0% found this document useful (0 votes)
148 views8 pages

SAP2000 NTC 2018 Beam-Column Analysis

The document presents a software verification example using SAP2000 to analyze a continuous beam-column under combined compression and bending according to the NTC-2018 steel frame design code. It details the geometry, material properties, loading conditions, and technical features tested, along with a comparison of results from SAP2000 and independent hand calculations, showing exact agreement. The conclusion confirms that the software's output matches the independent results for all tested parameters.

Uploaded by

suncxo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
148 views8 pages

SAP2000 NTC 2018 Beam-Column Analysis

The document presents a software verification example using SAP2000 to analyze a continuous beam-column under combined compression and bending according to the NTC-2018 steel frame design code. It details the geometry, material properties, loading conditions, and technical features tested, along with a comparison of results from SAP2000 and independent hand calculations, showing exact agreement. The conclusion confirms that the software's output matches the independent results for all tested parameters.

Uploaded by

suncxo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Software Verification

PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000


REVISION NO.: 3

NTC 2018 Example 001

WIDE FLANGE SECTION UNDER COMBINED COMPRESSION & BENDING

EXAMPLE DESCRIPTION
In this example a continuous beam-column is subjected to factored axial load P =
1400 kN and y-axis bending moment M = 200 kN-m. The beam is continuously
braced to avoid any buckling effects. This example was tested using the Italian
NTC-2018 steel frame design code. The design capacities are compared with
independent hand calculated results.

GEOMETRY, PROPERTIES AND LOADING

A M

A
L Section A-A

L = 0.4 m

Material Properties Loading Design Properties


E = 210x103 MPa P = 1400 kN fy = 235 MPa
v = 0.3 M = 200 kN-m Section: 457x191x98 UB
G = 80769 MPa

TECHNICAL FEATURES TESTED


 Section compactness check (beam-column)
 Section compression capacity
 Section shear capacity
 Section bending capacity with compression & shear reductions
 Interaction capacity, D/C

NTC 2018 Example 001 - 1


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 3

RESULTS COMPARISON

Independent results are taken from hand calculations based on the CSI steel
design documentation contained in the file “[Link],” which is
available through the program “Help” menu.

Percent
Output Parameter SAP2000 Independent Difference

Compactness Class 2 Class 2 0.00%


Section Compression Resistance,
2797.6 2797.6 0.00%
Nc,Rd (kN)
Section Shear Resistance,
756.6 756.6 0.00%
Vc,z,Rd (kN)
Section Plastic Bending Resistance,
499.1 499.1 0.00%
Mc,y,Rd (kN-m)
Section Bending Resistance Axially
Reduced, 310.8 310.8 0.00%
MN,y,Rd (kN-m)
Section Bending Resistance Shear
Reduced, 487.0 487.0 0.00%
MV,y,Rd (kN-m)
Interaction Capacity, D/C 0.861 0.861 0.00%

COMPUTER FILE: NTC 2018 EX001

CONCLUSION
The results show an exact comparison with the independent results.

NTC 2018 Example 001 - 2


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 3

HAND CALCULATION

Properties:
Material: S275 Steel
E = 210000 MPa
fy = 235 MPa
Section: 457x191x98 UB
A = 12,500 mm2
b = 192.8 mm, tf = 19.6 mm, h = 467.2 mm, tw = 11.4 mm, r = 10.2 mm
hw = h − 2t f = 467.2 − 2 • 19.6 = 428 mm

d = h − 2 ( t f + r ) = 467.2 − 2 • (19.6 + 10.2 ) = 407.6 mm

b − tw − 2r 192.8 − 11.4 − 2 • 10.2


=c = = 80.5 mm
2 2
Wpl,y = 2,230,000 mm3
Other:
1.05
γM 0 =

Loadings:
P = 1400 kN axial load
M y = 200 kN-m bending load at one end

Results in the following internal forces:


N Ed = 1400 kN

VEd = 500 kN
M y , Ed = 200 kN-m

NTC 2018 Example 001 - 3


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 3

Section Compactness:
235 235
=ε = = 1
fy 235

1  h 1 N Ed 
=
α  − − ( t f + r ) , 0 ≤ α ≤1
c  2 2 tw f y 

1  467.2 1 ( −1, 400, 000 ) 


=
α  − • − (19.6 + 10.2
= )  1.141 > 1, so
407.6  2 2 11.4 • 235 
α =1.0

Localized Buckling for Flange:


For the tip in compression under combined bending & compression
9ε 9 • 1
λ cl .1 = = = 9
α 1
c 80.5
λe = = = 4.11
t f 19.6

λ e 4.11 < λ=
= cl .1 9
So Flange is Class 1 in combined bending and compression

Localized Buckling for Web:


α > 0.5, so
396ε 396 • 1
λ=
cl .1 = = 33.00 for combined bending & compression
13α − 1 13 • 1 − 1
d 407.6
λe = = = 35.75
tw 11.4
λ e 35.75 > =
= λ cl .1 33.00
456ε 456 • 1
λ=
cl .2 = = 38.00
13α − 1 13 • 1 − 1
λ e 35.75 < λ
= = cl .2 38.00

NTC 2018 Example 001 - 4


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 3

So Web is Class 2 in combined bending & compression.

Since Web is Class 2, Section is Class 2 in combined bending & compression.

Section Compression Capacity


Af y 12,500 • 235
N=
c , Rd N pl=
, Rd =
γM 0 1.05

N c , Rd = 2797.6 kN

Section Shear Capacity


η = 1.20 for fy ≤ 460 N/mm2, and (EC3-1-5 5.1(2), NTC § [Link].2.4)
η = 1.0 otherwise (EC3-1-5 5.1(2), NTC § [Link].2.4)

η = 1.0

Avz =A − 2bt f + t f ( tw + 2r ) ≥ η hwtw


= 12,500 − 2 • 192.8 • 19.6 + 19.6 (11.4 + 2 • 10.2 ) ≥ 1.2 • 428 • 11.4
= 5,565.5 mm 2 ≥ 5,855.04 mm 2
= 5,855.04 mm 2
fy 235
Vc , z , Rd
= = Avz • 5,855.04
γM 0 3 1.05 3

Vc , z , Rd = 756.567 kN

hw 428 72 235 72 235


== 37.5 < = 60
=
tw 11.4 η fy 1.2 235

So no shear buckling needs to be checked.

NTC 2018 Example 001 - 5


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 3

Section Bending Capacity


W pl , y f y 2, 230, 000 • 235
M
= c , y , Rd M=
pl , y , Rd =
γM 0 1.05

M c , y , Rd = 499.1kN-m

with Shear Reduction


V=
Ed 500 kN > 0.5 • Vc ,=
Rd 378.3kN Shear Reduction is needed

Av = hwtw = 428.0 • 11.4 = 4,879.2 mm 2

2 2
 2VEd   2 • 500 
ρ
=  − 1=  − 1 = 0.1035
V   756.567 
 c , Rd 

 ρAv 2   0.1035 • 4879.22 


W f
 pl , y 4t  yk  2, 230, 000 −
−  • 235
 w   4 • 11.4 
=M V , y , Rd = ≤ M c , y , Rd
γM 0 1.05

M V , y , Rd = 486.998 kN-m

with Compression Reduction

N Ed 1400
=n = = 0.50
N pl , Rd 2797.6
A − 2bt f 12,500 − 2 • 192.8 • 19.6
=a = = 0.40 ≤ 0.5
A 12,500
1− n 1 − 0.5
M N=
, y , Rd M pl , y , Rd = 499.1 •
1 − 0.5a 1 − 0.5 • 0.4
M N , y , Rd = 310.8 kN-m

NTC 2018 Example 001 - 6


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 3

Interaction Capacity: Compression & Bending


Section Bending & Compression Capacity
Formula NTC 4.2.38
2 5n 2
D  M y , Ed   M z , Ed   200  M y , Ed
=   + =   0 0.414 ≤
+= = 0.644
C  M N , y , Rd   M N , z , Rd   310.8  M N , y , Rd

D
= 0.644
C

Member Bending & Compression Capacity: Method B


k factors used are taken from the software, and determined from Method 2 in
Annex B of Eurocode 3.

k yy = 0.900

k yz = 0.420

k zy = 0.600

k zz = 0.700

Formula NTC C4.2.37


D N Ed M y , Ed M z , Ed
= + k yy + k yz
C χ y Af yk W f W pl , z f yk
χ LT pl , y yk
γM1 γM1 γM1

D 1, 400 200
= + 0.90 × +0
C 1×12,500 × 235 1×
2, 230, 000 × 235
1.05 1.05

D
=0.5 + 0.361 + 0
C

NTC 2018 Example 001 - 7


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 3

D
= 0.861
C

Formula NTC C4.2.38


D N Ed M y , Ed M z , Ed
= + k zy + k zz
C χ z Af yk W f W pl , z f yk
χ LT pl , y yk
γM1 γM1 γM1

D 1, 400 200
= + 0.600 × +0
C 1×12,500 × 235 1×
2, 230, 000 × 235
1.05 1.05
D
=0.5 + 0.24 + 0 = 0.74
C

D
= 0.861 (Governs)
C

NTC 2018 Example 001 - 8

You might also like