0% found this document useful (0 votes)
143 views37 pages

Urban Finance Challenges in India

The document discusses the current status of urban local body finances in India. It notes that India is urbanizing rapidly which will put immense pressure on existing infrastructure. It highlights gaps in service levels for water supply, sewerage, and solid waste management compared to national benchmarks. The municipal sector in India is small in size resulting in insufficient resources. Cities also lack autonomy as they are more financed through national resources than locally raised own revenues. There is a lack of buoyancy in own revenues and untapped potential from property taxes. Unprecedented project-based devolution has also occurred with no concern for financial sustainability.

Uploaded by

Unmesh Rajguru
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
143 views37 pages

Urban Finance Challenges in India

The document discusses the current status of urban local body finances in India. It notes that India is urbanizing rapidly which will put immense pressure on existing infrastructure. It highlights gaps in service levels for water supply, sewerage, and solid waste management compared to national benchmarks. The municipal sector in India is small in size resulting in insufficient resources. Cities also lack autonomy as they are more financed through national resources than locally raised own revenues. There is a lack of buoyancy in own revenues and untapped potential from property taxes. Unprecedented project-based devolution has also occurred with no concern for financial sustainability.

Uploaded by

Unmesh Rajguru
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Urban Local Body Finances

Current Status, Sustainability and Role on Economic Development

Astha Agarwalla
FPM (IIM-A)
Associate Dean, Faculty of Management Sciences, Adani University
Cities, like states, must compete with each other to unleash dynamism.
To competitive federalism India must add competitive sub-federalism

- Economic Survey 2016-17


India is urbanizing rapidly…
Are we behind?
Country Level of
Urbanization in
2011 (%)
India 31
Indonesia 45
China 48
Mexico 78
Korea 83
Brazil 87

Source: United nations and Govt.


of India
India is urbanizing rapidly… This is equal to sum of current
total populations of France, U.K.
and Ukraine together !

And a little more than Mexico!

India will overtake China as


world’s most populous country
next year!

Source: UN Population Projections

According to European
Commission’s measure, based on
Satellite imagery, in 2015, 63% of
India’s population lived in an
urban area*
*(defined as continuous grid cells of at least
15000 inhabitants per sq. km. or a density
of built-up greater than 50% and a
minimum of 50,000 inhabitants)
Status of Urban Services in India
• Drinking water availability within the premises is 71.2%
• 32.7% of urban population has access to piped sewer system;
• Average duration of water supply ranges from 1-6 hours;
• 21% of waste water is treated;
• Waste collection efficiency ranges between 70% and 90% in major
Metro cities
• Segregation of solid waste is around 30%
• Organized public transport system operational in 65 Class I cities
• BRTS and Metro projects are operational in various Mega and
Metropolitan cities
Some snapshots
Number of Citi es
Urban Populati on (in
9000
8000
7935 Million)
7000
6000 700 600
5161
5000 600
4000 500
400 377
3000
2000
Populati on in other 300
1000 citi es and towns 200
0 100
2001 2011 400 0
343 2011 2031
300
217
200
100

Metropolitan citi es 0
2011 2031 Populati on in met-
100 87
ropolitan citi es (in
80 Million)
60 50 A larger increase 300
250
200 160
255

40
20 expected in non- 150
100
50
0
2011 2031 metro cities ! 0
2011 2031
This means immense pressure on existing
infrastructure and a dire need to create more!
As per the High Powered Committee of Urban Infrastructure (HPEC) report, Investment for
urban infrastructure over the 20 year period – Rs. 39.2 lakh crore (Rs. 39 trillion = $ 487
billion)
India’s current GDP is $3.5 trillion (Rs 280 lakh crore)

We need to invest almost 12-13% of GDP in Urban infrastructure


related capital expenditure over next 20 years, i.e. 0.65% GDP per
year

McKinsey Report (2010) has estimated an investment requirement of Rs. 53.1 lakh crore
Service Level Service Indicators
Water Supply
National Benchmark India Status

Gaps Per Capita Supply of water


Extent of metering of water connections
135 lpcd
100%
69 lpcd
13%

•Source: Service levels in Extent of non-revenue water 20% 32%


Urban Water and Sanitation Cost recovery in water supply service 100% 39%
Sector – Status Report (2010- Sewerage
11), Ministry of Urban Coverage of toilets 100% 70%
Development Collection Efficiency of the sewage 100% 10%
network
SWM
Household level coverage 100% 35%
Extent of scientific disposal of municipal 100% 10%
solid waste
Strom water drainage
Coverage of storm water drainage 100% 46%
network
Important role for the Local
Governments, unprecedented
requirements of funds and
responsibilities

Current Status of Municipal Finances


Insufficiency
• Smaller size of urban sector in India
Issues in Indian Urban
Finance
Lack of autonomy
• Cities financed through national resources than locally raised resources

Lack of buoyancy and own effort


• Lower share of own revenue
• Untapped revenue potential from Property Tax

Lack of accountability
• Absence of Financial Accountability Framework

Unprecedented Project based devolution


• with no concern for financial Sustainability
• Cities not able to absorb and devolve funds
Insufficiency
Municipal
Sector in India
•Source: State of Municipal
Finances, Report by ICRIER for
the 15th Finance Commission
Municipal Sector in India – Small in size
(insufficient Resources)
Municipal Revenue as % of GDP (Select Countries, OECD,
2012)
16

13.9 14.2
14

12

10

8 7.4
6
6
4.5
4

0
Poland South Africa Brazil U.K. Norway
Local government revenue as % of Total govenrment
revenues

25

20.72
20

17.43
15.87
15
13.42
12.15
10.55 10.61
10

5.21 5.58
5 4.31
3.07

0
Australia Austria Brazil Canada Germany Mexico South Africa Spain Switzerland USA India
Lack of autonomy
Transfers as % of total revenue

60

54.23
50

41.8
40

33.8 34.5

30 28.9
24.9

20
16.3
13.5 13.9
10

0
Australia Austria Canada Germany South Africa Spain Switzerland China India
90
83.3 83.5 83.7

80
74.5

70
63.7
62 62
60 58.5
54.3 54.8
51.9
50.1
50
46.5
44.2 44.5
39.5
40
33.6 33.7
29.7 30.7
30

20 17.8
13.8
10.1
10

0
ab ra at m sh a u a a la ur rh ka al h sh r d al sh an a ir
nj ht jar sa de Go ad yan r iss ra ip ga ta ng des de Bi
ha an ch de th ir p
ur hm
Pu as
Gu As ra iln r O Ke an s na Be a a kh an a as as
ar P m Ha M ha
tti
Ka
r
es
t P r
lP
r ar ar P r
Ra
j T K
ah hr
a Ta ya ha Jh Utt ar &
M d Ch W h c tt u
n ad m
a U
m
m
A M Hi Ja
Lack of buoyancy and own effort
Share of own income and per capita
own income (Lack of effort)
• Revenue expenditure is proxy for service level
Expenditure
Per capita revenue expenditure
1400

1253.71

1200

1008.1
1000 955.439999999999

865.1

800

604.14
600

sh m ha
r
ar
h a ra
t na sh ir nd ka la sh ra ur sa ab an du ra sh al al
e
d508.8 ss
a i Go a a e m a ta r a e ht i p i s nj th a u e c h n g
ra A B sg
Gu
j ry ra
d
as
h
rk
h
na Ke493.1Pra
d
ra
s an Or Pu ja
s iln481.76Trip ra
d
an Be 487.4
P
ha
tti Ha P K a a r a M a m P a r t
400
a
r h ha
l & 392.69 Jh K 418.27 ya 427.66 ah R Ta ar Utt 399.71 es
ndh C 376.07 a c m
u
a dh M 355.06
390.3
U tt
356.75
W
A m m
Hi Ja M
255.23 275.18
200 211.79

87.2 87.2 81.03


0
Salaries and wages as % of total expenditure
100

90 87.73 87.88
80.41
80 76.64
70.00 69.71
70 65.21 65.18
63.26 63.77
60.64 60.00
60 56.49
54.38
49.94 50.27 50.58
50 48.51
45.60
42.66 42.66 40.82
40
33.27
30

20

10

es
h m ha
r
ar
h a at a
es
h ir d
ak
a la es
h ra pu
r sa b an du ra sh al al
d sa i sg Go ja
r
ry
an d m an t ra d ht i r is nja th a ip
u de c h ng
a As B u a sh kh a Ke a a s an O Pu ja
s iln Tr ra n Be
Pr tti G Ha Pr Ka ar rn Pr ar M a m P a ra t
a ha a l & Jh Ka a ah R Ta ar Utt es
hr h h u hy
d C ac m d M Utt W
An m m a
Hi Ja M
Own sources revenue - Salaries and wages
1000

811.58
800

600
520.929999999999

414.94
400

217.5
200 144.26
119.1 123.2
83.34
58.35
15.2 29.87 14.9
2.3 2.3
0
sh am ha
r rh a ra
t na h ir d a la sh tra ur
-20.5
sa ab an du ra sh al al
de ss Bi ga Go ja ya es m an t ak ra e h ip is j h a u e ch n g
ra A s
Gu
r ra
d s h
rk
h a K e
ra
d
ra
s an Or Pu
n st iln Tr
ip ra
d-85.6 an
Be-101.9
aP
tti Ha l P -141.54 Ka ha ar
n P a M aja m P ar -141.21 t
-200
r ha a & J K a ah
-155.19 R -166.2 Ta r
Utt es
d h Ch ac
h u d hy M U tt a W
m
An im m M
a -254.62
H Ja -296.31
-400
Problems
• Cash based accounting
• High establishment costs – staff intensive activities
• Inefficiency in tax collection
• Increasing reliance on user charges
• Property tax collection ratio – 50-55%
Untapped potential of Property Tax
Untapped potential of Property Tax
Per capita property tax of
Indian states
•In India, state govt. decides the Property tax base, whereas in
Russia, China and South Africa, National Government decides the
base; Brazil local govt. decides the base
Issues with Property Tax
Potential to increase property taxes

Illustration to assess PT As per As per 2018 As per 2018


potential 2010 Cap guideline market
value value value
Market value (building) Rs./sq/ 6456 23,200 41426
mt •In ULBs in Karnataka, although
Taxable capital value of land 1,37,000 3,50,000 the property tax fixation basis was
Taxable capital value of building 3,22,800 11,60,000 20,71,300 changed to capital value, property
Depreciation value of building 3,228 1,31,788 2,52,698.6 taxes continue to be fixed on the
Taxable capital value of the 3,19,572 10,28,212 18,18,601 basis of 2018 Guideline values
building after depreciation instead the prevalent Guideline or
Taxable capital value of land + 4,56,772 13,78,212 18,18,601 market values. CRIS analysis
building after depreciation (illustration below) suggests that
Property Tax Rs. 3,090 10,061 13403 revision to the 2018 Guideline
Upside Potential - 225% 333% value by itself could lead to
doubling of property taxes
Issues – ULBs not augmenting their
own resources
• Property tax potential unexploited – Economic survey of India 2017-18
• Evidence from satellite data indicates that Bengaluru and Jaipur collect only
between 5% to 20% of their potential property taxes

• Property tax revenue – 0.16% to 0.24% of GDP much lower compared


to developing countries average of 0.6% of GDP and developed
countries average of 2% GDP

• Properties paying tax to total properties – 56%, collection efficiency –


37% of demand, cities collected only 21% of their potential property tax
The 15th Finance Commission and Urban Local Bodies
• Substantive increase in funds to cities – Rs. 1.55 lakh crore over a five year period from 21-26, is a 78%
increase over grants during the 14th FC.

• 100% outcome funding of Rs. 38000 crore for 50 million plus urban agglomerations, with an aggregate
population of 150 million, tied to performance indicators on air quality, water and sanitation

• Condition to publish audited annual accounts and notification of floor rates for property tax
applicable to every municipality

• Deadline of March 24 set for states to strengthen State Finance Commission and table action taken
reports in state legislatures

• All Service level benchmarks, annual accounts to be published on national platform for municipal
finance
Best Practices – resource mobilization
• Increasing municipal revenues
• Property tax improvements
• Self-assessment system, rate revision
• Physical survey of properties, verification at registration
• Water charge collections

• Critical success factors


• Leadership
• Computerization and comparing databases – private expert support
• Restructuring the revenue department
• Training staff and building capacity of local officials
Best Practices – maintenance of statistics
• Amendment to Karanataka Municipal Accounting Manual - to generate finance
and account database
• State level nodal agency – dedicated local teams
• Project partners – all ULBs, parastatals, State govt. agencies
• Centralized database, control
• Sound database of all properties
• GIS mapping, digitized ward/block level maps
• Increased revenues, accountability, identification of fixed assets
Best Practices – Accrual accounting, audit, transparency

• Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation


• First to implement National Municipal Accounting Manual Suggestions
• Accrual based, Double entry system
• Computerized accounting and budgeting
• Financial Management
Other best practices
• Optimization of property tax collection using GIS – Hassan Municipal
Corporation, Karnataka
• Regularization of water connections to augment revenues – Nagpur
Municipal Corporation
• Adoption of transparency and audit measures through E-Governance –
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation
• Public Record of operations and finance – Bangalore Municipal
Corporation
• 24 hour control room for addressing public grievances – Hubli-Dharwad
Municipal Corporation
Observations
• Leadership based initiatives – not institutionalized
• State level policy and governance framework a major enabler
• Growing partnership among ULBs, Para-statals, and other public
sector agencies operating in the urban areas
Defining Financial Sustainability
• Sustainability – capacity to endure
• No consensus on precise definition
• Fiscal sustainability – the ability of a government to sustain
• Its current spending, tax and other policies in the long run, without
• Threatening government solvency or defaulting on some of its liabilities or
promised expenditure
Principles of Sustainable Municipal Finance
Economic
Efficiency

Ease and cost


Equity
of
(Fairness)
administration

Principles

Autonomy Accountability

Adequacy and
stability

Common questions

Powered by AI

Barriers to fiscal sustainability in Indian urban municipalities include insufficient revenue generation, high reliance on national resources, lack of financial autonomy, and inefficiencies in tax collection . Strategies to overcome these challenges involve enhancing local revenue generation through improved property tax systems, increasing municipal autonomy by allowing cities to raise and manage their own funds, and employing efficient tax collection strategies . Further, adopting robust financial management practices, ensuring accountability, and increasing transparency through accrual accounting can strengthen the fiscal frameworks of urban municipalities, promoting long-term sustainability .

The municipal finance initiatives, such as increasing the property tax revenue and implementing accrual accounting, are effective steps toward enhancing urban infrastructure investment . The 15th Finance Commission’s allocation of Rs. 1.55 lakh crore over five years marks a significant increase designed to boost city finances . Additionally, the push for publishing audited accounts and floor rates for property tax contributes to transparency and accountability. These initiatives, coupled with targeted outcome funding for air quality, water, and sanitation, align fiscal policies with infrastructure development goals, thus effectively addressing urban investment needs .

In 2011, India's level of urbanization was 31%, which was significantly lower than China (48%), Indonesia (45%), and far behind countries like Brazil (87%) and Mexico (78%). This relatively low level of urbanization implies that India has significant potential for urban growth, which will intensify the pressure on its urban infrastructure. The country's rapid urbanization is expected to require substantial investment to meet the infrastructure needs, as outlined in the McKinsey Report's estimate of Rs. 53.1 lakh crore [$487 billion] over 20 years .

Strategies for improving municipal revenue in Indian cities include enhancing property tax systems through self-assessment and rate revisions, along with conducting physical surveys and property verification at registration . Improving water charge collections and utilizing GIS for tax optimization have also been suggested. Furthermore, restructuring revenue departments, training staff, and building local officials' capacities are emphasized as critical success factors. Computerization and database comparison, supported by private expertise, further augment resource mobilization and administration efficiency .

Leadership initiatives are critical for the financial sustainability of urban local bodies as they drive strategic decision-making, resource optimization, and policy implementation . Effective leadership can instigate reforms in municipal finance by fostering innovation in revenue generation, enhancing organizational capacity, and ensuring transparency and accountability. However, these initiatives must be institutionalized to have a lasting impact, as current efforts are often tied to specific leaders rather than structural changes. Strong leadership, combined with supportive governance frameworks, facilitates partnerships and collaboration among ULBs, para-statal bodies, and public agencies, enhancing financial sustainability and service delivery .

The property tax system in Indian cities has significant untapped potential, as evidenced by cities like Bengaluru and Jaipur collecting only 5% to 20% of their potential property taxes . Additionally, property tax revenue in India is just 0.16% to 0.24% of GDP, much lower than the average of 0.6% for developing countries and 2% for developed ones . Addressing these inefficiencies by revising property tax bases and improving collection efficiency could substantially increase municipal revenues, enabling better urban infrastructure and services .

The projected urban population growth in India is expected to increase from 377 million in 2011 to 600 million by 2031 . This dramatic growth will place immense pressure on existing infrastructure and requires substantial investment. Economic projections indicate a need for an investment of approximately Rs. 39.2 lakh crore ($487 billion) over 20 years to meet the infrastructure demands . This necessitates an annual investment equivalent to about 0.65% of current GDP, underscoring the urgency for strategic planning and financial mobilization to sustain urban development .

Indian urban finance faces challenges including insufficiency of resources, lack of autonomy, and lack of buoyancy and own effort. Cities are largely financed through national resources rather than locally raised funds, limiting local autonomy . Revenue generation is hindered by low utilization of property tax potential and inefficiencies in tax collection. This reliance on national resources inhibits cities from developing sustainable financial systems, thereby affecting their ability to effectively leverage resources for development projects .

Local governance plays a pivotal role in addressing service level gaps in urban water and sanitation services by ensuring the efficient allocation of resources and implementing comprehensive policies. Current service levels in India show significant gaps: the per capita supply of water is 69 lpcd compared to the national benchmark of 135 lpcd, and sewage network collection efficiency is only 10% . Effective local governance can drive improvements through strategic planning, investment in infrastructure, enhancing service delivery mechanisms, and leveraging technology for better monitoring and accountability . Addressing these gaps requires robust governance frameworks that focus on sustainability and community involvement.

Implementing accrual accounting and transparency practices in urban local bodies (ULBs) is crucial for ensuring accurate financial reporting and improving accountability. Accrual accounting provides a more comprehensive view of financial health by recognizing economic events regardless of when cash transactions occur . Transparency practices, such as e-governance and public records of operations, foster trust and allow for better financial management . These practices also facilitate the identification of fixed assets, enable better decision-making, and enhance the municipality's ability to attract investments, ultimately leading to improved service delivery .

You might also like