Probing J/ψJ/\psi Production Mechanisms in Proton–Proton Collisions at SPD/NICA Energies

Shubham Sharma [email protected] Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny 141700, Russia    Alexey Aparin [email protected] Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny 141700, Russia Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna 141980, Russia Institute for Nuclear Physics, Almaty, 050032, Kazakhstan
(November 5, 2025)
Abstract

We investigate inclusive J/ψJ/\psi production in proton–proton collisions at tens of GeV s\sqrt{s} energy, relevant for forthcoming measurements with the Spin Physics Detector (SPD) at NICA. Simulations are performed using the PEGASUS event generator with transverse-momentum-dependent (TMD) gluon densities, comparing the recent KMR-based KL2025{}^{\prime}2025 and CCFM-based LLM2024{}^{\prime}2024 parametrizations. Differential cross sections in rapidity and transverse momentum exhibit smooth, stable behavior under renormalization-scale variation, while factorization-scale dependence exposes limitations of the LLM2024{}^{\prime}2024 set at low scales in contrast to KL2025{}^{\prime}2025. Normalized pTp_{T} spectra reveal distinct hardening patterns linked to the underlying gluon kTk_{T} broadening in each model. The relative contributions of color-singlet and color-octet channels are also quantified, demonstrating the dominance of color-octet mechanisms in the SPD energy regime. These results provide the first detailed assessment of quarkonium production sensitivity to gluon TMDs near threshold, offering timely theoretical guidance for upcoming J/ψJ/\psi measurements at SPD/NICA.

1. Motivation— Quarkonium production in hadronic collisions serves as a powerful probe of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) across its perturbative and nonperturbative domains ALICE:2021dtt; Arbuzov:2020cqg. In particular, the production of the charmonium state J/ψJ/\psi is directly sensitive to gluon dynamics: at leading order it proceeds via gluon–gluon fusion, while its hadronization into a bound state involves the interplay between short-distance scattering and long-distance QCD effects Arbuzov:2020cqg; physics5030044; Petrelli:1997ge.

Measurements of inclusive J/ψJ/\psi production over a broad range of center-of-mass energies have enabled stringent tests of theoretical frameworks such as the Color-Singlet Model (CSM) Baier:1983va, Nonrelativistic QCD (NRQCD) factorization Bodwin:1994jh; Butenschoen:2012px, and the Color-Evaporation Model (CEM) Frawley:2008kk. High-precision LHC measurements ATLAS:2011aqv; LHCb:2021pyk; ALICE:2021dtt have established a detailed picture of quarkonium production at multi-TeV energies, where global analyses combining color-singlet (CS) and color-octet (CO) mechanisms achieve good agreement with data.

At moderate collision energies, however, the situation is less constrained. Here, the relevant gluon momentum fractions are larger, the available phase space for high-pTp_{T} recoils is reduced, and the sensitivity to the transverse motion of partons becomes clearer Aidala:2012mv. In this regime, the transverse-momentum-dependent (TMD) formalism provides a natural extension of QCD factorization, allowing direct access to the intrinsic kTk_{T} structure and polarization of gluons inside the proton physics5030044; Arbuzov:2020cqg. Quarkonium production, particularly inclusive J/ψJ/\psi, thus emerges as a promising observable to probe gluon TMDs and their evolution.

The forthcoming Spin Physics Detector (SPD) experiment at the NICA collider will explore proton–proton collisions at s27GeV\sqrt{s}\leq 27~\mathrm{GeV} with polarized beams Arbuzov:2020cqg; physics5030044. This energy range bridges the gap between fixed-target and high-energy collider experiments, providing a uniquely clean environment to investigate gluon dynamics in the transition region where perturbative and nonperturbative effects overlap SPDproto:2021hnm.

In this work, we investigate inclusive J/ψJ/\psi production in proton–proton collisions for s27GeV\sqrt{s}\leq 27~\mathrm{GeV} using the PEGASUS event generator, which implements TMD gluon densities in a kTk_{T}-factorized framework Lipatov:2019oxs. Two recent TMD parameterizations are employed: the KMR-based KL2025{}^{\prime}2025 Kotikov:2025wft and the CCFM-based LLM2024{}^{\prime}2024 Lipatov:2024xni sets. We present differential cross sections in transverse momentum and rapidity, including theoretical uncertainties from renormalization-scale variations. The normalized pTp_{T} spectra reveal distinct behaviors for the two TMD sets, reflecting their different evolution patterns at SPD scale. Additionally, the relative contributions of CS and CO channels are analyzed across beam energies, elucidating how production mechanisms evolve from the SPD regime to the high-energy domain. These results establish the predictive foundations for quarkonium measurements at SPD/NICA and quantify the sensitivity of J/ψJ/\psi observables to the underlying gluon densities.

2. Theoretical Framework— Within the NRQCD factorization approach, the inclusive J/ψJ/\psi production cross section is written as a sum over intermediate cc¯c\bar{c} states nn  Bodwin:1994jh; Petrelli:1997ge,

dσ(ppJ/ψ+X)=ndσ^(ppcc¯[n]+X)𝒪J/ψ[n],d\sigma(pp\to J/\psi+X)=\sum_{n}d\hat{\sigma}(pp\to c\bar{c}[n]+X)\,\langle\mathcal{O}^{J/\psi}[n]\rangle, (1)

where dσ^d\hat{\sigma} represents the perturbatively calculable short-distance coefficient (SDC) for the production of a heavy-quark pair in state [n][n], and 𝒪J/ψ[n]\langle\mathcal{O}^{J/\psi}[n]\rangle denotes the long-distance matrix element (LDME) governing its nonperturbative transition into a physical J/ψJ/\psi meson.

At leading order in αs\alpha_{s}, two classes of partonic subprocesses contribute:

  1. (i)

    CS mechanism:

    g+gcc¯[S1(1)3]+g,g^{*}+g^{*}\to c\bar{c}\big[{}^{3}S_{1}^{(1)}\big]+g, (2)

    where the cc¯c\bar{c} pair is produced directly in a CS configuration with the same quantum numbers as the J/ψJ/\psi Petrelli:1997ge. The final-state gluon ensures color conservation and carries part of the recoil momentum.

  2. (ii)

    CO mechanisms:

    g+gcc¯[n],n{S0(8)1,S1(8)3,PJ(8)3(J=0,1,2)},g^{*}+g^{*}\to c\bar{c}[n],\quad n\in\big\{{}^{1}S_{0}^{(8)},\,{}^{3}S_{1}^{(8)},\,{}^{3}P_{J}^{(8)}\,(J=0,1,2)\big\}, (3)

    where the cc¯c\bar{c} pair is produced in a color-octet state and subsequently evolves into the physical J/ψJ/\psi through soft-gluon emissions, modeled via electric dipole (E1) transitions Petrelli:1997ge. These 212\to 1 subprocesses contribute at the same order in αs\alpha_{s} as the CS 222\to 2 process.

Both CS and CO channels are implemented in the PEGASUS Lipatov:2019oxs event generator within the TMD factorization framework, where the initial gluons are off-shell (gg^{*}) and carry intrinsic transverse momentum kTk_{T}. The generated event samples include all relevant intermediate cc¯[n]c\bar{c}[n] states ([S1(1)3][{}^{3}S_{1}^{(1)}], [S0(8)1][{}^{1}S_{0}^{(8)}], [S1(8)3][{}^{3}S_{1}^{(8)}], [PJ(8)3][{}^{3}P_{J}^{(8)}]), allowing a consistent treatment of both color and spin dynamics of J/ψJ/\psi production at SPD/NICA energies.

In this study, the LDMEs are set to unity to isolate the kinematic dependence of the SDCs. The partonic cross sections are convoluted with TMD gluon densities evolved via the CCFM and KMR schemes. The renormalization and factorization scales are chosen as μ2=mT2=MJ/ψ2+pT2\mu^{2}=m_{T}^{2}=M_{J/\psi}^{2}+p_{T}^{2}, with the J/ψJ/\psi mass consistent with PDG values ParticleDataGroup:2018ovx; Lipatov:2019oxs.

Monte Carlo event generation and phase-space integration are performed using PEGASUS, which provides .lhe samples containing weighted events according to the kTk_{T}-factorization formalism Lipatov:2019oxs; Alwall:2006yp. Twelve statistically independent runs, each with 4×1054\times 10^{5} events, are produced to ensure stable predictions of differential distributions in pTp_{T}, yy, and s\sqrt{s}. For consistent comparison across different TMD gluon sets, the results are normalized to the total hadronic cross section where needed.

This framework provides a unified and quantitative basis to explore the sensitivity of inclusive J/ψJ/\psi production to the underlying gluon dynamics in the SPD/NICA energy range.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 1: Rapidity distributions dσ/dy{d\sigma}/{dy} for inclusive J/ψJ/\psi production at s=9\sqrt{s}=9, 1818, and 27GeV27~\mathrm{GeV} obtained using the KL2025{}^{\prime}2025 Kotikov:2025wft and LLM2024{}^{\prime}2024 Lipatov:2024xni gluon densities. The shaded bands represent the uncertainty from renormalization-scale variation. A clear broadening and enhancement of the distributions with increasing s\sqrt{s} reflect the expanding rapidity phase space and growing gluon–gluon luminosity at higher energies.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Differential cross sections dσ/dpT{d\sigma}/{dp_{T}} for inclusive J/ψJ/\psi production in pp collisions at s=9\sqrt{s}=9, 1818, and 27GeV27~\mathrm{GeV} using the KL2025{}^{\prime}2025 Kotikov:2025wft and LLM2024{}^{\prime}2024 Lipatov:2024xni gluon densities. The shaded bands indicate the uncertainty due to renormalization-scale variation. The comparison illustrates the evolution of the pTp_{T} spectrum with increasing collision energy.


3. Results and Discussion— Figure 1 shows the rapidity distributions dσ/dyd\sigma/dy for inclusive J/ψJ/\psi production at s=9\sqrt{s}=9, 1818, and 27GeV27~\mathrm{GeV}. The spectra exhibit a symmetric and centrally peaked structure across all studied energies, with the peak position remaining close to mid-rapidity (|ypeak|<0.07|y_{\text{peak}}|<0.07), consistent with the expected symmetry of proton–proton collisions in this regime.

A systematic broadening of the rapidity distribution with increasing energy is observed for both KL2025{}^{\prime}2025 and LLM2024{}^{\prime}2024 sets, as reflected by the rising RMS and FWHM values. The width roughly doubles from s=9\sqrt{s}=9 to 27GeV27~\text{GeV}, indicating the progressive opening of the rapidity phase space and the expanding kinematic reach in gluon momentum fractions. Concurrently, the overall magnitude of the distribution increases, reflecting the enhanced gluon–gluon luminosity that drives quarkonium production from the near-threshold to the intermediate-energy regime accessible at SPD.

The comparison between the two gluon density parameterizations reveals that LLM2024{}^{\prime}2024 systematically gives higher cross sections at all rapidity values, while maintaining a slightly broader shape than KL2025{}^{\prime}2025. This difference originates from the broader intrinsic transverse-momentum width and the softer small-xx gluon behavior encoded in the LLM2024{}^{\prime}2024 evolution, which enhance central production rates. At the lowest energy, s=9GeV\sqrt{s}=9~\mathrm{GeV}, both models show a mild suppression around y0y\simeq 0, indicative of near-threshold kinematic constraints on the accessible gluon flux.

The shaded bands represent the theoretical uncertainty estimated by varying the renormalization scale around its central value, μR=mT\mu_{R}=m_{T}, by a factor of two, i.e., μR=mT/2\mu_{R}=m_{T}/2 and μR=2mT\mu_{R}=2m_{T}, while keeping the factorization scale fixed at μF=mT\mu_{F}=m_{T}. The quantitative spread and overall behavior of these bands remain stable across the considered energy range. It is worth noting that variation of the factorization scale does not serve as an equally reliable estimator of theoretical uncertainty in this regime, as the LLM2024{}^{\prime}2024 set exhibits a rapid suppression of the cross section under downward scale shifts, indicating the onset of a kinematic threshold in its low-scale applicability.

The two gluon-density sets thus yield nearly identical rapidity shapes but notably different normalizations, indicating that the overall production rate is primarily controlled by the gluon-luminosity normalization, whereas the shape is determined by the kinematic mapping of the partonic subprocess. This systematic comparison highlights that, within the SPD energy domain, the yy–distribution serves as a sensitive probe of both the gluon-density normalization and the evolution pattern encoded in different unintegrated PDF parameterizations. The observed energy dependence of the width and normalization provides a consistent phenomenological signature of gluon–gluon fusion dominance and establishes a quantitative baseline for forthcoming SPD measurements of quarkonium production.

It is interesting to note that, at comparable energies, exclusive J/ψJ/\psi production in proton–proton ultraperipheral collisions yields dσ/dyd\sigma/dy values that are 10510^{-5}10410^{-4} times smaller than those reported here Goloskokov:2025hsk. The large difference originates from the dominance of electromagnetic interactions in ultraperipheral processes. Nevertheless, such measurements provide a valuable complementary perspective on J/ψJ/\psi production dynamics across different interaction regimes.

The transverse-momentum spectra, dσ/dpTd\sigma/dp_{T}, presented in Fig. 2, exhibit the expected steep falloff with increasing pTp_{T}. Both gluon-density models reproduce this trend, but the spectral shapes reveal distinct features. At s=9GeV\sqrt{s}=9~\mathrm{GeV}, the spectrum is limited to low pTp_{T}, reflecting the restricted phase space near threshold. With pTp_{T}, KL2025{}^{\prime}2025 prediction shows a relatively smaller initial amplitude and harder tail near the end. As the energy increases, the spectra broaden from about pT5GeVp_{T}\!\lesssim\!5~\mathrm{GeV} at s=9GeV\sqrt{s}=9~\mathrm{GeV} to nearly pT12GeVp_{T}\!\sim\!12~\mathrm{GeV} at s=27GeV\sqrt{s}=27~\mathrm{GeV}, illustrating the gradual transition from a soft, near-threshold domain to a more perturbative regime. Growth in overall normalization is consistent with the increasing gluon luminosity and available phase space. At these energies, LLM2024{}^{\prime}2024 prediction relatively yields the initial higher amplitude and harder tail with pTp_{T} compared to the KL2025{}^{\prime}2025 and a crossover region around 2GeV<pT<3GeV2~\mathrm{GeV}<p_{T}<3~\mathrm{GeV} is observed, signaling the onset of enhanced partonic activity beyond which KL2025{}^{\prime}2025 dominates. These features confirm that the pTp_{T} spectrum at SPD energies is sensitive to the magnitude and shape of gluon TMDs in the moderate-xx domain (x102101x\sim 10^{-2}\!-\!10^{-1}).

It is important to mention that LLM’24 density show predicitons beyond the maximum pTp_{T} range show here but fluctuations in its precision increases rapidly for dσ/dpT{d\sigma}/{dp_{T}} values below 1012nb/GeV10^{-12}~\mathrm{nb/GeV}.

To further quantify the model differences, normalized J/ψJ/\psi transverse-momentum spectra are compared in Fig. 3. The data are fitted with empirical functions of the form A(pT+p0)neBpTA(p_{T}+p_{0})^{n}e^{-Bp_{T}} for KL2025{}^{\prime}2025 and A(pT+p0)neBpT2A(p_{T}+p_{0})^{n}e^{-Bp_{T}^{2}} for LLM2024{}^{\prime}2024, yielding excellent agreement across the full pTp_{T} range.

The KL2025{}^{\prime}2025 fit, characterized by a larger parameter nn, corresponds to a slightly harder rise of the spectrum, whereas the LLM2024{}^{\prime}2024 form exhibits a smoother yet faster falloff at high pTp_{T} due to its Gaussian-like dependence, even though the associated parameter BB is smaller. These distinct behaviors directly reflect the different gluon kTk_{T}-broadening mechanisms intrinsic to each TMD parametrization.

Fig. 4 shows the relative contributions of the various cc¯c\bar{c} intermediate states to the total J/ψJ/\psi yield. Both TMD models predict nearly identical channel hierarchies, with CO states—particularly P2[8]3{}^{3}P_{2}^{[8]}, P0[8]3{}^{3}P_{0}^{[8]}, and S0[8]1{}^{1}S_{0}^{[8]}—dominating across the entire SPD energy range. The CS S1[1]3{}^{3}S_{1}^{[1]} contribution remains below the percent level even at s=30GeV\sqrt{s}=30~\mathrm{GeV}. This confirms the essential role of CO mechanisms in J/ψJ/\psi production at intermediate energies.

Finally, the total inclusive cross section as a function of s\sqrt{s} is presented in Fig. 5. The cross section rises monotonically with increasing energy and is well described by a shifted power-law form, (σJ/ψ=α(ss0)β)(\sigma_{J/\psi}=\alpha(\sqrt{s}-s_{0})^{\beta}), for s12GeV\sqrt{s}\gtrsim 12~\mathrm{GeV}. The point at s=9GeV\sqrt{s}=9~\mathrm{GeV} lies below the extrapolated curve, suggesting possible near-threshold suppression effects. The LLM2024{}^{\prime}2024 parametrization yields a higher normalization and a softer energy dependence (β1.8\beta\simeq 1.8) compared with KL2025{}^{\prime}2025 (β2.1\beta\simeq 2.1), implying a slower rise of gluon-driven production with energy. Between 1212 and 30GeV30~\mathrm{GeV}, the LLM2024{}^{\prime}2024-to-KL2025{}^{\prime}2025 scaling ratio decreases from about 2.5 to 2.0, highlighting the diminishing relative contribution from the LLM2024{}^{\prime}2024 gluon density as s\sqrt{s} increases. These results emphasize the strong sensitivity of J/ψJ/\psi production to the underlying gluon TMDs in the near-threshold region accessible at SPD/NICA.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Normalized differential cross sections (1/σ)dσ/dpT(1/\sigma)\,d\sigma/dp_{T} for J/ψJ/\psi production in pppp collisions at s=27GeV\sqrt{s}=27~\mathrm{GeV} obtained using the KL2025{}^{\prime}2025 Kotikov:2025wft and LLM2024{}^{\prime}2024 Lipatov:2024xni gluon densities. The solid curves represent empirical fits to the simulated spectra with parameters shown in the legend. The distributions are normalized to emphasize differences in spectral shape between the two TMD sets.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Relative contributions of different intermediate cc¯c\bar{c} states to the total J/ψJ/\psi production cross section in pppp collisions as a function of s\sqrt{s} for the KL2025{}^{\prime}2025 Kotikov:2025wft and LLM2024{}^{\prime}2024 Lipatov:2024xni gluon densities. The dominance pattern P2[8]3{}^{3}P_{2}^{[8]}>>P0[8]3{}^{3}P_{0}^{[8]}>>S0[8]1{}^{1}S_{0}^{[8]}>>P1[8]3{}^{3}P_{1}^{[8]}>>S1[8]3{}^{3}S_{1}^{[8]}>>S1[1]3{}^{3}S_{1}^{[1]} persists across the entire SPD energy range, with minimal model dependence.
Refer to caption
Figure 5: Total inclusive J/ψJ/\psi production cross section in pppp collisions as a function of the center-of-mass energy s\sqrt{s}, obtained with the KL2025{}^{\prime}2025 Kotikov:2025wft and LLM2024{}^{\prime}2024 Lipatov:2024xni gluon densities. The cross section increases with s\sqrt{s}, reflecting the growth of gluon luminosity. The shifted power-law fit provides an excellent description for s12GeV\sqrt{s}\gtrsim 12~\mathrm{GeV}; the deviation at s=9GeV\sqrt{s}=9~\mathrm{GeV} likely signals threshold or model-limit effects.

4. Summary— This work presents the first quantitative analysis of inclusive J/ψJ/\psi production in the SPD/NICA energy regime using modern TMD gluon densities. We have investigated the sensitivity of differential observables to scale variations, intermediate-state contributions, and the collision-energy dependence within both CCFM and KMR-based frameworks. The results establish a robust theoretical baseline for forthcoming SPD experimet and emphasize the need for refined gluon-density extractions in the low to intermediate energy region, where quarkonium production remains a uniquely sensitive probe of nonperturbative gluon dynamics.

Acknowledgements— S.S. expresses sincere gratitude to Prof. A.V. Lipatov for valuable clarifications regarding the use of TMD parton densities in PEGASUS, and to S. Puhan for helpful discussions. This work was done with support from Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russian Federation under State Assignment № 075-03-2025-662 from 17.01.2025 and by the Committee of Science of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. BR21881941).