[1]\fnmJia \surWang 1]\orgdivCentre for Quantum Technology Theory, \orgnameSwinburne University of Technology, \orgaddress\cityMelbourne, \postcode3122, \countryAustralia
Hyperspherical Analysis of Dimer-Dimer Scattering in One-Dimensional Systems
Abstract
We present a comprehensive analysis of four-body scattering in one-dimensional (1D) quantum systems using the adiabatic hyperspherical representation (AHR). Focusing on dimer-dimer collisions between two species of fermions interacting via the sinh-cosh potential, we implement the slow variable discretization (SVD) method to overcome numerical challenges posed by sharp avoided crossings in the potential curves. Our numerical approach is benchmarked against exact analytical results available in integrable regimes, demonstrating excellent agreement. We further explore non-integrable regimes where no analytical solutions exist, revealing novel features such as resonant enhancement of the scattering length associated with tetramer formation. These results highlight the power and flexibility of the AHR+SVD framework for accurate few-body scattering calculations in low-dimensional quantum systems, and establish a foundation for future investigations of universal few-body physics in ultracold gases.
1 Introduction
Since the groundbreaking development of laser cooling and trapping of atoms [1], the field of ultracold quantum gases has rapidly expanded and made a profound impact on the study of fundamental quantum phenomena [2, 3, 4]. At temperatures as low as a billionth of a degree Kelvin (nano-Kelvin, nK) and densities ranging from to , these systems reach the quantum degenerate regime, where the atomic de Broglie wavelength exceeds the typical interparticle spacing [5, 6]. A variety of trapping techniques enable the realization of low-dimensional systems, while Feshbach resonances allow for precise and tunable control over interparticle interactions [7, 8]. This extraordinary level of control, combined with recent advances in theoretical and computational techniques, makes ultracold gases an ideal platform for exploring few-body quantum physics and performing quantitative comparisons between theory and experiment.
One of the most striking few-body phenomena predicted in this context is the Efimov effect. In the early 1970s, Vitaly Efimov predicted that three identical resonant bosons can form a series of three-body bound states—now known as Efimov trimers—characterized by a discrete scaling symmetry [9]. Remarkably, the scaling factor is independent of short-range interaction details, making the phenomenon universal. Once considered purely theoretical, Efimov states have since been observed in numerous ultracold gas experiments [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]. Moreover, new forms of universality have emerged in these systems, with Efimov trimers displaying properties that reflect the long-range van der Waals tails of the underlying two-body potentials [21, 22, 23, 24, 25]. Other exotic few-body states, including super-Efimov [26, 27, 28] and semi-super Efimov states [29], have been theoretically proposed and are being actively explored in ultracold gases, particularly in systems with tunable dimensionality.
In this work, we investigate the four-body scattering problem in one-dimensional (1D) systems. A system of four fermions—two in one component and two in another—is the simplest nontrivial few-body configuration that captures the essential physics of ultracold fermionic gases. We numerically obtain essentially exact solutions to this problem using the adiabatic hyperspherical representation (AHR). AHR is a well-established method in atomic, molecular, and optical physics, as well as in nuclear and condensed matter contexts. It has been particularly successful in describing few-body scattering in ultracold gases, notably in the seminal work by Greene and collaborators on ultracold collisions [30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36] and Efimov physics [37, 38, 23]. While AHR can also be applied to four-body problems in three dimensions, doing so typically requires carefully tailored variational basis sets due to the increased number of degrees of freedom [39, 40, 41].
In contrast, the reduced dimensionality of 1D systems offers computational advantages, allowing us to apply numerically exact diagonalization methods using simple B-spline basis functions. Although some adiabatic hyperspherical potential curves for 1D four-body systems have been presented in previous studies [39], scattering observables such as the dimer-dimer scattering length have not yet been computed. A key challenge in these calculations is the presence of sharp avoided crossings in the adiabatic potential curves, which complicate numerical integration of the coupled channel equations.
To overcome this difficulty, we employ the slow variable discretization (SVD) method, which enables stable and accurate computation of scattering observables [42, 43]. In particular, we focus on a model interaction known as the - potential, for which analytical solutions are available for certain parameter regimes [44]. We benchmark our numerical results against these exact solutions, and further extend the analysis to parameter ranges where no analytical solutions exist.
2 Theory
2.1 Hyperspherical Coordinate
We consider four particles confined to one dimension (1D), with coordinates and masses (for ). It is convenient to begin by transforming to “H”-type Jacobi coordinates, where the configuration is illustrated in Fig. 1 (a). We define
(1) |
Here, are the conventional Jacobi coordinate, while are their corresponding mass-scaled forms. The centre-of-mass coordinate can usually be separated from the dynamics. The reduced masses are defined by , , and . The four-body reduced mass can essentially be defined arbitrarily as long as the relative kinetic energy operator are defined consistently. We choose , and the relative kinetic energy operator reads as
(2) |
Hereafter, we focus on the equal-mass case: of for all . Then , , , and . We assume particles 1 and 2 are identical fermions, as are particles 3 and 4, but the two pairs are distinguishable from each other. The pairwise distances between the particles and become:
(3) |
We introduce hyperspherical coordinates in analogy with three-dimensional (3D) spherical coordinate:
(4) |
with the hyperradius , and the hyperangles where and . Figure 1 (b) illustrates the mapping between the geometric configuration of the four particles and the hyperangles. For clarity, we only show the region and , as the full configuration space can be reconstructed using symmetry operations (see discussion below).
The relative kinetic energy operator becomes:
(5) |
with the hyperangular momentum operator defined as:
(6) |
This operator has the same form as the angular momentum operator in three-dimensional space, which is expected since the number of relative degrees of freedom in our four-body problem is also three.
The four-body Schrödinger equation (after separating the center-of-mass degree of freedom) is given by
(7) |
We define a rescaled wave function , which satisfies
(8) |
where denotes the interaction potential among particles.

2.2 The - potential
For ultracold atomic systems, the total interaction potential can usually be modeled as a sum of pairwise interactions:
(9) |
where the interparticle distances can then be explicitly written in terms of hyperspherical coordinates:
(10) |
The system we now wish to focus consists of two kinds of fermions with the same mass , distinguished only by a label . The pair-wise potential considered here are called the - potential [44], which follows the form of
(11) |
where . This form ensures that like particles (same ) interact repulsively, while unlike particles experience an attractive interaction. In this sense, the system is analogous to an electron-hole model, where can be interpreted as an effective charge. At large distances, both types of interactions decay exponentially with a characteristic length scale , which we hereafter set to unity. The corresponding natural energy scale is then . Throughout this work, we adopt and as natural units to interpret the length and energy scales in the figures.
Figure 1 (c) shows the four-body potential at hyperradius as a function of the hyperangles. The plot reveals a clear fourfold symmetry, with identical potential landscapes across four regions. Notably, a deep minimum appears near , indicated by the dark blue region, while a lighter blue figure-eight-shaped stripe and a broader light green plateau surround it. As we will see, these regions correspond to different physical configurations: the deep minimum supports dimer-dimer scattering states, the lighter stripe indicates dimer–atom–atom configurations, and the outer plateau corresponds to four free atoms.
One interesting property of the - potential is that the two-body scattering properties are known analytically [44]. For the repulsive -potential between like particles, with the relative momentum defined as , the scattering amplitude is given as
(12) |
where is the gamma function. For unlike particles, the -potential are attractive, whose reflection and transmission amplitudes are given as
(13) |
where
(14) |
Dimer bound states appear as poles of the reflection and transmission amplitudes, with binding energy , , where denote the largest integer less than . The dimer can thus be described by two particles with momentums , where .
For the case of , the system become integrable for arbitrary number of particles. No other bound states exists other than the dimer bound states mentioned above. The atom-dimer scattering amplitude between a particle with momentum and a pair of bounded particles with momenta is given by
(15) |
with . The dimer-dimer scattering amplitude between bound atom pairs with and are determined by the phase shift
(16) |
with . For scattering between the ground state dimers , we have , and . For , the ground state dimer-dimer scattering amplitude has a simplified analytical form
(17) |
Since this is the lowest scattering channel, this scattering amplitude is equivalent to the -matrix. The closely related -matrix is given by
(18) |
and the energy-dependent dimer-dimer scattering length is given by
(19) |
The dimer-dimer scattering length at zero scattering energy is thus given by
(20) |
where is the digamma function and is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. We will use these analytical results to benchmark our numerical calculations.
3 Results
3.1 Hyperspherical potential
To efficiently solve Eq. 8, we adopt the AHR. This involves solving the hyperangular eigenvalue problem:
(21) |
where are the hyperspherical potentials, and are the corresponding channel functions, which depend parametrically on hyperradius . These functions form a truncated basis for expanding the total wave function:
(22) |
where indexes the independent solutions and is the number of channels retained in the expansion.
Before proceeding further, we note that the calculation can often be simplified by imposing permutation symmetry for identical particles. In what follows, we focus on the case of four fermions, where particles 1 and 2 are assigned , and particles 3 and 4 are assigned . The total wave function must be antisymmetrized using the operator
(23) |
where denotes the exchange operator for particles and . From the expressions of the interparticle distances in Eq. (10), we find that pas , while maps , revealing the fourfold symmetry observed in the potential landscape shown in Fig. 1 (c). Since the hyperangular momentum operator takes the same form as the angular momentum operator for a single particle in three-dimensional space, the wave function can be formally expanded using spherical harmonics: . Applying the antisymmetrization operator to these functions yields antisymmetrized basis functions of the form , where is a positive integers.
The pair-wise potential also exhibits certain symmetries: it is even in , i.e., , and identical for like-particle pairs, i.e., . As a result, the full Hamiltonian is invariant under two commuting operations and . These symmetries allow us to define two good quantum numbers: , . Consequently, the calculation can be restricted to the reduced domain and , with numerical basis subject to the appropreate boundary conditions. We find that the ground-state dimer-dimer channel lies in the symmetry sector with and , corresponding to even and odd , which implies , , and remains finite. (Boundary conditions for other symmetry sector are summarized in Table 1.) We employ B-spline basis functions, which are piecewise polynomials with local support. This choice facilitates the implementation of boundary conditions and leads to a sparse Hamiltonian matrix that can be efficiently diagonalized using eigensolvers such as ARPACK. In practice, we typically use approximately B-splines for the coordinate and 50 for , resulting in a sparse matrix of dimension around .
\toprule | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
\midrule | Finite | ||||
Finite | |||||
Finite | |||||
Finite | |||||
\botrule |
Figure 2 and 3 present the hyperspherical potentials for across different symmetry sectors, while Figure 4 shows the hyperspherical potentials for fixed and varying . A common feature among these curves is their convergence toward specific asymptotic thresholds at large hyperradii. For , the attractive interaction between unlike particles supports two dimer bound states with binding energies and . As a result, the dimer–dimer thresholds appear at , , and , indicated by solid horizontal lines in the figures. The dimer–atom–atom thresholds, corresponding to single dimer binding energies and , are shown as dashed horizontal lines. The atom–atom–atom–atom threshold lies at zero energy and is indicated by dash-dotted lines. An exception occurs in the second-lowest channel of Fig. 4 (b), which does not approach any of the aforementioned thresholds. This behavior arises because the reduced repulsion between like particles at permits the formation of trimer bound states, causing this channel to asymptotically approach a trimer–atom threshold. Additionally, many sharp avoided crossings are observed between potential curves that approach different thresholds, which may pose numerical challenges for accurate scattering calculations.
Figure 5 displays the channel functions for several representative configurations. In panel (a), we show the dimer–dimer channel function corresponding to the lowest hyperspherical potential at in Fig. 2 (a). Panel (b) shows the dimer–atom–atom channel function from the second-lowest channel at the same in Fig. 2 (a). Panel (c) presents the atom–atom–atom–atom channel function from the 41st channel at in Fig. 2 (a). Finally, panel (d) shows the trimer–atom channel function corresponding to the lowest potential at in Fig. 4 (b). These channel functions reveal the spatial structure of the associated scattering configurations. The dimer–dimer channel is primarily localized in the deep blue minimum of the four-body potential landscape [see Fig. 1 (c)], while the atom–atom–atom–atom configuration occupies the broader light green plateau. The dimer–atom–atom and trimer–atom configurations are mostly concentrated along the figure-eight-shaped light blue region, highlighting the distinct geometrical signatures of different few-body scattering processes.




3.2 Scattering
With the adiabatic potential curves and diabatic corrections obtained from the channel functions, we solve the radial Schrödinger equation as a set of coupled differential equations. However, near avoided crossings, the diabatic corrections can exhibit rapid variations that lead to numerical instability. To address this challenge, we use the slow variable discretization (SVD) method with a radial discrete variable representation (DVR) basis to expand , which gives
(24) |
The DVR approximation allows integrals of the form:
(25) |
for integrating smooth function with quadrature method. Under this approximation, the expansion coefficients satisfy the following equation:
(26) |
with kinetic energy matrix elements:
(27) |
and overlap matrix:
(28) |
Once the expansion coefficients are determined, the total wave function is fully specified, allowing access to all relevant information for quantum scattering analysis.
In practice, we compute the -matrix, which serves a similar role to the inverse logarithmic derivative of the wave function in single-channel scattering problems. It is defined as
(29) |
where and denote the wave function and its derivative, respectively, evaluated at a given hyperradius . At large distances, the physical scattering matrix (and the related reaction matrix ) can be obtained by applying asymptotic boundary conditions. For dimer-dimer scattering in the lowest channel, we use:
(30) |
(31) |
where and are the regular and irregular solutions in the lowest symmetric channel:
(32) |
(33) |
and , which is the hyperradial momentum with respect to the dimer–dimer threshold energy . The scattering energy between two dimers is then , and the dimer-dimer relative momentum is . The energy-dependent scattering length is computed using Eq. (19).
Figures 6 and 7 present the computed dimer–dimer scattering lengths between ground-state dimers of the -potential. In Fig. 6 (a), the energy-dependent scattering length is shown as a function of scattering energy for (red squares) and (blue circles). The solid curves represent the corresponding analytical solutions, with excellent agreement across all energies. Panel (b) shows the zero-energy scattering length as a function of , numerical results (red diamonds) again match the analytical curve closely. In contrast, Fig. 7 explores the more general case where , for a fixed and varying . In panel (a), the energy-dependent scattering length is plotted (blue circles), (red squares), and (purple triangles). As decreases, the repulsion between like particles weakens, allowing the formation of a tetramer. When the tetramer becomes bound, a resonance appears in the scattering length, which diverges as shown in panel (b). This resonance occurs near , signaling the onset of tetramer binding.


4 Summary
In this work, we developed a robust and numerically accurate framework for studying four-body quantum scattering in one-dimensional systems using the adiabatic hyperspherical representation combined with the slow variable discretization method. This approach enables precise resolution of dimer-dimer scattering properties, even in the presence of sharp avoided crossings in hyperspherical potentials.
We validated our method against known analytical results for - model interactions, finding excellent agreement across energy scales. Extending beyond analytically tractable regimes, we explored scattering in non-integrable systems and identified a resonance in the dimer-dimer scattering length indicative of tetramer formation. These results not only affirm the accuracy of our method but also demonstrate its potential to uncover emergent few-body phenomena in low-dimensional systems.
Our findings pave the way for future investigations into more complex configurations, such as mass-imbalanced mixtures, excited-state collisions, and recombination processes. The hyperspherical approach, enhanced by SVD, offers a powerful platform for quantitatively probing universal physics in ultracold atomic gases.
Acknowledgements J. W. acknowledges Nirav Mehta for useful discussions. This research was supported by the Australian Research Council’s (ARC) Discovery Program, Grants No. FT230100229 (J. W.), No. DP240101590 (H.H.), and No. DP240100248 (X.-J. L.).
References
- \bibcommenthead
- Metcalf and Straten [1999] Metcalf, H.J., Straten, P.: Laser Cooling and Trapping. Springer, New York (1999)
- Dalfovo et al. [1999] Dalfovo, F., Giorgini, S., Pitaevskii, L.P., Stringari, S.: Theory of bose-einstein condensation in trapped gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 463–512 (1999)
- Leggett [2001] Leggett, A.J.: Bose-einstein condensation in the alkali gases: Some fundamental concepts. Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 307–356 (2001)
- Giorgini et al. [2008] Giorgini, S., Pitaevskii, L.P., Stringari, S.: Theory of ultracold atomic fermi gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1215–1274 (2008)
- Anderson et al. [1995] Anderson, M.H., Ensher, J.R., Matthews, M.R., Wieman, C.E., Cornell, E.A.: Observation of bose-einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor. Science 269, 198 (1995)
- DeMarco and Jin [1999] DeMarco, B., Jin, D.S.: Onset of fermi degeneracy in a trapped atomic gas. Science 285, 1703 (1999)
- Bloch et al. [2008] Bloch, I., Dalibard, J., Zwerger, W.: Many-body physics with ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885–964 (2008)
- Chin et al. [2010] Chin, C., Grimm, R., Julienne, P., Tiesinga, E.: Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1225–1286 (2010)
- DeMarco and Jin [1970] DeMarco, B., Jin, D.S.: Weakly bound states of three resonantly interacting particles. Yad. Fiz. 12, 1080 (1970)
- Kraemer et al. [2006] Kraemer, T., Mark, M., Waldburger, P., Danzl, J.G., Chin, C., Engeser, B., Lange, A.D., Pilch, K., Jaakkola, A., Nägerl, H.-C., Grimm, R.: Evidence for efimov quantum states in an ultracold gas of caesium atoms. Nature 440, 315–318 (2006)
- Ottenstein et al. [2008] Ottenstein, T.B., Lompe, T., Kohnen, M., Wenz, A.N., Jochim, S.: Collisional stability of a three-component degenerate fermi gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 203202 (2008)
- Zaccanti et al. [2009] Zaccanti, M., Deissler, B., D’Errico, C., Fattori, M., JonaLasinio, M., Müller, S., Roati, G., Inguscio, M., Modugno, G.: Observation of an efimov spectrum in an atomic system. Nat. Phys. 5, 586–591 (2009)
- Pollack et al. [2009] Pollack, S.E., Dries, D., Hulet, R.G.: Universality in three- and four-body bound states of ultracold atoms. Science 326, 1683 (2009)
- Gross et al. [2009] Gross, N., Shotan, Z., Kokkelmans, S., Khaykovich, L.: Observation of universality in ultracold three-body recombination. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 163202 (2009)
- Huckans et al. [2009] Huckans, J.H., Williams, J.R., Hazlett, E.L., Stites, R.W., O’Hara, K.M.: Three-body recombination in a three-state fermi gas with widely tunable interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 165302 (2009)
- Williams et al. [2009] Williams, J.R., Hazlett, E.L., Huckans, J.H., Stites, R.W., Zhang, Y., O’Hara, K.M.: Evidence for an excited-state efimov trimer in a three-component fermi gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 130404 (2009)
- Nakajima et al. [2010] Nakajima, S., Horikoshi, M., Mukaiyama, T., Naidon, P., Ueda, M.: Nonuniversal efimov atom-dimer resonances in a three-component mixture of . Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 023201 (2010)
- Barontini et al. [2009] Barontini, G., Weber, C., Rabatti, F., Catani, J., Thalhammer, G., Inguscio, M., Minardi, F.: Observation of heteronuclear atomic efimov resonances. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 043201 (2009)
- Gross et al. [2010] Gross, N., Shotan, Z., Kokkelmans, S., Khaykovich, L.: Nuclear-spin-independent short-range three-body physics in ultracold atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 103203 (2010)
- Lompe et al. [2010] Lompe, T., Ottenstein, T.B., Serwane, F., Viering, K., Wenz, A.N., Zürn, G., Jochim, S.: Atom-dimer scattering in a three-component fermi gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 103201 (2010)
- Berninger et al. [2011] Berninger, M., Zenesini, A., Huang, B., Harm, W., Nägerl, H.-C., Ferlaino, F., Grimm, R., Julienne, P.S., Hutson, J.M.: Universality of the three-body parameter for efimov states in ultracold cesium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 120401 (2011)
- Wild et al. [2012] Wild, R.J., Makotyn, P., Pino, J.M., Cornell, E.A., Jin, D.S.: Measurements of tan’s contact in an atomic bose-einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 145305 (2012)
- Wang et al. [2012a] Wang, J., D’Incao, J.P., Esry, B.D., Greene, C.H.: Origin of the three-body parameter universality in efimov physics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 263001 (2012)
- Wang et al. [2012b] Wang, Y., Wang, J., D’Incao, J.P., Greene, C.H.: Universal three-body parameter in heteronuclear atomic systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 243201 (2012)
- D’Incao et al. [2013] D’Incao, J.P., Wang, J., Esry, B.D., Greene, C.H.: The universality of the efimov three-body parameter. Few-body Syst 54, 1523–1527 (2013)
- Nishida et al. [2013] Nishida, Y., Moroz, S., Son, D.T.: Super efimov effect of resonantly interacting fermions in two dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 235301 (2013)
- Gridnev [2014] Gridnev, D.K.: Three resonating fermions in flatland: proof of the super efimov effect and the exact discrete spectrum asymptotics. J. Phys. A 47, 505204 (2014)
- Gao et al. [2015] Gao, C., Wang, J., Yu, Z.: Revealing the origin of super efimov states in the hyperspherical formalism. Phys. Rev. A 92, 020504 (2015)
- Nishida [2017] Nishida, Y.: Semisuper efimov effect of two-dimensional bosons at a three-body resonance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 230601 (2017)
- Esry et al. [1996] Esry, B.D., Lin, C.D., Greene, C.H.: Adiabatic hyperspherical study of the helium trimer. Phys. Rev. A 54, 394–401 (1996)
- Suno et al. [2002] Suno, H., Esry, B.D., Greene, C.H., Burke, J.P.: Three-body recombination of cold helium atoms. Phys. Rev. A 65, 042725 (2002)
- D’Incao et al. [2009] D’Incao, J.P., Greene, C.H., Esry, B.D.: Adiabatic hyperspherical study of the helium trimer. J. Phys. B. 42, 044016 (2009)
- Wang et al. [2011] Wang, J., D’Incao, J.P., Greene, C.H.: Numerical study of three-body recombination for systems with many bound states. Phys. Rev. A 84, 052721 (2011)
- Wang et al. [2012] Wang, J., D’Incao, J.P., Wang, Y., Greene, C.H.: Universal three-body recombination via resonant -wave interactions. Phys. Rev. A 86, 062511 (2012)
- Chen and Greene [2022] Chen, Y.-H., Greene, C.H.: Efimov physics implications at -wave fermionic unitarity. Phys. Rev. A 105, 013308 (2022)
- Higgins and Greene [2025] Higgins, M.D., Greene, C.H.: Resonances and collisional properties of neutron-rich helium isotopes in the adiabatic hyperspherical representation. Phys. Rev. C 111, 014001 (2025)
- Esry et al. [1999] Esry, B.D., Greene, C.H., Burke, J.P.: Recombination of three atoms in the ultracold limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1751–1754 (1999)
- Wang et al. [2011] Wang, Y., D’Incao, J.P., Greene, C.H.: Efimov effect for three interacting bosonic dipoles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 233201 (2011)
- Mehta et al. [2007] Mehta, N.P., Rittenhouse, S.T., D’Incao, J.P., Greene, C.H.: Hyperspherical Approach to the Four-Body Problem. arXiv:0706.1296 (2007)
- D’Incao et al. [2009] D’Incao, J.P., Rittenhouse, S.T., Mehta, N.P., Greene, C.H.: Dimer-dimer collisions at finite energies in two-component fermi gases. Phys. Rev. A 79, 030501 (2009)
- Rittenhouse et al. [2011] Rittenhouse, S.T., Stecher, J., D’Incao, J.P., Mehta, N.P., Greene, C.H.: The hyperspherical four-fermion problem. J. Phys. B 44, 172001 (2011)
- Tolstikhin et al. [1996] Tolstikhin, O.I., Watanabe, S., Matsuzawa, M.: "slow" variable discretization: a novel approach for hamiltonians allowing adiabatic separation of variables. J. Phys. B 29, 389 (1996)
- Wang [2004] Wang, J.: Hyperspherical approach to quantal three-bodytheory. Phd thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder (2004)
- Sutherland [2004] Sutherland, B.: Beautiful Models: 70 Years of Exactly Solved Quantum Many-Body Problems. World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore (2004)