0% found this document useful (0 votes)
412 views55 pages

Understanding Bloom's Taxonomy Levels

The document discusses Bloom's Taxonomy of the Cognitive Domain, which defines six levels of cognition - Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. It also discusses the Affective Domain involving emotions/attitudes and the Psychomotor Domain involving physical skills. Bloom's Taxonomy is used to write instructional objectives targeting different cognitive levels for various subjects. The levels progress from basic recall/knowledge to more complex critical thinking skills.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
412 views55 pages

Understanding Bloom's Taxonomy Levels

The document discusses Bloom's Taxonomy of the Cognitive Domain, which defines six levels of cognition - Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. It also discusses the Affective Domain involving emotions/attitudes and the Psychomotor Domain involving physical skills. Bloom's Taxonomy is used to write instructional objectives targeting different cognitive levels for various subjects. The levels progress from basic recall/knowledge to more complex critical thinking skills.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Educational Psychology

….Name and define the six levels in


Bloom's Taxonomy for the Cognitive
Domain ....

Developed by W. Huitt (1998)


Writing Instructional Objectives

Instructional objectives, including behavioral


objectives, can be written for any of the domains
of instruction
• Cognitive
• Affective
• Psychomotor
The Cognitive Domain

Bloom's Taxonomy of the Cognitive Domain


(started in 1948 and completed in 1956) was one
of the most influential statements about levels of
knowing.
The official title of the book is Taxonomy of
educational objectives: The classification of
educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive
domain with the text having 4 other authors
(M. Englehart, E. Furst, W. Hill, and D
Krathwohl).
The Cognitive Domain

The major idea of the taxonomy is that what


educators want students to know (and,
therefore, statements of educational objectives)
can be arranged in a hierarchy from less to
more complex.

The taxonomy contains six levels, with


sublevels identified for each.
Cognitive Learning

 The mental or intellectual thinking


behaviors demonstrated by an
individual
The Cognitive Domain

A mnemonic device for remembering the six


levels:

K Knowledge
C Comprehension
A Application
A Analysis
S Synthesis
E Evaluation
The Cognitive Domain

Student recalls or
recognizes information,
Knowledge
ideas, and principles in the
approximate form in which
they were learned.
The Cognitive Domain

Write
List
Knowledge
Label
Name
State
Define
The Cognitive Domain

The student will define the 6


Knowledge levels of Bloom's taxonomy
of the cognitive domain.
The Cognitive Domain

Student translates,
Comprehension comprehends, or interprets
information based on prior
learning.
The Cognitive Domain

Explain
Summarize
Comprehension Paraphrase
Describe
Illustrate
The Cognitive Domain

The student will explain


Comprehension the purpose of Bloom's
taxonomy of the cognitive
domain.
The Cognitive Domain

Student selects, transfers,


Application and uses data and
principles to complete a
problem or task with a
minimum of direction.
The Cognitive Domain

Use
Compute
Application Solve
Demonstrate
Apply
Construct
The Cognitive Domain

The student will write an


Application instructional objective for
each level of Bloom's
taxonomy.
The Cognitive Domain

Student distinguishes,
classifies, and relates the
Analysis assumptions, hypotheses,
evidence, or structure of a
statement or question.
The Cognitive Domain

Analyze
Categorize
Analysis Compare
Contrast
Separate
The Cognitive Domain

The student will compare


Analysis and contrast the cognitive
and affective domains.
The Cognitive Domain

Student originates,
integrates, and combines
Synthesis
ideas into a product, plan
or proposal that is new to
him or her.
The Cognitive Domain

Create
Design
Synthesis Hypothesize
Invent
Develop
The Cognitive Domain

The student will design a


classification scheme for
Synthesis writing educational
objectives that combines
the cognitive, affective, and
psychomotor domains.
The Cognitive Domain

Student appraises,
Evaluation assesses, or critiques on a
basis of specific standards
and criteria.
The Cognitive Domain

Judge
Evaluation Recommend
Critique
Justify
The Cognitive Domain

The student will judge the


Evaluation effectiveness of writing
objectives using Bloom's
taxonomy.
The Cognitive Domain

In general, research over the last 40 years has


confirmed the taxonomy as a hierarchy with the
exception of the last two levels.

It is uncertain at this time whether synthesis


and evaluation should be reversed (i.e.,
evaluation is less difficult to accomplish than
synthesis) or whether synthesis and evaluation
are at the same level of difficulty but use
different cognitive processes.
The Cognitive Domain

I believe the latter is more likely as it relates to the


differences between creative and critical thinking.

Creative Thinking Critical Thinking


Synthesis Evaluation

Analysis
Application
Comprehension

Knowledge
Affective Learning

 An individual’s emotions, attitudes,


appreciations, interests, and/or
values about “something” or
someone
Affective Behaviors are indicated
by attitudes of . . .
 Awareness

 Caring

 Interest

 Attention

 Concern

 Responsibility
The Affective Domain

Being aware of or attending to


Receiving
something in the environment

Showing some new behaviors as


Responding
a result of experience

Showing some definite


Valuing
involvement or commitment

Krathwohl, D., Bloom, B., & Masia, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives.
Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David McKay.
The Affective Domain

Integrating a new value into


Organization one's general set of values,
giving it some ranking among
one's general priorities.

Characterization Acting consistently with the new


by Value value; person is known by the
value.
Psychomotor Learning

 Physical activities involving gross


and/or fine motor skills, such as
coordination, dexterity, strength,
manipulation, and speed
Psychomotor Learning

 Behaviors displayed when using


machinery and equipment or
precision tools indicate
psychomotor learning.
Psychomotor Behaviors are
demonstrated by students
when they . . .

 Use

 Handle/Manipulate

 Operate

 Build/Construct

 Differentiate (by touch)

 Perform skills & tasks


Three Domains of Learning

 Cognitive Domain
 “Thinking”

 Affective Domain
 “Feeling”

 Psychomotor Domain
 “Doing”
The Psychomotor Domain
Process of becoming aware of
Perception objects, qualities, etc by way of
senses. Basic in situation-
interpretation-action chain
leading to motor activity.

Readiness for a particular kind


Set
of action or experience; may be
mental, physical or emotional.

Simpson, J. S. (1966). The classification of educational objectives, psychomotor


domain. Office of Education Project No. 5-85-104. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
The Psychomotor Domain

Overt behavioral act under


Guided guidance of an instructor, or
Response following model or set criteria.

Learned response becomes


Mechanism habitual; learner has achieved
certain confidence and
proficiency or performance.
The Psychomotor Domain

Complex Performance of motor act


Overt considered complex because of
Response movement pattern required.

Adaptation Altering motor activities to


meet demands of problematic
situations.
The Psychomotor Domain

Creating new motor acts or


ways of manipulating
Origination materials out of skills, abilities
and understandings developed
in the psychomotor area.
Writing Instructional Objectives

While it is possible to write instructional


objectives of all types for each of the three
domains, the vast majority are written for
the cognitive domain.

The major exceptions include preschool,


physical education, and perhaps fine arts
courses such as sculpturing and drama.
Bloom’s Taxonomy

 A hierarchical
classification of
six levels of
cognition or
thinking behaviors
Levels of Cognition = Thinking
Behaviors or Skills

 Higher-Order Thinking Skills


(HOTS) 4

 Lower-Order Thinking Skills


(LOTS) 2
Lower-Order Thinking Skills

 The simplest or most “basic” forms of


cognition . . .

 Comprehension (understanding)

 Knowledge (knowing or remembering)


Knowing or Knowledge

 The “lowest” or most fundamental level of


cognition (thinking)

 Remembering or recalling information,


facts, data, etc.

 However, the individual may not


understand, or be able to use the
knowledge correctly
Comprehension

 The second level of cognition

 “Understanding” what is known or


remembered

 But the individual may not be able to


apply or use his (her) understanding
properly or consistently
Higher-Order Thinking Skills

 Involve
increasingly
more complex
levels of
cognition
Higher-Order Thinking Skills
include four thinking behaviors . . .

 Evaluation

 Synthesis

 Analysis

 Application
Application

 “Applying” one’s learning to a given


circumstance or situation

 “Doing” something with what is known


and understood
Analysis

 Analyzing and interpreting data,


information, and facts to identify
relationships, trends, and
“connections”

 This level of cognition is the “gateway” or


beginning of problem solving
Synthesis
 “Connecting” related, and sometimes
unrelated, ideas, principles, and
concepts to form a coherent whole

 Understanding that often the significance


of the “whole” may be greater than
the sum of its parts

 Frequently, the ability to synthesize is


essential for arriving at solutions
correctly
Evaluation

 Determining the “value” or “worth” of an


idea, concept, or practice with
consistency and accuracy

 “Weighing” the merit of multiple solutions


and selecting one to implement
Bloom’s Taxonomy

 Evaluation
 Synthesis
 Analysis
 Application
 Comprehension
 Knowledge
BLOOM’S TAXONOMY: A
VOCABULARY FOR WRITING
OBJECTIVES

 Cognitive Domain

 Knowledge
 Comprehension
 Application
 Analysis
 Synthesis
 Evaluation
ACTION VERBS

 Use words that describe the


student behavior that is to be
demonstrated (observed).

 The Action Verb should


represent one of the six levels of
the Cognitive Domain.
EXAMPLES OF ACTION
VERB USE
 VAGUE  BETTER
The student will be The student will be
able to . . . able to . . .
do list
compare
know
demonstrate
understand . . .
summarize
prepare
critique . . .

You might also like