Scribd
Upload
9 views11 pages

Coal Presentation 1

The document outlines the development of a two-player Rock-Paper-Scissors game using x86 assembly language, focusing on input validation, result display, and error handling. It details the program workflow, game logic, and input handling to ensure smooth gameplay. Additionally, it concludes with insights on the game's strategy, psychology, and potential future enhancements like AI opponents.

Uploaded by

Gaming with Eesar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
9 views11 pages

Coal Presentation 1

The document outlines the development of a two-player Rock-Paper-Scissors game using x86 assembly language, focusing on input validation, result display, and error handling. It details the program workflow, game logic, and input handling to ensure smooth gameplay. Additionally, it concludes with insights on the game's strategy, psychology, and potential future enhancements like AI opponents.

Uploaded by

Gaming with Eesar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

PRESENTED BY:

RANA IKTIKHAR [225]


AHSAN SALEEMI [226]
ESSAR [498]
ABEEHA UMER [239]
AANIA NAVEED [204]
Objective:
1. Develop a two-player Rock-
Paper-Scissors game using x86
assembly language.
2. Validate player inputs
effectively.
3. Display results clearly for
players.
4. Handle errors gracefully to
ensure smooth gameplay.
5. Understand low-level
implementation of high-level
concepts.
PROGRAM WORKFLOW:
*Steps:*

1. Prompt Player 1 for input.


2. Validate Player 1’s input.
3. Repeat for Player 2.
4. Compare choices and determine the
winner.
5. Display results or errors.
Game In Assembly Code
[Link] Evaluation:
1. Check if both players made the same choice
(draw condition).
[Link] Player 1's Choice:
1. Check if Player 1 chose Rock, Paper, or Scissors.
2. Use conditional checks to direct the flow based on
Player 1's choice.
[Link] vs. Scissors:
1. If Player 1 chose Rock, check if Player 2 chose
Scissors.
2. Rock wins against Scissors.
[Link] vs. Rock:
1. If Player 1 chose Paper, check if Player 2 chose
Rock.
2. Paper wins against Rock.
[Link] vs. Paper:
1. If Player 1 chose Scissors, check if Player 2 chose
Paper.
2. Scissors win against Paper.
[Link] Messages:
1. Display a winning message for Player 1 if they
win.
2. Display a winning message for Player 2 if they
win.
GAME
LOGIC
Core Comparisons:
 - Draw if choices
match.
 - Rock beats Scissors.
 - Paper beats Rock.
 - Scissors beats
Paper.
Input Handling Player
Choices:
• 1 represents Rock.
• 2 represents Paper.
• 3 represents Scissors.
Input Validation:
• Ensures the input is within the valid range
(1 to 3).
• Displays an error message for invalid
entries.
• Prompts the player to re-enter until a
valid choice is made.
RESULT DISPLAY

*Outcome
Messages:*
 "Player 1 wins."
 "Player 2 wins."
 "It’s a draw."
CONCLUSION

• 1. Rock-Paper-Scissors is a game of imperfect information.


• 2. Understanding probability and psychology improves chances.
• 3. Adaptability and strategic thinking are key to success
Final Thoughts:
• 1. Rock-Paper-Scissors combines luck, skill, and social interaction.
• 2. Understanding the game's math and psychology enhances enjoyment.
• 3. Apply strategic thinking to improve your gameplay.
Future Directions:
• 1. Explore AI-based opponents.
• 2. Develop new strategies and tactics.
• 3. Analyze player behavior and psychology.
ANY QUESTION??
THANKYOU
THANKYOU

You might also like