Introduction

GASTROINTESTINAL
BLEEDING
Dr. Haitham Al-Amir
Lecturer of Internal Medicine
Introduction
 Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) common clinical
problem
 GIB traditionally divided into either upper, lower
Or acute and chronic
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB):
 bleeding from any source proximal to ligament of
Treitz
Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB):
 bleeding from any source distal to ligament of Treitz
UGIB is more common than LGIB;
UGIB approx. 67/100,000 population
LGIB approx. 36/100,000 population
LGIB:
 More common with increasing age
 More common in men
 mortality rate 2 - 4%
Epidemiology
GIB- Presentation
Haematemesis: Vomiting of blood whether fresh
and red or digested and black.
Melaena: Passage of loose, black tarry stools
with a characteristic foul smell.
Coffee ground vomiting: Blood clot in the
vomitus.
Hematochezia: Passage of bright red blood per
rectum, usually indicates bleeding from the
lower GI tract, but can occasionally be the
presentation for a briskly bleeding upper GI
source
GIB- Presentation
 The presence of frank bloody emesis suggests more
active and severe bleeding in comparison to coffee-
ground emesis.
 Lower GI bleeding classically presents with
hematochezia, however bleeding from the right colon
or the small intestine can present with melena.
 Bleeding from the left side of the colon tends to
present bright red in color, whereas bleeding from the
right side of the colon often appears dark or maroon-
colored and may be mixed with stool.
GIB- Presentation
Other presentations which can accompany GIB
include hemodynamic instability, abdominal
pain and symptoms of anemia such as lethargy,
fatigue, syncope and angina.
Patients with acute bleeding usually have
normocytic red blood cells. Microcytic red
blood cells or iron deficiency anemia suggests
chronic bleeding.
 Occasionally, hemoptysis may be
confused for hematemesis or vice versa.
 Ingestion of bismuth containing products
or iron supplements may cause stools to
appear melanic.
Certain foods/dyes may turn emesis or
stool red, purple, or maroon (such as
beets).
Differential Diagnosis
 Majority of patients with UGIB will spontaneously
cease.
 70-80% will stop within first 48 hrs of onset; of those
10-20% will have recurrence of UGIB. At initial
presentation ~20% will continue to bleed.
 Mortality greatest in these patients and also patients
that have recurrent bleeding
UGIB
Can divide causes into; variceal and non-
variceal
Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment,
mortality of UGIB remains from 5 – 14%
Mortality higher in patients > 60 yrs old and in
patients with multiple comorbid conditions
Introduction
Etiology- UGIB
Etiology %
Peptic ulcer disease 50
Esophageal varices 10
Mallory-Weiss tear 5-10
Esophagitis 8-10
Neoplasm 2-5
Angiodysplasia 2-5
Miscellaneous 10
 Dieulafoy’s lesion (bleeding dilated vessel that erodes
through the gastrointestinal epithelium but has no primary
ulceration; can any location along the GI tract).
 Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia (GAVE; also known as
watermelon stomach).
 Cameron lesions (bleeding ulcers occurring at the site of a
hiatal hernia).
 Post-surgical bleeds (post-anastomotic bleeding, post-
polypectomy bleeding, post-sphincterotomy bleeding).
 Hemobilia (bleeding from the biliary tract).
Miscellaneou
s
20-30% of patients will have two or more
diagnoses of UGIB.
No disease is found in 10-15% of patients
(prognosis is excellent).
bleeding peptic ulcer disease most common
etiology and is also the most widely studied
UGIB
LGIB
Diverticulosis (colonic wall protrusion at the site of
penetrating vessels; over time mucosa overlying the vessel
can be injured and rupture leading to bleeding).
Angiodysplasia
Infectious Colitis
Ischemic Colitis
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Colon cancer
LGIB
Hemorrhoids
Anal fissures
Rectal varices
Dieulafoy’s lesion
Radiation colitis
Post-surgical (post-poly pectomy bleeding,
post-biopsy bleeding)
Monitor hemodynamic status; Look for signs of
hemodynamic instability:
 Resting tachycardia: associated with the loss of less than 15%
total blood volume
 Orthostatic Hypotension: carries an association with the loss of
approximately 15% total blood volume
 Supine Hypotension: associated with the loss of approximately
40% total blood volume
UGIB- Initial
Evaluation
Confirm UGI source of bleeding by
history (hematemesis – fresh blood or coffee
ground emesis, melena)
Nasogastric aspiration is 80% sensitive for
actively bleeding UGI source
 False negative aspirates occur when the
tube is improperly positioned or when
reflux of blood from a duodenal source
prevented by pylorospasm or obstruction
UGIB- Initial
Evaluation
 Complete blood count
Hemoglobin/Hematocrit
INR, PT, PTT
Liver and renal function tests
UGIB- Lab
Evaluation
UGIB- Treatment /
Management
Risk Stratification
Specific risk calculators attempt to help identify
patients who would benefit from ICU level of care;
most stratify based on mortality risk.
The Rockall Score calculate the mortality rate of upper
GI bleeds. There are two separate Rockall scores; One
is calculated before endoscopy and identifies pre-
endoscopy mortality, whereas the second score is
calculated post-endoscopy and calculates overall
mortality and re-bleeding risks.
UGIB- Treatment /
Management
 Acute management of UGIB typically involves;
1. Assessment of the appropriate setting
2. Resuscitation
3. Supportive therapy
4. Investigating the underlying cause and
attempting to correct it.
UGIB- Treatment /
Management
Setting
 ICU; Patients with hemodynamic instability,
continuous bleeding, or those with a significant risk of
morbidity/mortality should undergo monitoring in an
intensive care unit to facilitate more frequent
observation of vital signs and more emergent
therapeutic intervention.
UGIB- Treatment /
Management
Setting
Most patients with GI bleeding will require
hospitalization. However, some young, healthy
patients with self-limited and asymptomatic
bleeding may be safely discharged and
evaluated on an outpatient basis.
UGIB- Resuscitation
Nothing by mouth
Adequate IV access - at least two large-bore
peripheral IVs or a centrally placed.
Provide supplemental oxygen if patient hypoxic
(typically via nasal cannula, but patients with
ongoing hematemesis or altered mental status
may require intubation).
UGIB- Resuscitation
IV fluid resuscitation (with Normal Saline or
Lactated Ringer’s solution)
Type and Cross matching.
Transfusions:
RBC transfusion; typically started if hemoglobin is
< 7g/dL, including cardiac patients.
Platelet transfusion; started if platelet count <
50,000.
Prothrombin complex concentrate; if INR > 2
UGIB- Resuscitation
Medications;
PPIs: Bolus (80 mg), followed by
maintainence (8 mg/kg/hr)- 3-5 days-
significant benefit in decreasing recurrent
bleeding.
Vasoactive medications: Somatostatin and its
analog octreotide can be used to treat
variceal bleeding by inhibiting vasodilatory
hormone release.
Erythromycin: Given to improve visualization
UGIB- Resuscitation
Antibiotics; Considered prophylactically in
patients with cirrhosis to prevent SBP,
especially from endoscopy
Anticoagulant/antiplatelet agents; Should be
stopped if possible in acute bleeds. Consider
the reversal of agents on a case-by-case basis
dependent on the severity of bleeding and
risks of reversal.
UGIB- Resuscitation
Placement of a sengestaken tube should be
considered in patients with hemodynamic
instability/massive GI bleeds in the setting of
known varices, which should be done only
once the airway is secured.
This procedure carries a significant
complication risk (including arrhythmias,
gastric or esophageal perforation) and should
only be done by an experienced provider as a
temporizing measure.
UGIB- Endoscopy
Can be diagnostic and therapeutic. It is the
test of choice for identifying and treating the
bleeding lesion
Allows visualization of the upper GI tract
(typically including from the oral cavity up to
the duodenum) and treatment with injection
therapy, thermal coagulation, hemostatic
clips/bands or band ligation.
No role for barium studies in acute UGIB
UGIB- Endoscopy
Greatest benefit in the ~20% of patients with
continued or recurrent bleeding
Improve morbidity and mortality: mortality
decreased by nearly 30%.
Active bleeding can be controlled in 85-90%
of patients, with less than 3% complication
rate.
Should be done within 12-24 hrs.
UGIB- Endoscopy
 Endoscopic Management
 Several endoscopic therapeutic techniques available
to attempt hemostasis in patients with UGIB
 Thermal
 Multipolar electrocautery /bipolar
electrocautery
 Argon plasma coagulation
 Injection
 Epinephrine
 Mechanical
 Band Ligation
 Hemoclips (Endoclip)
Endoscopy- Thermal
Small ulcer with a
prominent visible
vessel
Site after eradication of
the vessel using heater
probe
Endoscopy- Haemoclips
Endoscopy- Band ligation
ALGORITHM TO UGIB
UPPER AND LOWER GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDINGBLEEDING.ppt

UPPER AND LOWER GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDINGBLEEDING.ppt

  • 2.
  • 3.
    Introduction  Gastrointestinal bleeding(GIB) common clinical problem  GIB traditionally divided into either upper, lower Or acute and chronic Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB):  bleeding from any source proximal to ligament of Treitz Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB):  bleeding from any source distal to ligament of Treitz
  • 4.
    UGIB is morecommon than LGIB; UGIB approx. 67/100,000 population LGIB approx. 36/100,000 population LGIB:  More common with increasing age  More common in men  mortality rate 2 - 4% Epidemiology
  • 5.
    GIB- Presentation Haematemesis: Vomitingof blood whether fresh and red or digested and black. Melaena: Passage of loose, black tarry stools with a characteristic foul smell. Coffee ground vomiting: Blood clot in the vomitus. Hematochezia: Passage of bright red blood per rectum, usually indicates bleeding from the lower GI tract, but can occasionally be the presentation for a briskly bleeding upper GI source
  • 6.
    GIB- Presentation  Thepresence of frank bloody emesis suggests more active and severe bleeding in comparison to coffee- ground emesis.  Lower GI bleeding classically presents with hematochezia, however bleeding from the right colon or the small intestine can present with melena.  Bleeding from the left side of the colon tends to present bright red in color, whereas bleeding from the right side of the colon often appears dark or maroon- colored and may be mixed with stool.
  • 7.
    GIB- Presentation Other presentationswhich can accompany GIB include hemodynamic instability, abdominal pain and symptoms of anemia such as lethargy, fatigue, syncope and angina. Patients with acute bleeding usually have normocytic red blood cells. Microcytic red blood cells or iron deficiency anemia suggests chronic bleeding.
  • 8.
     Occasionally, hemoptysismay be confused for hematemesis or vice versa.  Ingestion of bismuth containing products or iron supplements may cause stools to appear melanic. Certain foods/dyes may turn emesis or stool red, purple, or maroon (such as beets). Differential Diagnosis
  • 9.
     Majority ofpatients with UGIB will spontaneously cease.  70-80% will stop within first 48 hrs of onset; of those 10-20% will have recurrence of UGIB. At initial presentation ~20% will continue to bleed.  Mortality greatest in these patients and also patients that have recurrent bleeding UGIB
  • 10.
    Can divide causesinto; variceal and non- variceal Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, mortality of UGIB remains from 5 – 14% Mortality higher in patients > 60 yrs old and in patients with multiple comorbid conditions Introduction Etiology- UGIB
  • 11.
    Etiology % Peptic ulcerdisease 50 Esophageal varices 10 Mallory-Weiss tear 5-10 Esophagitis 8-10 Neoplasm 2-5 Angiodysplasia 2-5 Miscellaneous 10
  • 12.
     Dieulafoy’s lesion(bleeding dilated vessel that erodes through the gastrointestinal epithelium but has no primary ulceration; can any location along the GI tract).  Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia (GAVE; also known as watermelon stomach).  Cameron lesions (bleeding ulcers occurring at the site of a hiatal hernia).  Post-surgical bleeds (post-anastomotic bleeding, post- polypectomy bleeding, post-sphincterotomy bleeding).  Hemobilia (bleeding from the biliary tract). Miscellaneou s
  • 13.
    20-30% of patientswill have two or more diagnoses of UGIB. No disease is found in 10-15% of patients (prognosis is excellent). bleeding peptic ulcer disease most common etiology and is also the most widely studied UGIB
  • 14.
    LGIB Diverticulosis (colonic wallprotrusion at the site of penetrating vessels; over time mucosa overlying the vessel can be injured and rupture leading to bleeding). Angiodysplasia Infectious Colitis Ischemic Colitis Inflammatory Bowel Disease Colon cancer
  • 15.
    LGIB Hemorrhoids Anal fissures Rectal varices Dieulafoy’slesion Radiation colitis Post-surgical (post-poly pectomy bleeding, post-biopsy bleeding)
  • 16.
    Monitor hemodynamic status;Look for signs of hemodynamic instability:  Resting tachycardia: associated with the loss of less than 15% total blood volume  Orthostatic Hypotension: carries an association with the loss of approximately 15% total blood volume  Supine Hypotension: associated with the loss of approximately 40% total blood volume UGIB- Initial Evaluation
  • 17.
    Confirm UGI sourceof bleeding by history (hematemesis – fresh blood or coffee ground emesis, melena) Nasogastric aspiration is 80% sensitive for actively bleeding UGI source  False negative aspirates occur when the tube is improperly positioned or when reflux of blood from a duodenal source prevented by pylorospasm or obstruction UGIB- Initial Evaluation
  • 18.
     Complete bloodcount Hemoglobin/Hematocrit INR, PT, PTT Liver and renal function tests UGIB- Lab Evaluation
  • 19.
    UGIB- Treatment / Management RiskStratification Specific risk calculators attempt to help identify patients who would benefit from ICU level of care; most stratify based on mortality risk. The Rockall Score calculate the mortality rate of upper GI bleeds. There are two separate Rockall scores; One is calculated before endoscopy and identifies pre- endoscopy mortality, whereas the second score is calculated post-endoscopy and calculates overall mortality and re-bleeding risks.
  • 20.
    UGIB- Treatment / Management Acute management of UGIB typically involves; 1. Assessment of the appropriate setting 2. Resuscitation 3. Supportive therapy 4. Investigating the underlying cause and attempting to correct it.
  • 21.
    UGIB- Treatment / Management Setting ICU; Patients with hemodynamic instability, continuous bleeding, or those with a significant risk of morbidity/mortality should undergo monitoring in an intensive care unit to facilitate more frequent observation of vital signs and more emergent therapeutic intervention.
  • 22.
    UGIB- Treatment / Management Setting Mostpatients with GI bleeding will require hospitalization. However, some young, healthy patients with self-limited and asymptomatic bleeding may be safely discharged and evaluated on an outpatient basis.
  • 23.
    UGIB- Resuscitation Nothing bymouth Adequate IV access - at least two large-bore peripheral IVs or a centrally placed. Provide supplemental oxygen if patient hypoxic (typically via nasal cannula, but patients with ongoing hematemesis or altered mental status may require intubation).
  • 24.
    UGIB- Resuscitation IV fluidresuscitation (with Normal Saline or Lactated Ringer’s solution) Type and Cross matching. Transfusions: RBC transfusion; typically started if hemoglobin is < 7g/dL, including cardiac patients. Platelet transfusion; started if platelet count < 50,000. Prothrombin complex concentrate; if INR > 2
  • 25.
    UGIB- Resuscitation Medications; PPIs: Bolus(80 mg), followed by maintainence (8 mg/kg/hr)- 3-5 days- significant benefit in decreasing recurrent bleeding. Vasoactive medications: Somatostatin and its analog octreotide can be used to treat variceal bleeding by inhibiting vasodilatory hormone release. Erythromycin: Given to improve visualization
  • 26.
    UGIB- Resuscitation Antibiotics; Consideredprophylactically in patients with cirrhosis to prevent SBP, especially from endoscopy Anticoagulant/antiplatelet agents; Should be stopped if possible in acute bleeds. Consider the reversal of agents on a case-by-case basis dependent on the severity of bleeding and risks of reversal.
  • 27.
    UGIB- Resuscitation Placement ofa sengestaken tube should be considered in patients with hemodynamic instability/massive GI bleeds in the setting of known varices, which should be done only once the airway is secured. This procedure carries a significant complication risk (including arrhythmias, gastric or esophageal perforation) and should only be done by an experienced provider as a temporizing measure.
  • 28.
    UGIB- Endoscopy Can bediagnostic and therapeutic. It is the test of choice for identifying and treating the bleeding lesion Allows visualization of the upper GI tract (typically including from the oral cavity up to the duodenum) and treatment with injection therapy, thermal coagulation, hemostatic clips/bands or band ligation. No role for barium studies in acute UGIB
  • 29.
    UGIB- Endoscopy Greatest benefitin the ~20% of patients with continued or recurrent bleeding Improve morbidity and mortality: mortality decreased by nearly 30%. Active bleeding can be controlled in 85-90% of patients, with less than 3% complication rate. Should be done within 12-24 hrs.
  • 30.
    UGIB- Endoscopy  EndoscopicManagement  Several endoscopic therapeutic techniques available to attempt hemostasis in patients with UGIB  Thermal  Multipolar electrocautery /bipolar electrocautery  Argon plasma coagulation  Injection  Epinephrine  Mechanical  Band Ligation  Hemoclips (Endoclip)
  • 31.
    Endoscopy- Thermal Small ulcerwith a prominent visible vessel Site after eradication of the vessel using heater probe
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34.