0% found this document useful (0 votes)
423 views10 pages

Case 1 - Term Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc. Group 3

The document discusses two term sheets from Alpha and Mega venture capital firms offering $5 million in financing for Trendsetter Inc. It compares key terms of the term sheets such as valuation, employee stock pool, liquidation preference, anti-dilution, and board composition. While Alpha offers a lower pre-money valuation if milestones are not met and more favorable vesting terms, Mega provides a higher founder valuation, lower liquidation preference, and simpler anti-dilution. Overall, the document analyzes the tradeoffs between the term sheets to help Trendsetter decide which offer to accept.

Uploaded by

Avanish Nagar 23
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
423 views10 pages

Case 1 - Term Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc. Group 3

The document discusses two term sheets from Alpha and Mega venture capital firms offering $5 million in financing for Trendsetter Inc. It compares key terms of the term sheets such as valuation, employee stock pool, liquidation preference, anti-dilution, and board composition. While Alpha offers a lower pre-money valuation if milestones are not met and more favorable vesting terms, Mega provides a higher founder valuation, lower liquidation preference, and simpler anti-dilution. Overall, the document analyzes the tradeoffs between the term sheets to help Trendsetter decide which offer to accept.

Uploaded by

Avanish Nagar 23
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Case 1 - Term Sheet Negotiations for Trendsetter Inc.

Group 3

Priyanshi Garg - PGP/23/102


Samyak Chaudhary - PGP/23/109
Abhishek Gautam - PGP/23/373
Avanish Nagar - PGP/23/381
Term Sheets

 Integral part of the entrepreneurial process in the USA and abroad


 Each day hundreds of term sheets are proposed and evaluated by entrepreneurs and
those who finance them
 Many entrepreneurs are not well versed in term sheets
 It is dangerous for an entrepreneur to assume that it will suffice if only his or her
lawyer understands the term sheet
 Each entrepreneur should spend time studying term sheets before discussing his or
her own term sheet under pressure in real time

2
Comparison of Term Sheets

 If you were advising the entrepreneurs at Trendsetter, and you would not change any of
the terms in either term sheet, which would you recommend?

 What are some of the contextual elements of Trendsetter that you consider relevant
for the analysis of the two financing offers?
 Typical case; Trendsetter needs capital upfront to develop software
 Entrepreneurs have done quite well in creating interest among VCs; seven
presentations and six firms showed interest
 Time is of the essence (six weeks of cash left)

3
Comparison of Term Sheets

 How do the two term sheets compare?

 Clearly there are a lot of issues to compare. How can one sensibly structure the
comparison into categories?
 Valuation
 Liquidation preference and Anti-dilution
 Corporate Governance
 Vesting and Employment
 Comparison and Renegotiation
 International Comparison

4
“Flags” in Term Sheets

 Green Flags
 Simple language
 Little downside protection for investors
 Plain vanilla convertible stock
 Yellow Flags
 Milestones (can lead to short-term optimizing)
 Complicated terms
 Language that requires negotiations later
 “mutually agreeable”
 “to be determined”
 Restrictive terms regarding appointment of 5th director
 Option pool comes out of founders’ shares
 Potential conflict: VC may want to award options to newly hired employees
while entrepreneur may resist

5
“Flags” in Term Sheets … continued

 Red Flags
 Too many milestones
 Lengthy exclusivity of term sheet
 Complex due diligence procedures
 Clauses / milestones that take control from founders
 Mezzanine-style provisions in early found term sheets

 Other key points


 Personal chemistry and reputation can be more important than higher pre-
money valuation
 Work with lawyers who have extensive experience
 Ask for their VC list and deal list
 Specific VC partner matters more than the VC Firm
 Which VC partner will be on your board?

6
Differences in the Term Sheets

Alpha Better / Worse from the Mega


entrepreneur’s
perspective
Amount of Investment $5,000,000 = $5,000,000

Pre-Dollar Valuation $7,350,000 if meets hurdle depends $7,000,000


$6,650,000 if does not meet
hurdle
Employee Pool (# of 3,000,000 < 2,500,000
shares)

Implied owner value $4,200,000 if meets hurdle < $4,500,000


$3,800,000 if does not meet
hurdle
Escrow 501,253 shares Non

Issue Price $1.05 if meets hurdle $1.00


$0.95 if does not meet
hurdle
Dividend Noncumulative Cumulative
7.6% if meets hurdle 10%
8.4% if does not meet
hurdle 7

Number of Investors 2 VCs depends 1 VC


Differences in the Term Sheets - continued
Alpha Better / Worse from the Mega
entrepreneur’s
perspective
Liquidation Preference 3X depends 1.5X
1.25 in multiple
0.25 in dividend
Conversion Same =
Automatic Conversion Similar Higher Definition of a
Lower Definition of a Qualified
Qualified IPO ($5 / share; > IPO ($20 / share; total
total offering >=$15M) offering
>= $25M)
Type of Security to be Convertible preferred Convertible participating
issued stock preferred stock
Redemption Rights None > Series A share price plus
unpaid dividends
Anti-dilution Weighted average > Weighted average is sale
between 50% -100% of
price in Series A
Full ratcheted if less than
50%
Voting Rights Super Majority voting as > Super Majority voting as class
class in many specific in instances not specified
instances yet (closing docs)

8
Differences in the Term Sheets - continued
Alpha Better / Worse from the Mega
entrepreneur’s
perspective
Representations & Same =
Warranties

Nondisclosure Same =

Right for First Refusal Given to investors = Given to investors (called


pre-emptive)

Co-Sale Rights Given to investors (p4) < No rights

Information Rights For investors > $250K > For any investor

Board 5 Total < 5 Total


2 VCs 2 VCs
1 CEO 1 CEO
2 Co (1 choice, 1 board) 2 Co (1 choice, 1 board)
Note: last board seat goes
to VC if Co misses hurdle)
Compensation committee Controlled by VCs < None

9
Differences in the Term Sheets - continued

Alpha Better / Worse from the Mega


entrepreneur’s
perspective
Counsel and Expenses Investor choice of counsel - Counsel already chosen by
(but Trendsetter pays investors
<=$20K)
Indemnification Same =

Registration Rights Same -


(but for definition of
Qualified IPO)
Founders Vesting Same base -

Founders Acceleration 6 months acceleration in depends None


termination (to be negotiated as part of
Accelerated vesting employment contract)
(double trigger) in change of
control

Misc Termination 6 months salary if fired Depends None

10

You might also like