Scribd
Upload
48 views1 page

Debate Task Evaluation Criteria

The document outlines a grading rubric for a student debate task, categorizing performance into four levels: Outstanding, Good, Marginal, and Novice. Each category assesses quality of information, critical thinking, collaboration, and professional language. The rubric provides specific criteria for evaluating students' engagement and effectiveness in the debate.

Uploaded by

tamonlangjohnlloyd
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
48 views1 page

Debate Task Evaluation Criteria

The document outlines a grading rubric for a student debate task, categorizing performance into four levels: Outstanding, Good, Marginal, and Novice. Each category assesses quality of information, critical thinking, collaboration, and professional language. The rubric provides specific criteria for evaluating students' engagement and effectiveness in the debate.

Uploaded by

tamonlangjohnlloyd
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Scenario: I assigned my students a task to engage in a debate on a specific societal

issue.
Category Outstanding (5) Good (4) Marginal (3) Novice (2)

Quality of Information Information Information Information has


Information clearly relates to clearly relates to clearly relates little or nothing
the main topic the main topic. It to the main to do with the
and add new provides at least topic. No details main topic or
concepts, supporting detail and or simply restates
information. It or example. examples are the main
includes several Occasionally given. Provides concept. It does
supporting provides sources few reliable not advance the
details and/or for the sources. discussion. Does
examples. arguments. not provide
Consistently reliable sources
establishes for arguments
reliable source
for the
arguments.
Critical Establishes Some critical Responds to Does not
Thinking critical thinking thinking and questions but respond to
process reflection are does not engage questions pose
consistently demonstrated in in premise by the opposing
through discussion by the reflection. team.
responding to the responder.
rebuttals of the
opposing team
others. Is a
quality response
that advances
thoughts forward;
adds to the
discussion is a
critical response.
Collaboration Encourages and Encourages a Limited Responds to the
facilitates little and interactions to discussion with
Interaction facilitates other members facilitator only.
among members interaction of the team No interaction
of the team. among members with peers
Reflects and of the team.
evaluates own Responds to
practices. other members
of the team.
Professional Professional Professional Professional Professional
Language vocabulary and vocabulary and vocabulary and vocabulary and
discourse style discourse style witting style are discourse style
are used are used used are not used.
consistently frequently occasionally
throughout the throughout the throughout the
discussion. discussion discussion

You might also like