0% found this document useful (0 votes)
70 views32 pages

Qualitative Research Data, Design and Analysis

This document outlines several qualitative research designs including action research, ethnography, grounded theory, phenomenology, narrative research, case study, and historical research. For each design, it provides definitions, objectives, examples of data collection methods, and examples of data analysis. Some common data collection methods across designs include interviews, observations, documents, and archival records. Data analysis typically involves description, interpretation, and identifying themes. The purpose is to help structure qualitative research and select the most appropriate design.

Uploaded by

Faisal Raza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
70 views32 pages

Qualitative Research Data, Design and Analysis

This document outlines several qualitative research designs including action research, ethnography, grounded theory, phenomenology, narrative research, case study, and historical research. For each design, it provides definitions, objectives, examples of data collection methods, and examples of data analysis. Some common data collection methods across designs include interviews, observations, documents, and archival records. Data analysis typically involves description, interpretation, and identifying themes. The purpose is to help structure qualitative research and select the most appropriate design.

Uploaded by

Faisal Raza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

DATA, DESIGN AND


ANALYSIS
Usama Bin Iqbal
Qualitative Research Techniques
 Follow the Following format for designing
research.
MAIN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
DESIGN

 Action research
 Ethnography

 Feminist research

 Grounded theory

 Phenomenology

 Narrative research

 Case Study

 Historical research
ACTION RESEARCH
 Definition: In action research, the researcher works in
close collaboration with a group of people to improve a
situation in a particular setting
 Objective
Discussion and suggestions on how to improve a ‘process’ or
‘situation’ by taking immediate action
 Data Collection
 It is not about writing what you think to be true but
about collecting data and making conclusions based on
that data via:
 Experience –by observing (participant observation)

 Enquiry –by asking (informal interviews, formal


structured interviews, questionnaires)
 Examine –by using records (archival documents, notes,
memos, etc.)
ACTION RESEARCH
 Data Analysis
 Description and interpretation of the issue/s;
led to reflect on:
 Did the research actually lead to change or did
a solution to a problem make the difference?

 Example
 “…….to assess, how can our college move to a
performance based model for undergraduate
teacher preparation programs –how can
disciplinary policies be enforced consistently in
our school.........?”
ETHNOGRAPHY
 Ethnography is a design of inquiry coming
from anthropology and sociology in which the
researcher studies the shared patterns of
behaviors, language, and actions of an intact
cultural group in a natural setting over a
prolonged period of time.
 Data collection often involves observations
and interviews.

ETHNOGRAPHY
 Objective
 A description of the cultural behavior of a
group or individual
 Data Collection

 Primarily observations and interviews with


additional artifacts, (Examples include stone
tools, pottery vessels, metal objects such as
weapons, and items of personal adornment
such as buttons, jewelry and clothing. .)
during extended time in the field, e.g. 6
months –1 year
 A collection of data through fieldwork
experiences
ETHNOGRAPHY
 Data Analysis
 Description, thematic analysis, interpretation

 Researcher produces the participants’ views


through closely edited quotes and has final word on
interpretation
 Example

 “…….the purpose of this study was to identify and


describe the conflicts that experienced teachers
encountered as they switched from a traditional
approach to teaching mathematics to a
constructivist-sociological approach –examines the
beliefs and practices of teachers experiencing a
common phenomena related to their approach to
teaching……..”
FEMINISM
 Definition….
FEMINISM
 Data Collection
 Life stories, interviews, focus groups and
conversational analysis; diaries, letters,
documents and texts; questionnaires
 Data Analysis

 Content Analysis; Oral History; Ethnography;


Discourse Analysis; and -participant and non-
participant observation.
GROUNDED THEORY

 Grounded theory can be used to modify and


extend existing theories but it is particularly
useful in situations where little is known
about a topic.
 In grounded theory, methods such as focus
groups and interviews tend to be the
preferred data collection method, along with
a comprehensive literature review which
takes place throughout the data collection
process. This literature review helps to
explain emerging results.
GROUNDED THEORY
 Data Collection.
 Interviews with 20-30 individuals to
‘saturate’ categories and detail a theory
 In-depth interviews -most commonly used

 Relies on open ended questions

 Questions can be modified to reflect


emerging theory
 Observational methods
GROUNDED THEORY
 Grounded theory is a design of inquiry from
sociology in which the researcher derives a
general, abstract theory of a process, action,
or interaction grounded in the views of
participants.
 This process involves using multiple stages of
data collection and the refinement and
interrelationship of categories of information
(Charmaz, 2006; Corbin & Strauss, 2007)
GROUNDED THEORY
 Data Analysis
 Analyzed via coding and memo writing

 Types of coding:

 Open coding refers to the process of generating initial


concepts from data
 Axial coding to the development and linking of concepts
into conceptual families-coding paradigm

 Selective coding to the formalizing of these


relationships into theoretical frameworks

 Memo writing is the intermediate step between coding and the


first draft of completed study
 Hypotheses and ideas recorded during analysis

 Not be treated as complete and fixed, as they are initial


analytical thoughts and can be altered as thinking changes
GROUNDED THEORY
 Example
 “……..the purpose of this study was to
understand the ‘relationship of a social club
to the teachers’ who frequently visit it on
Friday evening. Researcher found that
teachers used the social club to facilitate
their movement from “professional” to
“personal” self –it examined a phenomena of
interest to the researcher (i.e., teachers
congregating at a particular social club on
Friday evenings) and developed a conceptual
understanding of it………”
PHENOMENOLOGY
 Phenomenological research is a design of inquiry
coming from philosophy and psychology in which
the researcher describes the lived experiences of
individuals about a phenomenon as described by
participants.
 This description culminates in the essence of the
experiences for several individuals who have all
experienced the phenomenon.
 This design has strong philosophical underpinnings and
typically involves conducting interviews (Giorgi, 2009;
Moustakas, 1994).

 Phenomenology is the study of “phenomena”:


appearances of things, or things as they appear in our
experience, or the ways we experience thing.
PHENOMENOLOGY
 Data Collection
 Long interviews with up to 10 people

 Studies the structure of various types of


experience including:
 Perception

 Thought

 Memory

 Imagination
RESEARCH QUESTIONS

 What is the essential meaning of an experience?

 For example:
 What is the essence of being a mother after 6
miscarriages?

 What are the feelings of a mother whose only child


is lost in Army Public incident?
 The only survivor of a plane crash who is rescued
after a month from a Plane / Ship crash.
 What was his experience in that jungle? How he
survived?
DATA ANALYSIS

 Researcher chooses phenomenon and selects


appropriate models, frameworks, or theories
to guide data collection
 Participants interviewed

 A description is written that fully describes


the experience.
HISTORICAL RESEARCH
 A process of systematically examining the
past events to give an account of what has
happened in the past.
 Not a mere accumulation of facts and dates
or even a description of past events.
 A flowing, dynamic account of past events
which involves an interpretation of these
events in an attempt to recapture the
nuances, personalities, and ideas that
influenced these events.
HISTORICAL RESEARCH
 Data Collection
 Archival records

 Documents (i.e. diaries, memos, newspapers,


books, etc.).

 Interviews (oral histories -with individuals


who have had experience with or have
knowledge of the research topic)

 Relics (i.e. photographs, maps, architectural


design, etc.).
HISTORICAL RESEARCH
 DATA COLLECTION
 Primary source–that has a direct involvement
with the event being investigated like a diary,
an original map, or an interview with a
person that experienced the event.
 Secondary source–that was created from a
primary source such as books written about
the event, secondary sources are considered
less useful than primary sources.
HISTORICAL RESEARCH
 Data Analysis
 A description of data by the process of criticism (both;
internal and external).
 Every information source must be evaluated for its
authenticity and accuracy because any source can be
affected by a variety of factors such as prejudice, economic
conditions, and political climate.
 Two types of evaluations every source must pass:

 External Criticism –determine the validity, trustworthiness, or


authenticity of the source i.e. handwriting analysis or
determining the age of the paper on which something was
written.

 Internal Criticism –determine the reliability or accuracy of the


information contained in the sources collected; done by both
positive and negative criticism.
HISTORICAL RESEARCH
 Example
 “……..the purpose of study ‘A’ is to examine
the changes in standardized testing of ‘Drug
X’ over the last 40 years. This study
addresses the historical developments
characterizing the use of standardized ‘Drug
X’ tests over a 40 years period……..”
CASE STUDY
 Case studies are a design of inquiry found in
many fields, especially evaluation, in which
the researcher develops an in-depth analysis
of a case, often a program, event, activity,
process, or one or more individuals.
 Cases are bounded by time and activity, and
researchers collect detailed information using
a variety of data collection procedures over a
sustained period of time (Stake, 1995; Yin,
2009, 2012).
CASE STUDY
 Data Collection
 Documents (letters, agendas, progress
reports)
 Archival records (Service records,
organizational charts, budgets etc.)
 Interviews (typically open-ended but also
focused, structured & surveys are possible)
 Direct observations (formal or casual; useful
to have multiple observers)
 Participant observation (assuming a role in
the situation and getting an inside view of
the events)
CASE STUDY
 Data Analysis
 Pattern matching (explanatory/descriptive)
-comparing empirical based patterns with
predicted one(s)

 Explanation-building (mainly explanatory)


-analyzing case study data by building an
explanation about the case and identifying a set
of causal links

 Time-series analysis -“How” and “why”


questions about relationships and changes of
events over time
CASE STUDY
 Example
 “…….this study explored the meaning of
“inclusion” for three disabled students who
had been placed in a regular education
setting, it examines in-depth a phenomena of
interest to the researcher (i.e., the meaning
of inclusion) in a natural context viewing it
from the participant’s perspectives……..”
NARRATIVE RESEARCH
 Narrative research is a design of inquiry
from the humanities in which the
researcher studies the lives of individuals
and asks one or more individuals to provide
stories about their lives (Riessman,2008).
 This information is then often retold or
restored by the researcher into a narrative
chronology.
 Often, in the end, the narrative combines
views from the participant’s life with those of
the
 researcher’s life in a collaborative narrative
(Clandinin & Connelly, 2000).
NARRATIVE RESEARCH
 Data Collection
 Collects the individual stories told to the researcher
or gathered through field texts; primarily via
interviews and documents, where researcher:
 Gathers stories and analyzes them for elements
of the story
 Rewrites the story to place it in a chronological
sequence

 Where:
 Re-story provides a causal link among ideas

 Information would include interaction, continuity,


and situation
NARRATIVE RESEARCH
 Data Analysis
 Stories, re-stories, description of context,
themes, where focus is on:
 Relevant facts and content to research
interest
 Authority and credibility of the source:
reliability
 Timeliness of the evidence

 Quality of the source: writing, accuracy, and


thoroughness
NARRATIVE RESEARCH
 Example
 “…….to understand, the experiences of a
veteran teacher who has been moved into an
administrative position in her school………?”
 “……..to study, what does “inclusion” mean
to a special needs child who is placed in a
regular education classroom……….?’

You might also like