Intercultural Differences in the Global Workplace
Presented by:
Prof. Youcef Hdouch
Ibn Tofail University
yhdouch@[Link]
Riddle 1
Culture X
Death of a relative is an event that
business associates are expected to view
as significant to the family members;
Culture Y
This is a private affair, but something that
should not affect work.
Riddle 2
Why doesnt McDonalds sell
hamburgers in India?
Outline
I. Culture: Definition
[Link] of Cultures: Low /HighContext
III. High vs. Low Context Communication
IV. Forms of Verbal Interactions
V. Verbal Communication Styles and Cultural Types
VI. Areas of Nonverbal Communication
VII. Why is Cross-Cultural Communication important?
VIII. Examples of Intercultural Communication:
Negotiation
A-Negotiators from polychronic cultures
B- Negotiators from monochronic cultures
C-Dimensions of difference across national cultures
D-Cross-cultural Negotiations: U.S vs. Nigeria
IX. Conclusion
I. Culture : Definition
. It is the software of the mind. It is
what enables us to process information in
various specific applications.
It is the collective programming of the mind
which distinguishes the members of one
group or category of people from another.
Hofstede
(1993)
It is "the coherent, learned, shared
view of a group of people about lifes
concerns that ranks what is important,
furnishes attitudes about what things
are
appropriate,
and
dictates
behavior".
Beamer and Varner
(2001, 13)
Dos and Don'ts
Never refuse the offer of coffee from a
businessman in Kuwait.
Be very careful not to cross your legs so that the
sole of your shoes points to someone from
Thailand.
Never help yourself to food when you are the
guest of honour at a banquet in China.
Do not discuss politics in Nigeria.
Do not offer your host gifts for his wife or children
when doing business in Saudi Arabia.
Plan to spend 2 hours on lunch in France.
II- Types of Cultures: Low-Context
and High-Context
Japanese
Arab
African
Korean
Chinese
Adapted from Hall (1976)
Greek Spanish
Italian
English
North American
Swiss
German
Edward T. Hall's Model
High-context
cultures
Long-lasting
relationships
Exploiting context
Spoken
agreements
Insiders and
outsiders clearly
distinguished
Low-context cultures
Shorter relationships
Less dependent on
context
Written agreements
Insiders and outsiders
less clearly
distinguished
Cultural patterns
change faster
Cultural Classification-Hall
Low-Context Cultures - What Is Said Is
More Important Than How or Where It
Is Said.
U.S.
Germany
High-Context cultures - What Is Said
and How or Where It is Said Are
Significant.
Asia
Latin America
Middle East
Sub-saharan Africa
Low-context in business
Business
before
friendship
Credibility through
expertise & performance
Agreements by legal
contract
Negotiations efficient
High-context in business
No
business without
friendship
Credibility through
relationships
Agreements founded
on trust
Negotiations slow &
ritualistic
III- High vs Low Context
Communication
High context: The sender does not encode
large amounts of information.
Communication is implicit. The most crucial
information is internalized in the receiver or is
in the context. Ex: Best Friends, twins
Low Context: Information is explicit. The
receiver does not have to read into anything in
order to understand the intended message. Ex:
lawyers
IV- Forms of Verbal Interaction
Repartee - Conversation in
which parties take turns
speaking/listening for short
periods. (US, British)
Verbal dueling - Like
gamesmanship; purpose is to
see who can gain dominance in
a friendly debate. (Russia)
Intercultural Business
Communication, 4th ed.,
Chaney & Martin
Ritual conversation - Involves
standard replies and comments
for a given situation.
Self-disclosure - Form of
interaction which involves telling
other people about you so they
may get to know you better.
Intercultural Business
Communication, 4th ed.,
Chaney & Martin
V- Verbal Communication Styles
Direct style
Indirect style
Instrumental style
Affective style
Exacting style
Elaborate style
Succinct style
Person-centered
style
Role-centered style
Direct Vs. Indirect
Direct: Blunt, say exactly what they mean,
honesty motivated
Indirect: beating around the bush, do not
say exactly what they mean; to maintain
relationships, face saving is a major
benefit.
Instrumental Vs. Affective
Instrumental: Focus is on the sender and
the task/goal at hand; want to accomplish a
personal goal.
Affective: Equal focus on the listener, more
concerned with entire process/interaction;
think holistically and about the relationship
Exacting, Elaborative, or Succinct
Exacting: Does not use more or less language
than is needed; honest and to the point
Elaborative: Rich, expressive language (can
seem wordy or dramatic to others), use
metaphors and similes.
Succinct: deliberately give a small amount of
information, understatement, silence,
especially used in anxiety ridden situations
Person vs. Role centered
Person Centered: Frequently use first
person pronouns, downplay the differences
between people, informal.
Role Centered: Formal, the status of the
speakers is taken into account, use
honorifics, use formal titles.
VI. Areas of Nonverbal
Communication
Chronemics (time)
Proxemics (space)
Oculesics (gaze/eye contact)
Olfactics (smell)
Haptics (touch)
Kinesics (body language)
Chromatics (color)
Silence
Intercultural Business
Communication, 4th ed.,
Chaney & Martin
Time (Chronemics)
Attitudes toward time vary from
culture to culture.
Countries that follow monochronic
time perform only one major
activity at a time (U.S., England,
Switzerland, Germany).
Countries that follow polychronic
time work on several activities
simultaneously (Latin America, the
Mediterranean, the Arabs, Africans).
Intercultural Business
Communication, 4th ed.,
Chaney & Martin
Cultural Differences in
Attitudes Toward Time
U.S. persons are very time conscious
and value punctuality.
Tardiness also conveys that the person
is not well organized.
Germans and Swiss people are even
more time conscious.
In Africa, punctuality is not widely
regarded.
Intercultural Business
Communication, 4th ed.,
Chaney & Martin
Space (proxemics)
High context
* Executive offices
shared and open to
all
* May have several
people in their office
at one time
* Stand close to each
other in business
conversations and
may be offended if
someone moves
away
Low context
* Executive offices
separated and access
controlled
* Expect to meet with
one person alone and
not have others
lingering about
* Set boundaries and
will be uncomfortable
if someone moves too
close
VII- Why is Cross-Cultural
Communication important ?
Globalization: Cross border movement of people, goods and data
brings more and more cultures into contact with one another and
increases the potential of cross culture communication.
Business Opportunities
Job Opportunities
Improves the contribution of employees in a diverse
workforce
Sharing of views and ideas
Talent improvisation
An understanding of diverse market
Increased Selfawareness
One of the most important reasons
for studying intercultural
communication is that it increases
our awareness of our own culture
our cultural identity and cultural
background. And it helps us avoid
ethnocentrism.
Ethnocentrism
is a tendency to
think our own culture is superior to
Creative Problem
Solving
According
to creativity research, we learn more from
people who are different than us than from those who
are similar to us.
(Sternberg, 1999 as cited in Ting-Toomey &Chung, 2005)
Small
group research suggests the quality of ideas
produced in ethnically diverse groups have significantly
higher outcomes than ethnically homogeneous groups.
This is due to the synergistic perspective.
Synergistic
perspective means combining the best
of all cultural approaches in solving a workplace
problem.
Examples of Intercultural Communication: Negotiation
A-Negotiators from polychronic cultures tend
to
start and end meetings at flexible times,
take breaks when it seems appropriate,
be comfortable with a high flow of
information,
expect to read each others' thoughts and
minds,
sometimes overlap talk,
past-oriented
B-Negotiators from monochronic cultures tend to
prefer prompt beginnings and endings,
schedule breaks; oriented to the present and the nearfuture
deal with one agenda item at a time,
rely on specific, detailed, and explicit
communication,
prefer to talk in sequence,
view lateness as devaluing or evidence of lack of
respect.
C-Dimensions of difference across national
cultures
1-Power Distance
2- Uncertainty avoidance
3-Individualism vs. collectivism
4-Masculinity vs. Feminism
Power Distance
Orientation towards
authority
High
Low
Malaysia
Arab Countries,
Sub-Saharan Africa
Mexico
India
France
Italy
Japan
Spain
Argentina
US
Germany
UK
Denmark
36
Power Distance
High
hierarchical structures,
clear authority figures, and
the right to use power with
discretion
Low
democratic structures and flat organizational
hierarchies,
shared authority,
the right to use power only in limited
circumstances and for legitimate purposes
Uncertainty Avoidance
Weak uncertainty
avoidance
-Uncertainty: normal feature
of life and each day is
accepted as it comes
-Low stress subjective
feeling of well-being
-Aggression and emotions
must not be shown
-Comfortable in ambiguous
situations and with unfamiliar
risk
-There should not be more
rules than necessary
-Precision and punctuality
have to be learned
-Tolerance to innovation
-Motivation by achievement
Strong uncertainty avoidance
-Uncertainty: A continuous
threat that must be fought.
High stress subjective
feeling of anxiety
-Aggression and emotions
may be shown at proper
times
-Fear of ambiguous
situations and of unfamiliar
risk
-Emotional need for rules,
even if they never work
-Precision and punctuality
come naturally
-Resistance to innovation
-Motivation by security
38
Uncertainty Avoidance
Desire for
stability
High
Low
Greece
Japan
France
Korea
Arab Countries
Sub-saharan
Africa
Germany
Australia
Canada
US
UK
India
Denmark
Singapore
39
Individualism
Low individualism
High individualism
Individuals learn to think in
terms of we
Individuals learn to think in
terms of I
High-context communication
Low-context communication
Diplomas provide entry to
higher status groups
Diplomas increase
economic worth and/or selfrespect
Relationship employeremployee is perceived in
moral terms, like a family
Hiring and promotion
decisions take employees in
group into account
Management is
management of groups
Relationship prevails over
task
Relationship employeremployee is a contract
based on mutual advantage
Hiring and promotion are
supposed to be based on
skills and rules only
Management is
management of individuals
Task prevails over
relationship
40
Individualism
Hig
h
Australia
US
UK
Canada
France
Germany
Spain
Japan
Mexico
Italy
Korea
Singapore
Lo
w
41
Masculinity
Low masculinity
High
masculinity
Dominant values: caring
for others and
preservation
Dominant values: material
success and progress
People and warm
relationships are important
Money and things are
important
Sympathy for the weak
Sympathy for the strong
In family, both fathers and
mothers deal with facts and
feelings
In family, fathers deal with
facts and mothers with
feelings
Stress on equality, solidarity
, and quality of work life
Stress on equity,
competition among
colleagues and
performance
Managers use intuition and
strive for consensus
Resolution of conflicts by
compromise and negotiation
Managers are expected to
be decisive and assertive
Resolution of conflicts by
42
Masculinity
High
Japan
Mexico
Germany
UK
US
Arabia
France
Korea
Portugal
Denmark
Sweden
Lo
w
43
D-Cross-cultural
Negotiations
U.S. Approaches to Negotiation
U.S. negotiators: individualist values,
imagining self and other as autonomous.
Independent initiative may be taken.
African Approaches to Negotiation
Negotiation happens within social
networks, following prescribed roles.
relationships and hierarchies tend to be
emphasized;
Distributive negotiation: A win-lose
perspective;
May deal with different issues at the same
time;
See things universally -- i.e., they like to
talk about broad applications of ideas;
Concentrate on one problem at a time;
Focus on areas of disagreement, not areas
of commonality or agreement;
Like closure and certainty rather than
open-endedness or fuzziness.
Focus on areas of agreement, not areas of
disagreement;
MODEL OF CULTURES EFFECT ON NEGOTIATING
STRATEGY
Dimension
Negotiators Profile
Basic Concept of
Negotiations
Distributive or Integrative
Most Significant Type of
Issue
Task or Relationship
Selection of Negotiators
Abilities or Status
Influence of Individual
Aspirations
Individualist or Collectivist
Internal Decision-Making
Process
Independent or Majority
Rule
Orientation Toward
Risk-Taking Propensity
Risk-Averse or Risk-Tolerant
Speed of Trust
Fast Trust or Slow Trust
Concern with Protocol
Formal or Informal
Style of Communication
Low-Context or HighContext
Nature on
of Persuasion
or Metcalf et al.
Based
Weiss and Stripp Factual-Inductive
(1985, 1998) and
Affective
(2008).
The Nigerian Negotiators Profile and Implications
for Europeans
See Handout 1
Practice: See handout 2
Conclusion
A Traveler to Distant Places Should Make No Enemies.
Samuel A.
Spralls III
Prof. Geert Hofstede
Culture is more often a source of conflict than of synergy.
Cultural differences are a nuisance at best and often a
disaster.
47