[Introduction] | [How To] | [Review Assignments]
This document describes how to add testable assertions to the WSDL 2.0 specifications and assigns sections to members of the Working Group. The task of identifying all the testable assertions is very important since it will help us create a comprehensive test suite. It will also help implementers produce high quality implementations.
A testable assertion is a normative requirement in our specifications that can be checked by a validation program. Testable assertions should include one of the RFC 2119 keyowrds. Initially, we should focus on the keywords MUST, MUST NOT, SHALL, SHALL NOT, and REQUIRED since these are map to error conditions. We should also address the keywords SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, NOT RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL since these map to warnings and we want users of the specification to follow Best Practices.
We have defined a special XML tag: <assert>
that
is placed around the testable assertion. Here's an example:
<assert class="document" id="Import-0001"> However, any WSDL 2.0 document that contains component definitions that refer by QName to WSDL 2.0 components that belong to a different namespace MUST contain a <el>wsdl:import</el> &EII; for that namespace (see <specref ref="imports" /> ).</assert>This tag has the following attributes:
id
- a required identifier. The identifier consists of
a descriptive prefix and a unique numeric suffix separated by a
dash, as in Import-0001
. The numeric suffix must be
globally unique across all our specifications. Once this number is
assigned, it never changes. It may be removed but will never be reused.
The identifier as a whole must be stable since implementers will refer
to it.class
- a required classification of the assertion.
The valid classes are: component
, document
,
exchange
, and message
.
component
assertion is a requirement on WSDL 2.0
components, e.g. that an Interface must not extend itself.document
assertion is a requirement on WSDL 2.0
documents, e.g. that a document must not import its own namespace.exchange
assertion is a requirement on Web service
message exchanges, e.g. that a fault may replace a message.message
assertion is a requirement on concrete Web
service messages, e.g. that a SOAP message body satsifies a certain
XML schema.required
- an optional boolean that indicates if the
assertion is mandatory or suggested. The default is true
.
false
for SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, NOT
RECOMMENDED, MAY, or OPTIONAL requirements.true
for MUST, MUST NOT, SHALL,
SHALL NOT, or REQUIRED requirements.Editor | Id Range | Part | Section | Completed |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arthur | 1100000 | 1 | 1. Introduction | 2006-02-16 |
Arthur | 1200000 | 1 | 2. Component Model | 2006-02-26 |
Arthur | 1201000 | 1 | 2.1 Description | 2006-02-26 |
Roberto | 1202000 | 1 | 2.2 Interface | 2006-02-24 |
Roberto | 1203000 | 1 | 2.3 Interface Fault | 2006-02-24 |
Roberto | 1204000 | 1 | 2.4 Interface Operation | 2006-02-24 |
Roberto | 1205000 | 1 | 2.5 Interface Message Reference | 2006-02-24 |
Roberto | 1206000 | 1 | 2.6 Interface Fault Reference | 2006-02-24 |
Glen | 1207000 | 1 | 2.7 Feature | |
Glen | 1208000 | 1 | 2.8 Property | |
Jonathan | 1209000 | 1 | 2.9 Binding | |
Jonathan | 1210000 | 1 | 2.10 Binding Fault | |
Jonathan | 1211000 | 1 | 2.11 Binding Operation | |
Jonathan | 1212000 | 1 | 2.12 Binding Message Reference | |
Jonathan | 1213000 | 1 | 2.13 Binding Fault Reference | |
Jean-Jacques | 1214000 | 1 | 2.14 Service | 2006-03-10 |
Jean-Jacques | 1215000 | 1 | 2.15 Endpoint | 2006-03-10 |
Youenn | 1216000 | 1 | 2.16 XML Schema 1.0 Simple Types Used in the Component Model | 2006-03-16 |
Youenn | 1217000 | 1 | 2.17 Equivalence of Components | 2006-03-16 |
Youenn | 1218000 | 1 | 2.18 Symbol Spaces | 2006-03-16 |
Youenn | 1219000 | 1 | 2.19 QName resolution | 2006-03-16 |
Youenn | 1220000 | 1 | 2.20 Comparing URIs and IRIs | 2006-03-16 |
Roberto | 1300000 | 1 | 3. Types | 2006-02-24 |
Arthur | 1400000 | 1 | 4. Modularizing WSDL 2.0 descriptions | 2006-02-26 |
Arthur | 1500000 | 1 | 5. Documentation | 2006-02-26 |
Arthur | 1600000 | 1 | 6. Language Extensibility | 2006-02-26 |
Arthur | 1700000 | 1 | 7. Locating WSDL 2.0 Documents | 2006-02-26 |
Arthur | 1800000 | 1 | 8. Conformance | 2006-02-26 |
Arthur | 1900000 | 1 | A. The application/wsdl+xml Media Type | 2006-02-26 |
Amy | 2100000 | 2 | 1. Introduction | 2006-02-28 |
Amy | 2200000 | 2 | 2. Predefined Message Exchange Patterns | 2006-02-28 |
Amy | 2300000 | 2 | 3. Predefined Extensions | 2006-02-28 |
Umit | 2400000 | 2 | 4. Predefined Operation Styles | |
Charlton | 2500000 | 2 | 5. WSDL SOAP Binding Extension | |
Charlton | 2501000 | 2 | 5.1 XML Syntax Summary (Non-Normative) | |
Charlton | 2502000 | 2 | 5.2 Identifying the use of the SOAP Binding | |
Charlton | 2503000 | 2 | 5.3 SOAP Binding Rules | |
Charlton | 2504000 | 2 | 5.4 Specifying the SOAP Version | |
Charlton | 2505000 | 2 | 5.5 Specifying the SOAP Underlying Protocol | |
Charlton | 2506000 | 2 | 5.6 Binding Faults | |
Charlton | 2507000 | 2 | 5.7 Binding Operations | |
Charlton | 2508000 | 2 | 5.8 Declaring SOAP Modules | |
Charlton | 2509000 | 2 | 5.9 Declaring SOAP Header Blocks | |
Charlton | 2510000 | 2 | 5.10 WSDL SOAP 1.2 Binding | |
Charlton | 2511000 | 2 | 5.11 Conformance | |
Hugo | 2600000 | 2 | 6. WSDL HTTP Binding Extension | 2006-02-09 |
Hugo | 2601000 | 2 | 6.1 Identifying the use of the HTTP Binding | 2006-02-09 |
Hugo | 2602000 | 2 | 6.2 HTTP Syntax Summary (Non-Normative) | 2006-02-09 |
Hugo | 2603000 | 2 | 6.3 HTTP Binding Rules | 2006-02-09 |
Hugo | 2604000 | 2 | 6.4 Specifying the HTTP Version | 2006-02-09 |
Hugo | 2605000 | 2 | 6.5 Binding Operations | 2006-02-09 |
Hugo | 2606000 | 2 | 6.6 Declaring HTTP Headers | 2006-02-09 |
Hugo | 2607000 | 2 | 6.7 Specifying HTTP Error Code for Faults | 2006-02-09 |
Hugo | 2608000 | 2 | 6.8 Serialization Format of Instance Data | 2006-02-09 |
Hugo | 2609000 | 2 | 6.9 Specifying the Transfer Coding | 2006-02-09 |
Hugo | 2610000 | 2 | 6.10 Specifying the Use of HTTP Cookies | 2006-02-09 |
Hugo | 2611000 | 2 | 6.11 Specifying HTTP Access Authentication | 2006-02-09 |
Hugo | 2612000 | 2 | 6.12 Conformance | 2006-02-09 |