0% found this document useful (0 votes)
84 views39 pages

Riskmetrics Model for Financial Securities

The document summarizes the Riskmetrics model for measuring risk in fixed income securities, foreign exchange, and equities portfolios. It provides examples of calculating Daily Earnings at Risk (DEAR) for positions in each asset class, accounting for factors like duration, yield changes, exchange rate volatility, and stock market returns. It then demonstrates aggregating DEAR across asset classes into a total portfolio DEAR, accounting for correlations between positions.

Uploaded by

karl_o_karl
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
84 views39 pages

Riskmetrics Model for Financial Securities

The document summarizes the Riskmetrics model for measuring risk in fixed income securities, foreign exchange, and equities portfolios. It provides examples of calculating Daily Earnings at Risk (DEAR) for positions in each asset class, accounting for factors like duration, yield changes, exchange rate volatility, and stock market returns. It then demonstrates aggregating DEAR across asset classes into a total portfolio DEAR, accounting for correlations between positions.

Uploaded by

karl_o_karl
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Riskmetrics model:

• FIXED INCOME SECURITIES :


Daily price volatility = (Price sensitivity to a small
change in yield) * (Adverse daily yield move)
OR
Daily price volatility = Duration/(1+R) * (Adverse
daily yield move)
Knowing initial market value, Daily earnings at risk
(DEAR):
DEAR = Daily price volatility * Dollar market value
position = Duration/(1+R)* P *dR
Riskmetrics model:
• FIXED INCOME SECURITIES (EXAMPLE):
– From statistics, we know that probability that deviation in
interest rates will be more than 1.65 
is 10%. Thus, for adverse deviation probability is 5%
– Trading portfolio of $1mln
– Standard deviation (  ) is 10 basis points
– Duration of portfolio is 7 years
– Current total yield on this portfolio = 7.243%
– What are potential loss in earnings on this portfolio if the
1 bad day in 20 occurs tomorrow?

PLEASE SEE “STATISTIC RECAP” SLIDES AT THE END OF PPT


Riskmetrics model:
• FIXED INCOME SECURITIES (EXAMPLE cont-d):
– Interest rate change = 1.65*Standard deviation =
1.65*10bp = 16.5 bp or 0.165%

– Daily price volatility= -Duration/(1+R)*(Adverse daily


move) = - 7/(1+0.07243)*(0.00165)=1.077%

– DEAR = Dollar market value of position*Price


volatility = 1,000,000*1.077% = 10,770$
Riskmetrics model:
• FIXED INCOME SECURITIES :
We can measure 1 day VAR, which is DEAR
calculations shown on previous slides

What if we need to measure N day VAR?


VAR = DEAR * N
Riskmetrics model:
• FOREIGN EXCHANGE
VAR = (Dollar value of position)*(Forex volatility)
where,
Dollar value of position = FX position*$/1 foreign currency
Forex volatility = expected adverse change in US dollar value
Riskmetrics model:
• FOREIGN EXCHANGE (EXAMPLE):
– Trading position in Euro (e.g. bond denominated
in Euro) 1.6 million Euro
– Current $/Euro FX rate = 0.625
– Standard deviation of $/Euro FX rate is 56.5bp
– What is the potential daily earnings exposure to
adverse euro to dollar exchange rate changes for
FI from the 1.6 million euro trading portfolio?
*Adverse euro to dollar exchange rate of 1 bad day
in 20 occurs
Riskmetrics model:
• FOREIGN EXCHANGE (EXAMPLE cont-d):
– Current dollar value position = Euro position*FX
rate = 1.6million Euro*0.625 = $1 million
– FX rate change = 1.65*Standard deviation =
1.65*56.5 bp = 93.2 basis points or 0.932%
– DEAR = Dollar value of position*FX rate change =
$1million*0.00932 = $9,320
Riskmetrics model:
• EQUITIES
DEAR = Dollar value of position * Stock market
return volatility

Individual stock market return volatility =


Systematic risk + Unsystematic risk
OR
Individual stock market return volatility:
β 2 σ 2market  σ firm
2
Riskmetrics model:
• EQUITIES (EXAMPLE):
– FI holds portfolio of stocks which replicates the
stock market index S&P100 in amount $1million
– FI portfolio is very well diversified
– Standard deviation of market return of S&P100 is
200bp
– What loss will FI incur if adverse stock market
returns materialize tomorrow?
*Adverse stock market returns of 1 bad day in 20
occurs
Riskmetrics model:
• EQUITIES (EXAMPLE cont-d):
– Very well diversified portfolio => Unsystematic
risk ( firm ) =O
– Portfolio replicates S&P100 => portfolio returns
replicate Market index, thus β  1 and
σ portfolio  σ S&P100
– Change in market return of portfolio = Standard
deviation *1.65 = 1.65*200bp = 330bp or 3.3%
– DEAR = Dollar amount of portfolio*Change in
market return = $1mln*0.033 = $33,000
Riskmetrics model:
• PORTFOLIO AGGREGATION:
We cannot simply sum up all DEARs, because that ignores
any degree of offsetting or correlation amount fixed
income (FI), FX and Equity (EQ) trading positions.
DEAR Portfolio formula:
1/ 2
DEAR  DEAR  DEAR  
2
fi
2
fx
2
eq
 
 2 * Corrfi_fx * DEAR fi * DEAR fx  
DEAR_Portfolio   
  2 * Corrfi_eq * DEAR fi * DEAR 
eq 

 2 * Corrfx_eq * DEAR fx * DEAR eq 


 
where
DEAR = Daily earnings at risk from FI, EQ or FX
Corr = correlation between FI, EQ or FX
Riskmetrics model:
• PORTFOLIO AGGREGATION (EXAMPLE)
• DEAR (fixed income securities) = $10,770
• DEAR (Forex) = 9,320$
• DEAR (Equities) = 33,000$
• Correlation between returns on FIXED INCOME
SECURITIES and EQUITIES = 0.4
• Correlation between returns on FIXED INCOME
SECURITIES and FOREX = -2
• Correlation between returns on FOREX and
EQUITIES = 0.1
• WHAT is DEAR of Portfolio?
Riskmetrics model:
• PORTFOLIO AGGREGATION (EXAMPLE cont-d)
1/ 2
DEAR  DEAR  DEAR  
2
fi
2
fx
2
eq
 
 2 * Corrfi_fx * DEAR fi * DEAR fx  
DEAR_Portfolio   
  2 * Corrfi_eq * DEAR fi * DEAR 
eq 

 2 * Corrfx_eq * DEAR fx * DEAR eq 


 

DEAR of portfolio = (10,7702+93202+33,0002+


+2*(-2)*10,770*9,320+
+2*(0.4)*10,770*33,000+
+2*(0.1)*9,320*33,000)1/2= $39,969
Recap of statistics:
• 3 sigma Rule:
• Every normal curve (regardless of its mean or standard
deviation) conforms to the following "rule".
– About 68% of the area under the curve falls within 1 standard
deviation of the mean.
– About 95% of the area under the curve falls within 2 standard
deviations of the mean.
– About 99.7% of the area under the curve falls within 3 standard
deviations of the mean.

• To be used in this PPT:


– About 90% of the area under the curve falls within 1.65
standard deviations of the mean.
Effect of the credit risk on return of FI:
• The contractually promised return on a loan
depends on the following factors:
– Interest rate on the loan
– Any fees relating to the loan
– The credit risk premium on the loan
– The collateral backing of the loan
– Other non-price terms (e.g. compensating balance
and reserve requirement)
Effect of the credit risk on return of FI:
• The contractually promised return on a loan (1+k):
of  (BR  m)
1 k  1
1  [b(1  RR)]
k- gross return on the loan
of – direct fees
BR – base lending rate
m – credit risk premium
b – % of the loan held as non-interest bearing
compensating balance
RR – reserve requirement by Central Bank
Effect of the credit risk on return of FI:
• The contractually promised return on a loan
(1+k) EXAMPLE:
FI issued loan on the following terms:
- Base rate – 12%, credit risk premium – 2%
- Loan origination fee 0.125% of the loan amount
- Compensating balance of 10% of the loan amount
- Central bank reserve requirement 10%
What is the contractually promised return on a
loan?
Effect of the credit risk on return of FI:
• The contractually promised return on a loan
(1+k) EXAMPLE:
of  (BR  m)
1 k  1
1  [b(1  RR)]

1+k = [1+(0.00125+(O.12+0.02)]/[1-(0.1/(1-0.1)]
Contractually promised return on a loan =
15.52%
Effect of the credit risk on return of FI:
• The expected return on a Loan depends on
the following:
– Contractually promised return on a loan
– Probability of default

Expected return E(r) = p*(1+k) + (1-p)*Zero OR


Expected return E(r) = p*(1+k)
p – probability of the repayment of the loan
1+k – contractually promised return on a loan
Effect of the credit risk on return of FI:
• The expected return on a Loan EXAMPLE:
– FI contractually promised return on a loan is 12%
– Probability of default of the loan is 2.5%
Expected return?

• Expected return of the loan =


(1+0.12)*0.975+(1-0.975)*Zero = 1.092
i.e. Expected return is 9.2%
Measurement of Credit risk:
• Linear probability model calculates probability of
default using linear regression model
n
PD i   β j *X ij  Error
j1

PD – probability of default of loan i


Beta j – importance of factor j in past repayment
experience
X (ij) – observed factor j in loan i
Measurement of Credit risk:
• Linear probability model EXAMPLE:
– Based on historic data FI identified the following
PD pattern for the Borrowers:
PD =0.5(Leverage ratio)+0.1(Sales/Asset ratio)
– Perspective borrowers Debt/Equity ratio = 0.3 and
Sales/Assets = 2
– Assume Error = zero
– What is expected Probability of Default of the
Perspective borrower?
Measurement of Credit risk:
• Linear probability model EXAMPLE:

PD =0.5(Leverage ratio)+0.1(Sales/Asset ratio)


PD = 0.5*0.3+0.1*2 = 0.15+0.2 = 0.35 or 35%

Expected default of the perspective Borrower is 35%


Measurement of Credit risk:
• Linear discriminant model – divides borrowers to
high/low default classes
• Altman’s discriminant model:
Z  1.2 X 1  1.4 X 2  3.3 X 3  0.6 X 4  X 5
X1 – Working capital/Total assets
X2 – Retained earnings/Total assets
X3 – EBIT/Total assets
X4 – Market Value of equity/Book value of long-term debt
X5 – Sales/Total assets
Altman’s discriminant interpretation:
If Z<1.81 => high default risk
If Z>2.99 => low default risk
If 1.81>Z>2.99 =. Indeterminate default risk
Measurement of Credit risk:
• Term structure derivation of Credit risk
Probability of default on a one period debt instrument:
• Contractually promised return on corporate bond 1+k
• Contractually promised return on risk free bond 1+i
• FI is indifferent which one to give, when expected return
on corporate bond is equal to expected return on risk free
bond:
• Hence, (1+k)*p = 1+i, where p is probability of repayment
of the loan
Probability of default (1-p) = 1-(1+i)/(1+k)
Risk premium = k-I
As perceived by the market probability of default (1-p)
requires the FI to set risk premium of k-i
Measurement of Credit risk:
• Term structure derivation of Credit risk
Probability of default on a one period debt instrument
EXAMPLE:
• Interest rate on Treasury bills 10%
• Interest rate on Corporate bond grad A 15.8%

• Probability of default = 1-(1+0.1)/(1+0.158) = 5%


• Risk premium = 15.8%-10% = 5.8%
Market requires risk premium of 5.8% for default
probability of 5%
Measurement of Credit risk:
• Term structure derivation of Credit risk
Probability of default on multi-period debt instrument:
• Cumulative default probability = 1 –p1*p2*p3..
where p1 is default probability in period 1
p2 is default probability in period 2 and so on
Measurement of Credit risk:
• Term structure derivation of Credit risk
Probability of default on multi-period debt instrument:
For 1st period: (1+k1)*p1 = 1+i
For 2nd period: (1+c1)*p2 = 1+forward rate
Assume no arbitrage profit, i.e. (1+i2)2=(1+f)*(1+i1)

1. Find return for the second period on Treasury bond:


(1+ 2-year interest rate)2=(1+forward rate)*(1+ 1-year interest rate)
OR (1+i2)2=(1+f)*(1+i1) => f = (1+i2)2/(1+i1) -1

[Link] return for the second period on Corporate bond:


(1+c1) = (1+return on 2-year bond)2/(1+return 1-year bond)

3. Find probability of default in the second period


1- p2= 1- (1+f)/(1+c1)
Measurement of Credit risk:
• Term structure derivation of Credit risk
Probability of default on multi-period debt instrument
EXAMPLE:
– Required yields for 1 year Treasury bond 10%
– Required yields for 2 year Treasury bond 11%
– Required yields for 1 year Corporate bond 15.8%
– Required yields for 2 year Corporate bond 18%
– What is Cumulative probability of default?
Measurement of Credit risk:
• Term structure derivation of Credit risk
Probability of default on multi-period debt instrument
EXAMPLE:

1. Find return for the second period on Treasury bond:


f = (1+i2)2/(1+i1) -1 => f=(1+11%) 2/(1+10%) -1 =12%
2. Find return for the second period on Corporate bond:
(1+c1) = (1+18%)2/(1+15.8%) =20%
3. Find probability of default in the second period 1- p2
1- p2= 1- (1+f)/(1+c1) = 1 – 93% = 7%
4. Cumulative default
Cumulative default = 1 –p1*p2 = 1-95%*93%=11.5%
Simple models of loan concentration risk

Concentration limits:
– On loans to individual borrower.
– Concentration limit = Maximum loss  Loss rate.
• Maximum loss expressed as percent of capital.
– Some countries, such as Chile, specify limits by
sector or industry
Modern portfolio theory
• To apply Loan portfolio theory you need:
– (i) expected return on loan (measured by all-in-
spread);
– (ii) loan risk;
– (iii) correlation of loan default risks.
Modern portfolio theory
(formulas)
n
- Expected Return: R p   X i Ri
i 1
Where:
- Ri – Mean return of i-th loan
- Xi – Proportion of i-th investment in total
portfolio
Modern portfolio theory
(formulas)
Variance:  p2  X A2 A2  X B2 B2  2 X i X j i , j 
 X   X   2 X i X j  i , j A B
2
A
2
A
2
B
2
B

Where:
- Xi – Proportion of i-th investment in total portfolio
- Xj – Proportion of j-th investment in total portfolio
- δi – Standard deviation of i-th investment
- δj – Standard deviation of j-th investment
- δi,j – Covariance between the returns of i and j investments
- ρi,j – Correlation between the returns of i and j investments
Modern portfolio theory (Example)

• Expected return = 0.4*10%+0.6*12% = 11%


Modern portfolio theory (Example)
• Risk of portfolio:
Variance = 0.42*0.007344+0.62*0.009604+
+2*0.4*0.6*(-0.84)*0.0857*0.098 =
= 0.0012462
Risk (standard deviation) = 0.0353 = 3.53%
KMV portfolio manager model
Annual spread Annual fees

• Return on the loan = Annual all in spread (AIS)


– Expected loss (EL)
Expected Default frequency (PD) x Loss given default (LGD)

• Risk of the loan = PD(1 PD)


x LGD
• Correlation between systematic returns of
investment i and j
KMV portfolio manager model (Example)

• Loan A:
– Return = 5%+2% - 25%*3% = 6.25%
– Risk = [3%*(1-3%)]0.5x 25% = 4.265%
• Loan B:
– Return = 4.5%+1.5% - 20%*2% = 5.6%
– Risk = [2%*(1-2%)]0.5x 20% = 2.8%
KMV portfolio manager model (Example)

• Portfolio (A and B):


– Return = 60% x 6.25%+40% x 5.6% = 5.99%
– Risk:
Variance= 60%2 x(4.265%)2+ 40%2 x(2.8%)2 +
+2x40%x60%x(-0.25)x(4.265%)x(2.8%) = 0.06369%
Risk = (0.06369%)0.5 = 2.52%

You might also like