From: "ccaviness (Clay Caviness)" Date: 2022-05-26T21:45:28+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:108717] [Ruby master Bug#18286] Universal arm64/x86_84 binary built on an x86_64 machine segfaults/is killed on arm64 Issue #18286 has been updated by ccaviness (Clay Caviness). I don't believe any of those bugs are related. My suspicion is that, when building on x86 and targeting universal, during `configure` for cross-compilation on arm64 the small test binaries that built cannot be executed on x86, leading to the various hints about the host machine to be wildly incorrect. When building on arm64 and targeting universal, these test binaries that are built for x86 can actually run on the arm64 machine successfully, due to the Rosetta x86 compatibility layer. There is no mechanism to run arm64 binaries on x86 Macs, though, so I think to get cross-compilation working on x86 many of the various autoconf hints will need to be manually set. I'm not that familiar with autoconf or what these values should be, though. ---------------------------------------- Bug #18286: Universal arm64/x86_84 binary built on an x86_64 machine segfaults/is killed on arm64 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18286#change-97768 * Author: ccaviness (Clay Caviness) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: 3.0.2 * Backport: 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- A universal arm64/x86_84 ruby binary for macOS built on a x86_64 machine segfaults/is killed when executed on an arm64 machine. To reproduce: * On an Intel Mac: `git clone https://github.com/ruby/ruby && cd ruby && git checkout v3_0_2 && ./autogen.sh && ./configure --with-arch=arm64,x86_64 && make -j$(sysctl -n hw.ncpu)` * Copy the built `./ruby` binary to an Apple Silicon machine * Attempt to execute it Expected: The universal `ruby` binary works correctly on both devices Actual: The universal `ruby` binary crashes with either `Segmentation fault: 11` or `Killed: 9` (this seems to occur if `arm64e` is used instead of `arm64`). Details: I'm attempting to build a universal Ruby for macOS that will run on both Intel (x86_64) and Apple Silicon (arm64) machines. It seemed initially that this was as easy as adding `--with-arch=arm64,x86_64` to `./configure` would do it, as it produced a `ruby` binary that reports as `Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures: [x86_64:Mach-O 64-bit executable x86_64] [arm64]` This `ruby` works correctly on the Intel machine I built in on, but does not work when copied to an Apple Silicon device. The reverse, however, seems to work. That is, if I build the universal ruby on an Apple Silicon machine, the `ruby` binary that's built seems to work correctly on both Intel and Apple Silicon machines. Intel: ``` $ ./ruby -v ruby 3.0.2p107 (2021-07-07 revision 0db68f0233) [universal.x86_64-darwin21] ``` Apple Silicon: ``` $ ./ruby -v Segmentation fault: 11 $ lldb ./ruby (lldb) target create "./ruby" Current executable set to '/Users/crc/ruby' (arm64). (lldb) run Process 77071 launched: '/Users/crc/ruby' (arm64) Process 77071 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x8) frame #0: 0x00000001002176b8 ruby`ruby_vm_special_exception_copy + 16 ruby`ruby_vm_special_exception_copy: -> 0x1002176b8 <+16>: ldr x0, [x0, #0x8] 0x1002176bc <+20>: bl 0x10011fed8 ; rb_class_real 0x1002176c0 <+24>: bl 0x10012070c ; rb_obj_alloc 0x1002176c4 <+28>: mov x20, x0 Target 0: (ruby) stopped. (lldb) ^D ``` I also attempted the same thing with ruby 2.7.4 source, with the same result. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: