LEADERSHIP STYLES OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS IN FACILITATING
THE TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS OF TEACHERS
AND LEARNERS OF NAAWAN DISTRICT
MARY GRACE D. GEJON
MAY 2024
Background of the Study
Effective leadership is essential for the development of both instructors and society. School
principals play a critical role in shaping teaching and learning environments. Visionary and
transformational leaders can inspire teachers, motivate students, and promote continuous
improvement. Successful technology integration initiatives are one example of how such
leadership can enhance teaching practices and student performance. In the context of
21st-century challenges, academic leaders must navigate cultural and instructional
reforms. Research indicates that transformational leadership improves teacher
effectiveness and student outcomes, while autocratic and laissez-faire styles can have
negative impacts (Sebastian & Allensworth, 2019; Prabahar & Jerome, 2023).
Background of the Study
In the Philippines, school principals face challenges such as limited resources and
overcrowded classrooms. Studies suggest that democratic and servant leadership styles
are most effective in addressing these issues (Romila & Uy, 2024). To promote positive
relationships and continuous training, the Department of Education (DepEd) has revised
guidelines through DepEd Memorandum No. 18, s. 2012. However, unethical leadership
practices still exist in some districts, adversely affecting teacher motivation and student
achievement. There is a lack of research on the impact of different leadership styles
among school administrators, particularly in districts like Naawan.
Purpose of the Study
The study aims to investigate the leadership styles of school administrators
in the Naawan District and their effects on the teaching and learning
processes. It focuses on identifying and describing these leadership styles,
understanding teachers' and learners' perceptions of their impact, and
examining how administrators adapt their styles to meet various needs and
challenges. The ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding
of how leadership influences educational outcomes in the district.
Research Questions
1. What are the leadership styles employed by the school administrators to
facilitate the teaching-learning process of teachers and learners?
2. How do the teachers and learners perceive the impact of leadership styles
employed by the school administrators on their teaching-learning processes?
3. In what ways do school administrators adapt their leadership styles to
address the diverse needs and challenges faced by the teachers and
learners?
Theoretical Framework
This study utilizes James MacGregor Burns' transformational leadership theory, which was
introduced in 1978. Although originally focused on political leaders, this theory is now
applied in organizational psychology. Transformational leadership is described as a process
where leaders and followers work together to reach higher levels of morale and motivation.
Burns noted the difficulty in distinguishing between management and leadership,
emphasizing the differences in traits and behaviors. Transformational leadership aims to
achieve both individual and social change, fostering valuable and positive development in
followers, ultimately leading to self-improvement. When applied authentically, it enhances
motivation, morale, and performance through various mechanisms.
Conceptual Framework
The conceptual framework of this study consists of four main parts: input, process,
output, and outcome.
1. Input: Participants (principals, teachers, students) and materials (interview
questions, observations).
2. Process: Conducting detailed interviews with school heads, teachers, and learners.
3. Output: Qualitative transcripts from interviews on the leadership styles of school
heads.
4. Outcome: Anticipated improvement in leadership styles, positively influencing the
teaching and learning process.
Research Environment
The study will be conducted in selected primary education schools in Naawan
District, located in the northern part of Mindanao, Philippines. Naawan District, known
for its vibrant cultural heritage and diverse community, includes eleven elementary
schools, four senior high schools, and three junior high schools. This locale was chosen
because it represents a typical rural educational setting, highlighting the challenges and
dynamics faced by primary schools in similar contexts.
Research Environment
Additionally, the district's diverse leadership styles among school administrators
make it ideal for investigating the effectiveness of different leadership approaches. The
accessibility and cooperation of school administrators, teachers, and learners ensure
smooth data collection and the reliability of findings. Conducting research in Naawan
District aims to provide insights and recommendations relevant to similar rural primary
education settings, contributing to a deeper understanding of effective leadership styles
and supporting efforts to improve educational outcomes in similar contexts.
Research Participants, Sampling, and Selection Criteria
This study will involve 20 participants from the Naawan District, Philippines,
including five principals or school heads, five teachers, and ten students (two from each
school). Participants will be selected using purposive sampling based on specific
criteria. Principals or school heads must have at least five years of leadership
experience in one of the Naawan District schools. Teachers must be actively teaching
subjects related to the curriculum in the selected schools. Students must be in grade
five or six, currently enrolled in one of the selected schools, and willing to provide
insights on the teaching-learning process.
Analysis of Data
The analysis of data will follow the thematic analysis framework by Braun and Clarke
(2006), which involves six steps: familiarizing with the data, generating codes, combining
codes into themes, reviewing themes, determining the significance of themes, and
reporting findings. This structured approach helps identify patterns and themes in
qualitative data. Data from interviews and discussions will be transcribed from audio
recordings to text for easier analysis. To ensure accuracy, a professional transcriptionist
will proofread the transcriptions. Interviews will be conducted in the participants'
preferred language, and the researcher will translate the transcribed text as necessary.
Reference
Abbas, A., Saud, M., Usman, I., and Ekowati, D. (2020). Servant leadership and religiosity: An indicator of employee
performance in the education sector. Int. J. Innov. Creativity Change 13, 391–409.
Agasisti, T., Bowers, A. J., & Soncin, M. (2018). School principals’ leadership types and student achievement in the
Italian context: Empirical results from a three-step latent class analysis. Educational Management Administration
& Leadership, 47(6), 860–886. [Link]
Al Khajeh, E. H. (2018). Impact of Leadership Styles on Organizational Performance. Journal of Human Resources
Management Research, 2018, Article ID 687849. - References - Scientific Research Publishing. (n.d.).
[Link]. [Link]
Al Rahbi, D., Khalid, K., & Khan, M., (2019). The Effects of LeadershipStylesonTeam Motivation. Academy of
Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 16. Issue2. pp. 1-11.
Angrosino, M. V. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. Sage Publications.
A S De Vos, & Strydom, H. (1998). Research at grass roots : a primer for the caring professions. J.L. Van Schaik.
Aquino, C. J. C., Afalla, B. T., & Fabelico, F. L. (2021). Managing educational institutions: School heads’ leadership
practices and teachers’ performance. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education
(IJERE), 10(4), 1325–1333. [Link]
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage
Publications.
Day, C., & Sammons, P. (2016). Successful school leadership. Education Development Trust.
DuFour, R., and Marzano, R. J. (2011). Leaders of Learning: How District, School, and Classroom Leaders Improve
Student Achievement. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree [Link], S., & Malmberg, L.-E. (2016). Teachers’
self-efficacy in 14 OECD countries: Teacher, student group, school and leadership effects. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 56, 185–195. [Link]
Thank You