Market Structures and Equilibrium Analysis
Topics covered
Market Structures and Equilibrium Analysis
Topics covered
We nurture talent
MArkets
Sonia Singh
2
What is market ?
$5 $5 d
D
Bushels of Bushels of
0 1,200,000 wheat per day 0 5 10 15 wheat per day
•The firm maximizes economic profit by finding
the rate of output at which total revenue exceeds
total cost by the greatest amount
SA SB SC SASBSC S
Price per unit
p p p p
0 10 20 0 10 20 0 10 20 0 30 60
Quantity per period Quantity per period Quantity per period Quantity per period
ATC
AVC
$5 d $5
Profit
4
D
•If there are 100,000 identical wheat farmers, their individual supply curves are summed horizontally
to yield the market supply curve, panel b, where market price of $5 is determined.
•At this price, each farmer produces 12 bushels per day, as in panel a, for a total quantity supplied of
1,200,000 bushels per day
•Each farmer earns an economic profit of $12 per day as shown by the shaded rectangle.
Monopoly
Monopoly is a well defined market structure where there is
only one seller who controls the entire market supply, as
there are no close substitutes for that product.
Features of monopoly
- Monopolist is the single producer of the product in the
market
- under monopoly firm and industry are identical
- No close competitive substitutes
- It’s a complete negation of competition
- A monopolist is a price maker and not a price taker.
Bases of monopoly
- Natural factors
- Control of raw material
- Legal restrictions
- Economies of large scale production
- Business Reputation
- Business combines
Types of monopoly
- Pure & Imperfect Monopoly
- Legal monopoly
- Natural monopoly
- Technological monopoly
- Joint monopoly
- Simple & discriminating monopoly
- Public & private monopoly
Monopoly Equilibrium
The monopolist can control both price and supply of the product. But
at any point of time she can fix only one of them. Either she can fix
the quantity of output and let the market demand determine the price
of the product; or she can fix the price of the product and let the
market demand determine the quantity which she can sell at the given
price.
Having profit maximising objective, she adopts the rationale of
equating MC with MR and fixes the level of output which gives her
the maximum profits or where the losses are minimum. Thus when
equilibrium output is decided, the price is automatically determined in
relation to the demand for the product.
A monopolist may be earning profits or incur losses in
the short run.
Features of Monopoly price
- It is not the highest possible price.
- This price does not bring the highest average profit to the seller
- Monopoly price is often associated with the output, the AC of which
is still falling.
- Under perfect competition, the price charged is equal to MC but in
monopoly the price is above MC.
Price discrimination
Price discrimination implies the act of selling the output of the same
product at different prices in different markets or to different buyers.
Types of price discrimination
- Personal discrimination
- Age discrimination
- Sex discrimination
- Locational or territorial discrimination
- Size discrimination
- Use discrimination
- Time discrimination
Objectives of price discrimination
- To maximise the profits.
- To convert the consumers’ surplus into producer’s profit.
- To capture new markets.
- To keep hold on export markets.
- To exploit the unutilised capacity by widening the size of
market through price discrimination.
- To clear off surplus stock.
- To augment future sales by quoting lower rates at present to the
potential buyers who may develop the taste for the product in
future.
- To weed out the potential competition from the market or
destroy a rival firm.
Conditions necessary for price discrimination
- Separate markets
- Apparent product differentiation
- Prevention of re-exchange of goods
- Non-transferability nature of product
- Let go attitude of buyers
- Legal sanctions
- Buyer’s illusion
When price discrimination is profitable?
Even though circumstances are favourable to practice price discrimination, it
may not always be profitable. It is profitable only when the following two
conditions are prevailing.
- Elasticity of demand differs in each market
- The cost-differential of supplying output to different markets should not be
large in relation to the price differential based on elasticity differential.
• The monopolist’s demand curve
– downward sloping
– MR below AR
MC
ATC
P*
MR AR
Q
Q*
• Disadvantages of monopoly
– high prices / low output: short run
– high prices / low output: long run
– lack of incentive to innovate
• Advantages of monopoly
– economies of scale
– profits can be used for investment
Monopolistic Competition
“
Monopolistic competition is defined as a market setting in
which a large number of sellers sell differentiated
products”
“ Monopolistic competition is a market situation in which
there is keen competition, but neither perfect nor pure,
among a group of large number of small producers or
suppliers having some degree of monopoly power
because of their differential products” – Prof. E.H.
Chamberlin
Main Features
• In Monopolistic
Competition, multiple
Monopolies co-exist
while producing Goods
that are similar enough
to readily act as
Substitutes for each
other.
SimilarProducts
• In Monopolistic Competition,
the products available in the
Market must be Similar, but
not Identical.
• This allows the Consumer to
select the Good best suited to
their tastes and needs at Prices
comparable to their
Substitutes.
LimitedPriceControl
• In Monopolistic
Competition, Producers
have limited control
over the Prices that they
can charge because
Consumers have a
number of alternatives
readily available to
them.
DifferentiatedProducts
• In Monopolistic
Competition, Producers must
act to separate their good
from those offered by their
competitors.
• They do this by creating both
perceived and actual
differences between their
products to make them more
desirable to select
Consumers.
Price and output determination under monopolistic competition
£0.60
MR D (AR)
Q1
Output / Sales
Monopolistically Competitive
Firm in the Long Run
MC This is the long run
Cost/Revenue
equilibrium position of a
firm in monopolistic
competition.
AC
AR = AC
AR1
MR1
Q2 Output / Sales
• Short run
– Downward sloping demand – differentiated
product
– Demand is relatively elastic – good substitutes
– MR < P
– Profits are maximized when MR = MC
– This firm is making economic profits
• Long run
– Profits will attract new firms to the industry (no
barriers to entry)
– The old firm’s demand will decrease to DLR
– Firm’s output and price will fall
– Industry output will rise
– No profit (P = AC)
Oligopoly
Market structure that is dominated by just a
few firms
MC1
P* MC2
b AR
Q
Q*
MR
• For any MC between a and b, the profit maximizing price and
output remain unchanged
In monopolistic competition, non-price competition is crucial for firms to distinguish their products through differentiation, such as branding, quality, or customer service. This differentiation reduces direct price competition and stimulates brand loyalty. Consequently, firms can achieve higher profitability due to perceived differences, even though products may be similar. Non-price competition can lead to increased selling costs, such as advertising or promotional expenses, which are necessary to maintain market share and profitability. Successful product differentiation allows firms to operate with some monopoly power, enabling them to set prices above marginal cost .
In the short run, firms in a monopolistic competition may earn economic profits due to product differentiation and lack of immediate competition. They produce where marginal revenue equals marginal cost. However, in the long run, economic profits attract new firms, reducing individual firm's demand. Consequently, as market conditions normalize and firms' demand curves become more elastic, any short-run profits erode. Ultimately, firms operate at a point where average revenue equals average cost, resulting in zero economic profit, indicative of long-run equilibrium in such a competitive landscape .
Market classification provides a framework to understand the variety and characteristics of markets by segmenting them based on different criteria. The primary bases for market classification include geographical area (local, regional, national, international), nature of transactions (spot market, future market), volume of business (wholesale, retail), time period (very short, short, long), status of sellers (primary, secondary, terminal), regulations (regulated and unregulated), and competition (pure, perfect, monopoly, oligopoly, monopolistic). This classification aids in analyzing the market structure, competition levels, and potential entry strategies .
Oligopolistic markets are characterized by a small number of firms whose strategic decisions are highly interdependent. Each firm's actions, such as pricing, output level, or marketing strategies, can significantly influence the market dynamics and the strategies of competitors. This interdependence can lead firms to engage in tacit or explicit collusion, where firms might collaborate to set prices or output levels akin to a monopolist, resulting in higher joint profits. However, collusion is illegal in many jurisdictions. Firms may also compete intensely, leading to price wars or innovations. The uncertain environment and potential for collusion reflect the complexity and strategic depth of oligopoly markets .
The kinked demand curve model suggests that an oligopolistic firm faces a demand curve with two segments: relatively elastic above the current price and relatively inelastic below it. If a firm raises its price, it is assumed that competitors will not follow, causing a loss in market share, making the demand elastic. If the firm lowers its price, competitors are expected to follow, making demand inelastic. This asymmetric response creates a 'kink' and leads to price rigidity, as firms have little incentive to change prices since potential gains from price changes are small due to competitive reactions, resulting in stable prices and outputs even with cost fluctuations .
Price leadership in oligopolistic markets involves a dominant firm setting the price that other firms in the industry follow, which leads to mimicked pricing behavior without explicit communication. Unlike formal collusion, which requires coordinated agreements to manipulate prices or output, price leadership is an informal form of tacit collusion, where smaller firms adjust their prices to align with the leader, reducing price competition and maintaining market stability. Though less explicit than formal collusion, price leadership can still facilitate collusive outcomes without overtly violating competitive laws .
In a monopolistic market, the monopolist maximizes profit by equating marginal cost (MC) with marginal revenue (MR), a condition that determines the profit-maximizing output level. The monopolist enjoys control over the market supply and can influence the price, setting either the price or the output level. However, only one can be fixed at any time. By determining the output, the monopolist lets market demand set the price, or by setting the price, the market demand determines the quantity sold. This enables the monopolist to achieve the highest possible profit or the least possible loss .
Barriers to entry significantly influence market power and competition in monopolistic and oligopolistic markets by deterring new competitors. In a monopolistic market, barriers like patents, control over essential inputs, or significant economies of scale allow the monopolist to maintain high levels of market control and profitability, effectively eliminating competition. Similarly, in oligopolies, barriers such as high start-up costs or established brand loyalty enforce dominance by a few firms and sustain their competitive advantage, thus perpetuating limited competition and stable market power among existing players. These barriers ensure market entrants find it challenging to compete effectively .
Cartel formation in an oligopolistic market is fraught with challenges such as aligning interests of diverse firms and maintaining coordination over time. The main difficulties include enforcing agreed-upon pricing or output levels and preventing cheating, as individual firms might gain by undercutting the cartel price. The entry of new competitors attracted by the high prices set by the cartel further destabilizes its operations. While a cartel can initially enhance market stability by reducing price competition, long-term sustainability is compromised by legal repercussions and internal instability due to potential for individual firms to defect for short-term gains .
In a perfectly competitive market, market equilibrium is determined by the intersection of the market demand and supply curves, establishing the market price. The firm, being a price taker, accepts this market price. The firm’s demand curve is perfectly elastic, reflecting that it can sell any amount of output at this market price but cannot influence the price itself. The firm maximizes profit by adjusting its output level so that marginal cost equals marginal revenue, which equals the market price. Therefore, this ensures that firms operate where they earn the highest possible profits or minimize losses .