SIB Change Management Process Guide Updated
SIB Change Management Process Guide Updated
Summary
The purpose of this document is to draw the procedures that control the Change
Management processes of Saba Islamic Bank Information Technology. This
document describes how to use the procedures and provides a definition of the
management controls required and some of reasons for deploy those controls.
SIB
Table of Contents
Summary 2
Table of Contents ..............................................................................................................................................3
Objectives/Purpose .........................................................................................................................................5
Scope Inclusion..................................................................................................................................................6
Scope Exclusion ................................................................................................................................................6
Objectives/Purpose
Change Management is the process of planning, coordinating, implementing and
monitoring changes affecting any production platform or application software within
Information Technology’s control. The objectives of the Change Management
process are to:
o Ensure that changes are made with minimum disruption to the services IT
has committed to its users.
o Support the efficient and prompt handling of all changes.
o Provide accurate and timely information about all changes.
o Ensure all changes are consistent with business and technical plans
and strategies.
o Ensure that a consistent approach is used.
o Provide additional functionality and performance enhancements to
systems while maintaining an acceptable level of user services.
o Reduce the ratio of changes that need to be backed out of the system
due to inadequate preparation.
o Ensure that the required level of technical and management
accountability is maintained for every change.
o Monitoring number, reason, type, and associated risk of the changes.
o Provide documentation that allows SIB IT management to understand, at
any point in time, the configuration of the IT environment.
Scope Inclusion
Scope Exclusion
-------
Status of Changes
The following status codes are used to reflect the status of a change request:
Opened – The change has been received and accepted but has not been
assigned
Approved – The business and technical assessments have been completed
and the change has been approved and committed to the change scheduler.
In-Progress – The change has been received, acknowledged and assigned.
Work is in progress to fulfill the change request.
Rejected – The change has been rejected and will be routed back to the
requester with an explanation and a recommended course of action.
Closed – The change request has been closed.
Canceled – The change request has been canceled.
Types of Changes
The Change Management Procedure applies to all types of changes related to the SIB
IT environment. The following is a description of each of the types of changes that can
take place and the rules that apply to each.
Application Changes (Core banking system , applications software, SWIFT,
Saba Online…etc)–
Changes to any application that is running on or linked to by any hardware or
software in the SIB IT environment . These changes are typically made to
enhance the functionalities or performance of or to fix known errors in the IT
application environment. These changes cannot be implemented without
approval of the concerned managers. Level of Risk should be assigned and the
actions to be followed. Changes should be approved by the concerned IT
Department Manager. Critical changes should be raised by the concerned IT
department manager and to be approved by the Head of IT Division.
All changes are controlled by the Change Management Procedure. The
concerned IT department manager is responsible and accountable of the
impacts of the changes made.
Hardware Changes All SIB IT support equipment installations, discontinuances
and relocations are controlled by the Change Management Procedure. Level of
Risk should be assigned and the actions to be followed. Those activities can be
requested by anyone but must have the approval of the Head of IT Division
(and/or) IT Infrastructure Manager.
Software Changes - The criteria for entering a software change into the
Change process are based upon the effect that the changes may have on the IT
support resources. If the changes affect the system, users or the support staff
there is a requirement to enter it into the Change Management Procedure. If the
change is made for the exclusive benefit of the requester and if failure could not
affect anyone else, that change would be exempt from the Change Process, but
should be approved by the concerned IT department manager. For example, a
change made by a programmer affecting a procedure or a program under
development on a test application requires no entry. However, when stand-
alone test time is required on a production system, a change request a form and
Change Management Procedure are required.
Change Levels
The following guidelines for definition of Change risk levels are provided for consideration
during the planning cycle. It must be clearly understood that these requirements are the
minimum for each of the defined levels. The Requester may wish to plan additional lead
times, documentation or reviews to ensure that targets can be met and planned
implementation schedules can be achieved.
All changes are tracked, correlated and used for management reporting, statistic
SIB, trending, etc., to identify when and where additional resources should be
provided. For any change that fails, the Change Requester must enter an
explanation in the comments section of the Change Record for that change and
notify the Change Coordinator. The Change Coordinator will then close the change
with the appropriate close status. If the change is to be attempted with an extra time,
the Change Requester should reenter the change with the new date.
Level E Changes
Emergency changes are those changes that are vital in order to ensure that IT’s
committed service levels are maintained. An Emergency change should not be used
in order to bypass the appropriate lead-time for a change that has been entered into
the system.
Exception changes are those changes that are a result of SIB business need and
must be installed prior to the required lead-time.
These types of changes proceed to the implementation phase when the requester's
manager acknowledge that an Emergency or an Exception situation exists. The
request will be forwarded to the concerned manager of the IT department, and who
should study and analyze the request. If he also acknowledges that an Emergency or
an Exception situation exists, as well as, the requested change is not critical or just of
adding new features or fixing bugs, then the concerned IT manager should take
decision of that change. If the change is critical and affecting the core
hardware/software/services or with a wide effect on business, services, or users, the
concerned IT manager should immediately raise the request to the Head of IT division
with the suggested solution or action that will be implemented, then the Head of the IT
should approve and confirm the request and confirm or amend the suggested
solution, or postponement/eliminate the requested change.
These changes will be post-reviewed to assure successful implementation, along with
identification of any external impacts or new requirements. Post-review will also
evaluate the reason for the Level E change request and try to determine a way of
eliminating this requirement in the future. The post-review will also evaluate if, in fact,
the change addressed a real or a perceived emergency condition. In all cases, the
review must determine if additional action is required, what that action should be and
who will be responsible for the action.
Documentation requirements for Emergency changes are the same as any
change. The Requester is responsible for meeting all requirements for the
change documentation within one week of the implementation.
Approval of the request by one or more of the following individuals may be required:
• General Manager
• Assistant General Manger
• Head of Branches and International division, Head of IT division, or
Head of Investment division.
• Head and/or Manager of the user department requesting the change
• Change Review Board
Depending on the scope and impact of the proposed change the processes below
will be followed:-
1- The concerned manager/managers of the IT department should receive, study
and analyze the request. If he also acknowledges that an Emergency or an
Exception situation exists.
2- If the requested change is not critical or just of adding new features/reports or
fixing bugs, then the concerned IT manager should take decision of that
request of change.
3- If the change is critical and affecting the core hardware/software/services or
with a wide effect on business, services, or users, the concerned IT manager
should immediately raise the request to the Head of IT division with the
suggested solution or action that will be implemented, then the Head of the IT
should approve and confirm the request and also confirm or amend the
suggested solution, or postponement/eliminate the requested change.
Level 4 Changes
A Level 4 Change would have a major impact on IT services if a problem occurs
during install. The install time is lengthy and the back out is very difficult or
impossible.
Level 4 Change Requests are to be entered into the Change Management Data Base
at least thirty (30) business days prior to the planned implementation date.
The Requester or representative for a Level 4 change is required to attend the Change
Communication meeting immediately prior to implementation so that any questions
or concerns may be addressed.
Whenever a Level 4 change must be expedited to address a critical timing situation, a
special meeting must be held and headed by the Head of IT Division. To expedite a
Level 4 change, all parties that may be affected by this change must present or be
represented at the special meeting. It is the responsibility of the concerned IT
manager (Development, Infrastructure or automated services) responsible
mainly about the change to arrange the meeting and assure attendance by the
required groups or individuals. If the required groups or individuals cannot be
assembled, the change cannot be expedited and an escalation will be required.
Depending on the scope and impact of the proposed change the processes below
will be followed:-
1- The concerned manager/managers of the IT department should receive, study
and analyze the request. If he also acknowledges that an Emergency or an
Exception situation exists.
2- If the requested change is not critical or just of adding new features/reports or
fixing bugs, then the concerned IT manager should take decision of that
request of change.
3- If the change is critical and affecting the core hardware/software/services or
with a wide effect on business, services, or users, the concerned IT manager
should immediately raise the request to the Head of IT division with the
suggested solution or action that will be implemented, then the Head of the IT
should approve and confirm the request and also confirm or amend the
suggested solution, or postponement/eliminate the requested change.
Level 3 Changes
A Level 3 Change may impact a large number of end users. It is a high-risk change that
requires a significant effort to backout.
The requester or representative for a Level 3 change is required to attend the Change
Communication Meeting immediately prior to implementation so that any questions or
concerns may be addressed.
Would failure of the job being changed stop the flow of jobs for non-
critical files or applications?
Approval of the request by one or more of the following individuals may be required:
• General Manager
• Assistant General Manger
• Head of Branches and International division, Head of IT division, or
Head of Investment division.
• Head and/or Manager of the user department requesting the
change
• Change Review Board
Depending on the scope and impact of the proposed change the processes
below will be followed:-
1- The concerned manager/managers of the IT department should receive,
study and analyze the request. If he also acknowledges that an
Emergency or an Exception situation exists.
2- If the requested change is not critical or just of adding new
features/reports or fixing bugs, then the concerned IT manager should
take decision of that request of change.
3- If the change is critical and affecting the core hardware/software/services
or with a wide effect on business, services, or users, the concerned IT
manager should immediately raise the request to the Head of IT division
with the suggested solution or action that will be implemented, then the
Head of the IT should approve and confirm the request and also confirm
or amend the suggested solution, or postponement/eliminate the
requested change.
Level 2 Changes
A Level 2 Change is not transparent, but is minimal in risk and impact. It is the
responsibility of the Requester to notify any areas of a potential impact. The change is a
Level 2 if it requires an IPL (restarting) of a system (Initial Program Load),
subsystem or the restart of a critical component on a production system. Level 2
Change Requests must be entered into the Change Management database prior to the
Scheduled Change Window being requested.
The Requester or representative for a Level 2 change is required to attend the Change
Communication meeting immediately prior to planned implementation so that
any questions or concerns may be addressed.
Will the change have only minor impact on banking services provided to the
end users if problems occur?
Will the change be visible only to a small group of end users?
Is this a moderate risk change?
Is the change relatively simple to install?
Has the change been implemented successfully a number of times before?
Does it require only a moderate effort to backout the change quickly?
Will it require only an IPL, recycle of major application or reloading of
Network devices to implement or backout?
Level 1 Changes
A Level 1 Change has little or no external visibility, no external dependencies or no
operator intervention. There is no associated risk or impact with the change, either to
the system if the change is incompatible or to the Requester if the change
implementation is delayed. The change does not require an IPL or recycle of an
application to implement or backout.
Level 1 changes are entered into the Change data base and will be communicated
daily to any affected areas where impact or interest can be identified outside of the
Requester's own area.
Will the change have only minimal or no impact on services provided to the end
users if a problem occurs?
Is the change familiar or common to those who will implement it?
Is the change reliable and low risk?
Risk/Complexity Scoring
The following matrix is designed to assist the Change Sponsor, Change Implementer,
Change Requester and the Change Review Board in determining the appropriate
assignment of the change category. This is only a guideline, as changes may be
categorized at a different level based on management judgment of the
risk/complexity involved.
Factor: Points
Organizational Visibility of Change or Financial Exposure:
Visible to Executive Vice President level, high financial exposure or 1
negative external publicity
Visible to Senior Vice President level or medium financial exposure 2
Visible to First Vice President level or low financial exposure 3
Routine IT Activity or minimal financial exposure 4
Impact to other Systems or Applications:
4 or more systems or applications related to change 1
None 4
Back Out Effort:
Back out difficult, impossible or undesirable 1
Minimal 4
Business Process Change:
Considerable and complex change required by IT and/or the customers 1
2
Moderate change required by IT and/or the customers
3
Little change required
Minimal 4
Scope of Change:
Hardware & software & network & services across platforms 1
Factor: Points
Single component 4
Degree of Visibility to IT Customers:
High 1
Medium 2
Low 3
Minimal 4
Change Experience:
New technology, no experience 1
2
New technology, limited experience
3
Existing technology, some experience
Existing technology, considerable experience 4
3 months or less 2
1 month or less 3
1 week or less 4
8 – 14 4(Maximum)
15 – 20 3
21 – 26 2
27 – 32 1(Minimum)
This is done to ensure that all changes are sufficiently communicated to all
potentially impacted parties as well as for future reference. All changes
must have management approval commensurate with their risk
assessment levels (see Change Request Form section).
There is a group called the Change Review Board (CRB) that meets
periodically to review requests for change to the IT environment and
systems, change assessments and implementation of changes (see SIB
Change Review Board section).
All requested changes will be entered into the Change Management
System prior to implementation. This includes Emergency and Exception
Changes.
The requester will assign the appropriate risk assessment category (1, 2,
3, 4, or E), taking into account the impact to the user community in the
event of failure of the change upon implementation (see Change Level
section).
Once the request is submitted, a Technical Assessment will be scheduled.
This is a review of the request by appropriate parties to determine the
technical impact of the change to the environment, applications software,
or automated services. This review will encompass:
Technical Impact/Risk
analysis
Technical Adequacy of
plans
Dependencies and/or conflicts
Ensuring compliance with existing Strategies, Plans and Change
Management Standards
The resulting analysis of this assessment is a key input into the change
approval process.
A Business Assessment is then done to determine the business impact of
installing or not installing the change. The resulting analysis also becomes a
key input into the change approval process.
Once the Technical and Business Assessments are successfully completed,
change approval can be given. This is done at any one of the three Change
o Team meetings which take place weekly (see Meetings section). At this
time, the change team assigns a date and time for change
implementation. As part of the approval process, it is assumed that, as
one of the criteria for approval of the change request, the requester's
manager has ensured that the proper testing procedures have been
followed and that there was a successful test completed (see
Management Approval section).
The change implementation is complete when the requester validates that the
acceptance criteria, defined prior to the change install, have been successfully
met.
Tracking of the change by the change team stops after the change has been
installed and is verified as successful.
1. Enter
Change
Request
2. Assign
Change
Implementer
3. Monitor
Change
Calendar
4. Perform
Assessments
5. Approve
Change
6. Commit
Change
Schedule
7. Deploy
Change
8. Change
Quality
Assurance
9. Document and
Close
Change
The Enter Change Request flow begins when a change request is submitted. In this
activity, all required information about the change and supporting documentation is
entered into the Change Management system. The change request should be submitted
in accordance with the time frame required by the initial impact assessment.
Scope Inclusion
Scope Exclusion
Goal(s)
Start Trigger
Change Request
Stop Trigger
Yes
Assign request
to IT analyst
Conduct Technical
Assessment
Valid No
Close Change
Request?
Yes
The Assign Change Implementer flow begins once a change request has been
documented and selected for the change management process. During this workflow, a
change record is assigned to an appropriate owner (Development, Infrastructure, or
automated services departments), the change record is updated with this assignee
information, and the change is sent to the assignee.
Scope Inclusion
Scope Exclusion
Goal(s)
Start Trigger
Stop Trigger
Update Change
Record w/
Assignee
Send Change to
Assignee
The Monitor Change Calendar flow determines the scheduling for changes to be
deployed. During this workflow, changes are penciled into a calendar, and the schedule
is monitored for changes that are completed or have run out of time in their scheduled
change deployment window. If time has expired for a change then it can be escalated
and rescheduled based on escalation standards.
Scope Inclusion
Scope Exclusion
Changes that are not formally put into the change calendar.
Goal(s)
Monitor the change calendar for changes that have not been completed and
have run out of time for the purpose of change escalation.
Allow for changes to be rescheduled.
Allow for changes to be removed from the change calendar upon completion.
Start Trigger
Stop Trigger
2
Reschedule
No Change
Change Time
Escalate Change
Complete? No Expired?
Yes
Yes
Change Complete?
o Monitor the change calendar for change work that has been completed.
Time Expired?
o Determine whether a change record that is incomplete has run out of time.
Escalate Change
o Reclassify the change to a higher change category level if time has
expired.
Reschedule Change
o Update the calendar with a schedule for the change after it has been
escalated or if the change package is incomplete.
The Perform Assessments flow involves conducting both a business and technical
review of the change package. The assessments determine if the change package is
complete and can therefore continue through the change management process.
Specifically, the perform business assessment flow involves validating the impact of the
proposed change on SIB from a business perspective, evaluating the completeness of
the success criteria and communication plan and reviewing the backup / backout /
recovery plans. The assessment looks at the proposed timing of the change and
ensures that the customer’s management has given the agreement necessary for the
change to be approved and scheduled. Standards, business requirements, and other
assessments required are reviewed and a recommendation is made to approve, reject,
or reschedule the change.
The perform technical assessment flow reviews the completeness of the change plan,
test plan, backup / backout / recovery plans, platform impact assessment, estimated
install time, etc. from a technical perspective. The change success criteria are validated
and the impact of the change to the environment is reviewed to ensure it has been
accurately evaluated. Technical standards are enforced and a decision is made to
approve, reject, or reschedule the change.
Scope Inclusion
Scope Exclusion
Goal(s)
To ensure that all factors have been taken into consideration in terms of the
business aspects of the change.
To ensure that all factors have been taken into consideration in terms of the
technical aspects of the change.
To ensure that everything required to deploy the change and to maintain service
is included in the change request.
Start Trigger
Package No
Return to Assignee
Complete?
Yes
The Approve Change flow is initiated as soon as both the business and technical
assessments have been completed. If the change is approved, it is passed on to the
next sub-process to finalize scheduling. If the change is rejected or determined to be
rescheduled, it may be sent back to the business or technical assessment sub-
processes once the necessary actions are taken. All parties that have been involved to
this point in the process should be notified of the approval, rejection or rescheduling.
Scope Inclusion
All changes that have been forwarded for approval from a business and
technical perspective and whose change categories indicate the requirement for
formal approval.
Scope Exclusion
Changes with change categories that specifically so not require formal approval.
Goal(s)
Start Trigger
Stop Trigger
Final Change
Review
Yes
During this sub-process, a consolidated change schedule is compiled for all approved
changes for a particular period of time. Any conflicts between changes are resolved at
this point and a final schedule is produced. This sub-process is also responsible for
performing the activities needed to communicate the change schedule and gain
agreement from the Change Implementers and Requesters regarding implementation
dates. All affected parties are given final notification.
Scope Inclusion
Scope Exclusion
Emergency changes.
Changes not requiring scheduling (i.e., those changes which have no impact
on business / users – adding printers, adding users)
Assignment of personnel or resources
Goal(s)
To ensure all changes are properly scheduled for a particular period of time.
To ensure those responsible for service delivery are informed about the
final change.
Start Trigger
Stop Trigger
Scheduled change.
Schedule Change
Schedule Change
Commit the change to the change schedule.
The deploy change flow is where the change is actually implemented. Upon the
completion of the implementation, a user acceptance test is conducted to determine
whether or not the change was successfully installed. If the change implementation is
not successful, then it is determined if it can be fixed. If it can be, then it is re-
implemented and acceptance tested.
Scope Inclusion
Scope Exclusion
Goal(s)
Start Trigger
Stop Trigger
Implement Change
Conduct User
Acceptance Test
No Yes
Successful Can be fixed
Fix change
Change? during install?
Yes No
Implement Change
Deploy the change and execute the test plan.
Conduct User Acceptance Test
Perform a user acceptance test to determine whether or not the change was
deployed successfully.
Successful Change?
Can be fixed during install?
Determine whether or not a change can be fixed during install or if it needs to be
rejected and removed.
Fix change
Modify the change record to record any change fixing activity. Perform the fixes
and then re-deploy and re-test.
Reject change and remove from install
Send out notifications to requester that the change has been rejected.
Determine whether or not the change will be rescheduled or restarted.
The Assure Change Quality flow is a post-change workflow that reviews the
change request process. During this workflow, the change management process
can be updated and lessons learned are collected. This information is used to
make continuous improvements on the change management process.
Scope Inclusion
Scope Exclusion
Goal(s)
Start Trigger
Stop Trigger
Conduct Post-
Change Review
Yes
Process Update Change
Changes? Process
No
Yes
Lessons Document Lessons
Learned? Learned
No
The Close Change flow is used to close changes that have been deployed or cancelled
following a post-change review. After a change is closed, the problem management
system is notified of change activity and requesters are notified of change closure.
Scope Inclusion
Scope Exclusion
None
Goal(s)
Start Trigger
Stop Trigger
Update Change
Records
Close Changes
DATE IMPLEMENTED - The date that the change was implemented or tried to be implemented
(DD/MM/YYYY).
TIME IMPLEMENTED - The start time of the implementation (HH:MM).
CHANGE IMPLEMENTED BY - The person who performed the implementation.
CHANGE ACCEPTED BY – The person accepting the change on behalf of the change requester.
DATE CHANGE RECORD CLOSED – The date that the Change Request was closed in the
Change Management system and the person closing the change request.
Unsuccessful Changes
The following guidelines will be used to determine if a change has been
unsuccessful (CU) or caused an outage (CO) to service.
Expected results did not occur.
Change caused an impact to the User or Operations.
Change must be backed out.
Incomplete instructions or inaccurate documentation provided to
Operations.
Change could not be installed in requested time period.
Problem opened as a direct result of the change
Level E Change - problem severity 1,2,3,4
Level 1 Change - problem severity 1,2,3
Level 2 Change - problem severity 1,2,3
Level 3 Change - problem severity 1,2
Level 4 Change - problem severity 1,2
Unsuccessful Changes
For any change that is closed CU (Change Unsuccessful), the Change Requester
must enter into the Change Request the reason(s) why the change was unsuccessful.
The requester must also enter another change request into the system before the
change will be attempted or scheduled again. The level of the new change request will
be the same as the original; however, the new change request will have to cycle
through the complete approval process again.
Canceled Changes
A change that was entered and later canceled will be closed as Change Canceled
(CC). For any change that is closed CC, the Change Requester must enter into the
Change Request the reason(s) why the change was canceled. The Requester must
enter another change in the system before it is attempted again. The level of the new
change request will be the same as the original. The resubmission requirements for
the new change will be negotiated between the Change Coordinator and the Change
Requester.
Postponed Changes
A change that was scheduled but during the installation process could not be safely
promoted (ran out of time, potential scheduling impact found, etc.) will be coded as a
Postponed Change (PC). The change will be automatically rescheduled for the next
Change Window.
Board members :
For SIB the suggested change review board members are:
Branches Manager (Change Coordinator)
IT development Manager
Deputy Financial Manager
Automatic services department Manager
Deputy IT Infrastructure Manager
Change Controller & Secretary
Subject matter experts (call them when needed)
The mission of the Change Review Board is to plan and monitor all changes introduced
into the IT environment. Responsibilities include ensuring the following things are
present for every change:
The Change Request has been submitted with the required information
There is a business reason for the change
A user has been identified who is totally accountable for the change
A viable Change Plan exists
A viable Recovery Plan exists
A viable User Acceptance Plan exists
A Technical Impact Assessment has been done
A Business Impact Assessment has been done
A Communications Plan has been developed ensuring communication to
the IT and user communities of the intended change and the potential
impact to them in case of failure of the implementation.
Appropriate management approval has been obtained based on the
risk assessment category.
A post installation review of the completed change to ensure proper
and successful implementation.
Change Coordinator
The Change Coordinator acts as the user’s primary interface into the change process
and represents their interests and the IT requirement to meet service commitments. The
Change Coordinator’s responsibilities for specific changes include:
Owns, maintains and ensures accuracy and timeliness of the consolidated
change schedule
Ensures that all changes are appropriately planned and communicated
Reviews change requests for procedural compliance, information quality
and completeness
Ensures that accurate priority and impact are assigned to change requests
Coordinates and owns the change approval and rejection process which
incorporates routing to reviewers, receiving reviewer responses and
relaying appropriate information to requesters. This also includes
negotiation with both parties and final ruling
Undertakes post change reviews and owns the sign off mechanism
Schedules and attends all meetings concerning the Change Management
process
Ensures that asset and configuration updates are only permanently applied
as a result of successful and signed-off changes
Participates in project meetings with applications development teams and
the business where the subject is change impact analysis,
implementation and scheduling of large changes
Responsible for owning efficient and quality problem resolution, where
Change Management service expertise is required
Responsible for escalation and exception reporting to the Change Management
Process Owner
Complies with Change Management service standards, process and
procedures as required
Provides input to Change Management service improvement
Provides and is responsible for the accuracy of appropriate Change
Management service input to knowledge bases as a result of changes and
problem resolution
Responsible for contract management and day to day maintenance
management of third party technology suppliers as a result of Change
Management issues with the service
Initiates and is a technical resource to the IMAC service where
Change Management service expertise is required
Captures and reports appropriate Change Management service measurement
data
Attends appropriate problem escalation / resolution, project development and
service support reviews, where Change Management service expertise is
required
Change Requester
The Change Requester initiates and completes the Change Management process and
has overall responsibility for accepting changes. Standards dictate who can act as a
change requester. Change Requester responsibilities for given changes include:
Owns individual changes requested and is ultimately responsible for the
success of the change
Review change request with department manager for approval
Assess the change for risk/impact and ensure the appropriate risk category
has been applied.
Ensure that the change request is complete with accurate information at a
sufficient level of detail to implement the change without intervention.
Ensure Proper lead-time for changes is allowed. (See "Lead Time for
Changes" section in this document).
Conduct User Acceptance testing of change.
Convene the Level 1 Expedite meeting as required.
Communicate intention of change to all potentially affected parties.
Notify the Change Coordinator of any change in date or time of implementation
before the target date is reached. Initiates the Change Control service by
completing and distributing a completed change request
Responsible for obtaining appropriate resource for all change tasks
requiring completion for change success
Co-ordinates task documentation within a change request with other
participating staff as appropriate
Ensures that pre and co-requisites for the change are considered and completed
Ensures completeness of reviewer distribution list as much as possible
Attends change assessment, scheduling and review meetings, as appropriate
Responsible for accurate representation of priority, impact and change window /
time requirements
Ensures all owned rejected changes are placed into a ‘fit state’ for re-submission
Co-ordinates implementation tasks where appropriate and is responsible for
any backout decisions for owned changes in conjunction with Change
Control
Updates owned change requests as required and requested
Responsible for undertaking change tasks within the change
implementation as required
Participates in change task co-ordination meetings as part of change
implementation planning
Change Implementer
The Change Management Implementer has overall responsibility for understanding the
requested change; documenting its implications on both the business and the IT
environments; creating, with other resources as required, the coding, system, procedure
and/or process modifications required to implement the change; with the Change
Requester, representing the change to the Change Review Board; monitoring and/or
testing the change prior to final promotion into production and requesting change
closure by the Review Board. Specific Change Implementer responsibilities include:
The Change Management Process Owner has overall responsibility for ensuring
the quality of the Change Management process. Specific Change Management
Owner responsibilities include:
Change Controller
The Change Controller is responsible for scheduling and overseeing all changes
introduced into the IT production environments and service delivery infrastructure to
ensure that the risk of impacting the availability of services is minimized. Specific
responsibilities include:
Major
IT Infrastructure manager & IT
Server O. System Software – director
Minor
Internet banking , SMS,
System application (Delivery ISO interface, Mobile Change management board with IT
channels APP) Major banking . SWIFT WU. director
Anti viruse, EMAIL
EXCHANGE , Backup
servers, file Change management board with IT
Other application services major server,service Desk director
System & network Administrator Change management board with IT
servers-major DC server, WSUS, director
IT Infrastructure manager & IT
HP products desktop director
Desktop – Major software and hardware
Desktop – Minor
changes on core banking system Change management board with IT
Major) Financial Impact director
IT development manager with IT
Changes on core banking system No financial director
Changes on system that serve back
office Change management board with IT
Financial Impact director
Changes on system that serve back
office IT development manager with IT
No financial director
Changes on second level
systems(HR, payroll, Stores and
asset system …etc) Change management board with IT
Financial Impact director
Changes on second level systems
(HR, payroll, Stores and asset system
…etc) IT development manager with IT
No financial director
Changes on Middleware system Change management board with IT
Interfaced with financial services Financial and customer services director
Changes on internal Middleware IT development manager with IT
system No Financial and customer services director
Change management board with IT
Add new banking system (major) All director
Change management board with IT
Add new back office system director
Add new delivery channels and Change management board with IT
customer services systems director
Add new Middleware system with Change management board with IT
financial and customer interfaces director
Add new Middleware system with no IT development manager with IT
financial and customer interfaces director
Change management board with IT
Urgent systems problems case Financial Impact director
IT development manager with IT
Urgent systems problems case No financial Impact director
Meetings
The major scheduled meetings of the Change Management Process are the Change
Review Board meetings.
These meetings are held when there is a need for a meeting and there are
requests to be discussed and approved. Change Coordinator (Head of Change
Review Board) is responsible for inviting the Change Review Board members for
a meeting before 1 working days in normal cases.
The planned promotion activity is compared to the actual activity and deviations are
noted and discussed. When issues or concerns are identified that have not already
been documented this activity will document them. Process quality issues are raised
here.
Issues that have been raised by the above review, the most recent promotion into
production, and previous Review Board meetings are reviewed for relevance,
progress toward resolution and escalation.
Issues are assigned to individual board members for resolution. Issues that can be
resolved by the Board without further assignment are resolved and documented. Issues
that have been resolved are approved for closure.
All E-Change activity since the last scheduled promotion into production window are
reviewed to determine if the Emergency or Expedite status was warranted, if the
packages prepared in support of the changes are complete and if the quality associated
with the E-Changes is in line with the quality of Board scheduled changes.
Issues with either the work done in support of individual changes or the E-
Change process itself are raised, documented and assigned for resolution.
The changes proposed by the Change Management system are reviewed for
completeness, sponsorship, business impact and technical feasibility. Together,
Implementers and Change Requesters present their proposed changes to the Board
for approval to proceed.
Examine, with the help of technical staff, the proposed implementation schedule for the
proposed changes.
Where business or technical impacts are likely to occur, evaluate the business case for
proceeding and, if the risks are acceptable, approve the promotion. Authorize
communication to all affected parties to apprise them of the potential impact. If the risk
is not acceptable, remove the change from the promotion package. Where no business
or technical impact is anticipated approve the Change for promotion.
Receive requests to formally enter changes into the Change Management system.
Examine the requests for completeness, business justification and technical feasibility.
Review the Change Calendar for potential impacts with either the customer environment or
planned change activity. Schedule a preliminary promotion date on the calendar.
Review the document for the most recent promotion activity including, number of
changes promoted, number of successful changes promoted, number of changed
promoted with modification, number of changes backed out of the promotion schedule
and number of incident records associated with changes promoted.
11. Identify and assign for resolution issues associated with the Change Process
Evaluate the trends and, as required, modify the documents , the measurements,
the procedures or the Change Process.
Review with the Change Coordinator, the communications that will proceed from the
meeting to ensure that all issues are communicated, all parties are included and what is
being communicated is the intent of the Board.
Measurements
A number of standard reports on all changes activity are available from the Change
Control Coordinator. These reports are available to anyone who has a need for the
information. If interested in seeing what is available, please contact the Change
Coordinator.
In addition to the standard reports available, all change activity is reported on a monthly
basis in the standard Information Technology Periodical Measurement Meeting
(preferred monthly). These measurements include, at minimum, the following:
Changes logged versus not logged
Changes with incomplete information
Types of changes by category
Number of approved, rejected or rescheduled changes by type
Number of changes by risk / impact
Number of unsuccessful changes by failure type
Number of changes with inadequate information
Number of successful changes by category
Hours of outage caused by changes
Number of rescheduled changes
Glossary
This section contains definitions of terms relevant to the Change Management process.
Term Definition
Information about the result of change activation activities (that is,
Activation Status status and level of success / completeness of the activation).
Approval Lead
Times See Lead Times.
Approved Change A change request that has been accepted, assessed and approved,
Request and scheduled for execution.
Authorized Change An individual authorized to the Peregrine Service Center to enter
Initiator changes into the system.
Back out Execution
Status Information about the result of back out procedures.
For failed changes, a plan that restores service to previously existing
Back out Plan levels.
Back out Problem Defect information created and sent to the Problem Management
Notification process as a result of executing back out procedures.
A request to execute appropriate back out procedures, as defined in
Back out Request the change back out plan. This request is issued when the completion
criteria of an implementation step has not been met.
Business considerations and rules that may influence the way
Business Policy processes are managed and executed.
A Change consists of any installation or alteration of hardware, system
or application software, procedures, or environmental facilities, which
adds to, deletes from or modifies the Information Technology
environment or its attached network.
Performance improvement
Growth
Technology change
Term Definition
Principles, rules, specifications and prescribed steps to plan, control
Change Standards and execute changes.
The formal document within the change management system that
Change Record displays change details and the status of the change.
Formatted information about the result of change planning and
implementation activities, communicated to users and customers of
the process. This includes information about the progress of change
Change Reports requests (for example, approval status), change plans (for example,
Consolidated Change Schedule), change results (for example,
problem resolution), process health, etc.
A request identifying the IT resource(s) to be changed and a
Change Request description of the change. Change requests may be submitted by any
authorized change initiator.
Change Request To A change request which was not approved because the proposed
Be Rescheduled schedule cannot be accepted.
A validation of the impact of the proposed change on SIB from a
Business business perspective, an evaluation of the completeness of the
Assessment success criteria and communication plan and a review of the backup /
backout / recovery plans.
A review of the completeness of the change plan, test plan, backup /
Technical
backout / recovery plans, platform impact assessment, estimated
Assessment install time, etc. from a technical perspective.
There are three change types:
Emergency: Changes that are vital to meeting a business
need
and cannot conform to the normal change process, particularly the
assessment and approval phases.
Change Type Exception: Changes that are vital to meeting a business
need but
cannot conform to the normal change process, particularly
lead
times.
Normal: Changes that follow the change process to the
letter.
Scheduled time periods established for implementing changes so as
to minimize the impact to services and their users. Change windows
Change Window may vary, depending on the account, on the services, and on the
technical environment. The change windows are documented and
made available to all individuals involved in the change process.
A report of all changes to be implemented during a given period of
time (for example, a week or month), specifying the date and time
Consolidated
when each change is scheduled be implemented. The Consolidated
Change Schedule Change Schedule also contains information about change
dependencies and interactions.
A change that is vital to meeting a business need and cannot conform
to the normal change process, particularly the assessment and
Emergency Change approval phases. Emergency changes must be approved or endorsed
by either the Director of Information Technology or the Change
Management Process Owner prior to implementation.
The endorsement of a change may be necessary where exceptional
circumstances dictate that the normal change process cannot be
followed. Endorsement includes the authorization to proceed for
Endorsement changes that are not fully approved, and the authorization to stop a
scheduled change from proceeding, pending rescheduling. Who is
authorized to endorse must be documented and must be reachable at
all times.
Referring unresolved issues that arise during process activities to
Escalation appropriate and increasing levels of authority to obtain resolution.
Term Definition
Changes that are vital to meeting a business need but cannot conform
Exception Change to the normal change process, usually lead times.
Information Technology standards that may influence the way
IT Change Standard changes are introduced and managed in the Information Technology
environment.
A change request which has been accepted by the Change
Coordinator. Acceptance includes checking that all required data
Initial Change
elements, as defined by the Information Technology change policy for
Request administration, have been completed. Acceptance also commits this
request to the change process and all associated activities.
The Change Requesters documentation of the potential impact of the
Initial Impact change on SIB.
The time intervals required to allow proper analysis and approval of
changes prior to their scheduled implementation. There are two lead
times, which must be defined for each Change Category to meet
Information Technology Requirements.:
Analysis Times are based on the category of the change and
reflect the time interval from when the change request is submitted to
Lead Times when it is available for review. This lead time is to ensure that there
is sufficient time between raising and accepting a change request to
allow the organization to properly analyze its implications.
Approval Lead Times shows the time before the scheduled
activation date that changes should be approved. This period is to
allow the proper management and control of the change activation to
be set up.
Normal Change A change that follows the change process to the letter.
Operating The environment in which an organization performs day-to-day
Environment operating activities.
Original The Information Technology managed resources and environment
Environment before the change is implemented.
Outage A disruption of service in a system.
A problem is any deviation from an expected norm. That is, a problem
is any event resulting in a loss or potential loss of the availability or
performance to a service delivery resource and / or its supporting
environment. This includes errors related to systems, networks,
Problem workstations and their connectivity; hardware, software, and
applications. The recognition of problems can come from any point in
the environment and can be identified using a variety of automated
and non-automated methods.
Defect information about a failing IT resource or service sent to the
Problem Notification Problem Management process for resolution.
A non-approved deviation from a formally documented Information
Process Compliance
Technology process. Process compliance issues are documented in
Issue detail and submitted to the Change Review Board for resolution.
A required improvement to one or more related processes associated
with delivery of contracted services or support of the Information
Process
Technology infrastructure environment. Required process
Improvement improvements are documented in detail and submitted to the Change
Review Board for further handling.
Any process tendency, positive or negative, discovered as a result of
Process Trend analyzing completed requests and reviewing process measurements
and reports.
A system or component of a system that is responsible for the actual
Production Platform running of a business function.
Term Definition
The process of determining whether a process, product, or service
Quality Assurance met its requirements within the given constraints in the most efficient
manner possible.
Rejected Change Notification that the request does not comply with change process
Request criteria and, therefore, was rejected.
A request for action issued by the Change Management process to
Request (To
another process (for example, to the Problem Management process to
Another Process) log and handle Change related problems).
Requester Information identifying the requester of the change (for example,
Information requester’s name, area / department, phone, e-mail address, etc.).
The Information Technology managed resources and environment
Restored
that are returned to their original condition as the result of the
Environment execution of change back out procedures.
A change request proposed for execution at a certain date and time.
The date and time need to be assessed and approved before
Scheduled Change
execution can actually start. If the proposed date and time are
Request rejected during the approval step, then the request must be
rescheduled.
Service Delivery The hardware, software, network, procedures required for IT to deliver
Environment services to end-users.
Service Level Thresholds and service windows that may influence the way
Commitments Information Technology processes are managed and executed.
Target Lead Times See Lead Times.
Technical
Principles, rules, and specifications that must be taken into account
Assessment
Standards when considering the technical impact of a change.
Technical documentation about products involved in the change, as
Technical provided by the product supplier / manufacturer. This includes
Information information about the resources to be changed and information about
the tools used to implement the change.
Analysis of process behavior to discover both positive and negative
Trend Analysis patterns.
Trigger An event that initiates another event.