Lesson A: Digital Divides
me century ushered in
ind gronndl
breaking developments in ICT. In this lesson, we will
lespite functionit
ies, and nations, I 4 means of connecting people, commu:
ns, ICT
can. still trigger what we ea
mn the mid-1990s, as the Internet ene a 0 ita Ee
ential, governments and i S gaining milenge and manifesting its immense
saineithepad nternational organizations have been looking into ways
solve global issues. On the onset of new millennium, it has
vente clerks AGES {f new millennium, it
Plays an important role in making our world
a better place
This initiative began by: zeroing in on the specifics: How can ICT help alleviate
ty; improve the delivery of education and health care, and make government services
© accessible? How can it improve our daily lives?
slobal events have proven how ICT can turn the tide in favor of economic
ery. In the US, for instance, investments in ICT mitigated the effects of the global
in 2009 when US President Barack Obama laid out his plan for an
ncreased spending for broadband, electronic medical records, green energy investments,
and ICT infrastructures for schools and libraries, to make the US competitive while also
stimulating creation of new jobs.
When the COVID-19 pandemic affected most: countries of the world, ICT rose to
prove its principal function—to build bridges and establish connes
and nations. Governments made full use of digital technology as it waged a battle against
an invisible enemy, the COVID-19 virus. Private and public sector tumed to digital
ns between. people
Lesson Objectives
Ai the end of he lesson, the
learners should be abe to
‘Sacuse the nurs ofthe ch,
vide
+ cla some factors whi
digital dads; ond
abort on how digi!
rides cr
Essential Question
What isthe digital diva
Why is thera @ ighl id
3. Wht sector of he society
suflers mot from he digit
Gide?
Motivational Activity
During the remote leoring
yor 2020-2021, cit he it
“iil hat you ond your
clossmotes faced. Build ods
Sih these challenges come ¢
the woy Pethops you con alt
{acu how you wish 10 ove
these odveriies in online
remote leoming
(Source: Wikipresence. hp
commons [Link]/t
Fle:Kids wih loop i
LESSON 4: DIGITAL OMIOES,tpl die is erm vsed
‘epreset the gop tht ens
heen howzehol, communis,
ts ond notions wh regard
‘ccs o ICT copa, hls,
ces, and cies.”
to track data such yy
ing, dedicated webst*
1d to the erisis BY puilding maa
i ee ed where andl ove ro obtain eid from he COVEN 1“
a ae 4 touchin base with colleagues and workmates, usiig the ‘
1 to turn in important work di ee
email
Existing apPss
of cities placed under locke
1 shopping apps: hav
arantine menstires
vg through its relevant $
‘econtial supplies. Most impo
ce v1) ner Pm cs wsers to ep th
cat rete fastest way possible
nc avail medical assistance
Jocal and global in SeoPe> tend to bring to light social
seme, for inseance, exposed ais
he most meager resources £2 COPE
rable to the csease de to POE nutrition
food delivery and
own and extreme a
ortantly, the Philippit
at to get their most
tate agencies,
yyealth condition an
Social phenomena, both the
inequities. The COVID-19 pand
the poor and unemployed having
antine and the most vuln
parities in income, with
with the extende
state-sanctioned 4
and lack of medical. access
“The phenomena. of the digital revolution and the dramatic changes it Drought: has
sso brought to light some simple questions that we may ask in the context of the widely
accepted fact that the Internet has vd.a broad and far-ranging impact tO all nations and
societies. a diferent scenario altogether
Digital Divide Defined
‘The term digital divide was first used in 1995 by he US National ‘Telecommumien
Some an Information Administration (NTIA) in a report titled “Falling Through
the Net: New Data on the Digital Divide” The report analyzed the low accessibility
of telephones and computers among low-income groups.
sae a ‘van Djike defined digital divide as “the gap between those who
Pa : not a access to computers and the Internet” (2006). From the OECD
it is “the gap between individuals, households, busi
. ; s, businesses, and geographic
areas ee socioeconomic levels with regard both to their da ©
access and to their use of the Internet for a wide vari :
le variety of activities”
pole a (2001) referred to ICTs as “a rie box Rrieting nes
ies of power inforei
ae paced fay: be aba deeper divisions between informatie”
+ Mi he tuned-out, wists ”
Today, the digital divide exists a i ee et
ee ae mn those in city centers and those
pa anes ae literate and illiterate; between the educated 2!
‘uneducated socioeconomic :
isuaiiiadic tiebtahithiact | omic groupes. andl globally, between high-inco™™
ae industrially developed and \
within a community or within populatis beter
Pade Bete uit ane Cae with access to uneven for“!
computer, low-speed Internet connect for instance, have low-perfort
ace cecal ee onnections, and limited access to nai
i 7 s cal
pein a! ae fe, ThisBovey
ome, ny The problem is often disc sussed in the int
t,t Oy makers cite that the richer countries are far more ey
“ey IEP and are in a better positon to optimize the gains from the rapidly expanding,
ilities and. servi net, It is also best illustrated by how low-income
of the Int
bate | countries are further driven to margin by the Jock pf [Link] IEE, wile the
thoi, high- and mecium-income countries ar to leverage ICT to serve the goals of
te ay," progress and hi
an development
As early as 1998, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has
recognized that
The network society fy crenting parallel communications systems: One for thowe with
income, etueation and literally connections, given plentiful information at low cost and
hhigh speed; the other for thase without connections, blocked by high barriers of time,
‘cost, and uncertainty, and dependent upon outdated information, UNESCO (1998)
‘concurs with this proposition, stressing thatthe divide that exists between rich and poor
countries, also known as North-South divide, “may be exacerbated in situation where
‘most of the world’s population lacks basic acces to a telephone, let alone a computer.
discussion on the digital divide can be best appreciated from a comparative
pective, that is how one country is at par with other countries in terms of access
and the Internet, In the Philippines, classified by the World Bank as a
le income country, the digital divide manifests itself in various ways. For
| connection speed in the Philippines for fixed broadband Internet moved
in July 2016 to 19.28 mbps in February 2019, a 143% improvement
and a half years (Mercado 2019). However, despite these improvements,
-and fixed-line Internet speeds in the Philippines still fall below the
rom a report of ABS-CBN News, Speedtest Global stated that the
139 surveyed countries (ABS-CBN News 2019).
also an aspect worth looking at. According to the
Philippines in 2016, the Philippine
pensive in the world while offering the lowest
‘experienced vis-d-vis the cost of a
® in the Philippines (at $7.10) compared
real price of data services vis-i-vis
*y showed. that a typical Filipino
needs to log in over 10 hours
‘The same bandwidth was
Indonesia, Malaysia, andre standing problems, such as scant resources and poor infrastrictiré support
hide Te Private sector support provided (he muich-need
logical infusion, yet there is still Inck of capability atnony tenchors to inst r
ion to addre P
* of access should be broadened to include not only t
those who are Potentially vulnerable to social exclusion, such as the disabled
rsraphically remote, even sectors of society which have been stercoty' f
interested or predisposed to technological innovations, such as wornen nnd the elder!
With broadband Internet now tit
ersally recognized as a vital te
‘nomic development, we
red to make connectivity 1 key development pri
particularly in the world’s poorest nations,” re
ternational Technological Union (ITU). “Connectivity is not a luxury for the Fi
ather, it is the most powerful tool mankind has ever had at its disposal to bride
jevelopment gaps in areas like health, education, environmental management, and
empowerment,” added ‘Toure.
warked Touire, secretary general
al Inclusior
The International ‘Telecor cations Union (ITU) defines digital inclusion a
mpowering people through information and technology.” From the University ¢
V
nington's Building Digital Communities: A Framework for A
nclusion is explained as:
1e ability of individuals and groups to access and
ital inclusion encompasses not only acce
technologies. Di
vailabitity of hardware and software; relevant content und
effective use of tnformuation an
he digital literaey skills required for effe
technologies:
‘Sauce: SAMO)to the entire range
ehidon pe en "hue ing opportunities ‘and channels for skin,
fing for IC
rrmding and expt bil
oe Oa nal Developrr (USAID) has mnaintaitiey
Ean 6 Oa tk the value obtained from the digital
Pal Development tear tenure ate oe
a ta te ve and vulnerable sectors ved from
wecion that will be generat
eth to questions are 8 follows
hy tions. The refl
tintive, The two
ide the roa ced to be a fall participant im the digi
he tools and eapmbilities need
+ What are
err 1 ayatems must be in place to enable People to a,
|. What polices, platforms, and sy
Warned epi la aad
poly rome of UA sora il Dig
ein bat at al actions should be underwiy
aaa anet social policy. Hence, itis important to gain the support of legal,
cate ss. The following three A’s should guide the
Meanwhile
sion should address
: iis also aware tl
by legislation
ns international orgnnizati
policymakers in crafting legislation:
: Services and facilities should be available, affordable, and user-friendly
+ Access
in design,
Adoption ~ The
‘tizenry should realize that ICT skills are relevant to their
«Application ~ ICT should find its application in econornic and workforce deve
coment, education, health care, public safety and emergency services, civic
engagement, and socialization
Another framework about digital inclusion was proposed by Bradbrook and Fisher
(2008) who acvocsted five C's of digital ineusion:
+ Connectivity — pertains to access and connections to the structures that
provide access
+ Capability ~ can be used interchangeably with skill. Capability also needs 1
be upgraced on a regular basis, given the rapid development in the field of ICT
* Content ~ pertains to how conteit is made relevant to its users and with
‘heir contexts. For example, it should consider that conteit is provided through
ty of the people can understand. Instructions 8
vocational technology websites, for instance, shot ‘communicat
its end-users seamlessly. ee a 7
+ Confidence - means users should improve
om believe in the efficacy of ICT to improve the!
+ Continuity ~ is related to the
intricately part of the «
« language that the majori
‘dea of William Dutton on how the Internet ®
‘ety life, almost obliterating the divisions betwee?
ne ‘
‘SA mona,
90 COMMMCARONS oMoIoGy
The G
sents mot
that is am
two plat
tablets, ¢
Internet
evolution
Moree
digital ir
= Net
rem
tare,
ofs
tion
oper
* Tey
gad
tax
+ Co
bar
are:
tach
Inty
req,
willInclusion pertains to the enti
hardware and software ©
upgrading and capacity *
Toward Digital Inclusior
fhe United States Axency for International Development (USAID) hy
vs rit
in Tho retcton Uhh wl be generted
inquiry should guide the program i tive. The two qltestions are as feller: a
co tn toc Mt RANA coed Lo bel parila Sd
nn il
inchusion, it asked two questi
upon those tools and capabilities? a bon oats rene ae
inclusion is action-driven, butvit is also aware that all actions should be underwrit, :
The Global Syst)
sents mobile compa
that is anchored
+ Adoption — The citizenry should realize that ICT skills are relevant to ther
most countries. Gt
concn
evolution (LTE).
Moreover, GS
lives.
«Application — ICT should find its application in economic and workforce deve
‘opment, education, health care, public safety and emergency services, cvs
engagement, and socialization.
‘Another framework about digital in
2004) who advocated five C’s of digital inclusion:
pertains to access and connections to the structures thi
\clusion was proposed by Bradbrook and Fisher
digital inclusion:
+ Connectivity + Network i
provide access.
+ Capability
be upgraded on a regular basis,
+ Content — pertains to how content is
aple, it should consi
‘more exper
target cont
of setting,
tions indu
‘can be used interchangeably with skill. Capability also needs
given the rapid development in the field of IC
made relevant to its users and witht
der that content is provided ‘throug?
an understand. Instructions
their contexts. For exa
fa language that the majority of the people ci operating
vocational technology websites, for instance, should be able to communicate + Taxation
its end-users seamlessly gadgets a
«Confidence - means users should believe in the effieacy of ICT to improve the taxes on
lives + Consun
«© Continuity ~ is related to the idea of William Dutton on thow the Internet ® barrier {
intricately part of the everyday life, almost obliterating the Avisos ane ‘
the digital world and the everyday world. Digital inclusion should ad . ne =
the usefulness of ICT to everyday life and speak of how it could mitigate Lond
will be
problems surrounding the modern world,© ag
Ne
Is for Ae ot
for
“kin
suide th
friendly
to their
‘ce devel.
e8, civic
id Fisher
res that
needs to
{of ICT
4 withio
The Global System for Mobile
sents mobile companies across the
Association (GSMA), an organization that repre-
perlieer lobe, provides a framework for digital inclusion
; Proaclening access to the Internet. This is because enabling one's
a ie connect to the Internet is the overarching goal of digital inclusion for
MA's framework seeks to upgrade mobile Internet connection in
two platforms: first, through mobile phones, mobile modems,
5B wireless modem,
tablets, or any other mobile device; and second, through providing access to mobile
Internet via a high-speed connection, such as 4G or otherwise known as long-term
evolution (LT
Moreover, GSMA hus prioritized on obliterating the following four barriers to
digital inclusion
+ Network infrastructure and policy ~ There is a growing call to prioritize
remote, rural areas, even if the cost of installing and maintaining cell towers are
more expensive but less profitable because of the socioeconomic profile of the
Thus, there is a call for government support to share costs
target consumers.
of setting up infrastructures and providing public subsidies. Telecommunica
tions industries are also looking at alternative and renewable energy sources for
operating cell sites to lessen the costs
Taxes can restrict consumer access and increase the cost of both,
es itis also levied on usage. Reducing
ntly close the gap of the digital divide,
«+ Consumer barriers ~ Illiteracy—both the common and digital kind—is a
sponsible and efficient use of the Internet, Even. in
ucture installation for increased access has been achieved,
skills in Internet use will pose @ major challenge. Most
‘xt-based and require functional literacy, The Intermet
res its users to have the abilities to use, find, create, and share content that
9 life 0
+ Taxation
gadgets and subscription to services.
signific
taxes on Internet: services will
barrier to a widespread
areas where infrast
lack of awareness and
In
requil
will be serviceable to on
srnet resources are
(ouce:imahonho
pbocm/ phos eng
hones horde me 149009
The mojo canted or
Internet an English which
‘ot he priory ongvoge §
‘mony people od thereby |
‘ccenaly ond viene* Local Content — Localizing content in a platform Uist is mamively
Scope is a big challenge. The majority of eo
nt on the Internet isin fy
which
4
1 not the primary language for many people, thereby lieing «ath
bity anew truly relent
mint be geared toward the local popuintion and rat aq
the particularity of their cultiron and their lived! worlds (GSMA 2014). le
Tn 2019, the government of New Zenland through the project Digital tng
haeprin, tanned 0 ning tor ttt
eon
ting he ert
OF accede opportunitie, end
o engage with the digital wore bj
having linited acces tothe Internet, digital devies, services,
content hat moet their expresed neds, and ae able to cone tinge
they can live a life where they can work, learn, and have fun
+ Skills having very litle know-how to use the Internet and digital
+ Trust ~ having very little trust in the Internet. and online services, of
digital tools
news of the content, For the Internet
ultures, conte
the barriers to digital inclusion by
iments: motivation, access, skills, and trust
+ Motivation — Inck of appreciation
digital technology can help ts connect
quently having meaningful purpose
+ Access
‘thi
While the four elements demonstrate the complex nature of digital inclusion, g
an also be the conceptual tools by which managers, school administrators,
officials, and policy makers can use to encourage
technologies.
the broad citizenry to tap into i¢y
Motivation can be pursued by providing digital literacy courses, unde
how digital technology can improve lives, accelerate learning, and enable 4.
performance of duties.
* Access is broad and covers three aspects—affordability, availability, ap
connectivity.
Skills can only be acquired if the institutions—schools, corporations, organs
tions in the public and private sector—will create programs and. projects fe
skills upgrading and capacity-building and will institutionalize the bodies tat
discharge such functions,
* Trust can be generated if the constituents see results and if tr
accountability
whe
bs
problem, b
‘Assuch, th
processes,
tation post
Alongsi
also launel
the longst
Bridgit
present ae
as in the
such as it
marginali
terms of |that in massively global jg
scope is « big ci nnguage for mA ‘o be truly relevant to al
rltures and the project Digital Inclusion
icaarty of their €
ee ty naming four interdepen.
f New Zealand throus
a urs to digital ine
‘ a skills, and trust.
f elements: motivation, ces fing on how the Internet and
stand
and conse:
ec vgage with the digital world
a devi, eros, softwar,
‘+ Motivation ~ lack of
ligital technology can help us
‘quently having a meaningful purpose 0