0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views6 pages

Endogenous vs. Solow Growth Models

The document discusses the limitations of the Solow growth model, particularly its failure to account for technological advances and the disparities in economic growth rates among countries. It introduces the Endogenous Growth Model, which emphasizes the role of public policy, human capital, and externalities in promoting sustained economic growth. The model suggests that differences in savings rates and technology levels can lead to persistent income gaps between capital-poor and capital-rich countries.

Uploaded by

workaw55
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views6 pages

Endogenous vs. Solow Growth Models

The document discusses the limitations of the Solow growth model, particularly its failure to account for technological advances and the disparities in economic growth rates among countries. It introduces the Endogenous Growth Model, which emphasizes the role of public policy, human capital, and externalities in promoting sustained economic growth. The model suggests that differences in savings rates and technology levels can lead to persistent income gaps between capital-poor and capital-rich countries.

Uploaded by

workaw55
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

3. Growth Models … 3.3.2.

Endogenous Growth Model


• Recall: The neoclassical (Solow) model, in the absence of external
“shocks” or technological change, which is not explained in the model, all
economies will converge to zero growth.

• A sustained increase in per capita income arises purely from


technological change, commonly referred to as the Solow residual, not
attributed to changes in labor or capital.

• Thus, the Solow model suggests that low capital-labour ratio in


developing countries allows investment injection to have higher labour
productivity.

• The Solow model prescribes a policy that creates an enabling


environment to attract additional investment; nonetheless, no significant
achievement was observed among countries.

• Because of this, capital rather tends to flow from poor to rich countries
seeking for higher returns.
• Why?
41
3. Growth Models … 3.3.2. Endogenous Growth Model
• Two major draw backs of the Solow Model:
– (a) It does not analyze the determinants of technological advance because
technology is assumed to be completely independent of the decisions of
economic agents (or the model).
– (b) It fails to explain large differences in residuals across countries with similar
technologies

• New Endogenous growth theory explains:


– (a) growth rate differentials across countries and
– (b) factors that determine the rate of growth of GDP that is left
unexplained/exogenously determined in the Solow model (A or also called the
Solow residual).

• Endogenous growth model assumes increasing returns to scale.


• It explains the role of externalities.
• Public and private investments in human capital generate external
economies and productivity improvements that offset the natural
tendency for diminishing returns.

• According to the model, exacerbated wealth disparities between


developed and developing countries arises because high rates of return
on investment offered by developing economies with low capital-labor
ratios are eroded by lower levels of complementary investments in
human capital (education), infrastructure, or (R&D). 42
3. Growth Models … 3.3.2. Endogenous Growth Model
• Thus, an active role for public policy in promoting economic development
through direct and indirect investments in human capital formation and the
encouragement of FDI in knowledge-intensive industries.

A Simplified Version of the Romer Endogenous Model


• The model addresses technological spillovers (in which one firm or
industry’s productivity gains lead to productivity gains in other firms or
industries) during the process of industrialization.
• Each industry individually produces with constant returns to scale, so the
model is consistent with perfect competition; and matches assumptions of
the Solow model.
• Economy-wide capital stock, K, positively affects output at the industry
level so that there may be increasing returns to scale at the economy-wide
level.
• Each firm’s capital stock includes knowledge and knowledge is a public
good, spilling over instantly to the other firms in the economy.

43
3. Growth Models … 3.3.2. Endogenous Growth Model
• Assuming production function of each firm is given by:
𝑌𝑖 = 𝐴𝐾𝑖𝛼 𝐿1−𝛼
𝑖
ഥ𝛽 … (1)
𝐾
• Assuming symmetry among firms, industry level production function
becomes:
𝑌 = 𝐴𝐾 𝛼+𝛽 𝐿1−𝛼 … (2)
• Assume, no technical progress (A is constant) for the time being, using
chain rule we have:
𝑑𝑌 𝜕𝑌 𝜕𝐾 𝜕𝑌 𝜕𝐿
= +
𝑑𝑡 𝜕𝐾 𝑑𝑡 𝜕𝐿 𝜕𝑡
𝛿𝐾 𝛿𝐿
= [𝐴(𝛼 + 𝛽)𝐾 𝛼+𝛽−1 𝐿1−𝛼 ] +[𝐴 1 − 𝛼 𝐾 𝛼+𝛽 𝐿1−𝛼−1 ]
𝛿𝑡 𝛿𝑡
𝐾ሶ 𝐿ሶ
=[𝐴𝐾 𝛼+𝛽 𝐿1−𝛼 ][ α+𝛽 . + 1−𝛼 . ] or
𝐾 𝐿
ሶ 𝐾ሶ 𝐿ሶ
𝑌 = 𝑌[ 𝛼 + 𝛽 +(1-𝛼) ]….(3)
𝐾 𝐿
𝑌ሶ 𝐾ሶ 𝐿ሶ
Assuming steady state: , and are constant as in the Solow model, and
𝑌 𝐾 𝐿
𝐾ሶ 𝑠𝑌 𝑌ሶ
ሶ I − δ𝐾 = sY − δ𝐾, then
𝐾= = − 𝛿= = 𝑔 …(4)
𝐾 𝐾 𝑌 44
3. Growth Models … 3.3.2. Endogenous Growth Model
Using (3&4):
𝑌ሶ 𝐾ሶ 𝐿ሶ
+=(𝛼+ (1 −𝛽) 𝛼) =
𝑌 𝐾 𝐿
𝑔 = 𝛼+𝛽 𝑔+ 1−α 𝑛
𝑛 1−𝛼
𝑔(1 − 𝛼 + 𝛽) = 1 − 𝛼 𝑛 or 𝑔 = = sc − 𝛿 where 𝑐 = 𝑌/𝐾
(1−𝛼−𝛽)
𝑛 1−𝛼 −𝑛(1−𝛼−𝛽) 𝛽𝑛
Growth rate of per capita income: 𝑔 − 𝑛 = = = [𝑠𝑐 − δ]-n
(1−𝛼−𝛽) (1−𝛼−𝛽)

If “A” is not constant:


𝑑𝑌 𝜕𝑌 𝜕𝐴 𝜕𝑌 𝜕𝐾 𝜕𝑌 𝜕𝐿
= + +
𝑑𝑡 𝜕𝐴 𝑑𝑡 𝜕𝐿 𝜕𝐾 𝜕𝐿 𝑑𝑡
𝜕𝐴 𝛿𝐾 𝛿𝐿
=𝐾 𝛼+𝛽 𝐿1−𝛼 + [𝐴(𝛼 + 𝛽)𝐾 𝛼+𝛽−1 𝐿1−𝛼 ] +[𝐴 1 − 𝛼 𝐾 𝛼+𝛽 𝐿1−𝛼−1 ]
𝜕𝑡 𝛿𝑡 𝛿𝑡
𝐴ሶ 𝐾ሶ 𝐿ሶ
= [𝐴𝐾 𝛼+𝛽 𝐿1−𝛼 ] + [𝐴(𝛼 + 𝛽)𝐾 𝛼+𝛽 𝐿1−𝛼 ] + 𝐴 1 − 𝛼 𝐾 𝛼+𝛽 𝐿1−𝛼
𝐴 𝐾 𝐿
𝑑𝑌
= 𝑌[𝜔 + 𝜂(𝛼 + 𝛽) + 𝑛(1 − 𝛼)]
𝑑𝑡
𝑌ሶ
= g = 𝜔 + 𝜂(𝛼 + 𝛽) + 𝑛(1 − 𝛼)
𝑌

Growth rate of per capita:


𝑔 − 𝑛 = 𝜔 + 𝜂 𝛼 + 𝛽 + 𝑛(1- 𝛼 )-n= 𝝎 + 𝜼 𝜶 + 𝜷 − 𝜶n
𝑌ሶ 𝐾ሶ 𝐿ሶ 𝐴ሖ 45
Where g= ; η = = = n; = 𝜔
𝑌 𝐾 𝐿 𝐴
3. Growth Models … 3.3.2. Endogenous Growth Model
• Savings and human capital are important for achieving
rapid growth. Two outcomes of the model:

• (a) No long-run equilibration of growth rates across closed


economies. Growth rates differ across countries,
depending on savings rates and technology levels.

• (b) No tendency for per capita income levels in capital-


poor countries to catch up with those in rich countries
even if they have similar savings and population growth
rates.

• Thus, a temporary or prolonged recession in one country


can lead to a permanent increase in the income gap
between itself and wealthier countries.

46

You might also like