Free Vibration Damping Analysis Guide
Free Vibration Damping Analysis Guide
I. INTRODUCTION
1
SEISMIC RESISTANCE ANALYSIS
FREE VIBRATION WITH DAMPING SAN PEDRO UNIVERSITY
II. OBJECTIVES
Let's suppose that a structural system has been modeled as the one
is shown in the figure.
In this figure, m and k represent the mass and the spring constant.
respectively, and c will be the viscous damping coefficient.
model
2
SEISMIC RESISTANT ANALYSIS
FREE VIBRATION WITH DAMPING SAN PEDRO UNIVERSITY
From the free body diagram, and applying Newton's second law,
the sum of forces is made in such a way that:
…. (*)
The equation (*) is called the fundamental equation of dynamics.
structural for the damped case.
Solving the differential equation (*):
… (*.1)
…. (*.2)
SEISMIC ANALYSIS 3
FREE VIBRATION WITH DAMPING SAN PEDRO UNIVERSITY
u ( x , t )=ϕ ( x ) Y(t)
SEISMIC ANALYSIS 4
FREE VIBRATION WITH DAMPING SAN PEDRO UNIVERSITY
Δu ( x,t )= Δϕ ( x ) Y(t)
Delta
˙ ( x,t u)= Δϕ ( x ) Ẏ(t)
Where:
f=mu=mϕ
i ¨ Y¨
f=cΔu=cΔϕY
d ˙ ˙
fs=kΔu=kΔϕY
That being replaced in the application of virtual work, the following results
equation of motion in terms of generalized coordinates
m¿ Y+c
¨ ¿ Y+kY=
˙ ¿ p(t)¿
5
SEISMIC RESISTANCE ANALYSIS
FREE VIBRATION WITH DAMPING SAN PEDRO UNIVERSITY
m¿ = ∑ 2
m phi i i
i
c¿= ∑
cΔϕ2i i
i
k ¿= ∑
kΔϕ2i i
i
p¿ = ∑
pϕ i I
I
p¿ =g¨ L
L= ∑
mφ i i
i
c¿= ∑
cΔφ2i=2 λi m ¿ ω
i
Where ω the circular frequency of the generalized system is represented and is given
by
√
k¿
ω=
m¿
Y p¿ Y
V max = ∑
2 I
pI ϕ=
i
2
ω2 Y 2 ω 2 Y 2m¿
2 ∑
2
T max= m φ
i i =
I 2
6
SEISMIC RESISTANCE ANALYSIS
FREE VIBRATION WITH DAMPING SAN PEDRO UNIVERSITY
√
p¿
ω=
m¿ Y
√
m¿ Y
T =2 π
p¿
√
∑i wi u2i
T =2 π
g ∑ pI ui
i
Calculate the fundamental period, the configuration of the first mode and the
natural frequency of the structure shown below, using the method
of Rayleigh.
m1=m2=m3=0.25 kip·s2 /2
m4 =0.23 kip·s2 /2
SEISMIC ANALYSIS 7
FREE VIBRATION WITH DAMPING SAN PEDRO UNIVERSITY
Solution
Lateral loads in the Rayleigh method are given by the forces from
inertia, that is, the product of each mass with its respective acceleration.
Since we only know the masses, the inertial forces are chosen.
arbitrarily, with descending values from the higher masses towards
the lower ones.
Floor cutting
V 4 =P4 =8kip
8
SEISMIC RESISTANCE ANALYSIS
FREE VIBRATION WITH DAMPING SAN PEDRO UNIVERSITY
V1 8
Δ 1= = =0.0444∈¿
k 1180
V 2 14
Δ 2= = =0.0778∈¿
k 2180
V 3 18
Δ 3= = =0.1000∈¿
k 3180
V4 20
Δ4 = = =0.1111∈¿
k 4180
v1 =Δ1 =0.1111∈¿
v3 =Δ 1+ Δ2 + Δ 3=0.1111+0.1000+ 0.0778=0.2889∈¿
v 4= Δ1 + Δ 2+ Δ3 + Δ 4 =0.1111+0.1000+0.0778+0.0444=0.3333∈¿
5. Shape function
v 4 0.3333
ϕ 4= = =1.0000
v 40.3333
v 3 0.2889
ϕ 3= = =0.8667
v 40.3333
v 2 0.2111
ϕ 2= = =0.6333
v 40.3333
v 1 0.1111
ϕ 1= = =0.3333
v 40.3333
6. Generalized mass
SEISMIC ANALYSIS 9
FREE VIBRATION WITH DAMPING SAN PEDRO UNIVERSITY
m¿ = ∑
m ϕ2i i
4
m ¿ =(0.23) (12 ) + ( 0.25 ) ( 0.86672) + ( 0.25 ) ( 0.63332) + ( 0.25 ) ( 0.33332) =¿ 0.5458 kip·s2 /2
Generalized force
p¿ = ∑
pϕ i i
4
8. Fundamental period
√ √
m¿ Y ( 0.5458(0.3333)
)
T =2 π =2π =0.6618s
p¿ (16.4)
9. Natural frequency
√ √
p¿ (16.4)
ω= ¿ =
=9.4941 rad/s
mY ( 0.5458(0.3333)
)
v 1 0.1111
a 11= = =1.0000
v 10.1111
v 2 0.2111
a 21= = =1.9000
v 10.1111
v3 0.2889
a 31= = =2.6000
v 10.1111
v 1 0.3333
a 41= = =3.0000
v 10.1111
RAYLEIGH METHOD
m
(K*s^2/in
Level K (k/in) ) P (K) V (K) ∆ ( V/K) v Φ (mi)(Φi^2) (Pi)(Φi)
180 8 0.0444
0.866
3 0.25 6 0.2889 7 0.1878 5.2000
SEISMIC ANALYSIS 10
FREE VIBRATION WITH DAMPING SAN PEDRO UNIVERSITY
180 14 0.0778
0.633
2 0.25 4 0.2111 3 0.1003 2.5333
180 18 0.1000
0.333
1 0.25 2 0.1111 3 0.0278 0.6667
0.000
180 20 0.1111 0.0000 0 0.5458 16.4000
applied statically.
11
SEISMIC RESISTANCE ANALYSIS
FREE VIBRATION WITH DAMPING SAN PEDRO UNIVERSITY
APPLICATION EXERCISE
Solution:
This structure can be modeled by the two-mass and two-system.
springs. For the application of the Rayleigh method, let us assume that
The deformation produces displacements y1=1 and y2=2 the maximum
potential energy is then:
12
SEISMIC RESISTANCE ANALYSIS
FREE VIBRATION WITH DAMPING SAN PEDRO UNIVERSITY
SEISMIC ANALYSIS 13
FREE VIBRATION WITH DAMPING SAN PEDRO UNIVERSITY
And solving
SEISMIC ANALYSIS 14
FREE VIBRATION WITH DAMPING SAN PEDRO UNIVERSITY
V. CONCLUSIONES
The success of the method depends on how close the deformation is.
supposed deformation of the actual structure.
15
EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT ANALYSIS
FREE VIBRATION WITH DAMPING SAN PEDRO UNIVERSITY
VI. BIBLIOGRAPHY
SEISMIC ANALYSIS 16