol Sikich 2106 S. 8th St. St. Louis MO 63104 771-0774
314-752-
Brian Spellecy 5408 Tholozon Ave. St. Louis MO 63109 9119 [email protected]
314 752
John Speller 4716 Clifton Avenue St. Louis MO 63109 8822 [email protected]
Lori Spieker 3217 Osage St. St. Louis MO 63118 210 5821
Adrienne Spindler 4100 Laclede #307 St. Louis MO 63108 534-4299
314-631-
Kevin Spitz 9015 Philo Ave. St. Louis MO 63123 9339
Laurie Spriestma 706A Soulard St. St. Louis MO 63104 276-9172 [email protected]

201 West
Capitol
Honorable MO House of Ave., Room Jefferson 573-751-
Neal St. Onge D-88 Representatives 411B City MO 65101 5568 [email protected]
John St. Pierre 2420 Edwards St. Louis MO 63110 323-4475
Michelle St. Sin Solon Gershman, Inc. 7 N. Bemiston St. Louis MO 63105 746-1483 [email protected]
Fran Staat 2104 Allen St. Louis MO 63104 772-3823
2127 Innerbelt
Business Center 314-429-
Michael Staenberg THF Realty, Inc Drive St. Louis MO 63114 0900
Norman & 314-352-
Renate Stallings 6003 Michigan Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 3953
Ann Stanley 926 Lami Street St. Louis MO 63104
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007

503-7717 or
Patrick Stanley Chastan Properties 7001 Kingsbury St. Louis MO 63130 503-7713 [email protected]
Planning & Urban 622-3400
Rollin Stanley Design Agency 1015 Locust St. Suite 1100 St. Louis MO 63101 x676 [email protected]
Rollin &
Ann Stanley 926 Lami St. St. Louis MO 63104 762-0711 [email protected]
c/o Lift for Life 1731 S.
Gene Starr Academy Broadway St. Louis MO 63104
314-353-
Mike Stasiak 120 Elwood St. Louis MO 63111 1808

Susan Stauder RCGA One Metropolitan Sq. Suite 1300 St. Louis MO 63102 444-1155 [email protected]
Becky Steckler 2354 S. 12th St. St. Louis MO 63104 772-5562 [email protected]
The Pyramid 314-773-
John Steffen Companies 906 Olive St. Suite 600 St. Louis MO 63101 7333
Rick Stein 3817 Wyoming St. St. Louis MO 63116 762-9646 [email protected]
Sylvia Steiner 1014 Geyer St. Louis MO 63104 436-0696
Beth Stelmach 2816 Accomac St. Louis MO 63104
Missouri Department of Chesterfiel [email protected]
Wesley Stephen Transportation 1590 Woodlake Drive d MO 63017 340-4167 v

Harry Stephenson 6050 Goodfellow St. Louis MO 63147 385-0670

East-West Gateway Gateway Tower, One 314-421-

Les Sterman Council of Governments Memorial Drive Ste 1600 St. Louis MO 63102 4220 [email protected]
Janet Sternburg Missouri Department of P.O. Box 180 Jefferson MO 65102 573-751-
Conservation City 4115
John Stevens 1529 Eton Lane St. Louis MO 63147 389-9342

Carol Stevenson 1200 Allen Market ln Apt. 116 St. Louis MO 63104 588-8213
B. Stewart 1619 S. 9th St. St. Louis MO 63104
St. Louis Housing
Marian Stewart Authority 4100 Lindell Blvd. St. Louis MO 63108 286-4269 [email protected]
Terri Stewart 5702 Southwest St. Louis MO 63139
Arch Towing And 314-727-
Tom Stillman Recovery 6400 Spencer Ave St. Louis MO 63133 2217
Tammy Stockard 1211 N. Grand St. Louis MO 63106 531-9463
First Industrial Realty 314-426-
William Stockman Trust 1129 N Warson Rd St. Louis MO 63132 2111
314-802-
Linda Stoeere 1908 Nebraska St. Louis MO 63104 8705
Charlie Stoltze 5763 Greenton Way St. Louis MO 63128 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Honorable
Rachel Storch D-64 6624 Oakland Apt. F St. Louis MO 63139

201 West
Capitol
Honorable MO House of Ave., Room Jefferson 573-751-
Rachel Storch D-64 Representatives 105I City MO 65101 1400 [email protected]
Deborah Stovall 6347 Plymouth Wellston MO 63133
Steve Strebler 2216 S. 11th St. St. Louis MO 63104 772-1160
314-773-
Tom Stremlau 5130 Bischoff St. Louis MO 63110 3560
Jeff Strohmeyer 1824 S. 10th St. St. Louis MO 63104 621-2191 [email protected]

Kathleen Strout Civic Progress 800 Market Street Suite 1800 St. Louis MO 63101 206-8523 [email protected]
3900 Washington
Wilber Stuart Blvd St. Louis MO 63108 535-3900
Michael Sullivan 3321 Michigan Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 [email protected]
314-781-
Mead Summers Hilliker Corp. 2001 S. Hanley Suite 300 St. Louis MO 63144 0001
Edwardsvi
Sara Sutterfield 821 Sherman lle IL 62025
Mary Swan 6416 Blow St. St. Louis MO 63109 351-3418 [email protected]
Michelle Swatek 911 Washington 100 St. Louis MO 63101 621-3484 [email protected]

Dale Sweet 3503 Louisiana Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 762-0296 [email protected]
Personalized Property 1037 S. Big Bend
Pat Sweet Mangmt. Co. Blvd. St. Louis MO 63117 781-0303 [email protected]
Peter Swietlicki 1445 Wright St. Louis MO 63107 [email protected]
314-436-
Szczedanik 2628 Ohio Ave St. Louis MO 63118 3486
816-679-
Les Tacke 101 Orourke Dr. #8 Platte City MO 64079 6860 [email protected]
Honorable Three City Place
Jim Talent Drive Suite 1020 St. Louis MO 63105 725-4484
Mira Tanna 2854 Arsenal Street St. Louis MO 63118 771-0961 [email protected]
314-832-
Ed & Dawn Tarrel 6326 Michigan Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 8909 [email protected]
Herbert Tate 3723 Wisconsin St. Louis MO 63118 776-3512
Carol Tavenner 3741 Virginia St. Louis MO 63118 772-2684
1610 Countrybrook 314-653-
Diane Taylor Court St. Louis MO 63138 6343
Loinell & 4204 West Lexington
Geraldine Taylor Ave. St. Louis MO 63115 534-6603
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Richard Taylor 6814 Eisele St. Louis MO 63134 824-0477 [email protected]

Chippewa Park
Mark Tettenhorst Community Association 4444 Bingham St. Louis MO 63116 351-5303
Matthew Thenhaus 2832 Victor St. St. Louis MO 63104 772-6178 [email protected]

Marcelle Theodor 2811 Keokuk St. St. Louis MO 63118 773-2345 [email protected]

Ellen Theroff Laclede Gas Company 720 Olive St. Room 1509 St. Louis MO 63101 342-0530 [email protected]
314-772-
Benjamin Thomas 2611 Alfred St. Louis MO 63110 5556
Chris Thomas 4156 Humphrrey St. Louis MO 63116 chris745252gmail.com
314-921-
Ernestine Thomas 4293 Miletus Drive St. Louis MO 63033 6827 [email protected]
Missouri Housing
Development Kansas
Hans Thomas Commission 3435 Broadway City MO 64111
Joan Thomas Gate District 1323 S. Jefferson St. Louis MO 63104 664-0193 [email protected]
Old North St. Louis
Sean Thomas Restoration Group 2800 North 14th St. Louis MO 63107 241-5031 [email protected]
Missouri Housing
Development Kansas
Janell M. Thome Commission 3435 Broadway City MO 64111

Federation of Block
Barabara Thompson Units Board of Directors 1017 Theobald 63147 St. Louis MO 63147 867-7550
[email protected]
Golden Thompson 4548 Fair Ave. St. Louis MO 63115 531-8097 m

Sonda Thompson 4465 Gibson St. Louis MO 63110 534-1709 [email protected]

421-6387 x Theresa.Thompson@mccorma
Theresa Thompson McCormack Baron 1415 Olive St. St. Louis MO 63103 24 ckbaron.com
Ralph Tidwell 4643 Penrose St. Louis MO 63115 383-2754 [email protected]
Bus: 415-
8227 H 383-
Federation of Block 2754 Cell:
Ralph Tidwell Units Board of Directors 4643 Penrose 63115 St. Louis MO 63115 393-6581
314-261-
Sarah Tillard 4452 San Francisco St. Louis MO 63115 7635

Marta Tilney 1848 S. 10th St. St. Louis MO 63104 [email protected]

Daryl Tisor Federal Railroad 901 Locust Street Kansas MO 64105
Administration City
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Billy Tomber 2311 Chesnut Street St. Louis MO 63103 [email protected]
Sweetie Tomber 2863 S. 18th St. St. Louis MO 63104 324-1771 [email protected]
Laura Tomlinson 2019 Hereford St. Louis MO 63110
314-620-
Shaun Tooley 3758 Three Oak Ln Bridgeton MO 63044 1781 [email protected]
Melissa Toon 3321 Illinois Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 773-8792
314-601-
Gary Toribio 1831 S. 8th St. St. Louis MO 63104 3831 [email protected]
314-664-
Paul Torno 5520 Shaw Ave. St. Louis MO 63110 4312
Frances Torrelt 5460 Dempsey St. Louis MO
Don Torretti 3210 Regal St. Louis MO 63139
314.496.660
Brian Tran 3916#W Arsenal St. Louis MO 63116 0 [email protected]
314.496.660
Brian Tran 3916#W Arsenal St. Louis MO 63116 0 [email protected]
Robert &
Carolyn Trees 1826 S. 8th St. St. Louis MO 63104
Victoria Trent 4438 Carter St. Louis MO 63115 385-5687
Kathy Trentham 4519 Tholozan St. Louis MO 63116 773-1599

Kacie B. Triplett 2621 Louisiana St. Louis MO 63118 650-3261 [email protected]

Allison Trombley 3523 Halliday St. Louis MO 63118
Alderman
Charles St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
Quincy Troupe Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
314-315-
Crandle Troupe 4105 Utah St. Apt. A St. Louis MO 63116 6941
Michael Tully 100 N. Tucker #110 St. Louis MO 63101 241-7600 [email protected]
Joe Turmon 5151 Ashland St. Louis MO 63115 385-4841
Eleanor Turner 4861-A Kossuth St. Louis MO 63115 383-8055
Eric Turner 1307 St. Louis Ave. St. Louis MO 63106 588-8422 [email protected]
Gwen J. Turner 8736 Riverview St. Louis MO 63147 385-4538
Keith Turner 226 Elwood St. Louis MO 63111 352-6026
Commonwealth Land
Kevin Twellman Title 7980 Clayton Road Suite 101 St. Louis MO 63117 781-1504 [email protected]
One Memorial Dr.,
Caroline Twenter Ste. 1600 St. Louis MO 63102
Darla Twitty 2804 Chippewa St. Louis MO 63118 664-4694
Linda Twitty 2801 Sidney St. St. Louis MO 63104 664-4694
Anna Tyler 4106 Clarence St. Louis MO 63115 383-5687
Candace Ulrich 2358 S. 11th St. St. Louis MO 63104 773-1593 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007

Ken Ulrich Urban Developers, LLC 30 Plaza Square St. Louis MO 63103 421-5511 [email protected]
Marge Ulrich 6639 Idaho Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 832-4243
Teresa Ulrich 6602 Idaho Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 353-7019
Lorraine Ura 2241 Keokuk St. Louis MO 63118
Lorraine Ura 2241 Keokuk St. Louis MO 63118 664-7086
McGowan-Walsh
Adhar Usher Historic Renovators 1221 Locust St. Louis MO 63103 241-1630 [email protected]
314-718-
Eric Vails 4736 Beacon St. Louis MO 63120 0992
847-226-
Phil Valko 1210 N. Market St St. Louis MO 63106 8966 [email protected]
Gena Valli 1919 Berra Ct. St. Louis MO 63110 645-1560
113 E. Woodlake 618-935-
Lori Vance Ridge Valmeyer IL 62295 0536
Dan Vancil 3508 S. Jefferson St. Louis MO 63118 771-7997
618-910-
David Varga 1202 Hampton Ct. Belleville IL 62223 1444
636-207-
Ravi Vellandra 442 Valley Manor Dr. St. Louis MO 63021 0878 [email protected]
Missouri Department of Chesterfiel [email protected]
Deanna Venker, P.E. Transportation 1590 Woodlake Drive d MO 63017 877-0118 v
Alderman St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
Matt Villa Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
201 West
Capitol
Avenue,
Honorable MO House of Room Jefferson 573-751-
Tom Villa D-108 Representatives 105B City MO 65101 0438 [email protected]
1200
City of St. Louis City Hall, Market St.
Matt Villa Alderman, Ward 11 Board of Alderman Room 230 Street Louis MO 63103
Matt Villa 3887 Holly Hills St. Louis MO 63116 633-0444 [email protected]
314-352-
Tom Villa State Representative 3847 Holly Hills St. Louis MO 63116 2084
Joan Villar 6700 Michigan Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 [email protected]
314-761-
Randy Vines 4616 Lindell Blvd #316 St. Louis MO 63108 4469 [email protected]
Alderman St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
Joseph Vollmer Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
Bob Volz 1031 Dolman St. Louis MO 63104 621-8962
Anne Voss 393 N. Euclid S 300 St. Louis MO 63108 361-7117 [email protected]
Edward Wade 2232 Keokuk St. Louis MO 63118 776-6549
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
241-3464
Hilary Wagner MERS Goodwill 1727 Locust Street St. Louis MO 63103 x375 [email protected]
Brian &
Robbyn Wahby 2914 Milton Blvd. St. Louis MO 63104 776-2456
Wahshingto
Maurice n 724 North Union Suite 301 St. Louis MO 63108

Mary Walbridge 4014 Magnolia Place St. Louis MO 63110 865-3023

Anthony Walker City Hall 1200 Market Street Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103 622-4273
Ronald Walker 400 N. 4th 86 Apt. 1704 St.Louis MO 63102 [email protected]
Erin Wallace 2141 California St. Louis MO 63104
Eugene Wallace P.O.Box 4633 St. Louis MO 63108
Marybeth &
Terry Wallace 2110 S. 9th St. Rear St. Louis MO 63104 771-5483 [email protected]
Verneice Walley 5947 Emma Ave. St. Louis MO 63136 389-3269
John Waluska 7108 Whaley Place St. Louis MO 63116
Kelly Ward 2741 Chippewa St. Louis MO 63118 802-7835 [email protected]
Michael Ward 2718 Russell Blvd St. Louis MO 63104

Eula Washington 3508 Juniata St. Louis MO 63118 772-6372

Ron Watermon St. Louis Cardinals 100 S 4th Street Suite 1200 St. Louis MO 63102 345-9464 [email protected]
Bob Watson 2124 Victor St. Louis MO 63104
Hamilton Heights
Neighborhood
Shavette Wayne Organization Inc. 5500 Natural Bridge St. Louis MO 63120 389-3363 [email protected]

Carondelet Community 314-351-

Lenly Weathers Betterment Federation 6308 Michigan St. Louis MO 63111 7274
314-351-
Lenly Weathers 313 Iron St. St. Louis MO 63111 7274
Janet Webber 2317-A S. 12th St. St. Louis MO 63104 771-4787 [email protected]
314-481-
Dennis Weber 5212 Winona St. Louis MO 63109 3936

Union Seventy 5391

Wayne Weidemann Clark Properties Center Brown Ave. St. Louis MO 63120 389-8822 [email protected]
Brian Weiler Missouri Department of 105 W. Capital P. O. Box Jefferson MO 65102
Transportation 270 City
Larry Weinles 4232 Castigman St. Louis MO 63110 664-6467
Susie Weis 4129 Flad Ave. St. Louis MO 63110 691-2591 [email protected]
314-631-
Eugene Weiss 7606 Virginia Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 2363
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
314-631-
Janice Weiss 7606 Virginia Ave. St. Louis MO 63111 2363
St. Louis Housing
Quiana Welch Authority 4100 Lindell St. Louis MO 63108 436-2252
Carol Weldon 4028 Fairview Ave. St. Louis MO 63116 773-7243
Cathy Weldon The Porch 1700 S. 9th St. St. Louis MO 63104 436-0282 [email protected]
[email protected]
Kathleen Wentzel 2222 Hickory St. St. Louis MO 63104 621-5070 om
Carol Wesley 5361 Claxton St. Louis MO 63120 226-9045
Alderman St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
Fred Wessels, Jr. Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
314-367-
Martha West 5112 Greer St. Louis MO 63115 8903
Keith Wheeler 2243 Gasconade St. Louis MO 63118 352-3139 [email protected]
Keith Wheeler 2243 Gasconade St. Louis MO 63118 352-3139 [email protected]
1114 Olive Village
Andrea White Court. St. Louis MO 63132 323-2282
St. Louis Housing
Corena Williams Authority 4100 Lindell St. Louis MO 63108 241-1990
314-749-
Eddie Williams 5825 Janet Ave St. Louis MO 63136 9233 [email protected]
Gina Williams 3522 Humphrey St. Louis MO 63118 954-4063 [email protected]
Hubert &
Lynette Williams 4720 Margaretta St. Louis MO 63115 385-5718
Lucinda Williams 1903 Bacon St. Louis MO 63106 531-5471 [email protected]
1445-47 North 9th
Marion Williams Street St. Louis MO 63106
Nancy Williams 3912 Federer St. Louis MO 63116 752-9011
Rebecca Williams 1819 Kennett Pl. St. Louis MO 63104 776-7593 [email protected]
Dutchtown Business
Shawn Williams Assoc. 2916 Osage Street St. Louis MO 63118 [email protected]
314-389-
Terry Williams 4422 Red Bud Ave St. Louis MO 63115 7648 [email protected]
Troy Williams 3117 Delamr St. Louis MO 63103 533-4900 [email protected]
Williams, St. Louis Development 622-3400 x
Otis P.E. Corporation 1015 Locust Street Suite 1200 St. Louis MO 63101 269 [email protected]
Alderman St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
Frank Williamson Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
Williams-
Irvetta Toler 2800 N. 14th St. St. Louis MO 63136
314-645-
Leah Willson 1061 Terrace Drive St. Louis MO 63117 7260
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
[email protected]
Jeffrey Wilsman 4516 Maryland Ave. St. Louis MO 63108 276-3090 et
Karen Wilson 4549 Ruskin St. Louis MO 63115 389-7204
314-769-
Mary Wilson 2744 Accomac Street St. Louis MO 63104 9400
Grand Oak Hill 865-5530
Zach Wilson Community Corp. 4168 Juniata St. Louis MO 63116 ext. 108 [email protected]
Zach Wilson 3512 McKean St. Louis MO 63118 [email protected]
314-621-
Will Winter 1310 Wright St St. Louis MO 63103 2934
development@cabriniacademy.
Eric Winters 3022 Oregon Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 776-0883 com
314-621-
Virginia Wise 1530 Locust St. #813 St. Louis MO 63103 3051

Adam Wiseman 3660 Wilmington Ave. St. Louis MO 63116 540-5780 [email protected]
2837 Shenandoah
Erin Wittlich Ave St. Louis MO 63104
Sydney Woehler 4205 Utah St. St. Louis MO 63116 762-0777
John Wolf 3614 Tenn. St. Louis MO 63118 865-5144

754-5590 or
Bruce Wood KAI 211 N. Broadway Suite 1900 St. Louis MO 63102 241-8188 [email protected]
Clarice Woodard 1428 Chouteau St. Louis MO 63103 231-3408
1200 314-613-
Kathryn Woodard 418 City Hall Market St. Louis MO 63103 7147 [email protected]
Dennis Woods & Tina Italiano 2708 S. 13th St. St. Louis MO 63118 568-2820 [email protected]
U.S. Department of 1222
Housing & Urban Spruce
Fannie Woods Development Multifamily Housing Street St. Louis MO 63103 539-2127
Diesel Fuel Injection 9331 S. St.
John Wosman President Service Broadway Louis MO 63125 (314) 631-2500
Floyd Wright 4322 Detony Street St. Louis MO 63110 771-3271

Henry Wright 4244 W. Ashland Ave. St. Louis MO 63115 289-9940

201 West
Capitol Av.,
Honorable Wright- MO House of Room Jefferson 573-751-
Robin Jones D-63 Representatives 106B City MO 65101 6800 [email protected]
Honorable Wright-
Robin Jones D-63 P.O. Box 78815 St. Louis MO 63178 776-1499
314-772-
John Wurth 3199 Morganford St. Louis MO 63116 0474 [email protected]
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Wyczackow
Matt ski 4106 Wyoming St. St. Louis MO 63116
Honorable
Pat Yaeger D-96 729 Reed Avenue St. Louis MO 63125 631-7194

201 West
Capitol
Honorable MO House of Ave., Room Jefferson 573-751- [email protected]
Pat Yaeger D-96 Representatives 116A1 City MO 65101 0220 v
Mo House of 729 Reed St.
Pat Yaeger Rep. Representatives Ave Louis MO 63125 314-631-7194
Bill Yancey Gate District 1720 Longfellow St. Louis MO 63104 773-8005

Federation of Block 5050 Highland #7M

Ernestine Yancy Units Board of Directors 63113 St. Louis MO 63113 367-5877
Bud Yanker 2201 A Edwards St. St. Louis MO 63110 [email protected]
1590
Woodlake Chest
Kristi Yates Area Engineer MoDOT Drive erfield MO 63107 314-340-4291
Aimee Young 1932 Dodier St. St. Louis MO 63102 877-9414
Alderwoma St. Louis Board of 1200 Market St. City
n Phyllis Young Aldermen Hall Room 230 St. Louis MO 63103
Diane Young 2235 Jules St. Apt. D St. Louis MO 63104
Fr.
Valentine Young St. Patrick's Church 1000 N. 7th Street St. Louis MO 63101 231-9991
Jim &
Phyllis Young 905 A. Lami St. St. Louis MO 63104 776-1036 [email protected]
Phyllis Young 1200 Market Rm 230 St. Louis MO 63103 622-3766
Brandee Zahner 3333 Illinois Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 [email protected]
Sandra Zak 730 Carroll St. St. Louis MO 63104 622-4180 [email protected]
Keith Zarczynski 1021 Allen Ave. #A St. Louis MO 63104 621-6230 [email protected]
531-0330
Patrick Zarrick St. Louis U. High 4970 Oakland Ave. St. Louis MO 63110 x132
Jim Zavist 6707 Oleatha Ave. St. Louis MO 63139 973-6724 [email protected]
Sanjin Zdrnja 4940 Blow St. St. Louis MO 63109 [email protected]
Steve Zeiger Gate District 2901 Lafayette Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 865-2387 [email protected]
Elizabeth Zempel 3859 Flora Place St. Louis MO 63110 773-7347 [email protected]
314-335-
Denise Zerillo 105 Oakwood St. Louis MO 63119 4052 [email protected]
2111
Telegraph St.
Frank Ziegler, Jr. Midwest Bank Centre Rd. Louis MO 63125 314-544-8505
 Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Zoole
Becky Elkana 3637 Winnebago St. St. Louis MO 63116 [email protected]
Sead &
Vajta Zulic Golden Grain 4573 Gravois Ave. St. Louis MO 63116 752-3004
Glenda &
Ron Spooty's 1028 Geyer Ave. St. Louis MO 63104 436-7131 [email protected]
Habib & Lincoln Auto Body, Paint
Mustafa & Repair 116 East Courtois St. Louis MO 63111 638-5717
Kathleen &
Bill Great Grizzly Bear 4456 Mattis Rd. St. Louis MO 63128 845-8371 [email protected]
Rafael
Saloma 231 S. Beniston Ave. St. Louis MO 63105 [email protected]
Resident 2900 Park St. Louis MO 63104 771-2530

ABECU/AECU 1001 Lynch Street St. Louis MO 63118 [email protected]

Alhuda 4743 Morganford St. Louis MO 63116 481-0992
American Eagle Credit
Union 2101 South Jefferson St. Louis MO 63104 772-3438
Appraisal Resource
Group 2000 S. 11th St. St. Louis MO 63104 772-2533 [email protected]
Arber 6955 Gravois St. Louis MO 63116 481-7933
Babylon Grocery &
Bakery 3803 Meramec St. Louis MO 63116 832-3447
Big Daddy's 1000 Sidney St. St. Louis MO 63104
Creative Events 7
Catering 34 Upper Ladue St. Louis MO 63124
100 S. Brentwood 314-863-
Cushman Wakefield Blvd. Suite 222 St. Louis MO 63105 4447

Fairgrounds Community
Development
Organization 3808 West Florissant St. Louis MO 63107
Fat Toney's BBQ 1629 S. 9th St. St. Louis MO 63104 241-7429 [email protected]
4101 & 4103 South
Kabob Café Grand Ave. St. Louis MO 63118 752-5539
Kabob House 4940 Christy Blvd. St. Louis MO 63116 832-2977
4131 South Grand
National City Bank Blvd. St. Louis MO 63118
Patrick Henry School 1200 N. 10th Street St. Louis MO 63101 231-7284
Southern Commercial 5515 South Grand
Bank Blvd. St. Louis MO 63118 481-6800
Third Ward 3808 W Florissant
Neighborhood Council Ave St. Louis MO 63107 533-2030
Northside-Southside - General Mailing List
Updated: November 06, 2007
Westco Machinery 718 Cass Avenue St. Louis MO 63106 421-4654

481-2340 or
Zainabu's Child Care 5009 Dewey Ave Ladue MO 363-1748
 Northside-Southside Study
Hotline Message L og
Updated October 18, 2007
DATE NAME ADDRESS PHONE REQUEST/COMMENT RESPONSE
6/6/06 John Morton 802-8847 My suggestions are:
1) Extend the subway as far as Bates
2) Extend the Subway along Gravois
3) Have Sunday service on 48 and 49.

06/13/06 Natasha Willis 314-599-6339 Calling about Southside Open House Left Message on 06/15/06
on June 15 for more information.

06/14/06 Mr. Wilson 314-535-1220 Needs information about Open Returned call on
Houses. 06/15/06 – Left message.

06/14/06 Roger Wilson 535-1220 Called again for information.

 Northside-Southside Study
Hotline Message L og
Updated October 18, 2007
06/14/06 Roger Wilson 535-1220 Called again about open house.

06/21/06 Ray Preston 314-960-3430 I am calling concerning the Southside

study area for the proposed Metrolink
line. I am looking at the map and I see
that it runs right down Chouteau Ave.
I have home on Chouteau near
Jefferson on the Northside at 2649
Chouteau. I am just wondering if my
home is in danger of being taken away
from me. If you can give me a holler
and have someone speak to me who
knows what exactly this proposal is
looking like as far as where on
Chouteau you are running this, I
would greatly appreciate it.
06/30/06 Ray Preston 960-3430 Called a week ago – no one got back Laurna and Brian talked
to him. Owns a home near Chouteau – to Ray.
very interested in the proposed South
side route for MetroLink expansion.
He is available on his cell phone
anytime, day or evening.

07/26/06 Christy Solomon 314-773-9090 Has a question about transportation.

ext. 173 Would like one of the Northside-
Southside representatives to call her
back.
 Northside-Southside Study
Hotline Message L og
Updated October 18, 2007
09/19/06 Adam 367-6612 x29 Works on Marquee Newspaper for 09/19/06 - Mandi Sent
Lafayette Square. He has had requests flyer and information via
for workshop dates to be included in e-mail.
the newspaper.

Please send information to him via e-

mail at [email protected]
10/02/06 Dana Gray 772-6082 President of the Southwest Garden 10/02/06 – Mandi called
Neighborhood Association. Heard back, left message with
about the upcoming meetings and date, time & location
would like to know date and time information for the
information for the Southside Southside Workshop.
workshop.

10/20/06 Alonzo? 389-0988 Left no message, just inaudible name 10/24 – Mandi called
and phone number. back, was a wrong
number, someone trying
to reach their case
worker.

10/20/06 Reverand Cleo 385-4555 Left only name and phone number. 10/24 – Mandi called &
left voicemail with
further contact
information.
 Northside-Southside Study
Hotline Message L og
Updated October 18, 2007
10/20/06 Craig Riggins 314-652-9812 Co-host of Sunday morning talk at 10/24 – Mandi called
or 314-479- WESL. Wanted to have representative Craig & apologized for
6745 on Sunday morning show. Co-host is not getting his call before
Keith Antoine. (Left message Friday Sunday morning. He was
afternoon.) happy his call was
returned & wants to
follow up with more
information. At Craig’s
request, Mandi also
called WESL voicemail
& left further contact
information.
10/20/06 No Name No Number Received yellow pamphlet pertaining NA
to October 26th meeting. Is concerned
with inaccuracy because pamphlet
says East instead of West. Kept
reiterating that pamphlet was
inaccurate.

10/23/06 No Name No Number Would rather talk about health habits NA

instead and what can be done to better
health in the neighborhoods instead of
meeting about MetroLink.

10/23/06 No Name No Number Would like to speak with a person. NA

Left no name or number.
 Northside-Southside Study
Hotline Message L og
Updated October 18, 2007
10/27/06 Roy Palmer 381-3493 1) Called about study flyer saying 10/30/06 - Paula
East instead of West on Natural returned this call. She
bridge. Wanted to check if that was a left a voicemail noting
mistake in the print. 2) Wanted to there was on error in the
suggest putting in a parking lot instead print and that we will
of parking on the street. Will not be note his comments for
able to attend the meeting. Please take the meeting.
down his notes.
10/27/06 Marlene Harris 531-2602 or She is with fifth missionary Baptist 10/27/06 – Mandi
588-8846 Church, someone left a coat at the returned call. Paula will
meeting last night. Please call back. pick up coat today.
Would like Laurna to call her.

10/31/06 Dana Gray 772-6082 She is with the Southwest Garden 11/2/06 – Paula returned
Fax: 772-3214 Neighborhood Association. She would call & emailed Dana the
like to get copies of maps showing the newsletter & Chouteau
recommended stations for the union alternative. Also mailed
pacific railroad route. She said the newsletters & brochures
maps and links online are not live, for the next Southwest
such as the brochure and the Garden Association
newsletters. meeting.
11/06/06 Tom Stremlau Daytime: He is President of Hill 2000, which is 11/7/06 – Mandi
822-6715 the Neighborhood Organization of the returned call and set-up
Evening: Hill. He is wondering if someone can meeting.
773-3560 come to their next general meeting,
Thursday, November 16th and talk
about the NS transit study. Knows
some routes close to their
neighborhood are being considered
and thinks it would be of interest to
their general population.
 Northside-Southside Study
Hotline Message L og
Updated October 18, 2007
11/8/06 Al Ratz 385 South Taylor Wants to be added to mailing list. No 11/8/08 – Mandi added
Kirkwood, MO return call necessary. to mailing list.
63122

11/19/06 No name No Number Call from a woman who lives in NA

Pacific Missouri. Was wondering if
MetroLink would ever come out that
way. She knows that a lot of people
who live in that area would use
MetroLink if it came that direction.
Wanted to give her input.
11/28/06 573-751-2126 Calling to tell us that Senator Harry NA
Kennedy plans on attending the
meeting on December 5 for the
Northside-Southside study.

12/06/06 Mark Krebs 314-342-0714 He is from Laclede Gas. He was 12/06 – Paula returned
wondering if prior to the meeting the call. She left him a
there was any electronic voicemail directing him to
documentation of a plan you could the website. All the
email him. His email address is documents, maps, etc. are
[email protected]. available off the site as a
.pdf. She asked him to call
her directly if he needed
something else.
 Northside-Southside Study
Hotline Message L og
Updated October 18, 2007
12/18/06 Ray Freeman 535-6580 Wanted to attend the meeting in
or October on the South side but didn’t
535-6300 make it. Wants to know if the minutes
were transcribed or if anything is in
print as to what transpired. Would like
informational relative to expansion
plans of by-state Metro. Hopes to hear
back before too long.
2/2/07 May Cross 652-1743 Interested in involvement in the Paula returned call,
Northside-Southside study. advised this is not a
marketing research
study. Involvement is
strictly voluntary.

2/12/07 May Cross 652-1743 Interested in involvement in the NA

Northside-Southside study.

6/12/07 Raymond 314-752-3877 Wants to get information about Paula left message to call
Freeman getting on the mailing list for getting advising to contact East-
information about East-West Gateway West Gateway Council
Council of Governments relative to of Governments.
how money gets spent in the area on
transportation.
 Northside-Southside Study
Hotline Message L og
Updated October 18, 2007
9/17/07 Raymond 314-752-3877 Got the newsletter about meetings this Paula left message to
Freeman week and was wondering about the call.
meeting at Meramec Elementary at the
school and needs to know what night.
Needs a little more information.

9/18/07 Starla White 314-229-6344 Asks for a call back as soon as Paula left message to
possible call.

9/19/07 Princess Walker 314-531-2101 With the Metro Cennetenial Journal Paula called and advised
and wanted to see if they could run we will not run any more
any advertising for us. advertisements.

9/19/07 Tim Holt 314-922-6220 Calling regarding Northside-Southside Paula called and walked
study and wants someone to call him through location of
back. materials on the website.
 Northside-Southside Study
Hotline Message L og
Updated October 18, 2007
9/27/07 Delishia Dunn 314-226-9724 Got some information that we posted Paula called and left
a list where she can sign up for section message advising this is a
eight and would like to know about it. transportation planning
(I do not think this call was for NS.) study.,

10/9/07 Frank Boskiss 3311 South 314-229-1756 I live at 3311 South Jefferson. Paula returned call on
Jefferson, St. Louis Actually this is the first time I have 10/15/07.
MO heard of the north-south coming down
Jefferson Avenue, I was curious about
any kind of impact that is going to
have, with our buildings especially
since a lot of them our the are historic
and older. I am sure the rattling of the
streets is going to cause quite an
impact on the brick and mortar and
cause some damage. I very curious
about any of the studies and all the
information. I’m kind of perusing
through the website to find out more
information. I’d love to get a call
back.
10/17/07 Paula Hood 331-4726 My name is Paula Hood and I am Paula returned call on
calling regarding the Northside- 10/19/07 and advised we
Southside Study. I had a question that do not have plans to
I would like to ask you. Will you purchase property for
please give me a call. the project along Bircher
and I-70.
Get Involved
Your involvement in the Northside-Southside Study is important to the study’s success.
Besides our public meetings, which will be held at study milestones, we have provided
Study Timeline
numerous opportunities for you to give your input.
The Northside-Southside Study will take approximately 18 months to complete and
Call Us: Write Us: will follow federal guidelines. The first two tasks will involve analyzing the study area’s
314-621-3385 Northside-Southside Study
c/o Vector Communications existing and future conditions, then updating the previous planning study’s Purpose
Email Us: 701 N. 15th Street, Mailbox 43 and Need Statement, which outlines the problems to be addressed by a major transit
[email protected] St. Louis. MO 63103 investment and includes the study’s goals and objectives. Based on these goals, the
Visit our website at: study team will develop preliminary alternatives, based on the LPAs resulting from the
www.northsouthstudy.org previous study, and analyze them. Then a few alternatives will be selected for more
detailed engineering and evaluation. Using criteria that include ridership, costs and
During the study, technical documents will be developed and available for your review. other factors, the alternatives will be evaluated against one another. Then a refined
If you do not have Internet access, these documents can be viewed at the locations
locally preferred alternative will be selected for both Northside and Southside.
listed below.

Citizens for Modern Transit St. Louis Regional Chamber & Growth Assn.
911 Washington, Suite 200 One Metropolitan Square, Suite 1300
St. Louis, MO 63101 St. Louis, MO 63102 Study Begins Late 2005
(314) 231-7272 (314) 231-5555

Downtown St. Louis Partnership Inc. Existing/Future Conditions Winter 2006

906 Olive Street, Suite 200
St. Louis, MO 63101
(314) 436-6500 Purpose and Need Winter 2006
The Reference Desks of the following St. Louis Public Library Branches:
Preliminary Alternatives
Central Library Julia Davis Spring 2006
1301 Olive Street (63103) 4415 Natural Bridge Ave. (63115) Development & Screening
(314) 241-2288 (314) 383-3021
Cabanne Kingshighway
1106 Union Blvd. (63113) 2260 South Vandeventer Ave. (63110 ) Detailed Definition of Alternatives Spring 2006
(314) 367-0717 (314) 771-5450
Carondelet Walnut Park
6800 Michigan Ave. (63111) 5760 West Florissant Ave (63120) Detailed Alternatives Evaluation Summer 2006
(314) 752-9224 (314) 383-1210
Carpenter
3309 South Grand Blvd. (63118) Locally Preferred Alternatives Refined Early 2007 Sponsored by East-West Gateway Council of Governments, Metro, and
(314) 772-6586 the Missouri Department of Transportation.

www.nor thsouthstudy.org
 Planning along the Union Pacific Railroad then via I-55 in mixed traffic. Downtown access would
involve using Grand Avenue and a reserved curb lane on Market Street for bus use
The maps below depict the study areas and the preferred transit routes

Transit Improvements
that were approved in 2000. The current study will focus on the Northside
during peak traffic periods. portion of the City of St. Louis between I-70 and downtown St. Louis and the
Southside portion between I-55 at Loughborough and downtown.
for St. Louis City Sharing both corridors will be a Downtown St. Louis Loop. The route selected
during the MTIAs involves a single-track loop using 14th Street, Market Street, 7th Street
and Washington Avenue. However, these streets will be re-examined during the
T he Northside-Southside Transit Improvements Study is an 18-month Northside-Southside Study.
planning study that is looking at MetroLink and other transit improvements for the City
of St. Louis. It is a continuation of the studies completed in 2000 known as the Major
Transportation Investment Analyses or MTIAs. These studies resulted in the
selection of locally preferred alternatives (LPAs) to best address transportation and
other related needs in North St. Louis City and County, South St. Louis City and County
and West St. Louis County. The Northside-Southside Study will update and refine the
LPAs that were selected for transit improvements in portions of St. Louis City.

East-West Gateway Council of Governments, the region’s local planning

organization, is conducting the Northside-Southside Study along with its partners,
Metro and the Missouri Department of Transportation. It has hired a consulting team,
led by HNTB, along with URS and Vector Communications, to assist with the study.
Funding for the Northside-Southside Study is made possible through state transpor-
tation development tax credits for distressed areas. Under Missouri law, St. Louis City
is considered a distressed area.

Previous Transportation Planning Results

The Northside-Southside Study will build upon LPAs selected during the
MTIAs of 2000. However because of financial constraints, only portions of the LPAs
will be studied during the Northside-Southside Study.

The Northside LPA is a light rail extension from downtown St. Louis to North
St. Louis County. It recommended using rights-of-way within 14th Street, North
Florissant Avenue, Natural Bridge Avenue, Riverview Boulevard, the Norfolk Southern
Railroad and West Florissant Avenue.

Two LPAs were selected for the Southside. One alternative recommended a
light rail extension from downtown St. Louis to South St. Louis County that would use
rights-of-way within 14th Street, Chouteau Avenue, and the Union Pacific Railroad to
I-55. The other alternative suggested a new two-lane bus-only roadway known as
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) that would allow buses to move at higher speeds. The route
would travel from near Grand Avenue to Loughborough Avenue using rights-of-way
June 2006, Issue 1
MetroLink Expansion Focus of New Study
MetroLink and other transit improvements for Northside, Southside and downtown that includes
within the City of St. Louis are the focus of a current station locations and design, costs and benefits,
IN THIS ISSUE transit planning study and the subject of a series of environmental impacts and economic development
Transit Seeks to upcoming public open houses scheduled for June 13- opportunities. East-West Gateway’s Board of
Address Neighbor- 15, 2006. Sponsored by East-West Gateway Council Directors will make the final decision as to which
hood Problems of Governments, Metro and the Missouri Department alternative is best for each corridor.
page 2 of Transportation, the 18-month planning study,
known as the “Northside-Southside Transit Improve-
Transit Can Spur ments Study,” is looking at light rail and other transit
improvements for sections of North St. Louis, South Northside – Tuesday, June 13, 2006
Economic
Development St. Louis and downtown. The study’s goal is to select 5:00 p.m. – 7:30 p.m.
page 2 a locally preferred alternative (LPA) for each area. Herbert Hoover Boys and Girls Club
2901 N. Grand
The Northside-Southside Study is the St. Louis, MO 63107
How to Get Presentations at 5:30 p.m. and 6:30 p.m.
Involved continuation of previous planning studies
page 2 completed in 2000 that were called Major
Transportation Investment Analyses or MTIAs. These Downtown – Wednesday, June 14, 2006
studies resulted in LPAs being selected to best 3:30 p.m. – 6:00 p.m.
address transportation and other related problems Downtown St. Louis Partnership
Street Running 906 Olive St.
Segments in North St. Louis City and County, South St. Louis
Considered City and County and West County. Using federal St. Louis, MO 63101
Page 3 guidelines, the Northside-Southside Study is Presentations at 4:00 p.m. and 5:15 p.m.
re-examining the LPAs that involved portions of St.
Louis City, plus looking at new ones. Southside – Thursday, June 15, 2006
Evaluating
5:00 p.m. – 7:30 p.m.
Alternatives
page 3 At the June open houses, attendees will be Monsanto Center
able to view and to comment on preliminary light rail Missouri Botanical Garden
and other rapid transit routes. (See box.) The 4500 Shaw Blvd. (at Vandeventer)
information at all three open houses will be the St. Louis, MO 63110
Funding Transit Presentations at 5:30 p.m. and 6:30 p.m.
Improvements same. You are welcome to stop by any time.
Page 4
The Northside-Southside Study is scheduled
for completion in the spring of 2007. At that time,
we will recommend and present to the public an LPA

Planning Transit Improvements for St. Louis City June 2006 page 1
Get Involved Transit Seeks to Address Neighborhood Problems
Call Us:
314-621-3385 Transit improvements should not only provide more travel options for residents,
Email Us: but they should also help address a community’s problems. In order to do this, it is
[email protected] important for transit planners to first understand the issues a community faces.
Write Us:
Because the “Northside-Southside Transit Improvements Study” is building upon
Northside-Southside Study
c/o Vector Communications
previous planning studies, the study team first reviewed the problems identified during
701 N. 15th Street, Mailbox 43 that work. We then looked at existing and future conditions such as population trends and
St. Louis. MO 63103 traffic levels. This information, together with
input from dozens of government, community
Visit our website at: and civic leaders, helped us create what is
www.northsouthstudy.org Emerson Park, IL known in transit planning as the Purpose and
During the study, technical documents will Need Statement. This statement identifies
be developed and available for your review. the study area’s problems and opportunities
If you do not have Internet access, these as well as the goals and objectives that transit
documents can be viewed at the locations improvements can address.
listed below.
Citizens for Modern Transit For the Northside-Southside Study, some of the problems the study team
911 Washington, Suite 200 has identified are:
St. Louis, MO 63101 l Lack of sustainable development due to declining population, physical
(314) 231-7272 deterioration and loss of economic vitality and
St. Louis Regional Chamber & Growth Assn. l Lack of access to opportunity because of lengthy travel times, few

One Metropolitan Square, Suite 1300 transportation choices and the mismatch of jobs and workers’ residences.
St. Louis, MO 63102
We then used this information to develop the initial set of preliminary alternatives or
(314) 231-5555
routes. These alternatives, along with the Purpose and Need Statement and supporting
Downtown St. Louis Partnership Inc. documentation, will be presented at the June open houses.
906 Olive Street, Suite 200
St. Louis, MO 63101
(314) 436-6500
The Reference Desks at the following
Transit Can Help Spur Economic Development
St. Louis Public Library Branches:
Central Library
One of the goals of the “Northside-Southside Transit Improvements Study” is to
1301 Olive Street (63103) help stabilize and/or revitalize neighborhoods. One way to achieve this goal is through
(314) 241-2288 transit-oriented development or TOD, which is a mix of residences, stores, restaurants and
Cabanne services within walking distance, usually one-half mile, of a transit station.
1106 Union Blvd. (63113)
(314) 367-0717
Carondelet
TOD tends to attract many residents who are likely to use transit, thus increasing
6800 Michigan Ave. (63111) system ridership – and attracting developers. During the Northside-Southside Study, we
(314) 752-9224 will design stations that welcome residential development mixed with stores, restaurants
Carpenter and services, and that are “walkable,” so pedestrians can access activities without using
3309 South Grand Blvd. (63118) a car.
(314) 772-6586
Mixed-use development in Kirkwood, MO

Julia Davis
The residential development around
4415 Natural Bridge Ave. (63115)
(314) 383-3021 the Emerson Park MetroLink station
Kingshighway in East St. Louis, Illinois is a local TOD
2260 South Vandeventer Ave. (63110 ) example. Although it lacks the transit
(314) 771-5450 component for TOD, the new develop-
Walnut Park
ment in Kirkwood, Missouri near the
5760 West Florissant Ave (63120)
(314) 383-1210 historic Amtrak station is an example
of the mixed-use development that is a
June 2006 page 2 hallmark of TOD.
Street Running Segments Being How to Evaluate the Different
Considered in Study Alternatives
Currently St. Louis’ Metro- In order to reduce the number of preliminary alternatives to one
Link system is the only modern light each for the Northside, Southside and downtown
rail system in the United States that corridors, they must be carefully evaluated using
does not have street running sections established criteria. The study team has developed
– where trains run on tracks in city evaluation criteria for the “Northside-Southside
streets. But that may change. Street Transit Improvements Study.” Because transit improve-
running light rail segments are being ments must address a corridor’s problems, some of the
considered in the “Northside-South- criteria for the corridors differ.
side Transit Improvements Study.”
Such designs are popular because Below is a partial list of evaluation criteria that
they bring riders closer to their will be presented at the June open houses for your
Street running in Portland, OR
destinations, plus their visibility helps attract comment.
economic development.

Until the mid-1900’s, the City of St. Louis had Northside/Southside Criteria: Downtown Criteria:
a streetcar system. Although light rail is often consid- l Major travel markets l Ridership:
ered the successor to streetcars, the only similarities l Employment concentration m Employment and activity
are that both can run in existing streets and are l Population concentrations centers
powered by overhead electrical systems. The old l Transit-dependent populations m Special Events
streetcars typically ran in the center of streets with the l Transportation system m Directness
vehicle traffic. However, today’s street running light connectivity m Speed
rail vehicles are usually placed in reserved lanes and l Sustainable development m Proximity
do not operate in mixed traffic. At major intersections, opportunity
such vehicles can obey standard traffic signals, or l Right-of-way impacts l Existing and Potential
separate signals can be installed to control the Development
l Physical feasibility
movement of trains only.
l Capital cost
l Capital, operating and
Street running trains are being considered for maintenance costs
such areas as Natural Bridge Avenue on the Northside,
Chouteau and Gravois Avenues on the Southside and
l Impacts:
for downtown. If there are street running segments, m Traffic

the trains will be different from the high-floor cars m Parking

and platforms currently used by MetroLink. Instead, m Safety

low-floor trains and platforms will be considered. This m Existing MetroLink
can result in better visible integration into the station m Construction
surroundings.

St udy T i mel i ne
Study Begins Existing/Future Purpose and Need Preliminary Detailed Definition Detailed Refinement of
Conditions Alternatives of Alternatives Alternatives Locally Preferred
Development and Evaluation Alternatives
Screening
Late 2005 Winter 2006 Winter 2006 Spring 2006 Summer 2006 Fall 2006 Early 2007
5
We are here
June 2006 page 3
 Northside-Southside Study
c/o Vector Communications
701 N. 15th Street, Mailbox 43
St. Louis. MO 63103

How to Fund Transit Improvements

Funding for the “Northside-Southside Transit Improvements Study” is made possible through state transportation develop-
ment tax credits for distressed areas. Under Missouri definitions, the City of St. Louis is classified as a distressed area. Therefore,
only portions of the Northside and Southside corridors from the previous planning studies that fall within the City of St. Louis are
currently being studied.

The Northside-Southside Study is following federal guidelines in order to be able to compete eventually for capital funding
through the Federal Transit Administration’s New Starts program, the primary source for federal funding for major transit projects.
If St. Louis is selected for the New Starts program, it could receive up to 50% of construction costs. However, the remaining 50%
would have to come from non-federal sources.

Transit is generally funded by a combination of federal, state, local and private sources. Missouri law allows for a maximum
full cent tax for transportation, of which a quarter cent is currently being used by Metro. This tax was passed by St. Louis City and
County voters in 1994. However in 1997, an additional quarter cent increase passed in the City but not in the County. Besides
traditional funding programs, creative funding approaches (such as the tax credits used to pay for this study) might be used to
reduce the resources needed for the local share.

www.northsouthstudy.org
October 2006, Issue 2
Public’s Input Needed at MetroLink Station
Station Planning Workshops Planning Workshops
IN THIS ISSUE
New MetroLink
Looking at possible station locations Come help plan what stations should look like!
Route Being for the final set of MetroLink alternatives
Studied
page 2
and suggesting potential development and Downtown
redevelopment opportunities around them Tuesday, October 24, 2006
will be the focus of the next round of 4:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. (Presentation at 4:30)
Land Use and public meetings for the “Northside-Southside
Transit-Oriented Regional Collaboration Center • 12th Floor
Transit Improvements Study.” The station
Development One Metropolitan Square
page 3 planning workshops will be held on three
St. Louis, MO 63102
consecutive days from October 24-26 at
various locations throughout the city. The
Maps of Final
Alternatives same information will be presented at each Southside
meeting. See the box on this page for the Wednesday, October 25, 2006
page 4 & 5 exact dates, times and locations of the 5:00 p.m. – 7:00 p.m. (Presentation at 5:30)
workshops. Lift for Life Academy • Cafeteria
Public Comments 1731 S. Broadway
at June Meetings Because you know your neighborhoods St. Louis, MO 63104
page 6 and what is needed to revitalize them, your
attendance at these workshops is important
Special Meeting
so please make every effort to attend. To
learn more about land use and development
Northside
for Limited English
Speaking Public opportunities around station stops, see the Thursday, October 26, 2006
page 7 article on page three. 5:00 p.m. – 7:00 p.m. (Presentation at 5:30)
Fifth Missionary Baptist Church
How to Get Fellowship Hall
Involved 3736 Natural Bridge
page 8 St. Louis, MO 63107

Planning Transit Improvements for St. Louis City October 2006 page 1
Another MetroLink Route Being Studied for St. Louis City
Since the initial set of potential MetroLink at a new Southside alternative. It would travel along
Chouteau to Jefferson and then on Jefferson to I-55
alternatives and other transit improvements were
presented to the public last June as part of the ending near Bayless Avenue. Not only does this new
“Northside-Southside Transit Improvements Study,” alternative avoid use of the railroad right-of-way, but
changes have been made. The study team has replaced it also has strong development opportunities and
one Southside MetroLink alternative for another. ridership benefits. The Jefferson/I-55 alternative will
replace the Chouteau/Grand alternative. The latter was
Previously shown to the public in June, four removed because of serious roadway impacts on Grand
preliminary Southside alternatives involved shared use Avenue.
of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way (UPRR) – three
MetroLink and one Bus Rapid Transit. At recent meetings The goal of the Northside-Southside Study is
with UPRR officials, it was determined that the railroad’s to select one locally preferred route or alternative for
requirements for shared use of its private right-of-way North St. Louis and South St. Louis with a connection in
could result in many adjacent residences and businesses downtown. The study is scheduled for completion next
being impacted. Because of this, the study team looked spring.

October 2006 page 2

Land Use & Transit-Oriented Development
An important part of the “Northside-Southside Transit
Study TimeLine
Improvements Study” is an evaluation of how light rail transit can help
stabilize neighborhoods through development around station locations.
Residential, commercial or institutional land use can greatly define a
neighborhood’s character and the quality of life for its residents. Each type
Study Begins Late
of land use offers different services. For example, commercial land use can 2005
bring businesses such as dental and insurance offices to a neighborhood,
while institutional land use can bring schools and the youthful vibrancy of
students.
Exisiting & Future Winter
Conditions 2006
In planning
major public
infrastructure Purpose & Need Winter/Spring
projects such as
MetroLink, it is 2006
important to
understand how Preliminary Spring/
light rail affects Summer
land use and how
Alternatives
land use affects Development & 2006
Transit-Oriented Development in Portland, Oregon
neighborhoods. Transit- Screening
oriented development (TOD) around stations is usually a mix of residential We Are Here
housing units, commercial services and retail shops. Building a variety of
development within walking distance of a transit station serves the needs Detailed Definition Fall
of both the neighborhood and transit commuters. It not only encourages of Alternatives 2006
pedestrians to frequent the local businesses en route to the stations, but it
also gives commuters access to more jobs and services.
Detailed
The redevelopment of Cupples Warehouses adjacent to the Stadium
MetroLink station in downtown St. Louis is an example of transit-oriented Alternatives Fall/Winter
development. The six-block area includes a hotel, apartments, restaurants Evaluation 2006
and offices within adaptively reused, former warehouses, as well as future
public green space.
Refinement of Spring
To learn what station stops are being considered for the final
alternatives for the Northside-Southside Study and to give your input on Locally Preferred 2007
potential development opportunities around them, attend one of the Alternatives
October station planning workshops. See the cover page for the exact
dates, times and locations.
Evaluating developments as part of a transit study helps
ensure that a planned public infrastructure project such as MetroLink,
positively enhances a neighborhood and its residents’
quality of life.

October 2006 page 3

 Maps of Final Alternatives
T he following maps outline the MetroLink and other transit alternatives that are now going through
detailed analysis as part of the “Northside-Southside Transit Improvements Study.” They were
determined with help from the public’s input at the June meetings. In addition to the alternatives below,
the Jefferson/I-55 alternative shown on page 2 is also undergoing further study.

Northside Route Alternative

Natural Bridge Avenue / 14th Street is
the locally preferred alternative(LPA) from
previous planning studies. The route travels
north out of downtown on 14th Street, north
along North Florissant Avenue, west on
Natural Bridge and north on Goodfellow
terminating at Interstate 70. This alternative
would serve the core of Northside
residential and commercial development
including the Union 70 employment center.

Downtown Route Alternatives

Two alternatives are proposed to serve the downtown
area. On the left is a single one-way couplet using
9th and 10th Streets, while the one below is a single-
track loop traveling Olive and Chestnut Streets.

October 2006 page 4

Southside Route Alternatives
The Chouteau Avenue / Union Pacific Rail
Road (LPA) route travels south out of downtown
on 14th Street, west along Chouteau Avenue and
south on the Union Pacific Rail Road (UPRR) right-
of-way terminating in the vicinity of Interstate 55
and Loughborough Avenue. The Chouteau Avenue
route would provide service to development along
Chouteau.

The Gravois Avenue / UPRR route travels

south out of downtown on 14th Street or Tucker
Boulevard, south on Tucker Boulevard, southwest
on Gravois Avenue and south on the UPRR right-
of-way terminating in the vicinity of Interstate
55 and Loughborough Avenue. This alternative
would service transit dependent markets along
Gravois.

The Bus Rapid Transit / UPRR (LPA) route

travels west out of downtown on Market Street/
Forest Park Avenue, south on the UPRR right-of-
way terminating in the vicinity of Interstate 55 and
Loughborough Avenue. The BRT provides service
to St. Louis University, Forest Park Parkway and
Market Street.

* Southside Jefferson Alignment shown on page 2.

October 2006 page 5

 Public Comments on Transit Options at June Meetings
Dozens of citizens gave their input on
several potential MetroLink routes and other transit
improvements for the City of St. Louis at the first round
of public meetings for the “Northside-Southside Transit
Improvements Study” held last June. Eight preliminary
alternatives were presented. Three of them were carried
over from previous planning studies completed in 2000.

Southside Open House

The majority of respondents (85%) said lack of
sustainable development, lack of access to opportunity,
and safety and security issues were correctly identified as
reasons to make transit improvements within the City of
St. Louis.

Northside Open House

Among the Northside preliminary alternatives
viewed by the public, Natural Bridge Avenue received the
most favorable responses on the Northside. Downtown
and Southside preliminary alternatives had much more
mixed responses. Both the Olive/Chestnut Single-Track
Loop and the 9th/10th One-Way Couplet downtown
received positive responses. On the Southside, all three
MetroLink alternatives (Chouteau/UPRR, Chouteau/Grand,
and Gravois/UPRR) received more positive comments
than negative comments. Respondents said these Downtown Open House
alternatives provided opportunities for development Attendees also commented on what criteria should
and served the most people. be most important when deciding which preliminary
alternatives should be further studied. For the Northside
The Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) along the Union
and Southside, they noted sustainable development
Pacific Railroad right-of-way on the Southside and the
opportunities and population considerations. Ridership
14th Street/West Florissant Avenue alignment on the
and development were the top two criteria selected for
Northside received the least favorable responses.
downtown.
Participants did not like the BRT alternative because
it was not light rail transit. They also did not favor the Public input played an important role in
West Florissant Avenue alternative because they said it determining which alternatives moved forward for further
is remote and would not serve enough populated areas. study. Thanks to everyone who attended. To review maps
In addition to the preliminary alternatives, attendees of the alternatives that are now going through detailed
commented on why transit improvements were needed. analysis, please see pages 4 and 5.
Thanks to all who attended the open houses for your input!
October 2006 page 6
Limited English Speaking Residents Attend Profile of Attendees
Special Meetings
In addition to the general public open houses, two special from June Meetings
meetings were held on Sunday, June 11, 2006 for limited English
speaking residents. Such residents are increasing in population
A profile of meeting
particularly in the City of St. Louis. A number of African, Latino, attendees was developed
Vietnamese and Bosnian citizens attended the meetings, which were based upon descriptions
presented in each group’s native language. One meeting was held at provided in response to
St. Cecilia’s Catholic Church on Louisiana and the other at the questions in the last
International Institute on South Grand Avenue. More than 40 people
attended the meetings and gave their input.
portion of the comment
form.
The same potential MetroLink routes and other transit
improvements that were presented at the general public meetings
were presented at the limited English speaking ones. Attendees made General Meeting Attendees
comments on the routes similar to what was said at the general public
meetings. For more information on what open house participants had
80% Residents
to say see the article on page 6.
32% Frequent Traveler
13% Other (CMT, Metro employee,
young professional)

11% Business Owner

3% Adjacent Property Owner
1% Elected Official

Special Meeting Attendees

Members of 54% Residents
the St. Louis
Vietnamese 15% Nearby Property Owner
community
listen to a 15% Frequent Traveler
presentation
5% Business Owner
5% Elected Official
2% Other

Comment forms were available in several

languages at the special public meetings

October 2006 page 7

 Northside-Southside Study
c/o Vector Communications
701 N. 15th Street, Mailbox 43
St. Louis. MO 63103

Get Involved!
Visit a study information site to review the latest technical
information if you do not have Internet access.
The Reference Desk at these library branches:
Write Us: • Central Library, 1301 Olive Street (63103)
Northside-Southside Study • Cabanne, 1106 Union Blvd. (63113)
c/o Vector Communications • Carondelet, 6800 Michigan Ave. (63111)
701 N. 15th Street, Mailbox 43 • Carpenter, 3309 South Grand Blvd. (63118)
St. Louis, Missouri 63103 • Julia Davis, 4415 Natural Bridge Ave. (63115)
• Kingshighway, 2260 South Vandeventer Ave. (63110)
Call Us: • Walnut Park, 5760 West Florissant Ave. (63120)
314-621-3385
Other locations:
E-Mail Us: Citizens for Modern Transit
[email protected] 911 Washington, Suite 200, 63101
St. Louis Regional Chamber & Growth Association
Visit Our Web Site: One Metropolitan Square, 63102
www.northsouthstudy.org Downtown St. Louis Partnership Inc.
906 Olive, Suite 200, 63101

www.northsouthstudy.org
Sept. 2007, Issue 3
Final Round of Public Open MetroLink Public Open Houses
Houses for Expanding Light Come view the evaluation results for
potential St. Louis City MetroLink
IN THIS ISSUE
Rail in City Scheduled routes and tell us what you think . . .
Public Open
House Schedule
We need your opinion! Come to Northside
Tuesday, Sept. 18, 2007
page 1 one of the final public open houses 5:00 p.m. – 7:30 p.m.
for expanding MetroLink within the City Fifth Missionary Baptist Church
Evaluaion of St. Louis. You will be able to review Fellowship Hall
Criteria
the evaluation results of the different 3736 Natural Bridge
page 2 routes being considered and tell us St. Louis, MO 63107
what you think. Presentations at 5:30 & 6:30 p.m.
Public Involvement
Statistics
Three public open houses will be Southside
page 2 held for your convenience. The same Wednesday, Sept. 19, 2007
5:00 p.m. – 7:30 p.m.
information will be available at each
Meramec Elementary School
Map of Proposed meeting, including a presentation to
Alternatives Gymnasium
update you on the latest study 2745 Meramec Street
page 3 information. You will learn the St. Louis, MO 63118
evaluation results and how feedback Presentations at 5:30 & 6:30 p.m.
Next Steps from previous public meetings played
a role. Downtown
page 3 Thursday, Sept. 20, 2007
Come be a part of transit 3:30 p.m. – 6:00 p.m.
Regional Collaboration Center
How to Get improvements for the City of St.
Involved 12th Floor, RCGA
Louis on September 18, 19 or 20.
One Metropolitan Square
page 4 See the schedule on this page for St. Louis, MO 63102
more information. Presentations at 4:00 & 5:00 p.m.

Planning Transit Improvements for St. Louis City Sept. 2007 page 1
Evaluation Criteria Public Involvement Statistics
When considering a preferred alternative for the
Northside-Southside corridor, the study team is guided - More than 1,700 people attended public
by a set of evaluation criteria that comes from the study’s events and gave input
goals and objectives. The team does not consider all - 1,650 people on the mailing list received
differences among the alternatives, but instead focuses newsletters
on a few key differentiators. - More than 130 letters and calls were received
- More than 80 comments e-mailed to
The study team also attempts to identify any factors,
typically called “fatal flaws,” that would make an [email protected]
alternative impossible to implement. For example,
an alternative may have low construction costs and Thank you!
impressive ridership, but if building it would require the
loss of numerous homes and businesses, that would be shared with the Union Pacific freight railroad and in the
considered a fatal flaw and the route could be eliminated I-55 right-of-way. The team measured the impacts of
from the study. each alternative on nearby properties, including houses,
businesses, institutions and parklands.
For the Northside-Southside analysis, the study team
focused on five major evaluation criteria: ridership; CAPITAL COSTS - For each alternative, the study team
development opportunities; right-of-way impacts; capital measured the costs of building the line, including
costs; and public support. construction, track, power systems, signals, stations,
park-and-ride lots and trains and buses. Other major
RIDERSHIP - Attracting a large number of riders to costs associated with building a line were also added,
a new light rail line and the overall transit system is including property acquisition or street improvements
a key goal of any transit project. The study used a where a rail line operates. Annual operating costs were
sophisticated computer model to estimate future ridership developed for all alternatives but were not considered to
based on population and employment forecasts, as well be a major difference among them.
as the operating characteristics of the planned
transit system. The team also considered the likely PUBLIC SUPPORT - No matter how technically strong an
impact on ridership of new development along the rail alternative might be, if there is not support from the
lines and riders attending special events, such as St. public, it is unlikely that an alternative will move forward
Louis Cardinals games. toward implementation. The study included numerous
meetings with neighborhood groups, key stakeholders
DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES - One of the and elected officials. There were also major informational
reasons communities invest in rail transit is to foster meetings in each section of the study area and
new residential and commercial development along informational newsletters were distributed.
the new line. In St. Louis, it is expected that a new line
through Northside and Southside neighborhoods and on The analysis of each of the criteria outlined above, as well
streets downtown would lead to such new development. as feedback from all the public activities, is included in the
alternatives evaluation. The study team will present the
RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPACTS - The study considered rail evaluation results of the detailed alternatives at the final
lines that would run in city streets, in a right-of-way round of public meetings September 18-20, 2007.

Sept. 2007 page 2

Next Steps
After nearly 20 months, the Northside-Southside
Major Transit Improvements Study is nearly
complete. The study team has a few more tasks
and they are outlined below:
* Review public comments from the September
open houses and
* Recommend a preferred MetroLink alternative
to East-West Gateway Council of Governments’
Board of Directors that includes northside,
southside and downtown.

Maps of Proposed Alternatives

The sreening and evaluation results of these
alternatives will be presented at the September
meetings. The locally preferred alternative will be
one route that travels from Goodfellow to Bayless/
I-55.

East-West Gateway’s Board of Directors will

decide whether or not to support the study
team’s recommendation. If it approves the
team’s recommended alternative, then the
complete study report could be sent to the
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to be
considered for federal funding. If the FTA selects
the Northside-Southside alignment for funding,
then an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will
be conducted. The purpose of the EIS is to study
in detail the economic, social and environmental
effects of the proposed alternative and to
evaluate whether there are other alternatives
that could minimize adverse impacts.
Sept. 2007 page 3
 Northside-Southside Study
c/o Vector Communications
701 N. 15th Street, Mailbox 43
St. Louis. MO 63103

Get Involved!
Visit a study information site to review the latest technical
information if you do not have Internet access.
The Reference Desk at these library branches:
Write Us: • Central Library, 1301 Olive Street (63103)
Northside-Southside Study • Cabanne, 1106 Union Blvd. (63113)
c/o Vector Communications • Carondelet, 6800 Michigan Ave. (63111)
701 N. 15th Street, Mailbox 43 • Carpenter, 3309 South Grand Blvd. (63118)
St. Louis, Missouri 63103 • Julia Davis, 4415 Natural Bridge Ave. (63115)
• Kingshighway, 2260 South Vandeventer Ave. (63110)
Call Us: • Walnut Park, 5760 West Florissant Ave. (63120)
314-621-3385
Other locations:
E-Mail Us: Citizens for Modern Transit
[email protected] 911 Washington, Suite 200, 63101
St. Louis Regional Chamber & Growth Association
Visit Our Web Site: One Metropolitan Square, 63102
www.northsouthstudy.org Downtown St. Louis Partnership Inc.
906 Olive, Suite 200, 63101

www.northsouthstudy.org
Potential MetroLink Extension Selected for St. Louis City Dec. 2007, Issue 4

The Board of Directors of the East-West Gateway Council of Governments, our region’s metropolitan planning agency, has approved a
potential MetroLink extension for the City of St. Louis. The board’s vote means that if or when light rail is expanded in the City, this is the
route that should be considered. The approved extension, known in transit planning as a locally preferred alternative, would travel in the
middle of the street as follows:
• From I-70 north near the Goodfellow Avenue exit
south to Natural Bridge;
• East to North Florissant, south on 14th Street into
Downtown;
• East on Convention Plaza, south to 10th Street, west
on Clark, south to 14th Street; and
• West on Chouteau Avenue, exit south onto Jefferson,
to Broadway exit to I-55 right-of-way terminating at
Bayless/I-55.
A separate set of tracks would move passengers, in the
opposite direction, from south to north.

The board’s approval culminates a two-year planning

study sponsored by East-West Gateway, Metro and
the Missouri Department of Transportation called the
“Northside-Southside Transit Improvements Study,” which
examined several potential light rail extensions for north
St. Louis, south St. Louis and downtown. At the study’s
start, with input from elected officials, stakeholders and
the general public, it was determined that an expanded
light rail system in the City was worth pursuing because
it would: encourage economic development, provide
access to opportunity, spur job growth and stabilize
neighborhoods. Armed with this information, the study
team began looking at several potential routes that
would achieve these goals. It started with eight possible
extensions, then through detailed analysis that included
costs, development opportunities, property impacts
and ridership, combined with public input, study team
members narrowed the options down to one. It was this
option that East-West Gateway’s board approved.

Planning Transit Improvements for St. Louis City Dec. 2007 page 1
 Northside-Southside Study
c/o Vector Communications
701 N. 15th Street, Mailbox 43
St. Louis. MO 63103

Public Participation - Key to Study’s Success

What’s Next? Thanks to you, the “Northside-Southside Major Transit Improvements
Even though a new MetroLink Study” had more citizen involvement than any St. Louis area transit study
extension has been approved for in recent history. Furthermore, it far exceeded the federal government’s
requirements for public engagement. During the study:
the City of St. Louis, it does not mean
it will be built in the near future. That’s • Presentations were made to 33 neighborhood groups, business
because currently there is no money organizations, ward groups not once, but several times;
available to expand light rail anywhere • St. Louis Aldermen and other elected officials, especially those wards
in the St. Louis area. Plus, the federal directly involved, were briefed periodically throughout the study;
government requires that in order to • Three rounds of public meetings were held in north St. Louis, south St.
receive federal funding to build a light Louis and downtown at major study milestones;
rail extension, an environmental study • A Technical Advisory Group consisting of well-respected transit officials,
engineers and city officials met six times to provide advice to the study
must be conducted.
team;
The purpose of the Environmental • A Policy Advisory Group composed of neighborhood and community
Impact Study is to analyze in detail the leaders met three times to offer suggestions to the study team;
economic, social and environmental • A telephone hotline, a website with all project information and
effects of the proposed alternative and information sites at area public libraries were established; and
• A project brochure and four newsletters, including this one, were
to evaluate whether there are other
distributed to more than 1,600 households.
alternatives that could minimize
adverse impacts. Local media outlets were also kept informed throughout the study and
several television stations and newspapers reported on project
milestones.
www.northsouthstudy.org
Although there can never be too much public input, the study team thanks
you for your participation. Whenever the next stage of planning begins, we
hope you will be involved.

Thank You!
Dec. 2007 page 2
 Northside-Southside Technical Advisory Committee

First Last Address Stat

Name Name Title Organization Address 1 2 City e Zip Phone Email

Department of
Parks, Recreation 5600 Clayton bessg@stlouis
Gary Bess Director & Forestry Avenue St. Louis MO 63110 289-310 city.com
East-West
Director of Gateway Council One Memorial Suite jerry.blair@ew
Jerry Blair Planning of Government Drive 1600 St. Louis MO 63102 421-4220 gateway.org
Transportation &
Redevelopment
Policy St. Louis County 41 South Tcurran@stloui
Tom Curran Administrator Executive Office Central Avenue St. Louis MO 63105 615-2541 sco.com
Assistant to the Office of the Room 314-622- halek@stlouis
Tim Embree Mayor Mayor City Hall 200 St. Louis MO 63103 3733 city.com
Senior Vice 707 North First rfriem@metro
Ray Friem President Metro Street St. Louis MO 63102 982-1400 stlouis.org

Knobbe, Senior Vice 707 North First sknobbe@met

Steve P.E. President Metro Street St. Louis MO 63102 982-1475 rostlouis.org

121 S. sleonstreeter
Leon- Division Manager, St. Louis County Meramec @stlouisco.co
Stephanie Streeter Highway Planning Highways & Traffic Avenue St. Louis MO 63105 615-8507 m

Melton, St. Louis Board of City Hall, 1200 Room Meltonm@stlo

Marjorie P.E. President Public Service Market Street 305 St. Louis MO 63103 622-4143 uiscity.com
Transportation Missouri Jeanne.Olubog
Planning Department of 1590 Woodlake Chesterfiel [email protected]
Jeanne Olubogun Coordinator Transportation Drive d MO 63017 340-4550 .gov

Deputy Project 707 North First 982-1400 crimsky@metr

Chris Poehler Director Metro Street St. Louis MO 63102 x 1880 ostlouis.org
City of St. Louis
Runde, Commissioner of Department of 1900 Hampton rundes@stloui
Steve P.E. Traffic Streets Avenue St. Louis MO 63139 647-3111 scity.com
 Northside-Southside Technical Advisory Committee

St. Louis Board of City Hall, 1200 Room Jonesbr@stlou

Thomas Shepard Chief of Staff Aldermen Market Street 232 St. Louis MO 63103 589-6804 iscity.com

Director of Planning & Urban 1015 Locust Suite stanleyr@stlo

Rollin Stanley Planning Design Agency Street 1200 St. Louis MO 63101 622-3400 uiscity.com
Transportation Missouri Wesley.Stephe
Planninig Department of 1590 Woodlake Chesterfiel [email protected].
Wesley Stephen Coordinator Transportation Drive d MO 63017 340-4167 gov
Missouri Deanna.Venke
Area Engineer - Department of 6138 Wilson [email protected].
Deanna Venker City of St. Louis Transportation Avenue St. Louis MO 63139 877-0118 gov
St. Louis
Williams, Development 1015 Locust Suite 622-3400 williamsot@stl
Otis P.E. Deputy Director Corporation Street 1200 St. Louis MO 63101 x 269 ouiscity.com
 Northside-Southside Study
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
Wednesday, April 12, 2006
East-West Gateway Council of Governments

TAC Members Present

Gary Bess, Jerry Blair, Donna Day, Ray Friem, Brian Horton, Brandyn Jones, Steve
Knobbe, Stephanie Leon-Streeter, Marjorie Melton, Jeanne Olubogun, Chris Rimsky,
Rollin Stanley, Wesley Stephen, Deanna Venker and Otis Williams

TAC Members Absent

Tom Curran, Kathy Hale and Steve Runde

Team Members Present

Josephine Emerick, Laurna Godwin, Mark Grossenbacher, Paula Hughes, Robert Innis,
Ken Kinney, Rick Nannenga, Russell Volmert

Meeting Purpose
As the initial meeting of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), this meeting served
as a study kick-off to acquaint the members with the following information:
• Planning Context
• Community Engagement Results To-Date
• Purpose and Need
• Preliminary Alternatives
• Next Steps

Introductions
Donna Day, Manager, Transportation Corridor Improvement Group, opened the meeting
by having all meeting participants introduce themselves. Following the TAC member
introductions, Ms. Day reviewed the agenda and explained the purpose of the meeting.

Planning Context
Ms. Day began the presentation by explaining that the Northside-Southside Study is a
continuation of the Major Transportation Investment Analyses (MTIAs) studies
completed in 2000. The MTIAs and Northside-Southside Study are conducted under the
National Environment Policy Act process so that, if the study moves into the
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) phase, the work will become part of that
subsequent phase of the project. Ms. Day explained that the Northside-Southside Study
will update and refine the locally preferred alternatives (LPAs) selected in 2000 within
the City of St. Louis.

Ms. Day advised that the study team will seek technical assistance and advice from the
TAC throughout the study. During the 18-month study, the TAC will meet to review the
work products produced during each task. In addition to the TAC, two other committees
(the Policy Advisory and Resource Agency committees) will provide community input
and review the study process and results, respectively.
Community Engagement Results
Laurna Godwin explained to the TAC the numerous community engagement activities –
the stakeholder briefings that were completed between November and February and the
outreach presentations that began in March. Stakeholder interviews were conducted at
the onset of the study with more than 70 stakeholders representing government and
elected officials, community and business leaders. During the briefings, stakeholders
shared their opinions about:
• Current and Future Economic Development, and Transit-Oriented
Development;
• The Proposed Downtown Alternative;
• Proposed Routes and Alignments;
• The Public Engagement Process;
• Issues with the Current Streets and Roads;
• Ridership; and
• General Support for MetroLink.

Many stakeholders agreed that light rail will enhance development but there was concern
regarding potential negative impacts of “street running” trains on the Northside on small
businesses and residences. Some stakeholders mentioned that light rail should connect to
development projects currently underway such as: Greenways (Chouteau, Dr. King,
Great Rivers and St. Vincent); Loughborough Commons and bikeway; St. Louis
University; and rehabbed multi-family homes along Natural Bridge Road. The medical
complexes, the Southside and the proposed toll on the Mississippi River Bridge were
suggested as ridership generators.

Based on the number of comments and questions, the downtown loop and funding are the
most controversial issues of the study. Not only did stakeholders question the benefits of
the MTIA alternative, but there is also concern about the elimination of downtown
parking and revenue. Stakeholders also requested that the downtown service should
connect entertainment and residential areas.

Stakeholders suggested that the study team consider routes on Grand, Gravois, Chouteau,
Tucker and West Florissant, as well as crossing I-70. Likewise, they expressed concern
about cutting off streets and parking. Although most stakeholders support expanding
MetroLink, they noted that the project needs to be funded at a regional and federal level.
Members of Congress support the study and expressed a willingness to secure funding.

Purpose & Need and Preliminary Alternatives

Ken Kinney discussed the transportation-related problems that were identified through
the scoping process and outlined the subsequent goals and objectives for each of the
corridors. He explained that both the Northside and Southside need transit to access
opportunity and to create sustainable development. In addition, both corridors have
funding constraints. On the Northside, the loss of employment and population in high-
density areas as well as a decrease in personal safety must be addressed.

Northside-Southside Study TAC Meeting #1 Summary

-2-
Mr. Kinney said that the screening criteria used for selection of the LPAs in the MTIAs
will be revised for the purpose of this study. In addition to the community engagement
and stakeholder feedback, the project team considered existing and future conditions, and
the following design issues and standards:
• The location of the I-70 and I-55 Termini;
• Using existing or new structures for the Mill Creek Crossing; and
• The location of the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) alignment connections at
Chouteau.

Other considerations for the development of preliminary alternatives include the

relationship to land-use patterns and general transit-oriented design potential.
Subsequently, there are alignments from the MTIAs that are being re-considered. The
technical team suggests five initial preliminary light rail alternatives:
• Natural Bridge Road (LPA);
• Florissant Avenue;
• Chouteau Avenue/UPRR (LPA);
• Gravois Avenue;
• Grand Boulevard; and
• Bus Rapid Transit/UPRR (LPA).

Rick Nannenga of URS reviewed the aerial maps for the rail alignments, highlighting the
design issues, such as where termini could be put on the Northside and Southside.

Technical Advisory Committee Questions:

• Q: With all the parking garages, do we need another garage?

A: Not contradictory in a sense. Will have enough people using transit where
there won’t be a need for additional parking.
• Q: Northside Aldermen are pushing ahead. Spoke about express buses also. Are
we coming out with a recommendation for which area to complete first?
A: From a technical standpoint and to meet criteria for federal funding, it may
lend to decision to do Northside or Southside development first.
• Q: If we assume we will get 50% federal dollars, where do the non-federal
dollars come from?
A: For the St. Clair line, federal funds were 75% (required a 25% match). There
was a big pot. Now, we should plan on no more than 50%.
• Q: What is street running? Do the trains obey or supersede traffic laws?
A: Signal prioritization for transit is desirable to improve travel times, although
sometimes trains simply obey standard traffic signals.
• Q: Why is Northland the destination as opposed to other activity centers?
A: Florissant Valley Community College was the original destination. Northland
was on the way but came out as an alternate terminus. County has great hope for
redevelopment of that area.
• Q: Natural Bridge/West Florissant are planned bike routes. How do bike routes
impact the consideration of streets?

Northside-Southside Study TAC Meeting #1 Summary

-3-
 A: The planned improvements are in the form of bike lanes, which is only paint
on the road, or can be easily restriped years from now.
• Q: How would new system interface with current Metro system? Would trains
run on current and new lines?
A: The new system would be designed to have convenient transfer opportunities
downtown. Trains would probably not run on both lines.
• Q: Would the new multi-modal center be accessible?
A: It is one of the key destinations being considered during planning.
• Q: Why would you use UPRR right-of-way?
A: Using existing rights-of-way is relatively inexpensive and allow for train to
run at higher speeds. We will work with UPRR on coordination issues.
• Q: How would people reach the casinos?
A: People would take existing Metro service to the casinos.

Technical Advisory Committee Comments:

• Want people, not traffic but do not eliminate downtown parking and revenue.
• St. Louis does not have a parking problem. Market provides parking. Almost
reached the point where we have enough parking.
• Noted - we have enough parking.
• The issue is education – people we serve want a happy medium (parking &
transit).
• New developments provide parking, it is not an issue.
• We should view this process as our best shot at where additional light rail lines
should go if we have the money to build them.
• We need to keep in mind we are addressing future parking issues; we are not
talking about today’s parking situation.
• Gas may cost $3.00 per gallon so the cost of fuel might be an impetus for
commuters to take transit.
• We do not have money to build anything now.
• We have to show what happens beyond the planned terminus on the Northside.
There are millions of dollars of development planned for Riverview. By the time
the preferred alternative is built, (20-30 years) it will be time to redevelop that
area.
• Gravois would be fast and direct, plus there are new vacancies in the area that
could be developed with transit.
• The Chouteau route would provide access to some sites that have dedicated
developments (dedicated developments?). This could be a win-win situation.
• The challenge for Gravois is that the cross streets are on a grid. Gravois could be
complex and we would have to limit left turns. However, Gravois used to have
complexity with the former reversible lanes.
• Gravois was a successful streetcar route in the city.
• The Grand alignment misses many neighborhoods. Grand has heavy traffic
although running on this street would allow connection to SLUH. You could
continue on Grand to Olive to hit both SLUH and HSSU; however, this would
still leave a lot of south city unserved.

Northside-Southside Study TAC Meeting #1 Summary

-4-
 • I assume if you live in the Reavis Barracks area you could come up on the
Metrolink via the railroad ROW to the multimodal center where in 25 years also
might have a regional (i.e., heavy rail/commuter rail) from South City.
• The Southside alternatives will need to cross over I-44 on a bridge or another
structure. As we are replacing bridges we need to think about what is needed to
accommodate light rail track width. City has reduced lanes on Grand south of I-
44. Similarly, MODOT plans to reduce the number of lanes even on the new
Grand bridge at I-44.
• We do not need to consider bus rapid transit on the Northside. It was an option on
the table in the MTIA but the model showed Northside already well-served by
buses.
• Fourteenth Street is ideal for operations, however it is too far away from where
folks want to go within Downtown.
• Need to keep in mind future extensions, for example Cross County in Clayton has
junction failure issues if a branch extension were now built to Westport.
• There is a building for sale at Natural Bridge just south of where the railroad line
heading towards Westport intersects. It might be worth using the railroad ROW
to go northwest.

Next Steps
Ms. Day polled members to determine the best day of the week for TAC meetings as well
as the best method for notification. Members indicated email as the best method for
sending the meeting notice and the preference for meeting dates was Tuesday,
Wednesday or Thursday. In addition, she requested comments by the end of the week.

Adjournment
The meeting concluded at 12:35 p.m.

Northside-Southside Study TAC Meeting #1 Summary

-5-
 Northside-Southside Study
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
Thursday, June 1, 2006
East-West Gateway Council of Governments

TAC Members Present

Jerry Blair, Enola Coffelt-Tullos (for Stephanie Leon-Streeter), Tom Curran, Donna Day,
Kathy Hale, Brian Horton, Brandyn Jones, Jeanne Olubogun, Chris Rimsky, Don Roe
(for Rollin Stanley), Wesley Stephen, Deanna Venker

TAC Members Absent

Gary Bess, Ray Friem, Steve Knobbe, Marjorie Melton, Steve Runde and Otis Williams

Team Members Present

Josephine Emerick, Mark Grossenbacher, Paula Hughes, Robert Innis, Ken Kinney, Rick
Nannenga, Russell Volmert

Meeting Purpose
The second meeting of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) served as an overview
to familiarize members with the following information:
• Community Engagement Results To-Date
• Pre-Screening of Preliminary Alternatives
• Next Steps

Introductions
Donna Day, Manager, Transportation Corridor Improvement Group for East-West
Gateway Council of Governments (EWGCOG) opened the meeting by having all
meeting participants introduce themselves. Following the TAC member introductions,
Ms. Day reviewed the agenda and explained the meeting’s purpose.

Community Engagement Results

Paula Hughes with Vector Communications explained the numerous community
engagement activities, focusing on recent community outreach meetings with
neighborhood associations, ward organizations and other groups. A comprehensive list
of all groups involved was provided to the TAC. In addition, the special briefing to
limited- English speaking residents and the first round of open house meetings were
announced. TAC members also received the first study newsletter.

Preliminary Alternatives Evaluation and Screening

Ken Kinney with HNTB provided an overview of the evaluation framework. Mr. Kinney
explained that decisions would need to meet two perspectives. Locally, the goal is to
recommend a preferred alternative to EWGCOG for inclusion into the long-range plan.
On a federal level, the goal is to select the alternative that can move forward to compete
for capital funding distributed under the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) New
Starts Program for fixed guideway systems. Evaluation criteria to satisfy both
perspectives were reviewed along with the resulting early screening criteria.
Mr. Kinney reviewed maps of the possible initial preliminary light rail alternatives for
Northside and Southside, plus one Bus Rapid Transit alternative on the Southside only:
• Natural Bridge / North Florissant / 14th (LPA);
• West Florissant/ North Florissant/ 14th
• Natural Bridge / Jefferson / Olive;
• Chouteau / UPRR (LPA);
• Gravois / UPRR;
• Chouteau / Grand / UPRR; and
• Bus Rapid Transit / Market/ UPRR (LPA).

Mr. Kinney reviewed the early evaluation of these alternatives against one another,
focusing on ridership and development opportunities. Russ Volmert with HNTB assisted
in the assessment of potential development areas.

All alternatives identified previously as Locally Preferred Alternatives (LPA) in the 2000
Major Transportation Investment Analyses (MTIAs) were again viewed strong across
various factors, indicating that such options should advance to more detailed design and
evaluation. However, newly added alternatives varied in their assessment.

On the Northside, the West Florissant route was clearly weak in its constraints on right-
of-way (narrow through the third ward), ridership and development opportunities (latter
two factors constrained by substantial stretch of abutting cemeteries and parks).
Meanwhile, the Jefferson/ Olive route did serve select activities (A.G. Edwards and West
Loft District), but had questionable development opportunities. General consensus was
that while light-rail can stimulate development, its role as a catalyst needs to be supported
by other investments and local land-use policies. Hence, it was felt that the Natural
Bridge route had more proven promise with recent developments (North Market Place,
Salisbury Place, etc.) than largely vacant property along Jefferson and Parnell. In
summary, the study team suggested that only the Natural Bridge route should probably be
advanced as a detailed alternative, and TAC members agreed .

On the Southside, the assessment proved more difficult, as the factors were much closer
in their tradeoffs. The Gravois alternative served the most transit-dependents and had the
least mileage for directness. However, this route had the least obvious development
opportunities, despite still being close to several strong residential markets (i.e. Benton
Park, Tower Grove East, etc.). Meanwhile, the South Grand route offered the most
development opportunities, but its constrained right-of-way through the Grand South
Grand area poses some serious tradeoffs on train speed, lane capacity and parking. In
summary, the team suggested all rail alternatives on the Southside might be advanced as
detailed alternatives, and TAC members agreed.

Mr. Kinney then reviewed maps of Downtown concepts and alternatives. Three basic
concepts explored were straight through on one street (14th or Tucker), a couplet or pair
of one-way streets (multiple options one-block apart) and loop (again, a wide array of
street combinations). Upon evaluation, the only strength to straight through options is

Northside-Southside Study TAC Meeting #2 Summary

-2-
speed which is good for operations, but fails in comparison on proximity to destinations
and is bad for ridership. Although loops can offer the best proximity, these concepts
generally fail in directness and speed. Thus, couplets appear to best balance operations
and ridership. Upon consideration of various streets and concepts, and key downtown
stakeholder input via a special workshop, two downtown alternatives may be
recommended for further study. The first is a north-south couplet (paired one-way
streets), while the second is an east-west, compact, clockwise loop. Both alternatives
enter and exit Downtown from 14th street from both the Northside and Southside.
• 14th – Clark – 9th/10th (one-way pair) – Convention Plaza – 14th
• 14th – Olive – 6th – Chestnut (contraflow) – 14th

Technical Advisory Committee Questions:

• Q: How is Metro involved at Open Houses?

A: Metro representative(s) will attend to address safety and operations inquiries.
• Q: Are aldermen aware of alternatives? Any “red flags?”
A: All aldermen along alternatives are aware of streets being considered; many
have voiced support for one alternative over another.
• Q: What is the rationale for running along the cemetery?
• A: We reassessed that alignment at the request of several stakeholders, including
aldermen. As noted above, partly because of the bordering cemeteries and park
the alignment has somewhat limited ridership and development potential.
 Q: Why do you want to run in the streets?
• A: Experience in other US cities indicates that street-running rail transit is more
likely to enhance development opportunities, which is one of the key objectives of
the study. In addition, there are few existing rights-of-way that are in suitable
locations. Although there are operational and traffic-impact concerns related to
street running we will use the experience of other systems to address them.
• Q: What are Union Pacific’s design standards on vertical separation?
A: Just met with UP representatives. UP requirements are unknown at this point.
Southside alternatives run alongside a much less active line than the BNSF
alternative in the Metro South Study.
• Q: Is there enough space to run in the right-of-way?
A: Yes, there is enough space in places where there is approximately 100 feet.
• Q: Is it feasible?
A: Not really a question of feasibility. Typically, it is a policy decision.
• Q: Is there a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) alternative for the Northside?
A: The BRT alternative is carried over from the previous study. There was not a
lot of BRT ridership on the northside when it was studied. The railroads are
against BRT running in their right-of-way for liability reasons.
• Q: How much acreage is needed for a light rail maintenance facility?
A: There is no standard. Three acres were identified in the previous study.
• Q: If needing land for a maintenance facility, then it is not available for other
land use? How do you spur development along the line?
A: That is correct, we do not want to build a facility like the Delmar bus facility.

Northside-Southside Study TAC Meeting #2 Summary

-3-
 • Q: When employment and population are linked together, how do you
compensate for both?
A: Once we get beyond the initial screening, we will work with city officials to
develop a detailed plan. If and when we go to FTA, we will have looked at what
is there now, what’s planned and what has happened over 20-30 years. We will
have a hard sell if we say nothing is happening in the area right now.
• Q: The Pruitt-Igo area is the largest vacant area in the City. This is an opportunity
area that the city owns. How does the Natural Bridge alternative help that area?
A: It is a healthy walk from Pruitt-Igo to North Florissant. The current
development is to the east of Pruitt-Igo. This route will sustain development near
North Market and Murphy Park.
• Q: What are the connectivity issues for a north-south route?
A: The destination of both corridors is downtown. We realize that sharp turns
affect speed and will try to have as few turns as possible considering the need to
serve downtown destinations. One of the difficult issues is to serve the shorter
distance market and the longer distance market on the same route.
• Q: What is the turning radius downtown? Will it encroach on existing
development?
A: Standard light rail vehicles can make the kinds of turns required in the
downtown area.
• Q: How many alternatives are moving forward?
A: After reviewing all of the alternatives, we will likely move forward with six.
There will be opportunities to make changes depending on what the public says at
the public meetings June 13 - 15.

Technical Advisory Committee Comments:

• Break out population and employment concentrations as separate factors.
• Directness and proximity appear to conflict with each other as measures.
• Try to educate the public on street running. The word is spreading. Do not use the
word “streetcar” because many are thinking that we are doing the same as being
proposed in the Delmar Loop.
• Brief aldermen of status of alternatives between now and public open houses.

Next Steps
Ms. Day shared the upcoming Open House meetings June 13-15. Brian Horton stressed
that while the team had shared technical factors with the TAC today, the additional factor
of public support would be better known following the open houses. If in the event any
major outcry by City officials or the general public came to light, then the range of
alternatives being advanced could change to reflect public input. Ms. Day then wrapped
up detailing how the team would begin detailed evaluation and design over the summer,
with the next TAC meeting possibly in August.

Adjournment
The meeting concluded at 3:15 p.m.

Northside-Southside Study TAC Meeting #2 Summary

-4-
 Northside-Southside Study
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
Thursday, August 10, 2006, 10 a.m.
East-West Gateway Council of Governments

TAC Members Present

Tom Curran, Donna Day, Ray Friem, Kathy Hale, Brian Horton, Brandyn Jones,
Stephanie Leon-Streeter, Jeanne Olubogun, Chris Rimsky, Steve Runde, Tom Shrout,
Rollin Stanley, Wesley Stephen, Les Sterman (for Jerry Blair), Deanna Venker

TAC Members Absent

Gary Bess, Steve Knobbe, Marjorie Melton, and Otis Williams

Team Members Present

Josephine Emerick, Laurna Godwin, Mark Grossenbacher, Paula Hughes, Robert Innis,
Ken Kinney, Rick Nannenga, Russell Volmert

Meeting Purpose
The third meeting of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) covered the following
information:
• Community Engagement Results To-Date
• Other Advisory Committees
• Final Alternatives
• Next Steps

Introductions
Donna Day, TCIG Manager, East-West Gateway, opened the meeting by welcoming new
faces. Following the TAC member introductions, Ms. Day reviewed the agenda and
explained the meeting’s purpose.

Community Engagement Results

Paula Hughes with Vector Communications summarized the numerous community
engagement activities that have taken place to-date. In the future, more outreach
meetings are scheduled, and aldermen along final alternatives will be revisited.

Ms. Day reviewed the meetings held to-date and roles of other committees, including the
Policy Advisory and Resource Agency Committees. A copy of the RAC membership
was shared (PAC contacts were previously shared).

Final Alternatives
Ken Kinney, Project Manager, HNTB, summarized the final alternatives moving forward
to evaluation, with emphasis on changes on the Southside.

Mr. Kinney reviewed maps of the original preliminary alternatives, plus one new rail
alternative on the Southside:
• Natural Bridge / North Florissant / 14th (LPA);
 • West Florissant/ North Florissant/ 14th;
• Natural Bridge / Jefferson / Olive;
• Chouteau / UPRR (LPA);
• Gravois / UPRR;
• Chouteau / Grand / UPRR;
• Jefferson / I-55 (completely new from last meeting); and
• Bus Rapid Transit / Market/ UPRR (LPA).

Mr. Kinney reviewed the screening of these alternatives, noting which alternatives would
move forward into conceptual engineering and evaluation:
• Natural Bridge / North Florissant / 14th (LPA);
• Chouteau / UPRR (LPA);
• Gravois / UPRR;
• Jefferson / I-55;
• New Bus Rapid Transit alternative (to be developed)

On the Northside, very little changed during the evaluation process. The Florissant
Avenue alternative has low development opportunities and potential for little ridership.
Unlike Florissant, the Natural Bridge/Jefferson alternative serves some employment and
residential centers; however, the alignment misses some of the more recent development
east of Parnell. These two alignments were eliminated from further consideration.

On the Southside, three of the rail alternatives and one busway alternative were impacted
by Union Pacific Rail Road’s (UPRR) position on sharing of the rights-of-way. UPRR’s
requirements for shared use of its right-of-way could result in impacts to numerous
adjacent properties.

While having strong development and destinations, the Grand alternative was eliminated
due to physical constraints south of Arsenal. Additionally, in light of expanded UPRR
design requirements, team members sought out a new Southside rail alternative with
strong development yet separate from the UPRR right-of-way, and found such in a new
Jefferson / I-55 alternative. Like Grand, Jefferson has transit-supportive land uses and
strong development opportunities. Unlike Grand, however, Jefferson is more direct and
has far fewer physical impacts. In summary, the study team recommended that Jefferson
be retained for evaluation in place of Grand as a Southside rail alternative.

As for Bus Rapid Transit, Union Pacific is opposed to any new roadway alongside their
tracks. Also, since the 2000 studies, federally funded BRT projects have become more
“enhanced bus” projects, or BRT lines running on existing streets, as opposed to a new
“guideway,” like that planned in 2000. As a result, the study team will develop a new
BRT alternative that runs on existing streets, like Gravois, as a more realistic BRT
alternative to evaluate and compare with rail alternatives.

Northside-Southside Study TAC Meeting #3 Summary

-2-
Engineering Issues
Rick Nannenga, Engineering Task Leader, URS, shared how a key task will be reviewing
critical design areas along the alternatives. Mr. Nannenga reviewed the area surrounding
the Multi-Modal Center as one example. Shared drawings showed the tight squeeze
between existing I-64 ramps on Clark and 14th Streets. The team desires a solution that
will have close proximity of a new at-grade station to the existing below-grade Civic
Center station, while avoiding or mitigating impacts to the existing triangle park,
MetroBus loop, I-64 ramps, 14th Street capacity, Clark Street parking, and City Hall
access. Other examples of critical design areas include the terminus station near
Goodfellow/I-70, Jefferson under I-44, and making the transition from Chouteau to the
UPRR.

Technical Advisory Committee Questions:

• Q: Are you finding political opposition?

• A: We are looking at all the concerns. We are briefing the alderman making sure
they are aware of any new developments. The concerns on the south are about
impacting ridership on the Grand route.
• Q: Is the Union Pacific Rail Road design requirement based on regulation or a
standard applied across the country?
• A: There is not a requirement. In other cities they co-exist.
• Q: Are there traffic criteria for grade separation?
A: Intersection traffic volumes will be documented; Very few intersections
suspected to rival volume of Skinker on Cross County extension.
• Q: What are the development opportunities along Jefferson?
A: Opportunity for larger sites along I-55 at Loughborough and at South
Broadway (Big Lots), plus urban infill along Jefferson, like planned
storefronts/condos across from Benton Park at Arsenal, or similar mixed use
developments on corners of Lafayette.
• Q: What does City Hall think of changing access and parking on Clark?
• A: Will work with City Treasurer’s office. Maybe move lane reduction of
Tucker now at Spruce to one block north at Clark in order to provide new angle
parking on Tucker in front of Police Headquarters.
 Q: How do you go from Broadway to I-55?
• A: Conceptually vacate a little-used, one-block street (Piedmont) south of
Gasconade to make a straight, at-grade transition from South Broadway to
MODOT right-of-way.
• Q: If going to Bayless/I-55, is team aware of proposed Weber/I-55 interchange
improvements and Pace Properties development?
• A: Will work with Tom Curran to learn more on Weber.

Adjournment
The meeting concluded at 11:15 a.m.

Northside-Southside Study TAC Meeting #3 Summary

-3-
 Northside-Southside Policy Advisory Committee

1st Name Last Name Title Organization Address 1 Add. 2 City ST Zip Email Phone
Jennifer Bess Gravois Business 5815 Eichelberger St. Louis MO 63109 314-352-0141
Association
Kathleen Brady VP Facility & Civic St. Louis University 221 North Grand Room St. Louis MO 63103 [email protected] 314-977-8173
Affairs Blvd 211
Paul Brockmann Director of General Missouri Botanical P.O. Box 299 St. Louis MO 63166 [email protected] 314-577-5129
Services Garden
John Burse Old North St. Louis 1408 Herbert St. Louis MO 63107 [email protected] or 314-241-5031
Restoration Group [email protected]

Jim Cloar President & CEO Downtown St. Louis 906 Olive Suite St. Louis MO 63101 [email protected] 314-231-7272
Partnership 200
Mike Collins President Tyco Mallinckrodt 675 McDonnell St. Louis MO 63042 [email protected]
Blvd m
David Fisher Executive Director Great Rivers 1000 St. Louis Suite St. Louis MO 63103 [email protected]
Greenway District Union Station 102
Barbara Geisman Deputy Mayor City of St. Louis 1200 Market 200 St. Louis MO 63103 [email protected] 314-622-4792
Street City
Hall

Missouri Department 1590 Woodlake

Ed Hassinger District Engineer of Transportation Drive Chesterfield MO 63017 [email protected]
Stephanie Henderson 1st Ward P.O. Box 150283 St. Louis MO 63115 [email protected] 314-497-3878

Mike Jones Executive Assistant County Executive's St. Louis County 41 S. St. Louis MO 63105 [email protected]
Office / St. Louis Executive's Office Central
County Ave.
Rev. Doug Parham St. Louis Clergy 12105 Old Halls Florissant MO 63033
Coalition / Ferry Road
Community Church of
God
Linda Primer 3rd Ward 2139 East Fair St. Louis MO 63107 314-583-5140
Norah Ryan President Tower Grove East 3504A Juniata St. Louis MO 63118 [email protected] 314-776-8432
Neighborhood
Association
707 North First
Larry Salci President & CEO Metro Street St. Louis MO 63102 [email protected] 314-982-1588
 Northside-Southside Policy Advisory Committee

Jerry Schlichter Schlichter, Bogard 100 South Fourth Suite St. Louis MO 63102 [email protected] 314-621-6115
and Denton Street 900
Tom Shrout Executive Director Citizens for Modern 911 Washington Suite St. Louis MO 63102 [email protected] 314-231-7272
Transit 200
Ernest Smoot 21st Ward 4219 Athlone St. Louis MO 63115 [email protected] 314-389-7769
Les Sterman Executive Director East-West Gateway Gateway Tower, Ste St. Louis MO 63102 [email protected] 314-421-4220
Council of One Memorial 1600
Governments Drive
Ralph Tidwell Federation of Block 4643 Penrose St. Louis MO 63115 314-383-2754
Units
Lenly Weathers Carondelet 313 Iron St. Louis MO 63111 NO EMAIL 314-351-7274
Community
Betterment
Federation
 Northside-Southside Transit Improvements Study
Policy Advisory Committee Meeting
Thursday, May 4, 2006 at 4:00 p.m.
East-West Gateway Council of Governments Board Room

PAC Members Present

Paul Brockmann, John Burse, Jim Cloar, Mike Collins, David Fisher, Barbara Geisman,
Ed Hassinger, Stephanie Henderson, Mike Jones, Norah Ryan, Jerry Schlichter, Ernest
Smoot, Les Sterman, Ralph Tidwell, Lenley Weathers

PAC Members Absent

Jennifer Bess, Kathleen Brady, Rev. Doug Parham, Linda Primer, Larry Salci, Tom
Shrout

Team Members Present

Donna Day, Laurna Godwin, Mark Grossenbacher, Brian Horton, Paula Hughes, Robert
Innis, Ken Kinney, Rick Nannenga, Chris Rimsky, Russell Volmert

Introductions
Donna Day, Manager, Transportation Corridor Improvement Group, opened the meeting
by having all meeting participants introduce themselves. Following the PAC member
introductions, Ms. Day reviewed the agenda and explained that the purpose of the initial
meeting is to review:
• Planning Context
• Community Engagement Results To-Date
• Purpose and Need
• Preliminary Alternatives
• Next Steps

Planning Context
Ms. Day said that the Northside-Southside Study is a continuation of the Major
Transportation Investment Analyses (MTIAs) completed in 2000. The MTIAs and
Northside-Southside Study are conducted under National Environmental Policy Act’s
process so that, if the study moves into the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) phase,
the work can become a part of that phase of the project. This will ensure that the
evaluation of the impacts for the selected alternatives meet the Federal Transit
Administration’s New Starts criteria. Ms. Day explained that the Northside-Southside
Study would update and refine the locally preferred alternatives (LPAs) selected in 2000,
although only for sections of the alignments within the City of St. Louis.

Ms. Day said that the PAC, a representative body with local civic knowledge, is expected
to provide policy assistance throughout the study. During the 18-month study, the PAC
will meet to review the study documents produced at key milestones. Additionally, with
its collective community connections, the PAC will assist the study team by informing
citizens about public feedback opportunities. The PAC members were advised that there
are two other committees (Technical Advisory and Resource Agency) that provide
technical input and review the study process and results.

Community Engagement Results

Laurna Godwin of Vector Communications said that prior to the study committee’s first
meeting numerous community engagement activities were completed. At the onset of the
study, more than 70 stakeholder interviews were conducted with individuals in the study
area, including government officials, and community and business leaders. During the
briefings, stakeholders shared their opinions about:
• Current and future economic development and transit-oriented development;
• The proposed downtown alternative;
• Possible alignments;
• The public engagement process;
• Issues with current streets and roads;
• Ridership; and
• General support for MetroLink.

In summarizing the stakeholder comments, Ms. Godwin cited stakeholder support for the
study its goals and citizens’ involvement. While most stakeholders agreed that light rail
would enhance development, there were some concerns expressed regarding the impact
on northside neighborhoods. Stakeholders suggested that alignments along West
Florissant, Grand, and Gravois be considered, in addition to consideration for crossing I-
70. Many stakeholders expressed concerns regarding funding, noting that there are not
local funds available and that the project needs to be funded at both a regional and federal
level. Some stakeholders also expressed equity concerns in terms of buses versus light
rail and the belief that street-running transit is inferior to below-grade alignments.

Study Scope and Status Report

Ken Kinney of HNTB provided a status report for the study noting that input from the
stakeholder briefings as well as changes of existing and future conditions resulted in the
addition of preliminary alternatives to the LPAs from the MTIAs.

Purpose & Need

Mr. Kinney discussed the transportation-related problems that were identified through the
assessment of existing and future conditions explaining that the goal is to ensure that the
transit alternatives developed are in the context of the identified problems. On both the
Northside and Southside, Mr. Kinney said that transit could address the need to create
sustainable development for such areas as downtown, the near Northside, the Chouteau
Corridor and the Garden District on the Southside, as well as possibly on South Grand
Boulevard and Gravois. The Central West End, Delmar Loop, Civic Center and Emerson
Park were presented as current examples of coordinated transit and policy investments.

Mr. Kinney also discussed how transit could address the need for access to opportunity
including issues such as the mismatch of jobs and workers; lengthening travel times; and
the lack of alternate transportation choices. He discussed an opportunity for a transit and
community investment program such as the Bridges to Work program sponsored by East-

Northside-Southside Study PAC Meeting #1 Summary

-2-
West Gateway. Mr. Kinney also touched on constraints due to operating and capital
funding, explaining that federal funding needs to be supported by local funds.

Mr. Kinney reviewed the screening criteria that will be used for selecting LPAs for the
Northside and Southside, which differ from the criteria used for the downtown
alternative. He noted that the criteria would consider both current conditions as well as
projected conditions in 2030.

Other considerations for the development of preliminary alternatives include the

relationship to land-use patterns and transit-oriented development (TOD) potential. Mr.
Kinney reviewed five conceptual light rail alternatives in North and South St. Louis:
• Natural Bridge Avenue (LPA);
• Florissant Avenue;
• Chouteau Avenue/UP;
• Gravois Avenue/UP;
• Chouteau/Grand Boulevard/UP; and,
• Bus Rapid Transit/Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR.)

For the downtown area, numerous alternatives to the downtown loop recommended in the
MTIAs were reviewed.

After reviewing alignments for the Northside and Southside, the following design and
other issues were discussed:
• The location of the I-70 and I-55 termini;
• Using existing or new structures for the Mill Creek Crossing;
• The location of the (UPRR) alignment connections at Chouteau;
• Existing MetroLink;
• TOD; and
• Street running.

Policy Advisory Committee Questions:

• Q: Are the planning documents from studies completed in 1999 and 2000 on the
website?
A: The documents are located on the EWGCOG website under
Northside/Southside Summary Documents – Final Evaluation Report. They can
also be found on the Northside-Southside study web site on the “Links” page
under “MTIAs.”
• Q: The alternatives do not go very far north. Is this because there is not enough
density in that area?
A: Study area is only within City of St. Louis.
• Q: Aren’t most people driving to access transit?
A: Yes, a lot of people will drive to a park-and-ride lot. They will also walk and
bike to transit.
• Q: Aren’t there a number of railroad lines following a similar path of the
alternatives?

Northside-Southside Study PAC Meeting #1 Summary

-3-
 A: Existing rail lines are attractive and that is why the initial MetroLink line was
built on them. It was relatively inexpensive impacts were minimal.
Unfortunately, there are very few that are located in the right places.
• Q: How many miles is it from downtown to I-70?
A: It is approximately eight miles.
• Q: How does the proposed cost for rail compare to the ballpark or the Cross
County line (i.e., cost per mile)?
A: The first line was $19 million per mile. The Cross County line approaches
$80 million a mile, partly because of grade separations. The rule of thumb is if
you build above the surface (i.e., elevated) the cost increases 2 to 3 times per
mile. If you build underground, the cost goes up 10 times per mile.
• Q: St. Louis has existing tunnels. Why can’t these be used?
A: There are tunnels under 8th Street and Washington Avenue, which are part of
the initial MetroLink line. The only other existing tunnel is under Tucker. This
tunnel is badly deteriorated and not suitable for transit use.
• Q: What were the screening criteria for the MTIA in 2000?
A: During the selection process for the MTIA in 2000, the study team looked at
ridership, right-of-way impacts, development potential, and grades.
• Q: Did the Florissant alignment have fewer riders when it was evaluated for the
MTIA 2000?
A: Yes, ridership was lower partly because it runs along two large cemeteries and
a major park.
• Q: Is the railroad line near Chouteau abandoned?
• A: No, Amtrak has two trains and Union Pacific runs freight trains on that track.
We propose to put in two new tracks in the right-of-way and share the space.
• Q: Would this require any demolition?
A: No
• Q: Would demolition be required where we connect to the Union Pacific right-of-
way?
A: Possibly. We are currently evaluating alternatives at that location.
• Q: Why isn’t it feasible to use the railroad tracks in the Mill Creek area?
A: It is physically feasible to stay on the rights-of-way and go through Mill Creek
Valley. It would be the faster alternative because it would not stop at all but it
also would not tap into the new developments.
• Q: Would the Gravois alignment provide access for residents to the east who do
not have cars?
A: Yes.
• Q: There is a substantial amount of development on Gravois and the street is not
that wide, is this really an option?
A: We will look at the traffic and the impact of traffic slowing down transit. Yes,
it is problematic. There is also the issue of the complex intersection of
north/south streets.
• Q: Is our signal system suitable for street running?
A: Yes, although there could be improvements to improve light rail speed.
• Q: If the Grand bus route is Metro’s most successful bus line, why spend a lot of
money to replace it with a light rail line?

Northside-Southside Study PAC Meeting #1 Summary

-4-
 A: This successful line could spur additional development. It is believed that a
heavily traveled route is a good candidate for a higher capacity vehicle.
• Q: I would argue there is a strong case for the Grand route due to the difficulty in
the city traveling from north to south. If this were the north/south route couldn’t a
passenger travel from one end of town to the other making connections east and
west?
A: We will focus on major markets, the most important of which is downtown St.
Louis, not necessarily designing lines that go north and south.
• Q: Has any consideration been given to the streetcar rails that already exist?
A: The old streetcar rails are not usable.
• Q: Does the signal system have to be synchronized for street running?
A: We can either use signal pre-emption or prioritization.
• Q: Are you considering connecting with the existing MetroLink?
A: Yes. There will be opportunities for, passengers to transfer between systems.
• Q: Must the proposed alignments be within the City of St. Louis?
A: The funding for the study requires that the study area be within the city.
However, we can go beyond the city boundaries if it is necessary to do so to find a
suitable site for a park-and-ride lot at a terminal station.
• Q: When do we evaluate funding feasibility? Where do you get non-federal
dollars? What is the priority and how will this stack against the bridge project
and Highway 40 projects?
A: The funding is largely separate. Typically, the highway dollars are spent
outside of St. Louis and transit is in the core of the city. The East-West Gateway
Council of Government officials determine how these stack up against one
another.
• Q: Isn’t the UP right-of-way largely “invisible” to potential riders?
A: The Union Pacific railroad is industrial, but there is a lot of residential in the
area. The alternative had satisfactory ridership numbers in the previous study.
• Q: There is a lot of development going on Grand, would anything have to be torn
down for the South Grand alternative?
A: No.
• Q: Are you looking at parking and the traffic flow on Grand?
A: Traffic and parking are both serious issues on Grand.
• Q: Have you met with the aldermen?
A: Yes.
• Q: The Union Pacific railroad west of Grand is not used very often and there are
a lot of residences in the area. It seems like this would be one of the most feasible
operations, correct?
A: It was preferred in the MTIA 2000 because of those reasons.
• Q: You have spoken with the City. How do you get support from the County?
A: This study focuses on St. Louis City but the Metro routes extend into the
County. When you consider the Metro South Study, your point is well taken.
• Q: What criteria are used to determine ridership resulting from transit-oriented
development?
A: Riders generated in a half-mile radius around the development.
• Q: Have you looked at the City’s re-development plan?

Northside-Southside Study PAC Meeting #1 Summary

-5-
 A: Yes

Policy Advisory Committee Comments:

• Mary Nelson was a guest speaker at the SLACO conference in March. She said a
small, non-profit (Bethel New Life Center) redeveloped an area in Chicago
around a bus stop – it was the ultimate development initiative. Having transit can
enhance an area a lot.
• MetroLink does not take us to some of the City’s best attractions.
• Young people are attracted to diversity, action, a walk-friendly environment and
transit. If we want to attract young people to St. Louis we have to offer these
things.
• In the past, it has looked like big institutions have thrown their weight around.
The perception is not balanced. The [transit] decisions have created cynicism.
• In the past, there would be a public hearing after the engineers did their work in a
vacuum. We want you to reach out to community groups. This is a community
driven process. You are influential within your group. We need the PAC to
reflect community views and build public support. Otherwise, this will just be a
plan without community support.

Next Steps
Mr. Kinney discussed the next steps including:
• Conceptual downtown alignments;
• Critical design options;
• Preliminary analysis and screening;
• Detailed definition of alternatives; and,
• Key meetings.

Ms. Day concluded the meeting by polling members regarding the best meeting day. The
group requested that meeting not be held on Fridays or days when there is a Cardinals
game.

Adjournment
The meeting concluded at 6:15 p.m.

Northside-Southside Study PAC Meeting #1 Summary

-6-
 Northside-Southside Study
Policy Advisory Committee Meeting
Thursday, August 31, 2006, 4:00 p.m.
East-West Gateway Council of Governments

PAC Members Present

Tom Curran, Donna Day, Ray Friem, Kathy Hale, Brian Horton, Brandyn Jones,
Stephanie Leon-Streeter, Jeanne Olubogun, Chris Rimsky, Steve Runde, Tom Shrout,
Rollin Stanley, Wesley Stephen, Les Sterman (for Jerry Blair), Deanna Venker

PAC Members Absent

Gary Bess, Steve Knobbe, Marjorie Melton, and Otis Williams

Team Members Present

Josephine Emerick, Laurna Godwin, Mark Grossenbacher, Paula Hughes, Robert Innis,
Ken Kinney, Rick Nannenga, Russell Volmert

Meeting Purpose
The third meeting of the Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) covered the following
information:
• Community Engagement Results To-Date
• Other Advisory Committees
• Final Alternatives
• Next Steps

Introductions
Donna Day, TCIG Manager, East-West Gateway, opened the meeting by welcoming new
faces. Following the PAC member introductions, Ms. Day reviewed the agenda and
explained the meeting’s purpose.

Community Engagement Results

Paula Hughes with Vector Communications, summarized the numerous community
engagement activities that have taken place to-date. In the future, more outreach
meetings are scheduled, and aldermen along final alternatives will be revisited.

Ms. Day reviewed the meetings held to-date and roles of other committees, including the
Technical Advisory and Resource Agency Committees.

Final Alternatives
Ken Kinney, Project Manager, HNTB, summarized the final alternatives moving forward
to evaluation, with emphasis on changes on the Southside.

Mr. Kinney reviewed maps of the original preliminary alternatives, plus one new rail
alternative on the Southside:
• Natural Bridge / North Florissant / 14th (LPA);
• West Florissant/ North Florissant/ 14th
 • Natural Bridge / Jefferson / Olive;
• Chouteau / UPRR (LPA);
• Gravois / UPRR;
• Chouteau / Grand / UPRR;
• Jefferson / I-55 (completely new from last meeting); and
• Bus Rapid Transit / Market/ UPRR (LPA).

Mr. Kinney reviewed the screening of these alternatives, noting which alternatives would
move forward into conceptual engineering and evaluation:
• Natural Bridge / North Florissant / 14th (LPA);
• Chouteau / UPRR (LPA);
• Gravois / UPRR;
• Jefferson / I-55;
• New Bus Rapid Transit alternative (to be developed)

On the Northside, very little changed during the evaluation process. The Florissant
Avenue alternative has low development opportunities and potential for little ridership.
Unlike Florissant, the Natural Bridge/Jefferson alternative serves some employment and
residential centers; however, the alignment misses some of the more recent development
east of Parnell. These two alignments were eliminated from further consideration.

On the Southside, three of the rail alternatives and one busway alternative were impacted
by Union Pacific Rail Road’s (UPRR) position on sharing of the rights-of-way. UPRR’s
requirements for shared use of its right-of-way could result in impacts to numerous
adjacent properties.

While having strong development and destinations, the Grand alternative was eliminated
due to physical constraints south of Arsenal. Additionally, in light of expanded UPRR
design requirements, team members sought out a new Southside rail alternative with
strong development yet separate from the UPRR right-of-way, and found such in a new
Jefferson / I-55 alternative. Like Grand, Jefferson has transit-supportive land uses and
strong development opportunities. Unlike Grand, however, Jefferson is more direct and
has far fewer physical impacts. In summary, the study team recommended that Jefferson
be retained for evaluation in place of Grand as a Southside rail alternative.

As for Bus Rapid Transit, Union Pacific is opposed to any new roadway alongside their
tracks. Also, since the 2000 studies, federally funded BRT projects have become more
“enhanced bus” projects, or BRT lines running on existing streets, as opposed to a new
“guideway,” like that planned in 2000. As a result, the study team will develop a new
BRT alternative that runs on existing streets, like Gravois, as a more realistic BRT
alternative to evaluate and compare with rail alternatives.

Northside-Southside Study PAC Meeting #1 Summary

-2-
Engineering Issues
Rick Nannenga, Engineering Task Leader, URS, shared how a key task will be reviewing
critical design areas along the alternatives. Mr. Nannenga reviewed the area surrounding
the Multi-Modal Center as one example. Shared drawings showed the tight squeeze
between existing I-64 ramps on Clark and 14th Streets. The team desires a solution that
will have close proximity of a new at-grade station to the existing below-grade Civic
Center station, while avoiding or mitigating impacts to the existing triangle park,
MetroBus loop, I-64 ramps, 14th Street capacity, Clark Street parking, and City Hall
access. Other examples of critical design areas include the terminus station near
Goodfellow/I-70, Jefferson under I-44, and making the transition from Chouteau to the
UPRR.

Policy Advisory Committee Questions:

• Q: Are you finding political opposition?

• A: We are looking at all the concerns. We are briefing the alderman making sure
they are aware of any new developments. The concerns on the south are about
impacting ridership on the Grand route.
• Q: Is the Union Pacific Rail Road design requirement based on regulation or a
standard applied across the country?
• A: There is not a requirement. In other cities they co-exist.
• Q: Are there traffic criteria for grade separation?
A: Intersection traffic volumes will be documented; Very few intersections
suspected to rival volume of Skinker on Cross County extension.
• Q: What are the development opportunities along Jefferson?
A: Opportunity for larger sites along I-55 at Loughborough and at South
Broadway (Big Lots), plus urban infill along Jefferson, like planned
storefronts/condos across from Benton Park at Arsenal, or similar mixed use
developments on corners of Lafayette.
• Q: What does City Hall think of changing access and parking on Clark?
• A: Will work with City Treasurer’s office. Maybe move lane reduction of
Tucker now at Spruce to one block north at Clark in order to provide new angle
parking on Tucker in front of Police Headquarters.
 Q: How do you go from Broadway to I-55?
• A: Conceptually vacate a little-used, one-block street (Piedmont) south of
Gasconade to make a straight, at-grade transition from South Broadway to
MODOT right-of-way.
• Q: If going to Bayless/I-55, is team aware of proposed Weber/I-55 interchange
improvements and Pace Properties development?
• A: Will work with Tom Curran to learn more on Weber.

Adjournment
The meeting concluded at 5:30 p.m.

Northside-Southside Study PAC Meeting #1 Summary

-3-
 

Title FirstName LastName JobTitle Agency WorkPhone E-mail

Ms. Jane Beetem Director’s Office MoDNR 573-522-2401 
Mr. Steve Billings Manager, Transit Section MoDOT 573-751-2523 
Mr. Nick Chevance Midwest Region Office NPS 402-661-1736 
Mr. Joe Cothern NEPA Compliance EPA 913-551-7148 
Ms. Donna Day Manager, TCIG E-W Gateway 314-421-4220 
Mr. Rick Hansen Biologist US F&WS 573-234-2132  !
Mr. Brian Horton Study Coordinator, TCIG E-W Gateway 314-421-4220 
Ms. Kim Johnson Planning & Development EPA 913-551-7975  
Mr. Jon Knodel Environmental Engineer EPA 913-551-7148 
Mr. Bob Kraus Railroad Safety MoDOT 573-751-7124  
Mr. Mark Kross Environmental Process and Policy MoDOT 573-751-4606   
Mr. Ward Lenz Missouri Team Leader USACE 314-331-8186 "#$
Mr. Bradley McMahon Community Planner FHWA 573-638-2608 !
Mr. Sam Noe Operations Specialist FRA 404-562-3817 !
Ms. Mary Ridgeway Environmental Review FHWA 573-636-2616 !
Mr. Chris Rimsky TCIG Coordinator, Metro Metro 314-982-1400  
Mrs. Joan Roeseler Dir., Planning & Program Dev't FTA 816-329-3936 !
Mr. Wesley Stephen TCIG Coordinator, MoDOT MoDOT 314-340-4167 
Ms. Janet Sternburg Policy Coordinator MoConserv 573-751-4115 
Mr. Darrell Tisor Regional Administrator FRA 816-329-3840 !
Mr. Brian Weiler Director, Multi-Modal Operations MoDOT 573-751-7475 
 Northside-Southside Study
Resource Agency Committee Meeting
Monday, June 26, 2006, 1:00 p.m.
Missouri Department of Transportation, Jefferson City, MO

RAC Members Present

Jane Beetem (MoDNR), Steve Billings (MoDOT), Donny Hamilton (FHWA), Kim
Johnson (EPA, in place of Jon Knodel), Bob Kraus (MoDOT), Mark Kross (MoDOT),
Brad McMahon (FHWA), Sam Noe (FRA, in place of Daryl Tisor), Joan Roeseler (FTA
via phone), Brian Weiler (MoDOT)

RAC Members Absent

Nick Chevarnce (NPS), Joe Cothern (EPA), Rick Hansen (USFWS), Ward Lenz
(USACOE), Janet Sternburg (MoConservation)

Team Members Present

Donna Day, Brian Horton, Ken Kinney, Wesley Stephen

Meeting Purpose
As the initial meeting of the Resource Agency Committee (RAC), this meeting served as
a study kick-off to acquaint the members with the following information:
• Planning Context and Project Overview
• Study Area Conditions and Needs
• Street-Running Light Rail Transit (LRT)
• Preliminary Alternatives and Evaluation Criteria
• Next Steps

Introductions
Donna Day, Manager, Transportation Corridor Improvement Group, opened the meeting
by having all meeting participants introduce themselves. A MoDOT representative
offered that Mary Ridgeway had replaced Don Neumann at FHWA. Following the RAC
member introductions, Ms. Day reviewed the agenda and explained the purpose of the
meeting. Joan Roeseler clarified that FTA would be the federal funding agency if the
project moved beyond planning.

Planning Context and Project Overview

Ms. Day began the presentation with aid of a Powerpoint slide show. Ms. Day explained
that the Northside-Southside Study is a continuation of the Major Transportation
Investment Analyses (MTIAs) studies completed in 2000. The MTIAs and Northside-
Southside Study are conducted under the National Environment Policy Act process so
that, if the study moves into the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) phase, the work
will become part of that subsequent phase of the project. Ms. Day explained that the
Northside-Southside Study will update and refine the locally preferred alternatives
(LPAs) selected in 2000, but only Minimum Operating Segments within the City of St.
Louis. The unique funding for the study comes from MoDED transportation tax credits
for distressed communities, limiting the current study to within the qualifying community
of the City of St. Louis. Ms. Day explained how resource agencies were involved in the
MTIAs and then handed off the presentation to Ken Kinney.

Ken Kinney, Project Manager, explained the project schedule, recent community
engagement, and the study areas.

Study Area Conditions and Needs

Ken Kinney shared maps showing land use, population, activity centers, vehicle
availability, income, transit usage, and environmental considerations. Mr. Kinney
discussed the transportation-related problems that were identified through the scoping
process and outlined the purpose and need for both corridors. He explained that both the
Northside and Southside need transit to access opportunity and to help create sustainable
development.

Street-Running LRT
Mr. Kinney shared photos of existing MetroLink and its exclusiveright-of-way and high-
platform light rail vehicles (LRVs). Then, Mr. Kinney showed how other cities have
primarily low-platform LRVs with street-running operations. Pictures shared included
scenes from Portland, Dallas and Minneapolis.

Preliminary Alternatives and Evaluation Criteria

Mr. Kinney showed maps of the five preliminary light rail alternatives and one bus rapid
transit (BRT) alternative:
• Natural Bridge Road (2000 LPA);
• Florissant Avenue;
• Chouteau Avenue/UPRR (2000 LPA);
• Gravois Avenue;
• Grand Boulevard; and
• Bus Rapid Transit/UPRR (2000 LPA).

Mr. Kinney explained how alternatives would be evaluated, using criteria such as
ridership, development opportunities, and cost.

Next Steps
Mr. Kinney said that the next steps would include screening alternatives to a smaller set
of final alternatives. Donna Day explained the constraints for project development
beyond the study, including lack of local funding as match for a FTA New Starts project.
Ms. Day then polled members to determine the preferred methods for distributing future
documents for agency review. Members indicated emailing a linked PDF as the best
method. Two to three future meetings are anticipated throughout the course of the study.

Resource Agency Committee Questions:

• Q: Any projections beyond 2000?
A: Model is being revamped with new projections out to 2035.

Northside-Southside Study TAC Meeting #1 Summary

-2-
 • Q: Mapped transit needs appear to be more origin-oriented. What about
destinations?
A: These corridors are more origin-rich. Downtown would become transfer-hub,
if not end-destination for riders.
• Q: Why no BRT on Northside?
A: BRT did not increase projected ridership very much in 2000 MTIA. The
Northside is already well served by bus transit and most of the streets are not
congested.
• Q: Why only UPRR as BRT alternative on Southside?
A: New LRT alternatives suggested by community use varying amounts of
UPRR ROW, while BRT alternative is carried over from 2000 MTIA. The area
is already fairly well served by bus transit.
• Q: Can you use alternate vehicles on freight rail lines, like diesel multiple units
(DMUs)?
A: Yes, if there is a suitable freight railroad line. In this study we are focusing on
LRVs on separate tracks in shared ROW.
• Q: Any other impacts in alternatives evaluation?
A: Numerous measures as in past studies. Just key issues highlighted today.
• Q: Hazardous waste sites appear alongside but not in ROW. Would trains leave
any public or private (RR) ROW?
A: All alternatives attempt to remain within established transportation corridors
(public roadways and private rail corridors).
• Q: What about the SAFETEA-LU money?
A: Recent transportation act included authorizations for these corridors. Unlike
FHWA authorizations, FTA authorizations only recognize a project need.Funding is
not earmarked until allocated under the competitive FTA New Starts program.
• Q: How does Metro South connect?
A: Either just south of River Des Peres (Metro South Orange alternative) or near
Green Park (Blue Alternative). Even if Metro South were high-floor LRV and
Southside low-floor LRV, shared stations in South County along I-55 could have
both high- and low-platforms.

Adjournment
The meeting concluded at 2:05 p.m.

Northside-Southside Study TAC Meeting #1 Summary

-3-
 Northside-Southside Study
Resource Agency Committee Meeting
Tuesday, September 25, 2007, 12:00 p.m.
Missouri Department of Transportation, 1320 Creek Trail Dr., Jefferson City, MO

RAC Members Present

Steve Billings (MoDOT), Kim Johnson (EPA), Bob Kraus (MoDOT), Mark Kross
(MoDOT), Doyle Brown (MO Dept. Conservation, in place of Janet Sternburgh)

RAC Members Absent

Nick Chevarnce (NPS), Joe Cothern (EPA), Rick Hansen (USFWS), Ward Lenz
(USACOE), Brian Weiler (MoDOT), Joan Roeseler (a separate meeting with Ms.
Roeseler of the FTA was held at East-West Gateway on Wednesday, September 19 at
Noon), Jane Beetem (MoDNR), Donny Hamilton and Brad McMahon (FHWA), Sam Noe
(FRA)

Team Members Present

Jerry Blair, Russell Volmert, Rick Nannega, Wesley Stephen

Meeting Purpose
This was the second and final meeting of the Resource Agency Committee (RAC.) The
first meeting, held on June 26, 2006, in Jefferson City, served as a study kick-off to
acquaint the members with study background information. The purpose of this follow up
meeting was to share information on the work that has occurred to date, including the
following key elements:
• Community engagement efforts
• Street-Running Light Rail Transit (LRT) detailed alternatives and evaluation
• Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative
• Next Steps

Introductions
Jerry Blair, Director of Transportation, East-West Gateway, opened the meeting by
asking all in attendance to introduce themselves. Mr. Blair then provided context by
describing the basis for this study. He described the three Major Transportation
Investment Analyses (MTIA) that East-West Gateway conducted in the 1990s: Northside,
Southside and Daniel Boone MTIAs. All three were progressed as Option 1.5 under the
NEPA process - meaning all requirements up to but not including NEPA documents
were completed. He emphasized the inter-agency coordination efforts that took place
during those early planning efforts. The current Northside-Southside study, therefore,
builds upon the earlier completed studies, specifically the locally preferred alternatives
(LPA) for light rail that emerged from those studies. However, because of the funding
made available for this study, only transit improvements for the City of St. Louis may be
studied at this time.
In response to a question as to why other transit options (namely, bus rapid transit) were
not studied or recommended (as they were in the previous studies), Mr. Blair mentioned
that both the City and Citizens for Modern Transit, a major public transit advocacy group,
have indicated a preference for light rail. In addition input from the public on previous
planning studies has illustrated support for light rail over other transit options.

Northside/Soutshide Presentation
Next, Russ Volmert, Deputy Project Manager discussed the study in detail, with the aid
of a PowerPoint presentation and several large display boards. In reviewing the study’s
timeline, Mr. Volmert pointed out that the study is nearing completion, with the draft
final document currently under production and expected by the end of October. He also
pointed out that the recommended Locally Preferred Alternative would be presented to
the East-West Gateway’s Board of Directors for adoption on October 31. Mr. Volmert
then gave a recapitulation of the community involvement efforts undertaken as part of the
study. He mentioned various outreach efforts with elected and appointed officials,
including the various departments of the City of St. Louis: the Mayor’s office, members
of the Board of Aldermen, the Planning Department, and Board of Public Service.
Outreach briefings and presentations were also conducted with the fire and police
departments and members of the development community. However, special attention
was given to the individual communities along the alignments on the Northside and
Southside, including the non-English speaking communities on the Southside. Mr.
Volmert also mentioned the last round of public meetings that were held on September
18, 19 and 20.

Street-Running LRT
Mr. Volmert discussed the various preliminary alignments and the factors, e.g. land use,
urban design, safety, etc. that lead to the selection of the preferred alignments on the
Northside, Downtown and Southside. Various images showing examples of street
running from across the country were shared with the Committee. In addition, computer
generated images of light rail vehicles and tracks in the City of St. Louis were presented,
including how examples of how safety issues can be addressed.

Rick Nannega discussed the engineering and safety elements of the alignments. Using
plan/profile sheets (showing the tracks and stations along the alignment in Northside,
Southside and Downtown), Mr. Nannega pointed out the closure of certain streets, track
placement (raised median on the arterials and flush with the pavement in downtown) as
well as the reconfiguration of the Broadway/Jefferson intersection on the Southside. Mr.
Nannega also discussed the challenges on the Union Pacific alignment, including the
railroad’s right-of-way clearance requirements, property takings and the need to
reconstruction overpasses.

Next, Mr. Vollmert highlighted the key differentiators between the various alignments,
pointing out the advantages of the final alignments that were selected. The final
alignments are:
• Northside: Natural Bridge Avenue/14th Street
• Downtown: 9th Street / 10th Street One-Way Couplet

Northside-Southside Study TAC Meeting #1 Summary

-2-
 • Southside: Jefferson Avenue/Interstate 55

Mr. Volmert explained that the three alignments represent a single locally preferred
alternative.

Mr. Volmert presented information on capital costs and ridership. As it relates to

ridership, he explained that the results were preliminary. In response to a question on
operations and maintenance costs, Mr. Nannega indicated that those costs were close to
being completed. However, he roughly estimated an annual expense of between 12 and
13 million. Fare box revenue, explained Mr. Blair, would only cover about 20 percent of
operations costs. Further, maintenance costs will have to reflect either the expansion of
Metro’s current facility at Ewing St. or the construction of a new facility.

Next Steps
Both Mr. Blair and Mr. Volmert explained that the next logical steps, following adoption
of the LPA would be the Draft Environment Impact Statement and (perhaps concurrently)
the FTA’s New Starts Application, flowed by preliminary engineering. However, at this
time, no funding has been identified to allow these next steps. Mr. Blair also discussed
the current discussions underway in St. Louis Co. to seek voter approval of a sales tax
increase to fund Metro expansion into the County. He explained that, typically, the
source of funding has and will dictate what is built, when and where.

Adjournment
The meeting concluded at 2:30 p.m.

Northside-Southside Study TAC Meeting #1 Summary

-3-
 NORTHSIDE-SOUTHSIDE OUTREACH PRESENTATION LIST
As of 10/17/07

Date Time Organization Location North-South

Team Members
3/18/06 2:10 pm-3:25 SLACO’s Neighborhood Conference Forest Park Community College Donna, Russ and
pm Room B-110 Brian

3/23/06 10:00 a.m. Downtown St. Louis Partnership’s 901 Olive Street, Suite 200 Donna, Ken and
Transportation Committee Laurna

3/23/06 3:30 pm. Citizens for Modern Transit Donna and Ken
Presentation

4/3/06 5:00 p.m. Old North St. Louis Restoration Group 2800 N. 14th Street Brian and Laurna
(Board Meeting – 20 people)

4/6/06 7:00 p.m. Carondelet Community Betterment Sisters of St. Joseph Donna and Laurna
(1st pres.) Federation (40 – 60 people) 6400 Minnesota

4/15/06 10:00 a.m. First Ward Meeting All Saints Church Brian and Claude
Rep. Yaphett El-Amin, 5010 Terry Avenue
committeewoman
4/17/06 7:00 p.m. Chippewa Neighborhood Association Alexium Court Brian and Vector
(15 – 20 people) 2636 Chippewa (behind bank)

4/18/06 6:30 p.m. Jamison Memorial Human Resource & 2809 Washington Brian and Vector
Development Agency 531-9691
Lillian Curlett, Program Manager
(parents who use public transp.)
4/20/06 7:00 p.m. 6th Ward organization meeting St. Louis Gauss House Brian and Claude
Ald. Lewis Reed 18th and Chouteau

Northside-Southside Master Outreach Schedule

1
4/26/06 7:00 p.m. Morganford Neighborhood Assoc. St. John’s Lutheran Church Brian and Paula
Charlene Earlywine 3716 Morganford Rd.
664-2546 (Meet in cafeteria around back /
(10-15 people) parking off Meramec)

4/27/06 6:00 p.m. 21st Ward organization meeting Wesley House Brian and Claude
Ald. Bennice Jones-King 4507 Lee Avenue

5/1/06 6:00 p.m. Forest Park Southeast Development Adams Park Community Center Brian and Paula
Corporation 4317 Vista

5/1/06 7:00 p.m. Shaw Neighborhood Improvement Saint Margaret of Scott Church Brian and Paula
Assoc. (Door to basement is in back)
771-3101 3864 Flad
5/1/06 8:00 p.m. (mtg Dutchtown South Community Corp. Thomas Dunn Memorial 3113 Brian and Paula
starts at 7p.m., Debbie Irwin Gasconade and Minnesota
on agenda for 8 352-4865 (Parking off of Minnesota)
p.m.) (40 – 50 people)
5/2/06 7:30 (On Benton Park Neighborhood Association Epiphany church on 2911 McNair
agenda for 8 664-1896 / 286-2840 St. (2 blocks from Benton)
pm) Mr. Chris Rowley
(30-50 People)
5/3/06 6:30 pm Urban League Area Council Urban League Brian and Claude
Federation of Block Units 3701 Grandel Square
Norman R. Seay
5/4/06 7:00 p.m. Chippewa Park Community Association Senior Center (behind Burlington Brian and Paula
Mark Tettenhorst, President Coat Factory)
351-5303 4705 Ridgewood
(30-40 people)
5/9/06 6:00 p.m. Gravois Park Block Link Association St. Matthews Church Brian and Paula
Rita Ford, President 2613 Potomac
(h) 664-3425

Northside-Southside Master Outreach Schedule

2
05/10/06 7:00 p.m. Urban League Area Council Hilton Point Apartments Brian and Claude
Unit A 1st Floor – Maple Entrance
Vincent Phillips Belt and Maple
05/13/06 1:00 pm. Urban League Area Council City Hope Bible Church Brian and Claude
Unit F 5868 West Florissant
Pam Boyd
05/15/06 7:00 p.m. Urban League Area Council Urban League Brian and Claude
Unit C-D 3701 Grandel Square
Beatrice Hudson
5/16/06 9:30 a.m. Near Southside Council Grace Hill Brian and Paula
Cheryl Lee 2220 Lemp
982-2468
(20 People)
5/16/06 11:30 a.m. Women’s Transportation Seminar/CMT Engineer’s Club Donna and Laurna
(Luncheon. 100 people) 4359 Lindell Blvd.

5/17/06 7 p.m. Grand Oak Hill Community Corp. 4168 Juniata Brian and Paula
Zach Wilson
865-5530 ext. 108
(40-50 people)

5/18/06 7 p.m. Benton Park West Neighborhood Assoc. Five Star Senior Center Russ and Laurna
Chad Johnson, President 2832 Arsenal
771-0803 / 776-4447(home)
(20-50 people)
5/18/06 8:00 p.m. 27th Ward Organization 6080 W. Florissant Russ and Laurna
Curtis Royston (50 people) Greater Pentecostal Church

5/22/06 7:30 p.m. Holly Hills Improvement Association Southern Commercial Bank Russ and Paula
Dan Haag 5515 S Grand
[email protected]

Northside-Southside Master Outreach Schedule

3
5/25/06 6:30 p.m. 3rd Ward Clay School Donna and Claude
Alderman Freeman Bosley 3820 N 14th St

5/25/06 7:30 p.m. Tower Grove East St. Elizabeth Academy, 3401 Donna and Paula
Norah Ryan, President Arsenal St. (back parking lot / off
727-7122 Louisiana St. just north of Arsenal
(30-50 people) / enter through the courtyard
entrance in far corner)
5/25/06 10:00 a.m. East-West Gateway’s Air Quality/Air East-West Gateway Donna
Control Committee
Mike Coulson
5/30/06 7 p.m. Fox Park Neighborhood Association Berea Presbyterian Church Brian and Mark
Chris Barton 2621 Russell (West of Jefferson,
772-8170 or cell: 314-518-4903 building right of Daycare)
(15-30 people)
5/31/06 7:00 p.m. 2nd Ward Democratic Organization Charlotte’s Hall Brian and Claude
Committeeman Claude Brown 8707 Riverview Blvd.
Alderwoman Dionne Flowers
6/3/06 11:00 a.m. Fourth Ward Neighborhood Meeting St. James Church Brian and Claude
Norma Leggette, Committeewoman

6/7/06 7:00 p.m. Soulard Restoration Group Sts. Peter and Paul Parish House Brian and Paula
th
Dana Brackeen – President 8 and Allen (park in parking lot at
(w) 314-345-4709 (cell) 314-249-9977 Southwest corner and go upstairs
to second floor)
6/8/06 6 p.m. (on South Broadway Merchants’ Carondelet St. Joseph Care Brian and Paula
agenda for Association Building (Sister’s of St. Joseph
6:30) Jaymes Dearing, President Motherhouse)
351-4099 6400 Minnesota Ave.
(30 people)

06/20/06 6:00 p.m. Urban League Area Council Wesley House Brian and Claude
Unit E 4507 Lee
Carrie Bell

Northside-Southside Master Outreach Schedule

4
6/22/06 6:30 p.m. Fairground Community Development Prairie Community Center Brian and Claude
Corporation 3808 West Florissant

8/3/06 7:00 p.m. Carondelet Community Betterment Sister’s of St. Joseph’s Dining Brian and Paula
Association Room
6400 Minnesota Avenue
8/9/06 9:30 a.m. Alderman Jeffery Boyd – 22nd Ward City Hall Ken and Claude

8/10/06 8:30 a.m. Rep. John Bowman, Rep. Connie Pavilion Hilton (4th and Olive) Ken and Claude
Johnson – Chairman and Co-Chair of
Legislative Black Caucus
8/15/06 10:00 a.m. Alderman Freeman Bosley – 3rd Ward Prairie Community Center Brian and Claude
3808 West Florissant

8/29/06 9:30 a.m. Alderwoman April Ford Griffin – 5th City Hall Ken and Claude
Ward

8/29/06 10:00 a.m. Alderwoman Phyllis Young – 7th Ward City Hall Ken, Claude and
Laurna

8/29/06 10:45 a.m. Alderman Lewis Reed City Hall Ken and Claude

8/31/06 6:15 p.m. 22nd Ward Community Meeting Friendly Temple Church Brian and Claude
(contact Ald. Jeffery Boyd) 5515 Dr. Martin Luther King
9/6/06 7:00 p.m. Gate District 2929 Caroline Mission Russ and Paula
(Includes: Eads, Buder & St. Vincent)
Steve Zeiger
865-2387
[email protected]
9/6/06 7:45 p.m. Soulard Restoration Group Sts. Peter and Paul Parish House Russ and Paula
th
Dana Brackeen – President 8 and Allen (park in parking lot at
Southwest corner and go upstairs
Northside-Southside Master Outreach Schedule
5
 [email protected] to second floor)
(w) 314-345-4709 (cell) 314-249-9977

9/11/06 7:15 p.m. Shaw Neighborhood Improvement Saint Margaret of Scott Church Wesley and Paula
Monday Assoc. – Jenny Gerstner (Door to basement is in back)
[email protected] 3864 Flad
771-3101
Home: 773-4872

9/12/06 7:00 p.m. Lafayette Square Restoration Lafayette Park United Methodist Ken Kinney and Paula
Committee (whole group) Church
Dane Drefke ([email protected])
9/20/06 7:00 p.m. Fifth Ward Meeting Jefferson & Cass, Fire Station Brian and Claude

9/21/06 6:00 p.m. Jamison Memorial Human Resource & 2809 Washington Brian and Paula
Development Agency
Lillian Curlett, Program Manager
[email protected]
531-9691
9/21/06 7:00 p.m. Old North St. Louis Restoration Group 2800 N. 14th Street (office) Brian and Paula
Thursday (Pres. John Burse sits on PAC)
Jane: [email protected]
241-5031
(20-40 people)
9/25/06 6:30 p.m. Marine Villa Improvement Association St. Alexis Hospital Wesley and Paula
Monday Craig Schmid 3933 S. Broadway
771-5576 or 589-6816 (Osage side of Building, Peterson
Hall)

Northside-Southside Master Outreach Schedule

6
9/26/06 5:30 p.m.
Forest Park Southeast Development Taylor Center (Jolly Room) Claude and Russ
Tuesday (would like
Corporation – Irving Blue (Also invited 4900 Manchester
extended Q &
McRee Town Neighborhood
A time)Association)
533-6704
[email protected]
(30 people)
9/26/06 7:00 p.m. Fox Park Neighborhood Association Emmaus Lutheran School Russ and Claude
Tuesday Chris Barton 2617 Shenandoah.
[email protected]
772-8170 or cell: 314-518-4903
(15-30 people)
9/28/06 CANCELLED Tower Grove East St. Elizabeth Academy, 3401 Russ and Laurna
Norah Ryan, President Arsenal St. (back parking lot / off
[email protected] Louisiana St. just north of Arsenal
727-7122 / enter through the courtyard
(30-50 people) entrance in far corner)
9/28/06 7:00 p.m. Fairgrounds Neighborhood Association 3808 West Florissant Russ and Claude
James Williams
Home: 535-9980
(10-25 people)
9/28/06 8:00 p.m. Metropolitan Congregations United 2nd Presbyterian Church Russ and Claude
Board Meeting Taylor & Westminster
Use entrance on West Minister
side
10/02/06 7:00 p.m. McKinley Heights Neighborhood Sigel Elementary School Brian and Paula
Assoc. Mike Siemens, President 2050 Allen Ave. (On Russell &
[email protected] McNare)
302-9997
10/03/06 7:30 p.m. Benton Park Neighborhood Association Epiphany church on 2911 McNair Brian and Paula
Tuesday Mr. Chris Rowley St. (2 blocks from Benton)
[email protected]
664-1896 / 286-2840
(30-50 People)
Northside-Southside Master Outreach Schedule
7
 10/10/06 CANCELLED Churches Committed to Community Oak Hill Presbeterian CANCELLED
Concerns (Executive Committee is 6 4111 Connecticut
people / They will distribute information (Corner of Oak Hill & Connecticut
to the whole board) / South of Tower Grove Park)
Katie Jansen – 367-3484
[email protected]
10/10/06 6:00 p.m. African-American Leaders’ meeting Mayor Slay’s office Laurna and Russ
Room 200

10/19/06 7:00 p.m. 6th Ward Organization St. Louis Gaus House Brian and Claude
Contact Mary Enthrup

10/19/06 8:30 p.m. 27th Ward Organization All Saints Church / Kingshighway Brian and Claude
Contact C. Johnson - C. Royston and terry / entrance on Terry

10/21/06 10:00 A.M. 1st Ward Organization CANCELLED Brian and Claude
Contact: Yaphette El-Amin

10/26/06 7:00 p.m. 2nd Ward Organization Charlotte's Hall, 8709 Riverview Brian and Claude
Contact Claude Brown

10/28/06 10 AM - 1 PM International Institute, Prosperity Fair International Institute Brian and Paula
Saturday

11/15/06 7:00 p.m. Grand Oak Hill Community Corp. 4168 Juniata Brian and Paula
Wednesday, Mark Etling
(Sept. Agenda 865-5530 ext. 110
already full; [email protected]
No Oct. Mtg.) (40-50 people)
11/16/06 7 p.m. Hill 2000 (The Hill Neighborhood St. Ambrose School Cafeteria Paula & Brian
Thursday (Following Organization) 5110 Wilson
Police) Tom Stremlau, President Parking & Entrance in Rear
Daytime: 822-6715 Evening: 773-3560
(75-100 People)

Northside-Southside Master Outreach Schedule

8
 11/28/06 6:30 a.m. - Ameren One Ameren Plaza Paula & Brian
10:00 a.m. Otie Cowan 1901 Chouteau Avenue, 63166
314-554-4740
12/8/06 10:00 a.m. - Laclede Gas Company 720 Olive Street, 8th Floor, 63101 Paula & Brian
2:00 p.m. 314-342-0530
Ellen Theroff
04/16/07 7:00 pm Urban League Area Council Urban League Claude & Brian
Monday Unit C-D 3701 Grandel Square
Beatrice Hudson
04/16/07 7:45pm NAACP City Branch Southwestern Bell Library Claude & Brian
Monday Harris State University

04/18/07 6:30 p.m. 5th Ward Organization St Louis Fire Department Claude & Brian
Wednesday Headquarters
Jefferson and Cass
04/19/07 3:00 p.m. 4th Ward* City Hall Claude & Brian
Thursday Alderman Sam Moore

04/19/07 2:00 pm. 5th Ward City Hall Claude & Brian
Thursday Alderman April Ford Griffin

04/27/07 9:00 a.m. 22nd Ward City Hall Claude & Brian
Friday Alderman Jeffery Boyd

5/14/07 6:00 p.m. Forest Park Southeast Development Taylor Center (Jolly Room) Brian & Paula
Monday Corporation – Irving Blue (Also invited 4900 Manchester
(Board McRee Town Neighborhood
Meeting) Association)
[email protected]
(30 people)
5/16/07 7:00 p.m. Grand Oak Hill Community Corp. 4168 Juniata Brian & Paula
Wednesday (1st on Agenda) Mark Etling
[email protected]
(40-50 people)
Northside-Southside Master Outreach Schedule
9
05/16/07 7:00 p.m. 5th Ward Organization Fire Department Headquarters
Wednesday Jefferson and Cass

5/17/07 7:00 p.m. Hill 2000 (The Hill Neighborhood St. Ambrose School Cafeteria,
Thursday Organization) 5110 Wilson, Parking & Entrance
Tom Stremlau in Rear
(75-100 People)

05/24/07 6:45 p.m. 22 Ward Organization Friendly Temple Baptist Church Claude & Brian
Thursday 5544 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Dr

5/24/07 8:00 p.m. (mtg. Tower Grove East St. Elizabeth Academy, 3401 Brian & Paula
Thursday starts at 7:30, Patrick Moore, President Arsenal St. (Back parking lot / off
on agenda for (30-50 people) Louisiana St. north of Arsenal /
8:00) [email protected] enter through courtyard entrance)

5/29/07 7:00 p.m. Fox Park Neighborhood Association Emmaus Lutheran

Tuesday Chris Barton – Vice President School, 2617 Shenandoah.
[email protected]
(15-30 people)
Jeff Matthews - President
6/01/07 9:45 a.m. Alderman Steve Conway Brian & Claude

6/01/07 1:15 p.m. Alderwoman Phyllis Young Brian & Claude

6/4/07 7:00 p.m. McKinley Heights Neighborhood Serbian Church (corner of Serbian Paula & Wesley
Monday Assoc. Mike Siemens, President and Geyer) Mcnair turns into
[email protected] Serbian. It is one block from Siegel
Elementary school.
6/05/07 7:00 p.m. Benton Park Neighborhood Association Epiphany church on 2911 McNair
Tuesday New President – Todd Brant St. (2 blocks from Benton)
(30-50 People)

Northside-Southside Master Outreach Schedule

10
6/6/07 7:00 p.m. Soulard Restoration Group Sts. Peter and Paul Parish House Brian & Paula
th
Wednesday Dana Brackeen – President 8 and Allen (park in parking lot at
[email protected] Southwest corner and go upstairs
to second floor)
6/7/07 7:00 p.m. Old North St. Louis Restoration Group, 1400 N Market St. Brian & Paula
Thursday Sean Thomas (Pres. John Burse sits on
PAC) (Jane Smith)
[email protected]
(20-40 people)
6/12/07 7:00 p.m. Lafayette Square Restoration Lafayette Park United Methodist
Tuesday Committee (whole group) Church
Dane Drefke ([email protected]) 2300 Lafayette
Rescheduled
6/25/07 6:30 p.m. Marine Villa Improvement Association St. Alexis Hospital Paula & Wesley
Monday Craig Schmid 3933 S. Broadway
(Osage side of Building, Peterson
Hall, Room A)
7/26/07 7:00pm Churches Committed to Community Second Presbyterian Church – Paula & Wesley
Concerns 4501 Westminster Place (Corner of
Joe (president) - [email protected] Taylor) in Central West End - Park
in lot and ring buzzer at door.
7/30/07 9:00 am City Treasurer’s Office - Michael Ross, Claude & Wesley
the Construction Administrator of the
Parking Administration
9/5/07 7:00 p.m. Gate District 2828 Caroline Mission CANCELLED
(Includes Buder, Eads & St. Vincent)
Steve Zeiger
[email protected]
10/25/07 7:00 p.m. 22nd Ward The Wesley House Claude & Wesley &
4507 Lee Ave. Paula

Northside-Southside Master Outreach Schedule

11
 Northside-Southside
Transit Improvements Study

Final June 2006 Open Houses’

Comment Summary Report

Submitted By:
Vector Communications and Howard/Stein-Hudson
July 19, 2006
Executive Summary

Sponsored by East-West Gateway Council of Governments, Metro and the Missouri Department of
Transportation, the “Northside-Southside Transit Improvements Study” is an 18-month planning study,
looking at light rail and other transit improvements for sections of North St. Louis City, South St. Louis
City and downtown. The study will result in the recommendation of a locally preferred alternative for the
Northside, Southside and downtown areas, including station locations and design, costs and benefits.

This report documents the public input gathered during the study’s first round of public meetings held in
June 2006. There were two sets of meetings. One set was for the general public and involved three open
houses on three consecutive days. The other set was for limited-English speaking people and involved
two meetings on the same day at separate locations. Similar information was presented at each set of
meetings. In total, 198 people attended both sets of meetings.

The primary focus of all the meetings was to present the eight preliminary alternatives identified to best
meet the City of St. Louis’ transit needs. In addition, attendees were asked to comment on why transit
improvements are needed and on what criteria they thought is most important in evaluating the
preliminary alternatives.

Public Open Houses Summary

At the open houses for the general public, the preliminary alternatives that received the most positive
responses were: Natural Bridge Avenue on the Northside, the Olive/Chestnut Single Track Loop
downtown and the Chouteau Avenue to Grand Avenue alignment on the Southside. Although they
received negative responses as well, respondents felt these preliminary alternatives provided development
opportunities and served the most people.

Two of the eight preliminary alternatives received the most negative responses from participants as
compared to positive responses – Bus Rapid Transit along the Union Pacific Right-of-Way on the
Southside and the Florissant Avenue alignment on the Northside. Most participants noted disliking the
Bus Rapid Transit alternative because it was bus rapid transit and not light rail transit. Respondents noted
disliking the Florissant Avenue alternative because they felt it was remote and would not serve populated
areas.

The remaining three alternatives, Chouteau Avenue to Union Pacific Right of Way and Gravois Avenue
to Union Pacific Right-of-Way on the Southside and the 9th /10th One-way Couplet downtown received a
variety of responses both positive and negative. Respondents had a number of questions about the
location of the alternatives, potential ridership and availability of existing service.

The majority of respondents (85%) indicted that sustainable development, access to opportunity and
safety and security were correctly identified as reasons for transit improvements within the City of St.
Louis.

Attendees were also asked to identify the top two criteria for screening the preliminary alternatives. On
the Northside and Southside, the top two screening criteria are sustainable development opportunities
(49%) and population (47%) considerations. The top two screening criteria selected for the downtown are
ridership (75%) and development (48%).

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

2
The majority of the people who attended the open houses were local residents and/or frequent travelers.
Open house participants were made aware of the open houses through receiving information via email,
viewing posters placed on buses or hearing a TV or radio advertisement.

Overall respondents felt that the open houses were very useful, well organized and well worth attending.

Limited-English Speaking Meeting Summary

At the meetings for limited-English speaking people, the alternative that received the most positive
responses was the Chouteau to Grand Avenue one on the Southside. Respondents liked this alternative
because of its close proximity to St. Louis University, to work and to area grocery stores.

As for the reasons for transit improvements, respondents agreed that study team had correctly identified
them as sustainable development, access to opportunity and safety and security. The top two criteria that
respondents selected for evaluating the Northside and Southside preliminary alternatives were
employment (26%) and population (26%) considerations. For downtown, the top two criteria selected
were development (32%) and ridership (29%).

Public Open Houses

Three general public open houses were held from June 13-15, 2006. The Northside open house took place
on Tuesday, June 13, 2006, from 5:00 p.m.-7:30 p.m. at the Herbert Hoover Boys and Girls Club. The
downtown open house took place on Wednesday, June 14, 2006, from 3:30 p.m.-6:00 p.m. at the
Downtown St. Louis Partnership. The Southside open house took place on Thursday, June 15, 2006,
from 5:00 p.m.-7:30 p.m. at the Missouri Botanical Garden’s Monsanto Center. All three open houses
contained the same content, and the same PowerPoint presentation was shown at each one.

In total, 157 people attended the public open houses. Upon arrival, meeting participants were asked to
indicate on a study area map their residence and place of employment. In total, the meeting participants
identified more than 90 residences and 75 employment locations within the study area.

At each open house there were eight information stations focusing on the following topics: 1) Northside-
Southside Study Overview; 2) Understanding Transit: 3) Planning History: 4) Study Area Existing
Conditions; 5) Purpose and Need: 6) Evaluation Criteria; 7) Preliminary Alternatives: and, 8) Public
Involvement and Next Steps. Study team members were available at each station to talk with participants
and to answer questions.

A comment form was distributed to meeting participants as they entered the open house meetings.
Attendees were asked to complete the comment form on-site after they visited all the stations. Seventy-
seven meeting participants completed comment forms and 13 were submitted by mail or e-mail. Meeting
participants were asked to comment on the transit needs identified for the study area; the screening
criteria identified for the evaluation of the preliminary alternatives; preliminary light rail and other rapid
transit routes; and, the public involvement activities.

Comments

The information provided below follows the order of the comment form. A copy of the comment form is
attached as Appendix A. Of the 157 people who attended the open houses 77 (49%) completed comment
forms. Please note that there are not an equal number of responses for each question because some
attendees did not complete all questions.

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

3
Transit Needs

At station #5, the reasons for transit improvements within the City of St. Louis were identified as
“sustainable development, access to opportunity and safety and security.” Meeting participants were
asked to circle “yes” or “no” if the study team had correctly identified their area’s transit needs.

An overwhelming 85% of those who responded to this question selected “yes”, indicating that their area’s
transit needs had been correctly identified. Fifteen percent of respondents selected “no” indicating that
their area’s transit needs had not been correctly identified.

Respondents who answered “no” to this question felt that transit improvements should be close to current
population and activity centers. These respondents felt that there needs to be more of an effort to serve
the transit dependent.

A few respondents also noted that they do not live in the area and would not ride the routes very often.
Thus, that is why the study team had not identified their transit needs. Appendix B lists respondents’
verbatim comments regarding transit needs.

Have we correctly identified your area's transit needs?

No
15%

Yes
85%

Screening Criteria

At station #6, screening criteria was identified for the Northside and Southside and downtown. Meeting
participants were asked to check the two most important criteria to consider when evaluating the different
areas.

Respondents could choose employment concentrations, population concentrations, transit-dependent

market, sustainable development opportunities or capital cost. Of those who responded, 49% felt
sustainable development opportunities were most important when evaluating the Northside and Southside
areas. Population concentrations (47%), employment concentrations (44%) and transit-dependent
markets (44%) were also identified as important by respondents.

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

4
 What criteria are most important when evaluating the
Northside and Southside areas?

Capital cost Employment

18% concentrations
44%

Population
concentrations
47%

Transit-dependent
markets
44%

Sustainable
development
opportunities
49%

For the downtown area, respondents had four screening criteria selections from which to choose
including: ridership; sustainable development; costs; and impacts. Of those who responded, 75% felt
ridership was the most important screening criteria when evaluating the downtown area. With 48% of
respondents selecting sustainable development opportunities and 39% percent selecting impacts as
important screening criteria.

What criteria are most important for evaluating the Downtown area?

Impacts
39%

Ridership
75%

Development
48%

Costs
37%

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

5
Preliminary Alternatives

At station #7, meeting participants viewed the preliminary alternatives for the study area. Tow
alternatives were presented for the Northside, including the Natural Bridge Avenue alternative, which
came out of previous planning studies known as the Major Transit Improvements Analyses or MTIAs.
Four alternatives were presented for the Southside, including the Chouteau Avenue to the Union Pacific
Right-of-Way, which came out of the MTIAs. There were two alternatives for the downtown area. They
were asked to share their thoughts about each alternative. More than 350 verbatim comments were
recorded. The table below summarizes those views. Appendix C lists respondents’ verbatim comments
regarding the preliminary alternatives. Please note that when they commented, not all respondents
commented about the alternative itself.

TOTAL
ALTERNATIVE COMMENTS GOOD NOT GOOD
NS-Natural Bridge Avenue 58 16 1
NS-Florissant Avenue 51 5 10
SS-Chouteau to Union Pacific 43 9 1
R-O-W
SS-Gravois to Union Pacific R-O-W 44 10 3
SS-Chouteau to Grand 49 12 7
SS-Bus Rapid Transit on Union Pacific 41 7 25
R-O-W
DT-9th/10th one-Way Pair/Couplet 39 12 8
DT- Olive/Chestnut Single- Track Loop 43 18 7

Northside – Natural Bridge Avenue

Sixteen of the general comments received on the Natural Bridge Avenue alternative stated that the
alternative is good. Only one general comment expressed that the alternative is not good.

Respondents felt that the Natural Bridge Avenue alternative would serve a larger population area than
many of the other alternatives. Several respondents noted that the street was wide and ideal for a light rail
route. Respondents also felt that this route had great economic development potential.

Northside – Florissant Avenue

Out of the general comments received on this alternative, five stated that the alternative is good and ten
stated that the alternative was not good.

Respondents felt there would not be enough ridership to support this alternative. Many noted that the
alternative would mostly serve cemeteries and parks and not populated areas. Several respondents also
noted that the corridor may be too narrow for street-running light rail.

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

6
Southside – Chouteau Avenue to Union Pacific Right-of-Way

Of the general comments received on the Chouteau Avenue to Union Pacific Right-of-Way alternative,
nine stated that the alternative is good and only one stated that the alternative is not good.

A number of respondents felt that this alternative was the most economical and would run through several
heavily populated areas. Many respondents noted that the alternative would also travel through older
commercial and industrial areas but they were hopeful that it would help spur economic development and
redevelopment in those areas.

Southside – Gravois Avenue to Union Pacific Right-of-Way

Of the general comments received on the Gravois Avenue to Union Pacific Right-of-Way alternative ten
stated that the alternative is good and three stated that the alternative is not good.

Respondents felt that this alternative provided direct connections to downtown and existing bus routes. It
was noted that this alternative could really encourage commercial development and help the Southside.

Those who opposed the alternative were concerned about traffic problems and difficult intersections and
felt that the area was already well served by buses.

Southside – Chouteau Avenue to Grand Avenue

Of the general comments that were received on the Chouteau Avenue to Grand Avenue alternative,
twelve stated that the alternative is good and seven stated that the alternative is not good.

Respondents who felt the alternative was not good were concerned about traffic problems and narrow
roadways. It was stated that this area is already crowded and there is not enough room for street-running
light-rail.

Some respondents felt this was a great opportunity to take advantage of the existing development and
population densities. This area is already a high-density area for pedestrians.

Southside – Bus Rapid Transit along Union Pacific Right-of-Way

Of the general comments received seven stated that the alternative is good and twenty-five stated that the
alternative is not good.

A large number of respondents voiced that they wanted to see light rail transit not more buses in this area.
One respondent noted that buses are important but not in the place of light rail transit.

Respondents felt that this alternative would not support development or redevelopment.

Downtown – 9th/10th One-Way Pair Couplet

Of the general comments received on the 9th/10th One-Way Pair Couplet alternative, twelve stated that the
alternative is good and eight stated that the alternative is not good.

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

7
Respondents who opposed this alternative felt that the proposed line was too much like the existing
MetroLink.

Respondents who supported the alternative liked how it would provide service to the downtown and other
key locations. Many felt it would help encourage additional redevelopment and growth downtown.

Downtown - Olive/Chestnut Single Track Loop

Of the general comments received on the Olive/Chestnut Single Track Loop alternative, eighteen stated
that the alternative is good and seven stated that the alternative is not good.

Many respondents felt that the alternative would promote development and redevelopment opportunities.
Others preferred the alternative because would serve more of the downtown area.

Respondents who did not favor the alternative felt that the area was already pretty well served by transit
to begin with. Respondents were also concerned about light rail competing with traffic and the narrow
streets.

Public Involvement

The public involvement questions asked participants to describe themselves and how they learned about
the open houses. Participants were also asked to rate the open house according to the information
provided and the competence of the study team. Overall, the majority of the meeting participants were
residents. More than half of the meeting participants indicated they saw a poster on a transit vehicle,
heard a TV or radio advertisement or received an email message. A little less than a quarter of the
meeting participants were advised of the meetings through a community organization. More than half of
the respondents felt the information presented at the open house was “very useful” while another 47
percent considered it “useful”. Two-thirds of the respondents (66%) rated the study team as being “very
helpful” while more than half of the respondents felt the Open House was well worth attending. Below
are the results. Appendix D outlines respondents’ additional comments.

Stakeholder type:
80% Resident 11% Business Owner
32% Frequent Traveler 3% Adjacent Property Owner
13% Other (handicapped, CMT, Metro 1% Elected Official
employee, young professional)

How did you hear about the open house:

25% Other (bus posters, TV/radio) 12% Newspaper Ad
24% E-mail 7% Friend
22% Community Organization 7% Public Official
18% Newsletter 3% Co-worker
16% Flyer 3% Relative
14% Web site 1% Neighbor

The information provided was:

52% Very Useful 47% Useful 1% Not Very Useful

The study team was:

66% Very Helpful 34% Helpful 0% Not Helpful

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

8
In general, the open house was:
71% Well Organized 28% Organized 1% Not Well Organized
60% Well Worth Attending 40% Worth Attending 0% Not Worth Attending

Limited-English Speaking Meetings

Prior to the public open houses, study team members met with limited-English speaking residents,
particularly Latinos, Bosnians, Africans (Ethiopian Amharic and Somali Bantu) and Vietnamese. The
number of new immigrants and limited-English speaking people is growing in the City of St. Louis,
particularly on the Southside and particularly among Latino and Bosnian populations. Thus, the study
team felt it was important to engage these groups since many are also highly dependent on transit.

There were two meetings for limited-English speaking people on Sunday, June 11, 2006. The first
meeting was at St. Cecilia’s Catholic Church, the religious home that the St. Louis Archdiocese has
identified for Latino Catholics. A translator was present to interpret the speaker’s presentation. The other
meeting was held later the same day at the International Institute, which provides a variety of services for
newly arrived immigrants and New Americans. At this location, the presentations were conducted
simultaneously for Bosnian, Hispanic, African and Vietnamese immigrants. Translators for each
language assisted presenters with interpretation of information as well as completion of language specific
comment forms. In total, 41 people attended the two meetings.

Transit Needs

The reasons identified for transit improvements within the City of St. Louis were “sustainable
development, access to opportunity and safety and security.” Meeting participants were asked to circle
“yes” or “no” if we correctly identified their area’s transit needs.

All of the respondents indicted that sustainable development, access to opportunity and safety and
security were correctly identified as reasons for transit improvements within the City of St. Louis.

Screening Criteria

Screening criteria was identified for the Northside and Southside and Downtown alternatives. Meeting
participants were asked to check the two criteria they think are most important to consider when
evaluating the Northside and Southside areas.

The top two criteria selected for screening the preliminary alternatives on the Northside and Southside are
employment (26%) and population (26%) considerations.

The top two criteria selected for downtown are development (32%) and ridership (29%).

Preliminary Alternatives

The transit alternatives were presented for the study area. Meeting participants were asked to share their
thoughts about each alternative. More than 90 verbatim comments were recorded. . It should be noted
that Limited-English speaking meeting participants primarily reside in South St. Louis. Consequently, it
is not a surprise that their comments regarding alternatives serving North St. Louis were related more to
transit need and not the actual alignment. The table below summarizes those views.

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

9
 TOTAL
ALTERNATIVE COMMENTS GOOD NOT GOOD
NS-Natural Bridge Avenue 7 6 0
NS-Florissant Avenue 15 5 1
SS-Chouteau to Union Pacific 15 9 0
R-O-W
SS-Gravois to Union Pacific R-O-W 14 10 0
SS-Chouteau to Grand 23 17 1
SS-Bus Rapid Transit on Union Pacific 11 9 0
R-O-W
DT-9th/10th One-Way Pair/Couplet 6 6 0
DT- Olive/Chestnut Single- Track Loop 6 2 1

Northside – Natural Bridge Avenue

Of the general comments received six supported the alternative. Respondents feel there is a transit
dependent population that would be better served on Natural Bridge. They also noted that there is plenty
of land for construction and that Natural Bridge alternative would provide a good link from the inner city
to the highway.

Northside – Florissant Avenue

Of the general comments received only one meeting participant was not in support of this alternative.
The respondent questioned if this alternative is feasible.

Southside – Chouteau Avenue to Union Pacific Right-of-Way

Of the general comments received, most respondents were positive about the alternative noting that it
serves the Latino community, Some questioned whether or not this alternative was the most feasible
alternative to build due to cost.

Southside – Gravois Avenue to Union Pacific Right-of-Way

Of the general comments received, most respondents expressed that this alternative was the best one for
the Southside. Respondents liked Gravois because it has a wide street, the population is dense and there
is an opportunity to reduce vehicular traffic. Respondents also felt it would be the least complicated to
develop.

Southside – Chouteau Avenue to Grand Avenue

Of the general comments received only one respondent expressed that the alternative is not good. The
respondent felt that Grand is too narrow. Respondents in favor of Grand noted the access to St. Louis
University; to work and area grocery stores.

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

10
Southside – Bus Rapid Transit along Union Pacific Right-of-Way

Of the general comments received respondents favored this alternative. One respondent felt that it would
be a short-term solution while another felt if it were built it would meet the least resistance.

Downtown – 9th/10th One-Way Pair Couplet

Of the general comments that were received all of the respondents liked this alternative. One of the
respondents liked this option because it is not as close to the existing MetroLink.

Downtown – Olive/Chestnut Single Track Loop

Of the general comments received only one respondent was not in favor of this alternative. The
respondent felt it is too close to the stadium and duplicates service to the area that is already served by
MetroLink.

Public Involvement

The public involvement questions asked participants to describe themselves and how they learned about
the meetings. Participants were also asked to rate the meetings according to the information provided.
Below are the results. Appendix E outlines additional verbatim comments from respondents.

Stakeholder type:
54% Resident 5% Business Owner
15% Nearby Property Owner 5% Elected Official
15% Frequent Traveler 2% Other

How did you hear about the meeting:

43% Community Organization 2% Neighbor
28% Other 2% Public Official
4% Flyer 0% Co-worker
4% Newsletter 0% Email
4% Newspaper ad 0% Website
2% Friend

The information provided was:

58% Very Useful 42% Useful 0% Not Very Useful

In general, the meeting was:

54% Well Worth Attending 43% Worth Attending 3% Not Worth Attending

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

11
Appendix A: Comment Form Document

Comment Form
Your input is central to this study’s success. Please take time to complete this comment form. Thank
you!

1. At station #5, we listed the reasons for transit improvements within the City of St. Louis as being
sustainable development, access to opportunity and safety and security. Have we correctly
identified your area’s transit needs?

Yes No

Comments:
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________

2. At station #6, we identified the screening criteria for the different study areas.
Please check the two criteria you think are most important to consider when evaluating the
Northside and Southside areas:

o Employment concentrations
o Population concentrations
o Transit-dependent market
o Sustainable development opportunities
o Capital cost

Please check the two criteria you think are most important for evaluating the downtown area:

o Ridership
o Development
o Costs
o Impacts

3. At station #7, you viewed the preliminary alternatives for each study area.
Please share your thoughts about each alternative below.

A. Northside – Natural Bridge Avenue

Comments:
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________

B. Northside – West Florissant Avenue

Comments:

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

12
 ________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________

C. Souththside – Chouteau Avenue to Union Pacific Right-of-Way

Comments:
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________

D. Southside – Gravois Avenue to Union Pacific Right-of-Way

Comments:

________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________

E. Southside – Chouteau Avenue to Grand Avenue

Comments:
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________

F. Southside – Bus Rapid Transit along Union Pacific Right-of-Way

Comments:

________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________

G. Downtown 9th/10th One-Way Pair/Couplet

Comments:
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________

H. Downtown Olive/Chestnut Single-Track Loop

Comments:

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

13
 ________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________

Public Involvement:
1. Which of the following best describes you? (please check all that apply)
Resident Elected Official
Business Owner Frequent Traveler
Adjacent Property Owner Other:

2. How did you find out about this Open House? (please check all that apply)
Newsletter Public Official
Flyer Friend
Web site Neighbor
E-mail Co-Worker
Newspaper ad Relative
Community Organization Other:

3. Please evaluate this open house by circling your answer to the following . . .
a. The information provided was:
Not Very Useful Useful Very Useful
1 2 3
b. The study team was:
Not Helpful Helpful Very Helpful
1 2 3
c. In general, the Open House was:
Not Well Organized Organized Well Organized
1 2 3

Not Worth Attending Worth Attending Well Worth Attending

1 2 3

7. Additional comments:

Thank You!
Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report
14
Appendix B: Verbatim Written Comments on Question 1, Transit Needs
1 That would be all the reasons that make ridership high and lasting.
2 Yes, basically I am concerned about the security measures.
Yes, finally a public transportation system that can be used by the public that will need it
3 most over the next 30 years.
The above comment is bothersome. I like the sustainable development part but not the rest.
4 It makes it seem as if without transit the city has no security or safety.
5 Anything that promotes the development of the city is great.
6 Very much interested in the development of the Natural Bridge Line.
I think the station location and access routes need to be as close as possible to current and
7 future activity centers.
Yes and no, I may ride this route but probably not very often. Would prefer light rail run in
8 my area.
9 We do not live or work in the city, so it doesn't apply.
10 Access for transit dependent market critical.
These lines in the city should be underground rather than routes down the street. There are
11 safety issues when running trains in traffic and pedestrians getting off the trains.
Stations should remain above ground. Underground stations undermine "safety and
12 security" of the alternatives.
Somewhat would be a better statement. Would like to see focus and care to making sure
13 current communities receive priority. I also might be reading this wrong.
Why are you bringing everybody downtown? We need more north and south rapid transit.
14 Majority of the northside does not work downtown they work south and in the suburbs.
15 I think that this is a good thing for the City.
At first I did not completely understand why they chose the areas they did. Then in the
16 presentation I learned that those places that they would put light rail were very prosperous
17 But safety and security will probably never happen.
18 I believe you all did what is needed.
19 Also, alternatives to automobile options
20 Very important
To a degree, safety and security are impacted by development but the way in which
individual stations are monitored also impacts sense of security and safety. Example: On-
21 site policemen or guards.
22 With an emphasis on access to opportunity.
It is important to provide transportation means to many diverse areas of the city due to the
23 irregular layout of the City. Also, you need to encourage redevelopment.
To move people toward transit as an option. Transit dependent markets - Is this not where
24 we want to end up?
25 I would change the word sustainable to attract new residents and riders.
Most people move to Chicago after college because of the transportation and great
26 downtown. That is what St. Louis needs to do.
27 Typical planning pabulum, but it will do.
The success of any rail line depends on discretionary travel. There is none to be expected on
the northside (past Crown Candy). Shouldn't this also be reflected in your reasons and thus
28 the likelihood of such private real estate investment?
29 Sustainable development would also help weave together neighborhoods.
Mostly, It's unfortunate that funding constraints limit a configuration which would benefit
30 more people along its entire length.

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

15
Appendix C: Summary of Written Comments on Question 3, Preliminary
Alternatives
Northside
Natural Bridge Avenue

Generally think alternative is good: 16

Generally think alternative is not good: 1

Oppose the alternative for stated reasons:

I don't think Florissant north of Natural Bridge is feasible, given the density of existing housing stock

Support the alternative for stated reasons:

• I think this is the better of the two. Hits employment & ridership (& their potential) well.
• Keeping the line on Natural Bridge as this area has the development.
• Best idea for north side since it goes through the middle of population.
• I think the Natural Bridge Ave. would be more feasible. First because of the street size, the
accessibility to connect with other bus/subway lines, neighborhood participation, businesses both
existing & developing ones and just using public transit versus automobiles.
• To service the most people I think the Northside - Natural Bridge would be the best.
• I can see that Natural Bridge might provide less disruption and implement the system. Presently
better bus service is needed.
• I think it would be very convenient to this highly populated area to be able to have a closer safer
mode of transportation than we have at present. Time saving, convenient and safer.
• Best route for population.
• This alternative makes the most sense in terms of population density and the eventual "cross
platform" connection to a Daniel Boone route to Chesterfield.
• Preferred to Florissant. Serves population areas.
• Preferred. Serves more of the population.
• Much better connection with north - south bus routes
• I totally agree with Natural Bridge route over W. Florissant. I drive on both roads daily. There
are many more people up & down Natural Bridge versus W. Florissant.
• While the impact on local community would be a concern, this is the best option due to ridership.
• Best choice - development opportunities & ridership make this a smart investment.

Considerations/suggestions:
• Better for community access. Poses serious safety issues.
• This is the best option. Please consider underground stations at the busiest corners. Do not short-
change the Northside transit facilities. Consider extending study area into Jennings. Doesn't it
also qualify as a distressed area?
• To be an effective system, I believe that all these areas should be linked to create a transportation
system that riders can easily use. The transport of the passengers should be fast enough to allow
them to reach their destinations within a reasonable time frame.
• You can do a combo of the two. Up Natural Bridge until about Union & the cut over to west
Florissant.
• Part of the reason that I can't catch the bus on Natural Bridge is because of the area it's linked to.
The most significant part of this project to me will be the outcome and change of the
neighborhoods involved.
• Do not extend onto Riverview. See attached information & map for my comments.
• I think the Federal office complex and Union 70 center are essential destinations for any
Northside alternatives.

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

16
 • Focus on TOD with developers, neighborhood organizations with metro/HNTB. Consider
limiting gentrification effects. Market rate/mixed income/affordable housing/bicycle & scooter
parking. Safety & security (bullet proof glass at stations).
• Fine as far as Salisbury and a P & R for McKinley Dr. no I-70 traffic, but unnecessary further
along N.B. why? The same can be done from the M.L. main using the TRRA tracks and a
transfer connection at Delmar. (This would not involve signals on mainline as separate track).

Question the alternative:

Maybe too close to existing line?

Oppose the alternative due to concern about street-running light rail:

Least feasible it being in the middle of the city may cause lots of chaos.

Support the alternative with street-running light rail:

• I noticed that the Natural Bridge alternative would be excellent - street much wider and cars could
continue on each side of street.
• Good wide street.
• The best. Nice that it can attract riders from both sides of the track. Wide road would be ideal
for a track for this system.
• I believe the Natural Bridge route is a better route to go with because of the space on both sides of
Natural Bridge. We have the space to do it. Let's do it please.
• Natural Bridge's width makes an ideal route for center of street R.O.W. This route would serve a
very public transport-dependent population.

Support the alternative for its economic development potential:

• This is the preferred route. Allows more TOD.
• Best alternative for redevelopment and serving transit-dependant populations
• Northside Natural Bridge Ave. good idea highly populated. Ridership would be good. Just OK
for developing cause area is already developed.
• Prefer this because of development opportunities. Ties better to current populations versus
benefiting commuters.
• The better of the two options, this option has the greater potential for serving the existing
community and spurring development.
• Greater development opportunities.
• Could be the configuration with the most economic potential.

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

17
Northside
Florissant Avenue

Generally think alternative is good: 5

Generally think alternative is not good: 10

Oppose the alternative for stated reasons:

• On a road to basically nowhere. Connecting at Natural Bridge is best.
• Not the best because ends up near cemeteries.
• Won't have as great of an impact as Natural Bridge.
• Better for visitors to cemeteries. Poses lesser service to residents.
• This is not a good option. North of Palm to about I-70, N. Florissant is way too narrow. Also,
nobody lives in a cemetery. I oppose this option. Although it is more direct, it would serve far
fewer people.
• Stick to Natural Bridge. Cemeteries & large spars populated industrial areas to east will not give
as many riders.
• This route is too far north.
• Too many cemeteries and parks limits TOD and not central to the area.
• Would have lower ridership.
• Not a good idea, too many non-populated areas. The transit system would run through - But very
good if the transit system in the future will run into north county areas.
• Not worried that cars would be limited, but worried the density & ridership is not there. Would
not prefer this.
• By the cemeteries where dead people lie? It might be good for tourists because those cemeteries
are beautiful.
• Route is all cemeteries.
• Sounds good with an ease of construction, but the low ridership, the narrow streets in the Hyde
Park "hood" and no place to put any "park and ride" lots, unless it was extended on west
Florissant to Northland shopping center.
• Not a good idea, a lot less populated are along the cemeteries.
• The cemetery concentration on the route minimizes the development options and serves a smaller
population concentration.
• 2 cemeteries, 1 park. Not enough ridership, not enough development.
• Would primarily cater to commuters to downtown, but limited due to feasible destinations.
• Less ridership.
• Due to the parks - development potential seems limited.

Support the alternative for stated reasons:

• Most feasible alternative less disruptive because its end of line is next to highway 70.
• Florissant Avenue's strength is being a more northward transport backbone. The area is also ripe
for redevelopment.

Considerations/suggestions:
• Natural Bridge first, then connect that line with the Florissant Ave.
• Preferred only for speed to N. County P & R and scenery. To make up for missed Natural Bridge
employers, use the line suggested above. TRRA from main line.

Question the alternative:

• Not bad but not sure if the ridership would be high enough.
• Narrow streets in many areas.

Oppose the alternative due to concern about street-running light rail:

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report
18
 • I would consider this my second choice as it would involve securing property for expansion of the
street.
• Too hard to come thru narrow area of Florissant.
• Too narrow.
• Why serve the cemetery corridor? And face the challenge of narrow streets?

Support the alternative with street-running light rail:

• The roads seem wide enough; in general for all of the alternatives I am concerned that the line
may make it more difficult to cross streets (like MetroLink on parts of Blvd.)
• Good wide street. Development potential. Need more detail about stations, etc.

Support the alternative for its economic development potential:

I think the cemeteries would be a great tourist destination, their accessibility from downtown would bring
visitors (and development) to this area.

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

19
Southside
Chouteau Avenue to UP Right-of-Way

Generally think alternative is good: 9

Generally think alternative is not good: 1

Oppose the alternative for stated reasons:

• It seems to be missing population centers.
• Weak for people access.
• Anything on Chouteau is a waste. Existing MetroLink is only two blocks north and it's mostly
industrial/SLV. Don't bother with this option. SLV has access to Grand MetroLink station.
• Using Chouteau seems to parallel the existing line too closely. New line should not run so near
existing outside of downtown.
• Not really necessary with the bus service on Grand.
• Worried about this alternative favoring commuters over city residents. Do not want a line
separate like current MetroLink.
• Too industrial.
• Not direct enough to matter. Stations could have negative impacts since they might not have
ideal locations using the UP RR intersections.
• Fewer opportunities for development.
• Chouteau corridor is heavily industrialized or full of vacant, formerly industrial sites. Rail
R.O.W. might have very little economic or development impact.
• Good because near Forest Park & Tower Grove and cuts through south side.

Support the alternative for stated reasons:

• I think that this line suggestion covers a bigger radius of downtown when considering where the
majority of people work.
• Would interfere the least with existing traffic.
• Best option for ridership. Increased future development in Shaw, Chouteau, etc. Could serve
existing transit-dependent users best.
• This would take me almost door to door from home to work downtown. Also using existing right
of way seems more efficient.
• Seems to be the most economical but would serve the need for speed north to south, rather than
serving the population centers of south city.
• Think this is best use of existing resources. Possibly least expensive and runs thru most heavily
populated area of potential riders.
• If not along I-55 or Broadway, this is the best to choose for south city. Some areas, especially
between Bates & Carondelet, are mostly residential. Should be no problem buying some business
property to make parking lots for stations.
• Acceptable, depending on where the stations would be.

Considerations/suggestions:
• Should definitely do Chouteau, all the way to city limit! Maybe it can connect to Maplewood
someday.
• Another option that would appeal to commuters with limited destinations along the rail road
track. Bus connectivity would be important.
• Light industrial corridor ripe for redevelopment mostly only one - two blocks wide. Pedestrian
corridors thru light industrial can be established. Purchasing run down light industrial for "park
& ride" cheaper than commercial/residential displacement. Already have "park & ride" at Shaw
& Vandeventer.
• Why Chouteau Ave? Best to realign existing train zone from Grand to Tucker. Put stations at
areas that serve Chouteau. This area would have transit to other links East, West & Northwest at

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

20
 Grand. Stays on existing right-of-ways - speed of transit - promotes ridership - make Grand
station an outer city HUB.
• Second best. Would improve significantly if it got closer to the Barnes campus, both to serve a
major employment center and to provide connections to points west using existing MetroLink and
bus lines.
• Why not DMU service?

Question the alternative:

Likely cheap to build & fast to the end line station. Seemingly difficult to connect with businesses.
Would likely change the areas closest to the stations?

Support the alternative for its economic development potential:

• I like this best. Gets people to employment or potential employment well.
• This would be number one. On the U.P. R.O.W. the speed of trains would be great! TOD
development will explode once this line is built!
• While the rail travels through industrial/commercial zoned areas - there are great opportunities for
development. Further, those areas are surrounded by densely populated residential areas.
• The U.P. R.O.W. would provide necessary speed and cut across many existing bus routes.
Industry is dying in America. In the future, these areas will be abandoned and in need of
reinvestment. This would open up LARGE areas for NEW INVESTMENT! Plan for tomorrow,
not for today!!!
• Good route. Perfect building block. Many under-used commercial properties along alignment.
Ripe for redevelopment.

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

21
Southside
Gravois Avenue to UP Right-of-Way

Generally think alternative is good: 10

Generally think alternative is not good: 3

Oppose the alternative for stated reasons:

• Transit riders are served by buses well. They can commute well.
• Many businesses and potential ridership, but the line would have difficulty with all the
interchanges.
• Existing strong ridership of Gravois. Multiple express buses. Strong Gravois line. Option "C"
creates new opportunities - this just supplements existing service.
• Ignores heavily populated central, south-central city. However, could provide much needed TOD
to southeast city.

Support the alternative for stated reasons:

• This could work. Only problem is that a street line is already inherently slower so almost all
U.P., although circuitous would be made up with higher speeds.
• Like this better. Closer to Grand than "C".
• Probably the best Southside option. Would hit many areas that would provide high ridership.
Traffic would be a concern, ie: how fast would it be?
• Best of the bunch. Provides a direct connection to downtown for county dwellers and should spur
redevelopment along Gravois. Would be improved by a rail connection to the new Shrewsbury
station as well as an extension further south.
• Best choice! Good East/West bus connections. Gravois is ready to redevelop - low risk & lots of
nearby neighborhoods would benefit.
• This section is providing convenience for people to go to work and grocery stores every day.
• This serves the Latino community.
• This one seems to be a very good one.
• Most accessible and least complicated.
• I believe that this alternative would be the best for the Southside as it covers the most populated
area.
• I like the fact it leads straight to downtown and has enough space for the Metro; big population.
• Because Gravois is a wide street, building tracks would not contribute to the shrinkage of the
driving area, and also because along this route, the population is dense, the car traffic would be
reduced as well.

Considerations/suggestions:
• This is probably the best option of all! However, Gravois is kind of narrow from Grand to
Meramec. Could consider routing via much wider S. Grand and Chippewa West to Uprow. Lots
of people do now ride buses on these corridors already to get downtown. Need underground stop
at Grand & Gravois.
• I prefer this route but needs to be underground. Allows more TOD.
• Better you don't always have to have park & ride … to make a line successful. This is a heavily
populated area.
• I think the high ridership on Gravois may be better served by express bus lanes.
• Diagonal large intersections confusing.
• Gravois Ave. will require lots of traffic realignment = high cost!
• Complicated intersections should not be an issue. That happens everywhere in Europe.

Oppose the alternative due to concern about street-running light rail:

• This route seems too crowded for Gravois Avenue.
• Prefer this because it will change the way Gravois develops and will greatly reduce car traffic.
Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report
22
 • This loses the Hill since it's more out of the way to pick it up then to drive downtown. Also
dense traffic would slow the train significantly.
• Not bad, but having to cross a busy street to board a train doesn't appeal.
• Good area to serve but I fear that traffic density will slow development of this route.
• Won't work - too congested.

Support the alternative with street-running light rail:

• Wide street - near population & businesses
• Gravois route from downtown is a nice direct route going south. Gravois is wide enough to
handle the trains. To answer the concern of all major intersections you go underground or above
the major intersection.
• Again, economically a more viable option due to size of highway. Also serves a core
concentration. The right-of-way issue is important as a consideration, but I don't think it should
eliminate this option. Would be a great boost to economize development along this route.

Support the alternative for its economic development potential:

• Going down Gravois serves a large population base. Gravois, while a large auto-oriented street,
has many large opportunities on or within a few blocks of the street.
• Could really help develop Southside.
• This would encourage reinvestment on Gravois and hopefully promote commercial development.
• Despite the intersection obstacles - this is just beginning to be built. I think it would create a lot
of development & draw white-collar riders.

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

23
Southside
Chouteau to Grand

Generally think alternative is good: 12

Generally think alternative is not good: 7

Oppose the alternative for stated reasons:

• Nice but poses new traffic problems.
• Grand is too narrow & too busy now, and just put in planters down the middle on same blocks.
• Do not prefer because this can be serviced by buses and light rail is too heavy for this area. Buses
or streetcars would be better.
• On Chouteau Ave. too close to existing alignment.
• I think this would be too disruptive to the south Grand area (I live there), without the added
ridership of the Gravois alternative.
• Grand has too many restrictions and already has highest bus route ridership. Due to the parks,
development potential seems limited.
• Grand is too narrow.

Support the alternative for stated reasons:

• Good use of rail tracks. Hits backside of Tower Grove Park.
• I like this because it is more pedestrian-friendly, lots of places to go to and lots of people live
around there. St. Louis U, Tower Grove Park, S. Grand restaurants.
• Best option for ridership. High density area for pedestrians. Does it best serve existing transit
dependent users?
• Capitalizes on existing development & population densities. Will be successful. Even in the
"tight" portion it will slow traffic benefiting businesses and pedestrians.
• I like this option provided that the proposed rail line on Grand does not have traffic problems.
• Very agreed because the MetroLink goes through St. Louis University.
• Seems more accessible than other routes, that is, more prone to attracting clientele.

Considerations/suggestions:
• South Grand is too narrow to run transit buses, if it were underground it would serve more riders.
• Great if you can get it down the constraints on S. Grand.
• I like this idea the most in that it serves as existing community and well developed commercial
centers. Long-term, though, the right-of-way impact could be detrimental to the traffic flow on
the narrow stretch south of Arsenal. Is it feasible to do two single tracks south of Arsenal, one
running one block east of Grand?
• South Grand is well-served by transit; transit would not encourage anything new here. A separate
study should look at a line that goes from north city to south city entirely along Grand.

Oppose the alternative due to concern about street-running light rail:

• I don't think Grand Avenue is wide enough, although, if it cuts down traffic it may do some good.
• Doesn’t sound practical because of car congestion and it is a main thoroughfare.
• Problem with Grand is it is narrow and crowded in many parts, would not want to lose street
parking in Grand South Grand area - commercial area depends on it too.
• Traffic on Grand Ave. is already crowded.
• Grand Ave. seems too narrow & too crowded.
• This is the "bad news" light rail route. Grand is too narrow as a street!
• Seems a good mix of the 2 alternatives above except street is too narrow. Don't like to see people
lose their parking from in front of their homes.
• Perfect area to serve but Grand Avenue is not wide enough to allow it without elevated line.
• Definitely too congested.
• The traffic changes to Grand might kill the existing redevelopment. Not direct enough.
Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report
24
Support the alternative for its economic development potential:
I think this is best choice for increasing city residents who use transit instead of driving where they need
to go. I think this would help neighborhood development in this area.

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

25
Southside
Bus Rapid Transit Along UP Right-of-Way

Generally think alternative is good: 7

Generally think alternative is not good: 25

Oppose the alternative for stated reasons:

• No more buses, please.
• Stick with rail transit - BRT will not produce redevelopment.
• Won't support redevelopment.
• NO! Bus improvements should be part of another study; buses will not promote new ridership or
investment. Diamond lanes are important, but not in place of light rail.

Considerations/suggestions:
• Don't bother with BRT along UP R.O.W. If you want BRT, make it dedicated bus lanes on or
adjacent to I-55.
• Don't like the bus rapid transit unless there are longer buses or very frequent buses.
• Could this be done in addition to the Chouteau-Grand alignment?

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

26
Downtown
9th/10th One-Way Pair/Couplet

Generally think alternative is good: 12

Generally think alternative is not good: 8

Oppose the alternative for stated reasons:

• I like the access/proximity to Washington. But it runs along the existing MetroLink, we don't
really need that.
• Seems to mirror current MetroLink too much going north/south.
• Downtown should have a cross shape route. Incorporate both couplets into a single line.
• Closer to jobs/entertainment. Cons: difficult to tap Washington Ave. residential population.
• Less desirable - essentially parallels existing MetroLink service, limited possibilities for 3 and 4-
car trains.
• Both DT route do not provide service to western DT/Jefferson Ave.

Support the alternative for stated reasons:

• This makes the most sense of all! Trains can continue moving. It also serves the Convention
Center (all of downtown), near the Busch Stadium, a shuttle bus to the Arch, connectivity to
MetroLink, Amtrak, Greyhound, and Savvis Center!

Question the alternative:

• Will this serve the newly developed Washington and district?
• Is there a need for a couplet so close to the MMC or existing Convention Center steps?
• What about when parades shut down these streets?
• Both downtown plans could be very useful with extended hours and frequent trips. A lack of one
or the other could make it pointless, as MetroLink penetration in that area is already good, in
addition to many buses. I don't really prefer one plan to the other.

Considerations/suggestions:
• Downtown is walkable from most existing stations. The new lines should look to expand the
downtown in growth, either in new buildings or residential/commercial development.
• This pairing is great! Consider a northern entry to downtown via Mullarphy/13th/Cass instead of
Convention. Or maybe Cole Street. But I like the 9th/10th pairing - nice connections to existing
MetroLink.
• Could be routed to the wider streets in this area.

Question the alternative:

Both downtown plans could be very useful with extended hours and frequent trips. A lack of one or the
other could make it pointless, as MetroLink penetration in that area is already good, in addition to many
Metrobuses. I don't really prefer one plan to the other.

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

27
Downtown
Olive/Chestnut Single-Track Loop

Generally think alternative is good: 18

Generally think alternative is not good: 7

Oppose the alternative for stated reasons:

• Downtown is walkable from most existing stations. The new lines should look to expand the
downtown in growth, either in new buildings or residential/commercial.
• No good. Too slow, just like existing downtown bus loop routing. Why Chestnut? Market is
much wider. Also, lacks good access to Busch Stadium - remember it is farther south than it used
to be!
• Downtown seems very well served already. Only MetroLink development needed is to hook up
to line expansion leaving the central business district.

Support the alternative for stated reasons:

• Would be good because it goes farther into downtown - reaching the financial district at
Broadway plus serving retail - Macy's, St. Louis center redevelopment. Auto traffic must remain
on the streets. Transit only "malls" kill streets and retail.
• Preferable because it improves development opportunities west of 14th.
• Prefer because it stretches farther west and seems to compliment current metro better.
• Still close to stadium, lofts, and businesses.

Considerations/suggestions:
• I prefer this over the other option, but why are we running the bus down 14th instead of 8th and
connecting the north-south lines underground. Don't like trains competing with traffic.
• This might entail security issues with the court if appeals in the OPO.
• Your have ruled out Locust completely? Not so long ago it was ruled by buses and would have
made a good transit way.

Question the alternative:

• Both downtown plans could be very useful with extended hours and frequent trips. A lack of one
or the other could make it pointless, as MetroLink penetration in that area is already good, in
addition to many metrobuses. I don't really prefer one plan to the other.

Oppose the alternative due to concern about street-running light rail:

• Single narrow streets to be recognized.
• Downtown needs all of the East/West arterials. Taking Olive & Chestnut would really mess with
traffic.

Support the alternative for its economic development potential:

I think this alignment serves more of the downtown area. Could increase development of old buildings
on 14th

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

28
Appendix D: Verbatim Written Additional Comments

1 What considerations would be taken for a possible earthquake and its effect on the MetroLink?
Looking forward to when these plans become a reality. This is much needed in St. Louis
especially with so much development going on in the downtown, northside and southside
2 areas.
3 It was nice to be able to attend the forum. It was informative.
4 Please hurry and build it.
Room was to hot. Also, maybe you will get more actual riders to attend if you give out
5 meeting notices on the buses and light rail trains. Thanks, helpful meeting.
St. Louis needs transit 24-hour in some areas. The airport is open 24-hours there should be
6 Metro service to the airport 24-hours a day.
In general the study team seemed very adept at not really answering the questions more at
giving put answers. The information looks good on paper but more should be done to make
this happen now and not waste so much time studying things. Take the decisions out of the
7 politician’s hands and make one entity in charge to get the work done.
I am not crazy about the ground level trains. It seems to me that with theses idiot drivers in St
8 Louis that would invite a lot of accidents.
More space should have been provided for viewing each proposed site. We were too cramped
for good observation. At least we saw some thinking about the future of St Louis. Whether
Americans like it or not the whole human race may have to change from cars to something
else. If people would study oceanography they would see how the planet is put together and if
they studied astronomy they would see how dependent this planet is upon what is around us in
9 the universe.
10 Need greater rail access on new routes through established neighborhoods.
Needed more visible meeting location with more space. At least signs in the building lobby or
11 indication of meeting location on the 2nd floor would help.
Light rail is a wonderful idea, because it is safer. The problem with the MetroLink is that
certain areas where you have to catch it do not feel comfortable. It is not safe. It seems like it
12 will get you home sooner.
I live in Kirkwood and I am in a sales capacity that takes me all over the city. I would not use
public transportation except for recreation. My mother lives in South St. Louis and she does
not drive and relies on MetroLink. There are very few bus routes in her area to get her places.
Call a ride has been a nightmare. I would like to see more accessibility for seniors like my
13 mother.
I wish you people would consider another option which is running these trains underground. I
know it costs more and takes more time but great cities have subway systems like Paris,
London and NY City. These places took decades and spent billions building their systems.
Not once has the public been given the option of spending more money and taking more time
to have it built underground. I don't take any pride in building the cheapest system money can
buy. Do you think anyone is impressed with the view from the LWE Station to Union Station
riding through warehouses and freight yards? See the public on taking pride and build a first
14 class transit system.
Leave the buses alone, you guys have created the worst mess for trying to fix something that
15 really wasn't broken. It seems like you always take the main routes and mess them up.
16 Noise in presentation room made it difficult to hear.
Residents will have more input when you get to the details of the location of the stations, street
17 closings and etc..
I can't wait! Great job in researching and taking into consideration the needs of the community.
18 I appreciate the thought behind the proposed routes.
I want to be more involved. Please place me your email list. I have a lot of experience dealing
19 with transit [email protected]. Also, not everyone works downtown. Look around,
Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report
29
 the workers of downtown are not representative of the northside.
I think the MetroLink rail would be more comfortable, safer, and quicker than our present
20 transportation.
The people at the open house were very organized and helpful. Everyone knew what they
21 spoke about and they were very knowledgeable of the study.
22 Richard Dockett 401-0452 - Attached flyer - Create more jobs for local black workers
Map attached - If Riverview is no longer being considered then go out Natural Bridge and go
right on Goodfellow to just south of Hwy 70. The Hampton bus would connect to the Baden
23 area.
24 Please expand MetroLink ASAP!
25 Keep doing a great job, please. God loves you all.
The central corridor which includes Forest Park SE and "Botanical Heights", Shaw and other
residential and commercial/retail outlets is and has been experiencing significant growth. It is
26 anticipated that over 2,000 new jobs will be located in this area in the next 6 to 8 years.
How will the study solicit comments from a larger population of transit dependent users? Will
27 these new systems have limited service or 24 hour runs?
28 How about a new name for these lines? The initials TRAM - The River Area Metro.
29 Impressive work, presentation well done.
30 I am encouraged by the thoroughness with which the study is being considered.
Build MetroLink above highway 40 when they redo 40. Do it while the road is under
construction instead of waiting for later. Connect new MetroLink with more existing Metro
31 stops now. Example: Chicago has different trains red/blue/green that all run on the same track.
Doing a good job in sharing information and explaining the industry-specific language. I
might recommend a video of the various routes especially showing key intersections to assist
in sparking recognition of known sites and explaining lesser known options, especially
32 regarding lines running along existing rail lines.
It is taking too long to get this finished! At the current rate of progress, St. Louis could be a
ghost town by the time the first train is running, negating the need for large transportation
33 expenditure.
34 Good Luck!
Basch Brewery and NGA together have over 6,000 employees. I am surprised that a route
down very wide Broadway or along I-55 continues to be ignored. None the less expand
35 ASAP. Thank you and God Bless You!
Very glad to see the effort to improve public transportation in St. Louis. Please get this
information out to those who would use it. The more current MetroLink/bus riders know this
36 information and can make an opinion the better.
37 Very general. Need free downtown zone.
We need money. The Council of Governments should speed MetroLink development along by
securing funding now. We should not be dependent on federal funds. Our federal government
is being run into the ground. The Council of Governments should lobby the State to allow
38 highway funds to be used for light rail.
Great presentation, loved it. Very organized and professional. Serviced educated audience -
39 What about other demographics?
1. I understand the funding constraints of having to stay within the city limits, but ultimately
this needs to function as a regional system. 2. The transit goals seem to be fuzzy - move people
downtown? Improve overall bus operations? Spur redevelopment? Serve local businesses
and residents (replacing one or more local bus routes) or to move commuters quickly through
the city? 3. There needs to be a substantial supply of visible accessible parking at the end of
the line stations or anyplace the line crosses and Interstate. 4. Staying on 14th St. at South out
of downtown would be preferable to tucker, at least thru the existing MetroLink station on
14th. 5. Ken makes a better door than a window he needs to be aware of where he's standing
40 relative to the audience and the screen. 6. Running light rail counter to existing one-way
Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report
30
 traffic downtown improves safety see Denver's system.
Evaluate MetroLink for my ease of rolling a wheelchair or scooter off without reliance on the
41 mechanical lift of a bus. The center of the road ROW routes seem to call for unreliable lifts.
An alternative of streetcars should have been proposed. Streetcars can be built to operate fast.
Also developers should be partnered for any new line. A street car in 5 years will get a lot
42 more for such partners that a possible light rail bus in 20 years.
South city residents will embrace rail quickly. Gravois will rebound - rail will break up the
wide expanses of pavement and make it a more pedestrian friendly environment. I would
43 expect small and mid-size development to begin on Gravois before we break ground.
44 I really enjoyed the opportunity to ask questions of the people involved in this project.

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

31
Appendix E: Limited-English Verbatim Written Comments

Generally speaking, these cover pretty much everything. Perhaps language/communication issue
1 may be added or addressed as a sub-category of security.
2 They provided safety information
I have no ideas about the project’s details. However, I think there is a need of it. I want to know if
3 you have planned the system for none English users in case of emergency.
I want to know if you have planned the system for none English users in case of emergency when
4 using transit.
We urgently need the authorities to expand the Metrolink system along schools (high-school,
elementary, college) especially colleges, hospitals, business sections, and along the streets in the city
safely. It is very necessary for residents when they need the means of transportation to go to school,
5 to work and to do business, etc. We also need the Metrolink direct downtown to airport.
I believe that this type of transportation would be good because of the speed of transport of workers
6 to their work places, while the number of cars would be lowered on those routes.
7 High cost of gasoline.
I believe that such availability of public transportation will greatly improve the quality of life for
8 many in St. Louis.

Summary of Written Comments on Question 3

Northside
Natural Bridge Avenue

Generally think alternative is good: 6

Generally think alternative is not good: 0

Support the alternative for stated reasons:

• There are plenty of land for construction.
• Looking at cost as well as mass transit dependent population, Natural Bridge might be a good
choice.

Question the alternative:

• Are these the most traveled routes or more feasible to construct?

Northside
Florissant Avenue

Generally think alternative is good: 5

Generally think alternative is not good: 1

Support the alternative for stated reasons:

• Good way to link with inner city and highway.

Question the alternative:

• Are these the most traveled routes or more feasible to construct?

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

32
Southside
Chouteau Avenue to UP Right-of-Way

Generally think alternative is good: 9

Generally think alternative is not good: 0

Support the alternative for stated reasons:

• This area is used by the Latino community.

Question the alternative:

• Are these the most traveled routes or more feasible to construct?

Southside
Chouteau to Grand

Generally think alternative is good: 17

Generally think alternative is not good: 1

Support the alternative for stated reasons:

• Very agreed because the MetroLink goes through St. Louis University.
• Seems more accessible than other routes, that is, more prone to attracting clientele.
• Grand is most likely the most used route.

Considerations/suggestions:
• Are these the most traveled routes or more feasible to construct, ?

Southside
Bus Rapid Transit Along UP Right-of-Way

Generally think alternative is good: 9

Generally think alternative is not good: 0

Considerations/suggestions:
• Are these the most traveled routes or more feasible to construct?
• This may be a short-term solution.
• This is a good option.

Southside
Gravois Avenue to UP Right-of-Way

Generally think alternative is good: 10

Generally think alternative is not good: 0

Support the alternative for stated reasons:

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report
33
 • This section is providing convenience for people to go to work and grocery stores every day.
• This serves the Latino community.
• This one seems to be a very good one.
• Most accessible and least complicated.
• I believe that this alternative would be the best for the Southside as it covers the most populated
area.
• I like the fact it leads straight to downtown and has enough space for the Metro; big population.
• Because Gravois is a wide street, building tracks would not contribute to the shrinkage of the
driving area, and also because along this route, the population is dense, the car traffic would be
reduced as well.
• Lower cost and higher number of riders.
• This possibly will meet the least resistance.

Considerations/suggestions:
• Are these the most traveled routes or more feasible to construct?
• It would be helpful to have signage as well as 'figures' / drawings / non-word indications.

Downtown
9th/10th One-Way Pair/Couplet

Generally think alternative is good: 6

Generally think alternative is not good: 0

Support the alternative for stated reasons:

• It is so convenient to build.
• I like this option because the other one is very close to the existing MetroLink.

Question the alternative:

• Are these the most traveled routes or more feasible to construct?

Downtown
Olive/Chestnut Single-Track Loop

Generally think alternative is good: 2

Generally think alternative is not good: 1

Oppose the alternative for stated reasons:

• There is already a MetroLink close to Stadium and that whole area, so I would not support this
option.

Question the alternative:

• Are these the most traveled routes or more feasible to construct?

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

34
 Northside-Southside
Transit Improvements Study

Final October 2006

Station Planning Workshops’
Comment Summary Report

Submitted By:
Vector Communications
December 21, 2006
 October 2006 Station Planning Workshops Comment Summary Report
Northside-Southside Transit Improvements Study
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

At station planning workshops held October 24-26, 2006 as part of the

Northside-Southside Transit Improvement Study, the public gave its
input on the final set of light rail alternatives, station locations and
potential development opportunities for North St. Louis, South St.
Louis and downtown. The objectives of the workshops were to gather
input on:

• The final Detailed Alternatives;

• Land use planning principles and practices; and
• Proposed station locations and area plans.

More than 80 people attended the three workshops, which focused on

the alternatives in each of the study area corridors. Attendees viewed
project information and heard a presentation on station design and
land use before breaking into working groups. Study team members
led the work group discussions where attendees participated in station
planning. After that activity, an attendee gave a brief summary of his
or her group’s discussion. Several observations resulted from the
discussions:

• Station Locations:
o Consider station locations in both the median as well as
curbside;
o Consistently place stations between ¼ to ½ mile apart;
o Locate stations closer to existing MetroLink in the
downtown area;
o Locate stations near bus stops and street parking in North
and South St. Louis; and
o Consider potential locations on the Northside: at Natural
Bridge/Shreve, 14th/Cass and Natural Bridge/Vandeventer,
and on the Southside: at UPRR/Kingshighway,
Chouteau/Compton, Gravois/Jefferson, near South Grand
o hospitals and Saint Louis University.
• Station Design:
o Request to make stations transparent for safety;
o Expressed concern about the safety of children and seniors
crossing the street to access the stations;
October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report
2
 o Expressed concern about the safety of vehicles making left
turns; and
o Expressed concern about emergency vehicle accessibility,
signalization and speed of trains.

• Station Look:
o Make stations context sensitive so they do not overshadow
existing structures; and,
o Provide protection from the elements.
• Land Use:
o Prefer mixed-use, high density land uses in all corridors;
o Desire pedestrian and neighborhood-friendly development;
o Prefer more service-oriented and commercial
development; and,
o Prefer parking/park-and-ride lots at appropriate locations.
• Alignments:
o Would like a larger east-west loop in downtown;
o Like the alignments that use the Union Pacific Railroad
(UPRR) although there is concern about use of the UPRR
right-of-way; and,
o Like street running on wide streets that connect to vital
neighborhoods.

Thirty-eight comment forms were completed at the workshops.

Several conclusions can be drawn from the comments:

• Two-thirds of the attendees (66%) said the stations are

correctly located.
• More than half of the attendees (60%) felt the station designs
in terms of sidewalk access, safety and traffic worked for their
neighborhood.
• Many noted that they liked the glass and steel look of the
transit shelter examples because it is consistent with the
existing system, modern, transparent and seems easier to keep
clean.
• There was the feeling that stations should not distract from the
neighborhoods but instead “fit in” with the existing look.
• Most attendees expressed a need for higher density and mixed-
use development in all three corridors – Northside, Southside
and downtown.
• Several downtown attendees suggested limiting additional
parking.

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

3
• In both North and South St. Louis, comments for residential
services such as and community-oriented businesses were
noted.

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

4
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROCESS

The purpose of community engagement is to ensure that the public

and all interested agencies: actively participate in the Northside-
Southside Transit Improvements Study process; are fully aware of the
decision-making process for determining which transit improvements
should be implemented; and to educate and initiate support on general
concept, such as street-running light rail transit (LRT). This section
documents the different approaches and tools used to encourage
workshop attendance.

A major component of the outreach strategy study team members

presentations announcing the workshops and giving an update on the
study. Presentations were made to neighborhood associations, local
business groups, community leaders and government and elected
officials. A variety of approaches were employed for engaging
residents and stakeholders to participate including:

• Development of a mailing list comprised of nearly 2,000

residents and business owners using the outreach briefing sign-
in lists. These individuals received study newsletters through
the mail announcing public involvement activities and project
updates.

• Distribution of an electronic meeting announcement via email to

more than 600 recipients. The database was also compiled
using the outreach briefing sign-in list.

• Placement of advertisements in area newspapers including the

Arch City Chronicle, La Voz (Spanish newspaper), North City
Suburban Journal, Petra Strana (Bosnian newspaper), South City
Suburban Journal, Southwest Suburban Journal, St. Louis
American and the St. Louis Argus.

• Distribution of more than 400 meeting flyers to study-area

residents and business owners at briefings held at their meetings
since July 2006.

• Placement of more than 50 posters at study information sites,

neighborhood association offices and other community meeting
locations.

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

5
 • Placement of meeting announcements on the entire Metro Bus
fleet and MetroLink light rail cars, for a total of more than 2,000.

• Translation of meeting announcements in Arabic, Bosnian, Dari,

Spanish and Vietnamese. More than 1,000 of these flyers were
distributed to students and their families who participate in the
St. Louis Public School’s English as a Second Language Program
and at the ethnic meetings held at the International Institute.

• Participation at the International Institute’s Prosperity Fair,

informing new immigrants and local businesses in South St.
Louis of the study.

• Placement of more than 10,000 flyers on doors within a half mile

of the Natural Bridge Alternative in North St. Louis.

The Station Planning Workshops were held on three consecutive days,

October 24-26, 2006 at the St. Louis Regional Chamber and Growth
Association’s office in downtown; Lift for Life Academy lin South St.
Louis; and, at Fifth Missionary Baptist Church in North St. Louis.. The
meeting sites were selected because of their location along or near the
alignments under consideration.

While extensive steps were taken to encourage workshop attendance,

the meetings ended up falling on the same three dates a 2006 World
Series games in St. Louis. Thus, it is likely that the World Series
impacted workshop attendance.

METHODOLOGY

The Station Planning Workshops were held as a part of the

development of the detailed alternatives. Eighty-two people attended
the workshops. Upon arrival, participants were asked to locate their
residence and place of employment on a study area map. Meeting
participants identified 29 residences and 31 places of employment
within the study area.

At this second round of open houses, the public was able to view
background information and to hear about station design and land-use
policies from the study team during a brief presentation. Following the
presentation, attendees split into work groups to participate in a 90-
minute station planning activity.

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

6
Although the same content was presented at each meeting, the focus
was on the alternatives that served the area in which the workshop
took place. At the Downtown and Southside meeting, the groups were
alternative specific. Since the Northside has only one alternative, the
Natural Bridge Avenue alignment, attendees were asked to participate
in the group that focused on the stations about which they were most
interested. Thus, this alternative was divided by groups of stations
located between Cass and W. Florissant, W. Florissant and
Kingshighway and Kingshighway and Interstate 70. Study team
members facilitated the station planning activity, while other team
members took notes of the discussion. A participant from each group
was selected to give a brief summary of his or her group’s discussion.
Actual notes from the station planning activity and group discussion
review are included in this report’s appendices.

A comment form was distributed to attendees as they entered the

workshop. They were asked to complete the form on-site. Thirty-eight
comment forms were collected. Since the conclusion of the
workshops, more than 20 communications have been received in the
form of letters, telephone calls and emails.

COMMENTS

The following provides a summary of feedback compiled from the

comment forms and the station planning work groups. In keeping with
the organization of the comment form, the results are discussed in the
following order: station location, station design, station look, public
involvement and other comments. A copy of the comment form is
attached as Appendix A. Actual verbatim responses are included in
Appendix B. There are not an equal number of responses for each
question because some attendees did not complete all questions.

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

7
Station Locations

One of the primary objectives for the workshops was to determine if

participants felt that the proposed stations for the detailed alternatives are
located in the right places. As indicated in Exhibit 1, slightly more than two-
thirds of those who responded (66%) felt the stations are correctly located.
The people who responded “no” were asked to suggest other station locations,
and almost everyone provided a comment. Comments from the individuals
who like the station locations expressed support for the specific proposed
locations and the alignments being considered. Those who did not like the
proposed locations suggested station locations closer to 8th and Pine, at
Lafayette and Tucker, and in the loft district in downtown St. Louis; Shreve,
Vandeventer, St. Louis Avenue in North St. Louis; and, 16th and Chouteau and
Kingshighway in South St. Louis.

Comments recorded during the station planning activity were

summarized by meeting location. As indicated below, the comments
duplicate some of those noted on the comment form. However, many
do not. This is not surprising. The study team had hoped the dialogue
during the group discussion would serve as a catalyst for exchanging
October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report
8
ideas that had not been previously considered. Overall, all groups
commented on the distance between the stations and suggested
station location changes.

Downtown:

• Put stations in median;

• Move stations further apart from each other; and
• Move stations closer to existing MetroLink LRT.

Southside:

• Add stations at UPRR/Kingshighway, Chouteau/Compton and

Gravois/Jefferson;
• Eliminate UPRR/Southwest or UPRR/Arsenal station;
• Put stations curb-side instead of within median;
• Place stations within walking distance, they are too far apart
(especially between Chouteau and Russell);
• Need stations for hospitals and Saint Louis University;
• Approve all stations along the Jefferson/I-55 alignment; and
• Safety and visibility are important.

Northside:

• Put ¼ to ½ mile between stations, or make comparable to bus

stop distances;
• Consider adding stations at Natural Bridge/Shreve, 14th/Cass
and Vandeventer;
• Prefer St. Louis Avenue station over North Market but concerned
right-of-way is too narrow;
• Put stops near parking; and
• Coordinate bus routes and loading stops with LRT stations.

Station Design

As indicated in Exhibit 2, more than half of the attendees (60%) felt

the station designs--in terms of sidewalk access, safety and traffic--
work for their neighborhoods. A few comments were noted about the
center platforms not being pedestrian friendly. In addition, attendees
suggested the stations compliment their neighborhoods and not stray
too far from existing designs, are visible, well-lit and transparent.

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

9
The following is a summation of comments recorded in the working
groups by meeting location. Transparent shelters are viewed as a
safety measure in all three corridors. Since street running is a new
concept for the St. Louis area, it was not surprising that all groups
expressed concerns for both pedestrians and vehicles.

Downtown:

• Concerned about turning radius;

• Concerned about Busch Stadium pedestrian crossing;
• Concerned about tracks interfering with streets; and
• Need to address parking requirement.

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

10
Southside:

• Enclose shelters to protect from weather (block sun, wind and

rain);
• Consider allowing neighborhoods to help determine the design;
• Should have good visibility and accessibility;
• Provide visual cues for riders to locate stations;
• Separate cars and rail on the street;
• Concerned over using the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way;
and
• Concerned regarding left turns.

Northside:

• Concerned about removal of on-street parking;

• Provide lights with countdowns for ADA and pedestrians;
• Ensure trains adhere to posted vehicle street speeds;
• Concerned with emergency vehicle access;
• Concerned for children, pedestrians and cars crossing streets
and between stations;
• Provide shelters that are divided and cover much of platform;
and
• Well-lighted.

Station Look

In order to gather specific information about station features, study

team members asked attendees to comment on the look of the
proposed stations. Although some of the comments overlapped some
of the areas already addressed in the station design section, there
were two emerging themes. Many noted that they like the glass and
steel look because it is
consistent with the
existing system,
modern, transparent
and appears easier to
keep clean. Other
attendees prefer that
stations not detract
from their
neighborhoods and like
the look of brick.

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

11
Overall, the groups discussed having a context sensitive design.
However, some attendees support red brick in the neighborhoods but
not in the downtown area.

Downtown:

• Consider transparent architecture for safety; and

• Be context sensitive, no red brick.

Southside:

• Consider context sensitive design;

• Prefer transparent shelters for safety;
• Minimize the amount of metal;
• Consider a functional-forward looking design;
• Prefer amenities such as comfortable seating, heaters and
informational kiosk;
• Not in favor of vending machines and advertisements;
• Designs determined by the neighborhoods;
• Consider landscaping;
• Consider brick;
• Develop visual cues for
riders to locate stations;
and
• Use materials that are
easy to maintain and not
vandalize.

Northside:

• Consider functional
amenities such as
restrooms, parking and
heaters;
• Fit into community, do not
overshadow existing
structures;
• Like Red brick;
• Divide the shelter and
cover much of the
platform; and
• Well–lighted.

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

12
Transit-Oriented Development in Neighborhoods

Since light rail can help create development opportunities around

station locations, attendees were asked to comment about the type of
future development that would work best for their neighborhoods.
Most attendees expressed a need for higher density and mixed-use
development in all three corridors. Several downtown attendees
suggested limiting additional parking. In both North and South St.
Louis, support for residential services and community-oriented
businesses such as small grocery stores, restaurants, laundry and
cleaners, shoe repair, was noted. There was a general consensus that
additional retail stores would not be the preferred land-use.

The following is a summation by meeting location of comments

recorded in the working groups:

Downtown
• Desire specialty mixed-use;
• Need high density developments;
• Accommodate neighborhoods; and
• Do not put parking structures at all stations.

Southside
• Locate small park and ride lots at some stations;
• Add mixed-use and high density development;
• Add more services and commercial;
• Redevelop the area south of Schnucks at Missouri;
• Make pedestrian-friendly;
• Blend into the neighborhoods; and
• Consider Density, Diversity and Design Quality.

Northside
• Make light rail and bus transit the same regarding levels and
stations;
• Upgrade existing bus stops;
• Encourage more development/visibility on I-70 corridor;
• Discourage retail-type business, more community
enhancements;
• Provide community service businesses that bring money into the
neighborhood (Shreve to Jefferson);
• Determine development based on needs of the neighborhood;
• Prefer mixed-use;
October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report
13
 • Make pedestrian friendly; and
• Place park-and-ride at appropriate locations.

Public Involvement

In order to develop a profile of Station Planning Workshop attendees,

the last portion of the comment form collected information about the
attendee and provided an evaluation of the key aspects of the
workshops. Attendees were asked to describe their affiliation to the
study area; how they heard about the workshops; and, to rate the
success of the workshops.

Attendee Profile

As indicated in Exhibit 3, the workshop participants represented

people who live, work, and own property and are frequent transit
riders. More than half of the attendees (62%) reside in the study area.
Twelve percent of the participants are property owners, while another
10 percent of the respondents selected the provided “other” option.
The “others” said that they are a downtown employee, a developer, a
guide or a potential frequent transit user.

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

14
Workshop Notification

In an effort to gauge the success of community engagement, a

question under public involvement asked attendees how they found
out about the workshops (Exhibit 4). Flyers, email, community
organizations, and to a somewhat lesser extent, newsletters and the
website were the primary sources of meeting notification. Under the
“other” option, attendees wrote they attended the first open house,
found out at their church or saw a newspaper article.

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

15
Station Planning Workshop Information

A lot of information was covered during the two-hour workshop. The

same content was presented at each meeting; however, the focus was
on the alternatives that served the area where the workshop was held.
Most attendees indicated the information provided was useful. No one
felt the information was not useful (Exhibit 5).

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

16
Study Team

Members of the study team were on hand to answer questions, take

notes and facilitate the work groups. Attendees rated them on their
“helpfulness” during the workshop. On the whole, attendees indicated
the study team was helpful (Exhibit 6).

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

17
Workshop

The last two questions on the comment form asked attendees to rate
the workshops. It should be noted that the workshops were on the
evening of the 2006 World Series ball games held in St. Louis. The
results (illustrated in Exhibit 7) indicate that attendees felt the format
for the workshops was organized and worth attending.

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

18
Additional Comments

In order to identify issues or concerns not previously addressed in the

comment form, attendees were allowed to provide additional
comments. Such comments were coded and tabulated into general
categories. As Exhibit 8 indicates, the comments overlapped some of
the areas addressed in the comment form, but also identified some
issues, particularly those related to the specific alignments that were
not discussed elsewhere. There were many positive comments, but
criticism regarding areas not served by the proposed alignments and
accessibility concerns stand out. Getting more information about the
study was another frequent comment.

Exhibit 8
Comments

Comment Number of
Responses
Alignments 6
Workshop and Study Information 5
Accessibility 2

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

19
Appendix A – Comment Form

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

20
Appendix B

Question 1 - Station Location Verbatim Comments

Be sure stations near stadium my work well after game days & pedestrians don't
1 foul the line.
2 Concern for stadium (Clark & 11th) station/pedestrian access)
But I would regret having to move the Multi-Modal to adjust after all the time
3 taken to build multi-modal the first time!
Consider consolidating western loop stations to enable transfers for bypassing loop;
Washington at 14th is in major pedestrian traffic area and deserves an immediate
4 vicinity, very visible station.
5 Covers many areas left out of current line. Offers good cross-route options.
6 Need to have stations near the loft district
7 I particularly like the Garden location and the one at Arsenal.
Keep the one at Kingshighway and Southwest probably make more sense than
8 Arsenal does….
9 Add one at Lafayette for Lafayette Square.
10 Need station at Lafayette and Tucker

Stations along Jefferson provide great visibility, access and bus/cross connectivity.
I am not concerned about slow train movement because of the number of Jefferson
11 stations. I believe the amount of stations (several) is great.
This would be the best location. It would attract new people to the area. I would
not drive as much I live at Chippewa & Minnesota. Great access to the current
12 business & give people the chance to see the area.
13 One added on at Shreve.
The current study presented to us today was developed well and I feel that the
stations submitted are in a good location. More information is needed to make a
14 formal
The stations need to evaluate the disabled and elderly use and the feasibility for
15 them.
16 There should also be stations at Shreve and Natural Bridge.

17 At this point okay, but more communication and input than community is needed.
18 Vandeventer
I can't be at the Southside meeting but I think a station should be located at (or
19 between) 18th Street and Grafton Parkway on Chouteau for this line.
20 Closer to 8th and Pine MetroLink
Consider future development of future lines. Rather than trying to make the line
21 go "everywhere" leaves space for a future for a future corridor.
Favor 16th at Chouteau - closer to amenities; Southwest supports commercial
22 district closer to the hill.
23 I think there should be a station at Kingshighway.
24 It appears so - depends on traffic/development study.

25 St. Louis Avenue & Florissant is the best idea. The Cass & Florissant is great idea.

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

21
Question 2 - Station Design Verbatim Comments
Brick, stone, iron (look); no vending; wires connected to antique streetlights; motifs for
1 local area' kiosks.
Center platforms are not rider friendly and have a greater impact on the urban
environment. Since you appear to be eliminating all on street parking, I would prefer that
stations share the sidewalks along the curb line. Plus with curbside stations they can be
2 expanded to 3-and 4-car stations much more easily!
3 Common thread that says "Southside" but something unique for each stations.
Concerned about pedestrians having to cross streets tracks and deal with trains as well as
4 vehicles.
Cross transit opportunities; more potential for pedestrian back & forth, not just parallel to
MetroLink; also serves area not served by Metro bus - it uses Market, Broadway &
5 Washington.

Didn't see much. Existing systems authentic steel and glass genre is good urban fit. Stay
6 consistent with them. Do not neglect wither sheltering and visual transparency (safety).
For safety concerns I would rather have the stations go underground (like Skinker). I
7 know it costs more money but at what price is safety?
Gravois is a highway of cars. Unnecessary to have that many car lanes. PERFECT FOR
8 LIGHT RAIL.
I feel they need to make them well lighted. Make sure there are rails, is so kids do not
9 step in the streets or cars get on the tracks.
10 I like the idea so far. More information is needed.
11 I think so. I like the idea if landscaping. I think the extra cost is worth it. !Bricks!
12 Important to keep sidewalks & pedestrian access uncluttered.
13 Love some of the designs.
14 Most looked cheap!
15 Mostly yes, but don't stray too much way from existing styles.
16 Needs to be well lighted.
Not sure yet - don't really see the development in a safe matter that's a great concern.
17 Taking away from historic areas.
Stations should be made of a transparent material with plenty of lights and sitting so that
18 people inside can see out and people outside can see in. Warm in winter. (safe)
19 Stations that fit into the neighborhood.

20 Think trains could run in streetwise. Toronto streetcars. Pedestrian access from sidewalk.
21 To be determined.
22 Visibility, character and density of street names at stations are important.

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

22
Question 3 - Station Look Verbatim Comments
Anything other than the same old thing. The train itself doesn't look antique, why
1 should the stations?
As long as the stations do not distract from the surrounding with trash containers
2 and are kept clean.
3 Brick station goes with historical look.
4 Consistency is nice, as long as everything is up-to-date.
Consistent station appearance and design other identification of specific line and
economy in design and development. Each station could be accented with a
5 unique icon or motif to allow easy identification to riders.
6 I like the designs submitted. More information is needed.
7 I like the neat look of metal/glass (if possible). 1) enclosure. !Bricks!
I like the one that makes it transparent. Easy way to keep clean and access
8 available.
I prefer the context sensitive approach also having a consistent recognizable
9 design.
10 I wouldn't want them to interfere with the church & schools.
11 I'd rather have them underground.
12 It doesn't inhibit foot traffic
13 Like street level & middle of streets.
14 Low floor proper technology
15 Modern stations for a modern system.
16 More enclosed space - could be glass station safety issue.
17 Needs work.
18 Nice visual improvement
19 Okay
20 Prefer raw look of concrete & steel, and consistency with existing lines.
21 The design brings a nice appearance to the community.
22 The designs are pretty good.
23 They are nice. Please consider. Covered shelters and lighting.
Transparent & Minimalist is good - no need to make architectural "statement" in a
24 city which already has diverse architecture.
25 Utilitarian

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

23
Question 4 - Station Development Verbatim Comments
1 Dense, mixed-use development
2 Grocery stores, childcare, affordable housing, medical/dental practices.
3 Stop building downtown parking!
4 Continued mixed-use, office, pedestrian-oriented and no more parking.
5 Grocery, shopping and eating
6 High density, pedestrian oriented (street parking, storefronts), mixed-use
7 Higher density housing
8 More reliable public transportation.
9 No parking lots, mixed retail - residential-offices
10 Appropriate high er densities
Connect the vital neighborhoods! Services are needed. Plenty of housing exists.
11 I'd like more groceries; restaurants; Laundromats. I want to live in a city.
12 Mixed Use
13 Rehab existing shopping at Broadway.
2-5 story mixed-use development along Jefferson. Possibly institutional/destination
type development at Bayless (more suburban stations). Concentration of
neighborhood services and residential mixed use along Jefferson is of prime
14 importance.
Development that services needs of home: small groceries, dry cleaning, library,
15 transit oriented residential.
Single family homes and condo. Business opportunities that can help person from
16 having to drive to the store or business.
Cultural center, meeting places, coffee shops bur no retail. Perhaps use the land at
17 small army plant (federal government).
18 There is no certainty that this development will spawn opportunities for growth.
19 Housing stability
20 Money in the community, more business.
21 Business.
22 Businesses that are needed: food markets, shoe repair, drug store, etc.
I still haven't seen transit oriented development at existing stations. How about
23 some density?
24 May use office - regional employment
25 Retail

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

24
October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report
25
Additional Verbatim Comments

Thought about possibility of having a loop on 14thn the 9th/10th option. This might
1 accomplish goal of reaching people around 14th and Olive/Pine/Locust/Washington.
Scope of discussion was poorly defined, particularly regarding private
development/TOD and interaction with traffic flow, existing projects (e.g., I-70 LID,
2 traffic study).
RID in Denver has run into several instances where the LPA is to share ROW with
existing freight lines and the planners are just now finding out that UP will not allow
light rail vehicles to share the ROW, only heavier, more impact-resistant vehicles-
the result is the LRT remains, the technology, much more ROW will be required (for
greater physical separation) and will require (a lot more acquisition of private
3 property (not popular)!
4 Great job!
I would be a frequent traveler if you build it where I can use it! Put the trains
where you want to go, not where you maybe hope that someday someone might
want to go there. Plenty of room to develop in and around existing "thriving" by
5 STL standards-neighborhoods.
This route accomplishes the most for development, access, and ease. Also very
6 visible.
7 Just let me know when the next one will be and where - Thank you!
The Jefferson alignment seems to encourage the density & intensity of development
and usage that light rail is intended to create. Gravois seems to drift too far away
from the urban core (to the west) past Jefferson/Grand. Jefferson runs right
through the heart of promising and redeveloping neighborhoods. Get facilities to
8 encourage this growth.
Disabled - the bus service to long to walk to the MetroLink stations - how are the
9 disabled and the elderly to get to these points?
10 Getting the information for workshop out better (radio, TV)
I would like more information. I feel at some point your organization should make
an effort to discuss this plan with individual churches, business and organizations
11 directly impacted.
Doesn't serve the O'Fallon Park neighborhood. I'm better served catching the W.
Florissant bus downtown. I would waste my gas driving to Natural Bridge to catch
the train when I could walk to the W. Florissant and Adelaide bus stop on my
12 corner. This project reeks of eminent domain!!!
13 Came in too late….Good Luck. It all comes down to the money.
I think alignment supports existing hospital, garden, entertainment hub and
14 residential.
When Union Market was downtown people came from other districts to shop there
and then favored other business. When the vendors were forced out people
stopped coming and the businesses left. Residents and visitors should be able to
walk. Auto drivers should improve their manners-they are arrogant; some respect
pedestrians but too many do not; I have trouble when I get the walk sign because
15 auto drivers want that time too.

October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report

26
October 2006 Station Planning Workshops’ Comment Summary Report
27
 Northside-Southside
Transit Improvements Study

Final September-October 2007

Open Houses’
Comment Summary Report

Submitted By:
Vector Communications
October 31, 2007
Executive Summary
Sponsored by East-West Gateway Council of Governments, Metro and the Missouri Department
of Transportation, the “Northside-Southside Transit Improvements Study” was a planning study,
evaluating light rail and other transit improvements for sections of North St. Louis City, South St.
Louis City and downtown. The study has resulted in the recommendation of a locally preferred
alternative for the Northside, Southside and downtown areas, including station locations and
design, costs and benefits.

This report documents the public input gathered during the study’s final round of public
meetings held in September and October 2007. The meetings were held for the general public
and involved three open houses on three consecutive days, plus two meetings for the limited-
English speaking population. The same information was presented at each set of meetings. In
total, 124 people attended the general meetings and 27 people attended the limited-English
speaking meetings.

The primary focus of all the meetings was to present the evaluation results of the detailed
alternatives and get input on the study team’s recommendation of a locally preferred alternative.
In addition, attendees were asked to comment on the public involvement process

General Public Open Houses Summary

At the open houses, 63 percent of evaluation participants agreed with the results. This
agreement was particularly strong on the north and south sides. The locally preferred alternative
that was selected by the study team was supported by 60 percent of the attendees who
commented.

The majority of the open house attendees were local residents. Open house participants were
primarily made aware of the open houses through receiving information via the project
newsletter, the website and the email announcement.

Overall, respondents felt that the open houses were very useful, well organized and well worth
attending. They also responded that the study team was very helpful.

Limited-English Speaking Open Houses Summary

At the meetings for the limited-English speaking community, 100 percent evaluation participants
agreed with the results. The locally preferred alternative that was selected by the study team
was supported by 92 percent of the attendees who commented.

The majority of the open house attendees were residents. Open house participants were
primarily made aware of the open houses through community organizations.

Overall, respondents felt that the limited-English speaking open houses were very useful, very
organized and well-worth attending. They also responded that the study team was very helpful.

Public Engagement Process

The purpose of engaging the community in the study was to ensure that the public and all
interested agencies: actively participated in the Northside-Southside Transit Improvements
Study process; were fully aware of the decision-making process for determining which transit
improvements should be implemented; and to educate and initiate support on general concepts,

Draft Northside-Southside September 2007 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

2
such as “street-running light rail transit” (LRT). This section documents the different approaches
and tools used to encourage open house attendance.

A major component of the outreach strategy included the study team making presentations to
announce the open houses and give updates on the progress of the study. Presentations were
made to neighborhood associations, local business groups, community leaders and government
and elected officials. A variety of approaches were employed to encourage residents and
stakeholders to participate in the study, these included:

• More than 20 outreach presentations were held in the spring and summer.
Approximately 270 people attended from the neighborhood, ward and business
associations.
• More than 100 presentations have been made to date.
• Meeting announcements were added to the study’s web site.
• Meeting announcements were placed in the St. Louis American, the St. Louis Argus,
Red Latina, Arch City Chronicle (online), St. Louis Chinese American and Suburban
Journals.
• Approximately 600 posters were placed on Metro buses and MetroLink trains.
• More than 25 posters were displayed at neighborhood association offices and at local
businesses in the study area.
• Meeting announcements were sent via email to over 700 interested individuals.
• A study newsletter, which highlighted the open houses among other topics, was mailed
to more than 1,650 people.
• 800 meeting flyers were translated into Somalian, Bosnian, Spanish and Vietnamese to
announce the two limited-English speaking meetings. The meeting held at the
International Institute included African, Bosnian and Vietnamese populations. The other
was held at St. Cecilia’s Church for the Hispanic population.

General Public Open Houses

Three general public open houses were held from September 18-20, 2007. The Northside open
house took place on Tuesday, September 18, 2007, from 5:00 p.m.-7:30 p.m. at the Fifth
Missionary Baptist Church. The Southside open house took place on Wednesday, September
19, 2007, from 5:00 p.m.-7:30 p.m. at Meramec Elementary School. The downtown open house
took place on Thursday, September 20, 2007, from 3:30 p.m.-6:00 p.m. at the Regional
Collaboration Center. All three open houses contained the same content, and the same
PowerPoint presentation was shown at each one.

In total, 124 people attended the general public open houses. Upon arrival, meeting
participants were asked to indicate on a study area map their residence and place of
employment. The participants identified more than 65 residences and 50 employment locations
within the study area. Approximately 37 people attended the Northside open house followed by
47 people at the Southside open house and 40 at the Downtown open house.

At each open house there were five information stations focusing on the following topics: 1)
Northside-Southside Study Overview; 2) Alternatives 3) Station Land Use and Street Design: 4)
Detailed Evaluation Results; and, 5) Public Involvement and Next Steps. Study team members
were available at each station to talk with participants and to answer questions.

A comment form was distributed to meeting participants as they entered the open house
meetings. Attendees were asked to complete the comment form on-site after they visited all the
stations. Fifty-three meeting participants completed comment forms on-site. Meeting

Draft Northside-Southside September 2007 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

3
participants were asked to comment on the evaluation results for the detailed alternatives and
the recommended locally preferred alternative, as well as public involvement.

Comments

The information provided below follows the order of the comment form. A copy of the comment
form is attached as Appendix A. Of the 124 people who attended the open houses 53 (43%)
completed comment forms. Please note that there are not an equal number of responses for
each question because some attendees did not complete all questions.

Evaluation Results

At station #4, participants viewed the Detailed Alternatives for the study area. They were asked
to share their thoughts about the evaluation results. A complete list of the verbatim comments
regarding the evaluation results is attached as Appendix B.

Evaluation Total # of Agree with Disagree with

Results Comments Results Results

Overall 17 11 6

Northside 4 3 1

Downtown 1 1 0

Southside 8 4 4

Locally Preferred Alternative

The participants could review the recommended locally preferred alternative at station #4. The
locally preferred alternative includes the Natural Bridge / 14th Street alignment on the north, the
9th / 10th Street Couplet in downtown, and the Jefferson / Interstate-55 alignment on the south.
Participants were asked to share their thoughts about the proposed transit expansion route for
the City of St. Louis. A complete list of the verbatim comments regarding the locally preferred
alternative is attached as Appendix C.

Locally Total # of Support Do Not Comments on

Preferred Comments Alternative Support Other Issues
Alternative Alternative

Overall 42 25 12 5

Northside 6 6 0 -----

Downtown 2 0 2 -----

Southside 10 8 2 -----

Draft Northside-Southside September 2007 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

4
Public Involvement

In order to develop a profile of the general open house attendees, the last portion of the
comment form collected information about the attendee and provided an evaluation of the key
aspects of the workshops. Attendees were asked to describe their affiliation to the study area;
how they heard about the workshops; and, to rate the success of the workshops. Overall, the
majority of the meeting participants were residents. More than half of the meeting participants
indicated they received a newsletter, viewed the study website or received an email about the
open houses. A little more than a tenth of the meeting participants were advised of the
meetings through a community organization. More than 75 percent of the respondents felt the
information presented at the open house was “very useful,” while another 22 percent considered
it “useful.” Almost three-fourths of the respondents (72%) rated the study team as being “very
helpful.” More than 70 percent of the respondents felt the Open House was well organized and
well worth attending. Below are the results. Appendix D outlines respondents’ additional
comments.

Stakeholder Type:
55% Resident 10% Business Owner
19% Frequent Traveler 3% Adjacent Property Owner
12% Other 1% Elected Official

How they heard about the open house:

21% Newsletter 4% Public Official
20% Web site 4% Other (bus posters,
TV/radio)
17% E-mail 4% Neighbor
12% Community Organization 1% Newspaper Ad
11% Flyer 0% Co-worker
6% Friend 0% Relative

The information provided was:

78% Very Useful 22% Useful 0% Not Very Useful

The study team was:

72% Very Helpful 28% Helpful 0% Not Helpful

In general, the open house was:

71% Well Organized 28% Organized 0% Not Well Organized

73% Well Worth 27% Worth 0% Not Worth Attending

Attending Attending

Attendee Profile

As indicated in Exhibit 1, the general open house attendees represented people who live, work,
and own property and are frequent transit riders. More than half of the attendees (55%) reside in
the study area. Nineteen percent of the attendees are frequent travelers and ten percent are
business owners, while another 12 percent of the respondents selected the “other” option. The
respondents for “others” included a commuter, neighborhood leader, Washington University
employee, neighborhood association director, transit activist, interested citizen, trail walker and
an office worker.

Draft Northside-Southside September 2007 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

5
 Exhibit 1
Which of the following best describes you?

Other
12%

Frequent Traveler
19%

Resident
55%
Elected Official
1%
Adjacent Property Owner
3%
Business Owner
10%

Open House Notification

In an effort to further gauge the success of outreach efforts, a question under public
involvement asked attendees how they found out about the open houses (Exhibit 2). Outreach
efforts included newsletters, email, the study website, community organizations and notification
flyers. Participants choosing “other”, learned about the meetings on an internet blog, saw the
posters on a Metro Bus or MetroLink train, received a neighborhood newsletter containing the
information, or saw the meeting posted on another website.

Exhibit 2
How did you find out about this open house?
Relative
0% Other
Co-worker
4%
0%
Neighbor
Friend 4% Newsletter
6% 21%
Public Official
4%

Community Organization
12%

Flyer
11%
Newspaper Ad
1%

E-mail
17% Web Site
20%

Open House Information

A lot of information was covered during the two and half hour open houses. The same content
was presented at each meeting with a focus on the evaluation and the decision making process
to select a locally preferred alternative. More than 70 percent of attendees indicated the
information provided was “very useful”. No one felt the information was “not useful” (Exhibit 3).

Draft Northside-Southside September 2007 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

6
 Exhibit 3
The information provided at the open house was:
Not Very Useful
0%

Useful
28%

Very Useful
72%

Study Team

Members of the study team were available at each meeting to answer questions before and
after the presentation. Attendees rated them on their “helpfulness” during the open house.
More than 70 percent of attendees indicated the study team was “very helpful” (Exhibit 4), and
one attendee complimented team members by name.

Exhibit 4
At the open house the study team was:
Not Helpful
0%

Helpful
28%

Very Helpful
72%

Open House

The last two questions on the comment form asked attendees to rate the open houses. The
results (illustrated in Exhibit 5) indicate that attendees felt the format for the open house was
well organized and well worth attending.

Draft Northside-Southside September 2007 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

7
 Exhibit 5
In general, the open house was:
40
Well Organized

35
Well Organized

30

25

20

15
Organized
Organized

10

5
Not Well Organized
Not Well Organized
0
Not Well Organized Organized Well Organized

Additional Comments

The final section of the open house comment form allowed attendees to make additional
comments. Twenty additional comments were made and covered areas such as station design,
the downtown alignment, the presentation and marketing of the meetings. An overview of the
comments is below in Exhibit 6. The verbatim additional comments can be found in Appendix D.

Exhibit 6
Additional Comments

Additional Comments Number of

Responses
Station Design 2
Downtown Alignment 2
Presentation 2
Marketing 3

Limited-English Speaking Open Houses

Following the general public open houses, study team members met with limited-English
speaking residents, particularly representatives from the Latino, Bosnian, African and
Vietnamese communities. The number of limited-English speaking residents is growing in the
City of St. Louis, particularly in south city , and especially among the Latino and Bosnian
populations. Many residents in this community have expressed that they do not have access to
personal vehicles and therefore depend on the area transit system

Draft Northside-Southside September 2007 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

8
Two meetings were held for limited-English speaking communities, The first meeting was
Saturday, October 27, 2007 at the International Institute. The Institute provides a variety of
services for newly arrived immigrants and New Americans. At this location, the presentations
were conducted simultaneously for Bosnian, African and Vietnamese immigrants. The meeting
for Spanish speaking residents was held on Sunday, October 28, 2007 at St. Cecilia’s Catholic
Church. St. Cecilia’s is the official parish recognized for Latino Catholics by the St. Louis
Archdiocese. A translator was present to interpret the speaker’s presentation. Translators for
each language assisted presenters with interpretation of information as well as completion of
language specific comment forms. In total, 27 people attended the two meetings.

Public Involvement

The public involvement questions asked the limited-English speaking participants to describe
themselves and how they learned about the meetings. Participants were also asked to rate the
meetings according to the information provided. Below are the results. Appendix E outlines
additional verbatim comments from respondents.

Stakeholder type:
50% Resident 12% Business Owner
7% Nearby Property Owner 7% Elected Official
19% Frequent Traveler 5% Other

How did you hear about the meeting?:

38% Community Organization 0% Neighbor
60% Other 0% Public Official
2% Flyer 0% Co-worker
0% Newsletter 0% Email
0% Newspaper ad 0% Website
0% Friend

The information provided was:

100% Very Useful 0% Useful 0% Not Very Useful

In general, the meeting was:

92% Well Worth 0% Worth Attending 0% Not Worth Attending
Attending

Draft Northside-Southside September 2007 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

9
Appendix A: Comment Form Document

Draft Northside-Southside September 2007 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

10
Draft Northside-Southside September 2007 Open Houses Comment Summary Report
11
Appendix B: Verbatim Written Comments on Question 1, Evaluation
Results
Form
# Comment
If you can make it work I can support the plan but I want to better understand the
101 opportunity for the communities.
Natural Bridge / 14th Street is the best route. The right-of-way is already wide enough
on most of the route (or possibly all of the route. - I am not sure how wide 14th street
102 is.)
I agree that the best alternative includes the Natural Bridge / 14th alternative on the
northside the 9th & 10th Couplet downtown and the Jefferson / I-55 alternatives on the
103 southside.
105 Very well presented. Fair, easy to interpret.
I am in full support of alternatives for the north side. I would like to see some
Florissant Avenue included, however I believe Metro would a needed connection to
107 Natural Bridge.
Jefferson loop would allow for much more development and positive neighborhood
201 impact.
The plan for Jefferson will obviously help development. It is the logical, most cost
202 effective option.
203 I felt that viable pros and cons were pointed out for each alternative.
204 Prefer the Chouteau-UPRR route.
If the Chouteau-UPRR line is built, I promise to sell my car (grin). UPRR has an
interesting definition of "sharing" their right-of-way. Seems more like creating a new
205 right-of-way to me.
210 The stops on the lines are logical for present day economy and population.
I think it would help for the public to have access to info. In all of the constraints,
211 including funding, FTA evaluation factors, shared railroad right-of-way regulations, etc.
I would be very pleased to see the MetroLink installed down Jefferson Ave. I think it
212 would be beneficial to many businesses.
For the southside, the Jefferson Ave. alternative is very impressive, full of development
opportunities, close proximity to improving neighborhoods, and cost effective
214 compared with the other proposed route.
215 Well thought out.
This transportation project embraces the transit history of St. Louis and would enable
both the productive reuse of our existing historic buildings and our vacant lots and
opportunity areas. I think the study team has hit the nail on the head with regard to
their choice of alignments. Street-running LRT down Jefferson and Natural Bridge with
downtown couplet will spur economic development and improve the mobility and
217 quality of the life for its users.
I have no strong opinion between the two southside routes. Clearly there are pros and
218 cons to each.
221 Looks good. Like the street-level train. Don't let the car-first crazies shout it down.
Due to the low platform equipment and street running alignments this will be very good
223 for St. Louis City, but a tough sell to the county tax payers.

Draft Northside-Southside September 2007 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

12
 Not getting a real secure / safe feeling about the evaluation of this study, seems not
enough interest is being placed on south county / I-55 area. I feel if you build it, it will
get used more and more. Plus you (we) wouldn't have a time limit / access to busses in
225 getting arsenal.
I think these plans are on the right track. This is a timely study, which is needed in this
area. I think this will allow more mobility to citizens who don’t drive. With the increased
price for gasoline, these extensions will save people money on transportation needs.
The ridership has increased; all the more reason to expand the system. The
extensions that are located near parking garages may help the motorist save money
301 on commuting daily.
I don't like street level stations for safety and traffic concerns. I realize it costs more to
build underground stations like Skinker, but it is safer and avoids traffic congestion.
This is designed to be a trolley or streetcar line, not a light rail system which has its
own right-of-way & doesn't compete with cars. Houston has had numerous car
accidents involving trains. Why don't you present various options & let the public
302 decide if they want to pay more in time & money for safety?
303 Sounds well thought out.
Thank you for making the open house available on more than one date at more than
304 one time.
306 We need a Botanical Garden and Hill connection!
307 Too many statistics for me.
308 The evaluation boards do show the pros & cons of each alternative.
On the southside option that uses the rail right-of-way, I have serious concerns about it
not connecting with the existing Grand MetroLink stop. I would prefer that it connect at
this point and terminate than not connect at all. As someone who had lived in South St.
Louis for many years I know that I would resort to driving my car rather than travel all
the way downtown just to transfer to head back west on the current MetroLink System.
I agree that Chouteau needs to be served. Terminating a Grand would still serve
312 Grand/Chouteau. I would prefer a streetcar or RBT for the length of Chouteau.
315 It looks good.
I believe that north area would do as well traveling west Florissant From I-70 north &
317 west.
318 Logical, practical, well presented.
320 Have the shelters cover the entire platform or station! Just like in England!

Draft Northside-Southside September 2007 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

13
Appendix C: Verbatim Written Comments on Question 2,
Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative

Form # Comment
101 What about the opportunities for each of the communities? That needs to be clear-cut.
The north side route is what I am familiar with and the evaluation matrix supports the Natural
102 Bridge / 14th Street route.
103 Interesting
104 To me the new proposed extension appears to go nearly the same route as the current line.
The proposed route is similar to the current MetroLink route. I look forward to the expansion
105 following this one for a more diverse alternative for north city residents.
107 Outstanding. I'm in full support of the Natural Bridge / 14th street.
I think any and all expansion is fantastic. It is needed and wanted. I just wish the process
201 could somehow be sped up.
I prefer each of these alternatives. In particular I am happy to see the Jefferson choice for the
203 southside. I believe that area has the greatest need and opportunity for development.
Selection of southside route based on lowest cost does not seem to be in the best interest of
204 the citizens of St. Louis City and County.
I am in favor of the Jefferson / I-55. It would be another great asset to the area. The strong
business area and BOTH sides of Cherokee would profit. This area has made a change for
the better in the last 5 years. I only see things improving form here on out. - Pam Lanning,
206 3400 Indiana (50 years old, 30 year resident, grew up in Crestwood, MO)
207 Seems like the best choice.
It appears that there is no direct interface between the southside link and the downtown
street-running system with the existing MetroLink at the Civic Center (Scott Trade) station.
This is a huge mistake. The failure to combine these 2 elements at one station severely
reduces connectivity. It appears you are creating 2 systems - a street running system and an
off street system. I think the downtown couplet is unnecessary given its proximity to the
existing line. I think makes more sense to scrap the downtown couplet. I would use that
money to put the Chouteau part of the south route or Jefferson route on piers. It will greatly
speed run times. It makes no sense to spend millions on a system extension that will deliver
run times that are slower than automobile travel. It's a mistake. - John Openlander, 4242
208 Laclede Ave, #106, St. Louis, MO 63108, 314-646-3640, [email protected]
209 Perfect
If signage doesn't exist to indicate the time of the next train in a countdown fashion, the
210 appeal is less to riders coming from cars.
Glad to see safety discussion added. I would like to see actual data on fatality rates for street
211 running vs. separated running, which would influence final choice of route.
212 I am in favor of the plan and hope all the plans work out for the Jefferson Avenue expansion.
Jefferson / I-55 alignment is a terrific choice. Residential areas from Lafayette Square / Gate
District down to Marine Villa and Dutchtown are growing steadily. Many of the existing
residents either grew up with trolley cars or parents who still used public transportation or
buses. Many new residents are from other Metro areas and are families and accustomed to
good public transportation. As well other new residents see the benefits of city living and
213 "neighborhoods." Good public transportation builds & stabilizes neighborhoods.
Seems the obvious and most effective option. This will make a visible difference and lend an
elegant urban feel to the southside. Shared access with freight rail will not have the same
214 impact and promote upscale feel to the city.

Draft Northside-Southside September 2007 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

14
215 Have a park & ride at Broadway & 55.
216 Jefferson / I-55 route looks okay.
These routes comprise the best options for continuing the city of St. Louis urban rebirth. In
order to achieve a true renaissance, this city needs an urban transit system. These preferred
alignments achieve the goals of fostering this environment. Please do what is in the study
group's power to voice your support of the alternatives and to encourage the realization of
217 this essential project. Thank you.
I think it would be great if you can somehow get the Loughborough station on the west side of
218 the highway.
Natural Bridge seems to be a "natural" route. Jefferson is the most attractive with the
development possibilities. I don't like how Chouteau seems to duplicate the existing
alignment. Maybe a streetcar would be better. Concerned about how the southside will mesh
220 with MetroSouth due to different routes.
Natural Bridge seems to make the most sense on north. On south, Jefferson makes the most
sense to me, especially from an economic development perspective. There's just a lot more
potential there than along a UP track that winds through residential neighborhoods. Also, I
221 like all the stops on Jefferson. More stops = more riders & more impact.
As a life long resident of the St. Louis area & a current resident of the city of St. Louis, I find it
difficult to endorse a project involving multiple millions of dollars that basically moves
minorities and low-income citizens from point A to point B. If I'm correct, this area is already
serviced by Metro bus lines. With the 64-40 project underway, and the traffic tie-ups already
causing problems, Metro would seem to serve a larger more "needing" segment of the
population if it looked at expansion through the central corridor, and as an alternative to the
222 inner belt.
Very logical selections for T.O.D. However, these alignments require a commitment by the
223 city to big T.I.F. dollars.
My main concern is the reduced development potential assigned with using the I-55 right-of-
224 way. I would prefer a route that is at street level and more integrated into the neighborhoods.
Top priority for Jefferson / I-55. I would prefer all tracks to be like the current runs and not in
the local streets but if that is our only option. I feel daily ridership should include recreational
and sporting events too - it would be greatly used. Couldn't the state highway and federal
225 fund this with money they would save on the wear and tear of current work?
I think since Grand and Gravois proposals may interfere with traffic at the complex
intersections, the proposed projects on Chouteau/ UPRR and Jefferson Ave / I-55 may be the
best routes. Judging by the input already received at Station #4, of your presentation, these
routes may not have as much neighborhood resistance concerning people's houses and
businesses. Folks don't really accept programs that may endanger their properties. Looking
at the photos, I believe these projects will be a welcome addition to St. Louis communities by
301 adding beauty and a pleasant, clean appearance to these areas.
Any lines into the CBD should be underground for traffic & safety reasons. I know that is more
expensive but it is important to do it right the first time. I'd rather it cost more & take longer but
302 develop a first rate transit system that eliminates safety & transit concerns.
303 Sounds well thought out with good potential to improve the neighborhoods involved!
304 All three sound good.
306 We need less lines on Highway 55 and more stops in residential city neighborhoods.
All seems to fit very well for the future. My only thought is if there is any fire or police
emergency in "inner" downtown, the trains from either north (coming south) or vice versa are
going to be trapped. I suggest that a single track (with possible one block stretch of double
track around Locust) be installed so that service could still be maintained. Hopefully also "in
307 some future" after this "line" is opened, a heritage trolley line could be run on a portion from

Draft Northside-Southside September 2007 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

15
 14th & Chouteau north to Natural Bridge.

The preferred alternatives appear to be the best of the alternatives available. The northside
alignment is basically the same as the one proposed in the 2000 MTIA, except for its ending
308 location. The 50 foot separation on UP alignment forces the Jefferson Alignment to the top.
The downtown deviation seems unnecessary, given the compact size of downtown.
311 Otherwise, the basic scheme seems fine.
On the preferred option for the southside, it would be great if it served Soulard. Is there a
possibility of it turning East at some point to enter Soulard? I would like to see both southside
lines built with the elimination of the stretch of Chouteau on the Chouteau UPRR line. I have
no opinion of the northside route, as I am unfamiliar with the area, but it would be preferred to
see lines built there as well. (An East & West line). I think they should all be planned at this
stage even if it takes 20 years to build them. It will inform the decisions of the next line to be
312 built.
315 The sooner the better.
They seem to make sense, although it would be nice if the downtown couplet/ loop could
316 extend a bit further west into downtown.
317 Acceptable.
Good routes. I like the Grand route on south side, but Jefferson is next best. Busses sure
would save a lot of money compared to those street level trains. I did not like how in
319 downtown there is no east to west loop. New track runs with the old north to south.
320 Use doors #1 & #6 on the SD 400s and SD 460s. Have brick laid in the track area on streets.

Draft Northside-Southside September 2007 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

16
Appendix D: General Open House Verbatim Written Additional
Comments

• I would like to see information on LRT for North County as well as north & south economic
opportunity for all communities.
• I did not comment on downtown and southside because I am not as familiar with those
areas.
• There are rail tracks just north of this area. Why can't the system tie into those tracks? The
tracks are just north of Lee Avenue.
• I would like to see a more extensive online presence for discussion of these topics.
• I am very excited. Jefferson / I-55 is absolutely the right decision for the southside.
• LRT station example #1 looks functional and urban. Streetscaping example #1 shows an
uninviting covered waiting area. Streetscaping example #3 is appealing and similar to
Kingshighway at BJC. Transit shelter example is unique and artistic, yet open and inviting.
• Some neighborhoods have very strong feelings about one route vs. another. The process for
determining the final route needs at least the same level of public involvement and more
transparency.
• For first 6 months of operation, have discounted monthly pass. Use advertising space on
trains to target people who work and have money to spend. Provide at least one advertising
space for non-profits. For first 3-6 months, provide extra security and signage of proper
activities while riding public transportation. If trouble makers find early in the game that they
will not be tolerated it will curb problems for years to come.
• Great Job! I am thrilled by the prospect.
• I would like to see the S. Jefferson route & the downtown parallel route.
• Q & A session for presentation went a bit long.
• I emailed this (open house) information on to 25+ people. The city of St. Louis is at a critical
juncture. Rehabs, initially mostly residential, are taking place along and around the Jefferson
line as proposed / suggested, the city is gaining population for the first time in 160 years, and
the perception of the city from both those living in the city and county (and other areas) is
beginning to turn the tide. Transit improvements and the resulting impacts positively affect
mobility, the quality and character of the built environment, the social welfare of the city's
residents and its visitors and foster economic development through TOD and increased
mobility. The Jefferson, 9th / 10th couplet and the Natural Bridge routes will encourage TOD
and are well suited for connectivity and neighborhood and citizen mobility.
• If I had not gotten on the mailing list at an earlier meeting, I would have missed this. Poorly
advertised! I don't feel this meeting was well advertised. I can't believe there weren't a lot
more people present. I only found out about the meeting because I attended an earlier
meeting and got on your mailing list. Do both southside routes! (Of course I realize the
money is a huge issue.)
• Better marketing of community meetings.
• This addition to the MetroLink system appears to be a stand alone type. Thus, St. Louis City
will have its own line for North-South transit. I can see that costs are going to require this
hybrid system.
• I said 3C #2 "worth attending" instead of "well worth attending" because I was disappointed
that it will probably be a long time before it comes out to South County or Jefferson County.
Highway 55 is getting so heavily traveled it is a hassle traveling to & from work - also
recreation time. Please consider helping us out in the south. Use of a microphone for your
speakers would have helped us hear them also not hearing people/workers talking in the
background making hearing at a max. Thanks to Russ and Ken for the info. Also, Amanda
gave good explanations while I was first walking around.

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

17
• I was surprised that there were no comments (nor were there any announcements) in the
daily St. Louis Post Dispatch.
• Once again I'd like to see a comprehensive plan before even one more line is built. This plan
should include possible streetcar and bus lines as well. So far the approach of planning one
line at time feels too piece meal. Can this study also recommend a comprehensive 20 year
plan for St. Louis?
• I just hope all these plans are put into effect!
• My main frustration is how long it seems to take to get any sort of transit built - years of
studies, environmental impacts, political wrangling, and finally construction time. People in
St. Louis love MetroLink. It should be obviously expand with a north/south line. What can we
do to make this happen faster? Good transit is integral in making cities livable!
• I disagree with developing a separate track system/ separate train fleet.

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

18
Appendix E: Limited-English Speaking Open House Verbatim Written
Additional Comments
Form # Comment
402 It's a great idea to include opinions from the general public. But, it is so
difficult to agree with everyone and satisfy all the people.

413 Good Choice

415 Great Team
416 Great Team

Draft Northside-Southside June 2006 Open Houses Comment Summary Report

19