IFRS Convergence in India: Overview & Challenges
IFRS Convergence in India: Overview & Challenges
IFRS convergence requires Indian companies to reclassify and regroup financial statement items to meet global standards. This includes separating assets and liabilities into current and non-current categories, regrouping expenses by their function, and ensuring consistency across various reports. These changes enhance transparency and comparability but require significant adaptation in accounting systems and practices .
Proponents of IFRS argue that it leads to better resource allocation decisions, more efficient capital markets, and a lower cost of capital. IFRS also enhances the level of communication of financial results to analysts, investors, and stakeholders, and provides consistency in financial reporting, making it easier to compare financial positions across different countries and benefiting multinational companies .
Multinational companies may prefer using IFRS because it provides a consistent financial reporting framework across countries, which facilitates better comparability between entities and improves communication with global analysts, investors, and stakeholders. It also eliminates the need to report under different GAAP standards, thus simplifying reporting processes and potentially lowering costs .
Under IFRS, borrowings are classified between current and non-current liabilities, and long-term borrowings due within 12 months are included as current liabilities. In contrast, IGAAP classifies borrowings into secured and unsecured loans without necessarily separating them into current and non-current categories .
IFRS requires the measurement of profit in the functional currency, but entities can present financial statements in a different currency if needed. IGAAP mandates using Indian Rupees as the reporting currency. This flexibility under IFRS benefits global companies by allowing them to report in a currency that reflects operational realities, thus simplifying consolidations and comparisons across subsidiaries .
The fair value approach under IFRS poses risks for Indian companies as it introduces complexity in measurement and recognition. This approach contrasts with the historical cost method used in IGAAP, potentially leading to financial statement volatility and creating challenges in adapting companies' IT systems and staff training to handle these variations .
Under IFRS, property, plant, and equipment are valued at fair value or historical cost less accumulated depreciation, while IGAAP uses historical cost without fair value adjustments. This could lead to different asset valuations and impact financial statements as IFRS reflects current market conditions more accurately, potentially leading to greater volatility and differences in asset and depreciation reporting .
IFRS mandates that expenses be presented based on their function in the income statement, such as cost of goods sold, selling and distribution, and administrative categories. In contrast, IGAAP allows for expenses to be disclosed by their nature, such as depreciation or salaries. This difference in presentation can impact financial analysis by changing how expenses are categorized, influencing profitability assessments and comparative analysis across companies .
The convergence with IFRS in India faces several challenges, including a reluctance to adopt the fair value approach, substantial complexity in recognition and measurement requirements, and a significant change in the accounting perspective and objectives. These challenges affect the structuring of ESOP schemes, training of employees, tax planning, IT system modifications, and compliance with debt covenants, making it difficult for smaller companies to keep pace with convergence processes .
IFRS convergence in India is divided into three phases. Phase 1 covers companies with a net worth of Rs 1000 crores or more, which began their transition to IFRS on 1 April 2011. Phase 2 includes companies with a net worth between Rs 500 crores and Rs 1000 crores, which transitioned starting from 1 April 2013. Finally, Phase 3 focuses on listed companies with a net worth less than Rs 500 crores, with their transition commencing on 1 April 2014 .