CH
HA
A PP TT EE R
R
C
6
Decision-Making
Processes
Stewart L. Tubbs
McGraw-Hill
2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Slide 2
Decision-Making Processes
McGraw-Hill
Improving Creativity
Reflective Thinking Process
The Kepner-Tregoe Approach
The Fishbone Technique
Brainstorming
Six Thinking Hats
Incrementation
Mixed Scanning
Tacit Bargaining
2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights
Slide 3
Improving Creativity
Creative thinking is often characterized as
thinking outside the box.
Creativity can be divided into two phases of
thinking:
Divergent thinking
Convergent thinking
McGraw-Hill
2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights
Slide 4
Improving Creativity
Gibson and Hodgetts (1986) identify four
different kinds of creativity that may be
applied to group problem solving.
McGraw-Hill
Innovation
Synthesis
Extension
Duplication
2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights
Slide 5
Improving Creativity
Left- and Right-Brain Functions
McGraw-Hill
2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights
Slide 6
Creative Decision-Making
Model of Decision-Making
Source: Reprinted with permission of the Free Press, a Division of Macmillan, Inc., from
McGraw-Hill David Braybrooke and Charles C. Lindbloom.
2009
McGraw-Hill
Companies,
[Link]
rights
A The
Strategy
of Decision,
copyright
1963
by
Slide 7
Reflective Thinking Process
The reflective thinking process Dewey
(1910) emphasizes the left-brain functions.
McGraw-Hill
Define problem.
Analyze causes.
Identify criteria.
Generate solutions.
Choose best solution.
Implement solution.
2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights
Slide 8
The Kepner-Tregoe Approach
The Kepner-Tregoe approach involves
identifying wants and musts.
The most important contribution seems to be the
way in which a group works through the criteria
phase.
McGraw-Hill
2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights
Slide 9
Fishbone Technique
SSC Ratings for Competing States
McGraw-Hill
Source: From Mike Magner. Geology Blamed for
2009
Theof
McGraw-Hill
Companies,
Inc. News,
All rights
States
Loss
Atom Smasher,
Ann Arbor
11
Slide 10
The Fishbone Technique
The Fishbone Technique is so called
because its outline resembles the skeleton of
a fish.
It helps to identify graphically the underlying
causes of a problem.
McGraw-Hill
2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights
Slide 11
Brainstorming
Brainstorming is a lateral thinking process.
Brainstorming encourages open and random
thinking and communications
McGraw-Hill
2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights
Slide 12
Brainstorming
Brainstorming emphasizes right-brain
activity.
Rules for brainstorming:
McGraw-Hill
Put judgment and evaluation aside temporarily.
Turn imagination loose, and start offering the results.
Think of as many ideas as you can.
Seek combination and improvement.
Record all ideas in full view.
Evaluate at a later session.
2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights
Slide 13
Brainstorming
Alternative Brainstorming Techniques
Random Input
Reframing
Professions approach
Provocation
McGraw-Hill
2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights
Slide 14
Brainstorming
Alternative Brainstorming Techniques
SCAMPER system
S=substitute
C=combine
A=adapt
M=modify
P=put to another use
E=eliminate
R=reverse
McGraw-Hill
2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights
Slide 15
Six Thinking Hats
Six thinking hats is an intuitive way to keep your thoughts
focused while problem solving.
1. White hatemotionally neutral.
2. Red hatemotions, gut instincts, intuition, and feelings.
3. Black hatrepresents careful and analytical thinking.
4. Yellow hatrepresents sunny, optimistic, and positive
thinking.
5. Green hatrepresents creativity, new ideas, alternatives,
and possibilities.
6. Blue hatrepresents coordination, control, and the
discipline to know when to use which hat.
McGraw-Hill
2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights
Slide 16
Incrementalism
Braybrooke and Lindblom (1963) argue that
many governmental policies are adopted
partially as a result of adapting to political
pressure rather than as a result of rational
analysis.
McGraw-Hill
2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights
Slide 17
Incrementalism
The term incrementalism refers to the
process of making decisions that result in
change.
Quadrant 1High understanding/large change
Quadrant 2High understanding/incremental
change
Quadrant 3Low understanding/incremental
change
Quadrant 4Low understanding/large change
McGraw-Hill
2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights
Slide 18
Mixed Scanning
Etzioni (1968) offers a decision-making
strategy that is a combination of reflective
thinking and incrementalism.
The ability to maintain a balance between
attention to the general and attention to the
specific appears to be a major factor in
successful problem solving.
McGraw-Hill
2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights
Slide 19
Tacit Bargaining
Murnighan (1992) refer to tacit bargaining
as bargaining in which communication is
incomplete or impossible.
People can cooperate fairly successfully in some
problem-solving situations if it is to their
advantage to do so.
Mixed-motive situationswhen there is
simultaneous pressure to cooperate and to compete
imply communication procedures that are distinctly
different from those in other problem-solving
situations.
McGraw-Hill
2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights
Slide 20
Virtual decision-making
The decision-making process in the virtual process is
a thoughtful and time-consuming process.
Online tools that help groups make decisions are
called decision support systems (DSS).
McGraw-Hill
2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights
Slide 21
Review of the Systems Approach
The decision-making process in most groups
can be improved.
The systems principle of equifinality is that
several alternative methods may be used to
reach the solution to the groups problem.
The appropriateness of any method will
depend on the demands of the specific
situation.
McGraw-Hill
2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights
Slide 22
Review of the Systems Approach
Rational problem-solving methods work
well but seem most suited to an autonomous
group trying to satisfy its own needs with a
democratic leader.
Tacit bargaining seems to be primarily
appropriate in mixed-motive situations.
The demands of the situation play a great
part in suggesting which problem-solving
strategy we want to employ.
McGraw-Hill
2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights
