0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2K views10 pages

Non-Compendial Dissolution Methods

Amity Institute of Pharmacy discusses advanced biopharmaceutics and pharmacokinetics. It describes several non-compendial dissolution testing methods including the rotating/static disk method, rotating bottle method, beaker method, and flask stirrer method. It also discusses peristalsis method to simulate gastrointestinal tract conditions and some problems of variable control in dissolution testing such as variations in equipment, centering of paddles, turbulence, clogging, and dissolved gases affecting results.

Uploaded by

dipti_sriv
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2K views10 pages

Non-Compendial Dissolution Methods

Amity Institute of Pharmacy discusses advanced biopharmaceutics and pharmacokinetics. It describes several non-compendial dissolution testing methods including the rotating/static disk method, rotating bottle method, beaker method, and flask stirrer method. It also discusses peristalsis method to simulate gastrointestinal tract conditions and some problems of variable control in dissolution testing such as variations in equipment, centering of paddles, turbulence, clogging, and dissolved gases affecting results.

Uploaded by

dipti_sriv
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Amity Institute of Pharmacy

Advanced Biopharm and


pharmacokinetics

M. Pharm (II Sem)

1
GRADE ‘A’ ACCREDITED BY NAAC AUUP HQ

• Definition
• Objectives
• Different methods used for dissolution comparison
• Comparison of different methods

2
Non-compendial methods
• ROTATING/STATIC DISK METHOD
•  Developed by late Eino Nelson and described by Levy and Sahli.
•  In this method ,the drug is compressed in a non-disintegrating disc
without excipients.
•  The disc is mounted in a holder so that only one face of the disc is
exposed to the dissolution medium.
•  The holder and disc are immersed in medium and held in a fixed
position as in static disc method and rotated at a given speed in rotating
disc method.
• Samples are collected at predetermined times.
• Surface area of the drug through which dissolution occurs
is kept constant –intrinsic dissolution rate mainly used for
controlled release beads.
ROTATING BOTTLE METHOD:
• It consists of rotating rack to hold sample drug products in
bottles and they are capped tightly & rotated in 37°C
temperature bath.
•Sample are decanted through a 40 mesh screen and residue
are assayed.
•To the remaining drug residues within the bottles are
added an equal volume of fresh medium and dissolution
test is continued.
• A dissolution test with pH 1.2 medium for 1 h,pH 2.5
medium for the next 1h,followed by 4.5 medium for 1.5
h, pH 7.0 medium for 1.5 h, and pH 7.5 medium for 2 h
was recommended to simulate condition of the
gastrointestinal tract.
• BEAKER METHOD:
• Reported by Levy and Hayes(1960).
• Dissolution medium, 250ml of 0.1N HCl at 37°C placed
in a 400ml beaker.
• Agitation by three blade polyethylene stirrer,5cm
diameter and rotates at 60 rpm.
• Stirrer immersed to a depth of 2.7 cm in medium and in
the center.
• Tablets are placed in a beaker and test was carried out.
• Samples are removed and assayed for the content.
• FLASK STIRRER METHOD
• Developed by Poole(1969).It includes RBF and a stirring
element similar to that of beaker method.
• RBF used to avoid the formation of moulds of particles in
different positions on the flat bottom of a beaker.
• PERISTALSIS METHOD:
• To stimulate hydrodynamic condition of GIT tract in
an in-vitro dissolution device.
• It consists of rigid plastic cylindrical tubing fitted with
septum and rubber stopper at both ends.
• Dissolution chamber consists of a space between
septum and lower stopper.
• Dissolution medium is pumped with peristaltic action
through the dosage form.
Problems of variable control in dissolution testing

 Variations of 25% or more may occur with the same type of equipment and
procedure.
 Centering and alignment of paddle is critical in paddle method
 Turbulence can create increased dissolution resulting in a higher dissolution
rate
 Wobbling and tilting due to worn equipment should be avoided
 Basket method is sensitive to clogging due to gummy materials
 Dissolved gas may form air bubbles on the surface of the dosage form unit
affecting dissolution in both paddle and basket type
 In the absence of In vivo data,impossible to make valid conclusions about
bioavailability from disso data alone
 For many products ,dissolution rates are higher with paddle method

10

Common questions

Powered by AI

The rotating bottle method involves a rotating rack to hold samples in bottles that are rotated in a temperature-controlled bath at 37°C, aimed at simulating the variations in the gastrointestinal environment using different pH levels. In contrast, the beaker method utilizes a 400ml beaker with a dissolution medium agitated by a polyethylene stirrer. While the rotating bottle method focuses on simulating dynamic conditions, the beaker method provides a more static environment at a constant temperature with fixed agitation, useful for straightforward dissolution measurement .

The peristalsis method simulates gastrointestinal conditions by using rigid plastic cylindrical tubing fitted with septum and rubber stoppers. It creates a dissolution chamber where the medium is pumped through using peristaltic action. This method mimics the hydrodynamic conditions of the gastrointestinal tract, facilitating a more realistic representation of how drugs dissolve and are released in physiological settings .

The objectives of using different methods for dissolution testing in pharmacokinetics include assessing the rate at which drug substances dissolve under standardized conditions, simulating the physiological environment of the gastrointestinal tract, and evaluating the performance of controlled-release formulations. These methods aim to provide data that predict the in vivo behavior of drugs, aiding in the understanding of their bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy .

In the paddle method for dissolution testing, the alignment of the paddle is critical as it ensures uniform flow and proper distribution of the dissolution medium around the dosage form. Misalignment can lead to uneven dissolution rates, impacting the validity of the test results. Proper alignment minimizes turbulence and helps achieve consistent and reproducible dissolution profiles .

The intrinsic dissolution rate is crucial for controlled release beads because it measures the dissolution rate of a substance independent of variables such as its formulation or surface area changes during the dissolution process. This measurement is essential for designing controlled release formulations where maintaining a consistent and predictable rate of drug release is critical to ensure therapeutic efficacy over an extended period .

Potential drawbacks of using non-compendial methods include the lack of standardization, which can lead to high variability in results and difficulty in comparing data across studies. Non-compendial methods may not accurately reproduce physiological conditions, leading to discrepancies in predicting in vivo behavior. Additionally, these methods might require more sophisticated equipment and adherence to specific procedural requirements, increasing complexity and the potential for error .

The rotating disk method maintains a constant surface area for intrinsic dissolution rate studies by compressing the drug into a non-disintegrating disc without excipients. The disc's holder ensures that only one face of it is exposed to the dissolution medium, allowing for a consistent exposure area throughout the procedure. This setup allows the intrinsic dissolution rate to be determined precisely by keeping the surface area through which dissolution occurs unchanged .

pH changes during the rotating bottle method mimic the conditions of the gastrointestinal tract by sequentially adjusting the pH of the dissolution medium to simulate the various environments encountered as a drug passes from the stomach (acidic pH) to the intestine (neutral to basic pH). This dynamic adjustment of pH over the testing period helps to better predict how a drug might behave in vivo, considering the GI tract’s varying pH levels .

Controlling air bubble formation on dosage units during dissolution testing is important because bubbles can adhere to the surface of the dosage form, reducing the effective surface area exposed to the dissolution medium. This effect can lead to underestimation of the dissolution rate and affect the reproducibility and accuracy of the test. Ensuring proper deaeration of the medium and careful procedural controls are necessary to prevent such occurrences and achieve reliable results .

Challenges that can potentially affect the accuracy of dissolution testing methods, particularly the paddle method, include critical alignment and centering of the paddle, which if not maintained can lead to irregular dissolution patterns. Other issues include turbulence which can increase the dissolution rate artificially, wobbling and tilting caused by worn equipment, and air bubbles forming on the dosage form's surface due to dissolved gases, all of which can skew results. Moreover, without in vivo data, drawing valid conclusions about bioavailability from dissolution data alone is problematic .

You might also like