0% found this document useful (0 votes)
184 views45 pages

Combustion Design Considerations: EGR 4347 Analysis and Design of Propulsion Systems

The document discusses considerations for combustion chamber design. It outlines key design goals like complete combustion and stability over a range of operating conditions. It also defines important parameters and equations for analyzing the combustion process and determining design characteristics like chamber length and pressure losses.

Uploaded by

MASOUD
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
184 views45 pages

Combustion Design Considerations: EGR 4347 Analysis and Design of Propulsion Systems

The document discusses considerations for combustion chamber design. It outlines key design goals like complete combustion and stability over a range of operating conditions. It also defines important parameters and equations for analyzing the combustion process and determining design characteristics like chamber length and pressure losses.

Uploaded by

MASOUD
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Combustion Design

Considerations

EGR 4347
Analysis and Design of Propulsion
Systems

1
PROPERTIES OF COMBUSTION CHAMBERS

• Complete combustion
• Low total pressure loss
• Stability of combustion process
• Proper temperature distribution at the exit with no “hot
spots”
• Short length and small cross section
• Freedom from flameout
• Relightability
• Operation over a wide range of mass flow rates,
pressure and temperatures

2
COMBUSTOR DESIGN GOALS ARE DEFINED
BY THE ENGINE OPERATING
REQUIREMENTS

• LEAN BLOW OUT FUEL-AIR RATIO


• IGNITION FUEL-AIR RATIO
• PATTERN FACTOR
• RADIAL PROFILE FACTOR
• PRESSURE DROP (SYSTEM AND LINER)
• COMBUSTION EFFICIENCY
• MAXIMUM WALL TEMPERATURE
• SMOKE AND GASEOUS EMISSIONS
3
CRITICAL DESIGN PARAMETERS

• Equivalence ratio, 
• Combustor loading parameter, CLP
• Space heat release rate, SR
• Reference velocity, Vref
• Main burner dome height, Hd
• Main burner length/dome height ratio, Lmb/Hd
• Passage velocity, Vpass
• Number and spacing of fuel injectors
• Pattern factor correlation parameters, PF
• Profile factor correlation parameter, Pf

4
DEFINITION OF TERMS

• PATTERN FACTOR
(TEXIT)MAX - (TEXIT)AVE
PF =
(TEXIT)AVE - (TINLET)AVE
• SYSTEM PRESSURE DROP

(PINLET)TOTAL - (PEXIT)TOTAL
DPS =
(PINLET)TOTAL
• LINER PRESSURE DROP
(PINLET)STATIC - (PEXIT)STATIC
DP = 5
(PINLET)STATIC
COMBUSTION PROCESS

• REACTION RATE - f(Temp, Press)

– T & P high fast reaction rate

– limited by rate at which fuel is vaporized

• FUEL/AIR RATIO (OCTANE e.g.)

– 2C8H18 + 25(O2 + 79/21 N2) 16 CO2 + 18H2O + 25(79/21)N2


2(96  18)
 0.0664
– fstoich = 25(32  79 21  28)

 ff
• EQUIVALENCE RATIO, stoich

6
ENGINE OPERATION AFFECTS INGNITION
AND LEAN STABILITY

OPERATIONAL
ENVELOPE
ALTITUDE

DECELERATION

FUEL FLOW
SCHEDULE

IGNITION STABLE
ENVELOPE

FLAMEOUT

MACH NO. ENGINE SPEED

7
COMBUSTION PROCESS
10
6
4 R ich flam m ability lim it

E qu ivalen ce R atio, 
2
F la m m a b le
m ist F la m m a b le S p o n ta n e o u s
1.0 va p o r ig n itio n
0.6
0.4 L ea n f la m m
a b ilit y lim it
0.2 Flash p oin t

0.1
50 10 0 15 0 20 0 250
T (C )

• PROBLEM: want low  (<1); can easily by 0.5


SOLUTION: locally rich mixture that’s burned then diluted and
cooled to acceptable Tt4
• PROBLEM: want stationary flame within a moving flow
SOLUTION: Recirculating region at front of combustor, or “flame 8
holders” in AB
COMBUSTION PROCESS
(Ignition)

• Requires fuel/air mixture be within flammability


limits
• Sufficient residence time
• Ignition source in vicinity of combustible mixture
– If mixture is below Spontaneous Ignition
Temperature (SIT), an ignition source is
required to bring temp up to SIT (Spark Plug)
– Ignition energy - fig 10-68
 const  1
– Ignition Delay tign  exp , 
 T  P 9
COMBUSTION PROCESS
(Stability)
• Ability of the combustion process to sustain itself
• PROBLEMS: Too lean or too rich
– Temp & reaction rates drop below that required to heat
and vaporize the fuel/air mixture
• CLP (Combustion Loading Parameter)
– Indication of stability based on mass flow, pressure (n
= 1.8 for typical fuels), and combustor volume

Unstable
m
CLP  
P n Vol  Stable
Unstable

10
CLP
COMBUSTION PROCESS
(Stability - CLP)
• Gives an estimate of combustor length
L  Vref t res
t 3A ref t res
 L

m Aref
2"

Vave = Vref
m

L: distance required for combustion to be completed


Aref: cross-sectional area normal to airflow 1

t3: approximate density of air entering combustor  t 3  Pt 3


 c

t res  Pt3 n

11
COMBUSTION PROCESS
(Stability - CLP)
 c 1 

Pt 3 c
A4
Eq. 10-31: L  t res Note: this equation needs to be corrected
Tt 4 A ref in your book

Design of “new” combustor based on “old” designs (Table 10-5)

Known Similar Reference New Design


F100: L = 18.5 in
Pt3r
D = 25 in L  Const
Tt 4
Pt3 = 366 psia
  c  1
Tt4max = 3025 R where r  n 
  c 
 c 1
c
Pt 3
L  const Pt3n Thus: the length of main burners
Tt 4 12
varies with pressure and temperature
COMBUSTION PROCESS
(Total Pressure Loss)
• Heat interaction (Rayleigh Loss) + Friction/Drag (Fanno Loss)
1 2
q = cpeTte - cpiTti Drag   i i CDA
V
2

Vi D Ve
Tti Tte
i e
q
Cont: Vi i  Vee
i Vi2 eVe2 1
Mom: Pi   Pe   i Vi2CD
gc gc 2
13
Energy: q = c peTte - c pi Tti
COMBUSTION PROCESS
(Total Pressure Loss)
Tt4 q  c p3Tt3
• Solution to these 1.
Tt3

c p4 Tt3
3 equations:   1 2
 3 M 32 1  3 M3 
exit, e  4 2.  =  2  Tt4
 
2
inlet, i  3  4 1 +  3 M 32 1  CD  Tt3
• Equations 10-35 thru 3. M 42 
2
10-38 on page 823 1 - 2 4   1 - 2 4  1

P
4. 4 

1 +  3 M 32 1 
CD
2 
P3 1   4 M 42
4
1   4  1 2   4 1
M4 
Pt4 P4  2 
5.  3  1
Pt3 P3
1   3  1 M 2   3 1
 3 14
 2 
COMBUSTION PROCESS
(Total Pressure Loss)

1 .0 0 1 .0

0 .9 5 0 .8 0

Pte / Pti 0 .9 0 0 .6

or Me or M4
0 .8 5 0 .4
Pt4 / Pt3
0 .8 0 0 .2

0 .7 5 0 .0
0 0 .0 5 0 .1 0 .1 5 0 .2 0 .2 5 0 .3

Mi or M3

15
COMBUSTOR DIFFUSER
(Total Pressure Loss)
3
Set by Compressor Blade Height
2
1
A1 A2 A3

smooth-wall
diffuser

step (dump)
diffuser
Smooth-Wall Dump

 
 2 2
 A1 
M1 1  1  A 2  2 6 
Pt 2 2  Pt 3     A   A  
 1 
2
 exp  M 2 1  2
  1  2
 
Pt1 Pt 2  2  A   A 3 
1    1 M 2   1  3  
 2 1 16
COMBUSTOR DESIGN ITERATION

• Estimate the combustor geometry


– Check Combustion Stability (at all flight conditions)
– Determine Combustion Efficiency (at all flight
conditions)
– Calculate Space Rate Heat Release (at all flight
conditions)
– Determine Combustor Reference Velocity (at all flight
conditions)
• NEXT: Modify design based on the above
calculations and typical/target values

17
Main Burner Areas, Heights, and Velocities

V ref rm
A ref

A comb
ro V comb ~ 30 ft/s

A pass
ri V pass~ 150 ft/s
Main Burner Height, H

m 3a H = ro - ri
Aref = Apass + Acomb Vref  Aref
 t 3 Aref H
2  r18m
COMBUSTOR DESIGN ITERATION
• Assume the following “typical” combustor geometry
– Primary Combustor Volume, 3.5 ft3 ( Acomb*Lcomb)
– Combustor Reference Area, Aref = (rt2 - rh2) = 5 ft2
– Dome Height, H = rt - rh = 7 in
– Total Combustor Volume, Vol = 7.0 ft3
rt

V ref
H = rt-rh
A ref
Acomb

Primary Volume
Combustor Volume
rh
(includes Primary)
19
Lmb = Ldiff + Lcomb
COMBUSTOR DESIGN ITERATION

• Can calculate from performance data the following:


– Combustor Efficiency, b
– Check Stability by plotting CLP vs 
– Calculate Space Rate or Space Heat Release Rate -- measure of
intensity of energy release
– Calculate the Reference Velocity, Vref
• Review literature to determine acceptable values for
the above parameters then adjust the design choices
such as Volumes, Areas, and Height. 20
COMBUSTOR EFFICIENCY
(reaction rate parameter)

Tt 3
1.75
P Aref e H
 
b
where b  382 2  ln / 1.03
t3
 .
x 10 5
m3 21
"" when   1.03 "" when   1.03
COMBUSTOR STABILITY (CLP)

m

CLP 
n
P Vol  22
SPACE HEAT RELASE (SR) and
REFERENCE VELOCITY (Vref)

 f AB hPR 3600
m
SR 
Pt (Vol ) AB

.
m3
Vref 
 t 3 Aref

23
Main Burner Lengths and Mass Flow Rates
Ldiff = Lsm +Ldump Lcomb

Ldiff

local = /50%
m 3a*50%
Primary Com b
Zone

3c Passage
3b
m 3a *50%
m 3a
3a

Lmb
Pt3r Volmb = 0.8Lmb*Aref
Lmb = Ldiff + Lcomb Lmb  const
Tt 4 24
Volcomb = Lcomb*Acomb
Afterburner Design Requirements

*Large temperature rise


*Low dry loss (non-AB thrust)
*Wide temperature modulation (throttle)
*High combustion efficiency
*Short length; light weight
*Altitude light-off capability
*No acoustic combustion instabilities
*Long life, low cost, easy repair
25
Afterburners
Components:
• Diffuser
• Spray Ring
• Flame Holder
• Cooling Liner
• Screech Liner
• Variable Throat Nozzle

26
Afterburners - Components
Diffuser Combustion Section

Zone 4 fuel spray ring


Zone 3 fuel spray ring
Zone 2 fuel spray ring

Fan flow Splitter cone Flame holder

Core flow Cooling Liner

Zone 2 fuel Zone 1 fuel Diffuser cone


spray ring spray ring Linear perforated

Linear louvered

Station 6 Station 7

27
Afterburners - Components

Spray Ring
Flame Holder
V2
Diffuser H
d Recirculating Zone
W
L

Mixing Zone

28
Diffuser
• Balance between low total pressure loss
during combustion (loss Mach no) and
AB cross-sectional area (no larger than
largest diameter upstream)

• Short diffuser to reduce AB length with low


total pressure loss

• Analysis - same as combustor diffuser


29
Spray Ring - Injection, Atomization,
Vaporization, & Ignition
• Injection: core stream first (high temp)
spray
ring

Fuel is injected
perpendicular to air stream &
ripped into micron-sized droplets (atomized).
Fuel is vaporized then ignited prior to
being trapped in downstream flameholder

• Ignition: spark or arc igniter


pilot burner 30
Flame Holder - Flame Stabilization
V2
• Two main types d
– V-gutter Flame Holders Recirculating Zone
W
– Pilot burners L
Flame Holder
Mixing Zone
• Bluff body that generates a low-speed mixing
region just downstream of fuel injection
– high local equivalence ratio (~ 1)
– 2 zones: 1) Mixing - turbulent flow with very high shear
sharp temp gradients and vigorous chemical reactions;
2) Recirculating - strong recirculation, low reaction rates
and temps very near stoiciometric 31
Cooling and Screech Liner
• Cooling
– Isolates the very high temperatures from outer casing. In F119
all the fan air is used to cool the AB and Nozzle during
AB operation.
• Screech
– Attenuates high frequency oscillations associated with
combustion instability (high heat release rates)
– 200-20000 Hz,high heat loading & vibratory stresses
Rumble

Alt

Screech Regime
32
M
Variable Nozzle

• MFP - applied at Nozzle throat, M8 = 1

m
 8 Tt 8
A8 
Pt 8MFP( M8 )

33
Single Flameholder Design

Dmax= 35 in

d V2
V1 W H
L
1, i e
Inlet Conditions (Typical) Flameholder Geometry (Choice)
Pt1 = 40 psia  = 1.33 half angle,  = 30 deg
Tt1 =1750 R d = 3.5 in
m = 200 lbm/s local = 0.8
Exit Conditions (Typical)
Tte = 3800 R 2 = 1.3
fAB = 0.035 34
Design Calculations
m
 1 Tt1
1. Find M1 MFP( M1 ) 
Pt1A1

2. Check for flame stability for local = 0.8


Tt1 Pt1
T1  P1 
  1 1 2    1 1 2 
1
( 1 1)
1  M1  1  M1 
 2   2 
Eq. 10-53 and Fig 10-89
k ()
Characteristic ignition time, tc t c ref  2.5
Pref Tref
2.5
k () t c ref Pref Tref
tc  2.5

PT PT 2.5
35
Design Calculations (cont’d)
L
2. Flame stability (cont’d) eq 10-51: tc 
V2c
want something in terms of V1c, H, and tc, where V1c
is the maximum entrance velocity for a stable flame
 V1c tc  V1c L W  V1  L  W 
        eq 10  54
 H  Blowout H V2c W  V2  W  H 

V1 W are functions of flameholder blockage


,
V2 H ratio, B = d/H - see Table 10-7
L
4
W
Solve for V1c above and compare to V1  M1  1RT1g c
If V1c > V1, the flame will not blow out 36
Design Calculations (cont’d)
3. Total Pressure Drop (AB) - Target Values: Fig 10-90
Diffuser: combination of smooth wall & dump
- same approach as main combustor diffuser
using equations 10-42a&b and 10-43

Rayleigh + Fanno: CD & Tte/Tti


- Tte/Tti is given from calculations (Perf)
- CD is estimated using equation 10-57
2
V 
C D  B 2 
 V1 
- Use equations 10-35 thru 10-38 to determine
pressure ratio due to Rayleigh & Fanno losses
37
Design Calculations (cont’d)

4. Total Afterburner Length - Based on Fig 10-92

5. Space Heat Release Rate, SR


 f AB hPR 3600
m
SR 
Pt (Vol ) AB

Vol = (total length x AB cross-sectional area)


Desired value near 8 x 106 Btu/(hr ft3 atm)

38
Combustion Chemistry
- General Fuel-to-Air Stoichiometric Equation
 y z  y z y  y z
C x H y Oz   x   O2  3.76 x    N 2  xCO2  H 2O  3.76 x    N 2
 4 2  4 2 2  4 2

m fuel 12 x  1y  16 z
f stoich  
mair  y z
 x   32  3.76  28.16
 4 2

- Simple Approximation for Heating Value of the Fuel


(Hill and Peterson, p. 221)
H
hPR  15,900  15,800    in BTU
C lb m
H 1.008  m
where  for Hydrocarbon C n H m
C 12.01  n

39
Combustion Chemistry
Fuel Heating Value (Btu/lbm) Estimate (Btu/lbm)
JP4 (CH2.02) 18,4001 18,579
Propane (C3H8) 19,9442 19,436
Methane (CH4) 21,5182 21,203

Liquid Hydrogen 51,5932


(Equation not Valid)

1
EGTP, pg 827
2
Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers, pg 4-29, table 4.1.6

40
Combustion Chemistry
- Non-Reacting Mixtures-
Basic Equations Applied Equations
k
mass: m m   mi
i 1
1.9857117 (Btu/lbmole R)
R
k 28.97 - f  0.946186lbm /lb mole 
Mole Number : N m  N i C p  A0  A1T  A2T 2  A3T 3  A4T 4
i 1
 A5T 5  A6T 6  A7T 7
k k
C pair  f  C pprod
Mass Fraction: mfi   mfi ,  mfi  1 C pm 
i 1 i 1 1 f
1
k  R 
Ni   1  m 
Mole Fraction:  i  ,  i  1  C pm 
Nm i 1

k
Mass: mi  N i M i ; m m    i M i
i 1
-Coefficients for Cp equation given in
Ru Table 2-4 (pg 106) Mattingly
Gas Constant: R m 
Mm
-Variation in properties given in
Figures 6-1 and 6-2 41
Combustion Chemistry
- Variation with Temp-

Cp versus Temp for JP-4  versus Temp for JP-4

0.36 1.42
f=0
1.4 f = 0.02
0.34 f = 0.04
1.38 f = 0.06
f = 0.0676
0.32
1.36
Cp (Btu/lbmR)

0.3 1.34


0.28 1.32

1.3
0.26 f=0
f = 0.02 1.28
f = 0.04
0.24 f = 0.06 1.26
f = 0.0676
0.22 1.24
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500
Temp (R) Temp (R)

42
Design Example
For the information given on the 1st slide, find the following:

1. M1 and V1

2. V1c (check stability)

3. Pressure ratio due to Rayleigh and Fanno losses

4. AB length

5. SR

43
COMBUSTION PROCESS
(Total Pressure Loss)

Example: What is the pressure ratio across the


burner for the following conditions:
Pt4/Pt3

1. Tt4/Tt3 = 3.0 and CD = 0 (No Drag)

2. Tt4/Tt3 = 1 and CD = 2.0 (No q)

3. Tt4/Tt3 = 3.0 and CD = 2.0 (Both Drag and q)

44
COMBUSTOR DIFFUSER
(Total Pressure Loss)
Station 1 to 2 (smooth-wall, sm) Set by Compressor Blade Height

2
1
Given:  = 0.9, A1/A3 = 0.20
Hsm
M1 = 0.5
Pick: A1/A2 = ________
Lsm
Find: Pt2/Pt1 = __________ (Use Eq 9.17b)
M2 = _______ (Use MFP)
3
Lsm/Hsm = ___________ (Use Fig 9.8)
Station 2 to 3 (Dump)
Calc: A2/A3 = ________ 2 HD

Find: Pt3/Pt2 = __________ (Use Eq 9.18)


M3 = ___________ (Use MFP) LD  HD
45
Overall Pressure Ratio of Diffuser, Pt3/Pt1: _________

You might also like