From: "rits (First Last)" Date: 2012-12-05T17:10:30+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:50565] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7511] short-circuiting logical implication operator Issue #7511 has been updated by rits (First Last). naruse (Yui NARUSE) wrote: > How about a ? b : true One can get along without the implication operator, but for better readability / quicker mental parsing, it would be better than the existing alternatives, including ternary. ---------------------------------------- Feature #7511: short-circuiting logical implication operator https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7511#change-34404 Author: rits (First Last) Status: Open Priority: Normal Assignee: Category: Target version: I find I need logical implication (will use => here) in boolean expressions fairly often and even though a => b is equivalent to !a || b, this substitute is more difficult to read and make sense of in long expressions -- http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/