Operations Management
Lecture 3: Just in Time
Dr. Gyan Prakash
Backdrop
Just in Time (JIT)
Japanese firms, particularly Toyota, in 1970's and 1980's
Geographical and cultural roots
Country of many islands – poor in natural resources
Focus on relationships
Japanese objectives after second world war
“catch up with America” (within 3 years of 1945)
provide small lots of many models
Japanese motivation
Japanese domestic production in 1949 – trucks: 25622, cars: 1,008
American to Japanese productivity ratio – 9 :1
Industries were witnessing “slow growth” in 1970's.
Toyota Production System
Pillars
Just-in-time,
Autonomation, automation with a human touch (machine will stop in case of problems)
Practices
setup reduction Single-Minute Exchange of Die (SMED)
worker training cross-trained multi-skilled workers
vendor relations long-term
ensuring quality at source
fool proofing (baka-yoke) mistake proofing (poka-yoke)
Insuring error free operations or identifying error immediately
…
Motivation: Supermarket Stimulus
Build from insights from supermarket:
Customers get only what they need
Stock replenished quickly
But, who holds inventory?
Inventory is on the move and replenished frequently
Frequent Deliveries
Inventory level
One type of item in one delivery
Inventory level
JIT model: Various types of items in one
delivery
Zero Inventories
Platonic Ideal
Zero Inventories connotes a level of perfection not ever attainable in a production process.
Concept of a high level of manufacturing excellence
Stimulates a quest for constant improvement
Metaphorical Writing:
– Shingo 1990
5W = 1H
(who, when, where, what and why) why, why, why, why, why and how)
JIT material flow
buffer inventory to
maintain smooth
Traditional approach flow of production
buffer buffer
inventory inventory
stage A stage B stage C
Use of signals for
JIT approach need based
material flows
orders orders
stage A stage B stage C
deliveries deliveries
Adapted from Slack, Chambers and
JIT and capacity utilization
focus on producing
Traditional approach
only when needed
focus on high JIT approach
capacity utilization leading to lean
fewer stoppages
more stoppages lower capacity
because of utilization, but low inventory so
problems
problems are
more production
high inventory exposed and
at each stage
means less chance solved
of problems being
exposed and solved no surplus
production goes
extra production
into inventory
goes into inventory
because of continuing
stoppages at stages
Adapted from Slack, Chambers and
The 5 S’s
Sort (Seiri) Eliminate what is not needed and keep
what is needed.
Set (Seiton) Position things in such a way that they
can be easily reached whenever they are needed.
Shine (Seiso) Keep things clean and tidy; no waste
or dirt in the work area.
Standardize (Seiketsu) Maintain cleanliness and
order – perpetual neatness.
Sustain (Shitsuke) Develop a commitment and pride
in keeping to standards.
The Seven Zeros
Zero Defects: avoid delays due to defects. (Quality at the source)
Zero (Excess) Lot Size: avoid “waiting inventory” delays (develop a lot size of one.)
Zero Setups: minimize setup delay and facilitate small lot sizes.
Zero Breakdowns: avoid stopping, machine failures/repair are planned.
Zero (Excess) Handling: reduce material movement from work station to work station.
Zero Lead Time: ensure rapid replenishment of parts (very close to the core of the zero
inventories objective).
Zero Surging: parts are produced as needed without WIP buffers.
JIT Small Machines Approach
The conventional western approach was to use large machines to get
‘economies of scale’.
But long, complex set-ups, big-batches, create ‘waste’.
Use of several small machines allows simultaneous processing
robust and is more flexible
requires fewer set-ups
quick set-up
flexible scheduling options
cheaper tooling
planned maintenance easier
fewer set-ups needed
Emphasise flexibility and economies of scope
Adapted from Slack, Chambers and
The Environment as a Control
Environment as control Western approaches JIT approaches
Machine setup times High Reduction in set up time
Vendor deliveries EOQ Long-term relation with frequent
deliveries
Quality levels Inspection-scrap, rework Quality at source
Production schedule Wagner-Whitin model Customer due dates are negotiated,
integration of marketing and manufac.
Product designs Given design Manufacturer and engineering work
together to design what is practical
By improving the environment manufacturing system can be made much easier to manage .
Implementing JIT
Careful restructuring of production environment
Production Smoothing:
relatively constant volumes
relatively constant product mix
Mixed Model Production Scheduling (Heijunka):
Smoothing aggregate production requirements
Sequencing final assembly
Master Production Schedule (MPS) Final Assembly Schedule (FAS)
MPS- production volume:10,000 per month (20 working days)
FAS- 500 per day (2 shifts), 250 per shift (480 minutes)
1 unit every 1.92 minutes ---- Takt time
Production of discrete parts – fairly steady rate
Repetitive Manufacturing– basis for Kanban
Implementing JIT …
Translation of MPS Final Assembly Schedule (daily rates)
Product specific requirements production sequence
Assume you are making A,B,C with:
Mix of 50% A, 25% B, 25% C in daily production of 500 units
0.50 500 = 250 units of A
0.25 500 = 125 units of B
0.25 500 = 125 units of C
A–B–A–C–A–B–A–C–A–B–A–C–A–B–A–C…
Production sequence
Inherent Inflexibility of JIT
JIT results in many inflexibilities:
Stable volume
Stable mix
Precise sequence
Rapid (instant?) replenishment
Measures to Promote Flexibility:
Capacity buffers
Setup reduction
Cross training
Plant layout
Measures to Promote Flexibility:
Capacity Buffers
Buffer Capacity:
Protection against quota shortfalls/stock outs
Regular flow allows matching with customer demands
Planned down time preventive maintenance or catch-up
Two shifting
4 – 8 – 4 – 8 (eight hour shifts for regular flow, 4 hour downtime for preventive maintenance or catch-up
Measures to Promote Flexibility: Setup
Reduction
Internal vs. External Setups:
External setup– performed while machine is still running
Internal setup– performed while machine is down
Setup reduction requires:
1. Separation of the internal setup from the external setup
2. Convert as much as possible of the internal setup to the external setup
3. Elimination the adjustment process by use of fixtures or sensors
4. Abolish the setup itself (uniform product design, combining production, using parallel
machines)
Measures to Promote Flexibility: Cross
Training
Cross-training of workers and worker rotation system
Adds flexibility to inherently inflexible system
Allows capacity to float to smooth flow
Reduces boredom
Fosters appreciation for overall picture
Increases potential for idea generation
Measures to Promote Flexibility:
Workforce Agility
Cross-trained workers:
perform work where needed
work can be performed by workers at adjacent stations
reduces variability in tasks, and hence line stoppages/quality problems reduces
provide more heads per problem area
facilitate sharing of tasks
appreciate line-wide perspective
Measures to Promote Flexibility: Plant
Layout
Better plant layout
Machines for successive operations can be placed together
Promote flow with little WIP
Facilitate workers staffing multiple machines
U-shaped cell layouts (prominently used in Japan)
Provide maximum visibility
Provide minimum walking
Allows flexibility in number of workers Inbound Stock Outbound Stock
Facilitates monitoring of work entering and leaving cell
Workers can conveniently cooperate to smooth flow and address problems
Focused Factories
Pareto Analysis:
Small percentage of SKUs represent large percentage of volume
Large percentage of SKUs represent little volume but much complexity
Dedicated Lines (large volume)
for families of high runners
few setups Saw Lathe Mill Drill
little complexity
Warehouse
Saw Mill Drill Paint
Assembly
Stores
Job Shop Environment (little volume) Grind Mill Drill Paint
for low runners Weld Grind Lathe Drill
many setups
Saw Grind Paint
poorer performance, but only
on smaller portion of business
Warehouse
Assembly
Stores
Lathe
Mill
Drill
Kanban
Definition: A “Kanban” is a sign-board or card in Japanese and is the name of the flow control
system developed by Toyota.
Kanban enables:
Kanban is a tool for realizing just-in-time.
Production process must be managed to provide smooth flow
Leveling of production volumes
Working in accordance with standard work methods.
Push vs. Pull
Push systems schedule releases
Pull systems authorize releases
Kanban is a “pull system
Two-Card Kanban
Inbound Outbound Inbound Outbound
stockpoint stockpoint stockpoint stockpoint
A full container is found and moved
to inbound stock point.
Move card is put on
empty container.
It authorizes pickup
When material is needed
When stock is removed, Move card is placed in
production card placeed hold box.
in hold box.
Production cards Move cards Production card authorizes
preceding operation to make
enough
No. of Kanbans= demand in the cycle
d
Deman
size of each container Production card Workstation ready for new task.
Cycle: Production part + demand part Move card Operator takes production card.
D is demand per unit of time
Adapted from Hopp and
MRP versus Kanban
Production is triggered by schedule
MRP
Lover Level
Inventory … Assembly
Completed work pushed to the next workstation
Kanban
Lover Level Assembly
Inventory …
…
Production is triggered by Kanban signal
Kanban Signals Full Containers
The Lessons of JIT
The production environment itself is used as a control
Setup time reduction, designing products for manufacturing, leveling production
schedule…
Operational issues matter strategically
Need to examine examine mundane aspect to reduce waste
Controlling WIP is important
Need short cycle times, high quality levels
Speed and flexibility are important assets
Quality can come first
Continual improvement is a condition for maintaining competitive edge
Thank you